Sustainable technology of 3820

Sustainable technology of 3820 ?

It’s difficult to predict exactly what sustainable technology will look like in 3820. However, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and potential future developments.

Possible Trends:

• Advanced Energy Solutions: By 3820, we might have mastered fusion power or other forms of clean, abundant energy. This could lead to technologies like personal fusion reactors or energy-efficient devices powered by ambient energy.
• Closed-Loop Systems: Technologies focused on complete resource recycling and waste elimination could be prevalent. This might include advanced material science for self-healing and endlessly recyclable products, or biological systems that break down waste into usable resources.
• Biotechnology Integration: We might see a deeper integration of biology and technology. This could involve using biological processes for manufacturing, energy production, or even creating living technologies that adapt and evolve.
• Hyper-Efficient Resource Use: Technologies that minimize resource consumption could be highly advanced. This might include nanoscale manufacturing, where materials are used with atomic precision, or technologies that extract resources from previously inaccessible sources with minimal environmental impact.
• Decentralized and Localized Systems: Sustainable technology in 3820 might favor decentralized and localized systems for energy, food production, and manufacturing. This could lead to greater resilience and reduced reliance on large-scale infrastructure.

Challenges and Considerations:

• Unforeseen Discoveries: Technological progress is unpredictable. New scientific discoveries could lead to entirely different approaches to sustainability that we cannot currently imagine.
• Ethical Considerations: As technology advances, ethical considerations become increasingly important. In 3820, we might face complex ethical dilemmas related to the use of biotechnology, artificial intelligence, or other advanced technologies.
• Social and Economic Factors: The adoption of sustainable technology depends not only on scientific advancements but also on social and economic factors. In 3820, societal values and economic systems will play a crucial role in shaping the development and implementation of sustainable solutions.

Overall:

Sustainable technology in 3820 is likely to be highly advanced, integrated with natural systems, and focused on minimizing environmental impact. It will require not only scientific innovation but also careful consideration of ethical and societal implications.

It’s important to remember that this is just speculation. The actual future of sustainable technology could be very different. However, by considering current trends and potential challenges, we can begin to imagine the possibilities and work towards a more sustainable future.

What is Sustainable technology of 3820 ?

Predicting the exact nature of sustainable technology in 3820 is a fascinating thought experiment! While we can’t know for sure, we can speculate based on current trends and potential advancements. Here are some possibilities:

1. Energy:

• Fusion Power: Perhaps by 3820, fusion energy will be a widely available and efficient power source, providing clean and abundant energy for all.
• Ambient Energy Harvesting: Imagine devices powered by the energy surrounding us – vibrations, heat, even radio waves. This could make batteries obsolete.
• Energy-Efficient Infrastructure: Buildings and cities might be designed to minimize energy use, perhaps even generating their own power through integrated solar or other renewable technologies.

2. Resource Management:

• Closed-Loop Systems: We might have perfected the art of recycling and resource reuse. Materials could be endlessly repurposed, and waste as we know it might no longer exist.
• Advanced Material Science: Self-healing materials, biodegradable plastics, or even materials grown in labs could be commonplace, reducing our reliance on finite resources.
• Resource Extraction from New Sources: Perhaps we’ll have developed ways to sustainably extract resources from space or other previously inaccessible locations.

3. Biotechnology and Nature:

• Bio-Integrated Technology: Imagine technology that works seamlessly with living systems. We might use biological processes for manufacturing, energy production, or even to create living technologies that adapt and evolve.
• Restoration and Enhancement of Ecosystems: Technology could play a key role in restoring damaged ecosystems and even enhancing natural processes to better support life on Earth.

4. Manufacturing and Production:

• Nanotechnology: Manufacturing at the atomic level could become a reality, allowing us to create materials and products with incredible precision and minimal waste.
• Localized Production: Decentralized manufacturing systems could be common, reducing the need for long-distance transportation and promoting local economies.

5. Information and Communication:

• Seamless Integration: Technology might be so seamlessly integrated into our lives that it becomes almost invisible. We might interact with information and each other in ways we can’t even imagine today.
• AI for Sustainability: Advanced AI systems could help us monitor and manage resources, optimize energy use, and even predict and prevent environmental problems.

Important Considerations:

• Ethical Implications: With such powerful technologies, ethical considerations will be paramount. How do we ensure these technologies are used responsibly and for the benefit of all?
• Social and Economic Factors: The adoption of sustainable technology will depend on social and economic factors as well. Will we have created societies that prioritize sustainability and equity?

It’s exciting to imagine the possibilities! While we can’t predict the future with certainty, by focusing on innovation, ethical considerations, and a commitment to sustainability, we can work towards a future where technology and nature coexist in harmony.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 3820 ?

It’s more accurate to ask “Who will benefit from sustainable technology in 3820?” rather than “Who is required…” as the latter implies obligation. Here’s a breakdown of who would likely benefit:

• Humanity as a whole: The most significant beneficiary would be humanity itself. Sustainable technologies would be crucial for ensuring the long-term survival and well-being of our species by addressing challenges like climate change, resource depletion, and pollution.
• Future generations: Sustainable technology is inherently about preserving resources and a healthy environment for those who come after us. Future generations would inherit a world where their basic needs can be met and where they have the opportunity to thrive.
• Ecosystems and biodiversity: Sustainable technology would play a vital role in protecting and restoring ecosystems, preserving biodiversity, and ensuring the health of the planet. This benefits not only nature itself but also humanity, as we depend on healthy ecosystems for essential services like clean air, water, and food.
• All living beings: In a world where sustainability is prioritized, all living beings would benefit from a healthier and more balanced environment. This includes animals, plants, and all other forms of life.

It’s important to remember that sustainable technology is not just about environmental protection. It also encompasses social and economic aspects, aiming to create a more equitable and just world for all. In 3820, this could mean:

• Reduced inequality: Sustainable technologies could help bridge the gap between rich and poor by ensuring access to essential resources and opportunities for all.
• Improved quality of life: Sustainable solutions could lead to better health, education, and living conditions for people around the world.
• Stronger and more resilient societies: Sustainable practices could help communities become more resilient to environmental challenges and economic shocks.

In essence, sustainable technology in 3820 would be essential for creating a world where both humanity and nature can flourish. It would be a foundation for a future where everyone has the opportunity to live a good life within the means of the planet.

When is required Sustainable technology of 3820 ?

This is a really interesting question! It gets at the heart of why we talk about sustainable technology in the first place.

While the ideal scenario is that we start developing and implementing sustainable technologies now so that they are well-established and advanced by 3820, the reality is that the “when” is a bit more complex. Here’s why:

• Urgency of Current Challenges: We need sustainable technology now to address the pressing issues of the 21st century: climate change, resource depletion, pollution, etc. The longer we wait, the more severe these problems become, and the harder it will be to solve them.
• Foundation for the Future: The sustainable technologies we develop today will be the foundation for the technologies of 3820. The research, innovation, and infrastructure we build now will shape the possibilities of the future.
• Continuous Development: Sustainable technology is not a one-time achievement. It requires continuous development, adaptation, and improvement. We need to be constantly innovating and refining our technologies to ensure they remain effective and sustainable in the long term.

So, the answer is multifaceted:

• “Now” is crucial: We need to act now to mitigate current environmental challenges and lay the groundwork for a sustainable future.
• “Continuous” is key: Sustainable technology requires ongoing effort and investment to ensure its long-term viability.
• “3820” is the horizon: While we may not know exactly what sustainable technology will look like in 3820, we can be sure that it will be built upon the foundations we lay today.

In essence, the “when” for sustainable technology is not a single point in time, but rather a continuous process that starts now and extends far into the future. It’s about recognizing the urgency of our current situation while also working towards a long-term vision of a sustainable world.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

Where is required Sustainable technology of 3820 ?

That’s a great question that gets us thinking about the scope of sustainable technology! Here’s how we can approach it:

1. Globally:

• Everywhere on Earth: Sustainable technology is needed in every corner of the world. From bustling cities to remote villages, we need solutions that address local challenges while contributing to global sustainability. This includes:
  • Developed nations: To transition away from unsustainable consumption patterns and provide leadership in developing and sharing sustainable technologies.
  • Developing nations: To leapfrog traditional, polluting technologies and adopt sustainable solutions from the outset, enabling sustainable economic growth.
• Across all sectors: Sustainable technology is needed in all sectors of human activity:
  • Energy: To power our lives and industries with clean and renewable sources.
  • Food production: To ensure food security while minimizing environmental impact.
  • Transportation: To move people and goods efficiently and sustainably.
  • Manufacturing: To produce goods with minimal waste and pollution.
  • Construction: To build sustainable and resilient infrastructure.

2. Beyond Earth:

• Space exploration: As we venture further into space, sustainable technologies will be crucial for:
  • Resource utilization: To extract and use resources from other planets and celestial bodies sustainably.
  • Life support: To create closed-loop systems that can support human life in space for extended periods.
• Other planets: If humanity expands beyond Earth, sustainable technologies will be essential for creating habitable and thriving communities on other planets.

3. In the Digital Realm:

• Cyberspace: Even in the digital world, sustainability is important. This includes:
  • Energy-efficient computing: To reduce the energy consumption of data centers and digital devices.
  • Sustainable software development: To create software that is optimized for resource use and has minimal environmental impact.
  • Responsible data management: To handle data in a way that is secure, ethical, and sustainable.

In essence, sustainable technology is needed wherever human activity takes place. It’s about creating a future where we can thrive without compromising the health of our planet or the well-being of future generations.

It’s important to remember that the “where” of sustainable technology is not just about physical locations. It’s also about the interconnectedness of systems and the need for holistic solutions that address challenges across different scales and sectors.

How is required Sustainable technology of 3820 ?

The question “How is sustainable technology required in 3820?” is a bit tricky because it implies we’re asking how it’s needed at that distant point in the future. It’s more helpful to think about why it will be essential and what characteristics it will likely need to have. Here’s a breakdown:

Why sustainable technology will be essential in 3820 (and beyond):

• Maintaining Planetary Balance: Even with centuries of progress, the fundamental need to live within the Earth’s (or any other inhabited planet’s) carrying capacity will remain. Sustainable technology will be crucial for managing resources, minimizing waste, and preserving ecosystems.
• Adapting to Change: The environment will likely continue to change, even with our best efforts. Sustainable technology will be necessary for adapting to these changes, whether they are natural or human-induced (e.g., climate change, resource shifts).
• Supporting a Thriving Civilization: Sustainable technology will be the foundation upon which societies in 3820 can thrive. It will ensure access to essential resources, promote economic stability, and contribute to the overall well-being of communities.
• Enabling Further Progress: Sustainable technology won’t just be about maintaining the status quo. It will also be about enabling further progress in areas like space exploration, scientific discovery, and human development, all while respecting planetary boundaries.

What characteristics sustainable technology in 3820 will likely need:

• Highly Efficient and Resourceful: Technologies will need to be incredibly efficient in their use of energy and resources, minimizing waste and maximizing output. Think closed-loop systems and near-perfect recycling.
• Integrated with Natural Systems: A deep understanding of ecology and how human systems interact with the natural world will be essential. Technologies will likely mimic natural processes and work in harmony with ecosystems.
• Resilient and Adaptable: Technologies will need to be resilient to environmental changes, able to adapt to new conditions, and capable of self-repair.
• Decentralized and Localized: To enhance resilience and reduce reliance on large, vulnerable infrastructure, sustainable technologies may favor decentralized and localized systems for energy production, manufacturing, and resource management.
• Ethically Developed and Used: By 3820, hopefully, there will be robust ethical frameworks guiding technological development and use. This will ensure that technologies are used responsibly and for the benefit of all.
• Advanced Material Science: Materials might be grown, self-assembled, or possess properties we can barely imagine today. They would likely be endlessly recyclable or biodegradable.
• Biotechnology Integration: Biological processes could be seamlessly integrated with technology for manufacturing, energy production, resource management, and even computation.

In short, sustainable technology in 3820 will be required to maintain a healthy planet, support a thriving civilization, and enable further progress. It will need to be highly efficient, integrated with natural systems, resilient, ethically developed, and based on advanced scientific understanding. It’s not just about how it’s required, but what it will need to be to meet the challenges and opportunities of that era.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 3820 ?

It’s difficult to give a specific “case study” of sustainable technology in 3820 because it’s so far in the future! We can’t know the exact technologies that will exist or the specific challenges they will address.

However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on current trends and potential future developments. This will allow us to explore what sustainable technology in 3820 might look like:

Hypothetical Case Study: The Great Lakes Restoration Project – 3820

Background:

By the early 21st century, the Great Lakes ecosystem in North America had suffered significant damage from pollution, invasive species, and climate change. However, through centuries of effort and technological advancement, the lakes were restored to a thriving and balanced state by 3820.

Sustainable Technology Solutions:

• Advanced Bioremediation: Nanotechnology was used to develop microscopic organisms that could break down pollutants and restore the natural balance of the lake’s ecosystem. These organisms were self-replicating and could adapt to changing conditions.
• Closed-Loop Water Management: Cities around the Great Lakes had implemented advanced water recycling systems that captured and purified wastewater, eliminating the need to discharge pollutants into the lakes.
• Smart Infrastructure: Sensors and AI systems monitored the health of the lakes in real-time, detecting and addressing potential problems before they could escalate. This included monitoring water quality, invasive species, and climate-related changes.
• Energy-Efficient Transportation: Transportation around the Great Lakes region relied on sustainable energy sources, such as advanced biofuels and electric vehicles powered by renewable energy. This minimized pollution and reduced the impact of transportation on the environment.
• Ecological Restoration: Biotechnology was used to restore native plant and animal populations to the Great Lakes ecosystem. This included genetic engineering to make species more resilient to climate change and disease.

Outcomes:

• Restored Ecosystem: The Great Lakes ecosystem was thriving, with clean water, healthy fish populations, and diverse plant life.
• Sustainable Economy: The region had a strong and sustainable economy based on renewable resources, eco-tourism, and sustainable agriculture.
• Resilient Communities: Communities around the Great Lakes were resilient to climate change and other environmental challenges.
• Improved Quality of Life: People living in the region enjoyed a high quality of life, with access to clean water, healthy food, and a beautiful natural environment.

Lessons Learned:

• Long-term Vision: The restoration of the Great Lakes required a long-term vision and commitment to sustainability.
• Technological Innovation: Advanced technologies played a crucial role in addressing the complex challenges facing the Great Lakes ecosystem.
• Collaboration: Collaboration between governments, scientists, businesses, and communities was essential for success.
• Ethical Considerations: The use of advanced technologies, such as biotechnology, required careful consideration of ethical implications.

This is just one example, of course. Sustainable technology in 3820 could be applied to a wide range of challenges, from energy production and resource management to space exploration and human health. But the key takeaway is that it will be essential for creating a world where both humanity and nature can thrive.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

White paper on Sustainable technology of 3820 ?

White Paper: Envisioning Sustainable Technology in 3820

Abstract:

Predicting the precise nature of sustainable technology in 3820 is a speculative endeavor. However, by extrapolating current trends, considering potential scientific breakthroughs, and acknowledging the enduring challenges facing humanity, we can construct a plausible vision of how technology might contribute to a sustainable future centuries from now. This white paper explores potential advancements in key areas, examines the ethical considerations that will likely shape technological development, and highlights the importance of continuous innovation and adaptation in achieving long-term sustainability.

1. Introduction:

The concept of sustainable technology centers around meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. By 3820, this principle will likely be deeply ingrained in all aspects of technological development. This paper explores potential advancements across key areas, recognizing that the trajectory of technological progress is inherently unpredictable.

2. Potential Advancements:

• Energy: Fusion power, or some other form of abundant, clean energy, is likely to be a cornerstone of civilization in 3820. Advanced energy harvesting technologies, possibly utilizing ambient energy sources, could further reduce reliance on traditional power grids. Nanotechnology might play a role in creating incredibly efficient energy storage solutions.
• Resource Management: Closed-loop systems, where resources are continuously recycled and reused, could be ubiquitous. Advanced material science might produce self-healing materials, biodegradable plastics, or even materials grown in laboratories, minimizing our dependence on finite resources. Resource extraction from extraterrestrial sources could also be a reality.
• Biotechnology and Nature: The integration of biology and technology could be profound. Bio-integrated systems might be used for manufacturing, energy production, and environmental remediation. Living technologies that adapt and evolve could become commonplace. Ecosystem restoration and enhancement through targeted biotechnological interventions could play a vital role in preserving biodiversity.
• Manufacturing and Production: Nanotechnology and advanced manufacturing techniques could enable the creation of products with atomic precision, minimizing waste and resource consumption. Decentralized and localized production systems could reduce transportation needs and promote local economies.
• Information and Communication: Technology might be seamlessly integrated into daily life, becoming almost invisible. Advanced AI systems could play a critical role in optimizing resource use, monitoring environmental conditions, and predicting potential problems.

3. Ethical Considerations:

As technology advances, so too will the complexity of ethical dilemmas. By 3820, robust ethical frameworks will be crucial for guiding technological development and ensuring that it serves humanity’s best interests. Key ethical considerations might include:

• Environmental Stewardship: Balancing human needs with the preservation of natural ecosystems.
• Resource Equity: Ensuring equitable access to resources for all people.
• Technological Unemployment: Addressing the potential displacement of human labor by advanced technologies.
• Biotechnology Ethics: Navigating the ethical implications of manipulating living systems.
• Artificial Intelligence Safety: Ensuring that advanced AI systems are aligned with human values and goals.

4. The Importance of Continuous Innovation and Adaptation:

Sustainable technology is not a static achievement. It requires continuous innovation, adaptation, and improvement to meet evolving challenges and opportunities. By 3820, a culture of continuous learning and adaptation will be essential for ensuring long-term sustainability. This includes:

• Investing in Research and Development: Supporting scientific research and technological innovation in key areas.
• Promoting Education and Awareness: Educating future generations about the importance of sustainability and equipping them with the skills to develop and implement sustainable solutions.
• Fostering International Collaboration: Working together across national borders to address global challenges.

5. Conclusion:

While the specifics of sustainable technology in 3820 remain unknown, it is clear that technological innovation will play a crucial role in creating a sustainable future. By focusing on efficiency, integration with natural systems, resilience, ethical development, and continuous adaptation, we can pave the way for a world where both humanity and nature can thrive for centuries to come. The journey towards this future begins today, with the choices we make and the technologies we develop.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 3820 ?

It’s fascinating to speculate about the industrial applications of sustainable technology in 3820! While we can’t know for sure, we can imagine some possibilities based on current trends and potential advancements:

1. Manufacturing:

• Nanofactories: Imagine factories at the nanoscale, able to precisely manipulate atoms and molecules to create any material or product with minimal waste. These nanofactories could be powered by clean energy sources and use closed-loop recycling systems.
• Biomanufacturing: Biological processes could be harnessed for manufacturing, growing materials and products in labs using engineered organisms. This could revolutionize industries like textiles, construction, and even electronics.
• Additive Manufacturing (Advanced 3D Printing): 3D printing could be incredibly advanced, allowing for the on-demand creation of complex products from recycled or bio-derived materials. This could decentralize manufacturing and reduce the need for large-scale factories.

2. Energy:

• Fusion Power Plants: Fusion energy, if mastered, could provide clean and abundant power for all industrial processes. These power plants would be highly efficient and produce minimal waste.
• Space-Based Solar Power: Solar energy collected in space could be beamed down to Earth, providing a continuous and reliable source of clean energy for industries.
• Localized Energy Grids: Industries might rely on localized and decentralized energy grids powered by a mix of renewable sources, such as solar, wind, and geothermal, tailored to their specific needs.

3. Resource Management:

• Closed-Loop Recycling Facilities: Advanced recycling facilities could break down materials into their constituent atoms and molecules, allowing them to be reused endlessly. This would eliminate the concept of waste and create a truly circular economy.
• Resource Extraction from New Sources: Industries might access resources from space or other previously inaccessible locations, using sustainable extraction methods that minimize environmental impact.
• Smart Resource Management Systems: AI-powered systems could monitor resource flows in real-time, optimizing their use and preventing shortages.

4. Transportation:

• Sustainable Transportation Networks: Industries would rely on sustainable transportation networks powered by clean energy, such as electric vehicles, maglev trains, and even potentially advanced forms of air travel.
• Autonomous Logistics Systems: AI-powered autonomous vehicles and drones could manage logistics and supply chains, optimizing routes and reducing energy consumption.

5. Construction:

• Self-Healing Materials: Buildings and infrastructure could be built from self-healing materials that can repair themselves, reducing maintenance costs and extending their lifespan.
• Bio-Integrated Architecture: Buildings might be grown using biological processes, integrating living systems into their structure.
• Modular and Adaptable Construction: Construction could rely on modular and adaptable systems that can be easily reconfigured or repurposed, minimizing waste and resource consumption.

6. Agriculture and Food Production:

• Vertical Farms and Controlled Environment Agriculture: Food production could take place in highly efficient vertical farms and controlled environments, minimizing land use and water consumption.
• Precision Agriculture: Advanced sensors and AI systems could optimize agricultural practices, reducing the use of fertilizers and pesticides.
• Lab-Grown Meat and Alternative Proteins: Industries might produce meat and other protein sources in labs, reducing the environmental impact of traditional agriculture.

Key Considerations:

• Automation and AI: Many of these industrial applications would likely rely heavily on automation and AI, leading to increased efficiency and productivity.
• Ethical Considerations: The development and use of these advanced technologies would require careful consideration of ethical implications, ensuring that they are used responsibly and for the benefit of all.

It’s important to remember that this is just speculation. The actual industrial applications of sustainable technology in 3820 could be very different. However, by considering current trends and potential advancements, we can begin to imagine the possibilities and work towards a future where industry and sustainability go hand in hand.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 3820 ?

It’s fascinating to consider the research and development (R&D) that might lead to sustainable technology in 3820! While we can’t predict the exact paths, we can imagine some key areas of focus:

1. Fundamental Science:

• Advanced Physics: Research into fundamental forces and particles could unlock new energy sources (perhaps beyond fusion), new forms of propulsion, or even new ways to manipulate gravity.
• Quantum Computing: Developing robust and scalable quantum computers could revolutionize materials science, allowing us to simulate and design new materials with unprecedented properties. It could also lead to breakthroughs in AI and other areas crucial for sustainable technology.
• Consciousness and AI: Understanding consciousness could be key to developing truly intelligent and ethical AI systems that can help us solve complex sustainability challenges.

2. Materials Science:

• Self-Healing and Adaptive Materials: Creating materials that can repair themselves, adapt to changing conditions, or even grow themselves could revolutionize construction, manufacturing, and many other industries.
• Programmable Matter: Imagine materials that can be programmed to change their shape, properties, or even function. This could lead to incredibly versatile and adaptable technologies.
• Biomimetic Materials: Studying and mimicking natural materials could inspire the development of new materials with exceptional properties, such as strength, lightness, or biodegradability.

3. Biotechnology:

• Synthetic Biology: Engineering new biological systems could allow us to create organisms that can produce energy, break down pollutants, or even manufacture materials.
• Genetic Engineering: Modifying existing organisms could make them more resilient to climate change, more efficient at photosynthesis, or even capable of producing valuable resources.
• Bio-Integrated Technology: Developing technologies that can seamlessly interface with living systems could lead to breakthroughs in medicine, agriculture, and even manufacturing.

4. Energy:

• Exotic Energy Sources: Exploring and harnessing unconventional energy sources, such as zero-point energy or dark energy, could provide us with clean and abundant power.
• Advanced Energy Storage: Developing highly efficient and long-lasting energy storage solutions could make renewable energy sources more reliable and widely usable.
• Energy Transmission: Finding new ways to transmit energy over long distances with minimal loss could enable the widespread use of renewable energy sources, even in remote locations.

5. Artificial Intelligence:

• General AI: Developing artificial intelligence that can reason, learn, and problem-solve like humans could lead to breakthroughs in many areas, including sustainability.
• AI for System Optimization: AI could be used to optimize complex systems, such as energy grids, transportation networks, and even global resource flows, to minimize waste and maximize efficiency.
• AI for Environmental Monitoring: AI could be used to analyze vast amounts of data from sensors and satellites to monitor the health of the planet and detect potential environmental problems.

6. Social Sciences and Ethics:

• Sustainable Economics: Developing new economic models that prioritize sustainability and social equity could help us transition to a more sustainable future.
• Environmental Ethics: Exploring the ethical implications of advanced technologies and developing frameworks for responsible innovation will be crucial.
• Social Engineering: Understanding how to promote sustainable behaviors and create a culture of sustainability will be essential for the widespread adoption of sustainable technologies.

It’s important to remember:

• Interdisciplinary Research: Solving complex sustainability challenges will require collaboration between scientists, engineers, social scientists, and ethicists.
• Long-Term Vision: Research and development for sustainable technology in 3820 will require a long-term vision and a commitment to investing in fundamental science.
• Open Innovation: Sharing knowledge and collaborating across national borders will be essential for accelerating progress.

By focusing on these key areas of research and development, we can lay the groundwork for a future where sustainable technology plays a crucial role in creating a thriving and balanced world.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

References

1. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r} Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
2. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
3. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
4. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
5. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u} Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
6. ^ Jump up to:^a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
8. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
10. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
11. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
12. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
16. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
17. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
18. ^ Jump up to:^a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
20. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
21. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
22. ^ Jump up to:^a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
23. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i} Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
24. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
27. ^ Jump up to:^a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
39. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
40. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
41. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
43. ^ Jump up to:^a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
44. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
49. ^ Jump up to:^a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
51. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
53. ^ Jump up to:^a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
67. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
72. ^ Jump up to:^a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
77. ^ Jump up to:^a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
79. ^ Jump up to:^a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
80. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
85. ^ Jump up to:^a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
89. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
92. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
96. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
97. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
103. ^ Jump up to:^a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
107. ^ Jump up to:^a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.
124. #blog #blogger #fashion #love #instagram #instagood #photography #lifestyle #travel #blogging #blogpost #bloggerstyle #style #follow #like #food #bloggers #music #fashionblogger #art #bloggerlife #photooftheday #life #beauty #influencer #k #instadaily #instablog #makeup #foodblogger