Sustainable technology of 3810

Sustainable technology of 3810 ?

It seems like you might be interested in the IEEE 3810 standard. This standard provides a framework for energy market simulation, which is important for the development and integration of renewable energy sources.

Here’s why this is relevant to sustainable technology:

  • Renewable Energy Integration: The standard helps simulate and analyze how renewable energy sources like solar and wind power can be effectively integrated into existing energy grids. This is crucial for increasing the share of renewables in our energy mix and reducing our reliance on fossil fuels.
  • Investment and Management: By providing a framework for simulation, the standard aids in the financing and management of green energy businesses. This can encourage investment in sustainable technologies and accelerate their adoption.

While the IEEE 3810 standard itself might not be a technology, it plays a vital role in supporting the development and implementation of sustainable technologies in the energy sector.

What is Sustainable technology of 3810 ?

Unfortunately, there is no widely recognized or established “Sustainable Technology of 3810”. It’s possible this term is:

  • A very niche or emerging concept: Perhaps it’s a new technology or idea not yet widely known.
  • A specific term within a certain field: It might be used within a particular industry or area of research.
  • A misunderstanding or typo: There might be a slight error in the name or reference.

However, based on the information I have, I can offer some potential interpretations and related concepts:

1. If “3810” refers to a standard (like IEEE 3810):

  • As mentioned before, IEEE 3810 is related to energy market simulation. Sustainable technologies within this context would be those that help integrate renewable energy sources, improve grid efficiency, and enable better energy management. Examples include:
    • Smart grid technologies: These use sensors, data analytics, and automation to optimize energy distribution and consumption.
    • Renewable energy technologies: Solar, wind, hydro, and other sources that produce energy with minimal environmental impact.
    • Energy storage solutions: Batteries, pumped hydro, and other technologies that store excess energy for later use.

2. If “3810” is a code or identifier:

  • It could refer to a specific project, research initiative, or product. Without more context, it’s difficult to guess what this might be. However, if it’s related to sustainability, it could involve technologies like:
    • Carbon capture and storage: Technologies that capture CO2 emissions from industrial processes and store them underground.
    • Sustainable materials: Materials that are renewable, recyclable, or have a lower environmental impact than traditional materials.
    • Circular economy solutions: Technologies and processes that minimize waste and maximize resource utilization.

3. If “3810” is a year in the future:

  • This is a very long-term perspective, and it’s difficult to predict what sustainable technologies might exist that far in the future. However, we can speculate based on current trends:
    • Advanced energy generation: Fusion power, advanced nuclear fission, or other technologies that provide clean and abundant energy.
    • Biotechnology and bio-integrated systems: Technologies that use biological processes to create sustainable materials, fuels, or other products.
    • Space-based solar power: Capturing solar energy in space and transmitting it to Earth.

To get a more specific answer, please provide more context about “Sustainable technology of 3810”. Where did you encounter this term? What is the general topic or area of interest? Any additional information will help me understand what you’re looking for.

Who is requiredSustainable technology of 3810 ?

It seems you’re asking about who would benefit from or is involved with the “Sustainable Technology of 3810”. Since this term is still a bit ambiguous, let’s explore some possibilities based on the previous discussion:

1. If “3810” refers to the IEEE 3810 standard (energy market simulation):

  • Energy companies: Utilities, renewable energy producers, and grid operators need to understand how to integrate sustainable technologies into their operations and optimize energy markets.
  • Researchers and engineers: Those developing and testing new sustainable energy technologies rely on simulation tools to assess their impact and effectiveness.
  • Policymakers: Governments and regulatory bodies use these simulations to make informed decisions about energy policies and incentives for sustainable technologies.
  • Investors: Financial institutions and investors use the insights from these simulations to evaluate the potential of sustainable energy projects and make investment decisions.

2. If “3810” is a code or identifier for a specific project or technology:

  • The stakeholders would depend on the specific technology. It could involve:
    • Manufacturers: Companies producing sustainable materials, renewable energy equipment, or other related products.
    • Consumers: Individuals and businesses who use sustainable technologies and benefit from their environmental and economic advantages.
    • Researchers and developers: Scientists and engineers working on the specific technology.
    • Communities: Local areas that might be impacted by the technology (e.g., where a renewable energy facility is located).

3. If “3810” refers to a distant future:

  • It’s harder to say definitively who would be involved in the far future. However, we can imagine that:
    • Future generations: They would be the ultimate beneficiaries of sustainable technologies that address climate change and resource scarcity.
    • Scientists and innovators: Those who develop these future technologies would play a crucial role.
    • Global organizations and governments: International cooperation would be essential to ensure the equitable distribution and implementation of sustainable technologies.

In general, sustainable technologies are relevant to a wide range of stakeholders, including:

  • Individuals: Everyone has a role to play in adopting sustainable practices and supporting sustainable technologies.
  • Businesses: Companies can benefit from sustainable technologies by reducing costs, improving their image, and accessing new markets.
  • Governments: Policymakers are responsible for creating an environment that encourages the development and adoption of sustainable technologies.
  • Researchers and innovators: They are the driving force behind the development of new sustainable solutions.
  • Environmental organizations: They advocate for sustainable practices and raise awareness about the importance of sustainable technologies.

To give you a more precise answer about who is required for the “Sustainable Technology of 3810”, please provide more information about what this term refers to.

When is required Sustainable technology of 3810 ?

Unfortunately, without more context about what “Sustainable technology of 3810” refers to, it’s impossible to give a precise answer about when it’s required. However, I can offer some potential scenarios based on the previous discussion:

1. If “3810” refers to the IEEE 3810 standard (energy market simulation):

  • Ongoing need: This standard is relevant whenever there’s a need to analyze and optimize energy markets, especially with the increasing integration of renewable energy sources. This is an ongoing need as we transition to a more sustainable energy system.
  • Specific projects: The standard might be particularly important for specific projects involving the development of new renewable energy infrastructure, the implementation of smart grid technologies, or the creation of new energy market mechanisms.

2. If “3810” is a code or identifier for a specific project or technology:

  • Project timeline: The “when” would depend on the specific project timeline. It might be required during the research and development phase, the implementation phase, or the operational phase.
  • Technology lifecycle: The relevance of the technology would depend on its lifecycle. It might be crucial during its early stages of development, its widespread adoption, or its eventual replacement by newer technologies.

3. If “3810” refers to a distant future:

  • Future challenges: Sustainable technologies of the far future would be required when we face critical challenges related to climate change, resource scarcity, and the need for clean and abundant energy. This could be in the coming decades or centuries.
  • Technological advancements: The specific timing would depend on when these future technologies become feasible and available.

In general, the need for sustainable technologies is urgent and ongoing. We need to adopt sustainable solutions now to address the pressing environmental challenges we face. However, the specific technologies and their required timing will vary depending on the context and the specific challenges being addressed.

To give you a more accurate answer about when “Sustainable technology of 3810” is required, please provide more information about what this term refers to.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

Where is required Sustainable technology of 3810 ?

This is a tricky question to answer without knowing exactly what “Sustainable technology of 3810” refers to. But let’s break it down based on our previous discussion:

1. If “3810” refers to the IEEE 3810 standard (energy market simulation):

  • Anywhere energy systems are being planned or analyzed: This could include:
    • Power plants: When designing new facilities or integrating renewable energy sources.
    • Grid infrastructure: When upgrading or expanding electricity grids.
    • Energy markets: When developing new market mechanisms or regulations.
    • Research institutions: When studying energy systems and developing new technologies.
    • Government agencies: When making policy decisions related to energy and sustainability.

2. If “3810” is a code or identifier for a specific project or technology:

  • The location would be specific to that project or technology:
    • Manufacturing facilities: Where sustainable materials or equipment are produced.
    • Deployment sites: Where the technology is being used (e.g., a solar farm, a building with energy-efficient systems).
    • Research labs: Where the technology is being developed or tested.

3. If “3810” refers to a distant future:

  • It’s impossible to pinpoint specific locations:
    • Potentially everywhere: Sustainable technologies of the future would likely be needed globally to address challenges like climate change and resource scarcity.
    • Focus areas: Certain regions might be particularly important, such as those with abundant renewable resources or those vulnerable to climate change impacts.

In general, sustainable technologies are needed in a wide range of places, including:

  • Homes and buildings: For energy efficiency, water conservation, and waste reduction.
  • Transportation systems: For electric vehicles, public transit, and other sustainable transportation options.
  • Industries: For cleaner production processes, resource efficiency, and waste management.
  • Agriculture: For sustainable farming practices and food production.
  • Cities and communities: For sustainable urban planning and development.

Ultimately, the “where” for “Sustainable technology of 3810” depends entirely on what that term specifically refers to. If you can provide more context, I can give you a more accurate answer.

How is required Sustainable technology of 3810 ?

Again, without a clear definition of “Sustainable technology of 3810,” it’s difficult to give a precise answer about how it’s required. However, I can offer some possibilities based on the previous discussion:

1. If “3810” refers to the IEEE 3810 standard (energy market simulation):

  • Through implementation of the standard: The standard provides a framework. It’s “required” in the sense that organizations should use it if they want to create accurate and reliable simulations of energy markets, especially those incorporating renewable energy sources. It’s not a legal requirement, but a best practice.
  • By using simulation tools and models: The standard guides the development and use of software and models that simulate energy market behavior. These tools are how the standard is practically applied.

2. If “3810” is a code or identifier for a specific project or technology:

  • Through specific implementation steps: The “how” would depend entirely on the technology itself:
    • Manufacturing: If it’s a physical product, it would be required through manufacturing processes, quality control, etc.
    • Deployment: If it’s a system or infrastructure, it would be required through installation, integration, and operation.
    • Research: If it’s a research project, it would be required through experiments, data analysis, and publication.

3. If “3810” refers to a distant future technology:

  • Through research, development, and innovation: Future sustainable technologies will be “required” through scientific breakthroughs, engineering design, and technological advancements.
  • Through policy and investment: Government support, funding, and regulations will play a crucial role in fostering the development and deployment of future sustainable technologies.

In general, sustainable technologies are “required” through a combination of factors:

  • Policy and regulation: Governments can mandate the use of certain sustainable technologies or incentivize their adoption through subsidies and tax breaks.
  • Market forces: Consumer demand for sustainable products and services can drive innovation and adoption.
  • Technological advancements: Research and development are essential for creating new and improved sustainable technologies.
  • Education and awareness: Raising awareness about the importance of sustainability can encourage individuals and organizations to adopt sustainable practices.
  • International cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change requires collaboration between countries to develop and implement sustainable solutions.

To give you a more specific answer about how “Sustainable technology of 3810” is required, please provide more context about what this term refers to.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 3810 ?

A case study can be used to examine sustainable technology related to energy markets (which is what we’ve been discussing in relation to the IEEE 3810 standard). However, a case study itself is not the technology. It’s a method of investigating and presenting information about a specific example.

Here’s how a case study could be relevant to the topic:

  • Illustrating the application of IEEE 3810: A case study could examine a specific instance where the IEEE 3810 standard was used to model an energy market with a high penetration of renewable energy. It could detail the challenges faced, the solutions implemented, and the results achieved.
  • Analyzing the impact of a sustainable technology: A case study could focus on a particular sustainable technology (e.g., a smart grid system, a community solar project, or a new type of energy storage) and analyze its impact on the energy market, the environment, and the local community.
  • Comparing different approaches to sustainable energy integration: A case study could compare different strategies for integrating renewable energy into the grid, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.

Example:

A case study might examine the integration of a large-scale wind farm into an existing power grid. It could use simulations based on the IEEE 3810 standard to model the impact of the wind farm on grid stability, power flow, and market prices. The case study could also analyze the economic, environmental, and social benefits of the wind farm, as well as any challenges encountered during its development and operation.

In summary: A case study is a tool for learning about and understanding sustainable technologies, particularly within the context of energy markets. It’s not the technology itself, but a way to investigate and present information about it. It helps to bridge the gap between theory (like a standard) and practice (real-world projects).

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

White paper on Sustainable technology of 3810 ?

It appears you’re interested in a white paper about sustainable technology in the context of the IEEE 3810 standard. While I couldn’t find a specific white paper with that exact title, I can offer some potential avenues to find relevant information:

1. Search for white papers on related topics:

  • Energy market simulation: Look for white papers discussing the challenges and opportunities of modeling energy markets, especially with the integration of renewable energy sources.
  • Renewable energy integration: Search for white papers that explore the technical, economic, and policy aspects of integrating renewable energy into existing power grids.
  • Smart grid technologies: Find white papers that discuss the role of smart grids in enabling a more sustainable energy system.
  • IEEE 3810 standard: While a white paper specifically on “Sustainable technology of 3810” might not exist, you could search for resources that explain the standard and its applications in more detail.

2. Explore resources from relevant organizations:

  • IEEE: The IEEE website might have publications, reports, or white papers related to the 3810 standard and its applications.
  • Energy industry associations: Organizations like the Edison Electric Institute (EEI) or the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) often publish white papers on topics related to sustainable energy.
  • Research institutions and universities: Many research institutions and universities conduct studies on sustainable energy and publish their findings in white papers or reports.

3. Consider the purpose of a white paper:

  • Problem/solution: White papers often address a specific problem and propose a solution. In this case, it might discuss the challenges of integrating renewable energy into the grid and how the IEEE 3810 standard can help overcome those challenges.
  • Technical overview: A white paper could provide a technical overview of the IEEE 3810 standard, explaining its key features and how it can be used to model different energy market scenarios.
  • Case study analysis: As discussed earlier, a white paper could present a case study of a specific project that used the IEEE 3810 standard to analyze the impact of a sustainable technology on the energy market.

4. If you need a white paper for a specific purpose:

  • Commission a white paper: If you have a specific need for a white paper on this topic, you could consider commissioning one from a research firm, consulting company, or expert in the field.

Remember that a white paper is a document that presents information or arguments in a concise and authoritative way. It’s often used to inform decision-making or to promote a particular viewpoint. Therefore, it’s important to consider the source and the intended audience of any white paper you find.

By exploring these avenues, you should be able to find relevant information about sustainable technology in the context of the IEEE 3810 standard, even if a white paper with the exact title doesn’t exist.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 3810 ?

While the specific “Sustainable technology of 3810” remains unclear, let’s explore how sustainable technologies, in general, are applied in various industries, and how the IEEE 3810 standard (for energy market simulation) can play a role:

General Industrial Applications of Sustainable Technologies:

  • Manufacturing:
    • Energy efficiency: Implementing energy-efficient equipment, optimizing processes to reduce energy consumption, and using renewable energy sources to power facilities.
    • Resource efficiency: Minimizing waste, using recycled or sustainable materials, and designing products for durability and recyclability.
    • Pollution reduction: Reducing emissions of greenhouse gases and other pollutants through cleaner technologies and processes.
  • Energy:
    • Renewable energy generation: Developing and deploying solar, wind, hydro, and other renewable energy technologies.
    • Smart grids: Implementing smart grid technologies to improve grid efficiency, reliability, and integration of renewable energy sources.
    • Energy storage: Developing and deploying energy storage solutions to store excess renewable energy and provide grid stability.
  • Transportation:
    • Electric vehicles: Manufacturing and promoting electric vehicles and developing charging infrastructure.
    • Sustainable fuels: Developing and using biofuels and other sustainable transportation fuels.
    • Efficient logistics: Optimizing logistics and transportation routes to reduce fuel consumption and emissions.
  • Agriculture:
    • Sustainable farming practices: Implementing practices that reduce water and fertilizer use, minimize soil erosion, and promote biodiversity.
    • Precision agriculture: Using technology to optimize crop yields and reduce resource inputs.
    • Renewable energy in agriculture: Using solar and wind power to run farm equipment and irrigation systems.
  • Construction:
    • Green buildings: Designing and constructing buildings that are energy-efficient, use sustainable materials, and minimize environmental impact.
    • Sustainable infrastructure: Developing and maintaining infrastructure (roads, bridges, etc.) in a way that minimizes environmental impact and promotes sustainability.

Role of IEEE 3810 in Industrial Applications:

The IEEE 3810 standard, focused on energy market simulation, can be applied in various industries to:

  • Analyze the impact of sustainable technologies: Industries can use simulations to assess how the adoption of sustainable technologies (e.g., renewable energy, energy efficiency measures) will affect their energy costs, emissions, and overall sustainability performance.
  • Optimize energy use and integration: Simulations can help industries optimize their energy consumption and integrate renewable energy sources into their operations more effectively.
  • Support decision-making: The results of energy market simulations can inform investment decisions, technology choices, and policy development related to sustainable technologies.

Example:

A manufacturing company could use simulations based on the IEEE 3810 standard to analyze the potential benefits of installing a solar power system on its factory roof. The simulation could model the impact of the solar system on the company’s energy costs, carbon footprint, and participation in energy markets. This information could help the company make an informed decision about whether to invest in solar energy.

Key takeaway: Sustainable technologies are being applied across a wide range of industries to improve resource efficiency, reduce environmental impact, and promote a more sustainable future. The IEEE 3810 standard, while focused on energy markets, can play a supporting role by enabling industries to analyze and optimize their use of sustainable technologies.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 3810 ?

You’re asking about the cutting edge of sustainable technology, and that’s an exciting area! Here’s a breakdown of research and development (R&D) in this field, with a focus on how it might relate to the IEEE 3810 standard (energy market simulation):

Key Areas of R&D in Sustainable Technology:

  • Advanced Renewable Energy Technologies:
    • Next-generation solar: Perovskite solar cells, bifacial panels, and floating solar farms are being researched to increase efficiency and reduce costs.
    • Advanced wind power: Taller turbines, offshore wind farms, and airborne wind energy systems are being developed to capture more wind energy.
    • Enhanced hydropower: Research is focused on improving the efficiency of existing hydropower plants and developing new, environmentally friendly hydropower technologies.
    • Bioenergy and biofuels: R&D is exploring sustainable ways to produce energy from biomass, including algae-based biofuels and advanced biofuels from agricultural waste.
  • Energy Storage:
    • Advanced batteries: Lithium-ion batteries are being improved in terms of energy density, cost, and safety. Research is also exploring alternative battery technologies, such as flow batteries and solid-state batteries.
    • Pumped hydro storage: This mature technology is being further developed to increase its capacity and efficiency.
    • Thermal energy storage: Technologies that store heat or cold are being researched for applications in buildings and industrial processes.
    • Hydrogen storage: Hydrogen is a promising energy carrier, but efficient and safe storage methods are needed.
  • Smart Grids:
    • Grid management systems: Advanced software and algorithms are being developed to optimize grid operations, integrate renewable energy sources, and improve grid resilience.
    • Smart meters and sensors: These devices provide real-time data on energy consumption and grid conditions, enabling better grid management and demand response programs.
    • Cybersecurity: As grids become more interconnected, cybersecurity is a critical area of research to protect against cyberattacks.
  • Sustainable Materials:
    • Bio-based materials: Research is exploring the use of renewable resources to create sustainable materials for construction, packaging, and other applications.
    • Recyclable and biodegradable materials: Developing materials that can be easily recycled or that decompose naturally is crucial for reducing waste.
    • Lightweight and high-performance materials: These materials can improve the energy efficiency of vehicles and other products.
  • Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS):
    • Capture technologies: R&D is focused on developing more efficient and cost-effective methods for capturing CO2 emissions from industrial sources.
    • Storage methods: Research is investigating safe and long-term ways to store captured CO2 underground.
    • Utilization: Exploring ways to use captured CO2 to create valuable products, such as fuels and chemicals.

How R&D Relates to IEEE 3810:

  • Modeling new technologies: As new sustainable technologies are developed, researchers and engineers need to model their impact on energy markets. The IEEE 3810 standard provides a framework for doing this.
  • Analyzing integration challenges: R&D efforts often focus on how to integrate new technologies into existing energy systems. Simulations based on IEEE 3810 can help identify potential challenges and optimize integration strategies.
  • Evaluating policy options: Policymakers need to understand the potential impact of different policies on the adoption and deployment of sustainable technologies. Energy market simulations can help inform policy decisions.

Example:

Researchers might be developing a new type of battery with significantly higher energy density. To assess its potential impact on the energy market, they could use simulations based on the IEEE 3810 standard to model how the new battery would affect electricity prices, grid stability, and the competitiveness of other energy storage technologies.

In conclusion: R&D in sustainable technology is a dynamic and rapidly evolving field. It’s crucial for developing the solutions we need to address climate change and create a more sustainable future. The IEEE 3810 standard, while not a technology itself, plays a vital role by providing a framework for analyzing and understanding the impact of new sustainable technologies on energy markets.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

References

  1. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”Sustainability Science14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681Pdoi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5ISSN 1862-4065 Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075Rdoi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3ISSN 1187-7863S2CID 146790960.
  3. Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”Sustainability2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424hdl:10535/6499ISSN 2071-1050 Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1OCLC 1124780147.
  6. Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”Sustainability2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”Environmental Science & Policy112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236Vdoi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016PMC 7330600PMID 32834777.
  12. Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”Sustainability9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165hdl:10453/90953ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”Global Environmental Change68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222Adoi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”Society & Natural Resources27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777Bdoi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467ISSN 0894-1920S2CID 67783261.
  21. Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better FutureStockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011S2CID 248881465.
  22. Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”Annual Review of Environment and Resources41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039ISSN 1543-5938S2CID 156534921.
  23. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”Papers in Applied Geography2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365Hdoi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222ISSN 2375-4931S2CID 132458202.
  24. Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”Global Policy14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160ISSN 1758-5880S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”Resource Management and Optimization8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”Environmental Conservation14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101Bdoi:10.1017/S0376892900011449ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”Sustainability Science16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949Edoi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5PMC 7960882PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”BioScience67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125hdl:11336/71342ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”Nature415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23Cdoi:10.1038/415023aISSN 0028-0836PMID 11780095S2CID 9743349.
  53. Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”Sustainable Development13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon PressISBN 0-8070-4708-2OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”Sustainability8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”Sustainability11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”Geography Compass4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”Journal of Cleaner Production140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42Mdoi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”Sustainability8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: RoutledgeISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”Environment, Development and Sustainability15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225Mdoi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77Vdoi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”Ecological Economics8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103Pdoi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”Ecological Economics17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147Cdoi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3OCLC 951915998.
  77. Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: RoutledgeISBN 9781315765747.
  79. Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”Sustainability11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”Environmental Science & Technology56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510Pdoi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158ISSN 0013-936XPMC 8811958PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”Nature Communications11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107Wdoi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-yISSN 2041-1723PMC 7305220PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island PressISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random HouseISBN 978-1-84794-138-1OCLC 974194745.
  96. Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”Earth System Governance11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131Pdoi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131 Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”PNAS Nexus3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106PMC 10986754PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”Environmental Research Letters15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003Hdoi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842aISSN 1748-9326S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island PressISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4OCLC 704557307.
  107. Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”PLOS Biology10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405ISSN 1544-9173PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11Gdoi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”Journal of Cleaner Production314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973Ndoi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”Global Discourse7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”Sustainability15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054ISSN 2071-1050.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »