Sustainable Technology of 2970

81 / 100

Sustainable Technology of 2970 ?

While it’s impossible to predict the exact nature of sustainable technology in 2970, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and advancements:

1. Advanced Renewable Energy Systems:

Fusion Power: By 2970, fusion power might be a well-established and efficient energy source, providing clean and abundant energy for civilization.
Space-Based Solar Power: Large-scale solar farms in space could beam energy down to Earth, providing a continuous and reliable source of renewable energy.
Advanced Energy Storage: Highly efficient and compact energy storage solutions would likely be available, allowing for the seamless integration of renewable energy sources and powering everything from homes to transportation.

2. Closed-Loop Resource Systems:

Circular Economy: By 2970, the concept of a circular economy would be fully realized, with nearly all materials being reused, recycled, or repurposed.
Advanced Recycling Technologies: Highly efficient recycling technologies would be able to break down materials at a molecular level and reassemble them into new products, minimizing waste and the need for raw materials.
Resource Management Systems: Sophisticated systems would monitor and manage resource flows, ensuring that materials are used efficiently and sustainably.

3. Smart and Sustainable Infrastructure:

Smart Cities: Cities would be highly interconnected and optimized, using data and technology to improve energy efficiency, reduce waste, and enhance quality of life.
Sustainable Transportation: Transportation systems would be fully electric and highly efficient, with advanced public transportation systems and autonomous vehicles.
Green Buildings: Buildings would be designed to be self-sufficient, generating their own energy, managing their own waste, and integrating seamlessly with the natural environment.

4. Biotechnology and Biomimicry:

Biomanufacturing: Advanced biomanufacturing techniques would allow for the production of materials and products using biological systems, reducing the need for fossil fuels and harmful chemicals.
Bioremediation: Biotechnology would be used to clean up pollution and restore damaged ecosystems.
Biomimicry: Technologies would be inspired by nature, mimicking natural processes and designs to create more sustainable solutions.

5. Artificial Intelligence and Automation:

Optimized Systems: AI and automation would be used to optimize energy use, resource management, and other systems, making them more efficient and sustainable.
Precision Agriculture: AI-powered systems would be used to optimize

You stopped this response

What is Sustainable Technology of 2970 ?

Predicting the exact nature of sustainable technology in 2970 is a fascinating thought experiment! While we can’t know for sure, we can make some informed guesses based on current trends and advancements:

1. Advanced Renewable Energy Systems:

Fusion Power: By 2970, fusion power might be a well-established and efficient energy source, providing clean and abundant energy for civilization.
Space-Based Solar Power: Large-scale solar farms in space could beam energy down to Earth, providing a continuous and reliable source of renewable energy.
Advanced Energy Storage: Highly efficient and compact energy storage solutions would likely be available, allowing for the seamless integration of renewable energy sources and powering everything from homes to transportation.

2. Closed-Loop Resource Systems:

Circular Economy: By 2970, the concept of a circular economy would be fully realized, with nearly all materials being reused, recycled, or repurposed.
Advanced Recycling Technologies: Highly efficient recycling technologies would be able to break down materials at a molecular level and reassemble them into new products, minimizing waste and the need for raw materials.
Resource Management Systems: Sophisticated systems would monitor and manage resource flows, ensuring that materials are used efficiently and sustainably.

3. Smart and Sustainable Infrastructure:

Smart Cities: Cities would be highly interconnected and optimized, using data and technology to improve energy efficiency, reduce waste, and enhance quality of life.
Sustainable Transportation: Transportation systems would be fully electric and highly efficient, with advanced public transportation systems and autonomous vehicles.
Green Buildings: Buildings would be designed to be self-sufficient, generating their own energy, managing their own waste, and integrating seamlessly with the natural environment.

4. Biotechnology and Biomimicry:

Biomanufacturing: Advanced biomanufacturing techniques would allow for the production of materials and products using biological systems, reducing the need for fossil fuels and harmful chemicals.
Bioremediation: Biotechnology would be used to clean up pollution and restore damaged ecosystems.
Biomimicry: Technologies would be inspired by nature, mimicking natural processes and designs to create more sustainable solutions.

5. Artificial Intelligence and Automation:

Optimized Systems: AI and automation would be used to optimize energy use, resource management, and other systems, making them more efficient and sustainable.
Precision Agriculture: AI-powered systems would be used to optimize agriculture, reducing water and fertilizer use while increasing yields.
Environmental Monitoring: AI would be used to monitor the environment, detect pollution, and track changes in ecosystems.

6. Space Colonization and Resource Utilization:

Off-World Resources: By 2970, humanity might have established a presence on other planets and moons, utilizing resources from space to supplement those on Earth.
Space-Based Industries: Industries might be located in space to take advantage of abundant solar energy and minimize environmental impact on Earth.

7. Social and Ethical Considerations:

Sustainable Lifestyles: By 2970, sustainable lifestyles would be the norm, with people making conscious choices to minimize their environmental impact.
Global Cooperation: International cooperation would be essential to address global environmental challenges and ensure a sustainable future for all.
Ethical Technology: Technologies would be developed and used in an ethical and responsible manner, considering their potential impacts on society and the environment.

It’s important to remember that this is just speculation. The actual nature of sustainable technology in 2970 could be very different. However, by continuing to innovate and prioritize sustainability, we can create a future where technology and nature coexist in harmony.Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2970 ?

In the year 2970, the need for sustainable technology would be universal, impacting and requiring the participation of virtually all aspects of society. Here’s a breakdown of who would be most reliant on and involved in the development and implementation of sustainable technology:

1. Individuals and Communities:

Consumers: Individuals would rely on sustainable technologies for their daily lives, from energy-efficient homes and transportation to sustainable products and services. They would also play a role in adopting sustainable practices and making conscious choices to minimize their environmental impact.
Local Communities: Communities would benefit from sustainable infrastructure, such as smart grids, efficient waste management systems, and green spaces. They would also be involved in local initiatives to promote sustainability and resilience.

2. Governments and Organizations:

Governments: Governments at all levels would be responsible for setting policies and regulations that promote sustainability, investing in research and development, and ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies.
International Organizations: Global cooperation would be essential to address global environmental challenges and ensure a sustainable future for all. International organizations would play a role in coordinating efforts, sharing knowledge, and promoting sustainable development.

3. Industries and Businesses:

Businesses: Businesses would need to adopt sustainable practices throughout their operations, from sourcing materials and manufacturing products to managing waste and reducing emissions. They would also have opportunities to develop and market sustainable technologies and solutions.
Investors: Investors would play a role in funding the development and deployment of sustainable technologies, driving innovation and supporting the transition to a sustainable economy.

4. Scientists and Engineers:

Researchers: Scientists and engineers would be at the forefront of developing new sustainable technologies, from advanced energy systems and resource management solutions to biomimicry and artificial intelligence applications.
Innovators: Innovators and entrepreneurs would play a key role in bringing sustainable technologies to market, creating new businesses and driving the adoption of sustainable solutions.

5. Educators and Educational Institutions:

Educators: Educators would play a crucial role in raising awareness about sustainability and educating future generations about the importance of sustainable practices and technologies.
Educational Institutions: Educational institutions would need to incorporate sustainability into their curricula and research programs, preparing students for careers in sustainable fields and contributing to the development of new sustainable technologies.

6. Future Generations:

Future Generations: Ultimately, the beneficiaries of sustainable technology in 2970 would be future generations, who would inherit a healthy planet and a sustainable society. They would also have a responsibility to continue the work of their predecessors, ensuring that sustainability remains a priority for centuries to come.

In essence, sustainable technology in 2970 would require a collective effort from all members of society, working together to create a world where technology and nature coexist in harmony.Sources and related content

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2970 ?

This is a tricky question! It’s not about when sustainable technology is required in 2970, but rather that it would need to be a fundamental and integrated part of life by 2970.

Here’s why:

Long-term Sustainability: The very concept of sustainability implies a long-term perspective. For a civilization to thrive for centuries, it would need to have already established and maintained sustainable systems for a very long time.
Evolutionary Process: Technological development is an ongoing process. The sustainable technologies of 2970 wouldn’t just appear overnight. They would be the result of centuries of research, innovation, and implementation.
Planetary Health: The Earth’s resources are finite. If humanity continues to consume resources and generate waste at unsustainable rates, the planet’s ecosystems will eventually collapse. To avoid this, sustainable practices would need to be in place long before 2970 to ensure the planet can support future generations.

In essence, the sustainable technology of 2970 would be the culmination of a long journey towards a harmonious relationship with the planet. It would be a testament to humanity’s ability to learn from the past, adapt to changing conditions, and prioritize the well-being of future generations.

Think of it like building a house. You don’t suddenly decide you need a house in 2970 and start building then. You need to lay the foundation, build the walls, and install the systems long before you can live in it. Similarly, the foundation for sustainable technology in 2970 would need to be laid centuries in advance.Sources and related content

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2970 ?

You’re right to think about the “where” as well! Sustainable technology in 2970 wouldn’t be confined to specific locations. It would need to be integrated into all aspects of human life and across the globe. Here’s a breakdown of the key “where” for sustainable technology in 2970:

1. Urban Centers and Cities:

Smart Cities: Sustainable technology would be at the core of urban planning and development. Cities would be designed to optimize energy use, reduce waste, and minimize environmental impact.
Buildings: Buildings would be self-sufficient, generating their own energy, managing their own waste, and integrating seamlessly with the urban environment.
Transportation: Sustainable transportation systems would be prevalent, with efficient public transportation, electric vehicles, and infrastructure that supports walking and cycling.

2. Rural Areas and Agriculture:

Sustainable Agriculture: Sustainable farming practices would be widespread, minimizing water and fertilizer use, reducing pollution, and maximizing yields.
Renewable Energy: Rural areas would likely be important centers for renewable energy generation, such as wind farms, solar farms, and biomass energy plants.
Ecosystem Preservation: Sustainable technology would be used to protect and restore natural ecosystems, such as forests, wetlands, and grasslands.

3. Industrial and Manufacturing Sectors:

Sustainable Industries: Industries would adopt closed-loop systems, minimizing waste and pollution, and using renewable energy sources.
Biomanufacturing: Biomanufacturing techniques would be used to produce materials and products sustainably, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and harmful chemicals.
Resource Management: Sophisticated systems would manage resource flows, ensuring efficient use and minimizing environmental impact.

4. Homes and Personal Spaces:

Sustainable Homes: Homes would be equipped with smart technologies to optimize energy use, manage waste, and provide clean water.
Sustainable Products: Sustainable products and services would be readily available, allowing individuals to make conscious choices that minimize their environmental footprint.
Personal Technologies: Personal devices and technologies would be designed to be energy-efficient and made from sustainable materials.

5. Space and Beyond:

Space-Based Infrastructure: Sustainable technology would be essential for space exploration and colonization, enabling the utilization of off-world resources and the establishment of self-sustaining settlements.
Space-Based Industries: Industries might be located in space to take advantage of abundant solar energy and minimize environmental impact on Earth.
Planetary Protection: Sustainable technology would be used to protect the environments of other planets and celestial bodies.

6. Global and Interconnected Systems:

Global Networks: Sustainable technology would be integrated into global networks, enabling the sharing of knowledge, resources, and solutions.
Environmental Monitoring: Global monitoring systems would track environmental changes, detect pollution, and provide data to inform decision-making.
International Cooperation: International cooperation would be essential to address global environmental challenges and ensure a sustainable future for all.

In essence, sustainable technology in 2970 would be woven into the fabric of society, permeating all aspects of human life and extending beyond Earth. It would be a testament to humanity’s commitment to creating a world where technology and nature coexist in harmony, ensuring a healthy planet for generations to come.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2970 ?

You’re hitting on a really important point – how do we actually achieve sustainable technology by 2970? It’s not just about imagining the future, but understanding the path to get there. Here’s a breakdown of how sustainable technology would be required to develop over time:

1. Continuous Innovation and Research:

Fundamental Science: Ongoing investment in basic scientific research is crucial. Discoveries in fields like materials science, energy physics, and biotechnology would lay the foundation for future sustainable technologies.
Applied Research and Development: Translating scientific discoveries into practical technologies requires dedicated research and development efforts. This includes designing, prototyping, and testing new sustainable solutions.
Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Sustainable technology requires collaboration across multiple disciplines, including science, engineering, design, and social sciences.

2. Supportive Policies and Regulations:

Incentivizing Sustainability: Governments need to create policies that encourage the development and adoption of sustainable technologies. This could include tax breaks, subsidies, and regulations that favor sustainable practices.
Environmental Protection: Strong environmental regulations are essential to protect natural resources and prevent pollution. This creates a level playing field for businesses and encourages innovation in sustainable solutions.
International Cooperation: Global cooperation is crucial to address global environmental challenges and ensure a sustainable future for all. This includes sharing knowledge, coordinating research efforts, and establishing international standards.

3. Economic and Market Forces:

Sustainable Business Practices: Businesses need to integrate sustainability into their operations, from sourcing materials and manufacturing products to managing waste and reducing emissions.
Consumer Demand: Consumer demand for sustainable products and services can drive innovation and create a market for sustainable technologies.
Investment in Sustainability: Investors play a key role in funding the development and deployment of sustainable technologies, driving innovation and supporting the transition to a sustainable economy.

4. Education and Awareness:

Sustainability Education: Educating future generations about the importance of sustainability and equipping them with the knowledge and skills to develop and implement sustainable solutions is crucial.
Public Awareness: Raising public awareness about environmental challenges and the benefits of sustainable technology can encourage individuals to adopt sustainable practices and support sustainable businesses.

5. Gradual Implementation and Adaptation:

Phased Approach: Implementing sustainable technologies would likely involve a phased approach, starting with pilot projects and gradually scaling up successful solutions.
Adaptive Management: It’s important to monitor the impacts of sustainable technologies and adapt strategies as needed. This requires ongoing evaluation and learning from experience.

6. Ethical and Responsible Development:

Ethical Considerations: Technologies should be developed and used in an ethical and responsible manner, considering their potential impacts on society and the environment.
Social Equity: Sustainable technology should be accessible to all, regardless of income or location. It’s important to ensure that the benefits of sustainable development are shared equitably.

In essence, achieving sustainable technology by 2970 requires a long-term commitment to innovation, collaboration, and responsible development. It’s a journey that starts today, with each step we take towards a more sustainable future laying the foundation for the technologies that will shape the world of 2970 and beyond.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2970 ?

It’s tough to do a traditional “case study” on sustainable technology in 2970 because it’s so far in the future! But, we can create a hypothetical case study based on the trends and predictions we’ve discussed. Let’s imagine a scenario:

Case Study: The City of Aurora – 2970

Background:

By 2970, many cities have transitioned to become highly sustainable and self-sufficient. Aurora is a prime example, a thriving metropolis built on the principles of a circular economy, renewable energy, and smart technology.

The Challenge:

Aurora faced a critical challenge in the mid-28th century: resource depletion. Decades of unsustainable consumption had taken their toll, and the city was struggling to access essential materials and energy.

The Solution:

Aurora embarked on a radical transformation, embracing sustainable technology across all sectors:

Energy: The city transitioned to a fusion-powered grid, supplemented by space-based solar energy beamed down to Earth. Advanced energy storage solutions ensured a reliable and continuous power supply.
Resource Management: Aurora implemented a closed-loop resource system. Advanced recycling technologies broke down waste at a molecular level, allowing for the reuse of nearly all materials. Biomanufacturing facilities produced new products using biological systems, reducing the need for raw materials.
Transportation: The city’s transportation system was completely overhauled. Autonomous electric vehicles and high-speed public transportation systems minimized traffic congestion and pollution. Green spaces and pedestrian-friendly infrastructure encouraged walking and cycling.
Buildings: All buildings in Aurora were redesigned to be self-sufficient. They generated their own energy, managed their own waste, and integrated seamlessly with the urban environment. Vertical farms and green roofs provided fresh food and improved air quality.
Artificial Intelligence: AI systems optimized energy use, managed resource flows, and monitored environmental conditions. AI-powered precision agriculture ensured efficient food production in the city’s surrounding areas.

Results:

Environmental Impact: Aurora significantly reduced its carbon footprint and waste generation. The city’s air and water quality improved dramatically, and biodiversity thrived in the surrounding ecosystems.
Economic Growth: The transition to a sustainable economy created new industries and jobs. Aurora became a hub for green technology and innovation.
Social Well-being: Residents of Aurora enjoyed a high quality of life, with access to clean energy, fresh food, and green spaces. The city became a model for sustainable urban living.

Lessons Learned:

Long-term Vision: The success of Aurora demonstrates the importance of long-term planning and a commitment to sustainability.
Technological Innovation: Continuous investment in research and development is crucial for developing and implementing sustainable technologies.
Systems Thinking: Sustainable solutions require a holistic approach, considering the interconnectedness of different systems and sectors.
Social and Ethical Considerations: It’s essential to ensure that sustainable technologies are developed and used in an ethical and responsible manner, benefiting all members of society.

Conclusion:

The case of Aurora highlights the potential of sustainable technology to transform cities and create a better future. By embracing innovation, collaboration, and a long-term vision, we can build a world where technology and nature coexist in harmony.

While this is a fictional case study, it’s grounded in current trends and advancements. By continuing to prioritize sustainability, we can make this vision a reality, ensuring a healthy planet for generations to come.

courtesy : Bernard Marr

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2970 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 2970 – A Vision for a Harmonious Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 2970, a future shaped by centuries of innovation and a deep understanding of our interconnectedness with the planet. It examines the key technological advancements likely to underpin a sustainable civilization, considering energy, resource management, infrastructure, biotechnology, AI, and the crucial social and ethical frameworks necessary for long-term prosperity. While predicting the future with certainty is impossible, this paper offers a plausible vision based on current trends and the enduring principles of sustainability.

1. Introduction:

The year 2970 represents a culmination of humanity’s ongoing journey towards a harmonious relationship with its environment. Sustainable technology, by this point, will be deeply woven into the fabric of everyday life, not as a separate sector, but as an integrated approach to existence. This paper posits that by 2970, humanity will have moved beyond simply mitigating environmental damage and will have entered an era of actively restoring and enhancing planetary health.

2. Energy: Powering a Sustainable Civilization:

Fusion Energy Dominance: Fusion power, long a promise, will likely be a mature and widely deployed technology, providing clean, abundant, and safe energy.
Space-Based Solar Power: Large-scale solar arrays in orbit will supplement terrestrial energy generation, providing a consistent and reliable source of renewable energy.
Advanced Energy Storage: Highly efficient and compact energy storage solutions will be essential for balancing energy supply and demand, enabling the seamless integration of diverse renewable sources.

3. Resource Management: The Circular Economy in Practice:

Molecular Recycling: Advanced recycling technologies will be capable of breaking down materials to their constituent atoms and molecules, enabling the creation of new products from waste with minimal loss.
Biomanufacturing Revolution: Biological systems will be harnessed to produce materials and products, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and minimizing environmental impact.
Closed-Loop Systems: Industries and communities will operate on closed-loop principles, minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization.

4. Smart and Sustainable Infrastructure:

Sentient Cities: Urban centers will be highly interconnected and optimized, utilizing AI and data analytics to manage energy, water, and other resources efficiently.
Adaptive Buildings: Buildings will be dynamic and responsive to their environment, generating their own energy, managing their own waste, and adapting to changing weather conditions.
Sustainable Transportation Networks: Transportation systems will be fully electric and highly efficient, featuring advanced public transit, autonomous vehicles, and infrastructure that prioritizes walking and cycling.

5. Biotechnology and Biomimicry: Learning from Nature:

Bioremediation and Ecosystem Restoration: Biotechnology will play a crucial role in cleaning up pollution, restoring damaged ecosystems, and enhancing biodiversity.
Biomimetic Technologies: Inspired by nature, technologies will mimic natural processes and designs to create more sustainable solutions in fields ranging from materials science to agriculture.
Precision Agriculture: AI-powered systems will optimize agricultural practices, reducing water and fertilizer use, minimizing environmental impact, and maximizing yields.

6. Artificial Intelligence and Automation: Optimizing Sustainability:

Predictive Modeling and Resource Management: AI will be used to model complex environmental systems, predict resource availability, and optimize resource allocation.
Environmental Monitoring and Protection: AI-powered systems will monitor environmental conditions, detect pollution, and track changes in ecosystems, enabling rapid responses to environmental threats.
Autonomous Systems for Sustainability: Autonomous robots and other systems will be deployed for tasks such as environmental cleanup, resource gathering, and infrastructure maintenance.

7. Social and Ethical Frameworks: The Human Element:

Sustainable Lifestyles: Sustainable practices will be deeply ingrained in everyday life, with individuals making conscious choices to minimize their environmental footprint.
Global Cooperation and Governance: International cooperation will be essential for addressing global environmental challenges and ensuring a sustainable future for all.
Ethical Considerations for Technology: Robust ethical frameworks will guide the development and deployment of sustainable technologies, ensuring that they are used responsibly and benefit all of humanity.

8. Conclusion:

The sustainable technology of 2970 will be the result of centuries of cumulative effort, a testament to humanity’s ability to learn, adapt, and innovate. It will represent a fundamental shift in our relationship with the planet, moving from a paradigm of exploitation to one of stewardship. While the specifics of future technologies remain unknown, the core principles of sustainability – resource efficiency, environmental protection, and social equity – will continue to guide our path towards a harmonious and prosperous future.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2970 ?

You’re thinking ahead! It’s fascinating to imagine how sustainable technology might revolutionize industries in 2970. Here are some potential industrial applications, building on the trends we’ve discussed:

1. Advanced Manufacturing & Production:

Biomanufacturing at Scale: Imagine factories that grow materials instead of mining them. Biomanufacturing, using biological systems, could produce everything from plastics and textiles to construction materials and even electronics, all with minimal environmental impact.
Personalized Production: 3D printing and other additive manufacturing technologies could be highly advanced, allowing for on-demand production of customized goods. This would reduce waste and the need for mass production, leading to more localized and sustainable supply chains.
Closed-Loop Manufacturing: Industries would operate on closed-loop systems, where waste is eliminated and resources are continuously recycled. This would require sophisticated tracking and sorting technologies, as well as advanced recycling and reprocessing facilities.

2. Energy & Resource Industries:

Fusion Power Plants: Fusion energy would be the backbone of industrial power, providing clean and abundant energy for manufacturing, transportation, and other industrial processes.
Space-Based Resource Extraction: Industries might be located in space to access resources from asteroids or other celestial bodies. This would require advanced robotics and autonomous systems, as well as sustainable transportation technologies to move materials back to Earth.
Deep-Sea Mining with Minimal Impact: If deep-sea mining is still necessary, it would be carried out with highly advanced and sustainable technologies that minimize disruption to marine ecosystems.

3. Agriculture & Food Production:

Vertical Farms and Urban Agriculture: Vertical farms and other forms of urban agriculture would be integrated into cities, providing fresh, locally grown food with minimal land and water use.
Precision Agriculture: AI-powered systems would optimize agricultural practices, reducing water and fertilizer use, minimizing environmental impact, and maximizing yields.
Sustainable Food Processing: Food processing facilities would utilize sustainable technologies to reduce waste, conserve energy, and minimize environmental impact.

4. Construction & Infrastructure:

Self-Healing Materials: Buildings and infrastructure could be built with self-healing materials that can repair damage automatically, reducing maintenance costs and extending their lifespan.
Modular Construction: Modular construction techniques would allow for the rapid and efficient assembly of buildings and infrastructure, minimizing waste and environmental impact.
Green Building Materials: Construction would primarily use sustainable and locally sourced materials, such as bioplastics, recycled materials, and sustainably harvested timber.

5. Transportation & Logistics:

Sustainable Transportation Networks: Industries would rely on sustainable transportation systems, including electric vehicles, high-speed trains, and even potentially advanced air transportation, all powered by clean energy sources.
Autonomous Logistics: Autonomous vehicles and drones could be used for efficient and sustainable transportation of goods, optimizing routes and minimizing fuel consumption.

6. Environmental Remediation & Restoration:

Advanced Bioremediation: Biotechnology would be used to clean up pollution from past industrial activities, restoring damaged ecosystems and preventing further environmental degradation.
Climate Engineering: If necessary, advanced technologies might be used to mitigate the effects of climate change, such as carbon capture and storage or solar radiation management.

7. Information & Communication Technologies:

Sustainable Computing: Data centers and other ICT infrastructure would be powered by renewable energy and designed to minimize their environmental footprint.
Green Electronics: Electronic devices would be made from sustainable materials and designed for easy recycling and reuse.

It’s important to remember that these are just potential examples. The actual industrial applications of sustainable technology in 2970 could be very different. However, by continuing to prioritize sustainability and invest in research and development, we can create a future where industries operate in harmony with the environment, contributing to a healthy planet and a prosperous society.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2970 ?

You’re asking about the very engine of progress! Research and development (R&D) is absolutely critical for achieving the kind of sustainable technology we’ve been discussing for 2970. Here’s how that R&D might look, building on current trends and future needs:

1. Fundamental Scientific Research:

Materials Science: Discovering new materials with extraordinary properties will be key. Think of materials that are ultra-strong, lightweight, self-healing, or can capture and store energy with incredible efficiency.
Energy Physics: Continued research into fusion energy is crucial to make it a practical and widely available power source. Exploring other energy sources like advanced geothermal or even harnessing zero-point energy might also be on the agenda.
Biotechnology: Understanding biological systems at a deeper level will unlock new possibilities for biomanufacturing, bioremediation, and even creating artificial ecosystems.
Cognitive Science and AI: Developing artificial intelligence that can not only learn and problem-solve but also understand and adapt to complex environmental systems will be essential for optimizing sustainability.

2. Applied Research and Development:

Energy Technologies: Building on fundamental research, scientists and engineers will need to develop practical fusion reactors, space-based solar power systems, and highly efficient energy storage solutions.
Resource Management: Creating technologies for molecular recycling, biomanufacturing at scale, and developing closed-loop industrial systems will require significant R&D efforts.
Smart Infrastructure: Designing and implementing sentient cities, adaptive buildings, and sustainable transportation networks will involve integrating various technologies and optimizing them for efficiency and sustainability.
Biotechnology Applications: Translating biological discoveries into practical applications, such as bioremediation technologies, biomimetic materials, and precision agriculture systems, will require dedicated R&D.
AI for Sustainability: Developing AI systems that can model complex environmental systems, predict resource availability, and optimize resource allocation will be crucial for managing sustainability on a large scale.

3. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

Bridging Disciplines: Sustainable technology requires collaboration across various fields, including science, engineering, design, social sciences, and even the arts. Researchers will need to work together to create holistic solutions that address both technological and social challenges.
Open Innovation: Sharing knowledge and collaborating with researchers from around the world will accelerate the development of sustainable technologies. Open-source platforms and international research partnerships will play a key role.

4. Future-Oriented Research:

Long-Term Vision: R&D for sustainable technology in 2970 will require a long-term perspective, anticipating future challenges and developing solutions well in advance.
Scenario Planning: Researchers will need to consider various scenarios for the future, including potential environmental changes, resource limitations, and social trends, to develop robust and adaptable technologies.
Ethical Considerations: R&D will need to incorporate ethical considerations from the beginning, ensuring that new technologies are developed and used responsibly, with respect for both human society and the environment.

5. Continuous Improvement and Adaptation:

Monitoring and Evaluation: Sustainable technologies will need to be continuously monitored and evaluated to assess their impacts and identify areas for improvement.
Adaptive Management: R&D will need to be flexible and adaptive, responding to new challenges and opportunities as they arise.
Learning from Nature: Nature will continue to be a source of inspiration for sustainable technology. Researchers will study natural systems to learn how to create more efficient, resilient, and sustainable technologies.

In essence, the research and development of sustainable technology for 2970 will be an ongoing process, driven by curiosity, collaboration, and a deep commitment to creating a better future for all. It will be a journey of discovery, innovation, and adaptation, ensuring that humanity can thrive in harmony with the planet for centuries to come.

courtesy : NPTEL-NOC IITM

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.