Sustainable Technology of 2960

Leave a Comment / Blog / By

Sustainable Technology of 2960 ?

It’s difficult to predict the exact nature of sustainable technology in 2960, as it’s over 900 years in the future. However, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and potential future developments:

Possible Sustainable Technology Trends in 2960:

  • Advanced Energy Systems:
    • Fusion Power: Potentially a primary energy source, providing clean and abundant energy.  
    • Space-Based Solar Power: Collecting solar energy in space and beaming it to Earth.  
    • Advanced Energy Storage: Highly efficient and long-lasting batteries or other storage solutions.
  • Closed-Loop Resource Systems:
    • Circular Economy: Near-total recycling and reuse of materials, minimizing waste.
    • Advanced Biomanufacturing: Creating materials and products from biological sources, potentially even growing them.
    • Atmospheric Carbon Capture: Large-scale removal of CO2 from the atmosphere.
  • Sustainable Infrastructure:
    • Smart Cities: Highly efficient urban centers with optimized resource use.  
    • Vertical Farms: High-rise, controlled-environment agriculture for local food production.
    • Advanced Transportation: Hyperloops, flying vehicles, or other highly efficient and sustainable transport systems.
  • Environmental Restoration:
    • Geoengineering: Technologies to actively manage the Earth’s climate system.  
    • Ecosystem Restoration: Advanced techniques to repair damaged ecosystems.
    • De-extinction: Bringing back extinct species to restore biodiversity.
  • Sustainable Computing:
    • Quantum Computing: Potentially revolutionizing computing with vastly increased efficiency.  
    • Neuromorphic Computing: Computers that mimic the human brain, potentially highly energy-efficient.  
    • Data Centers in Space: Cooling and energy efficiency advantages in the vacuum of space.

Important Considerations:

  • Technological Singularity: If artificial intelligence surpasses human intelligence, it could lead to unpredictable technological advancements, including in sustainability.
  • Resource Availability: Even with advanced technology, resource scarcity could be a limiting factor.
  • Social and Political Factors: The development and adoption of sustainable technology will depend on societal values and political decisions.

It’s important to remember that this is just speculation. The future of technology is uncertain, and there may be breakthroughs we cannot even imagine today. However, by continuing to innovate and prioritize sustainability, we can increase the chances of a positive future for humanity and the planet.Sources and related content

What is Sustainable Technology of 2960 ?

Predicting the exact nature of sustainable technology in 2960 is a fascinating thought experiment! While it’s impossible to know for sure, we can explore some potential trends and possibilities based on current advancements and future projections.

Here are some areas where sustainable technology might make significant strides by 2960:

  • Energy:
    • Fusion Power: If we manage to harness fusion, it could become a primary energy source, providing clean and abundant power.  
    • Space-Based Solar Power: Collecting solar energy in space and beaming it down to Earth could become a viable option.
    • Advanced Energy Storage: We might see the development of highly efficient and long-lasting batteries or other energy storage solutions.
  • Resource Management:
    • Circular Economy: By 2960, we might have achieved a near-total circular economy, where resources are continuously recycled and reused, minimizing waste.
    • Biomanufacturing: Imagine creating materials and products from biological sources, potentially even growing them!
    • Atmospheric Carbon Capture: Large-scale technologies could be developed to remove CO2 from the atmosphere, helping to combat climate change.
  • Infrastructure:
    • Smart Cities: Urban centers could become highly efficient, with optimized resource use and minimal environmental impact.
    • Vertical Farms: High-rise, controlled-environment agriculture could become commonplace, allowing for local food production and reducing transportation needs.
    • Advanced Transportation: We might see the development of hyperloops, flying vehicles, or other highly efficient and sustainable transportation systems.
  • Environmental Restoration:
    • Geoengineering: Technologies to actively manage the Earth’s climate system could be developed and deployed.
    • Ecosystem Restoration: Advanced techniques might allow us to repair damaged ecosystems and even bring back extinct species.
  • Computing:
    • Quantum Computing: This could revolutionize computing, leading to vastly increased efficiency and potentially solving problems that are currently intractable.
    • Neuromorphic Computing: Computers that mimic the human brain could be developed, potentially leading to highly energy-efficient computing.
    • Space-Based Data Centers: Placing data centers in space could offer advantages in cooling and energy efficiency.  

Important Considerations:

  • Technological Singularity: If artificial intelligence surpasses human intelligence, it could lead to unpredictable technological advancements, including in sustainability.
  • Resource Availability: Even with advanced technology, resource scarcity could be a limiting factor.
  • Social and Political Factors: The development and adoption of sustainable technology will depend on societal values and political decisions.

It’s important to remember that this is just speculation. The future of technology is uncertain, and there may be breakthroughs we cannot even imagine today. However, by continuing to innovate and prioritize sustainability, we can increase the chances of a positive future for humanity and the planet.Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2960 ?

In 2960, the need for sustainable technology will likely be universal, impacting every aspect of life and society. However, some key areas and stakeholders will have a particularly strong need for it:

  • Governments and policymakers: They will be responsible for creating and enforcing regulations that promote sustainability, investing in research and development, and ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies.
  • Businesses and industries: They will need to adopt sustainable practices throughout their operations, from sourcing materials to manufacturing and distribution. This will be crucial for reducing their environmental footprint and ensuring long-term viability.  
  • Individuals and communities: Everyone will play a role in adopting sustainable lifestyles, making informed choices about consumption, and participating in initiatives that promote sustainability.
  • Scientists and engineers: They will be at the forefront of developing new sustainable technologies, improving existing ones, and finding innovative solutions to environmental challenges.
  • Environmental organizations and activists: They will continue to raise awareness about environmental issues, advocate for policy changes, and hold governments and businesses accountable for their actions.

Specific needs that sustainable technology will address in 2960:

  • Climate change mitigation and adaptation: Technologies for carbon capture, renewable energy, and climate resilience will be crucial for addressing the ongoing impacts of climate change.
  • Resource scarcity: As resources become more scarce, technologies for recycling, resource efficiency, and alternative materials will be essential.
  • Environmental pollution: Technologies for pollution control, waste management, and ecosystem restoration will be needed to address the legacy of past environmental damage.
  • Population growth and urbanization: Sustainable technologies will be needed to support a growing population and ensure that cities are livable and environmentally friendly.
  • Global equity: Sustainable technologies will need to be accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status, to ensure a just and equitable future.

Ultimately, the need for sustainable technology in 2960 will be driven by the ongoing challenges of environmental sustainability, resource limitations, and the need to create a better future for all. It will require a collective effort from all stakeholders to develop, implement, and embrace sustainable solutions.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2960 ?

The need for sustainable technology in 2960 is not a question of “when” but rather “how urgently and comprehensively.” It’s not a single event or deadline, but an ongoing imperative. Here’s why:

  • Continuous Evolution of Challenges: Even if we make significant progress in sustainability by 2960, new challenges will likely emerge. These could be related to resource depletion, new forms of pollution, or unforeseen consequences of technological advancements. Sustainable technology will need to continuously adapt and evolve to address these new issues.
  • Legacy of Past Actions: The effects of past environmental damage and resource exploitation may still be felt in 2960. Sustainable technology will be needed to remediate this legacy, restore ecosystems, and mitigate the ongoing impacts of climate change.
  • Maintaining Equilibrium: Sustainable technology will be essential for maintaining a balance between human needs and the Earth’s capacity to support life. This will require ongoing efforts to manage resources, minimize waste, and ensure that human activities do not exceed the planet’s limits.  
  • Ensuring Equity: Sustainable technology will be needed to ensure that everyone has access to the resources and opportunities they need to thrive, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status. This will require ongoing efforts to promote equitable development and address disparities in access to technology.

Therefore, the need for sustainable technology in 2960 is not a one-time event but a continuous requirement. It will be an integral part of how societies function, how economies operate, and how individuals live their lives. It will require a long-term commitment to innovation, adaptation, and responsible stewardship of the planet.

In essence, sustainable technology in 2960 will be necessary to ensure the long-term well-being of humanity and the planet. It will be an ongoing process of addressing challenges, adapting to change, and striving for a more sustainable future.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2960 ?

You’re right to think about where sustainable technology will be needed in 2960! It won’t be confined to specific locations, but rather integrated into nearly every aspect of human life and across the globe. Here are some key areas and locations where it will be essential:

  • Urban Centers: Cities will likely be hubs of sustainable technology, with smart grids, efficient transportation systems, vertical farms, and advanced waste management facilities.
  • Rural Areas: Sustainable technology will be crucial for food production, water management, and off-grid energy solutions in rural communities.
  • Industrial Zones: Sustainable manufacturing processes, closed-loop resource systems, and pollution control technologies will be essential in industrial areas.
  • Transportation Networks: Sustainable transportation systems, including hyperloops, flying vehicles, and electric vehicle infrastructure, will be needed to connect people and goods efficiently and with minimal environmental impact.
  • Energy Infrastructure: Sustainable energy generation and distribution systems, including fusion power plants, space-based solar farms, and advanced energy storage facilities, will be essential to power societies.
  • Natural Environments: Sustainable technology will be needed to protect and restore natural ecosystems, including forests, oceans, and deserts. This could involve techniques for ecosystem restoration, pollution remediation, and climate change mitigation.
  • Space: As humanity expands its presence in space, sustainable technology will be crucial for resource utilization, waste management, and creating self-sustaining habitats.  

Beyond physical locations, sustainable technology will also be needed in:

  • Homes and workplaces: Sustainable appliances, energy-efficient buildings, and smart home systems will help individuals and organizations reduce their environmental footprint.  
  • Communication and information systems: Sustainable computing technologies, such as quantum computing and neuromorphic computing, will be needed to power the digital world efficiently.
  • Healthcare systems: Sustainable technologies will be needed for medical waste management, energy-efficient healthcare facilities, and the development of environmentally friendly medical devices.

Ultimately, sustainable technology in 2960 will be needed everywhere that human activity interacts with the environment. It will be an integral part of how we live, work, and interact with the planet.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2960 ?

The “how” of required sustainable technology in 2960 is a complex question, encompassing development, implementation, and societal integration. It’s not just about inventing things, but about creating a system where sustainability is woven into the fabric of daily life. Here’s a breakdown:

1. Continuous Innovation and Research:

  • Fundamental Scientific Breakthroughs: Continued investment in basic science will be crucial for discovering new materials, energy sources, and processes. Think quantum computing, advanced biomanufacturing, and potentially even harnessing new fundamental forces of nature.
  • Engineering and Applied Science: Translating scientific discoveries into practical technologies will require robust engineering and applied science. This includes designing efficient systems, optimizing processes, and scaling up production.
  • Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Solving complex sustainability challenges will require collaboration between scientists, engineers, social scientists, and other experts.  

2. Systemic Thinking and Design:

  • Closed-Loop Systems: Moving towards a truly circular economy will require designing products and systems for disassembly, reuse, and recycling from the outset. This will minimize waste and resource depletion.  
  • Integration and Optimization: Sustainable technologies will need to be integrated seamlessly into existing infrastructure and systems. Smart grids, smart cities, and optimized transportation networks will be essential.
  • Resilience and Adaptability: Sustainable systems will need to be resilient to shocks and disruptions, such as climate change impacts or resource scarcity. They will also need to be adaptable to changing conditions.

3. Societal and Political Factors:

  • Policy and Regulation: Governments will play a crucial role in setting standards, incentivizing sustainable practices, and regulating harmful activities. International cooperation will be essential for addressing global challenges.  
  • Education and Awareness: Educating the public about sustainability and empowering individuals to make informed choices will be critical. This includes promoting sustainable lifestyles and fostering a sense of environmental responsibility.
  • Economic Incentives: Creating economic incentives for sustainable practices will be essential for driving adoption. This could include carbon pricing, subsidies for renewable energy, and other market-based mechanisms.
  • Ethical Considerations: As technology advances, it will be important to consider the ethical implications of new technologies and ensure that they are used responsibly. This includes addressing issues of equity, access, and potential unintended consequences.

4. Global Collaboration and Equity:

  • Technology Transfer: Sharing sustainable technologies and knowledge across borders will be essential for addressing global challenges.
  • Capacity Building: Supporting developing countries in building their own sustainable technology infrastructure will be crucial for ensuring a just and equitable transition.
  • Global Governance: Strengthening international institutions and agreements will be necessary for addressing global environmental challenges, such as climate change and resource depletion.  

In short, the “how” of achieving sustainable technology in 2960 will require a multifaceted approach that combines scientific innovation, systemic thinking, societal engagement, and global cooperation. It will be an ongoing process of learning, adapting, and working together to create a more sustainable future.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2960 ?

It’s tricky to give a specific case study for sustainable technology in 2960, as that’s so far in the future! But, we can create a hypothetical case study based on the trends we’ve discussed, to illustrate what it might look like:

Case Study: The Revitalization of the Amazon Rainforest in 2960

The Challenge: By the mid-28th century, despite efforts, the Amazon rainforest had suffered significant deforestation and biodiversity loss due to centuries of unsustainable practices. Climate change had exacerbated the problem, leading to altered rainfall patterns and increased risk of wildfires.

The Solution: In 2960, a global initiative was launched to fully restore the Amazon ecosystem. This involved a multi-pronged approach using advanced sustainable technologies:

  • Advanced Biomanufacturing: Drones equipped with advanced biomanufacturing technology were deployed to reforest degraded areas. These drones could analyze soil composition, seed distribution, and even “grow” specific tree species in situ, accelerating the reforestation process.
  • Climate Engineering: Localized micro-climate control technologies were used to restore historical rainfall patterns and mitigate the risk of wildfires. This involved carefully manipulating atmospheric conditions using advanced energy-efficient systems.
  • Ecosystem Restoration: Nanobots were deployed to cleanse polluted waterways and restore soil health. These nanobots could break down pollutants, deliver nutrients to plants, and even repair damaged DNA in endangered species.
  • Sustainable Agriculture: Local communities were trained in advanced agroforestry techniques, combining food production with reforestation. Vertical farms were established in strategic locations to provide sustainable food sources and reduce pressure on the rainforest ecosystem.
  • Renewable Energy Integration: The entire restoration project was powered by a network of interconnected renewable energy sources, including space-based solar power and localized fusion micro-reactors.

The Outcome: By 2960, the Amazon rainforest had been largely restored to its former glory. Biodiversity flourished, rainfall patterns returned to normal, and the region became a carbon sink, contributing to global climate change mitigation. The project served as a model for ecosystem restoration efforts around the world.

Key Sustainable Technologies Highlighted:

  • Advanced Biomanufacturing: For rapid and targeted reforestation.
  • Localized Climate Engineering: For precise environmental control.
  • Nanotechnology: For pollution remediation and ecosystem repair.
  • Advanced Agroforestry: For sustainable food production and ecosystem preservation.
  • Renewable Energy Integration: To power the entire initiative sustainably.

Lessons Learned:

  • Long-term Vision: The success of the project required a long-term commitment and sustained effort over many decades.
  • Global Collaboration: International cooperation was essential for mobilizing resources, sharing knowledge, and coordinating efforts.
  • Technological Innovation: Advanced sustainable technologies played a crucial role in achieving the project’s goals.
  • Community Engagement: The involvement of local communities was essential for ensuring the long-term sustainability of the restored ecosystem.

This hypothetical case study illustrates how a combination of advanced sustainable technologies, long-term vision, and global collaboration could be used to address complex environmental challenges in the future.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2960 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 2960: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract: This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 2960. While precise predictions are impossible, we can extrapolate from current trends and envision how advancements in science, engineering, and societal structures might converge to create a world where human civilization thrives in harmony with the planet. This paper examines potential technological breakthroughs, societal shifts, and ethical considerations that will shape the future of sustainability.

1. Introduction:

The concept of sustainability has evolved from a concern about resource depletion to a holistic understanding of the interconnectedness of human society and the natural world. By 2960, sustainable technology will likely be deeply integrated into every facet of human existence, from energy production and resource management to transportation, communication, and even space exploration. This paper aims to paint a potential picture of this future, acknowledging the inherent uncertainties while exploring plausible pathways.

2. Key Technological Domains:

Several technological domains are poised to revolutionize sustainability by 2960:

  • Energy: Fusion power, space-based solar energy, and highly efficient energy storage solutions will likely form the backbone of a clean and abundant energy system. Micro-reactors and localized energy generation will empower communities and reduce reliance on centralized grids.
  • Resource Management: A true circular economy will be realized through advanced biomanufacturing, near-total recycling, and innovative material science. Resource scarcity will be largely mitigated through closed-loop systems and the development of sustainable alternatives.
  • Infrastructure: Smart cities, powered by AI and interconnected networks, will optimize resource usage and minimize environmental impact. Vertical farms and localized food production will reduce transportation needs and enhance food security. Advanced transportation systems, such as hyperloops and potentially even personal air mobility, will be efficient and sustainable.
  • Environmental Restoration: Geoengineering technologies, carefully managed and deployed, may play a role in mitigating the effects of past environmental damage. Advanced ecosystem restoration techniques, including nanobots and targeted biomanufacturing, will allow for the revitalization of damaged ecosystems.
  • Computing: Quantum and neuromorphic computing will revolutionize processing power while dramatically reducing energy consumption. Data centers in space, leveraging the vacuum for cooling, may become a viable option.

3. Societal and Ethical Considerations:

Technological advancements alone are insufficient to guarantee a sustainable future. Crucial societal and ethical considerations must guide development and implementation:

  • Global Equity: Ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies and resources will be paramount. Bridging the gap between developed and developing nations will be essential for achieving global sustainability.
  • Governance and Regulation: Robust international frameworks will be necessary to manage the use of powerful technologies, such as geoengineering, and to prevent unintended consequences.
  • Ethical AI: As AI becomes increasingly integrated into sustainable systems, ethical considerations regarding its development and deployment will be crucial. Transparency, accountability, and human oversight will be essential.
  • Education and Awareness: Cultivating a global citizenry that understands and values sustainability will be crucial for long-term success. Education and awareness campaigns will play a vital role in fostering a sense of environmental responsibility.

4. Challenges and Opportunities:

The path to a sustainable future in 2960 will not be without its challenges:

  • Unforeseen Consequences: Technological advancements can have unintended consequences. Careful risk assessment and adaptive management will be essential.
  • Resource Constraints: Even with advanced technology, certain resources may remain scarce. Innovation and resource efficiency will be crucial.
  • Social and Political Resistance: Shifts towards sustainability may face resistance from vested interests. Effective communication and public engagement will be necessary to overcome these challenges.

Despite these challenges, the opportunities are immense. A sustainable future offers the potential for a thriving global society, a healthy planet, and a more equitable world.

5. Conclusion:

The year 2960 represents a distant horizon, but the choices we make today will shape that future. By investing in research and development, fostering global collaboration, and prioritizing ethical considerations, we can pave the way for a world where sustainable technology empowers humanity to live in harmony with the planet for generations to come. This vision requires a long-term perspective, a commitment to innovation, and a deep understanding of the interconnectedness of all living things. The journey towards a sustainable future is a continuous process, and the year 2960 represents just one milestone on that path.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2960 ?

Let’s imagine some industrial applications of sustainable technology in 2960, building upon the trends we’ve discussed:

1. Advanced Biomanufacturing for Materials Production:

  • Scenario: Imagine a factory that “grows” its products. Instead of traditional manufacturing processes, biomanufacturing uses engineered biological systems (think highly advanced, specialized cells or even entire organisms) to produce materials on demand.  
  • Application: This could revolutionize industries from construction (growing self-repairing buildings) to textiles (producing fabrics with specific properties at the molecular level) to electronics (creating biodegradable and recyclable components). Imagine “printing” a car chassis from a bio-engineered tree that’s been programmed to produce the necessary materials in the right shape.
  • Sustainability: This minimizes waste, reduces reliance on fossil fuels, and allows for the creation of materials with tailored properties for specific applications.

2. Closed-Loop Resource Systems for Manufacturing:

  • Scenario: Factories operate within a completely closed-loop system. Every material used is either incorporated into the final product or recycled and reused within the factory itself. Advanced sorting and decomposition technologies break down waste products into their constituent elements, which are then used to create new products.
  • Application: This could apply to any industry, from the production of consumer goods to the manufacturing of complex machinery. Imagine a factory that produces electronics, where every component, at the end of its life, is broken down and used to create new devices.
  • Sustainability: This eliminates the concept of waste, conserves resources, and reduces the environmental impact of manufacturing.

3. Space-Based Solar Power for Industrial Processes:

  • Scenario: Industries are powered by clean energy beamed down from space-based solar power stations. These stations collect solar energy in the vacuum of space, where it is far more abundant and consistent, and then transmit it to Earth as concentrated energy beams.  
  • Application: This could power energy-intensive industries like aluminum production, steel manufacturing, and chemical processing. Imagine a steel mill powered entirely by clean energy from space, drastically reducing its carbon footprint.
  • Sustainability: This provides a virtually inexhaustible source of clean energy, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and mitigating climate change.

4. AI-Powered Optimization for Industrial Efficiency:

  • Scenario: AI systems manage and optimize every aspect of industrial operations, from resource allocation and production planning to energy consumption and waste management. These AI systems can predict demand, optimize supply chains, and identify areas for improvement in real-time.  
  • Application: This could apply to any industry, improving efficiency and reducing waste. Imagine a chemical plant where AI constantly monitors and adjusts the production process to minimize energy use and maximize yields.
  • Sustainability: This leads to more efficient use of resources, reduces energy consumption, and minimizes environmental impact.

5. Nanotechnology for Pollution Remediation in Industrial Areas:

  • Scenario: Nanobots are deployed to clean up pollution in industrial areas. These nanobots can break down pollutants, neutralize toxins, and even repair damaged ecosystems.
  • Application: This could be used to clean up contaminated soil and water, restore damaged ecosystems, and mitigate the environmental impact of past industrial activities. Imagine a heavily polluted industrial site being restored to a healthy ecosystem using nanotechnology.
  • Sustainability: This allows for the remediation of past environmental damage and helps to create a cleaner and healthier environment.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology might be applied in industry in 2960. The key themes are resource efficiency, clean energy, closed-loop systems, and the use of advanced technologies like biomanufacturing, AI, and nanotechnology to create a more sustainable industrial landscape.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2960 ?

It’s fascinating to consider the research and development that might lead to the sustainable technologies of 2960! While we can’t know for sure, here are some potential areas of focus, building on current scientific trends:

1. Advanced Materials Science:

  • Goal: Developing materials with unprecedented properties: super-strength, self-healing, biodegradable, adaptable to their environment, etc.
  • Research:
    • Biomimicry: Studying natural materials and processes to inspire new designs (e.g., how spider silk achieves its strength, how plants capture solar energy).  
    • Nanotechnology: Manipulating matter at the atomic and molecular level to create materials with specific properties.  
    • Synthetic Biology: Engineering biological systems to produce new materials or modify existing ones.  

2. Energy Systems:

  • Goal: Achieving clean, abundant, and universally accessible energy.
  • Research:
    • Fusion Energy: Overcoming the challenges of containing and controlling fusion reactions to generate power.  
    • Space-Based Solar Power: Developing efficient ways to collect solar energy in space and transmit it to Earth.  
    • Advanced Energy Storage: Creating batteries or other storage solutions with much higher energy density, longer lifespan, and faster charging times.  
    • Direct Energy Conversion: Exploring ways to convert energy from sources like sunlight or ambient heat directly into electricity with minimal loss.

3. Environmental Science and Engineering:

  • Goal: Understanding and restoring Earth’s ecosystems, mitigating climate change.
  • Research:
    • Geoengineering: Investigating methods to safely and effectively manage the Earth’s climate system (e.g., carbon capture, solar radiation management).
    • Ecosystem Restoration: Developing advanced techniques to repair damaged ecosystems and restore biodiversity.
    • Bioremediation: Using biological systems to clean up pollution and restore contaminated environments.  

4. Computing and Artificial Intelligence:

  • Goal: Developing highly efficient and sustainable computing technologies, using AI to optimize resource use.
  • Research:
    • Quantum Computing: Exploring the potential of quantum mechanics to create computers that are vastly more powerful than classical computers.  
    • Neuromorphic Computing: Designing computers that mimic the structure and function of the human brain, potentially leading to highly energy-efficient computing.  
    • AI for Sustainability: Developing AI systems that can optimize energy grids, manage resources, and monitor environmental conditions.  

5. Space Exploration and Resource Utilization:

  • Goal: Expanding humanity’s presence in space, accessing resources beyond Earth.
  • Research:
    • In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU): Developing technologies to extract and use resources from asteroids, planets, or other celestial bodies.
    • Space-Based Manufacturing: Creating systems for manufacturing products in space, reducing the need to transport materials from Earth.
    • Closed-Loop Life Support Systems: Designing systems that can recycle air, water, and waste in space habitats, enabling long-duration space missions.

Important Considerations for R&D:

  • Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Addressing complex sustainability challenges will require collaboration between scientists, engineers, social scientists, and other experts.
  • Ethical Considerations: It will be crucial to consider the ethical implications of new technologies and ensure that they are used responsibly.
  • Long-Term Vision: Research and development for sustainable technology requires a long-term perspective and a commitment to sustained investment.

The research and development that will lead to the sustainable technologies of 2960 is happening today. By continuing to invest in these areas and fostering a culture of innovation, we can increase the chances of creating a future where humanity and the planet thrive together.

COURTESY : Voith Group

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
  53. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
  77. ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
  96. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
  107. ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »