Sustainable Technology of 2980

Sustainable Technology of 2980 ?

Sustainable technology in 2980 is a fascinating concept! While it’s impossible to predict the future with certainty, we can explore some potential directions based on current trends and advancements:

1. Advanced Energy Solutions:

Fusion Power: By 2980, fusion power might be a widely available and safe energy source, providing clean and abundant electricity.
Space-Based Solar Power: Solar energy could be collected in space and beamed down to Earth, providing a continuous and inexhaustible supply.
Hyper-Efficient Energy Storage: Breakthroughs in battery technology or other storage methods could enable seamless integration of renewable energy sources.

2. Resource Optimization:

Circular Economy: Advanced recycling and material science could enable a truly circular economy, minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization.
3D Printing with Recycled Materials: On-demand manufacturing using recycled materials could reduce the need for resource extraction and transportation.
Precision Agriculture: Technologies like AI and robotics could optimize food production, reducing water and fertilizer usage while increasing yields.

3. Environmental Remediation:

Carbon Capture and Sequestration: Advanced technologies could efficiently remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and store it safely.
Ocean Cleanup and Restoration: Robots and other tools could be used to remove pollutants from the oceans and restore marine ecosystems.
Geoengineering: If necessary, carefully designed geoengineering techniques might be used to mitigate climate change impacts.

4. Smart Infrastructure:

Self-Healing Materials: Infrastructure made from self-healing materials could automatically repair damage, reducing maintenance needs and extending lifespan.
Smart Grids: Intelligent power grids could optimize energy distribution and prevent outages.
Sustainable Transportation: Advanced transportation systems, such as high-speed trains and electric vehicles, could minimize emissions and congestion.

5. Biotechnology and Biomimicry:

Biomanufacturing: Using biological processes to produce materials and products could reduce reliance on fossil fuels and harmful chemicals.
Bioremediation: Microorganisms could be used to clean up pollution and restore ecosystems.
Biomimicry: Designing technologies inspired by nature could lead to more efficient and sustainable solutions.

6. Artificial Intelligence and Automation:

AI-Powered Optimization: AI could be used to optimize energy use, resource allocation, and other processes across industries and cities.
Autonomous Systems: Robots and other autonomous systems could perform tasks in hazardous or remote environments, reducing human risk and environmental impact.

7. Space Colonization and Resource Utilization:

Off-World Resource Extraction: Mining resources from asteroids or other celestial bodies could reduce pressure on Earth’s resources.
Space-Based Manufacturing: Manufacturing in space could take advantage of unique conditions like zero gravity and vacuum.

Important Considerations:

Ethical Implications: As technology advances, it’s crucial to consider the ethical implications of its use and ensure it benefits all of humanity.
Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity will require international cooperation and shared responsibility.
Resilience: Sustainable technologies should be designed to be resilient to natural disasters and other disruptions.

It’s important to remember that this is just a glimpse into the potential of sustainable technology in 2980. The future is full of possibilities, and the choices we make today will shape the world of tomorrow. By investing in research and development, fostering innovation, and prioritizing sustainability, we can create a brighter future for generations to come.Sources and related content

What is Sustainable Technology of 2980 ?

Sustainable technology in 2980 is likely to be far more advanced and integrated into our lives than anything we can imagine today. Here are some potential aspects:

1. Energy:

Fusion Power: Safe, clean, and abundant fusion energy could be the primary power source, eliminating reliance on fossil fuels.
Space-Based Solar: Solar energy collected in space and beamed to Earth could provide a continuous and inexhaustible supply.
Hyper-Efficient Energy Storage: Breakthroughs in battery tech or other storage methods could enable seamless integration of renewable sources.

2. Resources:

Circular Economy: Advanced recycling and material science could enable a truly circular economy, minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization.
3D Printing with Recycled Materials: On-demand manufacturing using recycled materials could reduce the need for resource extraction and transportation.
Precision Agriculture: Technologies like AI and robotics could optimize food production, reducing water and fertilizer usage while increasing yields.

3. Environment:

Carbon Capture and Sequestration: Advanced technologies could efficiently remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and store it safely.
Ocean Cleanup and Restoration: Robots and other tools could be used to remove pollutants from the oceans and restore marine ecosystems.
Geoengineering: If necessary, carefully designed geoengineering techniques might be used to mitigate climate change impacts.

4. Infrastructure:

Self-Healing Materials: Infrastructure made from self-healing materials could automatically repair damage, reducing maintenance needs and extending lifespan.
Smart Grids: Intelligent power grids could optimize energy distribution and prevent outages.
Sustainable Transportation: Advanced transportation systems, such as high-speed trains and electric vehicles, could minimize emissions and congestion.

5. Biotechnology:

Biomanufacturing: Using biological processes to produce materials and products could reduce reliance on fossil fuels and harmful chemicals.
Bioremediation: Microorganisms could be used to clean up pollution and restore ecosystems.
Biomimicry: Designing technologies inspired by nature could lead to more efficient and sustainable solutions.

6. AI and Automation:

AI-Powered Optimization: AI could be used to optimize energy use, resource allocation, and other processes across industries and cities.
Autonomous Systems: Robots and other autonomous systems could perform tasks in hazardous or remote environments, reducing human risk and environmental impact.

7. Space:

Off-World Resource Extraction: Mining resources from asteroids or other celestial bodies could reduce pressure on Earth’s resources.
Space-Based Manufacturing: Manufacturing in space could take advantage of unique conditions like zero gravity and vacuum.

Important Considerations:

Ethical Implications: As technology advances, it’s crucial to consider the ethical implications of its use and ensure it benefits all of humanity.
Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity will require international cooperation and shared responsibility.
Resilience: Sustainable technologies should be designed to be resilient to natural disasters and other disruptions.

This is just a glimpse into the potential of sustainable technology in 2980. The future is full of possibilities, and the choices we make today will shape the world of tomorrow. By investing in research and development, fostering innovation, and prioritizing sustainability, we can create a brighter future for generations to come.Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2980 ?

It’s more accurate to say that everyone will be required to participate in and benefit from sustainable technology in 2980. Here’s why:

Resource Scarcity: Even with advanced technology, Earth’s resources are finite. By 2980, sustainable practices will be essential to ensure everyone has access to basic necessities like energy, food, and clean water.
Environmental Concerns: Climate change and pollution will likely still be significant issues. Sustainable technology will be crucial for mitigating these problems and creating a healthy environment for all.
Economic Stability: A sustainable economy will be necessary for long-term prosperity. This means using resources efficiently, minimizing waste, and creating a circular economy that benefits everyone.
Social Equity: Sustainable technology should be used to address social inequalities and ensure everyone has access to the same opportunities. This includes access to education, healthcare, and other essential services.

Here’s how different groups might be involved:

Individuals: Will need to adopt sustainable lifestyles, making conscious choices about consumption, transportation, and energy use.
Governments: Will need to create policies that promote sustainability, invest in research and development, and regulate industries to minimize environmental impact.
Businesses: Will need to adopt sustainable practices throughout their operations, from sourcing materials to manufacturing and distribution.
Scientists and Engineers: Will need to develop new sustainable technologies and find innovative solutions to environmental challenges.
Educators: Will need to teach future generations about sustainability and empower them to create a more sustainable world.

Ultimately, sustainable technology in 2980 will require a collective effort from everyone on the planet. It will be a way of life, integrated into every aspect of society to ensure a healthy, prosperous, and equitable future for all.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2980 ?

While the specific technologies of 2980 are speculative, the need for sustainable technology is now. It’s not something we can postpone until the distant future. Here’s why:

Urgent Environmental Challenges: Climate change, resource depletion, and pollution are pressing issues that demand immediate action. Delaying the development and implementation of sustainable technologies will only worsen these problems.
Long-Term Planning: Developing truly sustainable solutions often requires long-term research, development, and infrastructure changes. Starting now is crucial to ensure these technologies are ready when we need them most.
Building a Sustainable Foundation: The decisions we make today will shape the world of tomorrow. Investing in sustainable technology now will lay the foundation for a more sustainable future in 2980 and beyond.

Here’s how the need for sustainable technology is urgent today:

Climate Change Mitigation: We need to drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions to limit the impacts of climate change. This requires transitioning to renewable energy sources, improving energy efficiency, and developing carbon capture technologies.
Resource Management: We need to use resources more efficiently and move towards a circular economy to reduce waste and minimize environmental impact. This involves developing new materials, improving recycling processes, and promoting sustainable consumption patterns.
Environmental Protection: We need to protect and restore ecosystems, reduce pollution, and conserve biodiversity. This requires developing new technologies for environmental remediation, sustainable agriculture, and conservation.

In conclusion:

The need for sustainable technology is not something that can be deferred to 2980. It is a critical need today that will only become more urgent in the years to come. By investing in sustainable technology now, we can create a more sustainable future for ourselves and generations to come.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Accenture

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2980 ?

Sustainable technology in 2980 (and, critically, now) is required everywhere. It’s not a localized need but a global imperative. Here’s a breakdown of why:

Globally Interconnected Systems: Our world is interconnected. Environmental problems in one regiCOURTESY on can have far-reaching consequences for others. Climate change, for example, affects the entire planet. Therefore, sustainable solutions must be implemented globally.
Resource Distribution: Resources are not evenly distributed across the globe. Sustainable technologies are needed to ensure equitable access to essential resources like water, energy, and food, regardless of location.
Economic Development: Sustainable development is crucial for economic growth and stability worldwide. Sustainable technologies can create new industries, jobs, and opportunities, while also minimizing environmental impact.
Urban and Rural Areas: Sustainable technologies are needed in both urban and rural areas. Cities need sustainable infrastructure, transportation, and waste management systems. Rural areas need sustainable agriculture, water management, and access to clean energy.
Developed and Developing Nations: Both developed and developing nations need sustainable technologies. Developed nations need to transition to more sustainable consumption patterns and help developing nations leapfrog to sustainable technologies.
Every Sector: Sustainable technologies are needed in every sector, including energy, transportation, agriculture, manufacturing, construction, and even information technology.

Think of it this way: Imagine a chain. If one link is weak (unsustainable), the entire chain is weakened. Similarly, if one region or sector is unsustainable, it can negatively impact the entire world.

Therefore, the “where” for sustainable technology is not a specific place, but everywhere – across all countries, regions, cities, and sectors. It requires a global effort with local implementations tailored to specific needs and contexts.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2980 ?

Sustainable technology in 2980 (and, crucially, now) is required through a multi-faceted approach, involving innovation, collaboration, and systemic change. It’s not just about inventing new gadgets; it’s about transforming how we live and interact with the planet. Here’s a breakdown of how it’s required:

1. Research and Development:

Fundamental Science: Continued investment in basic scientific research is essential for discovering new materials, processes, and energy sources.
Applied Research: Translating scientific discoveries into practical technologies is crucial. This requires collaboration between scientists, engineers, and industry.
Interdisciplinary Approach: Addressing complex sustainability challenges requires collaboration across disciplines, including science, engineering, social sciences, and policy.

2. Innovation and Entrepreneurship:

Creating New Solutions: Fostering a culture of innovation and entrepreneurship is essential for developing and deploying new sustainable technologies.
Supporting Startups: Incubators, accelerators, and venture capital can play a vital role in supporting sustainable technology startups.
Incentivizing Innovation: Policies that encourage innovation, such as tax breaks and grants, can help drive the development of sustainable technologies.

3. Policy and Regulation:

Setting Standards: Governments need to set clear standards and regulations to ensure that technologies are sustainable and environmentally sound.
Incentivizing Sustainable Practices: Policies such as carbon pricing, renewable energy mandates, and subsidies for sustainable technologies can help drive adoption.
International Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change requires international cooperation and agreements.

4. Education and Awareness:

Educating Future Generations: Integrating sustainability into education at all levels is crucial for creating a generation that understands and values sustainability.
Raising Public Awareness: Communicating the importance of sustainability and the benefits of sustainable technologies to the public is essential for driving adoption.

5. Investment and Infrastructure:

Investing in Sustainable Infrastructure: Building sustainable infrastructure, such as renewable energy grids, public transportation, and smart cities, is essential for supporting sustainable technologies.
Mobilizing Investment: Attracting investment in sustainable technologies from both public and private sectors is crucial.

6. Collaboration and Partnerships:

Public-Private Partnerships: Collaboration between governments, businesses, and research institutions can help accelerate the development and deployment of sustainable technologies.
International Collaboration: Sharing knowledge and resources across borders is essential for addressing global sustainability challenges.

7. Behavioral Change:

Promoting Sustainable Consumption: Encouraging individuals and businesses to adopt sustainable consumption patterns is essential for reducing environmental impact.
Empowering Individuals: Providing individuals with the information and tools they need to make sustainable choices can help drive change.

In short: Achieving a sustainable future requires a holistic approach that combines technological innovation with policy changes, education, investment, and behavioral shifts. It’s a complex challenge, but by working together, we can create a more sustainable world for ourselves and future generations. Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2980 ?

It’s impossible to provide a real case study of sustainable technology in 2980 because it’s the future! However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on extrapolating current trends and imagining potential advancements. This serves as a thought experiment to explore what might be possible and the kinds of challenges we might face.

Hypothetical Case Study: The Integrated Resource Network of Neo-London (2980)

Context: By 2980, coastal cities are increasingly vulnerable to rising sea levels. Neo-London, a megacity built on reclaimed land and protected by advanced sea walls, faces the dual challenge of providing for its population while minimizing its environmental footprint.

Solution: The city implements the Integrated Resource Network (IRN), a system that links all aspects of resource management in a closed-loop system.

Energy: Neo-London is powered primarily by fusion reactors, supplemented by space-based solar power. Smart grids, powered by AI, optimize energy distribution and usage, minimizing waste. Excess energy is used to produce synthetic fuels for specialized applications.
Water: Desalination plants powered by renewable energy provide fresh water. Wastewater is treated and recycled for irrigation and industrial use. Atmospheric water harvesters collect condensation for potable water.
Food: Vertical farms and hydroponic systems within the city produce a significant portion of the food supply, reducing reliance on external agriculture and transportation. Cultivated meat and other protein alternatives supplement traditional agriculture. Food waste is composted and used as fertilizer.
Materials: Advanced recycling facilities break down waste into its constituent materials, which are then used for 3D printing and manufacturing. Self-healing materials are used in construction and infrastructure, minimizing maintenance and extending lifespan. Biomanufacturing creates biodegradable plastics and other materials from renewable resources.
Transportation: Neo-London has a network of high-speed electric trains and autonomous vehicles. Personal air mobility is limited and strictly regulated, powered by sustainable aviation fuels. Walking and cycling are encouraged through green spaces and pedestrian-friendly infrastructure.

Challenges:

Maintaining System Stability: The IRN is a complex system, and ensuring its stability and resilience in the face of disruptions (e.g., natural disasters, technological failures) is a major challenge.
Cybersecurity: The interconnected nature of the IRN makes it vulnerable to cyberattacks. Protecting the system from malicious actors is crucial.
Social Equity: Ensuring that all residents have equal access to the benefits of the IRN and that no one is left behind in the transition to a sustainable city is essential.
Technological Obsolescence: Even in 2980, technology will continue to evolve. The IRN must be adaptable and able to incorporate new advancements to remain sustainable.

Outcomes:

Reduced Environmental Footprint: Neo-London has significantly reduced its carbon emissions and waste generation.
Improved Quality of Life: Residents have access to clean energy, water, and food, as well as efficient transportation and a healthy environment.
Economic Growth: The IRN has created new industries and jobs in sustainable technology and resource management.

Lessons Learned:

Systems Thinking: Addressing sustainability requires a holistic approach that considers all interconnected systems.
Technological Innovation: Continued investment in research and development is crucial for developing new sustainable technologies.
Social Inclusion: Ensuring that everyone benefits from sustainable technologies is essential for creating a just and equitable society.

This hypothetical case study illustrates the potential of sustainable technology in 2980. While the specifics are speculative, it highlights the importance of planning for a sustainable future and the kinds of challenges and opportunities we might encounter. The core principles – resource efficiency, renewable energy, and systemic thinking – are relevant even today.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2980 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 2980: Envisioning a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 2980. It acknowledges the speculative nature of predicting the future but aims to extrapolate current trends and imagine possible advancements in key areas like energy, resource management, environmental remediation, infrastructure, biotechnology, and artificial intelligence. The paper also discusses the critical considerations of ethics, global cooperation, and resilience necessary for achieving a truly sustainable future.

1. Introduction:

The pursuit of sustainability is a continuous journey, not a destination. While we cannot definitively know what technologies will exist in 2980, examining current trends and potential breakthroughs allows us to envision a future where humanity thrives in harmony with the planet. This paper explores potential advancements in sustainable technology across various sectors, acknowledging the inherent uncertainties while emphasizing the importance of proactive planning and responsible innovation.

2. Energy:

By 2980, reliance on fossil fuels is likely a distant memory. Potential energy sources include:

Fusion Power: Advanced and safe fusion reactors could provide clean, abundant energy.
Space-Based Solar Power: Large-scale solar arrays in orbit could beam clean energy to Earth.
Advanced Geothermal: Enhanced geothermal systems could tap into the Earth’s heat with greater efficiency.
Hyper-Efficient Energy Storage: Breakthroughs in battery technology or other storage solutions could enable seamless integration of renewable sources.

3. Resource Management:

A circular economy will be paramount in 2980:

Closed-Loop Recycling: Advanced material science and automated recycling systems could achieve near-total resource recovery.
3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing: On-demand manufacturing using recycled materials could minimize waste and resource extraction.
Biomanufacturing: Using biological processes to create materials could reduce reliance on fossil fuels and harmful chemicals.
Precision Agriculture: AI-powered agriculture could optimize resource use and maximize yields while minimizing environmental impact.

4. Environmental Remediation:

Restoring and protecting ecosystems will be crucial:

Carbon Capture and Sequestration: Advanced technologies could efficiently remove CO2 from the atmosphere.
Ocean Cleanup and Restoration: Robotic systems and bioremediation could help restore marine ecosystems.
Geoengineering (if necessary): Carefully considered geoengineering techniques might be used to mitigate climate change impacts, but with extreme caution and international oversight.

5. Smart and Sustainable Infrastructure:

Infrastructure will be intelligent and adaptive:

Self-Healing Materials: Materials that can automatically repair damage could minimize maintenance needs and extend lifespan.
Smart Grids: AI-powered grids could optimize energy distribution and prevent outages.
Sustainable Transportation: High-speed electric transportation networks, autonomous vehicles, and personal air mobility (powered by sustainable fuels) could minimize emissions and congestion.
Green Cities: Urban planning will prioritize green spaces, walkability, and resource efficiency.

6. Biotechnology and Biomimicry:

Learning from nature will be key:

Bioremediation: Using microorganisms to clean up pollution and restore ecosystems.
Biomimicry: Designing technologies inspired by nature’s solutions.
Synthetic Biology: Engineering biological systems for sustainable applications.

7. Artificial Intelligence and Automation:

AI will be a powerful tool for sustainability:

AI-Driven Optimization: AI could optimize energy use, resource allocation, and other processes across industries and cities.
Autonomous Systems: Robots and other autonomous systems could perform tasks in hazardous or remote environments.

8. Space and Resource Utilization:

Expanding beyond Earth:

Off-World Resource Extraction: Mining resources from asteroids or other celestial bodies could reduce pressure on Earth’s resources.
Space-Based Manufacturing: Manufacturing in space could take advantage of unique conditions like zero gravity.

9. Ethical Considerations:

Technological advancements must be guided by ethical principles:

Equity and Access: Ensuring that sustainable technologies benefit all of humanity, not just a privileged few.
Environmental Justice: Addressing the disproportionate impact of environmental problems on marginalized communities.
Responsible Innovation: Carefully considering the potential risks and unintended consequences of new technologies.

10. Global Cooperation and Governance:

Addressing global challenges requires collaboration:

International Agreements: Establishing frameworks for cooperation on climate change, resource management, and other global issues.
Shared Knowledge and Technology: Promoting the sharing of sustainable technologies and best practices.

11. Resilience and Adaptability:

Sustainable systems must be resilient:

Preparing for Disruptions: Designing systems that can withstand natural disasters, technological failures, and other disruptions.
Adaptive Management: Continuously monitoring and adapting systems to changing conditions.

12. Conclusion:

The sustainable technology of 2980 represents a vision of a future where human ingenuity and environmental stewardship go hand in hand. While the specific technologies may differ from what we imagine, the fundamental principles of resource efficiency, renewable energy, and global cooperation will remain essential. By embracing innovation, prioritizing ethical considerations, and working together, we can create a thriving and sustainable future for all.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2980 ?

While we can’t know for certain what industries will even exist in 2980, we can extrapolate current trends and imagine how highly advanced sustainable technologies might be integrated into industrial processes. Here are some hypothetical examples:

1. Manufacturing:

Closed-Loop Production: Factories of 2980 likely operate on closed-loop systems. Raw materials, potentially sourced from recycled materials or biomanufacturing, enter the production process, and finished goods emerge. Waste is virtually eliminated, as byproducts are either reused or transformed back into raw materials.
Additive Manufacturing (Advanced 3D Printing): 3D printing at an unprecedented scale and sophistication will be the norm. Factories can produce highly customized goods on demand, minimizing waste and allowing for localized production. Imagine entire buildings or complex machines being “printed” layer by layer.
AI-Optimized Processes: AI will manage every aspect of the manufacturing process, from design and production to quality control and logistics. AI can optimize energy use, minimize waste, and predict maintenance needs, leading to highly efficient and sustainable operations.
Biomanufacturing: Biological processes will be used to produce a wide range of materials, from biodegradable plastics and textiles to advanced composites and even pharmaceuticals. This reduces reliance on fossil fuels and petrochemicals.

2. Energy Production and Distribution:

Fusion Power Plants: Fusion reactors will likely be the primary source of industrial energy, providing clean and abundant power.
Space-Based Solar Energy: Industries located in remote areas or even in space (for off-world manufacturing) might rely on space-based solar power.
Smart Grids: AI-powered smart grids will manage energy distribution, ensuring that power is delivered where and when it’s needed most efficiently.
Energy Storage: Advanced energy storage systems will allow industries to store excess energy generated from renewable sources and use it during peak demand or when renewable sources are unavailable.

3. Resource Extraction and Processing:

Asteroid Mining: Industries might extract resources from asteroids and other celestial bodies, reducing the environmental impact of mining on Earth. Autonomous robotic systems will likely perform this work.
Advanced Recycling: Highly efficient recycling facilities will be able to recover nearly all valuable materials from waste streams.
In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU): For off-world industries, ISRU will be crucial. This involves using resources found at the destination (e.g., on Mars or the Moon) to produce needed materials and supplies.

4. Agriculture and Food Production:

Vertical Farms and Controlled Environment Agriculture: Urban centers and even industrial complexes might have integrated vertical farms and other forms of controlled environment agriculture to produce fresh food locally, reducing transportation costs and environmental impact.
Precision Agriculture: AI and robotics will optimize agricultural practices, minimizing water and fertilizer use while maximizing yields.
Cultivated Meat and Alternative Proteins: Industries will produce cultivated meat and other protein alternatives, reducing the environmental footprint of traditional animal agriculture.

5. Construction and Infrastructure:

Self-Healing Materials: Buildings and infrastructure will be constructed from self-healing materials, minimizing maintenance needs and extending lifespans.
Modular Construction: Modular construction techniques will allow for faster, more efficient, and more sustainable building processes.
3D-Printed Infrastructure: 3D printing will be used to create customized infrastructure components, even entire buildings, on demand.

6. Transportation and Logistics:

Autonomous Vehicles: Self-driving vehicles will be used extensively for transporting goods and materials, improving efficiency and reducing emissions.
Hyperloop and other High-Speed Transport: High-speed transportation systems like hyperloops will enable rapid and sustainable movement of goods and people.
Sustainable Aviation Fuels: The aviation industry will rely on sustainable aviation fuels produced from renewable resources or synthetic processes.

7. Information Technology:

Highly Efficient Data Centers: Data centers, which are essential for the digital economy, will be powered by renewable energy and optimized for energy efficiency.
Sustainable Computing: Research and development will focus on creating more sustainable computing technologies that use less energy and fewer resources.

It’s important to emphasize that these are just examples. The actual industrial applications of sustainable technology in 2980 will depend on the specific challenges and opportunities that arise in the future. However, the underlying principles of resource efficiency, renewable energy, and closed-loop systems will likely be central to all industrial activities.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2980 ?

It’s exciting to think about the research and development that might lead to the sustainable technologies of 2980! While we can’t predict the future with certainty, here are some potential areas of focus, building on current scientific trends:

1. Advanced Energy Technologies:

Fusion Energy: Continued research into fusion reactor design, plasma physics, and materials science will be crucial for making fusion a viable energy source.
Space-Based Solar: Developing efficient methods for transmitting energy from space to Earth, as well as building and maintaining large-scale solar arrays in orbit, will require significant R&D efforts.
Exotic Energy Sources: Exploring more unconventional energy sources, such as zero-point energy or tapping into the Earth’s magnetic field, could potentially lead to breakthroughs.
Quantum Energy: Investigating the potential of quantum phenomena for energy generation and storage is a long-shot but could have revolutionary implications.

2. Materials Science and Engineering:

Self-Healing Materials: Developing materials that can automatically repair damage, extending their lifespan and reducing maintenance needs, will require advancements in polymer science, nanotechnology, and materials characterization.
Smart Materials: Creating materials that can respond to their environment, such as changing color or shape in response to temperature or light, could have applications in various fields, from construction to fashion.
Biodegradable and Sustainable Materials: Researching new biopolymers and biocomposites derived from renewable resources will be essential for creating sustainable alternatives to traditional materials.
Advanced Composites: Developing lightweight, strong, and durable composite materials will be crucial for building sustainable infrastructure and transportation systems.

3. Biotechnology and Biomimicry:

Synthetic Biology: Engineering new biological systems for sustainable applications, such as producing biofuels, bioplastics, and pharmaceuticals, will require advancements in genetic engineering and molecular biology.
Biomanufacturing: Developing efficient and scalable methods for using biological processes to produce materials and products will require collaboration between biologists, engineers, and manufacturing experts.
Bioremediation: Researching new microorganisms and biological processes for cleaning up pollution and restoring ecosystems will be crucial for environmental remediation.
Brain-Computer Interfaces: Developing advanced BCIs could have applications in various fields, from healthcare to communication, and could potentially lead to more sustainable ways of interacting with technology.

4. Artificial Intelligence and Robotics:

AI for Materials Discovery: Using AI to accelerate the discovery of new materials with desired properties could significantly speed up the development of sustainable materials.
AI for Process Optimization: Developing AI algorithms that can optimize complex industrial processes, such as energy production and manufacturing, could lead to significant efficiency gains.
Autonomous Robotics: Researching and developing autonomous robots that can perform tasks in hazardous or remote environments, such as asteroid mining or ocean cleanup, will be essential for sustainable resource management.
Swarm Robotics: Developing swarms of small, coordinated robots could have applications in various fields, from agriculture to environmental monitoring.

5. Environmental Science and Geoengineering:

Climate Modeling: Improving our understanding of climate change through advanced climate modeling will be crucial for developing effective mitigation and adaptation strategies.
Carbon Capture and Sequestration: Researching new methods for capturing CO2 from the atmosphere and storing it safely will be essential for mitigating climate change.
Geoengineering: While geoengineering should be approached with caution, continued research into carefully designed techniques could be necessary to mitigate the impacts of climate change.

6. Space Exploration and Resource Utilization:

In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU): Developing technologies for extracting and utilizing resources found on other planets or asteroids will be crucial for future space exploration and off-world resource management.
Space-Based Manufacturing: Researching and developing methods for manufacturing in space, taking advantage of unique conditions like zero gravity, could lead to new industries and opportunities.

7. Social Sciences and Sustainability:

Sustainable Consumption: Studying human behavior and developing strategies for promoting sustainable consumption patterns will be essential for achieving a sustainable future.
Environmental Economics: Researching economic models that incorporate the value of natural resources and ecosystem services will be crucial for making informed decisions about sustainability.
Policy and Governance: Developing effective policies and governance frameworks for promoting sustainability will require collaboration between social scientists, policymakers, and the public.

Key Considerations for R&D:

Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Addressing complex sustainability challenges requires collaboration across disciplines, bringing together scientists, engineers, social scientists, and policymakers.
Long-Term Vision: Sustainable technology research and development requires a long-term perspective, as many of the challenges we face will take decades to solve.
Ethical Considerations: It’s crucial to consider the ethical implications of new technologies and ensure that they are used responsibly and for the benefit of all humanity.
Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity requires international cooperation and shared research efforts.

By investing in these areas of research and development, we can pave the way for a future where sustainable technology is not just a dream but a reality.Sources and related content

courtesy : NPTEL-NOC IITM

Reference

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.