Leave a Comment / Sustainable Technology of 2020, Sustainable technology of 4890 / By
79 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

Sustainable technology of 4890 ?

It seems like you might be asking about sustainable technologies related to a product or material with the code “4890”. Unfortunately, without more context, it’s difficult to give you a specific answer.

However, based on my knowledge, here are some possibilities and examples of sustainable technologies that might be relevant:

  • If “4890” refers to a specific product:
    • Rock Light RL-4890 Portable Inverter Solar Emergency Light: This product uses solar energy for charging, making it a sustainable option for emergency lighting and powering small devices. It also utilizes energy-efficient LED bulbs.
    • CRYLCOAT® 4890-0: This is a superdurable polyester resin used in powder coatings. It is part of the ECOWISE™ CHOICE product range, indicating its environmentally friendly properties. It is low/zero VOC and TMA – Non Intended.
  • General Sustainable Technologies:
    • Renewable Energy: Solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal energy sources are crucial for reducing our reliance on fossil fuels.
    • Energy Efficiency: Technologies that reduce energy consumption, such as LED lighting, smart grids, and improved insulation, are essential for sustainability.
    • Sustainable Transportation: Electric vehicles, hybrid cars, and improved public transportation systems can help reduce emissions from the transportation sector.
    • Waste Management: Recycling, composting, and waste-to-energy technologies are important for reducing waste and conserving resources.
    • Green Building Materials: Using sustainable materials like bamboo, recycled wood, and low-VOC paints can reduce the environmental impact of construction.

To give you a more accurate answer, please provide more information about what “4890” refers to. Is it a product code, a material specification, or something else?

In the meantime, I hope this general information about sustainable technologies is helpful!

What is Sustainable technology of 4890 ?

Unfortunately, “4890” by itself doesn’t tell me what it refers to. It could be a product code, a material specification, or something else entirely. To understand the “sustainable technology of 4890”, I need more context.

However, I can still provide some general information about sustainable technology and how it might apply to different things:

What is Sustainable Technology?

Sustainable technology aims to minimize negative environmental and social impacts while fostering economic and social development. It involves:

  • Using resources efficiently: Reducing waste, conserving energy, and utilizing renewable resources.
  • Preventing pollution: Minimizing emissions, reducing waste, and avoiding harmful substances.
  • Protecting ecosystems: Conserving biodiversity and avoiding damage to natural habitats.
  • Promoting social equity: Ensuring fair labor practices and access to resources.

How Sustainable Technology Applies to Different Things:

  • Products: Sustainable products are designed to minimize their environmental impact throughout their lifecycle, from material sourcing to manufacturing, use, and disposal. This can involve using recycled or renewable materials, reducing energy consumption during use, and designing for easy disassembly and recycling.
  • Processes: Sustainable processes aim to reduce waste, energy consumption, and pollution in manufacturing and other industries. This can involve using closed-loop systems, implementing energy-efficient technologies, and adopting cleaner production methods.
  • Energy: Sustainable energy involves using renewable sources like solar, wind, and geothermal power to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels. It also includes improving energy efficiency in buildings and transportation.
  • Agriculture: Sustainable agriculture aims to produce food in a way that minimizes environmental impact and supports healthy ecosystems. This can involve using organic farming methods, reducing water consumption, and promoting biodiversity.

To help me understand the “sustainable technology of 4890”, please provide more information about what “4890” refers to. Is it:

  • A product code? If so, what kind of product is it?
  • A material specification? If so, what kind of material is it?
  • Something else entirely?

The more information you can provide, the better I can understand your question and give you a relevant answer.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4890 ?

Unfortunately, I still need more information about what “4890” refers to in order to understand who would require its sustainable technology.

However, I can tell you that generally, the need for sustainable technology is widespread and applies to many different sectors and individuals. Here are some examples:

  • Businesses: Companies across various industries need sustainable technologies to reduce their environmental impact, comply with regulations, improve their reputation, and attract customers who are increasingly conscious of sustainability.
  • Governments: Governments at all levels need sustainable technologies to address climate change, reduce pollution, conserve resources, and promote sustainable development.
  • Individuals: Individuals can contribute to sustainability by adopting sustainable technologies in their daily lives, such as using energy-efficient appliances, choosing sustainable transportation options, and reducing waste.
  • Communities: Communities can work together to implement sustainable technologies at the local level, such as community solar projects, public transportation initiatives, and waste reduction programs.

Specific Examples:

  • If “4890” refers to a type of material, then manufacturers, consumers, and recyclers would all have a stake in its sustainable technology. Manufacturers would need to use sustainable production methods, consumers would need to make informed choices about using the material, and recyclers would need to develop ways to recycle it effectively.
  • If “4890” refers to a type of product, then the manufacturers, consumers, and retailers would all have a role to play. Manufacturers would need to design and produce the product sustainably, consumers would need to use it responsibly, and retailers would need to promote sustainable options.
  • If “4890” refers to a type of process, then the industries or organizations using that process would need to adopt sustainable technologies to reduce their environmental impact.

To help me understand who might require the sustainable technology of “4890”, please provide more context about what “4890” refers to. The more information you can give me, the better I can answer your question.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4890 ?

Just like the “who” question, the “when” of needing sustainable technology for “4890” depends entirely on what “4890” is. I can’t give you a specific date or time without that context.

However, I can talk about the general urgency and timeline around sustainable technology adoption:

  • Now: The need for sustainable technology is urgent. Climate change, resource depletion, and pollution are pressing issues that require immediate action. Delaying the adoption of sustainable technologies will only exacerbate these problems.
  • Ongoing: Sustainability is not a one-time fix. It requires continuous improvement and innovation. The need for sustainable technologies will continue indefinitely as we strive to create a more environmentally and socially responsible world.
  • Throughout the lifecycle: The need for sustainable technology exists throughout the entire lifecycle of a product, process, or material. This includes:
    • Design: Designing products and processes with sustainability in mind from the outset is crucial.
    • Manufacturing: Sustainable manufacturing practices are essential to minimize environmental impact.
    • Use: Products should be designed to be used efficiently and sustainably.
    • End-of-life: Sustainable disposal or recycling methods are necessary to prevent waste and pollution.
  • Driven by various factors: The “when” is also influenced by:
    • Regulations: Government regulations often drive the adoption of sustainable technologies.
    • Market demand: Consumer demand for sustainable products and services can also accelerate the adoption of these technologies.
    • Technological advancements: New and improved sustainable technologies are constantly being developed, making it easier and more cost-effective to adopt them.
    • Economic incentives: Incentives like tax breaks and subsidies can encourage businesses and individuals to invest in sustainable technologies.

Again, please tell me what “4890” refers to! Is it a product, a material, a process? Knowing this will allow me to give you a much more specific and helpful answer about when its sustainable technology is required.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4890 ?

I’m still missing the key piece of information: what “4890” is. Without knowing what it refers to (a product, material, process, etc.), I can only give general answers about where sustainable technology is needed.

Sustainable technology is needed everywhere. It’s not limited to a specific location. However, the specific sustainable technology required will vary depending on the context. Here are some general areas where sustainable technologies are crucial:

  • Globally: Sustainable technologies are needed worldwide to address global challenges like climate change, resource depletion, and biodiversity loss. International cooperation is essential to develop and implement these technologies.
  • Nationally: Governments need to invest in and promote sustainable technologies to meet national environmental goals and improve the quality of life for their citizens.
  • Locally: Communities can implement sustainable technologies at the local level to address specific environmental challenges and create more sustainable cities and towns.
  • In specific sectors: Sustainable technologies are needed in all sectors of the economy, including:
    • Energy: Renewable energy sources, energy-efficient buildings, smart grids.
    • Transportation: Electric vehicles, public transportation, sustainable aviation fuels.
    • Agriculture: Sustainable farming practices, water conservation, precision agriculture.
    • Manufacturing: Cleaner production methods, resource efficiency, circular economy models.
    • Construction: Green building materials, energy-efficient buildings, sustainable infrastructure.
    • Waste management: Recycling, composting, waste-to-energy technologies.
  • In homes and workplaces: Individuals can adopt sustainable technologies in their daily lives, such as using energy-efficient appliances, reducing waste, and choosing sustainable transportation options.

To get a more specific answer about where the sustainable technology of “4890” is required, please tell me what “4890” refers to. For example, if you tell me it’s a specific type of plastic, I can tell you where that type of plastic is used and therefore where sustainable alternatives or recycling methods are needed.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4890 ?

I understand your frustration, and I apologize that I can’t give you a more specific answer. I really need to know what “4890” is to tell you how its sustainable technology is required. It’s like asking “How is transportation required?” The answer depends on what is being transported (people, goods, etc.) and where it needs to go.

However, I can give you some general ways that sustainable technology is required, and these might give you some ideas about how to think about “4890” once you can tell me what it is:

  • Through research and development: Developing new and improved sustainable technologies requires ongoing research and development. This can involve scientists, engineers, and other experts working together to create innovative solutions.
  • Through policy and regulation: Governments can play a crucial role in promoting sustainable technology by enacting policies and regulations that encourage its adoption. This can include things like tax incentives, subsidies, and mandates.
  • Through market mechanisms: Consumer demand for sustainable products and services can drive the adoption of sustainable technology. Businesses can respond to this demand by offering more sustainable options.
  • Through education and awareness: Raising awareness about the importance of sustainable technology and educating people about how to use it is essential. This can involve schools, universities, community organizations, and the media.
  • Through investment and funding: Implementing sustainable technology often requires significant investment. This can come from governments, businesses, and individuals.
  • Through collaboration and partnerships: Addressing sustainability challenges requires collaboration and partnerships between different stakeholders, including governments, businesses, NGOs, and communities.
  • By considering the full lifecycle: Sustainable technology needs to be considered throughout the entire lifecycle of a product, process, or material, from design and manufacturing to use and end-of-life.
  • By focusing on specific areas: Sustainable technology can be applied to many different areas, including energy, transportation, agriculture, manufacturing, and waste management.

Think about “4890” in the context of these general methods. For example:

  • If “4890” is a material, how can research and development create a more sustainable version of it?
  • If “4890” is a product, how can market demand influence manufacturers to make it more sustainably?
  • If “4890” is a process, what policies or regulations could encourage businesses to adopt a more sustainable version of it?

Please, please tell me what “4890” is! I’m eager to help, but I’m stuck without that crucial piece of information.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4890 ?

A case study about sustainable technology related to something designated “4890” could exist, but “4890” itself isn’t a case study. A case study is a detailed examination of a specific real-world example. It explores how something was implemented, the challenges faced, the solutions found, and the results achieved.

So, it’s possible there’s a case study about the sustainable technology related to “4890,” but “4890” itself is what the case study might be about. Think of it this way: “Sustainable technology of 4890” is the topic, and a case study would be a detailed story about a specific instance of that topic being put into practice.

Example:

Let’s imagine “4890” refers to a specific type of plastic used in car manufacturing.

  • “4890”: This is the type of plastic.
  • “Sustainable technology of 4890”: This could refer to things like using recycled 4890, creating a biodegradable version of 4890, or developing a new manufacturing process that reduces the environmental impact of producing 4890.
  • Case Study: A case study could then be written about a specific car manufacturer that successfully implemented one of these sustainable technologies related to 4890. The case study would detail how the manufacturer did it, what challenges they faced, and what the positive outcomes were (e.g., reduced carbon footprint, cost savings, improved brand image).

To find a case study about the sustainable technology of 4890, you would need to know what 4890 is. Then you could search for case studies related to that specific product, material, or process and look for those that focus on sustainability.

I’m still hoping you can tell me what “4890” is! Knowing that is the key to finding relevant information.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4890 ?

You’re on the right track! A white paper is a great way to explore the topic of sustainable technology related to “4890” in detail. However, just like with a case study, a white paper needs a subject. It’s a document that argues a specific position or provides in-depth information on a particular issue.

Here’s how a white paper on the sustainable technology of 4890 could be structured:

  • Introduction: Briefly introduce “4890” (whatever it is) and its relevance. Explain the importance of sustainability in this context and state the purpose of the white paper.
  • Background: Provide more detailed information about “4890.” What are its current uses? What are the environmental challenges associated with it?
  • Sustainable Technology Options: This is the core of the white paper. Explore various sustainable technologies that could be applied to “4890.” This could include:
    • Alternative materials: Are there more sustainable substitutes for “4890”?
    • Process improvements: Can the way “4890” is made be made more environmentally friendly?
    • Recycling and reuse: How can “4890” be recycled or reused to reduce waste?
    • Lifecycle analysis: What are the environmental impacts of “4890” throughout its entire lifecycle, and how can these be minimized?
  • Case Studies (if available): Include any relevant case studies that demonstrate the successful implementation of sustainable technologies related to “4890.”
  • Challenges and Opportunities: Discuss the challenges associated with adopting sustainable technologies for “4890,” as well as the potential benefits and opportunities.
  • Recommendations: Offer specific recommendations for how to promote and implement sustainable technology related to “4890.” This could be directed at manufacturers, consumers, policymakers, or other stakeholders.
  • Conclusion: Summarize the key points of the white paper and reiterate the importance of sustainable technology for “4890.”

To write a white paper on this topic, you absolutely must know what “4890” is. Once you have that information, you can start researching and gathering information to support your arguments and recommendations.

I’m ready to help you brainstorm and research once you tell me what “4890” is! We can work together to develop a compelling and informative white paper.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4890 ?

I understand you’re trying to figure out how sustainable technology could be applied to something called “4890” in an industrial setting. Unfortunately, I still can’t give you specific examples without knowing what “4890” is. It could be a material, a chemical, a process, a machine, or something else entirely!

However, I can give you some general examples of how sustainable technology is applied in various industries, and this might help you think about how it could apply to “4890” once you can tell me what it is:

General Examples of Sustainable Technology in Industries:

  • Manufacturing:
    • Resource efficiency: Reducing waste, using recycled materials, and designing products for disassembly and reuse.
    • Energy efficiency: Implementing energy-efficient equipment and processes, using renewable energy sources.
    • Pollution prevention: Reducing emissions, using cleaner production methods, and minimizing waste generation.
    • Sustainable supply chains: Sourcing materials from sustainable suppliers, reducing transportation distances.
  • Energy:
    • Renewable energy sources: Solar, wind, hydro, geothermal power.
    • Energy storage: Batteries, pumped hydro storage.
    • Smart grids: Optimizing energy distribution and consumption.
  • Transportation:
    • Electric vehicles: Reducing emissions from transportation.
    • Sustainable fuels: Biofuels, hydrogen fuel.
    • Improved public transportation: Reducing reliance on private vehicles.
  • Agriculture:
    • Precision agriculture: Using technology to optimize resource use (water, fertilizer).
    • Organic farming: Reducing the use of synthetic pesticides and fertilizers.
    • Vertical farming: Growing crops in controlled indoor environments to reduce land and water use.
  • Construction:
    • Green building materials: Using sustainable materials like bamboo, recycled wood, and low-VOC paints.
    • Energy-efficient buildings: Designing buildings to minimize energy consumption.
    • Sustainable infrastructure: Developing transportation and energy systems that are environmentally friendly.

To figure out the industrial applications of sustainable technology for “4890,” think about:

  • What industry is “4890” used in? (e.g., manufacturing, construction, energy, etc.)
  • What is the purpose of “4890”? (e.g., is it a material, a component, a tool?)
  • What are the environmental challenges associated with “4890”? (e.g., is it energy-intensive to produce, does it generate waste, does it contain harmful substances?)

Once you have this information, you can start to explore specific sustainable technology solutions that could be relevant.

Please, tell me what “4890” is! I’m ready to help you brainstorm and research once I have that crucial piece of information.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4890 ?

I understand you’re interested in the research and development (R&D) aspect of sustainable technology related to “4890.” However, I still need to know what “4890” is to give you any meaningful information. It’s impossible to discuss R&D for an unknown. It’s like saying, “What’s the R&D for X?” You have to know what X is!

However, I can describe the general process of R&D for sustainable technologies, and this might help you think about how it could apply to “4890” once you can tell me what it is:

General R&D Process for Sustainable Technologies:

  1. Problem Definition: Clearly identify the environmental challenge that needs to be addressed. This could be related to “4890”‘s production, use, or disposal. Examples: high energy consumption, pollution, waste generation, use of scarce resources.
  2. Literature Review: Researchers review existing scientific literature, patents, and other information to understand the current state of knowledge and identify potential solutions.
  3. Ideation and Brainstorming: Researchers generate new ideas and concepts for sustainable technologies that could address the identified problem.
  4. Feasibility Study: Evaluate the technical and economic feasibility of the proposed solutions. This may involve computer modeling, laboratory experiments, and cost analysis.
  5. Prototype Development: Develop prototypes of the most promising solutions.
  6. Testing and Evaluation: Test the prototypes in the lab and/or in real-world settings to evaluate their performance, environmental impact, and cost-effectiveness.
  7. Optimization and Refinement: Based on the test results, optimize and refine the prototypes to improve their performance and address any shortcomings.
  8. Scaling Up: Develop methods for scaling up the production of the sustainable technology from the prototype stage to commercial production.
  9. Life Cycle Assessment: Conduct a comprehensive life cycle assessment to evaluate the environmental impacts of the sustainable technology throughout its entire life cycle, from material extraction to end-of-life management.
  10. Collaboration and Partnerships: Collaborate with other researchers, industry partners, and government agencies to accelerate the development and deployment of sustainable technologies.

If you tell me what “4890” is, I can help you think about:

  • What specific environmental challenges are associated with it.
  • What kinds of sustainable technologies could potentially address those challenges.
  • What areas of R&D would be most relevant.

Please, give me the missing piece of the puzzle! What is “4890”?

courtesy : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
  53. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
  77. ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
  96. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
  107. ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

Recommended HashTags

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »