Leave a Comment / Blog / By

Sustainable technology of 4880 ?

It seems like you might be asking about the sustainable technology of the Epson Stylus Pro 4880. While the printer itself is no longer in production, we can discuss its sustainability aspects and how they relate to broader trends in sustainable technology.

Sustainability Features of the Epson 4880:

  • Energy Efficiency: The printer was designed with energy-saving features to reduce power consumption during operation and when idle.
  • Long-lasting Design: Epson printers are generally known for their durability, which contributes to sustainability by reducing the need for frequent replacements.
  • Ink Cartridge Recycling: Epson offers programs for recycling ink cartridges, reducing waste and promoting resource recovery.

Connecting to Broader Trends in Sustainable Technology:

The sustainability features of the Epson 4880, while specific to its time, reflect broader trends in sustainable technology that continue to evolve:

  • Energy Efficiency: This remains a critical focus, with ongoing advancements in printer technology to further reduce energy consumption.
  • Circular Economy: The emphasis on recycling and resource recovery has grown, with more manufacturers adopting circular economy principles to minimize waste and maximize product lifespan.
  • Sustainable Materials: There’s increasing focus on using recycled and renewable materials in printer manufacturing, as well as reducing the environmental impact of ink formulations.

Looking Ahead:

Sustainable technology in the printing industry continues to advance, with innovations like:

  • More efficient printing technologies: such as those that use less energy and produce less waste.
  • Eco-friendly inks: made from renewable resources or with reduced environmental impact.
  • Printer designs that prioritize recyclability and reuse.

While the Epson 4880 may be an older model, its sustainability features were a step in the right direction. The ongoing development of sustainable technology in the printing industry promises even more environmentally friendly solutions in the future.

What is Sustainable technology of 4880 ?

While the Epson Stylus Pro 4880 itself is no longer in production, it’s helpful to consider its sustainability features within the context of its time and how those features relate to broader trends in sustainable technology.

Here’s a breakdown:

Sustainability Features of the Epson 4880:

  • Energy Efficiency: The printer was designed with energy-saving features to reduce power consumption during operation and when idle. This was important even then, as energy consumption is a key factor in environmental impact.
  • Long-lasting Design: Epson printers are generally known for their durability. A longer lifespan for a product contributes to sustainability by reducing the need for frequent replacements, which saves resources and reduces waste.
  • Ink Cartridge Recycling: Epson offered programs for recycling ink cartridges. This helps to reduce waste and promotes resource recovery, preventing materials from ending up in landfills.

Connecting to Broader Trends in Sustainable Technology:

The sustainability features of the Epson 4880, while specific to its time, reflect broader trends in sustainable technology that continue to evolve:

  • Energy Efficiency: This remains a critical focus across industries, with ongoing advancements in technology to further reduce energy consumption.
  • Circular Economy: The emphasis on recycling and resource recovery has grown significantly. More manufacturers are adopting circular economy principles to minimize waste and maximize product lifespan through strategies like reuse, repair, and recycling.
  • Sustainable Materials: There’s an increasing focus on using recycled and renewable materials in manufacturing, as well as reducing the environmental impact of consumables like ink.

Looking Ahead:

Sustainable technology in the printing industry continues to advance, with innovations like:

  • More efficient printing technologies: such as those that use less energy and produce less waste.
  • Eco-friendly inks: made from renewable resources or with reduced environmental impact.
  • Printer designs that prioritize recyclability and reuse.

While the Epson 4880 may be an older model, its sustainability features were a step in the right direction. The ongoing development of sustainable technology in the printing industry promises even more environmentally friendly solutions in the future.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4880 ?

It’s more accurate to say that sustainable technology, in general, is something that everyone benefits from and should be concerned with. When we talk about the “required” sustainable technology of a specific product like the Epson 4880, we’re really talking about who has a stake in its sustainability and who is responsible for implementing and improving it.

Here’s a breakdown:

  • Consumers: Individuals who use the Epson 4880 (or any product) benefit from sustainable technology because it can lead to:
    • Reduced environmental impact: Less pollution, less waste, and conservation of resources.
    • Cost savings: Energy efficiency can lower operating costs.
    • Healthier environment: Reduced exposure to harmful substances.
  • Manufacturers: Companies like Epson are responsible for designing and producing products with sustainability in mind. This includes:
    • Using recycled and renewable materials.
    • Designing for energy efficiency and durability.
    • Implementing recycling programs for their products.
  • Society as a whole: We all have a stake in sustainable technology because it contributes to:
    • A healthier planet for current and future generations.
    • A more sustainable economy.
    • Reduced reliance on finite resources.

In the case of the Epson 4880, while the printer itself is no longer in production, the principles of its sustainable design remain relevant. Consumers who owned the printer benefited from its energy efficiency and durability. Epson, as the manufacturer, played a role in incorporating those sustainable features. And ultimately, society benefits from the collective effort to create and use more sustainable technology.

It’s important to remember that sustainable technology is not just the responsibility of manufacturers. Consumers also have a role to play by making informed choices, using products responsibly, and participating in recycling programs.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4880 ?

It’s tricky to pinpoint an exact “when” for the need for sustainable technology in the Epson 4880. Here’s why:

  • Sustainability is an ongoing concern: The need for sustainable practices existed even before the 4880 was released in 2007. Resource conservation, energy efficiency, and waste reduction have been important for a long time.
  • Technology evolves: As technology advances, our understanding of environmental impact and our ability to create sustainable solutions also improve. So, the “when” is constantly shifting.

However, we can talk about the context surrounding the need for sustainable technology in the 4880:

  • Growing environmental awareness: In the early 2000s, there was increasing public awareness of environmental issues like climate change and resource depletion. This led to a demand for more sustainable products and practices across industries, including printing.
  • Technological advancements: Around that time, advancements in materials science, energy efficiency, and manufacturing processes made it more feasible for companies to incorporate sustainable features into their products.

So, while there’s no single “when” for the need for sustainable technology in the Epson 4880, it’s safe to say that the need existed during its development and release, driven by growing environmental awareness and technological advancements.

It’s also important to remember that the need for sustainable technology is not limited to a specific time period. It’s an ongoing and evolving need that continues to be crucial as we strive for a more environmentally responsible future.

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4880 ?

This is a great question that gets at the heart of why sustainable technology is important! Here’s how we can think about “where” sustainable technology is required in the context of the Epson 4880:

  • In the design and manufacturing process: Sustainable technology is needed in the very creation of the printer. This includes:
    • Sourcing materials responsibly: Using recycled plastics, sustainably harvested paper pulp, and minimizing the use of harmful substances.
    • Energy-efficient manufacturing: Reducing the energy used to produce the printer and its components.
    • Designing for durability and longevity: Making a product that lasts, reducing the need for replacements.
  • In the use of the product: Sustainable technology is also needed while the printer is being used:
    • Energy-saving features: Like those in the 4880, that reduce power consumption during operation and idle modes.
    • Efficient ink usage: Minimizing ink waste and developing more eco-friendly ink formulations.
    • Paper usage: Encouraging double-sided printing and using recycled paper.
  • At the end of the product’s life: Sustainable technology is needed to manage the printer’s disposal:
    • Recycling programs: Like Epson’s ink cartridge recycling, to recover materials and prevent waste.
    • Designing for disassembly: Making it easier to take the printer apart for recycling or reuse of components.

Essentially, sustainable technology is required throughout the entire lifecycle of the Epson 4880 (or any product) – from its initial design to its eventual disposal.

It’s not just about one specific “where,” but rather a holistic approach that considers the environmental impact at every stage. This is why manufacturers, consumers, and even policymakers all have a role to play in promoting and implementing sustainable technology.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4880 ?

That’s a great question! It’s important to understand how sustainable technology is implemented to make it effective. Here’s how sustainable technology is required in the context of the Epson 4880:

1. Through Design and Engineering:

  • Material Selection: Choosing materials with lower environmental impact, such as recycled plastics, bioplastics, or sustainably sourced paper pulp. This reduces the reliance on virgin resources and minimizes waste.
  • Energy Efficiency: Designing the printer to consume less energy during operation and in standby mode. This can be achieved through efficient components, power management systems, and innovative printing technologies.
  • Durability and Longevity: Engineering the printer for a longer lifespan. This reduces the need for frequent replacements, saving resources and reducing waste.
  • Design for Disassembly: Making it easier to take the printer apart for recycling or reuse of components at the end of its life. This promotes a circular economy and minimizes landfill waste.

2. Through Manufacturing Processes:

  • Minimizing Waste: Reducing waste during the manufacturing process through efficient production techniques and careful material management.
  • Energy-Efficient Production: Using renewable energy sources and implementing energy-saving measures in manufacturing facilities.
  • Sustainable Packaging: Using recycled and recyclable packaging materials to reduce environmental impact.

3. Through Product Use:

  • Energy-Saving Features: Incorporating features like sleep modes, automatic shut-off, and efficient printing technologies to reduce energy consumption during use.
  • Ink Efficiency: Developing ink cartridges and printing systems that minimize ink waste and maximize the number of prints per cartridge.
  • Paper Usage: Encouraging double-sided printing and promoting the use of recycled paper.

4. Through End-of-Life Management:

  • Recycling Programs: Establishing programs for recycling ink cartridges and printer components to recover valuable materials and prevent waste.
  • Product Take-Back Programs: Offering programs for consumers to return their old printers for recycling or refurbishment.

Essentially, sustainable technology is required through a holistic approach that considers the environmental impact at every stage of the product’s life cycle. This requires collaboration between designers, engineers, manufacturers, consumers, and policymakers to create and implement sustainable solutions.

In the case of the Epson 4880, while some of these aspects were addressed, ongoing advancements in sustainable technology mean that there are always opportunities for improvement.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4880 ?

Unfortunately, there isn’t a widely published, formal case study specifically focusing on the sustainable technology of the Epson 4880. However, we can construct a sort of “case study” by examining its features and how they relate to broader sustainability principles:

Case Study: Sustainable Technology Aspects of the Epson 4880

Introduction:

The Epson Stylus Pro 4880, released in 2007, was a professional-grade inkjet printer. While not explicitly marketed as a “green” product, it incorporated several features that align with sustainable technology principles, particularly for its time.

Key Features and Sustainability Aspects:

  • Energy Efficiency: The 4880 was designed with energy-saving features, including a sleep mode and reduced power consumption during operation. This aligns with the core principle of minimizing energy use, which is crucial for reducing environmental impact.
  • Durability: Epson printers are generally known for their robust design. The 4880 was built to last, which contributes to sustainability by reducing the need for frequent replacements. A longer product lifespan means less resource consumption and less waste.
  • Ink Cartridge Recycling: Epson offered programs for recycling ink cartridges. This is a significant sustainability feature as it diverts waste from landfills and promotes resource recovery. Recycling helps reduce the environmental impact associated with manufacturing new cartridges.

Analysis:

The 4880’s sustainability features, while perhaps not groundbreaking, were indicative of a growing awareness within the industry of the importance of environmentally responsible practices. The focus on energy efficiency, durability, and recycling reflects a move towards minimizing the environmental footprint of printing technology.

Limitations:

It’s important to acknowledge that the 4880’s sustainability efforts were limited compared to more recent advancements. For example:

  • Material Composition: While durable, the printer likely still relied on conventional plastics and materials, which may have had a significant environmental impact.
  • Manufacturing Processes: Information on the sustainability of the manufacturing processes for the 4880 is not readily available.
  • End-of-Life Design: While recycling was encouraged, the printer’s design may not have explicitly prioritized ease of disassembly and material recovery.

Conclusion:

The Epson 4880, while not a perfect example of sustainable technology, demonstrates that even in the mid-2000s, manufacturers were beginning to incorporate environmentally conscious features into their products. Its energy efficiency, durability, and ink cartridge recycling program were steps in the right direction. However, this “case study” also highlights the ongoing need for advancements in sustainable technology, including the use of more sustainable materials, more environmentally friendly manufacturing processes, and designs that prioritize end-of-life management.

This “case study” approach helps us understand how the Epson 4880, within the context of its time, contributed to the broader movement towards more sustainable technology in the printing industry

COURTESY : TURILYTIX

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4880 ?

I can’t produce a formal, published “white paper” on the Epson 4880’s sustainability because I don’t have access to the original design documents, manufacturing details, or specific lifecycle assessments that would be required for such a document. A true white paper would typically be authored by Epson itself, or an independent research firm.

However, I can give you a structured outline and the kind of information that would be included in such a white paper, which you could then use as a starting point for your own research or analysis:

Title: A Retrospective Analysis of Sustainability Aspects in the Epson Stylus Pro 4880

Abstract: (A brief summary of the paper’s contents and key findings.)

1. Introduction:

  • Briefly introduce the Epson Stylus Pro 4880 and its target market.
  • State the purpose of the white paper: to examine the printer’s sustainability features within the context of its time and broader trends in sustainable technology.
  • Briefly define “sustainable technology” as it applies to printing.

2. Product Overview:

  • Describe the key features and specifications of the Epson 4880.
  • Highlight any features that were marketed as environmentally friendly or energy-saving.

3. Sustainability Features and Analysis:

  • Energy Efficiency:
    • Detail the printer’s energy-saving modes (sleep mode, etc.) and their impact on power consumption.
    • Compare the 4880’s energy consumption to similar printers of its time, if data is available.
    • Discuss the importance of energy efficiency in reducing environmental impact.
  • Durability and Longevity:
    • Discuss the printer’s design and build quality, and how it contributed to durability.
    • Explain the link between product lifespan and sustainability (fewer replacements = less resource use).
  • Ink Cartridge Recycling Program:
    • Describe Epson’s ink cartridge recycling program and its effectiveness.
    • Quantify the impact of recycling in terms of waste reduction and resource recovery, if data is available.
  • Materials and Manufacturing: (This section would likely have the least detail, as information is hard to come by after a product is discontinued.)
    • Discuss the types of materials used in the printer’s construction.
    • If any information is available on sustainable manufacturing practices used by Epson at the time, include it here.
  • End-of-Life Considerations:
    • Discuss the recyclability of the printer’s components.
    • Analyze whether the printer’s design facilitated disassembly and material recovery.

4. Comparative Analysis:

  • Compare the Epson 4880’s sustainability features to other printers in its class from the same period. (This would require research into competitor products.)
  • Discuss how the 4880’s sustainability features aligned with industry trends at the time.

5. Limitations:

  • Acknowledge any limitations in the available data or analysis.
  • Discuss areas where the 4880’s sustainability performance could have been improved.

6. Conclusion:

  • Summarize the key findings of the white paper.
  • Reiterate the importance of sustainable technology in the printing industry.
  • Briefly discuss the evolution of sustainable printing technology since the release of the 4880.

7. References: (List any sources used.)

This outline should give you a good starting point for researching and structuring your own analysis of the Epson 4880’s sustainability aspects. Remember that a true white paper requires in-depth research and often involves primary data from the manufacturer.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4880 ?

While the Epson 4880 itself is no longer in production, its sustainability features and the broader context of its design can offer insights into the industrial applications of sustainable technology in the printing industry. Here are some key areas:

1. Design for Durability and Longevity:

  • Industrial Application: In manufacturing, designing products for durability and longevity is a core principle of sustainable technology. This reduces the need for frequent replacements, which saves resources and minimizes waste.
  • 4880 Example: The 4880, known for its robust design, exemplifies this. Its longer lifespan, compared to less durable printers, meant less resource consumption and waste associated with manufacturing replacements.

2. Energy Efficiency:

  • Industrial Application: Energy efficiency is crucial across industries. In manufacturing, it translates to lower energy consumption in production processes, reducing operational costs and environmental impact.
  • 4880 Example: The 4880’s energy-saving features, like sleep mode, reflect this. While on a smaller scale, they mirror the industrial drive for energy-efficient equipment and processes.

3. Waste Reduction and Resource Recovery:

  • Industrial Application: Minimizing waste and maximizing resource recovery are fundamental to sustainable manufacturing. This includes recycling programs, closed-loop systems, and designing products for disassembly and material reuse.
  • 4880 Example: Epson’s ink cartridge recycling program, while specific to the 4880, aligns with this. It demonstrates the principle of taking responsibility for product end-of-life and recovering valuable materials.

4. Sustainable Materials:

  • Industrial Application: The shift towards sustainable materials is a significant industrial trend. This involves using recycled and renewable resources, reducing reliance on virgin materials, and minimizing the use of harmful substances.
  • 4880 Context: While the 4880’s material composition might not have been cutting-edge in terms of sustainability, it highlights the ongoing need for research and development into more eco-friendly materials for manufacturing.

5. Life Cycle Assessment:

  • Industrial Application: A comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) evaluates the environmental impact of a product from its raw material extraction to its end-of-life management. This informs design decisions and helps identify areas for improvement.
  • 4880 Connection: While a formal LCA for the 4880 might not be available, considering its sustainability features within the context of its entire life cycle (design, manufacturing, use, disposal) is a basic form of LCA thinking.

Overall:

The Epson 4880, while a specific product, reflects broader trends in sustainable technology that are highly relevant to industrial applications. Its focus on durability, energy efficiency, and recycling aligns with key principles of sustainable manufacturing. While advancements in sustainable technology have come a long way since the 4880’s release, its features and the context of its design provide valuable insights into the ongoing evolution of sustainable practices in the printing industry and beyond.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4880 ?

While the Epson 4880 itself is no longer the focus of active research and development, its features and the context of its design can highlight areas where R&D in sustainable printing technology has advanced and continues to be important. Here are some key areas:

1. Sustainable Materials:

  • Past: The 4880, like most printers of its time, likely relied on conventional plastics and materials.
  • Current R&D: Research is focused on developing bioplastics, recycled plastics, and other more sustainable alternatives for printer components. This includes exploring materials with lower environmental impact and developing closed-loop recycling systems to recover and reuse materials from end-of-life printers.

2. Energy Efficiency:

  • Past: The 4880 had energy-saving features like sleep mode.
  • Current R&D: Ongoing research focuses on developing even more energy-efficient printing technologies, such as those that use less heat or require less power to operate. This includes optimizing print heads, improving power management systems, and exploring new printing methods.

3. Ink Technology:

  • Past: The 4880 used traditional ink cartridges, with recycling programs in place.
  • Current R&D: Research is focused on developing more eco-friendly ink formulations, including those made from renewable resources or with reduced VOCs (volatile organic compounds). There’s also a push for more efficient ink delivery systems to minimize waste and maximize the number of prints per cartridge.

4. Printing Processes:

  • Past: The 4880 used inkjet technology, which has its own set of environmental considerations.
  • Current R&D: Research is exploring alternative printing technologies with potentially lower environmental impacts, such as those that use less water or produce less waste. This includes advancements in 3D printing, which can offer more precise material deposition and reduce waste in certain applications.

5. Life Cycle Assessment and Design for Disassembly:

  • Past: While recycling programs existed for the 4880, design for disassembly might not have been a primary focus.
  • Current R&D: There’s a growing emphasis on life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental impact of printers from cradle to grave. This includes research into designing printers for easier disassembly and material recovery, promoting a circular economy model where resources are kept in use for as long as possible.

6. Software and User Behavior:

  • Past: The 4880’s software likely had basic features to encourage paper saving (like double-sided printing).
  • Current R&D: Research is exploring how software and user interfaces can be designed to promote more sustainable printing practices. This includes features that track energy and paper usage, provide feedback to users, and encourage eco-friendly printing choices.

Overall:

While the Epson 4880 is no longer the subject of R&D, it serves as a reminder of how far sustainable printing technology has come. The ongoing research and development in these areas promise even more environmentally friendly printing solutions in the future, with a focus on minimizing resource consumption, reducing waste, and promoting a circular economy.

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
  53. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
  77. ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
  96. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
  107. ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »