
Sustainable technology of 4830 ?
Several companies are working on sustainable technologies in 2025. One example is Adani Green, which is using robotics to clean its solar panels and save water. Other companies are developing new ways to generate and store renewable energy, as well as new methods for reducing pollution and waste.
What is Sustainable technology of 4830 ?
The year 4830 is far in the future, so it is impossible to say for sure what sustainable technologies will exist then. However, it is likely that many of the technologies that are being developed in 2025 will continue to be improved and refined. Additionally, it is possible that new technologies will be developed that we cannot even imagine today.
Some possible examples of sustainable technologies that might exist in 4830 include:
- Advanced renewable energy sources: Solar, wind, and other renewable energy sources could be even more efficient and cost-effective than they are today. It is also possible that new renewable energy sources will be discovered.
- Highly efficient energy storage: Energy storage technologies could be developed that are able to store large amounts of energy for long periods of time. This would make it possible to use renewable energy sources to power entire cities and even countries.
- Closed-loop manufacturing: In a closed-loop manufacturing system, all of the materials used to make a product are recycled and reused. This would eliminate the need for landfills and reduce the consumption of natural resources.
- Vertical farming: Vertical farms are buildings that are used to grow crops indoors. This technology could be used to produce food in urban areas and reduce the need for agricultural land.
- Artificial intelligence: Artificial intelligence could be used to optimize energy use, manage resources, and develop new sustainable technologies.
It is important to remember that these are just a few possibilities. The sustainable technologies of 4830 could be very different from anything we can imagine today. However, it is clear that sustainable technology will play a vital role in ensuring a healthy planet for future generations.
Who is required Sustainable technology of 4830 ?
It’s impossible to say for sure who will “require” sustainable technology in 4830. However, it’s safe to say that sustainable technology will be essential for the survival and well-being of any civilization that exists at that time.
Here’s why:
- Resource Depletion: By 4830, many of Earth’s natural resources may be depleted or severely limited. Sustainable technologies will be necessary to ensure that future generations have access to the resources they need to survive.
- Climate Change: The effects of climate change are likely to continue to worsen in the coming centuries. Sustainable technologies will be crucial for mitigating the impacts of climate change and adapting to a changing environment.
- Population Growth: The global population is expected to continue to grow in the coming centuries. Sustainable technologies will be needed to provide food, water, and energy for a growing population.
- Environmental Degradation: Pollution and other forms of environmental degradation are likely to become even more serious problems in the future. Sustainable technologies will be needed to clean up the environment and prevent further damage.
In short, sustainable technology will be essential for creating a livable future for humanity. It’s not a matter of who “requires” it, but rather a necessity for any society that wants to survive and thrive in the long term.
It’s also possible that by 4830, humanity may have expanded beyond Earth and established colonies on other planets. In that case, sustainable technologies would be even more critical for ensuring the survival and self-sufficiency of these colonies.
Ultimately, the development and use of sustainable technology is a responsibility that falls on all of us, not just those who will live in 4830. By making sustainable choices today, we can help to ensure that future generations have a healthy and prosperous world to inherit.
When is required Sustainable technology of 4830 ?
While it’s impossible to pinpoint an exact date for when sustainable technology will be “required” in 4830, we can certainly discuss the trajectory and the increasing urgency.
The Need is Already Here
The truth is, the need for sustainable technology is not something that will suddenly appear in 4830. It’s a need that is already critical in 2025 and will only become more urgent in the coming centuries.
Here’s a breakdown of why:
- Present-day Challenges: We are already facing the consequences of unsustainable practices: climate change, resource depletion, pollution, and biodiversity loss. These issues are not going to magically disappear; they will likely intensify if we don’t act.
- Long-term Impacts: The decisions we make today have long-lasting effects. The environmental damage we cause now will continue to impact the planet for centuries to come. This means that even if we achieve some level of sustainability in the near future, we still need to constantly innovate and improve to maintain it.
- Future Generations: Those living in 4830 will inherit the consequences of our actions. It’s our responsibility to ensure that they have the resources and a healthy environment to thrive.
A Gradual Shift
The transition to a fully sustainable world is not going to happen overnight. It’s a gradual process that requires continuous effort and innovation. Here’s how it might unfold:
- Increased Awareness: As people become more aware of the environmental challenges we face, they will demand more sustainable solutions. This will drive innovation and create a market for sustainable technologies.
- Technological Advancements: We can expect significant advancements in sustainable technologies in the coming centuries. These advancements will make sustainable solutions more efficient, cost-effective, and accessible.
- Policy Changes: Governments will play a crucial role in promoting sustainable practices through policies and regulations. This could include incentives for sustainable businesses, taxes on polluting activities, and international agreements to address global environmental issues.
- Cultural Shift: Ultimately, a sustainable future will require a cultural shift in how we think about our relationship with the planet. We need to move away from a mindset of consumption and waste towards a more circular and regenerative approach.
The Importance of Now
While 4830 might seem far away, the actions we take today will determine what the world looks like then. It’s crucial that we prioritize sustainable technology now, not just for our own sake, but for the sake of future generations.
In conclusion, sustainable technology is not something that will be “required” at a specific point in the future. It’s an ongoing necessity that we must embrace now and continue to develop and improve for the well-being of our planet and all future generations.
COURTESY : Bernard Marr
Where is required Sustainable technology of 4830 ?
It’s more accurate to say that sustainable technology will be needed everywhere in 4830, rather than pinpointing specific locations. Here’s why:
- Global Challenges: The environmental challenges we face today, like climate change, resource depletion, and pollution, are global issues. They don’t respect national borders and will impact every corner of the planet. Therefore, sustainable solutions will be needed everywhere.
- Interconnected Systems: In 4830, it’s likely that global systems will be even more interconnected than they are today. This means that environmental problems in one region could have far-reaching consequences for the entire world. Sustainable technology will be crucial for maintaining the stability and resilience of these interconnected systems.
- Human Habitats: Whether humans still live primarily on Earth, have colonized other planets, or exist in some other form, they will need sustainable technology to survive and thrive. This includes providing food, water, energy, and shelter in a way that doesn’t harm the environment.
However, we can imagine some areas where sustainable technology might be particularly critical in 4830:
- Urban Centers: Cities are likely to be even larger and more densely populated in 4830. Sustainable technology will be essential for managing resources, reducing pollution, and creating livable urban environments.
- Remote Locations: If humans have expanded beyond Earth, colonies on other planets or in space will need to be entirely self-sufficient. Sustainable technology will be crucial for providing all the necessities of life in these remote locations.
- Industrial Areas: Manufacturing and other industrial activities will need to be completely sustainable in 4830. This means using renewable energy, minimizing waste, and preventing pollution.
- Agricultural Regions: Sustainable agriculture will be essential for feeding a growing population. This includes using less land, water, and pesticides, while still producing enough food.
Ultimately, sustainable technology will be needed wherever humans live and wherever they interact with the environment. It’s not just about specific locations, but about creating a sustainable way of life for all.
It’s important to remember that the development and use of sustainable technology is a continuous process. It’s not something that will be “solved” by 4830. We need to start now and continue to innovate and improve to ensure a healthy planet for future generations.
How is required Sustainable technology of 4830 ?
It’s not about how sustainable technology is required in 4830, but rather why and what kind of sustainable technology will be necessary. Here’s a breakdown:
Why Sustainable Technology Will Be Essential in 4830:
- Resource Scarcity: Even with careful management, many resources we rely on today may be depleted or extremely scarce by 4830. Sustainable technology will be crucial for resource extraction, recycling, and finding alternatives.
- Climate Change Impacts: The effects of climate change will likely continue to unfold for centuries. Sustainable technologies will be needed to mitigate further damage, adapt to changing conditions, and potentially even reverse some of the negative impacts.
- Environmental Degradation: Pollution, habitat loss, and other forms of environmental degradation will need to be addressed and reversed. Sustainable technologies will be essential for cleaning up the environment and preventing further damage.
- Population Needs: Whether the human population is larger, smaller, or spread across multiple planets, sustainable technologies will be needed to provide food, water, energy, and shelter for everyone.
What Kind of Sustainable Technology Will Be Needed:
- Advanced Renewable Energy: Solar, wind, geothermal, and other renewable energy sources will need to be highly efficient and reliable. New forms of renewable energy may also be discovered and harnessed.
- Closed-Loop Systems: Manufacturing, agriculture, and other industries will need to operate on closed-loop systems, where resources are reused and waste is minimized.
- Resource Regeneration: Technologies that can regenerate natural resources, such as forests, soil, and water, will be crucial for maintaining a healthy planet.
- Climate Engineering: It’s possible that technologies to actively manage the climate, such as carbon capture and solar radiation management, may be necessary to mitigate the impacts of climate change.
- Biotechnology: Advances in biotechnology could lead to new ways of producing food, materials, and energy sustainably.
- Space-Based Technologies: If humans have expanded beyond Earth, sustainable technologies will be needed for space travel, resource extraction on other planets, and creating self-sustaining colonies.
It’s important to remember that the specific technologies that will be needed in 4830 are impossible to predict. However, it’s safe to say that they will need to be:
- Efficient: They will need to use resources sparingly and minimize waste.
- Renewable: They will need to rely on renewable energy sources and regenerative processes.
- Resilient: They will need to be able to withstand the impacts of climate change and other environmental challenges.
- Equitable: They will need to be accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or social status.
Ultimately, the development and use of sustainable technology is a continuous process. It’s not something that will be “solved” by 4830. We need to start now and continue to innovate and improve to ensure a healthy planet for future generations.
Case study is Sustainable technology of 4830 ?
It’s impossible to create a real case study for sustainable technology in 4830. A case study analyzes a specific situation, and we can’t observe the future. However, we can create a hypothetical case study, a thought experiment, to explore what might be necessary and how we might get there.
Hypothetical Case Study: The Martian Terraforming Project – Year 4830
Background:
By 4830, humanity has established a thriving, self-sustaining colony on Mars. Initial terraforming efforts, begun centuries earlier, have made the Martian atmosphere breathable, though still requiring technological assistance for optimal conditions. This case study examines the role of sustainable technology in maintaining the Martian environment and supporting the colony’s long-term survival.
Challenge:
Maintaining the delicate balance of the Martian ecosystem is a constant challenge. The thin atmosphere, low gravity, and lack of a strong magnetic field make Mars vulnerable to solar radiation and other environmental hazards. Furthermore, the colony’s growing population requires increasing amounts of energy, food, and resources.
Sustainable Technologies in Use:
- Advanced Bio-Regenerative Systems: The Martian colony relies on closed-loop life support systems that recycle water, air, and waste. These systems utilize advanced bioreactors and genetically engineered microorganisms to break down waste and produce essential nutrients.
- Fusion-Based Energy Grid: A network of fusion power plants provides clean and abundant energy for the colony. These plants utilize deuterium extracted from Martian ice and helium-3 mined from the Moon.
- Atmospheric Regulation Network: A network of automated drones and ground-based stations monitors and regulates the Martian atmosphere. These systems release trace gases to maintain the desired composition and protect against harmful radiation.
- 3D-Printed Habitats and Infrastructure: Martian colonists utilize advanced 3D printing technology to construct habitats, infrastructure, and tools from locally sourced materials. This minimizes the need for imports from Earth and reduces waste.
- Vertical Farming and Hydroponics: Large-scale vertical farms and hydroponic systems provide the colony with a sustainable source of food. These systems use minimal water and land, and are powered by renewable energy.
- AI-Powered Resource Management: Sophisticated AI systems manage the colony’s resources, optimizing energy use, water distribution, and waste recycling. These systems also predict and respond to potential environmental threats.
Results and Analysis:
The Martian colony serves as a testament to the power of sustainable technology. By utilizing closed-loop systems, renewable energy, and advanced resource management techniques, the colony has achieved a high degree of self-sufficiency and minimized its environmental impact. The success of the Martian terraforming project demonstrates the potential for humanity to create sustainable societies beyond Earth.
Lessons Learned:
- Long-term vision is essential: The Martian terraforming project required centuries of planning and investment. Sustainable development requires a long-term perspective and a commitment to future generations.
- Interdisciplinary collaboration is crucial: The success of the Martian colony relied on the expertise of scientists, engineers, and other professionals from a wide range of disciplines. Sustainable solutions require interdisciplinary collaboration and a holistic approach.
- Continuous innovation is necessary: The challenges of maintaining a sustainable colony on Mars require constant innovation and improvement. Sustainable development is an ongoing process that requires continuous learning and adaptation.
Conclusion:
While this is a fictional case study, it illustrates the kind of sustainable technologies that might be necessary for human civilization to thrive in the distant future. It also highlights the importance of long-term planning, interdisciplinary collaboration, and continuous innovation in achieving sustainability. By learning from the hypothetical challenges and solutions of the Martian colony, we can better prepare ourselves for the real challenges of creating a sustainable future on Earth.
COURTESY : Tech Evaluate
White paper on Sustainable technology of 4830 ?
White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 4830 – A Speculative Exploration
Abstract:
This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 4830. Given the vast timescale, predictions are inherently speculative, but by extrapolating current trends, considering potential future challenges, and engaging in thought experiments, we can paint a plausible picture of the technologies that might be crucial for human civilization (or its successors) to thrive. This paper emphasizes the interconnectedness of various technological domains and the necessity of a holistic approach to sustainability.
1. Introduction:
The challenges of the 21st century – climate change, resource depletion, pollution – are driving a global push for sustainable solutions. Looking forward to 4830, we must assume that these challenges will either have been overcome or will have fundamentally reshaped human society. This paper posits that sustainable technology will be absolutely essential for survival and prosperity in 4830, regardless of the specific form that society takes.
2. Key Drivers of Sustainable Technology in 4830:
- Resource Scarcity: Even with aggressive recycling and efficient resource utilization, certain resources will likely be scarce. This will drive innovation in material science, closed-loop manufacturing, and alternative resource acquisition (e.g., asteroid mining, advanced recycling).
- Climate Change Legacy: The long-term effects of climate change will continue to be felt for centuries. Technologies for climate remediation, adaptation, and potentially even geoengineering may be necessary.
- Population Dynamics: Whether the global population is larger, smaller, or distributed across multiple planets, sustainable technologies will be needed to provide for basic needs (food, water, energy) in an environmentally responsible manner.
- Interplanetary Expansion: If humanity has expanded beyond Earth, sustainable technologies will be even more critical for establishing and maintaining self-sufficient colonies in space or on other planets.
3. Potential Sustainable Technologies in 4830:
- Advanced Energy Systems: Fusion power, highly efficient solar energy capture (perhaps space-based), and potentially even more exotic energy sources may be commonplace. Energy storage solutions will be highly advanced, enabling efficient distribution and utilization of renewable energy.
- Closed-Loop Material Economy: Manufacturing will likely operate on closed-loop systems, where resources are continuously recycled and reused. Advanced materials science will produce durable, biodegradable, or easily recyclable materials.
- Precision Agriculture and Food Production: Vertical farming, hydroponics, aeroponics, and potentially even lab-grown meat will be highly optimized to minimize land use, water consumption, and environmental impact.
- Biotechnology and Synthetic Biology: These fields could provide solutions for producing biofuels, creating biodegradable materials, enhancing agricultural productivity, and even remediating environmental damage.
- Advanced Water Management: Water scarcity will be a major driver of innovation. Technologies for desalination, water purification, and efficient irrigation will be essential.
- Climate Engineering and Geoengineering: While controversial, technologies for carbon capture, solar radiation management, and other forms of geoengineering may be necessary to mitigate the ongoing effects of climate change.
- Artificial Intelligence and Automation: AI will play a crucial role in optimizing resource utilization, managing complex systems, and accelerating the development of new sustainable technologies.
- Space-Based Infrastructure: If humanity has expanded into space, technologies for space-based solar power, asteroid mining, and in-situ resource utilization will be essential.
4. Challenges and Considerations:
- Ethical Implications: The development and deployment of advanced technologies, particularly in areas like biotechnology and geoengineering, will raise complex ethical questions. Careful consideration must be given to the potential risks and unintended consequences.
- Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource depletion will require international cooperation and a shared commitment to sustainability.
- Accessibility and Equity: Sustainable technologies must be accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status. Ensuring equity in access to resources and opportunities will be crucial for creating a just and sustainable future.
5. Conclusion:
While predicting the future is an exercise in speculation, it’s clear that sustainable technology will be absolutely essential for the long-term survival and prosperity of human civilization (or its successors) in 4830. By focusing on innovation, collaboration, and ethical considerations, we can pave the way for a future where technology and sustainability go hand in hand. The choices we make today will determine the world of 4830, making the pursuit of sustainable solutions an imperative for our time.
Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4830 ?
It’s fascinating to imagine the industrial landscape of 4830 and how sustainable technologies might be integrated. Here are some potential applications, keeping in mind this is speculative territory:
1. Advanced Manufacturing & Resource Management
- Closed-loop Production: Factories operate on principles of complete resource regeneration. Raw materials are sourced sustainably (perhaps from recycled materials, asteroid mining, or lab-grown resources), and every byproduct is reused or repurposed. Waste is virtually nonexistent.
- Adaptive Manufacturing Systems: AI-powered systems design and optimize production processes in real-time, minimizing energy consumption and material waste. Factories can rapidly reconfigure to produce different goods as needed, reducing the need for stockpiles and obsolescence.
- 3D Printing at Macro and Micro Scales: Advanced 3D printing allows for the on-demand creation of everything from industrial parts to entire structures, using locally sourced materials or recycled resources. This technology could even be used to create microscopic machines for specialized tasks within industrial processes.
2. Energy Production & Distribution
- Fusion Power as the Norm: Fusion energy is likely a primary source, providing clean and abundant power to industries of all sizes.
- Space-Based Solar Power: Massive solar arrays in orbit capture sunlight and beam energy to Earth (or other planets), providing a continuous and reliable source of renewable energy.
- Smart Grids & Microgrids: Energy distribution is managed by intelligent networks that optimize energy flow and minimize losses. Industries can operate independently on microgrids powered by local renewable sources, increasing resilience and reducing reliance on centralized systems.
3. Resource Extraction & Processing
- Sustainable Mining: Mining operations are highly automated and utilize techniques that minimize environmental impact. Resources are extracted with precision, and land is restored to its original state.
- Asteroid Mining: For resources scarce on Earth, industries may turn to mining asteroids and other celestial bodies. This would require advanced robotics, autonomous spacecraft, and efficient resource processing technologies.
- Biorefineries: Industrial facilities utilize biological processes to transform renewable resources into fuels, chemicals, and materials. These biorefineries operate on closed-loop systems, minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization.
4. Transportation & Logistics
- Hyperloop Networks: High-speed transportation networks like hyperloops connect industrial centers, enabling the rapid and efficient movement of goods and people.
- Autonomous Vehicles & Drones: AI-powered vehicles and drones manage logistics, optimizing routes and minimizing fuel consumption.
- Sustainable Aviation: If air travel is still necessary, it would likely be powered by biofuels or synthetic fuels produced sustainably.
5. Environmental Remediation & Monitoring
- Advanced Pollution Control: Industries utilize highly efficient systems to capture and neutralize pollutants, preventing them from entering the environment.
- Climate Engineering Technologies: Some industries might be involved in developing and deploying technologies to mitigate the effects of climate change, such as carbon capture and storage.
- Global Monitoring Systems: A network of sensors and AI systems constantly monitors the environment, providing real-time data on pollution levels, resource availability, and ecosystem health.
Important Considerations:
- AI & Automation: Artificial intelligence will likely play a central role in optimizing industrial processes, managing resources, and developing new sustainable technologies.
- Biotechnology: Advances in biotechnology could lead to new ways of producing materials, fuels, and chemicals sustainably.
- Ethical Considerations: The development and deployment of advanced technologies will raise complex ethical questions that must be carefully considered.
It’s important to remember that this is just a glimpse into the potential industrial landscape of 4830. The specific technologies that will be used will depend on the challenges that humanity faces in the coming centuries and the choices we make today. However, it’s clear that sustainable technology will be essential for creating a thriving and environmentally responsible industrial sector in the future.
Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4830 ?
It’s exciting to think about the research and development that might be happening in 4830! While we can’t know for sure, we can speculate based on current trends and potential future needs. Here are some areas where R&D might be focused:
1. Fundamental Science & Understanding
- Advanced Physics: Continued exploration of fundamental physics could unlock new energy sources (perhaps beyond fusion), new forms of propulsion, or even manipulation of gravity.
- Complex Systems Theory: Understanding how complex systems (like ecosystems, climate systems, or even societies) work will be crucial for managing resources and mitigating environmental risks.
- Consciousness & AI: Research into consciousness and artificial intelligence could lead to breakthroughs in how we interact with technology and how we understand our place in the universe.
2. Energy & Resources
- Exotic Energy Sources: R&D might explore harnessing zero-point energy, dark matter, or other theoretical energy sources.
- Advanced Material Science: Developing super-strong, ultra-lightweight, self-healing, or even programmable materials could revolutionize construction, manufacturing, and transportation.
- Resource Regeneration: Research into technologies that can regenerate natural resources (like forests, soil, or water) could be essential for long-term sustainability.
3. Biotechnology & Life Sciences
- Synthetic Biology: Creating artificial life forms or modifying existing ones could lead to breakthroughs in medicine, agriculture, and environmental remediation.
- Genetic Engineering: Advanced genetic engineering might be used to enhance human capabilities, create disease-resistant crops, or even engineer entire ecosystems.
- Bioregenerative Systems: R&D in closed-loop life support systems will be crucial for space colonization and potentially for creating self-sustaining ecosystems on Earth.
4. Space & Extraterrestrial Resources
- Advanced Propulsion: Developing faster and more efficient methods of space travel will be essential for exploring the galaxy and potentially colonizing other planets.
- In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU): Technologies for extracting and utilizing resources from other planets or asteroids will be crucial for space colonization and potentially for supplementing Earth’s resources.
- Terraforming & Planetary Engineering: Research into how to modify the environments of other planets to make them habitable for humans could be a long-term goal.
5. Artificial Intelligence & Automation
- General AI: Developing artificial intelligence that can perform any intellectual task that a human being can could revolutionize many aspects of life.
- Autonomous Systems: Highly sophisticated autonomous systems could manage infrastructure, explore space, and even conduct scientific research.
- Human-Computer Interfaces: Advanced interfaces could allow humans to interact with technology in more intuitive and seamless ways.
Important Considerations:
- Ethical Implications: R&D in these areas will need to be guided by strong ethical principles to ensure that new technologies are used responsibly and for the benefit of all.
- Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Addressing complex challenges will require collaboration between scientists, engineers, and other experts from a wide range of disciplines.
- Long-Term Vision: R&D in sustainable technology requires a long-term perspective and a commitment to investing in the future.
It’s important to remember that this is just a speculative look at the potential research and development landscape of 4830. The actual focus of R&D will depend on the challenges and opportunities that humanity faces in the coming centuries. However, it’s clear that continued investment in science and technology will be essential for creating a sustainable future.
COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS
References
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
- ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
- ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
- ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
- ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
- ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
- ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
- ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
- ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
- ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
- ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
- ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
- ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
- ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
- ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
- ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
- ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
- ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
- ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
- ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
- ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
- ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
- ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
- ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
- ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
- ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
- ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
- ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
- ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
- ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
- ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
- ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
- ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
- ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
- ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
- ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
- ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
- ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
- ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
- ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
- ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
- ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
- ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
- ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
- ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
- ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
- ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
- ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
- ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
- ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
- ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
- ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
- ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
- ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
- ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
- ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
- ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
- ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
- ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
- ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
- ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
- ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
- ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
- ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
- ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
- ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
- ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
- ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
- ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
- ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
- ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
- ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
- ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
- ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
- ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
- ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
- ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
- ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
- ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
- ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
- ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
- ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
- ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
- ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
- ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
- ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.