Sustainable technology of 4820

79 / 100

Sustainable technology of 4820 ?

It appears you’re asking about sustainable technology related to something numbered 4820. This could refer to a specific product, model, or standard.

To give you the most relevant information, I need more context. Could you please clarify what 4820 refers to? For example:

Is it a product code? If so, what type of product is it (e.g., a machine, a material, a software)?
Is it a model number? What is the brand or type of equipment?
Is it a standard or regulation? What area does it relate to (e.g., environmental, manufacturing, safety)?

Once I have this information, I can provide you with details on the sustainable technologies associated with it.

In the meantime, here are some general examples of sustainable technologies that might be relevant, depending on what 4820 refers to:

Energy efficiency: This could include technologies that reduce energy consumption, such as LED lighting, efficient appliances, and building insulation.
Renewable energy: This involves using sources like solar, wind, and hydro power to generate electricity.
Waste reduction and recycling: Technologies that help minimize waste and maximize the reuse of materials, such as composting systems and advanced recycling processes.
Sustainable materials: This includes using materials that are renewable, recycled, or have a lower environmental impact, such as bamboo, bioplastics, and recycled metals.
Water conservation: Technologies that help save water, such as low-flow fixtures, rainwater harvesting systems, and efficient irrigation methods.

I look forward to your clarification so I can provide more specific information!

What is Sustainable technology of 4820 ?

Unfortunately, without knowing what “4820” refers to, it’s impossible to give you specific information about its sustainable technology.

However, based on the information I have, it seems likely that “4820” is a product code or model number for an Intel Xeon processor. This is supported by search results that show “Intel Xeon Processor E7-4820” as a specific product.

If this is correct, then the sustainable technology aspects would likely relate to:

Energy efficiency: Intel processors are designed to be increasingly energy-efficient, reducing power consumption and heat generation. This contributes to lower operating costs and a smaller carbon footprint.
Manufacturing processes: Intel has initiatives to reduce the environmental impact of its manufacturing processes, including water conservation, waste reduction, and the use of renewable energy.
Lifecycle management: Intel aims to improve the environmental performance of its products throughout their lifecycle, from design and manufacturing to use and end-of-life recycling.

To get more detailed information, you could:

Visit the Intel website: Search for “Intel Xeon Processor E7-4820” on Intel’s website to find detailed specifications and information about its features, including any sustainability-related initiatives.
Contact Intel directly: You can contact Intel’s customer support or sales team to inquire about the sustainability aspects of this specific processor.

Remember that technology is constantly evolving, and newer processors may offer even more advanced sustainable features.

If “4820” refers to something else entirely, please provide more context so I can assist you further!

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4820 ?

It seems you’re asking who needs the sustainable technology associated with the Intel Xeon Processor E7-4820. Here’s a breakdown of who benefits:

Data centers: These are large facilities that house servers and networking equipment. They consume significant amounts of energy, so energy-efficient processors like the E7-4820 are crucial for reducing operational costs and environmental impact.
Businesses using servers: Companies of all sizes that rely on servers for their operations (e.g., for websites, databases, or applications) can benefit from the energy efficiency and reduced environmental footprint offered by this processor.
Cloud service providers: Companies that offer cloud computing services use massive data centers. Sustainable technology in their processors helps them reduce energy consumption and meet their own sustainability goals, which can also be a selling point for environmentally conscious customers.
Individuals: While individuals don’t directly use this processor, they benefit indirectly from the increased efficiency and reduced environmental impact of the data centers and servers that power many of the online services and applications they use daily.
The environment: Ultimately, the environment benefits from the reduced energy consumption and lower carbon footprint associated with sustainable technology in processors like the E7-4820.

In summary, the need for sustainable technology in processors like the Intel Xeon E7-4820 is driven by the increasing demand for computing power, the high energy consumption of data centers and servers, and the growing awareness of environmental issues. Everyone from large corporations to individual users and the environment itself benefits from these advancements.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4820 ?

It seems you’re asking about the timeline for needing sustainable technology in processors like the Intel Xeon E7-4820. The answer is: It has been needed for a long time, and it’s increasingly critical now and in the future.

Here’s why:

Past: Even when the Intel Xeon E7-4820 was released (around 2011), the energy consumption of data centers and servers was already a significant concern. The need for sustainable technology to mitigate this impact has been present for many years.
Present: With the ever-increasing reliance on digital technologies, the demand for computing power continues to grow exponentially. This translates to more data centers, more servers, and higher energy consumption. The need for sustainable technology in processors is more urgent than ever to minimize the environmental footprint of this growth.
Future: As technology advances and our dependence on it deepens, the need for sustainable solutions will only intensify. Future processors will need to be even more energy-efficient and environmentally friendly to keep pace with the increasing demand while minimizing the impact on the planet.

In essence, the need for sustainable technology in processors is not a question of “when” but rather a continuous and escalating requirement. It’s an ongoing challenge that the technology industry must address to ensure a sustainable future for computing.

This includes not only improving processor efficiency but also focusing on:

Sustainable data center design and operation: Optimizing cooling systems, using renewable energy sources, and minimizing waste.
Software optimization: Developing more efficient software that requires less processing power.
Circular economy approaches: Designing processors for longer lifespans, easier repair, and responsible recycling.

By addressing these challenges, we can ensure that the benefits of technology continue to grow while minimizing its environmental impact.

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4820 ?

You’re asking a great question that gets to the heart of why sustainable technology in processors is so important! Here’s where it’s required:

Data Centers: This is the biggest and most obvious need. Data centers are the backbone of the internet and modern computing. They consume massive amounts of energy to power and cool the servers they house. Sustainable processors are essential to reduce the environmental impact of these energy-hungry facilities.
Servers: Whether in a data center or a smaller business, servers are the workhorses of computing. They power websites, applications, databases, and more. Sustainable processors are crucial for making these servers more energy-efficient and reducing their operating costs.
Cloud Computing: Cloud providers rely on huge data centers to deliver their services. Sustainable processors help them minimize their energy consumption and meet their own sustainability goals, which can be a competitive advantage.
Edge Computing: As computing moves closer to the edge of the network (e.g., in IoT devices, autonomous vehicles, and smart cities), sustainable processors become even more important. These devices often have limited power budgets, making energy efficiency a key requirement.
Enterprise and Small Businesses: Any business that uses servers or computing infrastructure needs sustainable processors. This helps them lower energy costs, reduce their carbon footprint, and meet their own sustainability targets.
Homes and Personal Devices: While not as direct, the need for sustainable processors extends to our homes and personal devices. As we rely more on connected devices and online services, the energy efficiency of the underlying infrastructure becomes increasingly important.

In essence, sustainable technology in processors is required wherever computing takes place. This includes large data centers, small server rooms, and even the devices we use every day. It’s a fundamental requirement for minimizing the environmental impact of the digital age.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4820 ?

You’re asking how sustainable technology is required for processors like the Intel Xeon E7-4820. Here’s a breakdown of the key drivers:

1. Energy Consumption:

Data Centers: Data centers are massive consumers of electricity, primarily for powering servers and cooling systems. Sustainable processors are essential to reduce this energy demand.
Operating Costs: Lower energy consumption translates directly into lower operating costs for businesses and data center operators.
Environmental Impact: Reducing energy consumption is crucial for minimizing the carbon footprint associated with computing.

2. Heat Generation:

Cooling Requirements: Processors generate heat, which needs to be dissipated to maintain optimal performance. This often requires energy-intensive cooling systems. Sustainable processors, with their lower heat output, reduce the need for such systems.
System Reliability: Excessive heat can negatively impact the reliability and lifespan of processors and other components. Sustainable processors contribute to a more stable and reliable computing environment.

3. Resource Efficiency:

Manufacturing: The manufacturing of processors involves the use of raw materials and energy. Sustainable practices aim to minimize the environmental impact of this process.
Lifecycle Management: Sustainable technology considers the entire lifecycle of a processor, from design and manufacturing to use and end-of-life recycling. This includes maximizing the lifespan of processors and ensuring responsible disposal or reuse of materials.

4. Performance Optimization:

Energy-Efficient Performance: Sustainable processors are designed to deliver high performance while minimizing energy consumption. This is achieved through architectural optimizations, advanced manufacturing processes, and intelligent power management features.
Performance per Watt: A key metric for sustainable processors is performance per watt, which measures how much computing power is delivered for each unit of energy consumed.

5. Environmental Regulations and Corporate Social Responsibility:

Regulations: Governments and organizations are increasingly implementing regulations to promote energy efficiency and reduce environmental impact. Sustainable processors help businesses comply with these regulations.
Corporate Social Responsibility: Many companies have set sustainability goals and are actively seeking ways to reduce their environmental footprint. Sustainable technology in processors is a key component of these efforts.

In summary, sustainable technology is required for processors like the Intel Xeon E7-4820 to address the growing energy demands of computing, minimize environmental impact, optimize resource utilization, and meet regulatory requirements and corporate social responsibility goals. It’s a crucial aspect of ensuring a sustainable future for the technology industry.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4820 ?

Unfortunately, finding a specific case study focused solely on the sustainable technology of the Intel Xeon E7-4820 processor might be difficult. This is because:

Older Technology: The E7-4820 is an older processor (released around 2011). Case studies tend to focus on newer technologies and advancements.
Component Focus: Case studies often examine broader systems (like data centers) rather than individual components like processors.

However, we can still explore some relevant angles and examples:

1. Data Center Efficiency Case Studies:

Focus: Many case studies highlight how data centers have improved their overall sustainability by implementing various strategies, including using energy-efficient hardware.
Relevance: While not specific to the E7-4820, these studies demonstrate the impact of processor efficiency on data center sustainability. They often involve analyzing power consumption, cooling requirements, and carbon footprint reduction.
Examples: You can find case studies on data center sustainability initiatives by companies like Google, Microsoft, and Amazon. These often include information about their hardware choices and the resulting energy savings.

2. Intel’s Sustainability Initiatives:

Focus: Intel publishes reports and case studies on its own sustainability efforts, which include improving the energy efficiency of its processors.
Relevance: While not solely about the E7-4820, these resources provide insights into Intel’s approach to sustainable processor design and manufacturing.
Examples: Intel’s website and sustainability reports often feature case studies on their manufacturing processes, water conservation efforts, and the lifecycle assessment of their products.

3. Academic Research:

Focus: Academic research papers may delve into the specific energy efficiency improvements of older processors like the E7-4820.
Relevance: These papers might provide detailed analysis of the processor’s architecture, power management features, and their contribution to sustainability.
Examples: You can search academic databases like IEEE Xplore or ACM Digital Library for research papers on energy-efficient processors or sustainable computing.

Key Takeaway:

While a dedicated case study on the E7-4820 might be elusive, you can still find valuable information about its sustainable technology aspects by exploring broader case studies on data center efficiency, Intel’s sustainability initiatives, and academic research on energy-efficient processors. These resources will help you understand the context and impact of sustainable technology in processors like the E7-4820, even if it’s not the sole focus.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4820 ?

Unfortunately, finding a dedicated white paper specifically on the sustainable technology of the Intel Xeon E7-4820 is unlikely. This processor is older, and white papers tend to focus on newer generations and broader trends. Also, detailed technical information about specific older processors isn’t usually the subject of publicly available white papers.

However, you can find information related to the sustainable aspects of this general class of processors and Intel’s approach by looking at these resources:

Intel’s Sustainability Reports: Intel publishes comprehensive sustainability reports that detail their overall environmental initiatives, including their efforts to improve the energy efficiency of their processors and reduce their environmental footprint. These reports often contain data on energy consumption, water usage, waste reduction, and other sustainability metrics. Look for these on Intel’s website.
Intel’s Server and Data Center Publications: Intel often releases white papers and technical documents related to their server and data center technologies. While these might not focus solely on the E7-4820, they often discuss power management features, thermal design considerations, and other aspects relevant to sustainable computing. Search Intel’s site using keywords like “server power efficiency,” “data center sustainability,” or “Intel Xeon power management.”
General White Papers on Sustainable IT: Many organizations and industry bodies publish white papers on sustainable IT practices, which often include discussions of energy-efficient hardware, data center optimization, and lifecycle management. These resources can provide valuable context for understanding the role of processors like the E7-4820 in a broader sustainability strategy. Look for white papers from organizations like the Green Grid, the U.S. Green Building Council, or similar groups.
Academic Research: Academic papers on energy-efficient computing and processor design might contain relevant information. Searching academic databases (like IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, ScienceDirect) using keywords like “energy-efficient processors,” “sustainable computing,” or “low-power design” could yield useful results.

What to Look For in Related Documents:

Even if you don’t find a white paper on the specific processor, look for information on these topics in the resources mentioned above:

Power Management Features: How does the processor dynamically adjust its power consumption based on workload?
Thermal Design: How is heat generated by the processor managed, and what are the implications for cooling requirements?
Manufacturing Process: What sustainable practices are used in the manufacturing of the processor?
Lifecycle Assessment: What is the environmental impact of the processor throughout its lifecycle, from manufacturing to end-of-life?

By exploring these related resources, you can gain a good understanding of the sustainable aspects of the Intel Xeon E7-4820 and similar processors, even without a dedicated white paper.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4820 ?

While the Intel Xeon E7-4820 is an older processor, its sustainable technology aspects were still relevant for its time and can provide insights into how sustainability has evolved in industrial applications. Here are some key areas where its sustainable features would have been valuable:

1. Manufacturing and Production:

Reduced Energy Consumption: Factories and manufacturing plants often have significant computing needs for tasks like design, simulation, process control, and data analysis. Energy-efficient processors like the E7-4820 helped reduce the overall energy consumption of these operations, contributing to lower operating costs and a smaller carbon footprint.
Thermal Management: Manufacturing environments can be demanding in terms of temperature and cooling requirements. The E7-4820’s thermal design and power management features helped reduce heat generation, potentially simplifying cooling systems and further improving energy efficiency.

2. Data Centers and IT Infrastructure:

Industrial Automation: Many industrial processes rely on data centers and server infrastructure for automation, monitoring, and control. The E7-4820 would have been suitable for servers in these environments, contributing to their energy efficiency and reducing the environmental impact of these critical systems.
High-Performance Computing: Some industrial applications, such as product design, materials research, and simulations, require high-performance computing (HPC). The E7-4820, with its multi-core architecture and support for large memory capacity, could have been used in HPC clusters, where its energy efficiency would be particularly valuable.

3. Telecommunications and Networking:

Network Infrastructure: Telecom companies use servers and networking equipment to manage their networks and deliver services. The E7-4820 could have been used in these systems, helping to reduce energy consumption and operational costs in a sector that is crucial for modern industries.

4. Research and Development:

Scientific Computing: Research and development in various industrial sectors often involves complex simulations, data analysis, and modeling. The E7-4820 could have been used in research labs and scientific computing clusters, where its energy efficiency would have been beneficial for both cost and environmental reasons.

Key Considerations:

Scalability: The E7-4820 was designed for multi-socket configurations, allowing it to scale to meet the demands of large industrial applications.
Reliability: Industrial environments often require high reliability and uptime. The E7-4820 included features to enhance system reliability and data integrity.

Evolution of Sustainable Technology:

It’s important to note that sustainable technology in processors has advanced significantly since the E7-4820. Newer generations of Intel Xeon processors offer even greater energy efficiency, performance per watt, and advanced features for thermal management and power optimization. However, the principles of sustainability that were relevant to the E7-4820 – reducing energy consumption, minimizing heat generation, and optimizing resource utilization – remain crucial for industrial applications today.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4820 ?

While the Intel Xeon E7-4820 is an older processor, it still represents an important step in the evolution of sustainable technology in processors. Here’s how research and development (R&D) efforts likely contributed to its sustainable features:

1. Energy Efficiency:

Microarchitecture Optimization: R&D would have focused on designing a processor architecture that minimizes energy consumption while maintaining performance. This includes optimizing instruction execution, reducing power leakage, and improving cache utilization.
Power Management: Developing advanced power management techniques to dynamically adjust the processor’s power consumption based on workload demands. This could include features like Intel SpeedStep Technology, which allows the processor to operate at different clock speeds and voltages to optimize power usage.

2. Thermal Management:

Thermal Design: R&D would have involved careful thermal design to minimize heat generation and improve heat dissipation. This includes optimizing the layout of components, using materials with high thermal conductivity, and designing efficient heat sinks and cooling solutions.
Cooling Technologies: Exploring and developing new cooling technologies to reduce the energy required for cooling systems in data centers and other environments where the E7-4820 might be used.

3. Manufacturing Processes:

Advanced Lithography: Using advanced manufacturing processes (like the 32nm process used for the E7-4820) to reduce the size of transistors and improve energy efficiency.
Materials Research: Investigating and using more sustainable materials in the manufacturing of processors, including reducing the use of hazardous substances and improving recyclability.

4. Software and System Optimization:

Software Development: Working with software developers to optimize software for energy efficiency, including developing algorithms and programming techniques that minimize processor usage.
System Integration: Collaborating with system integrators to design and build energy-efficient servers and data center infrastructure that take advantage of the E7-4820’s sustainable features.

5. Lifecycle Assessment:

Environmental Impact: Conducting lifecycle assessments to evaluate the environmental impact of the E7-4820 throughout its entire lifecycle, from manufacturing to end-of-life disposal or recycling.
Design for Environment: Using the results of lifecycle assessments to inform the design and development of future processors with even greater sustainability.

Key Takeaways:

The development of sustainable technology in processors like the E7-4820 is a multidisciplinary effort that involves expertise in microarchitecture, power management, thermal design, manufacturing processes, software, and environmental science.
R&D in this area is an ongoing process, with each generation of processors building upon the advancements of previous generations to achieve even greater sustainability.

While the E7-4820 might be considered an older processor, the R&D efforts that went into its sustainable features laid the foundation for the more advanced technologies we see in processors today.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.