Sustainable technology of 4810

79 / 100

Sustainable technology of 4810 ?

It seems like you might be asking about the Epson ET-4810 printer and its sustainable features.

The Epson ET-4810 is designed with sustainability in mind. Here’s how:

High-capacity ink tank system: This reduces the need for frequent ink cartridge replacements, which in turn reduces the use of plastic and metal in consumables.
Recycled materials: The printer incorporates recycled plastic in approximately 30% of its body, reducing the use of new petroleum-derived plastics.
Paper-based packaging: The printer uses cardboard made from recycled paper for cushioning instead of traditional polystyrene, and paper tape instead of plastic tape for transport.

These features contribute to reducing the environmental impact of the printer by:

Conserving resources: Less plastic and metal are used in consumables and the printer body.
Reducing waste: Fewer ink cartridges need to be disposed of, and packaging is made from recycled materials.

Overall, the Epson ET-4810 demonstrates a commitment to sustainable technology by minimizing its environmental footprint through resource efficiency and waste reduction.

What is Sustainable technology of 4810 ?

The Epson ET-4810 incorporates several sustainable technologies to minimize its environmental impact:

High-capacity ink tank system: This reduces the need for frequent ink cartridge replacements, which in turn reduces the use of plastic and metal in consumables.
Recycled materials: The printer incorporates recycled plastic in approximately 30% of its body, reducing the use of new petroleum-derived plastics.
Paper-based packaging: The printer uses cardboard made from recycled paper for cushioning instead of traditional polystyrene, and paper tape instead of plastic tape for transport.

These features contribute to reducing the environmental impact of the printer by:

Conserving resources: Less plastic and metal are used in consumables and the printer body.
Reducing waste: Fewer ink cartridges need to be disposed of, and packaging is made from recycled materials.

Overall, the Epson ET-4810 demonstrates a commitment to sustainable technology by minimizing its environmental footprint through resource efficiency and waste reduction.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4810 ?

The Epson ET-4810’s sustainable technology is beneficial for a wide range of users, including:

Home users: Individuals who print regularly at home can reduce their environmental impact by choosing a printer with sustainable features.
Small offices: Small businesses that prioritize sustainability can benefit from the ET-4810’s resource efficiency and waste reduction.
Eco-conscious consumers: Anyone who is environmentally aware and wants to make responsible choices when purchasing electronics will find the ET-4810 appealing.
Organizations with sustainability goals: Companies and institutions that have set targets for reducing their environmental footprint can use the ET-4810 as part of their sustainability strategy.

Essentially, anyone who wants to minimize their environmental impact while printing can benefit from the sustainable technology incorporated in the Epson ET-4810.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4810 ?

The need for sustainable technology like that in the Epson ET-4810 is not limited to a specific time, but rather it’s an ongoing and increasingly urgent requirement. Here’s why:

Environmental concerns: The impact of human activities on the environment is a pressing issue. Sustainable technology helps reduce resource depletion, pollution, and waste generation.
Resource depletion: Our planet’s resources are finite. Sustainable technology promotes efficient use of resources and reduces our reliance on non-renewable sources.
Waste management: The amount of waste generated is increasing rapidly. Sustainable technology helps minimize waste through recycling, reuse, and reducing consumption.
Cost savings: Sustainable technology can often lead to long-term cost savings through reduced energy consumption, less waste, and lower consumable costs.
Social responsibility: Consumers and businesses are increasingly aware of their environmental impact and are seeking sustainable solutions.

Therefore, the need for sustainable technology like the Epson ET-4810 is relevant:

Now: To address current environmental challenges and promote responsible consumption.
In the future: To ensure a sustainable future for generations to come.

Essentially, the need for sustainable technology is constant and growing as we strive to create a more environmentally responsible and resource-efficient society.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4810 ?

The need for sustainable technology like that found in the Epson ET-4810 is relevant in a wide variety of places and situations. Here are some key areas where it’s particularly important:

Homes: Individuals can make a difference by choosing eco-friendly products for their homes, reducing their overall environmental impact.
Offices: Businesses of all sizes have a responsibility to adopt sustainable practices, and using efficient and environmentally conscious equipment is a key part of that.
Education: Schools and universities can teach students about sustainability by using and promoting eco-friendly technology.
Public spaces: Libraries, community centers, and other public spaces can demonstrate a commitment to sustainability by using products like the ET-4810.
Organizations with sustainability initiatives: Any organization with a focus on environmental responsibility can benefit from incorporating sustainable technology into their operations.

Essentially, anywhere that printing occurs is a place where sustainable technology like that in the Epson ET-4810 is needed. By making conscious choices about the technology we use, we can all contribute to a more sustainable future.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4810 ?

The Epson ET-4810 incorporates sustainable technology through several key features, addressing the “how” of its sustainability:

EcoTank System: This is the core of its sustainability. Instead of disposable cartridges, it uses refillable ink tanks. This drastically reduces plastic waste and the resources needed to manufacture and transport cartridges. Users buy bottles of ink, which are more economical and generate significantly less waste.
Recycled Materials: The printer itself is made with approximately 30% recycled plastic. This reduces the demand for virgin plastic and helps divert existing plastic waste from landfills.
Paper-Based Packaging: Epson uses cardboard made from recycled paper for cushioning and paper tape instead of plastic tape. This makes the packaging more easily recyclable and reduces the use of plastic.
Energy Efficiency: While specific energy consumption figures would need to be checked on Epson’s website, EcoTank printers are generally designed to be energy efficient, further minimizing their environmental impact. Lower energy use translates to lower electricity bills and a smaller carbon footprint.

So, the “how” of the ET-4810’s sustainability is achieved through:

Reduced Consumable Waste: The EcoTank system is the biggest contributor here.
Use of Recycled Materials: Incorporating recycled plastic in the printer’s construction.
Sustainable Packaging: Choosing paper-based materials over plastic.
Energy Efficiency: Designing the printer to minimize energy consumption.

These combined features demonstrate how Epson has integrated sustainability into the design and functionality of the ET-4810.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4810 ?

A case study focusing specifically on the Epson ET-4810 and its sustainable technology might look something like this:

Case Study: Evaluating the Sustainability Impact of the Epson ET-4810 EcoTank Printer

Introduction:

In today’s environmentally conscious world, businesses and consumers are increasingly seeking sustainable technology solutions. This case study examines the Epson ET-4810 EcoTank printer, focusing on its sustainable features and their potential impact on reducing environmental footprint.

Background:

Traditional inkjet printers rely on disposable ink cartridges, contributing significantly to plastic waste. The ET-4810, part of Epson’s EcoTank line, offers a cartridge-free printing solution with refillable ink tanks. This case study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of this approach and other sustainability features incorporated in the ET-4810.

Methodology:

This case study will analyze the ET-4810’s sustainability performance based on the following criteria:

Waste Reduction: Comparison of ink cartridge waste generated by traditional printers versus the refillable ink tank system of the ET-4810. This could involve estimating the number of cartridges saved over the printer’s lifespan.
Recycled Materials: Assessment of the percentage of recycled plastic used in the printer’s construction.
Packaging: Evaluation of the sustainability of the printer’s packaging materials, focusing on recyclability and the absence of harmful materials like polystyrene.
Energy Efficiency: Analysis of the printer’s energy consumption and comparison with traditional inkjet printers. Data from Energy Star ratings or Epson’s own specifications could be used.
User Feedback: Gathering user reviews and testimonials regarding the ease of use and perceived environmental benefits of the EcoTank system.

Findings:

Waste Reduction: The case study would likely highlight the significant reduction in plastic waste due to the EcoTank system. Quantifiable data on cartridge savings would be presented.
Recycled Materials: The percentage of recycled plastic used in the ET-4810 would be stated.
Packaging: The case study would detail the paper-based packaging and its environmental advantages.
Energy Efficiency: Data on the printer’s energy consumption and potential energy savings compared to traditional printers would be presented.
User Feedback: User testimonials would likely emphasize the convenience and environmental benefits of the EcoTank system.

Conclusion:

The case study would conclude that the Epson ET-4810 demonstrates a commitment to sustainable technology through its innovative EcoTank system, use of recycled materials, and eco-friendly packaging. The refillable ink tank system significantly reduces plastic waste, making it a more environmentally responsible choice compared to traditional cartridge-based printers. The case study would likely recommend the ET-4810 for environmentally conscious consumers and businesses seeking to minimize their printing-related environmental impact.

Recommendations:

Further research could be conducted to quantify the long-term environmental benefits of the EcoTank system, including lifecycle assessments.
Epson could explore further increasing the percentage of recycled materials used in their printers.
Continued efforts to educate consumers about the environmental advantages of EcoTank technology are recommended.

This is a framework for a case study. Real-world data and specific details from Epson would be needed to complete the analysis.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4810 ?

## White Paper: The Epson ET-4810 EcoTank Printer: A Sustainable Printing Solution

**Abstract:**

This white paper examines the Epson ET-4810 EcoTank printer and its contributions to sustainable printing practices.  It explores the printer's key features, including its refillable ink tank system, use of recycled materials, and eco-conscious packaging, demonstrating how these elements work together to minimize environmental impact.  The paper argues that the ET-4810 represents a viable and effective solution for individuals and businesses seeking to reduce their printing footprint.

**Introduction:**

The increasing awareness of environmental challenges has driven demand for sustainable technology solutions across all sectors, including printing.  Traditional inkjet printers, reliant on disposable cartridges, contribute significantly to plastic waste and resource depletion.  The Epson ET-4810 EcoTank printer addresses these concerns by offering a cartridge-free printing experience based on refillable ink tanks.  This white paper analyzes the ET-4810's sustainable features and their potential benefits.

**The EcoTank Advantage: Reducing Waste and Saving Resources:**

The core innovation of the ET-4810 is its EcoTank system.  Instead of single-use cartridges, the printer utilizes large, refillable ink tanks.  Users purchase ink in bottles, which are more economical and generate significantly less waste than cartridges.  This system offers several key advantages:

* **Drastic Reduction in Plastic Waste:** The elimination of cartridges significantly reduces the amount of plastic sent to landfills.  Over the lifespan of the printer, the reduction in plastic waste is substantial.
* **Cost Savings:**  Bulk ink bottles are typically more cost-effective per page than cartridges, leading to long-term savings for users.
* **Reduced Resource Consumption:**  Manufacturing and transporting ink cartridges require significant energy and resources.  The EcoTank system minimizes these demands.

**Beyond Ink: Holistic Sustainability:**

The ET-4810's commitment to sustainability extends beyond its ink system:

* **Recycled Materials:** The printer incorporates recycled plastic in its construction, reducing the demand for virgin plastic and diverting existing plastic waste.
* **Eco-Friendly Packaging:** Epson utilizes paper-based packaging made from recycled materials, avoiding the use of polystyrene and other non-recyclable materials.

**Environmental Impact Assessment:**

While a full lifecycle assessment would require more detailed data, the ET-4810's features clearly contribute to a reduced environmental footprint in several areas:

* **Lower Plastic Waste Generation:**  The EcoTank system demonstrably reduces plastic waste compared to traditional cartridge-based printers.
* **Reduced Energy Consumption:**  While specific data should be verified, EcoTank printers are generally designed for energy efficiency, minimizing electricity use.
* **Decreased Resource Depletion:**  The use of recycled materials and the reduced demand for ink cartridges contribute to conserving resources.

**Conclusion:**

The Epson ET-4810 EcoTank printer represents a significant step forward in sustainable printing technology.  Its innovative refillable ink tank system, combined with the use of recycled materials and eco-friendly packaging, offers a compelling solution for individuals and businesses seeking to minimize their environmental impact.  By choosing the ET-4810, users can contribute to reducing plastic waste, conserving resources, and promoting a more sustainable approach to printing.

**Recommendations:**

* Consumers and businesses should consider the long-term environmental and cost benefits of EcoTank printers when making purchasing decisions.
* Further research could quantify the lifecycle environmental impact of EcoTank printers compared to traditional models.
* Manufacturers should continue to innovate and develop even more sustainable printing technologies.

**Disclaimer:**

The information presented in this white paper is for general knowledge and informational purposes only, and does not constitute professional advice.  Specific data and claims should be verified with Epson's official documentation.

This is a sample white paper. You would need to get specific data from Epson to make it truly robust and impactful. Things like exact percentages of recycled material, energy consumption figures, and comparisons to traditional printers would strengthen the arguments.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4810 ?

While the Epson ET-4810 is primarily designed for home and small office use, the principles of its sustainable technology can be applied in larger industrial contexts. The specific ET-4810 model isn’t suitable for high-volume industrial printing, but the core ideas translate. Here’s how:

High-Volume Ink Tank Systems: The concept of refillable ink tanks can be scaled up for industrial printing presses. Imagine large tanks of ink supplying industrial printers, drastically reducing the waste and cost associated with large-format cartridge or other ink container systems. This is already happening to some extent in certain industrial printing sectors.
Closed-Loop Ink Systems: Industrially, even more sophisticated ink management systems can be implemented. These could include systems that recapture unused ink, filter it, and reuse it, minimizing waste even further. This would require advanced engineering and filtration technologies.
Sustainable Substrates: The focus on sustainable materials in the ET-4810 (recycled plastic, paper packaging) can be expanded to industrial printing. This could involve using recycled paper stocks, exploring alternative, more sustainable materials for signage and packaging, and even developing biodegradable inks for certain applications.
Energy Efficiency in Large-Format Printing: Just as the ET-4810 aims for energy efficiency, industrial printing equipment can be designed with energy conservation in mind. This could involve using more efficient motors, optimizing printing processes to reduce energy consumption, and implementing energy recovery systems.
Life Cycle Assessment and Design for Disassembly: Industrial equipment should be designed with its entire life cycle in mind. This includes using durable, recyclable materials, designing for easy disassembly and component reuse, and minimizing waste at the end of the product’s life.
Waste Stream Management: Industrial printing facilities can implement comprehensive waste management programs to recycle or repurpose waste materials, including ink containers, paper scraps, and packaging.

Examples of Industrial Applications (Drawing Inspiration from the ET-4810):

Textile Printing: Imagine large-format textile printers using refillable ink tank systems to reduce dye waste and cost.
Packaging Printing: Industrial printers used for packaging could utilize sustainable substrates and inks, minimizing the environmental impact of packaging materials.
Signage and Display Printing: Large-format printers for signage could incorporate recycled materials and energy-efficient printing technologies.

Key Takeaway:

While the ET-4810 is a small-scale example, it demonstrates the core principles of sustainable printing. These principles – reducing waste, conserving resources, and improving energy efficiency – are highly relevant to industrial printing and can be adapted and scaled up to create more sustainable large-scale printing operations. The challenge lies in developing the technologies and infrastructure to make these adaptations feasible and cost-effective.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4810 ?

That’s a great question! Research and development (R&D) is crucial for advancing sustainable technology in printing, building upon existing innovations like those in the Epson ET-4810. Here are some key areas where R&D efforts are focused:

1. Advanced Ink Technologies:

Biodegradable and Bio-based Inks: Research is ongoing to develop inks derived from renewable resources like plants or algae. These inks would have a lower environmental impact and be biodegradable, reducing pollution.
Nano-particle Inks: These inks use tiny particles to create more vibrant and durable prints while potentially using less ink overall.
Water-based Inks: Further development of water-based inks can minimize the use of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and reduce air pollution.

2. Sustainable Substrates:

Recycled and Upcycled Materials: R&D is exploring ways to use recycled paper and other materials in printing substrates. This includes developing methods to de-ink and reprocess paper efficiently.
Alternative Fibers: Research into using fibers from bamboo, hemp, or other sustainable sources for paper production can reduce reliance on traditional wood pulp.
Biodegradable Substrates: Developing biodegradable materials for specific printing applications like packaging or temporary signage can minimize waste.

3. Printing Process Optimization:

Energy Efficiency: R&D focuses on improving the energy efficiency of printing equipment, including reducing energy consumption during printing and developing more efficient drying or curing methods.
Waste Reduction: Research into digital printing technologies that minimize waste by printing only what is needed and optimizing ink usage is ongoing.
Waterless Printing: Development of waterless printing methods can reduce water consumption and minimize wastewater generation.

4. Circular Economy Approaches:

Design for Disassembly: R&D can focus on designing printing equipment for easy disassembly and component reuse or recycling at the end of its life.
Ink Cartridge Recycling and Refilling: Improving ink cartridge recycling programs and developing more efficient refilling processes can further reduce waste.
Closed-loop Systems: Research into closed-loop systems for ink and material recovery and reuse in industrial printing settings can minimize waste and resource depletion.

5. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Environmental Impact Analysis:

Standardized Methodologies: Developing standardized LCA methodologies for printing technologies can help accurately assess their environmental impact and identify areas for improvement.
Data Collection and Analysis: R&D efforts are needed to collect and analyze data on the environmental impact of various printing technologies and materials throughout their life cycle.

6. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing:

Sustainable Materials: Research into using recycled or bio-based materials for 3D printing can make this technology even more sustainable.
On-Demand Manufacturing: Further development of 3D printing for on-demand manufacturing can reduce waste and overproduction.

Collaboration and Innovation:

Advancing sustainable technology in printing requires collaboration among researchers, industry stakeholders, and policymakers. By fostering innovation and supporting R&D in these key areas, we can move towards a more environmentally responsible and sustainable printing industry.

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.