Leave a Comment / Blog / By
79 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

Sustainable technology of 4610 ?

Several sustainable technologies relate to the number 4610. Here are a few examples:

  • WISE-4610: This is a LoRaWAN IoT Wireless Modular I/O device manufactured by Advantech. It is designed for industrial applications and can be used for remote monitoring and control of various systems, including environmental sensors. This can contribute to sustainability by enabling efficient resource management and reducing waste.Opens in a new windowbr.mouser.com WISE4610 by Advantech
  • CERIFLOW™ 4610: This is a wax crystal modifier produced by SI Group. It is used in the oilfield industry to prevent the formation of paraffin deposits in pipelines. This can improve the efficiency of oil extraction and transportation, reducing energy consumption and environmental impact.Opens in a new windowsiigroup.com CERIFLOW™ 4610 by SI Group
  • Type 4610: This is a type of mechanical seal manufactured by John Crane. It is used in pumps and other rotating equipment to prevent leaks. By improving the reliability and efficiency of industrial processes, these seals can contribute to sustainability.Opens in a new windowwww.johncrane.com Type 4610 by John Crane

These are just a few examples of sustainable technologies that relate to the number 4610. It is important to note that the specific applications and benefits of these technologies may vary depending on the context in which they are used.

What is Sustainable technology of 4610 ?

The number 4610 doesn’t have a widely recognized association with a specific sustainable technology. However, it’s possible that this number could be relevant in a niche context or a specific industry.

To help me understand what you’re looking for, could you please provide more information about the context in which you encountered this number? For example:

  • What industry or field is this related to? (e.g., manufacturing, energy, agriculture)
  • What kind of technology are you interested in? (e.g., renewable energy, waste management, water conservation)
  • Where did you come across this number? (e.g., a product name, a research paper, a website)

With more information, I might be able to identify a specific sustainable technology or provide a more relevant answer.

In the meantime, here are some general examples of how numbers can be related to sustainable technology:

  • Product codes or model numbers: Some sustainable products or devices might have model numbers that include the number 4610.
  • Technical specifications: The number could refer to a specific measurement or parameter related to a sustainable technology, such as the efficiency of a solar panel or the capacity of a battery.
  • Research or development: The number might be associated with a particular research project or development effort in the field of sustainable technology.

I’m ready to assist further once you provide more context!

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4610 ?

Unfortunately, with the information provided, it’s impossible to pinpoint exactly who “requires” sustainable technology related to 4610. This is because “4610” doesn’t have a clear and widely recognized association with a specific sustainable technology.

However, I can offer some general ideas about who might be involved with or benefit from sustainable technologies, and how the number 4610 could potentially fit into those scenarios:

Potential Stakeholders in Sustainable Technologies:

  • Industries: Many industries are actively seeking sustainable solutions to reduce their environmental impact. This includes sectors like manufacturing, energy, transportation, agriculture, and construction. If “4610” relates to a specific technology within one of these industries, then companies in that sector would be the primary stakeholders.
  • Consumers: Individuals are increasingly interested in sustainable products and services. If “4610” is linked to a consumer-oriented technology (e.g., a home energy management system), then consumers would be the ones who “require” it in the sense that they would benefit from using it.
  • Governments and Organizations: Governments at all levels are pushing for greater sustainability through policies and regulations. Organizations, both public and private, are also adopting sustainability goals. If “4610” is connected to technologies that help achieve these goals, then these entities would be stakeholders.
  • Researchers and Developers: Scientists, engineers, and innovators are constantly developing new sustainable technologies. If “4610” is related to a research project or a specific technology under development, then these individuals would be key players.

How “4610” Could Be Relevant:

  • Specific Product or Technology: It’s possible that “4610” is a code or model number for a particular sustainable product or technology. In this case, the stakeholders would be those who use or benefit from that specific item.
  • Technical Standard or Specification: The number could refer to a technical standard, regulation, or specification related to a sustainable practice or technology. In this case, the stakeholders would be those who need to comply with or adhere to that standard.
  • Project or Initiative: “4610” might be associated with a specific sustainability project or initiative. The stakeholders would be those involved in or affected by that project.

To get a more precise answer, please provide more context about where you encountered this number and what kind of sustainable technology you’re interested in.

With more information, I can help you identify the specific stakeholders who might be involved with or benefit from the sustainable technology related to 4610.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4610 ?

Unfortunately, it’s impossible to say exactly when sustainable technology related to “4610” is required without more context. Since “4610” doesn’t have a clear association with a specific technology, we need to consider potential scenarios and how time might be a factor.

Here are some possibilities:

  • Specific Product or Technology: If “4610” is a code for a particular sustainable product, the “when” depends on the product’s lifecycle:
    • Development Phase: It’s “required” when researchers and engineers are designing and testing it.
    • Manufacturing: It’s “required” when companies need to produce and distribute it.
    • Usage: It’s “required” when consumers or industries need to use it to achieve their sustainability goals.
    • Maintenance/Replacement: It’s “required” when the product needs upkeep or replacement with a newer version.
  • Technical Standard or Specification: If “4610” refers to a standard, the “when” is tied to:
    • Implementation: It’s “required” when organizations need to comply with the standard to meet regulations or best practices.
    • Review/Update: It’s “required” when the standard needs to be reviewed and updated to reflect new knowledge or technologies.
  • Project or Initiative: If “4610” is linked to a project, the “when” is determined by the project timeline:
    • Planning/Funding: It’s “required” when the project is being planned and resources are allocated.
    • Execution: It’s “required” during the active phase of the project when activities are carried out.
    • Evaluation/Reporting: It’s “required” when the project’s outcomes are assessed and reported.

To help me narrow down the “when,” please provide more details about:

  • The specific sustainable technology you’re interested in.
  • Where you encountered the number “4610.”
  • Any context about the situation or application.

With more information, I can offer a more precise answer about when the sustainable technology related to “4610” might be required.

COURTESY : TBD Media Group

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4610 ?

Unfortunately, without knowing the specific sustainable technology associated with “4610”, it’s impossible to pinpoint the exact locations where it’s required. However, I can offer some general ideas about where sustainable technologies are typically needed, and how “4610” might fit into those scenarios:

General Locations Where Sustainable Technologies Are Needed:

  • Industries: Manufacturing plants, energy facilities, transportation hubs, agricultural operations, and construction sites are all places where sustainable technologies can be implemented to reduce environmental impact and improve efficiency.
  • Urban Areas: Cities are major consumers of resources and generators of waste. Sustainable technologies are crucial in areas like energy-efficient buildings, public transportation, waste management, and water conservation.
  • Rural Areas: Sustainable technologies are needed in agriculture, forestry, and resource management to ensure long-term productivity and environmental protection.
  • Homes and Buildings: Residential and commercial buildings can benefit from sustainable technologies like solar panels, energy-efficient appliances, and water-saving fixtures.
  • Infrastructure: Transportation networks, power grids, and water systems need to be upgraded with sustainable technologies to improve efficiency and reduce environmental impact.

How “4610” Could Be Relevant:

  • Specific Product or Technology: If “4610” is a code for a particular sustainable product, the “where” depends on the product’s application. For example:
    • WISE-4610: This LoRaWAN IoT device is used in industrial settings for remote monitoring and control of various systems, including environmental sensors. So, it would be “required” in factories, power plants, and other industrial facilities where such monitoring is needed.
    • CERIFLOW™ 4610: This wax crystal modifier is used in the oilfield industry to prevent paraffin deposits in pipelines. So, it would be “required” in oil extraction and transportation operations.
    • Type 4610: This mechanical seal is used in pumps and other rotating equipment in various industries. So, it would be “required” in any facility that uses such equipment, from manufacturing plants to water treatment facilities.
  • Technical Standard or Specification: If “4610” refers to a standard, the “where” is tied to:
    • Industry or Sector: The standard might be specific to a certain industry or sector, making it “required” for organizations operating in that area.
    • Geographic Location: The standard might be mandated by a specific region or country, making it “required” for those operating within that jurisdiction.
  • Project or Initiative: If “4610” is linked to a project, the “where” is determined by the project scope:
    • Local, Regional, or Global: The project might be focused on a specific community, region, or have a global reach, making the technology “required” in those areas.

To get a more precise answer, please provide more details about:

  • The specific sustainable technology you’re interested in.
  • Where you encountered the number “4610.”
  • Any context about the situation or application.

With more information, I can offer a more tailored response about where the sustainable technology related to “4610” might be required.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4610 ?

As mentioned before, without knowing the specific sustainable technology associated with “4610,” it’s impossible to explain precisely how it’s required. “4610” itself doesn’t inherently define a technology or its application. However, I can give you general ways sustainable technologies become “required,” and how “4610” might fit in if it’s related to a specific product, standard, or project.

General Ways Sustainable Technologies Become “Required”:

  • Regulation and Legislation: Governments can mandate the use of certain sustainable technologies through laws, regulations, and building codes. This is a common driver for adoption, especially in areas like emissions control, energy efficiency, and waste management.
  • Market Demand and Consumer Preference: Consumers are increasingly demanding sustainable products and services. This creates a market pull for businesses to adopt sustainable technologies to meet these demands and gain a competitive edge.
  • Cost Savings and Efficiency: Many sustainable technologies offer long-term cost savings through reduced energy consumption, waste reduction, and resource efficiency. Businesses may adopt these technologies to improve their bottom line and operational efficiency.
  • Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Goals: Companies are increasingly setting their own sustainability targets and incorporating sustainable practices into their operations. This can lead them to “require” specific sustainable technologies to achieve their goals.
  • Industry Standards and Best Practices: Industry associations and organizations often develop standards and best practices for sustainable operations. Companies that want to be recognized as leaders in sustainability may choose to adopt these standards, which can necessitate the use of certain technologies.
  • Grants and Incentives: Governments and other organizations may offer grants, subsidies, or tax incentives to encourage the adoption of sustainable technologies. This can make them more financially attractive and thus “required” for projects seeking funding.

How “4610” Could Be Relevant (If it relates to a specific item):

  • Product/Technology: If “4610” is a product code, its “required-ness” depends on its function. For example, if it’s a component in a larger system required for regulatory compliance, then it’s “required” in that context. If it’s a device that improves energy efficiency and companies are aiming for specific energy targets, it becomes “required” to meet those targets.
  • Standard/Specification: If “4610” is a standard number, then it’s “required” in the sense that organizations operating in the relevant industry or region must adhere to it. The “how” is through compliance audits, certifications, and legal enforcement.
  • Project/Initiative: If “4610” is tied to a project, it’s “required” as part of that project’s implementation. The “how” is through project plans, contracts, and deliverables.

To get a more specific answer about how the sustainable technology related to “4610” is required, please provide more information about:

  • The specific sustainable technology you’re interested in.
  • Where you encountered the number “4610.”
  • Any context about the situation or application.

The more context you give, the better I can understand the situation and explain how the technology becomes “required.”

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4610 ?

It’s highly unlikely that “4610” by itself represents a case study of sustainable technology. Numbers like that are usually identifiers (product codes, model numbers, part numbers, etc.) and don’t typically encapsulate the full scope of a case study.

A case study about a sustainable technology would typically involve:

  • A specific technology: A detailed description of the technology itself, how it works, its components, and its underlying principles.
  • A real-world application: The context in which the technology is being used. This could be a specific company, project, or location. This is crucial for a case study.
  • Problem/Challenge: What problem was the sustainable technology trying to solve? Was it reducing emissions, improving energy efficiency, conserving water, etc.?
  • Implementation details: How was the technology implemented? What were the challenges and successes during the implementation process?
  • Results and Outcomes: What were the measurable results of using the technology? Did it achieve its goals? What were the environmental, economic, and social impacts?
  • Lessons Learned: What were the key takeaways from the case study? What best practices were identified? What could be improved in future implementations?

How “4610” might be related to a case study:

  1. Part of a product name: “4610” could be part of the name of a product that’s the subject of a case study. For example, “EcoTech 4610 Water Purification System.” The case study would then be about the system itself, not just the number.
  2. A reference number: It’s possible (though less likely) that a case study document might refer to “4610” as a code or reference number for a specific project or component within the larger technology being studied. Again, the case study itself would be much broader than just the number.

To find relevant case studies:

  • Search for specific sustainable technologies: Instead of focusing on “4610,” try searching for case studies on topics like “solar energy case studies,” “wind power case studies,” “sustainable building case studies,” etc.
  • Look at industry publications and websites: Many organizations and publications focused on sustainability publish case studies of successful projects.
  • Check academic databases: Search for research papers and reports that present case studies of sustainable technology implementations.

If you can provide more context about the type of sustainable technology you’re interested in, I might be able to help you find relevant case studies.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4610 ?

Just like with case studies, it’s highly unlikely that “4610” by itself would be the subject of a white paper on sustainable technology. A white paper is a more in-depth report or guide, usually focusing on a specific problem, solution, or technology. It’s meant to inform and persuade a target audience.

A white paper on a sustainable technology would typically cover:

  • The problem or challenge: What environmental or sustainability issue is being addressed?
  • The proposed solution: A detailed explanation of the sustainable technology being discussed, its principles, and how it works.
  • Benefits and advantages: What are the environmental, economic, and social benefits of using the technology?
  • Implementation considerations: Practical guidance on how to implement the technology, including technical requirements, best practices, and potential challenges.
  • Case studies or examples: Real-world examples of where the technology has been successfully implemented.
  • Future trends and developments: What are the future prospects for the technology? What research and development is ongoing?

How “4610” might be related:

  1. Part of a product or system name: “4610” could be part of the name of a specific product, component, or system that is discussed within a white paper. For example, a white paper on industrial IoT solutions for sustainability might mention the “WISE-4610” as one example of available hardware.
  2. A reference or identifier: It’s remotely possible that a white paper might use “4610” as a code or reference number for a specific project, standard, or component. However, this would be unusual. The white paper itself would be about the broader topic, not just the number.

To find relevant white papers:

  • Search for specific sustainable technology topics: Focus your searches on the type of technology you’re interested in (e.g., “white paper on renewable energy,” “white paper on circular economy,” “white paper on green building”).
  • Check industry websites and publications: Many organizations, companies, and industry associations publish white papers on sustainable technologies relevant to their sectors.
  • Look at research institutions and think tanks: These organizations often produce white papers on various sustainability topics.

If you can tell me more about the specific area of sustainable technology you’re interested in, I can help you find relevant white papers. Just searching for “sustainable technology 4610 white paper” is unlikely to yield useful results.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4610 ?

It’s still difficult to give you specific industrial applications for a sustainable technology related to “4610” without knowing what that technology is. “4610” likely refers to a specific product or component, and its application would depend on its function.

However, I can provide some general examples of how sustainable technologies are applied in various industries, and how a number like “4610” might fit into these scenarios:

General Industrial Applications of Sustainable Technologies:

  • Manufacturing:
    • Energy efficiency: Technologies that reduce energy consumption in factories, such as efficient lighting, heating, and cooling systems, and optimized production processes.
    • Waste reduction: Technologies that minimize waste generation, promote recycling and reuse, and reduce the use of hazardous materials.
    • Water conservation: Technologies that reduce water consumption in industrial processes, such as water recycling and treatment systems.
    • Sustainable materials: Using renewable and recycled materials in manufacturing processes.
  • Energy:
    • Renewable energy sources: Implementing solar, wind, hydro, and other renewable energy technologies to reduce reliance on fossil fuels.
    • Smart grids: Using technology to optimize energy distribution and reduce waste.
    • Energy storage: Developing advanced battery and other energy storage solutions to improve the reliability and efficiency of renewable energy systems.
  • Transportation:
    • Electric vehicles: Transitioning to electric or hybrid vehicles in industrial fleets and logistics operations.
    • Fuel efficiency: Implementing technologies to improve fuel efficiency in trucks, ships, and other transportation modes.
    • Alternative fuels: Using biofuels and other alternative fuels to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Agriculture:
    • Precision agriculture: Using technology to optimize resource use in farming, such as water, fertilizers, and pesticides.
    • Sustainable farming practices: Implementing practices that reduce soil erosion, conserve water, and promote biodiversity.
    • Renewable energy in agriculture: Using solar and wind power to run farm equipment and irrigation systems.
  • Construction:
    • Green building materials: Using sustainable and recycled materials in construction projects.
    • Energy-efficient buildings: Designing and constructing buildings that minimize energy consumption.
    • Waste management in construction: Reducing waste generation and promoting recycling on construction sites.

How “4610” Might Fit In:

  • Specific Product/Component: If “4610” refers to a specific product, its industrial application would depend on its function. For example:
    • Sensor or monitoring device: It could be used in a manufacturing setting to monitor energy consumption or waste generation.
    • Component in a renewable energy system: It could be a part of a solar panel, wind turbine, or other renewable energy technology.
    • Material or chemical: It could be a sustainable material used in manufacturing or a chemical used in a more environmentally friendly industrial process.
  • Standard/Specification: If “4610” refers to a standard, its application would be related to compliance with that standard in a specific industry.

To get a more precise answer about the industrial applications of a sustainable technology related to “4610,” please provide more information about:

  • The specific sustainable technology you’re interested in.
  • Where you encountered the number “4610.”
  • Any context about the situation or application.

With more information, I can offer a more tailored response.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4610 ?

You’re right to ask about research and development (R&D) in sustainable technology! It’s a critical area, as innovation is essential for creating the solutions we need for a sustainable future.

However, just like with the other aspects we’ve discussed, it’s difficult to pinpoint specific R&D related to “4610” without knowing what that refers to. “4610” is likely an identifier, not the technology itself.

General Areas of R&D in Sustainable Technology:

Here are some key areas where significant R&D efforts are focused:

  • Renewable Energy:
    • Improving the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of solar, wind, hydro, and other renewable energy technologies.
    • Developing advanced energy storage solutions (batteries, pumped hydro, etc.) to address the intermittency of renewable sources.
    • Researching new materials and designs for solar panels, wind turbines, and other energy generation devices.
  • Energy Efficiency:
    • Developing new materials and technologies for energy-efficient buildings, appliances, and industrial processes.
    • Creating smart grids and energy management systems to optimize energy distribution and reduce waste.
    • Researching ways to reduce energy consumption in transportation, manufacturing, and other sectors.
  • Sustainable Materials:
    • Developing new bio-based and biodegradable materials to replace traditional plastics and other unsustainable materials.
    • Researching ways to recycle and reuse materials more effectively, promoting a circular economy.
    • Creating new materials with improved properties for use in sustainable technologies (e.g., lightweight, strong materials for wind turbines).
  • Waste Management:
    • Developing new technologies for waste-to-energy conversion, composting, and other waste treatment methods.
    • Researching ways to reduce waste generation and promote recycling and reuse.
    • Creating new biodegradable and compostable packaging materials.
  • Water Conservation:
    • Developing new water purification and desalination technologies.
    • Researching ways to reduce water consumption in agriculture, industry, and households.
    • Creating new water-efficient irrigation systems and other technologies.
  • Sustainable Agriculture:
    • Developing new precision agriculture technologies to optimize resource use in farming.
    • Researching ways to improve soil health and reduce the use of fertilizers and pesticides.
    • Creating new sustainable farming practices that promote biodiversity and reduce environmental impact.

How “4610” Might Be Related:

  • Component or Material: If “4610” refers to a specific component or material, R&D might be focused on improving its performance, durability, or sustainability. For example, if it’s a component in a solar panel, researchers might be working on making it more efficient or using more sustainable materials.
  • Part of a System: If “4610” is part of a larger sustainable technology system, R&D might be focused on integrating it with other components or optimizing its performance within the system.

To find specific R&D efforts related to a sustainable technology, you can:

  • Search for research papers and publications: Use academic databases and search engines to find research on specific sustainable technology topics.
  • Look at university and research institution websites: Many universities and research institutions conduct research on sustainable technologies.
  • Check industry websites and publications: Industry associations and companies involved in sustainable technology often publish information about their R&D efforts.

If you can provide more context about the type of sustainable technology you’re interested in, I can help you find relevant research and development information.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
  53. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
  77. ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
  96. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
  107. ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

Recommended HashTags

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »