Sustainable technology of 4600

It seems like you might be asking about two different things:

1. Armstrong 4600 Pumps: These are industrial pumps designed to be efficient and have a long lifespan, which contributes to sustainability by reducing energy consumption and the need for frequent replacements.
2. UL 4600 Standard: This is a safety standard specifically for evaluating autonomous products, including autonomous vehicles. It focuses on ensuring the safety of these products through rigorous testing and assessment.

If you could clarify which one you’re interested in, or if you have a different question altogether, I’d be happy to provide more information.

What is Sustainable technology of 4600 ?

Unfortunately, without more context, it’s difficult to pinpoint the exact “sustainable technology of 4600” you’re interested in. The number 4600 could refer to various things, and sustainable technology is a broad field.

However, I can offer some potential interpretations and examples:

1. If 4600 refers to a specific product or model number:

• Industrial equipment: Some industrial equipment, like pumps (as mentioned before with Armstrong 4600 pumps), are designed with sustainability in mind. This could involve energy efficiency, durable materials, and reduced waste. If you have a specific product in mind, you can search for its sustainability features.
• Electronics: Some electronics might have model numbers in the 4600 range. Manufacturers are increasingly focusing on sustainable practices in electronics, such as using recycled materials, reducing energy consumption, and designing for recyclability.

2. If 4600 refers to a standard or regulation:

• UL 4600: As previously mentioned, this is a safety standard for autonomous products. Safety is a crucial aspect of sustainability, as it ensures that technologies don’t pose risks to people or the environment.
• Other standards: There might be other standards or regulations related to specific industries or technologies that involve the number 4600. These could include guidelines for environmental impact, energy efficiency, or resource usage.

3. If 4600 is a more abstract reference:

• Year 4600: While this is far in the future, it’s possible to speculate about sustainable technologies that might exist then. These could involve advanced energy sources, closed-loop systems for resource management, or technologies that integrate seamlessly with natural ecosystems.
• Symbolic number: The number 4600 might have a symbolic meaning in a specific context. It could represent a goal, a target, or a milestone related to sustainability.

To help me understand your question better, could you please provide more information about the context? For example:

• What kind of technology are you interested in?
• Where did you encounter this reference to “4600”?
• What aspects of sustainability are most important to you (e.g., energy efficiency, waste reduction, environmental protection)?

With more information, I can provide a more relevant and specific answer.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4600 ?

It seems you’re still interested in the “sustainable technology of 4600.” Since the number 4600 could refer to different things, let’s explore who might be involved with sustainable technology related to each possibility:

1. If 4600 refers to a specific product or model number (e.g., Armstrong 4600 pumps):

• Manufacturers: Companies like Armstrong Fluid Technology, who produce the 4600 pumps, are responsible for designing and manufacturing sustainable products. This includes using energy-efficient designs, durable materials, and minimizing waste during production.
• Customers: Businesses and individuals who purchase and use these products are also involved. They can choose to buy sustainable options, maintain them properly to prolong their lifespan, and dispose of them responsibly.
• Engineers and designers: Professionals who design and specify these products play a role in incorporating sustainable features. They can select materials with lower environmental impact, optimize designs for energy efficiency, and consider the product’s entire lifecycle.

2. If 4600 refers to a standard or regulation (e.g., UL 4600):

• Standards organizations: Organizations like UL (Underwriters Laboratories) develop and maintain standards like UL 4600. They bring together experts from various fields to create guidelines that ensure safety and sustainability.
• Manufacturers: Companies that produce autonomous products need to comply with standards like UL 4600. They must design and test their products to meet the safety requirements outlined in the standard.
• Consumers: Ultimately, consumers benefit from standards like UL 4600 as they provide assurance that autonomous products are safe and reliable.

3. If 4600 is a more abstract reference:

• Researchers and innovators: Scientists, engineers, and entrepreneurs who develop new sustainable technologies are crucial. They explore new materials, energy sources, and processes that can help us achieve a more sustainable future.
• Policymakers: Governments and regulatory bodies play a role in creating policies that encourage sustainable practices. This can include incentives for adopting sustainable technologies, regulations to limit pollution, and support for research and development.
• Individuals: Everyone has a role to play in promoting sustainable technology. By making conscious choices in our daily lives, such as conserving energy, reducing waste, and supporting sustainable businesses, we can contribute to a more sustainable future.

In general, the development and adoption of sustainable technology involve a wide range of stakeholders, including:

• Businesses: Companies across various industries are increasingly recognizing the importance of sustainability. They are investing in sustainable technologies to reduce their environmental impact, improve efficiency, and meet growing consumer demand for eco-friendly products.
• Governments: Governments at all levels are implementing policies and regulations to promote sustainable technology. This includes investing in research and development, providing incentives for businesses to adopt sustainable practices, and setting standards for environmental performance.
• Consumers: Consumers are becoming more aware of the environmental and social impacts of their choices. They are increasingly demanding sustainable products and services, which is driving businesses to adopt more sustainable practices.
• Researchers and academics: Scientists and engineers play a crucial role in developing new sustainable technologies. They conduct research, develop new materials and processes, and provide expertise to businesses and governments.
• Non-governmental organizations (NGOs): NGOs advocate for environmental protection and promote sustainable practices. They work with businesses, governments, and communities to raise awareness about sustainability issues and encourage the adoption of sustainable technologies.

It’s important to remember that sustainability is a shared responsibility. By working together, we can create a future where technology and innovation contribute to a healthy planet and a thriving society.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4600 ?

It’s tricky to give a precise “when” for the need for “sustainable technology of 4600” without knowing exactly what 4600 refers to. However, I can offer some general contexts and timelines based on the possibilities:

1. If 4600 refers to a specific product or model number (e.g., Armstrong 4600 pumps):

• Now: The need for sustainable technology in this context is immediate. Companies are already designing and manufacturing more sustainable versions of existing products, and customers are increasingly seeking these options.
• Ongoing: As technology advances and sustainability concerns grow, the need for sustainable products like these will only increase in the future.

2. If 4600 refers to a standard or regulation (e.g., UL 4600):

• Now: Standards like UL 4600 are relevant from the moment autonomous products are being developed. They provide a framework for ensuring safety and can also incorporate sustainability considerations.
• Future: As autonomous technology evolves and becomes more widespread, the need for standards like UL 4600 will remain crucial. These standards may also need to adapt to address new sustainability challenges.

3. If 4600 is a more abstract reference:

• Past, present, and future: The need for sustainable technology in a broader sense has existed for a long time, as we’ve become more aware of the environmental impact of human activities. It’s crucial now as we face pressing challenges like climate change, and it will be even more critical in the future as we strive to create a sustainable world for generations to come.

Specific examples related to time:

• UL 4600 Edition 3: This standard was updated in March 2023 to include requirements for autonomous trucking, reflecting the growing importance of this technology.
• Renewable energy targets: Many countries have set targets for increasing the share of renewable energy in their energy mix. For example, India aims to achieve 450 GW of renewable energy capacity by 2030. This highlights the urgent need for sustainable energy technologies.  

In conclusion:

The need for sustainable technology is not limited to a specific time. It’s an ongoing and evolving need that spans across different industries, technologies, and timeframes. Whether it’s related to specific products, safety standards, or broader sustainability goals, the development and adoption of sustainable technology are crucial for our present and future.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4600 ?

Again, without knowing specifically what “4600” refers to, it’s hard to be precise. However, I can give you some general areas where sustainable technology is needed, and you can consider if your “4600” fits within these:

1. If 4600 refers to a specific product or model number (e.g., a pump, a piece of equipment):

• Industry: Sustainable versions of these products are needed in the specific industries where they are used. This could be manufacturing, construction, agriculture, or any other sector.
• Supply chains: Sustainability is needed throughout the supply chain, from the sourcing of raw materials to the manufacturing, transportation, and end-of-life management of the product.

2. If 4600 refers to a standard or regulation (e.g., UL 4600):

• Autonomous systems: Standards like UL 4600 are specifically needed in the development and deployment of autonomous systems, including self-driving cars, drones, and other robotic systems. This applies wherever these systems are used: transportation, logistics, delivery, etc.

3. If 4600 is a more abstract reference, or if we consider sustainable technology in general:

• Everywhere! Sustainability is not limited to specific locations. The need for sustainable technology exists globally, although it might be more urgent in some regions than others.

Here are some broader areas where sustainable technology is crucial:

• Energy: Renewable energy technologies like solar, wind, and hydro are needed to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and mitigate climate change. This applies everywhere energy is used: homes, businesses, transportation, industry.
• Transportation: Electric vehicles, fuel-efficient engines, and sustainable transportation infrastructure are needed to reduce emissions and improve air quality in cities and towns worldwide.
• Agriculture: Sustainable agriculture practices are needed to produce food in a way that minimizes environmental impact, conserves resources, and ensures food security.
• Manufacturing: Sustainable manufacturing processes are needed to reduce waste, conserve energy, and minimize pollution. This applies to all manufacturing sectors.
• Buildings: Green building technologies and practices are needed to create energy-efficient and environmentally friendly buildings. This applies to residential, commercial, and industrial buildings.
• Water management: Sustainable water management technologies are needed to conserve water resources, reduce water pollution, and ensure access to clean water for all.
• Waste management: Sustainable waste management technologies are needed to reduce waste generation, increase recycling rates, and minimize the environmental impact of landfills.

In short, the need for sustainable technology is universal. It’s required in every sector, in every country, and at every level of society. If you can tell me more about what “4600” means, I can offer a more tailored response.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4600 ?

It seems you’re asking about the methods or approaches needed to implement sustainable technology, particularly in relation to the “4600” context you’ve been mentioning. While I still don’t know exactly what 4600 refers to, I can provide some general ways sustainable technology is implemented.

1. If 4600 refers to a specific product or model number:

• Design for sustainability: Manufacturers can incorporate sustainable features into the design of their products. This might involve using recycled or renewable materials, designing for energy efficiency, or minimizing waste during production.
• Lifecycle assessment: Companies can evaluate the environmental impact of their products throughout their entire lifecycle, from raw material extraction to end-of-life disposal. This helps identify areas for improvement and guide the development of more sustainable products.
• Sustainable manufacturing processes: Companies can adopt manufacturing processes that reduce energy consumption, minimize waste, and prevent pollution. This might involve using renewable energy sources, implementing closed-loop systems for resource management, or adopting lean manufacturing principles.

2. If 4600 refers to a standard or regulation (e.g., UL 4600):

• Compliance with standards: Companies developing autonomous products need to adhere to relevant safety and sustainability standards. This involves conducting rigorous testing and assessment to ensure that their products meet the required criteria.
• Certification and labeling: Companies can obtain certifications and labels from reputable organizations to demonstrate the sustainability of their products. This can help consumers identify and choose sustainable options.

3. If 4600 is a more abstract reference, or if we consider sustainable technology in general:

• Research and development: Investing in research and development is crucial for developing new sustainable technologies. This includes exploring new materials, energy sources, and processes that can help us achieve a more sustainable future.
• Policy and regulation: Governments can play a role in promoting sustainable technology through policies and regulations. This might involve providing incentives for adopting sustainable practices, setting standards for environmental performance, or investing in research and development.
• Education and awareness: Raising awareness about the importance of sustainability and the benefits of sustainable technology is crucial. This can help drive demand for sustainable products and encourage individuals and organizations to adopt sustainable practices.
• Collaboration and partnerships: Collaboration between businesses, governments, researchers, and NGOs is essential for accelerating the development and adoption of sustainable technology. This can involve sharing knowledge, resources, and expertise to address sustainability challenges.

General approaches to implementing sustainable technology:

• Focus on efficiency: Improving energy efficiency and resource utilization is a key aspect of sustainable technology. This can involve optimizing processes, reducing waste, and using resources more effectively.
• Embrace circular economy principles: The circular economy emphasizes reducing waste by reusing, repairing, and recycling materials and products. Sustainable technology can play a role in enabling circular economy practices.
• Consider the social dimension: Sustainability is not just about environmental protection. It also involves social equity and justice. Sustainable technology should be developed and implemented in a way that benefits all members of society.
• Take a holistic approach: Sustainable technology should be integrated into all aspects of our lives, from the products we use to the infrastructure we rely on. This requires a holistic approach that considers the interconnectedness of environmental, social, and economic systems.

By adopting these approaches, we can effectively implement sustainable technology and create a more sustainable future for all.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4600 ?

It’s difficult to say definitively whether a case study exists for “sustainable technology of 4600” without knowing what 4600 refers to. However, I can provide some examples of case studies related to sustainable technology in general, which might be helpful depending on your specific interest.

1. Case studies related to specific products or technologies:

• Case study on the implementation of energy-efficient pumps in a manufacturing facility: This could examine how a company reduced its energy consumption and costs by switching to more sustainable pumps, potentially including models with features like those in the Armstrong 4600 series.
• Case study on the use of recycled materials in electronics manufacturing: This could explore how a company successfully incorporated recycled plastics or metals into its products, reducing its reliance on virgin materials and minimizing waste.
• Case study on the development and deployment of a solar-powered irrigation system in a rural community: This could analyze how a sustainable technology helped improve agricultural productivity and livelihoods in a region with limited access to electricity.

2. Case studies related to standards or regulations:

• Case study on the impact of UL 4600 on the safety and development of autonomous vehicles: This could investigate how the standard has influenced the design and testing of self-driving cars, ensuring their safety and promoting public trust in this technology.
• Case study on the implementation of a government policy promoting renewable energy adoption: This could examine how a specific policy, such as feed-in tariffs or tax incentives, has affected the growth of the renewable energy sector in a particular region or country.

3. Case studies related to broader sustainability initiatives:

• Case study on a city’s efforts to become carbon neutral: This could analyze the various strategies and technologies employed by a city to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions, such as investing in renewable energy, improving public transportation, and promoting energy efficiency in buildings.
• Case study on a company’s transition to a circular economy model: This could explore how a company redesigned its products and processes to minimize waste, reuse materials, and recycle products at the end of their life cycle.
• Case study on a community-based initiative to promote sustainable agriculture: This could examine how a group of farmers and community members worked together to adopt sustainable farming practices, improve soil health, and reduce their reliance on chemical inputs.

Where to find case studies:

• Academic databases: JSTOR, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar are good resources for finding academic case studies on sustainable technology.
• Industry publications: Many industry-specific magazines and websites publish case studies on sustainable practices and technologies relevant to their sectors.
• Sustainability reports: Companies often publish sustainability reports that include case studies on their own initiatives and achievements in sustainable technology.
• Government websites: Government agencies and organizations involved in environmental protection and sustainable development often publish case studies on their programs and policies.
• NGO websites: Non-governmental organizations working on sustainability issues often publish case studies on their projects and initiatives.

If you can provide more context about what “4600” refers to, I might be able to find more specific case studies related to your interest.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4600 ?

I understand you’re looking for a white paper on “Sustainable technology of 4600.” Unfortunately, without knowing what “4600” refers to, I can’t directly find a specific white paper. “4600” could be a model number, a code, or something else entirely.

However, I can offer some guidance on how to find relevant white papers, and I can give you examples of the types of white papers that might exist depending on what “4600” represents.

Here’s how you can search for white papers:

1. Be Specific: The more details you have about “4600,” the better. Is it a product? A standard? A project? If you know the company or organization associated with it, include that in your search.
2. Use Search Engines Effectively: Use targeted keywords. For example, if “4600” is a pump, try searches like:
   • “Sustainable pumps white paper”
   • “Energy efficient pump technology white paper”
   • “[Manufacturer Name] 4600 pump sustainability”
3. Check Industry Websites: If you suspect “4600” is related to a specific industry (e.g., manufacturing, automotive, etc.), look at the websites of trade associations, industry publications, and relevant companies.
4. Look at Standards Organizations: If “4600” is a standard (like UL 4600 for autonomous vehicles), check the website of the standards organization (e.g., UL).
5. Search Academic Databases: If you’re looking for research-heavy white papers, try academic databases like JSTOR, IEEE Xplore, or ScienceDirect.

Examples of the types of white papers you might find (depending on what “4600” is):

• Product-Specific White Paper: If “4600” is a product (like a pump, motor, or sensor), a white paper might discuss its sustainable features, energy efficiency, lifecycle analysis, and how it contributes to a greener operation. It might be published by the manufacturer.
• Technology-Focused White Paper: If “4600” refers to a broader technology (like a type of manufacturing process or a new material), a white paper could explore the sustainability challenges and opportunities associated with that technology. It might be published by a research institution, consulting firm, or industry consortium.
• Policy or Regulation White Paper: If “4600” relates to a standard or regulation, a white paper might analyze the impact of that standard on sustainability, discuss best practices for compliance, or propose recommendations for future development. It could be published by a government agency, NGO, or standards organization.
• Case Study White Paper: This type of white paper would present a real-world example of how a particular sustainable technology (related to “4600”) was implemented, the challenges faced, and the results achieved. It might be published by the organization that conducted the case study.

If you can provide more information about “4600,” I can assist you further in finding relevant white papers.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4600 ?

While I still need more information about what “4600” represents to give you the most specific examples, I can outline some general industrial applications of sustainable technology. These might give you some ideas depending on what kind of technology “4600” is.

General Industrial Applications of Sustainable Technology:

• Energy Efficiency:
  • Waste heat recovery: Capturing and reusing heat generated by industrial processes to reduce energy consumption.
  • Smart grids: Implementing intelligent systems to optimize energy distribution and reduce losses.
  • Energy-efficient machinery: Using equipment designed to minimize energy consumption, such as variable speed drives for motors.
• Resource Conservation:
  • Water recycling: Treating and reusing wastewater in industrial processes to reduce water consumption.
  • Closed-loop systems: Designing production systems that minimize waste and maximize resource utilization.
  • Sustainable materials: Using recycled, renewable, or biodegradable materials in manufacturing.
• Pollution Reduction:
  • Emissions control: Implementing technologies to reduce air and water pollution from industrial facilities.
  • Waste treatment: Treating industrial waste to remove pollutants and make it safe for disposal or reuse.
  • Green chemistry: Designing chemical processes that minimize the use of hazardous substances and reduce environmental impact.
• Process Optimization:
  • Lean manufacturing: Implementing lean principles to reduce waste, improve efficiency, and minimize environmental impact.
  • Industrial symbiosis: Creating networks of companies that can use each other’s byproducts as resources, reducing waste and promoting resource efficiency.
  • Life cycle assessment: Evaluating the environmental impact of products and processes throughout their entire lifecycle to identify areas for improvement.

Examples of Specific Industrial Applications:

• Renewable energy integration: Industries can use solar, wind, or other renewable energy sources to power their operations, reducing their reliance on fossil fuels.
• Sustainable supply chains: Companies can work with their suppliers to adopt sustainable practices, ensuring that materials and products are sourced responsibly.
• Green building design: Industrial facilities can be designed and constructed to meet green building standards, reducing their environmental impact.
• Circular economy in manufacturing: Industries can implement circular economy principles by designing products for disassembly and reuse, and by recycling materials and components.

If “4600” refers to something specific, here are some potential applications:

• If “4600” is a type of pump: It could be used in various industries for fluid transfer, with a focus on energy efficiency and reduced water consumption.
• If “4600” is a material: It might be used in manufacturing to create more sustainable products with a lower environmental impact.
• If “4600” is a process: It could be applied in industries to reduce waste, improve efficiency, or minimize pollution.

To give you more tailored examples, please provide more information about what “4600” represents.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4600 ?

You’re interested in the research and development (R&D) behind “sustainable technology of 4600.” That’s a great question, as R&D is crucial for advancing sustainability!

Since I still don’t have the context of what “4600” is, I’ll provide some general areas of R&D in sustainable technology, and then give some examples that might be relevant depending on what “4600” refers to.

General Areas of R&D in Sustainable Technology:

• New Materials:
  • Developing biodegradable plastics from renewable resources.
  • Creating lightweight, high-strength materials for transportation to reduce fuel consumption.
  • Researching and developing new types of solar cell materials for more efficient energy conversion.
• Energy Technologies:
  • Improving the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of solar, wind, and other renewable energy technologies.
  • Developing advanced energy storage solutions, such as batteries and fuel cells.
  • Researching new energy sources, such as geothermal and ocean energy.
• Manufacturing Processes:
  • Developing more sustainable manufacturing processes that reduce waste, energy consumption, and pollution.
  • Researching and implementing circular economy principles in manufacturing.
  • Developing new techniques for recycling and reusing materials.
• Environmental Remediation:
  • Developing technologies for cleaning up contaminated sites and restoring ecosystems.
  • Researching new methods for removing pollutants from air and water.
  • Developing technologies for carbon capture and storage.
• Agriculture and Food Systems:
  • Researching sustainable agriculture practices that reduce environmental impact and improve food security.
  • Developing new technologies for precision agriculture, such as sensors and drones.
  • Researching and developing sustainable food packaging and processing technologies.

Examples of R&D that might be relevant depending on “4600”:

• If “4600” is a product (e.g., a pump):
  • R&D could focus on improving the energy efficiency of the pump. This might involve researching new pump designs, developing more efficient motors, or using advanced materials to reduce friction.
  • R&D could also explore ways to make the pump more durable and reliable, extending its lifespan and reducing the need for replacements.
• If “4600” is a standard (e.g., UL 4600):
  • R&D could focus on developing new testing methods and criteria for evaluating the sustainability of autonomous products.
  • R&D could also explore how to incorporate sustainability considerations into the design and development of autonomous systems.
• If “4600” is a broader technology or concept:
  • R&D could focus on developing new applications for that technology that promote sustainability.
  • R&D could also explore how to overcome challenges and limitations associated with that technology to make it more sustainable.

Where R&D happens:

• Universities: Universities are centers of research and innovation, and many conduct research on sustainable technology.
• Government labs: Government agencies often have research labs dedicated to sustainable technology development.
• Private companies: Many companies invest in R&D to develop new sustainable products and processes.
• Non-profit organizations: Some non-profit organizations conduct research and development on sustainable technology, often focusing on specific issues or communities.

To help me give you more specific examples of R&D related to “4600,” please provide more context about what it refers to.

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

References

1. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r} Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
2. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
3. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
4. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
5. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u} Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
6. ^ Jump up to:^a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
8. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
10. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
11. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
12. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
16. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
17. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
18. ^ Jump up to:^a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
20. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
21. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
22. ^ Jump up to:^a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
23. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i} Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
24. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
27. ^ Jump up to:^a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
39. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
40. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
41. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
43. ^ Jump up to:^a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
44. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
49. ^ Jump up to:^a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
51. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
53. ^ Jump up to:^a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
67. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
72. ^ Jump up to:^a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
77. ^ Jump up to:^a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
79. ^ Jump up to:^a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
80. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
85. ^ Jump up to:^a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
89. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
92. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
96. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
97. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
103. ^ Jump up to:^a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
107. ^ Jump up to:^a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

• #blogpost
• #bloggerstyle
• #style
• #follow
• #like
• #food
• #bloggers
• #music
• #fashionblogger
• #art
• #bloggerlife
• #photooftheday
• #life
• #beauty
• #influencer
• #instadaily
• #instablog
• #makeup
• #foodblogger