Sustainable technology of 4590

Sustainable technology of 4590 ?

The query “sustainable technology of 4590” is ambiguous because it is unclear what “4590” refers to. It could potentially refer to:

1. A specific product or model number: In this case, more context is needed to identify the product and determine its sustainability aspects.
2. A year: While it could refer to the past, it’s more likely that the user is interested in sustainable technologies relevant to the present or near future.

To provide a relevant answer, I will address both possibilities:

If “4590” refers to a product or model number:

Please provide more information about the product or model number you are interested in. This will allow me to identify the specific technology and assess its sustainability aspects.

If “4590” refers to the year 4590:

It is difficult to predict the exact state of technology in the year 4590. However, based on current trends and advancements, we can speculate on some potential sustainable technologies:

• Advanced energy generation and storage: Technologies like fusion power, advanced solar energy, and highly efficient energy storage systems could be prevalent.
• Closed-loop resource systems: Technologies that enable the complete recycling and reuse of resources, minimizing waste and pollution, could be widespread.
• Biotechnology and biomimicry: Technologies inspired by nature could be used to create sustainable materials, products, and processes.
• Artificial intelligence and automation: AI and automation could optimize resource usage, improve efficiency, and reduce environmental impact.

It is important to note that these are just speculations, and the actual sustainable technologies in 4590 could be very different. The development of sustainable technologies is an ongoing process, and it is crucial to continue investing in research and innovation to create a sustainable future.

In conclusion, to provide a more specific answer to your query, please clarify what “4590” refers to.

What is Sustainable technology of 4590 ?

It seems you’re interested in what sustainable technology might look like in the distant future! It’s fun to speculate. Here’s a breakdown of some possibilities for sustainable technology in 4590, keeping in mind that this is imaginative forecasting:

Core Principles:

• Radical Efficiency: By 4590, resource scarcity and environmental pressures would likely necessitate extreme efficiency in everything. Think minimal energy waste, closed-loop systems for materials, and hyper-optimized processes.
• Symbiotic Technology: Technologies might be designed to work in harmony with natural ecosystems, perhaps even mimicking biological processes for energy generation, material creation, or waste management.
• Localized and Adaptive Systems: Large, centralized systems might be replaced by smaller, adaptable technologies tailored to specific environments and needs. This could mean highly localized energy grids, personalized manufacturing, and agriculture that works in sync with local ecosystems.

Possible Technologies:

• Advanced Energy:
  • Fusion Power: If we crack fusion, it could provide clean, abundant energy.
  • Space-Based Solar: Harnessing solar energy from space, where it’s more consistent, and beaming it down to Earth.
  • Ambient Energy Harvesting: Technologies that capture energy from the environment (vibrations, heat, etc.) at a very small scale but are ubiquitous and interconnected.
• Material Science:
  • Bio-Integrated Materials: Materials grown or designed to seamlessly integrate with living systems, perhaps for construction, manufacturing, or even medicine.
  • Smart Matter: Materials that can change their properties on demand, allowing for dynamic adaptation and resource optimization.
  • Upcycling and Reintegration: Technologies that can break down any material into its basic components and reuse them indefinitely, eliminating waste.
• Information and Automation:
  • AI-Driven Optimization: AI systems that manage resources, infrastructure, and even individual needs with the goal of maximizing sustainability.
  • Decentralized Networks: Hyper-local networks that allow for the sharing of resources, information, and energy within communities, reducing reliance on large, centralized systems.
• Agriculture and Food:
  • Vertical and Indoor Farming: Highly efficient, controlled environment agriculture that minimizes land use and resource consumption.
  • Personalized Food Production: Technologies that allow individuals or communities to produce food tailored to their needs and local conditions.

Important Considerations:

• Ethical Implications: With such powerful technologies, ethical considerations would be paramount. How do we ensure equitable access and prevent misuse?
• Resilience: Technologies would need to be resilient to environmental changes and potential disruptions.
• Human-Technology Interface: How would humans interact with these advanced technologies? Would they be seamlessly integrated into our lives?

It’s a fascinating thought experiment! The sustainable technology of 4590 would likely be far beyond what we can easily imagine today. But by thinking about the challenges and possibilities, we can start to lay the groundwork for a more sustainable future.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4590 ?

It’s interesting to think about who might need sustainable technology in 4590! Here are some possibilities:

• Humanity (if still around): If humans still exist in 4590, they would undoubtedly rely on sustainable technologies for survival. Given the potential environmental challenges and resource limitations, sustainable practices would be essential for providing food, water, energy, and shelter.
• Descendants of Humanity: It’s possible that humanity as we know it might evolve or transform into something else. Whatever form they take, they would likely inherit the need for sustainable technologies to maintain their existence and thrive in their environment.
• Other Intelligent Life: If there are other intelligent species on Earth or elsewhere, they might also require sustainable technologies. This could be due to similar environmental concerns or simply as a way to live in harmony with their surroundings.
• AI or Sentient Machines: If artificial intelligence or sentient machines become prevalent, they might also depend on sustainable technologies. They would need energy and resources to function, and it’s conceivable that they would prioritize sustainability to ensure their long-term survival.

Why would they need it?

• Resource Scarcity: Even with advanced technology, resources might still be limited. Sustainable technologies would help ensure efficient use and minimize waste.
• Environmental Preservation: By 4590, environmental damage could be severe. Sustainable technologies would be crucial for restoring ecosystems and preventing further harm.
• Long-term Survival: Whether it’s humans, their descendants, or other intelligent beings, sustainable practices would be essential for ensuring long-term survival and prosperity.

It’s important to remember that this is all speculation. The needs and challenges of those living in 4590 are difficult to predict. However, it’s reasonable to assume that sustainability would be a critical factor for any civilization or entity seeking to thrive in the distant future.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4590 ?

That’s a great question! It’s not just who needs sustainable technology in 4590, but when it will be needed. Here’s a breakdown of the timeline:

• Long before 4590: The need for sustainable technology is already critical today. We are facing challenges like climate change, resource depletion, and pollution. The sooner we develop and implement sustainable solutions, the better the chances for future generations.
• Increasing urgency: As we move closer to 4590, the need for sustainable technology will likely become even more urgent. If we don’t address current environmental problems, they will likely worsen, making sustainable solutions even more crucial for survival.
• By 4590: It’s likely that by the year 4590, sustainable technology will be absolutely essential. If any form of civilization or intelligent life exists, they will likely depend on it for their continued existence.

Why the urgency?

• Cumulative effects: Environmental problems tend to have cumulative effects. The longer we wait to address them, the more severe they become.
• Technological development: Developing truly sustainable technologies takes time. Research, innovation, and implementation all require significant effort.
• Planetary boundaries: There are limits to how much the Earth can handle. We need to act before we exceed those boundaries and cause irreversible damage.

In short: The need for sustainable technology is not something for the future, it’s a pressing concern for the present. The sooner we prioritize sustainability, the better the outlook for 4590 and beyond.

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4590 ?

That’s a good question! While we’re speculating about a distant future, considering where sustainable technology might be needed in 4590 requires thinking big and small. Here are some possibilities:

• Earth (and potentially beyond): Even in 4590, Earth will likely still be a primary location for sustainable technologies. However, the scope could expand:
  • Everywhere on Earth: Sustainable solutions would need to be integrated into every aspect of life, from cities and rural areas to oceans and atmosphere. Localized solutions adapted to specific ecosystems would be crucial.
  • Space: If humanity (or its descendants) has expanded beyond Earth, sustainable technologies would be essential for off-world settlements, space stations, and even interplanetary travel. Resource management in space would be critical.
• Specific Environments:
  • Urban Centers: Highly dense populations would require advanced sustainable solutions for energy, waste management, transportation, and resource allocation.
  • Remote or Harsh Environments: Sustainable technologies would be vital for survival in extreme environments like deserts, polar regions, or deep sea, where resources are limited and conditions are challenging.
  • Restored Ecosystems: Sustainable technologies might be employed to actively manage and maintain restored ecosystems, ensuring their long-term health and resilience.
• Within Technologies Themselves: Sustainable principles might be embedded within the very design of technologies:
  • Materials: Sustainable materials would be used in the construction of everything, from buildings to devices.
  • Energy Systems: Sustainable energy generation and distribution would be integrated into all technological systems.
  • Information Networks: Even information networks could be designed with sustainability in mind, minimizing energy consumption and resource usage.

Thinking even bigger:

• Other Planets/Habitats: If humanity has colonized other planets or created artificial habitats, sustainable technologies would be absolutely essential for long-term survival in these closed-loop systems.
• The Interface Between Natural and Artificial: In 4590, the lines between natural and artificial might be blurred. Sustainable technologies could be used to create seamless integration between human-made systems and natural ecosystems.

Ultimately, “where” sustainable technology is required in 4590 depends on how civilization has evolved and where it exists. However, the core principle remains: sustainability would be essential for survival and prosperity in any location.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4590 ?

It’s fascinating to ponder how sustainable technology might be implemented in 4590! Here are some possibilities, keeping in mind this is imaginative speculation:

1. Integration with Natural Systems:

• Biomimicry: Technologies could be designed to mimic natural processes, like how plants convert sunlight into energy, or how ecosystems recycle nutrients. This could involve creating artificial systems that function like natural ones, or even directly integrating technology with living organisms.
• Symbiotic Technologies: Technologies might be designed to work in close harmony with natural ecosystems, perhaps even enhancing them. For example, energy systems could be designed to provide benefits to local ecosystems, or materials could be grown or designed to seamlessly integrate with living systems.

2. Advanced Material Science:

• Smart Materials: Materials that can change their properties on demand could be crucial for adapting to changing conditions and optimizing resource use. Imagine buildings that can adjust their insulation based on the weather, or materials that can repair themselves.
• Bio-Integrated Materials: Materials grown or designed to seamlessly integrate with living systems could be used for construction, manufacturing, or even medicine. This could involve growing materials with specific properties, or modifying existing materials to work in harmony with living organisms.
• Closed-Loop Material Systems: Technologies that can break down any material into its basic components and reuse them indefinitely would be essential for eliminating waste and conserving resources.

3. Energy and Resource Management:

• Decentralized Energy Systems: Instead of large, centralized power plants, energy could be generated and distributed locally, perhaps through a network of small, highly efficient devices. This could involve harnessing energy from the environment, like solar, wind, or geothermal, or even developing new energy sources we can’t imagine today.
• AI-Driven Optimization: Artificial intelligence could play a crucial role in managing resources and infrastructure. AI systems could monitor energy use, predict demand, and optimize resource allocation to minimize waste and maximize efficiency.
• Personalized Systems: Technologies could be tailored to individual needs and local conditions, allowing for highly efficient resource use. This could involve personalized manufacturing, localized agriculture, and energy systems adapted to specific environments.

4. Social and Ethical Considerations:

• Equitable Access: Ensuring that everyone has access to sustainable technologies would be crucial for social justice and preventing inequality.
• Ethical Development: Developing and implementing sustainable technologies responsibly would require careful consideration of ethical implications, potential risks, and long-term consequences.
• Community Involvement: Engaging communities in the development and implementation of sustainable technologies would be essential for ensuring that solutions are appropriate, effective, and accepted.

It’s important to remember that this is all speculation. The actual implementation of sustainable technology in 4590 could be very different. However, by thinking about the challenges and possibilities, we can start to lay the groundwork for a more sustainable future.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4590 ?

It’s impossible to provide a real case study of sustainable technology in 4590. Case studies analyze existing situations, and we have no access to that future. However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on the speculative technologies we’ve discussed, to illustrate how such technologies might function and interact.

Hypothetical Case Study: The City of Aethel in 4590

Background: Aethel is a coastal city, heavily reliant on the ocean for resources and facing the challenges of rising sea levels. Sustainability is not just a goal, but a necessity for its survival.

Technology Focus: This case study focuses on Aethel’s integrated approach to resource management, showcasing several interconnected sustainable technologies.

1. Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) and Biomimicry:

• Description: Aethel utilizes advanced OTEC plants that not only generate clean energy from the temperature difference between ocean surface and deep waters, but also mimic the natural upwelling process. This brings nutrient-rich water to the surface, supporting thriving aquaculture farms.
• Impact: Clean, abundant energy powers the city. The aquaculture farms provide a sustainable food source, reducing reliance on traditional agriculture and its land/water footprint.

2. Smart Materials and Adaptive Infrastructure:

• Description: Aethel’s buildings are constructed from smart materials that can adapt to changing conditions. They can adjust their shape and insulation to optimize energy efficiency and withstand extreme weather events. The city’s sea walls are also made of these materials, automatically reinforcing themselves during storms.
• Impact: Reduced energy consumption for heating and cooling. Increased resilience to climate change impacts, protecting the city and its inhabitants.

3. Closed-Loop Resource Management:

• Description: Aethel employs advanced recycling and resource recovery systems. Nearly all waste is processed and transformed back into usable materials. Even CO2 captured from the atmosphere is used to create new materials or fuels.
• Impact: Minimal waste generation. Reduced reliance on virgin resources. A circular economy that minimizes environmental impact.

4. AI-Driven Optimization:

• Description: An AI system manages Aethel’s resource flows, optimizing energy distribution, transportation, and waste management. It predicts resource needs, adjusts systems in real-time, and identifies areas for improvement.
• Impact: Increased efficiency and reduced waste across all city systems. Improved quality of life for residents through optimized services.

Challenges and Considerations:

• Initial Investment: Implementing these advanced technologies required significant upfront investment and research.
• Maintenance and Adaptation: Maintaining complex systems and adapting them to evolving needs requires ongoing effort and expertise.
• Social Equity: Ensuring equitable access to the benefits of these technologies for all residents is an ongoing challenge.

Conclusion:

Aethel’s hypothetical example demonstrates how integrated sustainable technologies could enable a city to thrive in a resource-constrained future. While this is a fictional case study, it highlights the potential of advanced technologies to create a more sustainable world. It also emphasizes the importance of considering social, ethical, and economic factors in the development and implementation of sustainable solutions.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4590 ?

White Paper: Envisioning Sustainable Technology in 4590

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 4590. While predicting the future with certainty is impossible, we can extrapolate from current trends and imagine how technological advancements might address the critical challenges of resource scarcity, environmental degradation, and the need for long-term ecological balance. This paper examines potential core principles, technological domains, and societal implications of sustainable technology in this distant future.

1. Introduction:

The concept of sustainability rests on meeting present needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own. In 4590, this principle will likely be more critical than ever. This paper posits that by 4590, sustainable technologies will be deeply integrated into all aspects of life, driven by necessity and a fundamental shift in how humanity (or its successors) interacts with the planet and potentially beyond.

2. Core Principles:

• Radical Efficiency: Resource optimization will be paramount. Technologies will minimize waste, maximize resource utilization, and operate with unprecedented levels of efficiency.
• Ecological Integration: Technology will move beyond simply minimizing harm to actively supporting and enhancing natural ecosystems. Biomimicry and symbiotic technologies will be commonplace.
• Resilience and Adaptability: Systems will be designed to withstand environmental changes, adapt to evolving needs, and self-repair.
• Decentralization and Localization: Large, centralized systems may be replaced by smaller, adaptable technologies tailored to specific environments and needs, fostering resilience and localized resource management.

3. Technological Domains:

• Energy:
  • Fusion Power: Controlled nuclear fusion could provide a clean, abundant energy source.
  • Space-Based Solar: Harnessing solar energy in space and beaming it to Earth could offer a consistent and vast energy supply.
  • Ambient Energy Harvesting: Ubiquitous micro-devices could harvest energy from the environment (vibrations, heat, etc.), powering small-scale systems and contributing to larger networks.
• Materials:
  • Bio-Integrated Materials: Materials grown or designed to seamlessly integrate with living systems, revolutionizing construction and manufacturing.
  • Smart Matter: Materials with programmable properties, enabling dynamic adaptation and resource optimization.
  • Universal Recycling: Technologies capable of breaking down any material into its constituent elements for reuse, creating a truly circular economy.
• Information and Automation:
  • AI-Driven Resource Management: AI systems will optimize resource allocation, predict needs, and manage complex systems for maximum sustainability.
  • Decentralized Networks: Hyperlocal networks will facilitate resource sharing, information exchange, and community-based solutions.
• Food and Agriculture:
  • Vertical and Controlled-Environment Farming: Maximizing food production with minimal land use and resource consumption.
  • Personalized Food Production: Technologies enabling individuals and communities to produce food tailored to their needs and local conditions.

4. Societal Implications:

• Ethical Considerations: Powerful technologies necessitate robust ethical frameworks to ensure equitable access, prevent misuse, and protect the environment.
• Human-Technology Symbiosis: The lines between human and technology may blur, with technologies becoming deeply integrated into daily life.
• Global Cooperation: Addressing global sustainability challenges will require unprecedented levels of international cooperation and shared knowledge.

5. Challenges and Opportunities:

• Technological Development: Achieving the vision outlined in this paper requires significant advancements in numerous scientific and engineering fields.
• Economic Transition: Shifting to a sustainable paradigm will require significant economic changes and investment.
• Social and Cultural Adaptation: Society will need to adapt to new technologies and ways of life.

6. Conclusion:

While the year 4590 remains distant, envisioning its potential landscape of sustainable technology provides a roadmap for present-day action. By prioritizing research, innovation, and ethical considerations, we can begin building the foundation for a future where technology and sustainability are inextricably linked, ensuring a thriving planet for generations to come. This white paper serves as a call to action, urging us to embrace the challenge of creating a truly sustainable future.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4590 ?

It’s fascinating to imagine the industrial applications of sustainable technology in 4590! Here are some possibilities, building on the speculative technologies we’ve discussed:

1. Advanced Manufacturing:

• Closed-Loop Production: Imagine factories where raw materials are endlessly recycled and reused. Advanced material science and nanotechnology could enable the complete breakdown of products into their constituent elements, which are then used to create new products. This would eliminate waste and dramatically reduce the need for resource extraction.
• On-Demand Manufacturing: 3D printing and other advanced manufacturing techniques could allow for the production of goods on demand, minimizing overproduction and waste. Products could be customized to individual needs and manufactured locally, reducing transportation costs and emissions.
• Biomanufacturing: Imagine factories that grow materials or products using biological processes. This could involve using engineered microorganisms to produce plastics, fuels, or even pharmaceuticals. Biomanufacturing could be highly sustainable, as it would rely on renewable resources and could be designed to minimize waste.

2. Energy Production and Distribution:

• Decentralized Energy Grids: Instead of relying on large, centralized power plants, industries could generate their own energy using a combination of renewable sources, such as solar, wind, and geothermal. Smart grids powered by AI could optimize energy distribution and minimize waste.
• Energy-Efficient Processes: Industrial processes could be redesigned to minimize energy consumption. This could involve using advanced materials with low energy requirements, developing new catalysts to improve efficiency, and implementing AI-powered optimization systems.
• Carbon Capture and Utilization: Industries that still produce carbon emissions could capture and utilize them to create new products, such as fuels or building materials. This would help to mitigate climate change and create a circular carbon economy.

3. Resource Management:

• AI-Powered Optimization: AI systems could manage resource flows within factories and across supply chains, optimizing material use, minimizing waste, and identifying opportunities for recycling and reuse.
• Water Management: Industries could implement closed-loop water systems, where water is recycled and reused within the factory. Advanced filtration and purification technologies could ensure that water is used efficiently and sustainably.
• Waste Valorization: Waste would no longer be seen as something to dispose of, but as a valuable resource. Technologies could be developed to transform waste into useful products, such as energy, fuels, or materials.

4. Transportation and Logistics:

• Sustainable Transportation: Industries could rely on electric vehicles powered by renewable energy, or even develop new forms of transportation that are more sustainable. AI-powered logistics systems could optimize routes and minimize fuel consumption.
• Localized Supply Chains: Manufacturing could become more localized, reducing the need for long-distance transportation. This would reduce emissions and support local economies.

5. Environmental Remediation:

• Pollution Removal: Advanced technologies could be used to clean up existing pollution, such as contaminated soil or water. This could involve using bioremediation, nanotechnology, or other innovative approaches.
• Ecosystem Restoration: Industries could play a role in restoring damaged ecosystems, such as forests or wetlands. This could involve using ecological engineering techniques to create self-sustaining ecosystems.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology could be applied in industry in 4590. The possibilities are vast, and the actual applications will depend on the specific challenges and opportunities that arise in the future. However, it’s clear that sustainability will be a critical factor in industrial development, and that advanced technologies will play a key role in creating a more sustainable future.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4590 ?

It’s exciting to think about the research and development that would be necessary to achieve the sustainable technologies of 4590! Here’s a breakdown of potential areas of focus:

1. Fundamental Science:

• New Physics: Exploring and understanding fundamental forces and particles could unlock new energy sources or ways to manipulate matter at the atomic level. This could lead to breakthroughs in energy generation, material science, and even transportation.
• Consciousness and AI: Understanding consciousness could be key to developing truly intelligent and ethical AI systems that can manage complex systems and make decisions with long-term sustainability in mind.
• Complexity Science: Studying complex systems, like ecosystems and the Earth’s climate, could help us better understand how to live in harmony with nature and develop technologies that work in synergy with natural processes.

2. Materials Science:

• Smart Materials: Developing materials that can change their properties on demand would be crucial for creating adaptive infrastructure, self-repairing systems, and optimizing resource use.
• Bio-Integrated Materials: Research into growing or designing materials that seamlessly integrate with living systems could revolutionize manufacturing, construction, and even medicine.
• Universal Recycling: Discovering ways to break down any material into its basic components for reuse would be essential for creating a truly circular economy.

3. Energy Technologies:

• Fusion Power: Continued research into nuclear fusion is critical for achieving a clean, abundant energy source.
• Space-Based Solar: Developing efficient ways to capture and transmit solar energy from space could provide a consistent and vast energy supply.
• Ambient Energy Harvesting: Exploring new ways to capture energy from the environment, such as vibrations, heat, or even radio waves, could lead to ubiquitous energy sources for small-scale systems.

4. Biotechnology and Biomimicry:

• Synthetic Biology: Engineering biological systems to perform specific tasks, such as producing fuels, materials, or even medicines, could revolutionize manufacturing and resource management.
• Biomimicry: Studying and mimicking natural processes could inspire new technologies for energy generation, material creation, and even waste management.

5. Artificial Intelligence and Automation:

• AI for Resource Management: Developing AI systems that can optimize resource allocation, predict needs, and manage complex systems for maximum sustainability would be crucial for efficient resource use.
• Robotics and Automation: Advanced robotics and automation could be used to build and maintain sustainable infrastructure, clean up pollution, and even restore ecosystems.

6. Social and Ethical Research:

• Ethical AI Development: Research into AI ethics is crucial for ensuring that AI systems are developed and used responsibly, with consideration for long-term sustainability and human well-being.
• Social Impact of Technology: Studying the social and cultural impacts of advanced technologies is essential for ensuring that they are implemented in a way that benefits everyone and promotes social equity.

7. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

• Collaboration across Disciplines: Addressing the complex challenges of sustainability will require collaboration across many different scientific and engineering disciplines, as well as the social sciences and humanities.
• Global Research Networks: International collaboration will be essential for sharing knowledge, resources, and expertise to accelerate the development of sustainable technologies.

It’s important to remember that the research and development needed to achieve the sustainable technologies of 4590 is an ongoing process. It will require sustained effort, investment, and collaboration over many generations. However, by focusing on these key areas of research, we can start to lay the groundwork for a more sustainable future.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

References

1. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r} Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
2. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
3. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
4. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
5. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u} Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
6. ^ Jump up to:^a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
8. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
10. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
11. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
12. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
16. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
17. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
18. ^ Jump up to:^a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
20. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
21. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
22. ^ Jump up to:^a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
23. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i} Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
24. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
27. ^ Jump up to:^a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
39. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
40. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
41. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
43. ^ Jump up to:^a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
44. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
49. ^ Jump up to:^a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
51. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
53. ^ Jump up to:^a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
67. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
72. ^ Jump up to:^a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
77. ^ Jump up to:^a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
79. ^ Jump up to:^a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
80. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
85. ^ Jump up to:^a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
89. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
92. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
96. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
97. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
103. ^ Jump up to:^a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
107. ^ Jump up to:^a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

Recommended HashTags

• #blogpost
• #bloggerstyle
• #style
• #follow
• #like
• #food
• #bloggers
• #music
• #fashionblogger
• #art
• #bloggerlife
• #photooftheday
• #life
• #beauty
• #influencer
• #instadaily
• #instablog
• #makeup
• #foodblogger