Sustainable technology of 4550

79 / 100

Sustainable technology of 4550 ?

It seems like you’re interested in the future of sustainable technology! While it’s difficult to predict exactly what technologies will exist in the year 4550, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and advancements.

Here are some potential areas of focus for sustainable technology in the distant future:

Advanced Energy Solutions: Imagine energy sources that are not only renewable but also incredibly efficient and abundant. This could involve harnessing energy from space, developing fusion power, or utilizing entirely new forms of energy that we can’t even conceive of today.
Closed-Loop Systems: In a truly sustainable future, we might see the development of closed-loop systems for resource management. This means that waste is completely eliminated, and all materials are continuously recycled and reused.
Biomimicry: Taking inspiration from nature, we could see the development of technologies that mimic natural processes. This could lead to the creation of self-healing materials, highly efficient transportation systems, and even the ability to grow structures instead of building them.
Artificial Intelligence and Automation: AI could play a crucial role in optimizing resource usage, predicting environmental changes, and managing complex systems. Advanced automation could help us create sustainable manufacturing processes and reduce our reliance on human labor for resource-intensive tasks.
Space Colonization: As Earth’s resources become more limited, space colonization could become a necessity for human survival. Sustainable technologies would be essential for creating self-sustaining colonies on other planets, ensuring the long-term survival of our species.

Of course, these are just a few possibilities. The future of sustainable technology is likely to be filled with surprises and innovations that we can’t even imagine today. But one thing is certain: the need for sustainable solutions will only become more urgent as time goes on.

Do you have any other questions about sustainable technology or the future? I’m always happy to explore these topics further!

What is Sustainable technology of 4550 ?

Sustainable technology in 4550 is a fascinating concept to ponder! While we can’t definitively know what it will look like, we can speculate based on current trends and extrapolate into the future. Here are some potential aspects:

1. Energy:

Ubiquitous Renewable Energy: Imagine energy sources that are not only renewable but also incredibly efficient and abundant. This could involve harnessing energy from space (solar satellites), tapping into geothermal energy on a massive scale, or even utilizing entirely new forms of energy that we can’t even conceive of today (perhaps related to dark matter or zero-point energy).
Fusion Power: Fusion, the process that powers the sun, could become a practical and widespread energy source, providing clean and virtually limitless power.
Decentralized Energy Grids: Energy might be generated and distributed locally, with highly sophisticated microgrids that are resilient and self-healing.

2. Resource Management:

Closed-Loop Systems: Waste as we know it might be a thing of the past. Advanced recycling and material science could allow for the complete reuse of all materials, creating a circular economy where resources are continuously cycled.
Regenerative Agriculture: Food production could be highly advanced, with indoor vertical farms and precision agriculture techniques that maximize yields while minimizing environmental impact.
Resource Extraction from Space: As Earth’s resources dwindle, we might turn to asteroids and other celestial bodies for raw materials, extracted sustainably with minimal disruption to the environment.

3. Technology & Materials:

Biomimicry: Taking inspiration from nature, we could see the development of technologies that mimic natural processes. This could lead to self-healing materials, highly efficient transportation systems (perhaps inspired by bird flight or fish movement), and even the ability to grow structures instead of building them.
Nanotechnology: At the nanoscale, materials could be engineered with incredible precision, leading to lighter, stronger, and more durable products. Nanotechnology could also be used for environmental remediation, such as cleaning up pollution or desalinating water.
Artificial Intelligence and Automation: AI could play a crucial role in optimizing resource usage, predicting environmental changes, and managing complex systems. Advanced automation could help us create sustainable manufacturing processes and reduce our reliance on human labor for resource-intensive tasks.

4. Transportation:

Personalized Air Mobility: Flying cars or other forms of personal air transportation could become commonplace, powered by clean energy and integrated into smart traffic management systems.
Hyperloop Networks: High-speed transportation systems like the Hyperloop could connect cities and regions, reducing travel times and promoting sustainable mobility.
Space Travel: Space colonization could become a necessity for human survival, and sustainable technologies would be essential for creating self-sustaining colonies on other planets.

5. Built Environment:

Self-Sufficient Buildings: Buildings could be designed to generate their own energy, collect and purify water, and even grow food, becoming self-sufficient ecosystems.
Vertical Cities: Dense, multi-layered cities could be built to minimize land use and maximize efficiency, with integrated green spaces and sustainable transportation systems.
Resilient Infrastructure: Infrastructure could be designed to withstand extreme weather events and other environmental challenges, ensuring the long-term sustainability of human settlements.

These are just a few possibilities. The future of sustainable technology is likely to be filled with surprises and innovations that we can’t even imagine today. But one thing is certain: the need for sustainable solutions will only become more urgent as time goes on, and the technologies of 4550 will likely reflect this imperative.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4550 ?

That’s a great question! It helps us understand the purpose and importance of sustainable technology in the distant future.

In the year 4550, it’s likely that everyone would be reliant on and benefit from sustainable technology. Here’s why:

Essential for Survival: By that point, the consequences of unsustainable practices may have become so severe that sustainable technology is no longer a choice, but a necessity for human survival.
Resource Scarcity: Earth’s resources might be significantly depleted, making it crucial to have technologies that enable efficient resource management, recycling, and even extraction from space.
Environmental Challenges: Climate change and other environmental issues could necessitate advanced technologies to mitigate these problems and ensure a habitable planet.
Population Growth: With a potentially larger global population, sustainable technology would be vital for providing enough food, water, energy, and other essential resources for everyone.

Essentially, sustainable technology in 4550 would be the foundation upon which society functions. It would be integrated into every aspect of life, from energy production and transportation to resource management and urban planning.

Here are some specific groups that would particularly rely on sustainable technology:

Future Generations: The very existence of future generations would depend on the sustainable technologies developed and implemented by their ancestors.
Scientists and Engineers: They would be responsible for developing and improving sustainable technologies, pushing the boundaries of innovation to meet the challenges of the future.
Governments and Policymakers: They would play a crucial role in implementing policies and regulations that promote the adoption and use of sustainable technologies.
Individuals and Communities: Everyone would need to embrace sustainable practices in their daily lives, making conscious choices about consumption, transportation, and resource usage.

In essence, sustainable technology in 4550 would be a collective responsibility, requiring the participation and cooperation of all members of society to ensure a thriving and sustainable future.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4550 ?

This is a complex question, as the “when” depends on how we interpret it. Here are a few perspectives:

1. When will we need sustainable technology of 4550?

This is the most critical aspect. The need for those advanced sustainable technologies will likely arise long before 4550. The timeline depends on how quickly we deplete Earth’s resources and the severity of environmental challenges we face. It’s plausible that the need for such advanced solutions could become urgent within the next few centuries, or even sooner.

2. When will we develop sustainable technology of 4550?

This is harder to predict. Technological advancement is exponential, but it’s not always linear. We might see breakthroughs that accelerate the development of these technologies, or we might encounter unforeseen challenges that slow progress. However, it’s safe to say that the development would be an ongoing process, with incremental improvements over time, rather than a sudden arrival in 4550.

3. When will sustainable technology of 4550 become widespread?

Even after these technologies are developed, it would take time for them to become widely adopted. Factors like cost, infrastructure, and social acceptance would play a role. It’s likely that the transition to a truly sustainable future would be a gradual process, spanning generations.

In summary:

The need for sustainable technology of 4550 is likely to arise much sooner than the year 4550.
The development of these technologies would be an ongoing process, starting long before 4550.
The widespread adoption of these technologies would be a gradual process, likely continuing into 4550 and beyond.

Ultimately, the exact timeline is uncertain. But what’s clear is that the journey towards a sustainable future needs to begin now. The choices we make today will determine the kind of world we live in tomorrow, and the technologies that will be necessary for our survival in the distant future.

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4550 ?

The need for the kind of advanced sustainable technology we’re envisioning for 4550 would be global and universal. It wouldn’t be confined to a specific location but rather essential across the entire planet, and potentially even beyond. Here’s a breakdown:

Every Ecosystem: From the deepest oceans to the highest mountains, every ecosystem would rely on sustainable technology for its preservation and balance. This includes technologies for monitoring, restoring, and protecting natural environments.
Every Human Settlement: Cities, towns, and even remote communities would depend on sustainable solutions for energy, water, food, waste management, and infrastructure. Sustainable urban planning and resource management would be crucial everywhere.
Every Industry: All sectors, from manufacturing and agriculture to transportation and communication, would need to operate on sustainable principles. This would require revolutionary changes in production processes, material usage, and waste disposal.
Beyond Earth: If humanity expands beyond Earth, establishing settlements on other planets or celestial bodies, sustainable technologies would be paramount for creating self-sustaining colonies and ensuring long-term survival in new environments. This includes resource extraction from space.
Atmosphere and Oceans: Technologies would be required to maintain and restore the health of the atmosphere and oceans, addressing issues like climate change, pollution, and acidification.

Essentially, the need for advanced sustainable technology in 4550 would be driven by the interconnectedness of global systems and the fundamental requirements for human survival and planetary health. It would be a necessity everywhere, influencing every aspect of life and shaping the very fabric of civilization.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4550 ?

The “how” of requiring sustainable technology in 4550 is a complex interplay of necessity, evolution, and potentially, even adaptation. It’s not just about inventing gadgets; it’s about a fundamental shift in how humanity interacts with the planet and the universe. Here’s a breakdown:

Environmental Imperative: The most significant driver would be the increasing pressure on Earth’s resources and the consequences of unsustainable practices. Climate change, resource depletion, pollution, and biodiversity loss would likely reach critical levels, making sustainable technologies not just desirable, but essential for survival.
Resource Scarcity: As resources become scarcer, the need for efficient resource management, recycling, and alternative sources would become paramount. Technologies that enable closed-loop systems, resource extraction from space, and the use of renewable resources would be crucial.
Population Growth: A larger global population would increase the demand for food, water, energy, and other resources. Sustainable technologies would be necessary to meet these needs without further straining the planet’s capacity.
Technological Evolution: The development of sustainable technologies would be an ongoing process, driven by scientific advancements and innovation. It’s likely that future generations would build upon the technologies we have today, creating even more sophisticated and sustainable solutions.
Societal Shifts: A shift in societal values and priorities would be necessary to embrace and implement sustainable technologies. This could involve changes in consumption patterns, lifestyles, and governance structures. Education and awareness would play a crucial role in fostering a culture of sustainability.
Economic Drivers: As resources become scarcer and environmental challenges become more pressing, sustainable technologies would become increasingly economically viable. This could drive investment and innovation in sustainable solutions.
Planetary Boundaries: The concept of planetary boundaries, which defines the safe operating limits for human activities on Earth, would likely play a significant role. Sustainable technologies would be essential for staying within these boundaries and ensuring the long-term health of the planet.
Adaptation and Resilience: Sustainable technologies would be crucial for adapting to the impacts of climate change and other environmental challenges. This could involve developing resilient infrastructure, creating drought-resistant crops, and implementing early warning systems for natural disasters.
Interconnectedness: The interconnectedness of global systems would necessitate a global approach to sustainability. International cooperation and collaboration would be essential for developing and implementing sustainable technologies on a global scale.
Necessity as the Mother of Invention: Ultimately, the need for sustainable technology in 4550 would be driven by necessity. Faced with existential challenges, humanity would likely innovate and adapt, developing the technologies needed to survive and thrive in a sustainable way.

It’s important to remember that this is a long-term perspective. The transition to a truly sustainable future would be a gradual process, spanning generations. But the seeds of that future are being planted today, with the development of sustainable technologies and the growing awareness of the importance of environmental stewardship.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4550 ?

It’s tricky to create a specific case study for sustainable technology in 4550 because it requires so much speculation! But, we can build a hypothetical scenario based on the trends and possibilities we’ve discussed. Here’s an attempt:

Case Study: The Great Lakes Restoration Project – 4550

Background: By the mid-45th century, centuries of industrial activity and climate change have severely impacted the Great Lakes region. Once a vital freshwater source, the lakes are now plagued by pollution, invasive species, and fluctuating water levels. The once-thriving ecosystem is on the brink of collapse.

The Solution: A massive, multi-faceted restoration project is launched, utilizing a range of advanced sustainable technologies:

Nanotechnology-based Water Purification: Nanobots are deployed to break down pollutants at the molecular level, removing toxins and restoring water quality to pre-industrial levels.
Biomimicry for Ecosystem Restoration: Inspired by the natural filtration systems of wetlands, engineers create artificial wetlands that effectively filter water and provide habitats for native species.
AI-powered Environmental Monitoring: A network of sensors and AI algorithms continuously monitors water quality, biodiversity, and climate patterns, providing real-time data to optimize restoration efforts and predict potential threats.
Advanced Material Science for Infrastructure: Self-healing materials are used to rebuild aging infrastructure, ensuring resilience against extreme weather events and reducing the need for constant repairs.
Closed-loop Resource Management: All waste generated during the restoration process is meticulously recycled and reused, minimizing environmental impact and creating a circular economy within the project.

Outcomes:

Restored Water Quality: The Great Lakes are once again a source of clean, safe drinking water, supporting a thriving ecosystem and human communities.
Revival of Biodiversity: Native species return to the lakes, and the ecosystem regains its balance and resilience.
Sustainable Economy: The restoration project creates new jobs and industries focused on sustainable technologies and environmental management.
Global Model: The Great Lakes Restoration Project becomes a model for similar efforts around the world, demonstrating the power of sustainable technology to heal and protect the planet.

Challenges:

Technological Limitations: Some of the technologies required for the project are still in their early stages of development, requiring significant research and innovation.
Economic Costs: The project requires a massive investment of resources, necessitating international cooperation and innovative financing mechanisms.
Social Acceptance: Some communities may resist the changes required for the project, requiring effective communication and education to build public support.

This hypothetical case study illustrates how a combination of advanced sustainable technologies could be used to address complex environmental challenges in the future. It highlights the potential for human ingenuity to create solutions that not only restore ecosystems but also promote economic development and social well-being.

Of course, this is just one possible scenario. The actual challenges and solutions of 4550 may be very different. But by exploring these possibilities, we can begin to imagine the kind of world we want to create and the technologies that will be necessary to achieve it.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4550 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 4550 – A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 4550, acknowledging the inherent uncertainties of long-term predictions while extrapolating from current trends and foreseeable challenges. It posits that by this distant future, sustainable technologies will be not merely advantageous, but absolutely essential for human survival and the health of the planet. The paper examines key areas of focus, including energy, resource management, technology & materials, transportation, and the built environment, outlining potential advancements and their implications. It concludes by emphasizing the crucial role of present-day actions in shaping the technological landscape of the future.

1. Introduction:

The year 4550 lies centuries in the future, a time horizon difficult to fully comprehend. Yet, considering the long-term consequences of our current actions, it’s vital to envision a sustainable future and the technologies that will enable it. This paper explores the potential characteristics of sustainable technology in 4550, recognizing that this is a speculative endeavor, but one grounded in present-day trends and a deep understanding of the challenges humanity faces.

2. Key Areas of Focus:

2.1 Energy:

Ubiquitous Renewable Energy: Solar energy harvested from space-based platforms, advanced geothermal systems tapping into deep Earth heat, and potentially even harnessing zero-point energy or other currently unknown sources will provide clean, abundant power.
Fusion Power: Controlled nuclear fusion, replicating the energy source of stars, will likely be a cornerstone of energy production, offering a safe and virtually limitless supply.
Decentralized Smart Grids: Highly sophisticated, self-healing microgrids will distribute energy efficiently, minimizing transmission losses and maximizing resilience.

2.2 Resource Management:

Closed-Loop Economies: Waste will be a concept of the past. Advanced material science and recycling technologies will enable the complete reuse of all materials, creating circular economies.
Regenerative Agriculture: Vertical farms, precision agriculture, and lab-grown food will maximize food production with minimal land use and environmental impact.
Space-Based Resource Acquisition: Mining asteroids and other celestial bodies for resources will supplement terrestrial supplies, reducing pressure on Earth’s ecosystems.

2.3 Technology & Materials:

Biomimicry: Inspired by nature, technologies will mimic biological processes, leading to self-healing materials, highly efficient systems, and even the ability to “grow” structures.
Nanotechnology: Manipulating matter at the atomic and molecular level will create materials with unprecedented properties, enabling breakthroughs in various fields.
Artificial Intelligence & Automation: AI will optimize resource usage, manage complex systems, and drive the development of sustainable technologies.

2.4 Transportation:

Personalized Air Mobility: Clean-energy powered personal aircraft will be integrated into smart traffic management systems, revolutionizing urban transportation.
Hyperloop Networks: High-speed, ground-based transportation systems will connect cities and regions, reducing travel times and promoting sustainable mobility.
Space Travel & Colonization: Sustainable space technologies will enable human expansion beyond Earth, ensuring the long-term survival of our species.

2.5 Built Environment:

Self-Sufficient Buildings: Buildings will generate their own energy, manage their own water, and even grow food, becoming self-contained ecosystems.
Vertical Cities: Dense, multi-layered urban centers will minimize land use and maximize efficiency, integrating green spaces and sustainable transportation.
Resilient Infrastructure: Infrastructure will be designed to withstand extreme weather events and other environmental challenges, ensuring long-term sustainability.

3. Challenges and Considerations:

Technological Development: Achieving these advancements will require sustained research, innovation, and collaboration across disciplines.
Economic Viability: Making sustainable technologies affordable and accessible will be crucial for widespread adoption.
Social Acceptance: Shifts in societal values and behaviors will be necessary to embrace sustainable practices.
Ethical Considerations: The use of advanced technologies like AI and nanotechnology will raise ethical questions that must be carefully addressed.

4. Conclusion:

The vision of sustainable technology in 4550 presented in this white paper is ambitious, but not unrealistic. The challenges we face today – climate change, resource depletion, and environmental degradation – demand that we strive for a future where technology serves as a tool for healing and preserving our planet. The choices we make today, the investments we prioritize, and the values we instill will determine whether this vision becomes a reality. It is our responsibility to lay the foundation for a sustainable future, ensuring that generations to come inherit a thriving planet.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4550 ?

You’re thinking ahead! It’s fascinating to imagine how sustainable technology might revolutionize industries in 4550. Here are some potential industrial applications, keeping in mind that these are extrapolations from current trends:

1. Manufacturing:

Closed-loop Production Systems: Factories of the future might operate on closed-loop principles, where all waste is recycled and reused within the production process. This would drastically reduce resource consumption and minimize environmental impact.
Biomanufacturing: Imagine factories that “grow” products using biological processes, similar to how nature creates materials like wood or silk. This could lead to the production of sustainable materials, pharmaceuticals, and even complex electronic devices.
AI-Optimized Production: Artificial intelligence could manage and optimize entire manufacturing processes, from resource allocation to energy consumption, ensuring maximum efficiency and sustainability.

2. Agriculture:

Vertical Farming: Massive, multi-story vertical farms could be integrated into urban environments, providing fresh, locally grown food with minimal land use and water consumption.
Precision Agriculture: Sensors, AI, and robotics could be used to monitor crops and soil conditions in real-time, optimizing irrigation, fertilization, and pest control, reducing resource waste and minimizing environmental impact.
Lab-Grown Food: Technologies for producing meat and other food products in laboratories could become highly advanced, reducing the need for traditional agriculture and its associated environmental footprint.

3. Energy Production:

Space-Based Solar Power: Large-scale solar energy collectors in space could beam clean energy back to Earth, providing a continuous and abundant source of power.
Advanced Geothermal Energy: Deep geothermal plants could tap into the Earth’s immense heat reserves, providing a reliable and sustainable source of energy.
Fusion Power Plants: Fusion reactors, replicating the energy source of the sun, could become a major source of clean and virtually limitless energy for industrial use.

4. Resource Extraction:

Asteroid Mining: Robots and AI systems could be used to mine asteroids and other celestial bodies for valuable resources, reducing the pressure on Earth’s finite reserves.
Sustainable Mining Practices: Advanced technologies could be used to minimize the environmental impact of mining operations, reducing waste, pollution, and habitat destruction.

5. Construction:

Self-Healing Materials: Buildings and infrastructure could be constructed from self-healing materials that can repair themselves, reducing maintenance costs and increasing longevity.
3D-Printed Structures: Large-scale 3D printing could be used to construct buildings and infrastructure using sustainable materials, reducing waste and enabling customized designs.
Biogenic Construction: Buildings could be “grown” using biological processes, such as using trees to create living structures or cultivating materials like mycelium for construction.

6. Transportation:

Autonomous Vehicles: Self-driving vehicles powered by clean energy could revolutionize transportation, reducing traffic congestion, accidents, and pollution.
Hyperloop Systems: High-speed transportation systems like the Hyperloop could connect cities and regions, enabling fast and sustainable travel for both people and goods.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology could transform industries in 4550. The possibilities are vast, and the actual applications will likely be even more innovative and surprising than we can imagine today.

It’s important to remember that the development and implementation of these technologies will require significant research, investment, and collaboration across various fields. But the potential benefits are immense, offering a pathway to a future where human society can thrive in harmony with the planet.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4550 ?

Research and development (R&D) for sustainable technology in 4550 is, by necessity, a thought experiment. We can’t actually conduct research for that distant future. However, we can extrapolate from current scientific trends and imagine the kinds of R&D pathways that might lead to such advanced technologies. Here’s a breakdown of potential areas of focus:

1. Fundamental Science:

New Energy Sources: Exploring theoretical physics for potential energy sources beyond current understanding, such as zero-point energy, dark matter interactions, or other novel phenomena.
Advanced Material Science: Investigating the fundamental properties of matter at the nanoscale and beyond, exploring new materials with unprecedented characteristics like self-healing, super-conductivity at room temperature, and extreme durability.
Consciousness and AI: Deep research into the nature of consciousness and its potential applications in artificial intelligence, potentially leading to highly advanced AI systems that can optimize complex systems and drive innovation.
Quantum Computing: Continued development of quantum computing could unlock new possibilities for simulating complex systems, designing new materials, and accelerating scientific discovery.

2. Engineering and Applied Sciences:

Biomimicry and Bioengineering: Studying biological systems to understand their efficiency and resilience, then applying these principles to engineering design and creating bio-integrated technologies.
Nanotechnology and Molecular Engineering: Developing techniques for manipulating matter at the atomic and molecular level, enabling the creation of custom-designed materials and devices.
Advanced Robotics and Automation: Creating highly sophisticated robots capable of performing complex tasks in various environments, including space, deep sea, and hazardous industrial settings.
Closed-Loop Systems Engineering: Designing and implementing systems that minimize waste and maximize resource reuse, creating circular economies at all scales.

3. Environmental Science and Ecology:

Ecosystem Restoration and Management: Developing advanced techniques for restoring damaged ecosystems and managing natural resources sustainably.
Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation: Researching and implementing technologies for removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere and adapting to the impacts of climate change.
Planetary Engineering: Exploring the possibility of large-scale interventions to manage Earth’s climate and other planetary systems (with careful consideration of ethical implications).

4. Space Exploration and Colonization:

Advanced Propulsion Systems: Developing new propulsion technologies for faster and more efficient space travel, enabling interstellar exploration and colonization.
Space-Based Resource Extraction: Creating robotic systems for mining asteroids and other celestial bodies for resources.
Self-Sustaining Space Habitats: Designing and building closed-loop ecosystems for long-term human habitation in space.

5. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

Convergence of Disciplines: Fostering collaboration between scientists, engineers, designers, and other experts to develop integrated solutions to complex challenges.
Global Research Networks: Establishing international partnerships to share knowledge and resources, accelerating the pace of innovation.

The “How” of R&D in the Distant Future:

It’s likely that by 4550, R&D processes themselves will be significantly advanced. AI could play a major role in analyzing data, generating hypotheses, and even designing experiments. Simulation technologies might allow scientists to model complex systems with unprecedented accuracy. And international collaboration would likely be highly sophisticated, with seamless sharing of information and resources.

Important Note: It’s crucial to acknowledge the ethical dimensions of these research areas. As we develop more powerful technologies, it’s essential to consider their potential impacts on society and the environment. Ethical considerations should be integrated into all stages of research and development.

While we can’t directly do the R&D for 4550 today, the seeds of those future technologies are being planted now. By investing in fundamental science, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, and prioritizing ethical considerations, we can pave the way for a sustainable future.

COURTESY : TURILYTIX

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.