Sustainable technology of 4540

Leave a Comment / Sustainable technology of 4540 / By

Sustainable technology of 4540 ?

t seems like you might be asking about the 3M™ Protective Coverall 4540+. While this product itself isn’t a technology, it plays a role in sustainable practices within various industries. Here’s how:

  • Durability and Protection: The 4540+ is designed to protect workers from hazardous particles and limited liquid splashes. By providing reliable protection, it reduces the need for frequent replacements, which conserves resources and reduces waste.
  • Lightweight and Comfortable: The coverall is made from a lightweight and breathable material, which enhances worker comfort. This can lead to increased productivity and efficiency, which can indirectly contribute to more sustainable operations.
  • Reduced Risk of Contamination: The coverall’s design, with features like knitted cuffs and a sealable storm flap, minimizes the risk of contamination. This helps protect both workers and the environment from potentially harmful substances.

Overall, while the 3M™ Protective Coverall 4540+ is not a technology itself, it supports sustainable practices by:

  • Conserving resources through durability
  • Promoting worker efficiency
  • Reducing the risk of contamination

If you’re interested in sustainable technologies in a broader sense, there are many examples, such as renewable energy technologies, energy-efficient buildings, and sustainable transportation systems. These technologies aim to minimize environmental impact and promote a more sustainable future.

What is Sustainable technology of 4540 ?

It seems you’re interested in how the 3M™ Protective Coverall 4540+ relates to sustainable technology. While the coverall itself isn’t a technology, it plays a role in supporting sustainability in several ways:

  • Resource Efficiency: The 4540+ is designed for durability and reliable protection against hazardous particles and limited liquid splashes. This means it needs to be replaced less frequently, which conserves resources and reduces waste.
  • Worker Well-being: The coverall is made from lightweight, breathable material to enhance worker comfort. This can lead to increased productivity and efficiency, which can indirectly contribute to more sustainable operations.
  • Contamination Prevention: Features like knitted cuffs and a sealable storm flap help minimize the risk of contamination. This protects both workers and the environment from potentially harmful substances.

In essence, the 3M™ Protective Coverall 4540+ supports sustainability by:

  • Extending product lifespan and reducing waste
  • Promoting worker efficiency
  • Preventing contamination

If you’re interested in sustainable technologies in a broader sense, there are many examples, such as renewable energy technologies, energy-efficient buildings, and sustainable transportation systems. These technologies aim to minimize environmental impact and promote a more sustainable future.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4540 ?

The 3M™ Protective Coverall 4540+ is required by workers in various industries who need protection from hazardous particles and limited liquid splashes. Here are some examples:

  • Manufacturing: Workers in manufacturing facilities may be exposed to dust, chemicals, and other potentially harmful substances. The 4540+ provides a barrier to protect their clothing and skin.
  • Construction: Construction sites can be dusty and contain various hazards. The coverall helps protect workers from debris, paint, and other materials.
  • Healthcare: Healthcare workers may need protection from bodily fluids and other contaminants. The 4540+ can be used in certain healthcare settings to provide this protection.
  • Agriculture: Workers in agriculture may be exposed to pesticides, fertilizers, and other chemicals. The coverall helps protect them from these substances.
  • Cleaning and Maintenance: Workers who perform cleaning and maintenance tasks may encounter various hazards, including dust, chemicals, and mold. The 4540+ can help protect them during these tasks.

In general, the 3M™ Protective Coverall 4540+ is required by anyone who works in an environment where they may be exposed to:

  • Hazardous particles: Dust, fibers, asbestos, etc.
  • Limited liquid splashes: Chemicals, paint, bodily fluids, etc.

It’s important to choose the appropriate protective clothing for the specific hazards present in the work environment. The 3M™ Protective Coverall 4540+ is a versatile option that can be used in a variety of industries to help protect workers and promote sustainability.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4540 ?

The 3M™ Protective Coverall 4540+ is required whenever workers are exposed to hazardous particles and limited liquid splashes. This can occur in a variety of situations and industries, including:

  • Manufacturing: When handling or processing materials that produce dust, fibers, or other airborne particles. Also, when there’s a risk of splashes from chemicals or other liquids.
  • Construction: During demolition, renovation, or any work that generates dust, debris, or involves contact with paints, sealants, or other liquids.
  • Healthcare: In situations where there’s a risk of exposure to bodily fluids or other contaminants.
  • Agriculture: When working with pesticides, fertilizers, or other agricultural chemicals.
  • Cleaning and Maintenance: During cleaning tasks that involve contact with dust, chemicals, or potentially hazardous substances.

Essentially, the 4540+ is needed whenever there’s a risk of:

  • Inhalation of hazardous particles: Dust, fibers, asbestos, etc.
  • Skin contact with harmful liquids: Chemicals, paint, bodily fluids, etc.

It’s crucial to assess the specific hazards present in the work environment to determine the appropriate level of protection. The 3M™ Protective Coverall 4540+ is a versatile option for many situations requiring protection against particles and limited liquid splashes.

COURTESY: Tech Evaluate

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4540 ?

The 3M™ Protective Coverall 4540+ is required in a variety of workplaces where there’s a risk of exposure to hazardous particles and limited liquid splashes. Here are some key locations:

  • Factories and Manufacturing Plants: Where workers handle materials that produce dust, fibers, or other airborne particles, and where there’s a risk of chemical or other liquid splashes.
  • Construction Sites: During demolition, renovation, or any work that generates dust, debris, or involves contact with paints, sealants, or other liquids.
  • Hospitals and Healthcare Facilities: In situations where healthcare workers may be exposed to bodily fluids or other contaminants.
  • Farms and Agricultural Settings: When working with pesticides, fertilizers, or other agricultural chemicals.
  • Cleaning and Maintenance Sites: During cleaning tasks that involve contact with dust, chemicals, or potentially hazardous substances.

Essentially, the 4540+ is needed in any environment where there’s a risk of:

  • Inhalation of hazardous particles: Dust, fibers, asbestos, etc.
  • Skin contact with harmful liquids: Chemicals, paint, bodily fluids, etc.

It’s crucial to conduct a thorough risk assessment to determine the specific hazards present in each workplace and choose the appropriate protective clothing. The 3M™ Protective Coverall 4540+ is a versatile option for many situations requiring protection against particles and limited liquid splashes.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4540 ?

The 3M™ Protective Coverall 4540+ is required to be used in a specific way to ensure its effectiveness and contribute to sustainability. Here’s how:

1. Proper Selection:

  • Hazard Assessment: Before using the 4540+, it’s crucial to assess the specific hazards present in the work environment. This includes identifying the types of particles and liquids present, their concentration, and the potential for exposure.
  • Size and Fit: The coverall should be the correct size and fit snugly to provide adequate protection. Loose-fitting coveralls may allow contaminants to enter, while too-tight coveralls can restrict movement and cause discomfort.

2. Correct Usage:

  • Donning and Doffing: The coverall should be donned (put on) and doffed (taken off) following the manufacturer’s instructions to prevent contamination. This typically involves starting with the feet and working upwards, and vice versa when removing.
  • Wearing: The coverall should be worn throughout the duration of potential exposure to hazards. It should not be removed or partially opened in contaminated areas.
  • Inspection: Before each use, the coverall should be inspected for any damage, such as tears, punctures, or loose seams. Damaged coveralls should be replaced immediately.

3. Sustainable Practices:

  • Proper Disposal: After use, the coverall should be disposed of properly according to local regulations. This may involve decontamination or special handling for hazardous materials.
  • Minimizing Waste: To promote sustainability, consider using the coverall for its intended lifespan and avoid unnecessary replacements. This can be achieved by handling the coverall carefully and storing it properly when not in use.
  • Exploring Alternatives: In some cases, reusable coveralls may be a more sustainable option than disposable ones. Consider the specific needs of the workplace and the environmental impact of different options.

By following these guidelines, the 3M™ Protective Coverall 4540+ can be used effectively to protect workers and contribute to a more sustainable work environment.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4540 ?

Unfortunately, I couldn’t find a specific published case study focusing solely on the 3M™ Protective Coverall 4540+. However, I can provide you with a hypothetical case study based on the information available about the product and its applications:

Case Study: Enhancing Safety and Sustainability in a Manufacturing Plant

Background:

A large manufacturing plant producing automotive parts was facing challenges related to worker safety and environmental impact. Workers were exposed to dust, metal shavings, and occasional chemical splashes. The company was also looking for ways to reduce waste and improve its sustainability practices.

Challenge:

The company needed a protective coverall that would provide adequate protection for its workers while also being durable and contributing to sustainability goals.

Solution:

After evaluating various options, the company decided to implement the 3M™ Protective Coverall 4540+ for its workers.

Results:

  • Improved Safety: The 4540+ provided reliable protection against dust, metal shavings, and limited liquid splashes, leading to a reduction in worker injuries and improved overall safety.
  • Increased Durability: The coverall’s durable construction meant it lasted longer than previous options, reducing the need for frequent replacements and saving costs.
  • Enhanced Comfort: The lightweight and breathable material of the 4540+ improved worker comfort, leading to increased productivity and reduced complaints about discomfort.
  • Sustainability Benefits: The longer lifespan of the coverall, combined with proper disposal practices, contributed to a reduction in waste and a more sustainable work environment.

Conclusion:

The implementation of the 3M™ Protective Coverall 4540+ proved to be a successful solution for the manufacturing plant. It improved worker safety, enhanced comfort, and contributed to the company’s sustainability goals. This case study demonstrates how the 4540+ can be a valuable asset for industries looking to protect their workers and reduce their environmental impact.

Note: This is a hypothetical case study. Actual results may vary depending on the specific work environment and how the coverall is used and maintained.

While this case study is hypothetical, it highlights the potential benefits of using the 3M™ Protective Coverall 4540+ in a real-world setting. If you’re interested in learning more about specific applications or industries where this coverall has been successful, you may want to contact 3M directly or search for case studies on their website or through industry publications.

COURTESY : TURILYTIX

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4540 ?

While a specific white paper dedicated solely to the 3M™ Protective Coverall 4540+ and its sustainability aspects might not be readily available, I can offer you some insights and potential avenues to explore further:

Key Sustainability Features of the 4540+:

  • Durability and Extended Lifespan: The 4540+ is designed for durability, which means it can withstand wear and tear for a longer period compared to less robust coveralls. This translates to fewer replacements, reduced consumption of raw materials, and less waste generation.
  • Lightweight and Efficient Design: The lightweight nature of the 4540+ not only enhances worker comfort but also contributes to resource efficiency. Less material is used in its production, and its lightweight design can potentially reduce energy consumption during transportation.
  • Protection and Reduced Contamination: By providing reliable protection against hazardous particles and limited liquid splashes, the 4540+ helps prevent contamination. This can minimize the need for additional cleaning or decontamination processes, which can be resource-intensive.

Potential Areas for Further Exploration:

  • Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): A comprehensive LCA of the 4540+ would provide a detailed analysis of its environmental impact throughout its entire life cycle, from raw material extraction to manufacturing, use, and disposal. This would help identify areas for improvement in terms of sustainability.
  • Comparison with Alternatives: A comparative analysis of the 4540+ with other protective coveralls, including reusable options, would shed light on its relative sustainability performance. This could consider factors such as material composition, durability, manufacturing processes, and end-of-life management.
  • Case Studies and Best Practices: Gathering case studies from organizations that have successfully implemented the 4540+ and integrated it with sustainable practices would provide valuable insights and best practices for others to follow.

Where to Find More Information:

  • 3M Website and Resources: Explore the 3M website for technical datasheets, brochures, and other resources related to the 4540+. Look for any information on sustainability initiatives or environmental certifications associated with the product.
  • Industry Publications and Reports: Search for white papers, articles, or reports in industry publications that focus on sustainable practices in personal protective equipment (PPE) or related sectors.
  • Sustainability Organizations and Databases: Consult websites and databases of sustainability organizations or research institutions for information on sustainable PPE and related topics.

By combining the information provided here with further research, you can gain a better understanding of the sustainability aspects of the 3M™ Protective Coverall 4540+ and its potential contributions to a more sustainable work environment.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4540 ?

The 3M™ Protective Coverall 4540+ finds industrial applications across a range of sectors where protection against hazardous particles and limited liquid splashes is crucial. Here are some key examples:

  • Manufacturing:
    • Automotive: Workers involved in painting, sanding, or handling composite materials need protection from dust, fibers, and chemical splashes.
    • Chemical Processing: Employees handling chemicals or working in environments with potential spills require protection from liquid splashes and chemical exposure.
    • Pharmaceuticals: Workers in pharmaceutical manufacturing need protection from dust, powders, and potential contamination.
    • Electronics: Manufacturing processes may involve exposure to fine particles, chemicals, and solvents, necessitating protective coveralls.
  • Construction:
    • Asbestos Abatement: Workers handling asbestos require specialized protective clothing to prevent the inhalation of harmful fibers.
    • Demolition: Demolition work generates dust, debris, and potential exposure to hazardous materials, making protective coveralls essential.
    • Painting and Coating: Workers applying paints, coatings, or sealants need protection from splashes and exposure to chemicals.
  • Healthcare:
    • Hospitals and Clinics: Healthcare workers may need protection from bodily fluids, infectious agents, and chemical disinfectants.
    • Laboratories: Laboratory personnel handling potentially hazardous materials or conducting experiments require protective clothing.
  • Agriculture:
    • Pesticide Application: Workers applying pesticides or fertilizers need protection from chemical exposure.
    • Animal Handling: In some cases, protective coveralls may be needed when handling animals or working in environments with potential biological hazards.
  • Other Industries:
    • Cleaning and Maintenance: Workers performing cleaning or maintenance tasks may encounter dust, chemicals, or other hazards.
    • Mining: Mining operations can expose workers to dust, particles, and potentially hazardous substances.

Key Benefits in Industrial Applications:

  • Worker Safety: The 4540+ provides a barrier against hazardous particles and limited liquid splashes, reducing the risk of injuries and illnesses.
  • Contamination Control: In sensitive industries like pharmaceuticals or electronics, the coverall helps prevent contamination of products or processes.
  • Improved Productivity: Comfortable and well-fitting coveralls allow workers to move freely and perform their tasks efficiently.
  • Sustainability: The durability of the 4540+ contributes to resource efficiency and waste reduction.

By providing reliable protection and promoting sustainable practices, the 3M™ Protective Coverall 4540+ plays a vital role in various industrial applications.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4540 ?

While I don’t have access to specific internal research and development details for the 3M™ Protective Coverall 4540+, I can outline potential areas where R&D could focus on enhancing its sustainability:

1. Materials:

  • Recycled Content: Exploring the use of recycled materials in the coverall’s construction would reduce reliance on virgin resources and minimize waste.
  • Bio-based Materials: Investigating the potential of bio-based or renewable materials could further decrease the environmental footprint of the product.
  • Biodegradability: Researching materials that are biodegradable or compostable under specific conditions could offer a more sustainable end-of-life option.

2. Manufacturing Processes:

  • Energy Efficiency: Optimizing manufacturing processes to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Waste Reduction: Minimizing waste generation during production through efficient cutting techniques and material utilization.
  • Sustainable Supply Chains: Sourcing materials from suppliers with strong environmental and social responsibility practices.

3. Product Design:

  • Durability Enhancement: Increasing the coverall’s durability to extend its lifespan and reduce the need for frequent replacements.
  • Lightweight Optimization: Further reducing the weight of the coverall without compromising its protective properties to improve resource efficiency.
  • Modular Design: Developing a modular design that allows for easy repair or replacement of individual components, extending the product’s overall lifespan.

4. End-of-Life Management:

  • Recycling Programs: Establishing take-back programs or partnerships to facilitate the collection and recycling of used coveralls.
  • Composting Options: Exploring the feasibility of composting certain components of the coverall under industrial composting conditions.
  • Waste-to-Energy: Investigating the potential of using the coverall as a feedstock for waste-to-energy processes.

5. Performance and Safety:

  • Breathability Improvement: Enhancing the breathability of the coverall to improve worker comfort and reduce heat stress, potentially leading to increased productivity.
  • Protection Enhancement: Continuously improving the coverall’s protective capabilities against a wider range of hazards.

General R&D Considerations:

  • Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): Conducting thorough LCAs to evaluate the environmental impact of the coverall throughout its entire life cycle, from material extraction to end-of-life management.
  • Collaboration and Partnerships: Collaborating with material scientists, textile engineers, and other experts to develop innovative and sustainable solutions.
  • Industry Standards and Certifications: Adhering to relevant industry standards and certifications to ensure the safety and sustainability of the product.

By focusing on these areas of research and development, the 3M™ Protective Coverall 4540+ can continue to evolve and become an even more sustainable option for protecting workers in various industries.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
  53. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
  77. ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
  96. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
  107. ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050

Recommended HashTags

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »