Sustainable Technology Of 4160

Sustainable technology of 4160 ?

It seems like you’re interested in sustainable technology, but the year 4160 is quite far in the future. It’s difficult to predict exactly what technology will look like that far ahead, but we can make some educated guesses based on current trends.

Here are some possibilities for sustainable technology in 4160:

Advanced energy solutions: We might see widespread use of fusion power, or perhaps even more exotic energy sources like zero-point energy. Solar energy could be collected from space and beamed down to Earth.
Closed-loop systems: Technologies that mimic natural ecosystems, recycling all resources and producing zero waste, could be commonplace. This could apply to everything from manufacturing to agriculture.
Biotechnology: Advances in genetic engineering and synthetic biology could allow us to create materials and products that are biodegradable and even self-healing. We might also see the development of crops that are highly efficient at photosynthesis and require minimal resources.
Artificial intelligence: AI could play a major role in optimizing resource use and minimizing waste. For example, AI-powered systems could manage energy grids, transportation networks, and even individual households to ensure maximum efficiency.
Space-based industries: Mining asteroids and other celestial bodies could provide access to resources without harming Earth’s environment. Manufacturing and even agriculture could take place in space, reducing the impact on our planet.

Of course, this is just speculation. The actual technologies of 4160 could be very different from what we imagine today. But one thing is certain: sustainability will be a key driver of technological development in the centuries to come.

What is Sustainable technology of 4160 ?

Predicting the exact nature of sustainable technology in 4160 is a fascinating thought experiment! While we can’t know for sure, we can speculate based on current trends and the ever-accelerating pace of technological advancement. Here are some possibilities:

1. Energy:

Fusion Power Domination: Imagine a world where clean, abundant fusion energy powers entire civilizations. This could be the primary source, with advanced systems for distribution and management.
Space-Based Solar: Gigantic solar arrays orbiting Earth could capture immense amounts of energy and beam it down to the surface, providing a constant and reliable power source.
Exotic Energy Sources: Perhaps even more advanced sources like zero-point energy or harnessing other fundamental forces of the universe will be discovered and utilized.

2. Resource Management:

Closed-Loop Systems: Inspired by nature, technologies could flawlessly recycle and reuse all resources. Manufacturing, agriculture, and daily life would operate in closed loops, generating zero waste.
Advanced Materials: Biodegradable, self-healing materials created through biotechnology could replace traditional ones, minimizing environmental impact and waste.
Precision Agriculture: AI-powered systems could manage agriculture with incredible precision, optimizing water and nutrient use, and minimizing land impact.

3. Biotechnology and Manufacturing:

Synthetic Biology: We might see the creation of new organisms and biological systems for manufacturing, producing materials with specific properties and functions in a sustainable way.
3D Bioprinting: Imagine printing organs, tissues, and even entire products from biological materials, reducing waste and customizing production to individual needs.

4. Artificial Intelligence and Automation:

AI-Driven Optimization: AI could manage complex systems like energy grids, transportation networks, and resource allocation, ensuring maximum efficiency and sustainability.
Autonomous Systems: Robots and AI could handle resource extraction, manufacturing, and even waste management, minimizing human impact on the environment.

5. Space and Extraterrestrial Resources:

Space-Based Industries: Mining asteroids and other celestial bodies could provide access to resources without harming Earth’s environment. Manufacturing and even agriculture could move to space.
Space Colonization: Perhaps humanity will have expanded beyond Earth, with self-sustaining colonies on other planets utilizing local resources and minimizing impact on our home planet.

Important Considerations:

Technological Singularity: If AI surpasses human intelligence, it could lead to unpredictable and potentially unimaginable technological advancements.
Ethical Considerations: The development and use of these technologies would need careful ethical consideration to ensure they are used responsibly and for the benefit of all.

It’s important to remember that this is all speculation. The actual technologies of 4160 could be vastly different from what we imagine today. However, the pursuit of sustainability will undoubtedly be a major driving force behind technological development in the centuries to come.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4160 ?

It’s interesting to think about who might “require” sustainable technology in 4160. Here’s a breakdown of potential stakeholders and why they might need it:

1. Humanity as a Whole:

Survival: By 4160, the consequences of unsustainable practices could be dire. Humanity might require sustainable technology to survive environmental challenges like climate change, resource depletion, and pollution.
Quality of Life: Even if survival isn’t immediately threatened, people will likely demand a high quality of life. This would necessitate sustainable technologies to provide clean energy, healthy food, and a comfortable environment.

2. Governments and Organizations:

Regulation: Governments might require industries to adopt sustainable technologies to meet environmental regulations and ensure the well-being of their citizens.
Economic Stability: Sustainable technologies could be essential for long-term economic stability, as they would promote resource efficiency and reduce reliance on finite resources.

3. Industries and Businesses:

Resource Scarcity: As resources become scarcer, businesses might require sustainable technologies to remain competitive and access the materials they need.
Consumer Demand: Consumers are likely to increasingly demand sustainable products and services, forcing businesses to adopt sustainable practices to meet their needs.

4. Individuals:

Personal Responsibility: Individuals might feel a sense of personal responsibility to adopt sustainable technologies in their daily lives to minimize their environmental impact.
Economic Incentives: Sustainable technologies could become more affordable and accessible, making them a practical choice for individuals looking to save money and live more sustainably.

5. Future Generations:

Inheriting a Habitable Planet: Future generations will require sustainable technologies to inherit a habitable planet with sufficient resources and a healthy environment.

Important Note:

The word “require” implies a necessity or a lack of choice. In reality, the adoption of sustainable technology in 4160 will likely be driven by a combination of factors, including:

Necessity: As environmental challenges become more pressing, sustainable technologies will become increasingly necessary for survival and well-being.
Economic Incentives: The development and adoption of sustainable technologies could create new economic opportunities and drive innovation.
Social and Ethical Considerations: People may choose to adopt sustainable technologies out of a sense of responsibility to the environment and future generations.

It’s likely that by 4160, sustainable technology will be deeply integrated into all aspects of life, not just out of necessity, but also because it will be the most logical and beneficial way to live.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4160 ?

That’s a great question! It’s not just who needs sustainable technology in 4160, but when it will become absolutely essential. Here’s a breakdown of the timeline:

1. The Present and Near Future:

Growing Urgency: Even today, we see the increasing need for sustainable technology. Climate change, resource depletion, and pollution are already impacting our world. The need is growing more urgent with each passing year.
Early Adoption: Many industries and individuals are already adopting sustainable practices and technologies. This is driven by a mix of environmental awareness, economic benefits, and regulatory pressures.

2. The Mid-Term Future (Next few decades):

Tipping Points: We may reach critical tipping points in the coming decades where the effects of environmental damage become irreversible. This will make sustainable technology not just desirable, but essential for survival.
Technological Advancements: We can expect rapid advancements in sustainable technologies in the coming decades. This will make them more efficient, affordable, and widely available.

3. The Long-Term Future (Centuries from now):

Integration: By 4160, sustainable technology will likely be fully integrated into all aspects of life. It will be the norm, not the exception.
Dependence: Humanity may become entirely dependent on sustainable technology for its survival and well-being. By this point, the consequences of unsustainable practices could be so severe that there’s no other option.

Important Considerations:

Proactive vs. Reactive: Ideally, we should adopt sustainable technologies proactively, before we reach critical tipping points. Waiting until it’s absolutely “required” might be too late.
Continuous Development: The need for sustainable technology will continue to evolve as our understanding of the environment and our technological capabilities advance. Continuous development and innovation will be crucial.

In essence:

The need for sustainable technology is not something that will suddenly appear in 4160. It’s a need that is already present and will only become more critical over time. The timeline for when it becomes absolutely “required” is difficult to pinpoint, but it’s safe to say that the sooner we embrace sustainable practices and technologies, the better our chances of a thriving future.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4160 ?

That’s a very insightful question! It’s not just about when sustainable technology will be needed, but also where it will be most crucial in 4160. Here are some key areas:

1. Urban Centers:

Mega-cities: By 4160, urban centers could be massive. Sustainable technologies will be essential to manage resources like energy, water, and waste in these densely populated areas.
Smart Cities: Cities will likely be highly interconnected and optimized using AI. Sustainable technologies will be needed to ensure efficient infrastructure, transportation, and resource management.

2. Industrial Zones:

Manufacturing: Sustainable technologies will be crucial in manufacturing to minimize waste, recycle materials, and reduce the environmental impact of production.
Resource Extraction: If mining or resource extraction still occurs, it will need to be done sustainably to minimize damage to ecosystems and ensure long-term resource availability.

3. Rural and Agricultural Areas:

Food Production: Sustainable agriculture will be essential to feed a growing population. Technologies that minimize land use, water consumption, and pollution will be crucial.
Ecosystem Preservation: Sustainable technologies will be needed to protect natural ecosystems and biodiversity in rural areas.

4. Transportation Networks:

Global Connectivity: Sustainable transportation systems will be needed to connect people and goods across the globe with minimal environmental impact.
Personal Mobility: Sustainable technologies will be needed to provide individuals with efficient and eco-friendly transportation options.

5. Space and Beyond:

Space Colonies: If humanity has expanded beyond Earth, sustainable technologies will be essential for establishing and maintaining self-sufficient colonies on other planets or in space.
Extraterrestrial Resource Use: If resources are extracted from asteroids or other celestial bodies, it will need to be done sustainably to avoid environmental damage.

Important Considerations:

Global Interconnectedness: In 4160, the world will likely be even more interconnected than it is today. Sustainable technologies will be needed not just in specific locations, but globally to ensure the health of the planet as a whole.
Equity and Access: It will be crucial to ensure that sustainable technologies are accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status.

In essence:

Sustainable technology in 4160 will be needed everywhere, from bustling cities to remote rural areas, and even beyond Earth. It will be an integral part of how humanity manages its resources, interacts with the environment, and ensures its long-term survival and well-being.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4160 ?

That’s a crucial question! It’s not just who, when, and where sustainable technology is needed in 4160, but also how it will be implemented and integrated into society. Here are some key aspects:

1. Integration with Existing Systems:

Seamless Incorporation: Sustainable technologies will need to be seamlessly integrated into existing infrastructure, from energy grids and transportation networks to buildings and communication systems.
Retrofitting and Upgrades: Older systems might need to be retrofitted or upgraded to accommodate sustainable technologies. This could be a major challenge, but also an opportunity for innovation.

2. Technological Advancements:

Continuous Innovation: Sustainable technology will require continuous innovation and development to improve efficiency, reduce costs, and address emerging challenges.
Convergence: We might see the convergence of different technologies, such as AI, biotechnology, and nanotechnology, to create even more advanced sustainable solutions.

3. Policy and Regulation:

Incentives and Standards: Governments will likely play a role in promoting sustainable technology through incentives, regulations, and standards.
Global Cooperation: International cooperation will be essential to address global challenges like climate change and ensure the equitable distribution of sustainable technologies.

4. Social and Cultural Factors:

Education and Awareness: Public education and awareness campaigns will be needed to promote the adoption of sustainable technologies and encourage sustainable lifestyles.
Behavioral Change: People may need to change their behaviors and habits to fully embrace sustainable practices. This could require a shift in values and priorities.

5. Economic Considerations:

Cost-Effectiveness: Sustainable technologies will need to be cost-effective to be widely adopted. This will require continued research and development to bring down costs.
Economic Opportunities: The development and deployment of sustainable technologies could create new economic opportunities and jobs.

6. Ethical Considerations:

Responsible Innovation: It will be crucial to ensure that sustainable technologies are developed and used responsibly, with careful consideration of their potential social and environmental impacts.
Equity and Justice: Sustainable technologies should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status.

In essence:

The “how” of sustainable technology in 4160 will involve a complex interplay of technological advancements, policy and regulation, social and cultural factors, economic considerations, and ethical considerations. It will require a holistic and integrated approach to ensure that sustainable technologies are not only effective but also equitable and beneficial for all of humanity.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4160 ?

It’s tricky to create a traditional “case study” for sustainable technology in 4160, as that would involve real-world examples and data. However, we can construct a hypothetical scenario, a “future history” if you will, to illustrate how sustainable technology might be essential and integrated by that time.

Scenario: The Great Restoration (4160)

Context: By the mid-22nd century (around 2150), the accumulated effects of climate change and unsustainable practices had led to a series of global crises. Coastal cities were submerged, extreme weather events were frequent, and resource scarcity caused widespread conflict.

The Turning Point: A global movement arose, demanding radical change. Scientists, engineers, and policymakers collaborated to develop and implement sustainable technologies on an unprecedented scale.

Key Technologies and Their Impact:

Atmospheric Carbon Capture and Conversion: Massive facilities, powered by advanced fusion energy, began extracting CO2 from the atmosphere and converting it into usable materials or safely stored carbon. This gradually reversed the greenhouse effect.
Closed-Loop Resource Systems: Cities and industries adopted closed-loop systems, where all waste was recycled and reused. Advanced biotechnology created biodegradable materials that replaced plastics and other pollutants.
Precision Agriculture and Vertical Farms: Food production shifted to highly efficient vertical farms and precision agriculture, minimizing land use and water consumption. Genetically engineered crops were developed to thrive in harsh conditions and require minimal resources.
Global Smart Grid: A worldwide smart grid, powered by a combination of fusion energy and space-based solar, ensured efficient and equitable distribution of clean energy. AI managed the grid, optimizing energy use and minimizing waste.
Restored Ecosystems: Through careful ecological engineering and the use of bioremediation technologies, damaged ecosystems were gradually restored. Forests were replanted, oceans were cleaned, and biodiversity was increased.

Outcome:

By 4160, the world had undergone a “Great Restoration.” The climate stabilized, resources were managed sustainably, and ecosystems thrived. Humanity had learned from its past mistakes and embraced a new era of harmony with nature.

Lessons from this “Case Study”:

Urgency of Action: It highlights the importance of taking action on sustainability now, before it’s too late.
Technological Potential: It demonstrates the potential of technology to solve environmental challenges, but emphasizes that technology alone is not enough.
Societal Transformation: It underscores the need for societal transformation, including changes in values, behaviors, and governance, to achieve true sustainability.

While this is a fictional scenario, it serves as a reminder that the choices we make today will determine the future of our planet. By embracing sustainable technology and adopting sustainable practices, we can create a future where humanity and nature can thrive together.

COURTESY : Voith Group

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4160 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 4160: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 4160. While predicting the future with certainty is impossible, we can extrapolate from current trends and envision a world where sustainability is deeply ingrained in every facet of human life. This paper examines potential key technologies, their societal impact, and the necessary steps to achieve this vision.

1. Introduction:

The pursuit of sustainability is not a static goal but a continuous journey. By 4160, humanity will likely have navigated significant environmental challenges and embraced a paradigm shift towards harmonious coexistence with the planet. This paper envisions a future where technology plays a crucial role in achieving and maintaining this balance.

2. Key Technological Domains:

2.1 Energy:
- Fusion Energy Dominance: Fusion power, potentially supplemented by other advanced energy sources like zero-point energy or space-based solar, will likely be the primary energy source. Advanced materials and energy storage solutions will ensure efficient distribution and utilization.
- Decentralized Grids: Smart, decentralized energy grids, managed by AI, will optimize energy consumption and minimize waste.
2.2 Resource Management:
- Closed-Loop Economies: Circular economies will be the norm, with near-perfect recycling and reuse of all resources. Advanced material science, including biodegradable and self-healing materials, will minimize waste generation.
- Precision Resource Management: AI-powered systems will manage resource allocation with unprecedented precision, optimizing everything from water usage in agriculture to material flow in manufacturing.
2.3 Food and Agriculture:
- Vertical and Controlled Environment Agriculture: Urban vertical farms and controlled-environment agriculture will supplement traditional farming, maximizing food production while minimizing land and water usage.
- Sustainable Aquaculture and Protein Alternatives: Sustainable aquaculture practices and the development of alternative protein sources will address the growing demand for food without straining natural resources.
2.4 Manufacturing and Production:
- Advanced Biomanufacturing: Biotechnology and synthetic biology will enable the production of materials and products using biological systems, minimizing environmental impact and creating truly sustainable manufacturing processes.
- Additive Manufacturing (4D Printing): Advanced 4D printing will allow for on-demand creation of complex products, minimizing waste and enabling customization.
2.5 Information and Communication Technologies (ICT):
- AI-Driven Optimization: AI will be integrated into nearly every aspect of life, optimizing resource usage, managing infrastructure, and facilitating sustainable decision-making.
- Global Connectivity: Advanced communication networks will connect people and systems globally, fostering collaboration and knowledge sharing for sustainable development.
2.6 Space and Extraterrestrial Resources:
- Space-Based Industries: Resource extraction from asteroids and other celestial bodies may supplement terrestrial resources, reducing the environmental impact of mining on Earth.
- Space Colonization: Long-term space colonization will necessitate the development of closed-loop life support systems and sustainable resource utilization in extraterrestrial environments.

3. Societal Impact:

Environmental Restoration: Sustainable technologies will facilitate the restoration of damaged ecosystems and the mitigation of climate change impacts.
Enhanced Quality of Life: Access to clean energy, abundant resources, and a healthy environment will enhance the quality of life for all.
Global Equity: Sustainable technologies will be crucial for addressing global inequalities and ensuring equitable access to resources and opportunities.

4. Challenges and Considerations:

Ethical Implications: The development and deployment of advanced technologies will require careful consideration of ethical implications, including potential biases in AI systems and the responsible use of biotechnology.
Technological Accessibility: Ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies will be essential to prevent further exacerbation of existing inequalities.
Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource depletion will require unprecedented levels of international cooperation.

5. Conclusion:

The vision of a sustainable future in 4160 is ambitious but achievable. By embracing innovation, fostering global collaboration, and prioritizing ethical considerations, we can create a world where technology empowers humanity to live in harmony with the planet for generations to come. The journey towards this future begins today, with the choices we make and the actions we take to promote sustainability.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4160 ?

You’re asking about the practical applications of sustainable technology in industry in 4160. That’s a fascinating area to explore! Here are some potential examples, keeping in mind that this is speculative based on current trends:

1. Manufacturing:

Closed-loop Production: Imagine factories where all waste is recycled and reused on-site. Advanced material science and biotechnology could enable the creation of products from biodegradable or even self-healing materials. This would minimize resource depletion and pollution.
On-Demand Production: 4D printing and advanced additive manufacturing could allow for the creation of products on demand, minimizing waste from overproduction and enabling highly customized goods.
AI-Optimized Processes: AI could manage entire manufacturing processes, optimizing energy use, material flow, and minimizing waste. This could lead to highly efficient and sustainable production.

2. Energy:

Fusion-Powered Industries: Industries could be powered by clean and abundant fusion energy, eliminating the need for fossil fuels and drastically reducing carbon emissions.
Decentralized Energy Systems: Factories and industrial complexes might have their own localized energy generation and distribution systems, powered by renewable sources and managed by AI to optimize efficiency.

3. Resource Extraction:

Sustainable Mining: If mining is still necessary, it could be done with minimal environmental impact using advanced technologies like AI-guided robots and in-situ resource extraction techniques.
Asteroid Mining: Industries might increasingly rely on resources extracted from asteroids or other celestial bodies, reducing the need to mine on Earth and minimizing damage to our planet’s ecosystems.

4. Agriculture and Food Production:

Vertical Farms and Controlled Environments: Industries could utilize vertical farms and controlled environment agriculture to produce food in urban areas, minimizing transportation costs and land use.
Sustainable Aquaculture: Advanced aquaculture techniques could provide a sustainable source of protein, reducing pressure on wild fish populations.

5. Construction and Infrastructure:

Self-Healing Materials: Buildings and infrastructure could be built with self-healing materials that repair themselves, reducing maintenance costs and extending their lifespan.
Sustainable Construction Practices: Construction could utilize recycled and biodegradable materials, minimizing waste and reducing the environmental impact of building projects.

6. Transportation:

Sustainable Transportation Networks: Industries could rely on sustainable transportation networks powered by clean energy, such as electric vehicles, high-speed trains, and even advanced air transport systems.
Autonomous Logistics: AI-powered autonomous vehicles and drones could optimize logistics and supply chains, minimizing fuel consumption and reducing transportation costs.

Important Considerations:

Integration: These sustainable technologies would need to be seamlessly integrated into existing industrial infrastructure and processes.
Economic Viability: Sustainable technologies would need to be economically viable to be widely adopted by industries.
Global Collaboration: Achieving industrial sustainability on a global scale would require international cooperation and the sharing of knowledge and technologies.

By embracing these and other sustainable technologies, industries in 4160 could operate in a way that is both efficient and environmentally responsible, contributing to a thriving and sustainable future.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4160 ?

It’s fascinating to consider the research and development (R&D) that might lead to sustainable technology in 4160. While we can’t know the specifics, we can imagine some key areas of focus:

1. Advanced Energy Technologies:

Fusion Breakthroughs: Continued research into fusion energy will be crucial to achieve efficient and cost-effective fusion power. This could involve exploring new reactor designs, plasma confinement techniques, and materials science.
Exotic Energy Sources: Scientists might investigate more unconventional energy sources, such as zero-point energy or harnessing other fundamental forces of the universe. This could involve theoretical physics research and experimental validation.
Energy Storage and Transmission: Developing advanced energy storage solutions, like high-capacity batteries or even more exotic methods, will be essential for integrating renewable energy sources and ensuring a stable energy supply. Research into efficient and lossless energy transmission will also be crucial.

2. Resource Management and Materials Science:

Closed-Loop Systems: R&D will focus on creating truly closed-loop systems for resource management, where all waste is recycled and reused. This could involve developing new materials that are easily recyclable or biodegradable, as well as advanced separation and processing technologies.
Biotechnology and Biomaterials: Continued research in biotechnology and synthetic biology could lead to the creation of new materials with desired properties, such as biodegradability, self-healing capabilities, and even the ability to adapt to changing environments.
Advanced Sensors and AI: Developing advanced sensors and AI systems will be crucial for monitoring resource use, optimizing processes, and minimizing waste in real-time. This could involve research in nanotechnology, machine learning, and data analytics.

3. Food and Agriculture:

Precision Agriculture: R&D will focus on developing precision agriculture techniques that optimize resource use, such as water and nutrients, while minimizing environmental impact. This could involve using sensors, AI, and robotics to manage crops with unprecedented precision.
Vertical Farming and Controlled Environments: Research into vertical farming and controlled environment agriculture will be crucial for increasing food production in urban areas and minimizing land use. This could involve optimizing growing conditions, developing new crop varieties, and creating efficient lighting and climate control systems.
Sustainable Aquaculture and Protein Alternatives: R&D will focus on developing sustainable aquaculture practices that minimize environmental impact and provide a healthy source of protein. Research into alternative protein sources, such as plant-based proteins or cultured meat, will also be important.

4. Space and Extraterrestrial Resources:

Space-Based Resource Extraction: If humanity expands beyond Earth, R&D will be needed to develop efficient and sustainable methods for extracting resources from asteroids and other celestial bodies. This could involve robotics, advanced materials, and in-situ resource utilization techniques.
Closed-Loop Life Support Systems: For long-term space colonization, R&D will focus on creating closed-loop life support systems that can recycle air, water, and waste. This could involve integrating biological and engineering systems to create self-sustaining ecosystems in space.

5. Cross-Cutting Areas:

Artificial Intelligence: AI will play a crucial role in many areas of sustainable technology, from optimizing energy grids to managing resource allocation. Continued research in AI, machine learning, and robotics will be essential.
Nanotechnology: Nanotechnology could enable the creation of new materials with unique properties, as well as advanced sensors and devices for monitoring the environment and optimizing resource use.
Social and Behavioral Sciences: Research in social and behavioral sciences will be crucial for understanding how to promote the adoption of sustainable technologies and encourage sustainable lifestyles.

Important Considerations:

Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Addressing the complex challenges of sustainable technology will require interdisciplinary collaboration between scientists, engineers, social scientists, and other experts.
Long-Term Vision: R&D in sustainable technology will require a long-term vision and sustained investment, as many of the most promising solutions may take decades to develop.
Ethical Considerations: It will be crucial to consider the ethical implications of new technologies and ensure that they are developed and used responsibly.

By focusing on these key areas of R&D, we can pave the way for a future where sustainable technology is not just a vision, but a reality.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 5–6.
^ Zhang, Wei; Li, Binshuai; Xue, Rui; Wang, Chengcheng; Cao, Wei (2021). “A systematic bibliometric review of clean energy transition: Implications for low-carbon development”. PLOS ONE. 16 (12): e0261091. Bibcode:2021PLoSO..1661091Z. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0261091. PMC 8641874. PMID 34860855.
^ United Nations Development Programme 2016, p. 5.
^ “Definitions: energy, sustainability and the future”. OpenLearn. The Open University. Archived from the original on 27 January 2021. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
^ Golus̆in, Popov & Dodić 2013, p. 8.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Hammond, Geoffrey P.; Jones, Craig I. “Sustainability criteria for energy resources and technologies”. In Galarraga, González-Eguino & Markandya (2011), pp. 21–47.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNECE 2020, pp. 3–4.
^ Gunnarsdottir, I.; Davidsdottir, B.; Worrell, E.; Sigurgeirsdottir, S. (May 2021). “Sustainable energy development: History of the concept and emerging themes”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 141: 110770. Bibcode:2021RSERv.14110770G. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110770. hdl:1874/411740.
^ Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 1–2.
^ Vera, Ivan; Langlois, Lucille (2007). “Energy indicators for sustainable development”. Energy. 32 (6): 875–882. Bibcode:2007Ene….32..875V. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2006.08.006.
^ Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 3–5.
^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2021). “What are the safest and cleanest sources of energy?”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 15 January 2024. Data sources: Markandya & Wilkinson (2007); UNSCEAR (2008; 2018); Sovacool et al. (2016); IPCC AR5 (2014); Pehl et al. (2017); Ember Energy (2021).
^ Jump up to:^a ^b United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. 46.
^ “Global Historical Emissions”. Climate Watch. Archived from the original on 4 June 2021. Retrieved 19 August 2021.
^ Ge, Mengpin; Friedrich, Johannes; Vigna, Leandro (August 2021). “4 Charts Explain Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Countries and Sectors”. World Resources Institute. Archived from the original on 19 August 2021. Retrieved 19 August 2021.
^ “The Paris Agreement”. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Archived from the original on 19 March 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
^ Watts, Nick; Amann, Markus; Arnell, Nigel; Ayeb-Karlsson, Sonja; et al. (2021). “The 2020 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: responding to converging crises” (PDF). The Lancet. 397 (10269): 151. Bibcode:2021Lanc..397..129W. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32290-X. PMC 7616803. PMID 33278353.
^ “Every breath you take: The staggering, true cost of air pollution”. United Nations Development Programme. 4 June 2019. Archived from the original on 20 April 2021. Retrieved 4 May 2021.
^ “New WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines aim to save millions of lives from air pollution”. World Health Organization. 22 September 2021. Archived from the original on 23 September 2021. Retrieved 16 October 2021.
^ “Acid Rain and Water”. United States Geological Survey. Archived from the original on 27 June 2021. Retrieved 14 October 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b World Health Organization 2018, p. 16.
^ “Ambient (outdoor) air pollution”. World Health Organization. 22 September 2021. Archived from the original on 8 October 2021. Retrieved 22 October 2021.
^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2019). “Access to Energy”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 1 April 2021. Retrieved 1 April 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b World Health Organization 2016, pp. vii–xiv.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 118.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, pp. 470–472.
^ Tester et al. 2012, p. 504.
^ Kessides, Ioannis N.; Toman, Michael (28 July 2011). “The Global Energy Challenge”. World Bank. Archived from the original on 25 July 2019. Retrieved 27 September 2019.
^ Morris et al. 2015, pp. 24–27.
^ “Access to clean cooking”. SDG7: Data and Projections. IEA. October 2020. Archived from the original on 6 December 2019. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
^ IEA 2021, p. 167.
^ Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu (20 July 2022). “Winners and losers of energy sustainability—Global assessment of the Sustainable Development Goals”. Science of the Total Environment. 831. 154945. Bibcode:2022ScTEn.83154945S. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154945. hdl:11250/3023660. PMID 35367559.
^ Deputy Secretary-General (6 June 2018). “Sustainable Development Goal 7 on Reliable, Modern Energy ‘Golden Thread’ Linking All Other Targets, Deputy-Secretary-General Tells High-Level Panel” (Press release). United Nations. Archived from the original on 17 May 2021. Retrieved 19 March 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Goal 7: Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all”. SDG Tracker. Archived from the original on 2 February 2021. Retrieved 12 March 2021.
^ “Energy use per person”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 28 November 2020. Retrieved 16 July 2021.
^ “Europe 2030: Energy saving to become “first fuel””. EU Science Hub. European Commission. 25 February 2016. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
^ Motherway, Brian (19 December 2019). “Energy efficiency is the first fuel, and demand for it needs to grow”. IEA. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
^ “Energy Efficiency 2018: Analysis and outlooks to 2040”. IEA. October 2018. Archived from the original on 29 September 2020.
^ Fernandez Pales, Araceli; Bouckaert, Stéphanie; Abergel, Thibaut; Goodson, Timothy (10 June 2021). “Net zero by 2050 hinges on a global push to increase energy efficiency”. IEA. Archived from the original on 20 July 2021. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA 2021, pp. 68–69.
^ Mundaca, Luis; Ürge-Vorsatz, Diana; Wilson, Charlie (February 2019). “Demand-side approaches for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C”. Energy Efficiency. 12 (2): 343–362. Bibcode:2019EnEff..12..343M. doi:10.1007/s12053-018-9722-9.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA, IRENA, United Nations Statistics Division, World Bank, World Health Organization 2021, p. 12.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA, IRENA, United Nations Statistics Division, World Bank, World Health Organization 2021, p. 11.
^ Brockway, Paul E.; Sorrell, Steve; Semieniuk, Gregor; Heun, Matthew Kuperus; Court, Victor (May 2021). “Energy efficiency and economy-wide rebound effects: A review of the evidence and its implications”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 141: 110781. Bibcode:2021RSERv.14110781B. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110781.
^ “Energy Efficiency 2019”. IEA. November 2019. Archived from the original on 13 October 2020. Retrieved 21 September 2020.
^ Bond, Kingsmill; Butler-Sloss, Sam; Lovins, Amory; Speelman, Laurens; Topping, Nigel (13 June 2023). “Report / 2023 / X-Change: Electricity / On track for disruption”. Rocky Mountain Institute. Archived from the original on 13 July 2023.
^ Source for data beginning in 2017: “Renewable Energy Market Update Outlook for 2023 and 2024” (PDF). International Energy Agency. June 2023. p. 19. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 July 2023. IEA. CC BY 4.0. ● Source for data through 2016: “Renewable Energy Market Update / Outlook for 2021 and 2022” (PDF). IEA.org. International Energy Agency. May 2021. p. 8. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 March 2023. IEA. Licence: CC BY 4.0
^ “World Energy Investment 2023 / Overview and key findings”. International Energy Agency (IEA). 25 May 2023. Archived from the original on 31 May 2023. Global energy investment in clean energy and in fossil fuels, 2015-2023 (chart) — From pages 8 and 12 of World Energy Investment 2023 (archive).
^ IEA 2007, p. 3.
^ Santangeli, Andrea; Toivonen, Tuuli; Pouzols, Federico Montesino; Pogson, Mark; Hastings, Astley; Smith, Pete; Moilanen, Atte (September 2016). “Global change synergies and trade-offs between renewable energy and biodiversity”. GCB Bioenergy. 8 (5): 941–951. Bibcode:2016GCBBi…8..941S. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12299. hdl:2164/6138.
^ Rehbein, Jose A.; Watson, James E. M.; Lane, Joe L.; Sonter, Laura J.; Venter, Oscar; Atkinson, Scott C.; Allan, James R. (May 2020). “Renewable energy development threatens many globally important biodiversity areas”. Global Change Biology. 26 (5): 3040–3051. Bibcode:2020GCBio..26.3040R. doi:10.1111/gcb.15067. PMID 32133726.
^ Ritchie, Hannah (2019). “Renewable Energy”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 4 August 2020. Retrieved 31 July 2020.
^ Renewables 2020 Analysis and forecast to 2025 (PDF) (Report). IEA. 2020. p. 12. Archived from the original on 26 April 2021.
^ “Access to electricity”. SDG7: Data and Projections. IEA. 2020. Archived from the original on 13 May 2021. Retrieved 5 May 2021.
^ “Infrastructure Solutions: The power of purchase agreements”. European Investment Bank. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
^ “Renewable Power – Analysis”. IEA. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
^ “Global Electricity Review 2022”. Ember. 29 March 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
^ “Renewable Energy and Electricity | Sustainable Energy | Renewable Energy – World Nuclear Association”. world-nuclear.org. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA (2022), Renewables 2022, IEA, Paris https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2022, License: CC BY 4.0
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 406.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Wind & Solar Share in Electricity Production Data”. Global Energy Statistical Yearbook 2021. Enerdata. Archived from the original on 19 July 2019. Retrieved 13 June 2021.
^ Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 34–35.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Levelized Cost of Energy and of Storage”. Lazard. 19 October 2020. Archived from the original on 25 February 2021. Retrieved 26 February 2021.
^ Victoria, Marta; Haegel, Nancy; Peters, Ian Marius; Sinton, Ron; Jäger-Waldau, Arnulf; del Cañizo, Carlos; Breyer, Christian; Stocks, Matthew; Blakers, Andrew; Kaizuka, Izumi; Komoto, Keiichi; Smets, Arno (May 2021). “Solar photovoltaics is ready to power a sustainable future”. Joule. 5 (5): 1041–1056. Bibcode:2021Joule…5.1041V. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2021.03.005.
^ IRENA 2021, pp. 19, 22.
^ Goetz, Katelyn P.; Taylor, Alexander D.; Hofstetter, Yvonne J.; Vaynzof, Yana (13 January 2021). “Sustainability in Perovskite Solar Cells”. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 13 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1021/acsami.0c17269. PMID 33372760.
^ Xu, Yan; Li, Jinhui; Tan, Quanyin; Peters, Anesia Lauren; Yang, Congren (May 2018). “Global status of recycling waste solar panels: A review”. Waste Management. 75: 450–458. Bibcode:2018WaMan..75..450X. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.01.036. PMID 29472153.
^ Tian, Xueyu; Stranks, Samuel D.; You, Fengqi (31 July 2020). “Life cycle energy use and environmental implications of high-performance perovskite tandem solar cells”. Science Advances. 6 (31): eabb0055. Bibcode:2020SciA….6…55T. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb0055. PMC 7399695. PMID 32789177.
^ Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 35–36.
^ “Solar energy”. International Renewable Energy Agency. Archived from the original on 13 May 2021. Retrieved 5 June 2021.
^ REN21 2020, p. 124.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 366.
^ “What are the advantages and disadvantages of offshore wind farms?”. American Geosciences Institute. 12 May 2016. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
^ Szarka 2007, p. 176.
^ Wang, Shifeng; Wang, Sicong (September 2015). “Impacts of wind energy on environment: A review”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 49: 437–443. Bibcode:2015RSERv..49..437W. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.137.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 215.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 213.
^ Huang, Yu-Fong; Gan, Xing-Jia; Chiueh, Pei-Te (March 2017). “Life cycle assessment and net energy analysis of offshore wind power systems”. Renewable Energy. 102: 98–106. Bibcode:2017REne..102…98H. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2016.10.050.
^ Belton, Padraig (7 February 2020). “What happens to all the old wind turbines?”. BBC. Archived from the original on 23 February 2021. Retrieved 27 February 2021.
^ Smil 2017b, p. 286.
^ REN21 2021, p. 21.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Moran, Emilio F.; Lopez, Maria Claudia; Moore, Nathan; Müller, Norbert; Hyndman, David W. (20 November 2018). “Sustainable hydropower in the 21st century”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115 (47): 11891–11898. Bibcode:2018PNAS..11511891M. doi:10.1073/pnas.1809426115. PMC 6255148. PMID 30397145.
^ Kumar, A.; Schei, T.; Ahenkorah, A.; Caceres Rodriguez, R. et al. “Hydropower“. In IPCC (2011), pp. 451, 462, 488.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Schlömer, S.; Bruckner, T.; Fulton, L.; Hertwich, E. et al. “Annex III: Technology-specific cost and performance parameters“. In IPCC (2014), p. 1335.
^ Almeida, Rafael M.; Shi, Qinru; Gomes-Selman, Jonathan M.; Wu, Xiaojian; Xue, Yexiang; Angarita, Hector; Barros, Nathan; Forsberg, Bruce R.; García-Villacorta, Roosevelt; Hamilton, Stephen K.; Melack, John M.; Montoya, Mariana; Perez, Guillaume; Sethi, Suresh A.; Gomes, Carla P.; Flecker, Alexander S. (19 September 2019). “Reducing greenhouse gas emissions of Amazon hydropower with strategic dam planning”. Nature Communications. 10 (1): 4281. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12179-5. PMC 6753097. PMID 31537792.
^ László, Erika (1981). “Geothermal Energy: An Old Ally”. Ambio. 10 (5): 248–249. JSTOR 4312703.
^ REN21 2020, p. 97.
^ “Geothermal Energy Information and Facts”. National Geographic. 19 October 2009. Archived from the original on 8 August 2021. Retrieved 8 August 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2020). “Energy mix”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 2 July 2021. Retrieved 9 July 2021.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, pp. 222, 228.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, pp. 228–229.
^ “Biomass explained”. US Energy Information Administration. 8 June 2021. Archived from the original on 15 September 2021. Retrieved 13 September 2021.
^ Kopetz, Heinz (7 February 2013). “Build a biomass energy market”. Nature. 494 (7435): 29–31. doi:10.1038/494029a. PMID 23389528.
^ Demirbas, Ayhan (August 2008). “Biofuels sources, biofuel policy, biofuel economy and global biofuel projections”. Energy Conversion and Management. 49 (8): 2106–2116. Bibcode:2008ECM….49.2106D. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2008.02.020.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Correa, Diego F.; Beyer, Hawthorne L.; Fargione, Joseph E.; Hill, Jason D.; Possingham, Hugh P.; Thomas-Hall, Skye R.; Schenk, Peer M. (June 2019). “Towards the implementation of sustainable biofuel production systems”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 107: 250–263. Bibcode:2019RSERv.107..250C. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.005.
^ Daley, Jason (24 April 2018). “The EPA Declared That Burning Wood Is Carbon Neutral. It’s Actually a Lot More Complicated”. Smithsonian Magazine. Archived from the original on 30 June 2021. Retrieved 14 September 2021.
^ Tester et al. 2012, p. 512.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Smil 2017a, p. 162.
^ World Health Organization 2016, p. 73.
^ IPCC 2014, p. 616.
^ “Biofuels explained: Ethanol”. US Energy Information Administration. 18 June 2020. Archived from the original on 14 May 2021. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
^ Foley, Jonathan (5 March 2013). “It’s Time to Rethink America’s Corn System”. Scientific American. Archived from the original on 3 January 2020. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
^ Ayompe, Lacour M.; Schaafsma, M.; Egoh, Benis N. (January 2021). “Towards sustainable palm oil production: The positive and negative impacts on ecosystem services and human wellbeing”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 278: 123914. Bibcode:2021JCPro.27823914A. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123914.
^ Lustgarten, Abrahm (20 November 2018). “Palm Oil Was Supposed to Help Save the Planet. Instead It Unleashed a Catastrophe”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 17 May 2019. Retrieved 15 May 2019.
^ Smil 2017a, p. 161.
^ National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2019, p. 3.
^ REN21 2021, pp. 113–116.
^ “The Role of Gas: Key Findings”. IEA. July 2019. Archived from the original on 1 September 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
^ “Natural gas and the environment”. US Energy Information Administration. Archived from the original on 2 April 2021. Retrieved 28 March 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Storrow, Benjamin. “Methane Leaks Erase Some of the Climate Benefits of Natural Gas”. Scientific American. Retrieved 31 May 2023.
^ Plumer, Brad (26 June 2019). “As Coal Fades in the U.S., Natural Gas Becomes the Climate Battleground”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 23 September 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
^ Gürsan, C.; de Gooyert, V. (March 2021). “The systemic impact of a transition fuel: Does natural gas help or hinder the energy transition?”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 138: 110552. Bibcode:2021RSERv.13810552G. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110552. hdl:2066/228782.
^ Budinis, Sara; Krevor, Samuel; Dowell, Niall Mac; Brandon, Nigel; Hawkes, Adam (November 2018). “An assessment of CCS costs, barriers and potential”. Energy Strategy Reviews. 22: 61–81. Bibcode:2018EneSR..22…61B. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2018.08.003.
^ “Zero-emission carbon capture and storage in power plants using higher capture rates”. IEA. 7 January 2021. Archived from the original on 30 March 2021. Retrieved 14 March 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Ritchie, Hannah (10 February 2020). “What are the safest and cleanest sources of energy?”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 29 November 2020. Retrieved 14 March 2021.
^ Evans, Simon (8 December 2017). “Solar, wind and nuclear have ‘amazingly low’ carbon footprints, study finds”. Carbon Brief. Archived from the original on 16 March 2021. Retrieved 15 March 2021.
^ IPCC 2018, 5.4.1.2.
^ IPCC AR6 WG3 2022, p. 38.
^ “Global Status Report 2024”. Global CCS Institute. pp. 57–58. Retrieved 19 October 2024. The report lists 50 facilities, of which 3 are direct air capture facilities and 3 are transport/storage facilities
^ Roser, Max (10 December 2020). “The world’s energy problem”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 21 July 2021. Retrieved 21 July 2021.
^ Rhodes, Richard (19 July 2018). “Why Nuclear Power Must Be Part of the Energy Solution”. Yale Environment 360. Yale School of the Environment. Archived from the original on 9 August 2021. Retrieved 24 July 2021.
^ “Nuclear Power in the World Today”. World Nuclear Association. June 2021. Archived from the original on 16 July 2021. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
^ Bailey, Ronald (10 May 2023). “New study: Nuclear power is humanity’s greenest energy option”. Reason.com. Retrieved 22 May 2023.
^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2020). “Nuclear Energy”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 20 July 2021. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
^ MacKay 2008, p. 162.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Gill, Matthew; Livens, Francis; Peakman, Aiden (2014). “Nuclear Fission”. Future Energy. pp. 135–149. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102886-5.00007-4. ISBN 978-0-08-102886-5.
^ Muellner, Nikolaus; Arnold, Nikolaus; Gufler, Klaus; Kromp, Wolfgang; Renneberg, Wolfgang; Liebert, Wolfgang (August 2021). “Nuclear energy – The solution to climate change?”. Energy Policy. 155: 112363. Bibcode:2021EnPol.15512363M. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112363.
^ IPCC 2018, 2.4.2.1.
^ Timmer, John (21 November 2020). “Why are nuclear plants so expensive? Safety’s only part of the story”. Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 28 April 2021. Retrieved 17 March 2021.
^ Technical assessment of nuclear energy with respect to the ‘do no significant harm’ criteria of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (‘Taxonomy Regulation’) (PDF) (Report). European Commission Joint Research Centre. 2021. p. 53. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 April 2021.
^ Locatelli, Giorgio; Mignacca, Benito (2020). “Small Modular Nuclear Reactors”. Future Energy. pp. 151–169. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102886-5.00008-6. ISBN 978-0-08-102886-5.
^ McGrath, Matt (6 November 2019). “Nuclear fusion is ‘a question of when, not if'”. BBC. Archived from the original on 25 January 2021. Retrieved 13 February 2021.
^ Amos, Jonathan (9 February 2022). “Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy”. BBC. Archived from the original on 1 March 2022. Retrieved 10 February 2022.
^ “Energy Transition Investment Now On Par with Fossil Fuel”. Bloomberg NEF (New Energy Finance). 10 February 2023. Archived from the original on 27 March 2023.
^ Jaccard 2020, pp. 202–203, Chapter 11 – “Renewables Have Won”.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d IPCC 2014, 7.11.3.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 106–110.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Evans, Simon; Gabbatiss, Josh (30 November 2020). “In-depth Q&A: Does the world need hydrogen to solve climate change?”. Carbon Brief. Archived from the original on 1 December 2020. Retrieved 1 December 2020.
^ Jaccard 2020, p. 203, Chapter 11 – “Renewables Have Won”.
^ “Reaching net zero emissions demands faster innovation, but we’ve already come a long way – Analysis”. International Energy Agency. 13 November 2023. Retrieved 30 April 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA 2021, p. 15.
^ “Innovation – Energy System”. International Energy Agency. Retrieved 30 April 2024.
^ World Health Organization 2018, Executive Summary.
^ Vandyck, T.; Keramidas, K.; Kitous, A.; Spadaro, J.V.; et al. (2018). “Air quality co-benefits for human health and agriculture counterbalance costs to meet Paris Agreement pledges”. Nature Communications. 9 (1): 4939. Bibcode:2018NatCo…9.4939V. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06885-9. PMC 6250710. PMID 30467311.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations Environment Programme 2019, pp. 46–55.
^ IPCC 2018, p. 97.
^ Hopwood, David (May 2007). “Blueprint for sustainability?”. Refocus. 8 (3): 54–57. doi:10.1016/S1471-0846(07)70068-9.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. 47.
^ “Introduction to System Integration of Renewables”. IEA. Archived from the original on 15 May 2020. Retrieved 30 May 2020.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Blanco, Herib; Faaij, André (January 2018). “A review at the role of storage in energy systems with a focus on Power to Gas and long-term storage” (PDF). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 81: 1049–1086. Bibcode:2018RSERv..81.1049B. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.062.
^ REN21 2020, p. 177.
^ Bloess, Andreas; Schill, Wolf-Peter; Zerrahn, Alexander (February 2018). “Power-to-heat for renewable energy integration: A review of technologies, modeling approaches, and flexibility potentials”. Applied Energy. 212: 1611–1626. Bibcode:2018ApEn..212.1611B. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.073. hdl:10419/200120.
^ IEA 2020, p. 109.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Koohi-Fayegh, S.; Rosen, M.A. (February 2020). “A review of energy storage types, applications and recent developments”. Journal of Energy Storage. 27: 101047. Bibcode:2020JEnSt..2701047K. doi:10.1016/j.est.2019.101047.
^ Katz, Cheryl (17 December 2020). “The batteries that could make fossil fuels obsolete”. BBC. Archived from the original on 11 January 2021. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Climate change and batteries: the search for future power storage solutions” (PDF). Climate change: science and solutions. The Royal Society. 19 May 2021. Archived from the original on 16 October 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
^ Hunt, Julian D.; Byers, Edward; Wada, Yoshihide; Parkinson, Simon; Gernaat, David E. H. J.; Langan, Simon; van Vuuren, Detlef P.; Riahi, Keywan (19 February 2020). “Global resource potential of seasonal pumped hydropower storage for energy and water storage”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 947. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11..947H. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14555-y. PMC 7031375. PMID 32075965.
^ Balaraman, Kavya (12 October 2020). “To batteries and beyond: With seasonal storage potential, hydrogen offers ‘a different ballgame entirely'”. Utility Dive. Archived from the original on 18 January 2021. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
^ Cole, Laura (15 November 2020). “How to cut carbon out of your heating”. BBC. Archived from the original on 27 August 2021. Retrieved 31 August 2021.
^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2020). “Electricity Mix”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 13 October 2021. Retrieved 16 October 2021.
^ IPCC 2018, 2.4.2.2.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 167–169.
^ United Nations Development Programme 2016, p. 30.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Herrington, Richard (24 May 2021). “Mining our green future”. Nature Reviews Materials. 6 (6): 456–458. Bibcode:2021NatRM…6..456H. doi:10.1038/s41578-021-00325-9.
^ Mudd, Gavin M. “Metals and Elements Needed to Support Future Energy Systems”. In Letcher (2020), pp. 723–724.
^ Babbitt, Callie W. (August 2020). “Sustainability perspectives on lithium-ion batteries”. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 22 (6): 1213–1214. Bibcode:2020CTEP…22.1213B. doi:10.1007/s10098-020-01890-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c IPCC AR6 WG3 2022, pp. 91–92.
^ Evans, Simon; Gabbatiss, Josh (30 November 2020). “In-depth Q&A: Does the world need hydrogen to solve climate change?”. Carbon Brief. Archived from the original on 1 December 2020. Retrieved 1 December 2020.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Lewis, Alastair C. (10 June 2021). “Optimising air quality co-benefits in a hydrogen economy: a case for hydrogen-specific standards for NO x emissions”. Environmental Science: Atmospheres. 1 (5): 201–207. Bibcode:2021ESAt….1..201L. doi:10.1039/D1EA00037C. This article incorporates text from this source, which is available under the CC BY 3.0 license.
^ Reed, Stanley; Ewing, Jack (13 July 2021). “Hydrogen Is One Answer to Climate Change. Getting It Is the Hard Part”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 14 July 2021. Retrieved 14 July 2021.
^ IRENA 2019, p. 9.
^ Bonheure, Mike; Vandewalle, Laurien A.; Marin, Guy B.; Van Geem, Kevin M. (March 2021). “Dream or Reality? Electrification of the Chemical Process Industries”. CEP Magazine. American Institute of Chemical Engineers. Archived from the original on 17 July 2021. Retrieved 6 July 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Griffiths, Steve; Sovacool, Benjamin K.; Kim, Jinsoo; Bazilian, Morgan; Uratani, Joao M. (October 2021). “Industrial decarbonization via hydrogen: A critical and systematic review of developments, socio-technical systems and policy options”. Energy Research & Social Science. 80: 102208. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102208.
^ Palys, Matthew J.; Daoutidis, Prodromos (May 2020). “Using hydrogen and ammonia for renewable energy storage: A geographically comprehensive techno-economic study”. Computers & Chemical Engineering. 136: 106785. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106785.
^ IRENA 2021, pp. 12, 22.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 15, 75–76.
^ Kjellberg-Motton, Brendan (7 February 2022). “Steel decarbonisation gathers speed | Argus Media”. www.argusmedia.com. Retrieved 7 September 2023.
^ Blank, Thomas; Molly, Patrick (January 2020). “Hydrogen’s Decarbonization Impact for Industry” (PDF). Rocky Mountain Institute. pp. 2, 7, 8. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 September 2020.
^ Plötz, Patrick (31 January 2022). “Hydrogen technology is unlikely to play a major role in sustainable road transport”. Nature Electronics. 5 (1): 8–10. doi:10.1038/s41928-021-00706-6.
^ Fraser, Simon D.S.; Lock, Karen (December 2011). “Cycling for transport and public health: a systematic review of the effect of the environment on cycling”. European Journal of Public Health. 21 (6): 738–743. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckq145. PMID 20929903.
^ “Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data”. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 12 January 2016. Archived from the original on 5 December 2019. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
^ Bigazzi, Alexander (May 2019). “Comparison of marginal and average emission factors for passenger transportation modes”. Applied Energy. 242: 1460–1466. Bibcode:2019ApEn..242.1460B. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.172.
^ Schäfer, Andreas W.; Yeh, Sonia (20 April 2020). “A holistic analysis of passenger travel energy and greenhouse gas intensities”. Nature Sustainability. 3 (6): 459–462. Bibcode:2020NatSu…3..459S. doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0514-9.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2020, p. xxv.
^ IEA 2021, p. 137.
^ Pucher, John; Buehler, Ralph (2 November 2017). “Cycling towards a more sustainable transport future”. Transport Reviews. 37 (6): 689–694. doi:10.1080/01441647.2017.1340234.
^ Smith, John (22 September 2016). “Sustainable transport”. European Commission. Archived from the original on 22 October 2021. Retrieved 22 October 2021.
^ Knobloch, Florian; Hanssen, Steef V.; Lam, Aileen; Pollitt, Hector; Salas, Pablo; Chewpreecha, Unnada; Huijbregts, Mark A. J.; Mercure, Jean-Francois (23 March 2020). “Net emission reductions from electric cars and heat pumps in 59 world regions over time”. Nature Sustainability. 3 (6): 437–447. Bibcode:2020NatSu…3..437K. doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0488-7. PMC 7308170. PMID 32572385.
^ Bogdanov, Dmitrii; Farfan, Javier; Sadovskaia, Kristina; Aghahosseini, Arman; Child, Michael; Gulagi, Ashish; Oyewo, Ayobami Solomon; de Souza Noel Simas Barbosa, Larissa; Breyer, Christian (6 March 2019). “Radical transformation pathway towards sustainable electricity via evolutionary steps”. Nature Communications. 10 (1). doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08855-1. PMC 6403340. PMID 30842423.
^ Martini, Giorgio; Grigoratos, Theodoros (2014). Non-exhaust traffic related emissions – Brake and tyre wear PM. EUR 26648. Publications Office of the European Union. p. 42. ISBN 978-92-79-38303-8. OCLC 1044281650. Archived from the original on 30 July 2021.
^ Non-exhaust Particulate Emissions from Road Transport. 2020. pp. 8–9. doi:10.1787/4a4dc6ca-en. ISBN 978-92-64-45244-2.
^ “CO₂ performance of new passenger cars in Europe”. www.eea.europa.eu. Retrieved 19 October 2022.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 133–137.
^ “Rail and waterborne – best for low-carbon motorised transport”. European Environment Agency. Archived from the original on 9 October 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
^ Miller, Joe (9 September 2020). “Hydrogen takes a back seat to electric for passenger vehicles”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 20 September 2020. Retrieved 9 September 2020.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 136, 139.
^ Biomass in a low-carbon economy (Report). UK Committee on Climate Change. November 2018. p. 18. Archived from the original on 28 December 2019. Retrieved 28 December 2019.
^ “Buildings”. IEA. Archived from the original on 14 October 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
^ Mortensen, Anders Winther; Mathiesen, Brian Vad; Hansen, Anders Bavnhøj; Pedersen, Sigurd Lauge; Grandal, Rune Duban; Wenzel, Henrik (October 2020). “The role of electrification and hydrogen in breaking the biomass bottleneck of the renewable energy system – A study on the Danish energy system”. Applied Energy. 275: 115331. Bibcode:2020ApEn..27515331M. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115331.
^ Knobloch, Florian; Pollitt, Hector; Chewpreecha, Unnada; Daioglou, Vassilis; Mercure, Jean-Francois (February 2019). “Simulating the deep decarbonisation of residential heating for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C”. Energy Efficiency. 12 (2): 521–550. arXiv:1710.11019. Bibcode:2019EnEff..12..521K. doi:10.1007/s12053-018-9710-0.
^ Alva, Guruprasad; Lin, Yaxue; Fang, Guiyin (February 2018). “An overview of thermal energy storage systems”. Energy. 144: 341–378. Bibcode:2018Ene…144..341A. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.037.
^ Plumer, Brad (30 June 2021). “Are ‘Heat Pumps’ the Answer to Heat Waves? Some Cities Think So”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 10 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
^ Abergel, Thibaut (June 2020). “Heat Pumps”. IEA. Archived from the original on 3 March 2021. Retrieved 12 April 2021.
^ Buffa, Simone; Cozzini, Marco; D’Antoni, Matteo; Baratieri, Marco; et al. (2019). “5th generation district heating and cooling systems: A review of existing cases in Europe”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 104: 504–522. Bibcode:2019RSERv.104..504B. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.059.
^ Lund, Henrik; Werner, Sven; Wiltshire, Robin; Svendsen, Svend; et al. (2014). “4th Generation District Heating (4GDH)”. Energy. 68: 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.089. Archived from the original on 7 March 2021. Retrieved 13 June 2021.
^ Abdolhamidi, Shervin (27 September 2018). “An ancient engineering feat that harnessed the wind”. BBC. Archived from the original on 12 August 2021. Retrieved 12 August 2021.
^ “How cities are using nature to keep heatwaves at bay”. United Nations Environment Programme. 22 July 2020. Archived from the original on 11 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Four Things You Should Know About Sustainable Cooling”. World Bank. 23 May 2019. Archived from the original on 11 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
^ Mastrucci, Alessio; Byers, Edward; Pachauri, Shonali; Rao, Narasimha D. (March 2019). “Improving the SDG energy poverty targets: Residential cooling needs in the Global South”. Energy and Buildings. 186: 405–415. Bibcode:2019EneBu.186..405M. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.01.015.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Smith & Pillarisetti 2017, pp. 145–146.
^ “Cooking appliances”. Natural Resources Canada. 16 January 2013. Archived from the original on 30 July 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2021.
^ World Health Organization; International Energy Agency; Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves; United Nations Development Programme; Energising Development; and World Bank (2018). Accelerating SDG 7 Achievement Policy Brief 02: Achieving Universal Access to Clean and Modern Cooking Fuels, Technologies and Services (PDF) (Report). United Nations. p. 3. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 March 2021.
^ World Health Organization 2016, p. 75.
^ IPCC 2014, p. 29.
^ World Health Organization 2016, p. 12.
^ REN21 2020, p. 40.
^ IEA 2020, p. 135.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. 50.
^ Åhman, Max; Nilsson, Lars J.; Johansson, Bengt (4 July 2017). “Global climate policy and deep decarbonization of energy-intensive industries”. Climate Policy. 17 (5): 634–649. Bibcode:2017CliPo..17..634A. doi:10.1080/14693062.2016.1167009.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. xxiii.
^ IEA 2021, p. 186.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c United Nations Environment Programme 2019, pp. 39–45.
^ Jaccard 2020, p. 109, Chapter 6 – We Must Price Carbon Emissions”.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b United Nations Environment Programme 2019, pp. 28–36.
^ Ciucci, M. (February 2020). “Renewable Energy”. European Parliament. Archived from the original on 4 June 2020. Retrieved 3 June 2020.
^ “State Renewable Portfolio Standards and Goals”. National Conference of State Legislators. 17 April 2020. Archived from the original on 3 June 2020. Retrieved 3 June 2020.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 14–25.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 184–187.
^ IEA 2021, p. 16.
^ Jaccard 2020, pp. 106–109, Chapter 6 – “We Must Price Carbon Emissions”.
^ Plumer, Brad (8 October 2018). “New U.N. Climate Report Says Put a High Price on Carbon”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 27 September 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
^ Green, Jessica F (April 2021). “Does carbon pricing reduce emissions? A review of ex-post analyses”. Environmental Research Letters. 16 (4): 043004. Bibcode:2021ERL….16d3004G. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abdae9.
^ IPCC 2018, 2.5.2.1.
^ State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2019 (PDF) (Report). World Bank. June 2019. pp. 8–11. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1435-8. hdl:10986/29687. ISBN 978-1-4648-1435-8. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 May 2020.
^ “Revenue-Neutral Carbon Tax | Canada”. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Archived from the original on 28 October 2019. Retrieved 28 October 2019.
^ Carr, Mathew (10 October 2018). “How High Does Carbon Need to Be? Somewhere From $20–$27,000”. Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 5 August 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
^ “EAC launches new inquiry weighing up carbon border tax measures”. UK Parliament. 24 September 2021. Archived from the original on 24 September 2021. Retrieved 14 October 2021.
^ Plumer, Brad (14 July 2021). “Europe Is Proposing a Border Carbon Tax. What Is It and How Will It Work?”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 10 September 2021. Retrieved 10 September 2021.
^ Bharti, Bianca (12 August 2021). “Taxing imports of heavy carbon emitters is gaining momentum – and it could hurt Canadian industry: Report”. Financial Post. Archived from the original on 3 October 2021. Retrieved 3 October 2021.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2020, p. vii.
^ IEA 2021, p. 13.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 14–18.
^ IRENA, IEA & REN21 2018, p. 19.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “24 million jobs to open up in the green economy”. International Labour Organization. 14 May 2018. Archived from the original on 2 June 2021. Retrieved 30 May 2021.
^ Catsaros, Oktavia (26 January 2023). “Global Low-Carbon Energy Technology Investment Surges Past $1 Trillion for the First Time”. Bloomberg NEF (New Energy Finance). Figure 1. Archived from the original on 22 May 2023. Defying supply chain disruptions and macroeconomic headwinds, 2022 energy transition investment jumped 31% to draw level with fossil fuels
^ “Global Clean Energy Investment Jumps 17%, Hits $1.8 Trillion in 2023, According to BloombergNEF Report”. BNEF.com. Bloomberg NEF. 30 January 2024. Archived from the original on 28 June 2024. Start years differ by sector but all sectors are present from 2020 onwards.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b 2024 data: “Energy Transition Investment Trends 2025 / Abridged report” (PDF). BloombergNEF. 30 January 2025. p. 9. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 February 2025.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Mazzucato, Mariana; Semieniuk, Gregor (February 2018). “Financing renewable energy: Who is financing what and why it matters”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 127: 8–22. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.021.
^ United Nations Development Programme & United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2019, p. 24.
^ IPCC 2018, p. 96.
^ IEA, IRENA, United Nations Statistics Division, World Bank, World Health Organization 2021, pp. 129, 132.
^ United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2018, p. 54.
^ United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2018, p. 9.
^ Roberts, J. Timmons; Weikmans, Romain; Robinson, Stacy-ann; Ciplet, David; Khan, Mizan; Falzon, Danielle (March 2021). “Rebooting a failed promise of climate finance”. Nature Climate Change. 11 (3): 180–182. Bibcode:2021NatCC..11..180R. doi:10.1038/s41558-021-00990-2.
^ Radwanski, Adam (29 September 2021). “Opinion: As pivotal climate summit approaches, Canada at centre of efforts to repair broken trust among poorer countries”. The Globe and Mail. Archived from the original on 30 September 2021. Retrieved 30 September 2021.
^ “Here are the clean energy innovations that will beat climate change”. European Investment Bank. Retrieved 26 September 2022.
^ “Home”. www.oecd-ilibrary.org. Retrieved 19 October 2022.
^ Bridle, Richard; Sharma, Shruti; Mostafa, Mostafa; Geddes, Anna (June 2019). “Fossil Fuel to Clean Energy Subsidy Swaps: How to pay for an energy revolution” (PDF). International Institute for Sustainable Development. p. iv. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 November 2019.
^ Watts, Nick; Amann, Markus; Arnell, Nigel; Ayeb-Karlsson, Sonja; Belesova, Kristine; Boykoff, Maxwell; Byass, Peter; Cai, Wenjia; Campbell-Lendrum, Diarmid; Capstick, Stuart; Chambers, Jonathan; Dalin, Carole; Daly, Meaghan; Dasandi, Niheer; Davies, Michael; Drummond, Paul; Dubrow, Robert; Ebi, Kristie L; Eckelman, Matthew; Ekins, Paul; Escobar, Luis E; Fernandez Montoya, Lucia; Georgeson, Lucien; Graham, Hilary; Haggar, Paul; Hamilton, Ian; Hartinger, Stella; Hess, Jeremy; Kelman, Ilan; Kiesewetter, Gregor; Kjellstrom, Tord; Kniveton, Dominic; Lemke, Bruno; Liu, Yang; Lott, Melissa; Lowe, Rachel; Sewe, Maquins Odhiambo; Martinez-Urtaza, Jaime; Maslin, Mark; McAllister, Lucy; McGushin, Alice; Jankin Mikhaylov, Slava; Milner, James; Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar; Morrissey, Karyn; Murray, Kris; Munzert, Simon; Nilsson, Maria; Neville, Tara; Oreszczyn, Tadj; Owfi, Fereidoon; Pearman, Olivia; Pencheon, David; Phung, Dung; Pye, Steve; Quinn, Ruth; Rabbaniha, Mahnaz; Robinson, Elizabeth; Rocklöv, Joacim; Semenza, Jan C; Sherman, Jodi; Shumake-Guillemot, Joy; Tabatabaei, Meisam; Taylor, Jonathon; Trinanes, Joaquin; Wilkinson, Paul; Costello, Anthony; Gong, Peng; Montgomery, Hugh (November 2019). “The 2019 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: ensuring that the health of a child born today is not defined by a changing climate”. The Lancet. 394 (10211): 1836–1878. Bibcode:2019Lanc..394.1836W. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32596-6. PMC 7616843. PMID 31733928.
^ United Nations Development Programme 2020, p. 10.
^ Kuzemko, Caroline; Bradshaw, Michael; Bridge, Gavin; Goldthau, Andreas; Jewell, Jessica; Overland, Indra; Scholten, Daniel; Van de Graaf, Thijs; Westphal, Kirsten (October 2020). “Covid-19 and the politics of sustainable energy transitions”. Energy Research & Social Science. 68: 101685. Bibcode:2020ERSS…6801685K. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101685. PMC 7330551. PMID 32839704.
^ IRENA 2021, p. 5.