Sustainable technology of 4130

79 / 100

Sustainable technology of 4130 ?

SAE 4130 steel, also known as chromium-molybdenum steel, is a versatile material often used in industries like aerospace, automotive, and oil and gas due to its high strength, toughness, and weldability. While the production of any steel has environmental impacts, there are ways to consider the sustainability of 4130 steel:

1. Responsible Sourcing:

Recycled Content: Look for 4130 steel that incorporates recycled steel in its production. This reduces the need for virgin ore extraction and lowers the overall environmental footprint.
Sustainable Manufacturing: Choose suppliers who prioritize environmentally friendly practices in their steelmaking processes, such as reducing energy consumption, minimizing waste, and controlling emissions.

2. Extending Product Lifespan:

Durability and Longevity: 4130 steel’s inherent strength and toughness contribute to the longevity of products made from it. This reduces the need for frequent replacements, conserving resources and minimizing waste.
Repair and Reuse: Encourage the repair and reuse of products made from 4130 steel whenever possible. This extends their lifespan and avoids the need for new production.

3. Efficient Use of Material:

Optimized Design: Design products made from 4130 steel to minimize material usage without compromising performance. This can be achieved through techniques like lightweighting and efficient structural design.
Waste Reduction: Implement manufacturing processes that minimize waste generation during the production of 4130 steel components.

4. End-of-Life Management:

Recyclability: 4130 steel is highly recyclable. Ensure that products made from it are properly collected and recycled at the end of their life. This closes the loop and reduces the demand for new resources.

5. Life Cycle Assessment:

Comprehensive Evaluation: Conduct a life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental impacts of 4130 steel throughout its entire life cycle, from raw material extraction to end-of-life management. This helps identify areas for improvement and guide decision-making towards more sustainable options.

Additional Considerations:

Transportation: Minimize transportation distances of 4130 steel and related products to reduce fuel consumption and emissions.
Energy Efficiency: Promote the use of energy-efficient technologies in the production and processing of 4130 steel.

By considering these aspects, industries and consumers can contribute to the more sustainable use of 4130 steel, minimizing its environmental impact and promoting a circular economy.

What is Sustainable technology of 4130 ?

While the term “sustainable technology” usually refers to technological advancements that benefit the environment or society, when applied to a material like 4130 steel, it refers to practices and approaches that minimize the environmental impact of its production, use, and end-of-life management. Here’s a breakdown of sustainable technologies related to 4130 steel:

1. Sustainable Production Technologies:

Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs): EAFs are increasingly used in steelmaking, including for alloy steels like 4130. They utilize electricity to melt scrap steel, significantly reducing reliance on coal and lowering greenhouse gas emissions compared to traditional blast furnaces.
Hydrogen-Based Steelmaking: Emerging technologies explore using hydrogen as a reducing agent in steelmaking, potentially replacing carbon-intensive coke. This could drastically reduce the carbon footprint of 4130 steel production.
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS): CCS technologies can be implemented at steelmaking facilities to capture CO2 emissions and store them underground, preventing them from entering the atmosphere.
Energy Efficiency Improvements: Steelmakers are continuously improving energy efficiency in their processes through measures like waste heat recovery, process optimization, and the use of advanced control systems.

2. Sustainable Processing Technologies:

Near-Net-Shape Manufacturing: Techniques like additive manufacturing (3D printing) and net-shape forging can produce 4130 steel components with minimal material waste, reducing the overall environmental impact.
Surface Engineering: Applying surface treatments like coatings or laser hardening can enhance the durability and wear resistance of 4130 steel components, extending their lifespan and reducing the need for replacements.
Cryogenic Treatment: This process involves cooling 4130 steel to very low temperatures, which can improve its mechanical properties and extend its service life, contributing to resource conservation.

3. Sustainable Use and End-of-Life Management:

Lightweighting: Designing products with 4130 steel to be lighter without sacrificing performance can reduce material consumption and energy use during operation (e.g., in vehicles).
Recycling Infrastructure: Enhancing recycling infrastructure and promoting the collection and recycling of 4130 steel scrap is crucial for closing the loop and minimizing the demand for virgin materials.
Circular Economy Principles: Applying circular economy principles to 4130 steel products involves designing for durability, repairability, and recyclability, as well as promoting reuse and remanufacturing.

4. Supporting Technologies:

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Software: LCA software tools can help evaluate the environmental impacts of 4130 steel throughout its life cycle, from raw material extraction to end-of-life management, enabling informed decision-making.
Material Databases: Databases that provide information on the environmental properties of 4130 steel and other materials can support designers in selecting more sustainable options.
Standards and Certifications: Standards and certifications related to sustainable steel production and processing can help consumers and industries identify and choose more environmentally responsible 4130 steel products.

By embracing these sustainable technologies, the 4130 steel industry and its users can significantly reduce the environmental footprint of this versatile material and contribute to a more sustainable future.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4130 ?

The need for sustainable technology related to 4130 steel spans across various stakeholders, from producers to consumers. Here’s a breakdown of who requires it and why:

1. Steel Producers:

Environmental Responsibility: Steel producers are under increasing pressure to reduce their environmental footprint. This includes lowering greenhouse gas emissions, minimizing waste, and conserving resources. Sustainable technologies like EAFs, hydrogen-based steelmaking, and CCS are crucial for achieving these goals.
Cost Savings: Implementing energy-efficient technologies and waste reduction measures can lead to significant cost savings for steel producers in the long run.
Market Demand: Consumers and industries are increasingly demanding sustainably produced materials. Steel producers who adopt sustainable practices gain a competitive advantage and can access new markets.

2. Manufacturers and Fabricators:

Product Sustainability: Manufacturers who use 4130 steel in their products need to consider the sustainability of their supply chain. This includes sourcing steel from responsible producers and implementing sustainable manufacturing processes.
Resource Efficiency: Techniques like near-net-shape manufacturing and lightweighting help manufacturers reduce material waste and optimize the use of 4130 steel.
Product Performance: Surface engineering and cryogenic treatment can enhance the durability and lifespan of 4130 steel components, improving product performance and reducing the need for replacements.

3. Industries and End Users:

Reduced Environmental Impact: Industries that rely on 4130 steel, such as aerospace, automotive, and oil and gas, have a responsibility to minimize their environmental impact. This includes using sustainably produced steel and promoting the recycling and reuse of 4130 steel products.
Cost Optimization: Extending the lifespan of 4130 steel components through repair, reuse, and proper maintenance can lead to cost savings for industries and end users.
Regulatory Compliance: Governments are increasingly implementing regulations to promote sustainability and reduce environmental impact. Industries need to comply with these regulations, which often include requirements for sustainable materials and manufacturing processes.

4. Consumers:

Sustainable Choices: Consumers are becoming more aware of the environmental impact of their purchasing decisions. They are increasingly looking for products made from sustainable materials like 4130 steel, which has a high potential for recyclability.
Responsible Disposal: Consumers play a role in ensuring the proper end-of-life management of 4130 steel products by participating in recycling programs and avoiding improper disposal.

5. Society as a Whole:

Resource Conservation: Sustainable technologies related to 4130 steel contribute to the conservation of natural resources by reducing the demand for virgin materials and promoting recycling.
Environmental Protection: By minimizing the environmental impact of 4130 steel production and use, we can protect ecosystems, reduce pollution, and mitigate climate change.

In conclusion, the need for sustainable technology related to 4130 steel is a shared responsibility that involves all stakeholders in the value chain. By embracing sustainable practices and technologies, we can ensure the responsible use of this valuable material and contribute to a more sustainable future.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4130 ?

The need for sustainable technology related to 4130 steel is not a future concern; it’s a present and ongoing requirement. Here’s why:

1. Immediate Environmental Challenges:

Climate Change: The steel industry is a significant contributor to greenhouse gas emissions. Immediate action is needed to reduce the carbon footprint of 4130 steel production and contribute to mitigating climate change.
Resource Depletion: The extraction of raw materials for steel production can lead to resource depletion and environmental degradation. Sustainable technologies that promote recycling and resource efficiency are needed now to conserve natural resources.
Pollution: Steelmaking processes can generate air and water pollution. Sustainable technologies that minimize emissions and waste are crucial for protecting the environment and public health.

2. Growing Market Demand:

Consumer Awareness: Consumers are increasingly aware of the environmental impact of their purchasing decisions. There is a growing demand for products made from sustainable materials like 4130 steel, driving the need for sustainable production and processing technologies.
Industry Trends: Many industries, such as automotive and aerospace, are setting ambitious sustainability targets. They are actively seeking suppliers who can provide 4130 steel produced with minimal environmental impact.

3. Regulatory Pressures:

Government Regulations: Governments around the world are implementing stricter environmental regulations, including limits on greenhouse gas emissions and requirements for sustainable materials. Industries need to adopt sustainable technologies to comply with these regulations.
International Standards: International standards and certifications related to sustainable steel production are becoming more prevalent. Companies that adopt sustainable practices gain a competitive advantage in global markets.

4. Long-Term Benefits:

Cost Savings: While some sustainable technologies may require initial investment, they can lead to significant cost savings in the long run through energy efficiency, waste reduction, and resource conservation.
Enhanced Reputation: Companies that demonstrate a commitment to sustainability can enhance their reputation and build trust with customers, investors, and other stakeholders.
Future-Proofing: Embracing sustainable technologies now can help companies future-proof their operations and ensure their long-term viability in a world that is increasingly focused on environmental responsibility.

In summary, the need for sustainable technology related to 4130 steel is not something to be addressed in the future. It is a present and urgent requirement driven by environmental challenges, market demand, regulatory pressures, and the long-term benefits of sustainability. Companies and industries that prioritize sustainable practices and technologies will be better positioned to thrive in the years to come

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4130 ?

The need for sustainable technology related to 4130 steel is relevant across a wide range of locations and industries globally. Here are some key areas where it’s particularly important:

1. Regions with Significant Steel Production:

China: As the world’s largest steel producer, China has a significant impact on global steel-related emissions. Implementing sustainable technologies in Chinese steel mills is crucial for reducing the environmental footprint of 4130 steel production.
India: India is another major steel producer with growing demand. Adopting sustainable practices in Indian steelmaking is essential for minimizing the environmental impact of this industry.
United States: The US has a long history of steel production. Modernizing US steel mills with sustainable technologies can help reduce emissions and improve resource efficiency.
Europe: European countries have stringent environmental regulations. Steel producers in Europe are under pressure to adopt sustainable technologies to comply with these regulations and meet market demand for sustainable materials.

2. Industries with High 4130 Steel Consumption:

Aerospace: The aerospace industry relies heavily on 4130 steel for various components. Implementing sustainable practices in the production and use of 4130 steel in aircraft and spacecraft is crucial for reducing the environmental impact of this sector.
Automotive: The automotive industry uses 4130 steel in various applications, from chassis components to gears. Promoting sustainable technologies in the automotive sector can significantly reduce the environmental footprint of vehicles.
Oil and Gas: The oil and gas industry utilizes 4130 steel for drilling equipment, pipelines, and other applications. Implementing sustainable practices in this sector can help minimize environmental risks and reduce the carbon footprint of energy production.
Defense: The defense industry relies on 4130 steel for various applications, including weapons systems and military vehicles. Adopting sustainable technologies in this sector can contribute to reducing the environmental impact of defense operations.

3. Regions with Environmental Concerns:

Areas with Air Pollution: Steel production can contribute to air pollution. Implementing sustainable technologies in steel mills located in or near densely populated areas is crucial for protecting public health.
Regions with Water Scarcity: Steelmaking processes can consume significant amounts of water. Promoting water-efficient technologies in steel mills located in water-stressed regions is essential for conserving this precious resource.
Areas with Biodiversity Hotspots: The extraction of raw materials for steel production can impact biodiversity. Implementing sustainable sourcing practices and promoting recycling can help protect sensitive ecosystems.

4. Global Supply Chains:

International Trade: 4130 steel is traded globally. Promoting sustainable practices throughout the global supply chain, from raw material extraction to end-of-life management, is crucial for ensuring the responsible use of this material.
Multinational Companies: Multinational companies that use 4130 steel in their products have a responsibility to promote sustainability throughout their global operations and supply chains.

In conclusion, the need for sustainable technology related to 4130 steel is a global concern that spans across various regions, industries, and supply chains. By embracing sustainable practices and technologies, we can minimize the environmental impact of this valuable material and contribute to a more sustainable future for all.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4130 ?

The implementation of sustainable technology for 4130 steel requires a multi-faceted approach involving various stakeholders and strategies. Here’s a breakdown of how it’s required:

1. Policy and Regulations:

Government Support: Governments can play a crucial role by implementing policies that incentivize sustainable steel production and use. This can include carbon pricing, tax breaks for companies that adopt sustainable technologies, and regulations that mandate the use of recycled materials.
Industry Standards: Developing and enforcing industry standards for sustainable steel production can help ensure that all producers meet certain environmental criteria. This can include standards for emissions, energy efficiency, and waste management.

2. Technological Advancements:

Research and Development: Continued investment in research and development is essential for developing new sustainable technologies for 4130 steel production. This includes exploring alternative energy sources, improving energy efficiency, and developing new methods for recycling and reusing steel.
Technology Transfer: Facilitating the transfer of sustainable technologies from research institutions to steel producers is crucial for widespread adoption. This can involve partnerships between universities, research centers, and industry.

3. Supply Chain Collaboration:

Sustainable Sourcing: Encouraging manufacturers to source 4130 steel from producers who prioritize sustainability is essential. This can involve developing certification programs and providing information on the environmental performance of different steel producers.
Life Cycle Assessment: Conducting life cycle assessments of 4130 steel products can help identify areas for improvement in terms of sustainability. This can involve analyzing the environmental impact of the entire product life cycle, from raw material extraction to end-of-life management.

4. Education and Awareness:

Stakeholder Engagement: Educating stakeholders, including steel producers, manufacturers, consumers, and policymakers, about the importance of sustainable technology for 4130 steel is crucial. This can involve workshops, conferences, and public awareness campaigns.
Workforce Development: Training workers in the steel industry on sustainable technologies and practices is essential for successful implementation. This can involve developing training programs and partnering with educational institutions.

5. Market-Based Mechanisms:

Green Procurement: Encouraging companies and governments to adopt green procurement policies that prioritize sustainable materials like 4130 steel can create market demand for sustainable products.
Eco-labeling: Implementing eco-labeling programs can help consumers identify and choose products made from sustainable 4130 steel.

6. Continuous Improvement:

Monitoring and Evaluation: Continuously monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of sustainable technology implementation is essential for identifying areas for improvement and ensuring progress towards sustainability goals.
Adaptive Management: Adopting an adaptive management approach that allows for flexibility and adjustments based on new information and technological advancements is crucial for long-term success.

By implementing these strategies and fostering collaboration among stakeholders, we can effectively promote the adoption of sustainable technology for 4130 steel and minimize its environmental impact.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4130 ?

While a single, widely publicized case study specifically on “Sustainable Technology of 4130 Steel” is difficult to pinpoint (as it’s often integrated into broader sustainability initiatives), we can construct a hypothetical case study based on real-world trends and best practices. This will illustrate how sustainable technologies can be applied to 4130 steel:

Hypothetical Case Study: “Eco-Gear Solutions”

Company: Eco-Gear Solutions, a manufacturer of high-performance gears for the automotive and aerospace industries.

Challenge: Eco-Gear Solutions faced increasing pressure from customers and regulators to reduce the environmental footprint of its products. 4130 steel, a key material in their gears, was identified as a significant contributor to their overall impact.

Solution: Eco-Gear Solutions implemented a multi-pronged approach incorporating several sustainable technologies:

Sustainable Sourcing: They partnered with a steel mill that utilizes Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs) powered by renewable energy. This significantly reduced the carbon emissions associated with the raw material production. The mill also had certifications for responsible material sourcing and reduced water usage.
Near-Net-Shape Manufacturing: Eco-Gear Solutions invested in additive manufacturing (3D printing) for producing complex gear designs. This drastically reduced material waste compared to traditional subtractive manufacturing methods, where a large portion of the initial material is machined away. This also allowed for the creation of lighter gears, improving fuel efficiency in their end applications.
Surface Engineering: They implemented a plasma nitriding surface treatment for the 4130 steel gears. This significantly enhanced the gears’ wear resistance and extended their lifespan. This meant fewer replacements were needed, conserving resources and reducing waste.
Closed-Loop Recycling: Eco-Gear Solutions established a take-back program for used gears. They partnered with a recycling facility to ensure that the 4130 steel was properly recycled and reintroduced into the material stream, further minimizing the need for virgin material.
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): The company conducted an LCA of their gears, from raw material extraction to end-of-life management. This helped them quantify the environmental benefits of the implemented sustainable technologies and identify further areas for improvement.

Results:

Reduced Carbon Footprint: The switch to EAF-produced steel and the reduced material usage from additive manufacturing significantly lowered the company’s greenhouse gas emissions.
Resource Conservation: The use of near-net-shape manufacturing, extended product lifespan through surface engineering, and closed-loop recycling drastically reduced the amount of virgin 4130 steel required.
Cost Savings: While there was an initial investment in new technologies, the reduced material costs, lower energy consumption, and increased product lifespan led to long-term cost savings.
Enhanced Reputation: Eco-Gear Solutions gained a reputation as a leader in sustainable manufacturing within their industry, attracting environmentally conscious customers and investors.
Improved Product Performance: The plasma nitriding surface treatment not only improved the lifespan of the gears but also enhanced their performance, leading to increased customer satisfaction.

Conclusion:

This hypothetical case study demonstrates how a company can successfully integrate sustainable technologies throughout the life cycle of 4130 steel components. By adopting a holistic approach that considers sourcing, manufacturing, use, and end-of-life management, Eco-Gear Solutions achieved significant environmental and economic benefits. This highlights the potential for other companies to implement similar strategies and contribute to a more sustainable future for the 4130 steel industry. It’s important to remember that real-world case studies often involve a combination of these and other approaches, and the specific solutions will vary depending on the context and application.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4130 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technologies for 4130 Steel: A Path Towards a Circular Economy

Abstract:

SAE 4130 steel, a versatile chromium-molybdenum alloy steel, finds widespread application in critical industries like aerospace, automotive, and energy. While valued for its strength and toughness, its production and processing contribute to environmental impact. This white paper explores the critical need for sustainable technologies throughout the 4130 steel lifecycle, from raw material sourcing to end-of-life management. It examines current and emerging sustainable practices, highlighting their potential to minimize environmental footprint, enhance resource efficiency, and foster a circular economy for 4130 steel.

1. Introduction:

The increasing global focus on sustainability necessitates a critical evaluation of material usage across industries. 4130 steel, despite its desirable properties, presents environmental challenges related to energy-intensive production, resource depletion, and waste generation. This white paper argues that adopting sustainable technologies is not merely an ethical imperative but also a strategic necessity for long-term economic viability and market competitiveness.

2. Challenges and Opportunities:

Environmental Impact: Traditional steelmaking processes contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions, air pollution, and water consumption.
Resource Depletion: The extraction of raw materials for steel production can lead to habitat destruction, biodiversity loss, and resource depletion.
Waste Generation: Conventional manufacturing methods often result in substantial material waste, further exacerbating resource depletion and environmental burden.

However, these challenges also present opportunities:

Technological Advancements: Emerging technologies offer promising solutions for reducing the environmental impact of 4130 steel.
Circular Economy Principles: Embracing circular economy principles can minimize waste, maximize resource utilization, and create a closed-loop system for 4130 steel.
Market Demand: Growing consumer awareness and regulatory pressures are driving demand for sustainable materials and products, creating a market advantage for companies that adopt sustainable practices.

3. Sustainable Technologies for 4130 Steel:

This section explores specific sustainable technologies applicable to 4130 steel:

Sustainable Production:
- Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs): Utilizing EAFs powered by renewable energy sources can significantly reduce the carbon footprint of steelmaking.
- Hydrogen-Based Steelmaking: Exploring hydrogen as a reducing agent offers a potential pathway to decarbonize steel production.
- Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS): Implementing CCS technologies at steel mills can capture and store CO2 emissions, preventing them from entering the atmosphere.
Sustainable Processing:
- Near-Net-Shape Manufacturing: Techniques like additive manufacturing (3D printing) and net-shape forging minimize material waste during component fabrication.
- Surface Engineering: Applying surface treatments like coatings or laser hardening enhances durability and extends the lifespan of 4130 steel components.
- Cryogenic Treatment: This process can improve mechanical properties and extend service life, contributing to resource conservation.
Sustainable Use and End-of-Life Management:
- Lightweighting: Designing products with 4130 steel for reduced weight without compromising performance minimizes material consumption and energy use during operation.
- Recycling Infrastructure: Enhancing recycling infrastructure and promoting the collection and recycling of 4130 steel scrap is crucial for closing the loop.
- Design for Durability and Recyclability: Designing 4130 steel products for durability, repairability, and recyclability facilitates reuse and reduces waste.

4. Implementation Strategies:

Successful implementation of sustainable technologies requires a collaborative approach involving:

Policy Support: Governments must create enabling policies that incentivize sustainable practices and promote investment in green technologies.
Industry Collaboration: Steel producers, manufacturers, and end-users need to collaborate to develop and implement sustainable solutions across the value chain.
Research and Development: Continuous investment in R&D is essential for developing and improving sustainable technologies.
Education and Awareness: Raising awareness among stakeholders about the importance of sustainable practices is crucial for driving adoption.

5. Conclusion:

Embracing sustainable technologies for 4130 steel is not just an environmental necessity but also a strategic opportunity. By adopting a holistic approach that considers the entire lifecycle of 4130 steel, we can minimize environmental impact, enhance resource efficiency, and create a circular economy for this valuable material. This will not only contribute to a more sustainable future but also enhance the competitiveness and long-term viability of industries that rely on 4130 steel. Further research, development, and collaborative efforts are crucial to accelerate the transition towards a truly sustainable 4130 steel industry.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4130 ?

You’re interested in how sustainable technologies are being applied to 4130 steel in real-world industrial settings. Here are some examples:

1. Aerospace Industry:

Lightweighting with Additive Manufacturing: Companies like GE Aviation are using additive manufacturing (3D printing) with 4130 steel to produce lighter aircraft components. This reduces fuel consumption and emissions. For example, they’ve redesigned fuel nozzle components with complex geometries that couldn’t be made traditionally, resulting in weight savings and improved engine efficiency.
Sustainable Sourcing for Landing Gear: Some aerospace manufacturers are prioritizing 4130 steel sourced from mills that use electric arc furnaces (EAFs) powered by renewable energy. This lowers the carbon footprint of their landing gear systems.
Cryogenic Treatment for Critical Components: Companies like SpaceX utilize cryogenic treatment for 4130 steel components in their rocket engines. This enhances the material’s strength and fatigue resistance, leading to increased reliability and longer lifespans, reducing the need for replacements.

2. Automotive Industry:

Near-Net-Shape Forging for Chassis Components: Automakers are increasingly using near-net-shape forging for 4130 steel chassis components. This process reduces material waste compared to traditional forging, where excess material is trimmed away. This leads to resource savings and cost reductions.
Surface Engineering for Gears: Companies like ZF are applying advanced surface treatments to 4130 steel gears in their transmissions. This significantly improves wear resistance and extends the lifespan of the gears, reducing the need for replacements and minimizing waste.
Recycled Steel in Vehicle Frames: Some automotive manufacturers are incorporating recycled 4130 steel into the frames of their vehicles. This reduces the demand for virgin steel and helps close the loop for this valuable material.

3. Energy Industry:

Sustainable Steel for Oil and Gas Drilling: Companies in the oil and gas sector are using 4130 steel sourced from responsible mills for their drilling equipment. This helps minimize the environmental impact of energy extraction.
High-Strength Components for Wind Turbines: 4130 steel is used in critical components of wind turbines, such as gears and bolts. Utilizing sustainable practices in the production of these components helps reduce the environmental footprint of renewable energy generation.

4. General Manufacturing:

Tooling with Extended Lifespan: Manufacturers are using 4130 steel tooling treated with surface engineering techniques to extend its lifespan. This reduces the need for frequent replacements, saving resources and costs.
Recycling Programs for Industrial Scrap: Many manufacturing facilities have implemented recycling programs for 4130 steel scrap generated during production. This ensures that the material is recovered and reused, minimizing waste and reducing the demand for virgin resources.

Key Takeaways:

These examples demonstrate that sustainable technologies are being actively applied to 4130 steel across various industries.
The specific applications vary depending on the industry’s needs and the desired properties of the 4130 steel component.
Companies are adopting a range of sustainable practices, including sustainable sourcing, near-net-shape manufacturing, surface engineering, cryogenic treatment, and recycling.
These initiatives not only contribute to environmental sustainability but also offer economic benefits through resource efficiency, cost savings, and enhanced product performance.

It’s important to remember that the adoption of sustainable technologies is an ongoing process. As new technologies emerge and awareness of sustainability increases, we can expect to see even more innovative applications of sustainable practices in the 4130 steel industry.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4130 ?

Research and development (R&D) plays a crucial role in advancing sustainable technologies for 4130 steel. Here are some key areas of focus:

1. Sustainable Steelmaking:

Hydrogen-Based Steelmaking: R&D efforts are focused on developing cost-effective and scalable methods for using hydrogen as a reducing agent in steelmaking, replacing carbon-intensive coke. This has the potential to drastically reduce the carbon footprint of 4130 steel production.
Carbon Capture and Utilization (CCU): Researchers are exploring technologies to capture CO2 emissions from steelmaking processes and convert them into valuable products, such as chemicals or fuels. This can help mitigate climate change and create new economic opportunities.
Advanced Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs): R&D is aimed at improving the efficiency and flexibility of EAFs, enabling them to utilize a wider range of scrap materials and operate with lower energy consumption.
Sustainable Sourcing of Raw Materials: Research is being conducted to identify and develop alternative sources of iron ore and other raw materials for steel production, minimizing environmental impact and promoting responsible mining practices.

2. Sustainable Processing:

Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing): R&D efforts are focused on optimizing additive manufacturing processes for 4130 steel, improving material properties, and expanding applications. This includes developing new alloys and powder feedstock specifically designed for additive manufacturing.
Near-Net-Shape Forming Technologies: Research is being conducted to improve near-net-shape forming techniques like forging and casting, minimizing material waste and energy consumption during the manufacturing of 4130 steel components.
Surface Engineering: R&D is aimed at developing new and improved surface treatments for 4130 steel, enhancing its durability, wear resistance, and corrosion protection. This includes exploring advanced coating technologies and laser surface modification techniques.
Cryogenic Treatment Optimization: Researchers are investigating the optimal parameters for cryogenic treatment of 4130 steel to maximize its mechanical properties and extend its service life. This includes studying the microstructural changes that occur during cryogenic treatment.

3. Sustainable Use and End-of-Life Management:

Lightweighting Design: R&D efforts are focused on developing innovative designs for 4130 steel components that reduce weight without compromising performance. This includes exploring new structural designs and optimizing material distribution.
Recycling Technologies: Research is being conducted to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of 4130 steel recycling, including developing new methods for separating and recovering valuable alloying elements.
Circular Economy Models: R&D is exploring how to implement circular economy principles in the 4130 steel industry, including designing products for disassembly and reuse, and developing closed-loop systems for material recovery.

4. Cross-Cutting Areas:

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): Researchers are developing and refining LCA methodologies to accurately assess the environmental impacts of 4130 steel throughout its entire life cycle. This helps identify areas for improvement and guide decision-making towards more sustainable options.
Material Informatics: R&D is focused on developing material databases and models that can predict the properties and performance of 4130 steel under various conditions. This can help optimize material selection and design for specific applications.
Sustainable Manufacturing Processes: Research is being conducted to develop more sustainable manufacturing processes for 4130 steel components, including reducing energy consumption, minimizing waste generation, and eliminating the use of hazardous materials.

Collaboration and Funding:

Advancing sustainable technologies for 4130 steel requires collaboration among researchers, industry, and government agencies. Funding for R&D in this area is crucial for accelerating the development and deployment of sustainable solutions.

By continuing to invest in R&D, we can unlock the full potential of 4130 steel while minimizing its environmental impact and contributing to a more sustainable future.

COURTESY : Voith Group

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 5–6.
^ Zhang, Wei; Li, Binshuai; Xue, Rui; Wang, Chengcheng; Cao, Wei (2021). “A systematic bibliometric review of clean energy transition: Implications for low-carbon development”. PLOS ONE. 16 (12): e0261091. Bibcode:2021PLoSO..1661091Z. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0261091. PMC 8641874. PMID 34860855.
^ United Nations Development Programme 2016, p. 5.
^ “Definitions: energy, sustainability and the future”. OpenLearn. The Open University. Archived from the original on 27 January 2021. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
^ Golus̆in, Popov & Dodić 2013, p. 8.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Hammond, Geoffrey P.; Jones, Craig I. “Sustainability criteria for energy resources and technologies”. In Galarraga, González-Eguino & Markandya (2011), pp. 21–47.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNECE 2020, pp. 3–4.
^ Gunnarsdottir, I.; Davidsdottir, B.; Worrell, E.; Sigurgeirsdottir, S. (May 2021). “Sustainable energy development: History of the concept and emerging themes”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 141: 110770. Bibcode:2021RSERv.14110770G. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110770. hdl:1874/411740.
^ Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 1–2.
^ Vera, Ivan; Langlois, Lucille (2007). “Energy indicators for sustainable development”. Energy. 32 (6): 875–882. Bibcode:2007Ene….32..875V. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2006.08.006.
^ Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 3–5.
^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2021). “What are the safest and cleanest sources of energy?”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 15 January 2024. Data sources: Markandya & Wilkinson (2007); UNSCEAR (2008; 2018); Sovacool et al. (2016); IPCC AR5 (2014); Pehl et al. (2017); Ember Energy (2021).
^ Jump up to:^a ^b United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. 46.
^ “Global Historical Emissions”. Climate Watch. Archived from the original on 4 June 2021. Retrieved 19 August 2021.
^ Ge, Mengpin; Friedrich, Johannes; Vigna, Leandro (August 2021). “4 Charts Explain Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Countries and Sectors”. World Resources Institute. Archived from the original on 19 August 2021. Retrieved 19 August 2021.
^ “The Paris Agreement”. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Archived from the original on 19 March 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
^ Watts, Nick; Amann, Markus; Arnell, Nigel; Ayeb-Karlsson, Sonja; et al. (2021). “The 2020 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: responding to converging crises” (PDF). The Lancet. 397 (10269): 151. Bibcode:2021Lanc..397..129W. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32290-X. PMC 7616803. PMID 33278353.
^ “Every breath you take: The staggering, true cost of air pollution”. United Nations Development Programme. 4 June 2019. Archived from the original on 20 April 2021. Retrieved 4 May 2021.
^ “New WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines aim to save millions of lives from air pollution”. World Health Organization. 22 September 2021. Archived from the original on 23 September 2021. Retrieved 16 October 2021.
^ “Acid Rain and Water”. United States Geological Survey. Archived from the original on 27 June 2021. Retrieved 14 October 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b World Health Organization 2018, p. 16.
^ “Ambient (outdoor) air pollution”. World Health Organization. 22 September 2021. Archived from the original on 8 October 2021. Retrieved 22 October 2021.
^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2019). “Access to Energy”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 1 April 2021. Retrieved 1 April 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b World Health Organization 2016, pp. vii–xiv.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 118.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, pp. 470–472.
^ Tester et al. 2012, p. 504.
^ Kessides, Ioannis N.; Toman, Michael (28 July 2011). “The Global Energy Challenge”. World Bank. Archived from the original on 25 July 2019. Retrieved 27 September 2019.
^ Morris et al. 2015, pp. 24–27.
^ “Access to clean cooking”. SDG7: Data and Projections. IEA. October 2020. Archived from the original on 6 December 2019. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
^ IEA 2021, p. 167.
^ Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu (20 July 2022). “Winners and losers of energy sustainability—Global assessment of the Sustainable Development Goals”. Science of the Total Environment. 831. 154945. Bibcode:2022ScTEn.83154945S. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154945. hdl:11250/3023660. PMID 35367559.
^ Deputy Secretary-General (6 June 2018). “Sustainable Development Goal 7 on Reliable, Modern Energy ‘Golden Thread’ Linking All Other Targets, Deputy-Secretary-General Tells High-Level Panel” (Press release). United Nations. Archived from the original on 17 May 2021. Retrieved 19 March 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Goal 7: Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all”. SDG Tracker. Archived from the original on 2 February 2021. Retrieved 12 March 2021.
^ “Energy use per person”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 28 November 2020. Retrieved 16 July 2021.
^ “Europe 2030: Energy saving to become “first fuel””. EU Science Hub. European Commission. 25 February 2016. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
^ Motherway, Brian (19 December 2019). “Energy efficiency is the first fuel, and demand for it needs to grow”. IEA. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
^ “Energy Efficiency 2018: Analysis and outlooks to 2040”. IEA. October 2018. Archived from the original on 29 September 2020.
^ Fernandez Pales, Araceli; Bouckaert, Stéphanie; Abergel, Thibaut; Goodson, Timothy (10 June 2021). “Net zero by 2050 hinges on a global push to increase energy efficiency”. IEA. Archived from the original on 20 July 2021. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA 2021, pp. 68–69.
^ Mundaca, Luis; Ürge-Vorsatz, Diana; Wilson, Charlie (February 2019). “Demand-side approaches for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C”. Energy Efficiency. 12 (2): 343–362. Bibcode:2019EnEff..12..343M. doi:10.1007/s12053-018-9722-9.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA, IRENA, United Nations Statistics Division, World Bank, World Health Organization 2021, p. 12.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA, IRENA, United Nations Statistics Division, World Bank, World Health Organization 2021, p. 11.
^ Brockway, Paul E.; Sorrell, Steve; Semieniuk, Gregor; Heun, Matthew Kuperus; Court, Victor (May 2021). “Energy efficiency and economy-wide rebound effects: A review of the evidence and its implications”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 141: 110781. Bibcode:2021RSERv.14110781B. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110781.
^ “Energy Efficiency 2019”. IEA. November 2019. Archived from the original on 13 October 2020. Retrieved 21 September 2020.
^ Bond, Kingsmill; Butler-Sloss, Sam; Lovins, Amory; Speelman, Laurens; Topping, Nigel (13 June 2023). “Report / 2023 / X-Change: Electricity / On track for disruption”. Rocky Mountain Institute. Archived from the original on 13 July 2023.
^ Source for data beginning in 2017: “Renewable Energy Market Update Outlook for 2023 and 2024” (PDF). International Energy Agency. June 2023. p. 19. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 July 2023. IEA. CC BY 4.0. ● Source for data through 2016: “Renewable Energy Market Update / Outlook for 2021 and 2022” (PDF). IEA.org. International Energy Agency. May 2021. p. 8. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 March 2023. IEA. Licence: CC BY 4.0
^ “World Energy Investment 2023 / Overview and key findings”. International Energy Agency (IEA). 25 May 2023. Archived from the original on 31 May 2023. Global energy investment in clean energy and in fossil fuels, 2015-2023 (chart) — From pages 8 and 12 of World Energy Investment 2023 (archive).
^ IEA 2007, p. 3.
^ Santangeli, Andrea; Toivonen, Tuuli; Pouzols, Federico Montesino; Pogson, Mark; Hastings, Astley; Smith, Pete; Moilanen, Atte (September 2016). “Global change synergies and trade-offs between renewable energy and biodiversity”. GCB Bioenergy. 8 (5): 941–951. Bibcode:2016GCBBi…8..941S. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12299. hdl:2164/6138.
^ Rehbein, Jose A.; Watson, James E. M.; Lane, Joe L.; Sonter, Laura J.; Venter, Oscar; Atkinson, Scott C.; Allan, James R. (May 2020). “Renewable energy development threatens many globally important biodiversity areas”. Global Change Biology. 26 (5): 3040–3051. Bibcode:2020GCBio..26.3040R. doi:10.1111/gcb.15067. PMID 32133726.
^ Ritchie, Hannah (2019). “Renewable Energy”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 4 August 2020. Retrieved 31 July 2020.
^ Renewables 2020 Analysis and forecast to 2025 (PDF) (Report). IEA. 2020. p. 12. Archived from the original on 26 April 2021.
^ “Access to electricity”. SDG7: Data and Projections. IEA. 2020. Archived from the original on 13 May 2021. Retrieved 5 May 2021.
^ “Infrastructure Solutions: The power of purchase agreements”. European Investment Bank. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
^ “Renewable Power – Analysis”. IEA. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
^ “Global Electricity Review 2022”. Ember. 29 March 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
^ “Renewable Energy and Electricity | Sustainable Energy | Renewable Energy – World Nuclear Association”. world-nuclear.org. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA (2022), Renewables 2022, IEA, Paris https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2022, License: CC BY 4.0
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 406.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Wind & Solar Share in Electricity Production Data”. Global Energy Statistical Yearbook 2021. Enerdata. Archived from the original on 19 July 2019. Retrieved 13 June 2021.
^ Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 34–35.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Levelized Cost of Energy and of Storage”. Lazard. 19 October 2020. Archived from the original on 25 February 2021. Retrieved 26 February 2021.
^ Victoria, Marta; Haegel, Nancy; Peters, Ian Marius; Sinton, Ron; Jäger-Waldau, Arnulf; del Cañizo, Carlos; Breyer, Christian; Stocks, Matthew; Blakers, Andrew; Kaizuka, Izumi; Komoto, Keiichi; Smets, Arno (May 2021). “Solar photovoltaics is ready to power a sustainable future”. Joule. 5 (5): 1041–1056. Bibcode:2021Joule…5.1041V. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2021.03.005.
^ IRENA 2021, pp. 19, 22.
^ Goetz, Katelyn P.; Taylor, Alexander D.; Hofstetter, Yvonne J.; Vaynzof, Yana (13 January 2021). “Sustainability in Perovskite Solar Cells”. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 13 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1021/acsami.0c17269. PMID 33372760.
^ Xu, Yan; Li, Jinhui; Tan, Quanyin; Peters, Anesia Lauren; Yang, Congren (May 2018). “Global status of recycling waste solar panels: A review”. Waste Management. 75: 450–458. Bibcode:2018WaMan..75..450X. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.01.036. PMID 29472153.
^ Tian, Xueyu; Stranks, Samuel D.; You, Fengqi (31 July 2020). “Life cycle energy use and environmental implications of high-performance perovskite tandem solar cells”. Science Advances. 6 (31): eabb0055. Bibcode:2020SciA….6…55T. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb0055. PMC 7399695. PMID 32789177.
^ Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 35–36.
^ “Solar energy”. International Renewable Energy Agency. Archived from the original on 13 May 2021. Retrieved 5 June 2021.
^ REN21 2020, p. 124.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 366.
^ “What are the advantages and disadvantages of offshore wind farms?”. American Geosciences Institute. 12 May 2016. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
^ Szarka 2007, p. 176.
^ Wang, Shifeng; Wang, Sicong (September 2015). “Impacts of wind energy on environment: A review”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 49: 437–443. Bibcode:2015RSERv..49..437W. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.137.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 215.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 213.
^ Huang, Yu-Fong; Gan, Xing-Jia; Chiueh, Pei-Te (March 2017). “Life cycle assessment and net energy analysis of offshore wind power systems”. Renewable Energy. 102: 98–106. Bibcode:2017REne..102…98H. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2016.10.050.
^ Belton, Padraig (7 February 2020). “What happens to all the old wind turbines?”. BBC. Archived from the original on 23 February 2021. Retrieved 27 February 2021.
^ Smil 2017b, p. 286.
^ REN21 2021, p. 21.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Moran, Emilio F.; Lopez, Maria Claudia; Moore, Nathan; Müller, Norbert; Hyndman, David W. (20 November 2018). “Sustainable hydropower in the 21st century”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115 (47): 11891–11898. Bibcode:2018PNAS..11511891M. doi:10.1073/pnas.1809426115. PMC 6255148. PMID 30397145.
^ Kumar, A.; Schei, T.; Ahenkorah, A.; Caceres Rodriguez, R. et al. “Hydropower“. In IPCC (2011), pp. 451, 462, 488.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Schlömer, S.; Bruckner, T.; Fulton, L.; Hertwich, E. et al. “Annex III: Technology-specific cost and performance parameters“. In IPCC (2014), p. 1335.
^ Almeida, Rafael M.; Shi, Qinru; Gomes-Selman, Jonathan M.; Wu, Xiaojian; Xue, Yexiang; Angarita, Hector; Barros, Nathan; Forsberg, Bruce R.; García-Villacorta, Roosevelt; Hamilton, Stephen K.; Melack, John M.; Montoya, Mariana; Perez, Guillaume; Sethi, Suresh A.; Gomes, Carla P.; Flecker, Alexander S. (19 September 2019). “Reducing greenhouse gas emissions of Amazon hydropower with strategic dam planning”. Nature Communications. 10 (1): 4281. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12179-5. PMC 6753097. PMID 31537792.
^ László, Erika (1981). “Geothermal Energy: An Old Ally”. Ambio. 10 (5): 248–249. JSTOR 4312703.
^ REN21 2020, p. 97.
^ “Geothermal Energy Information and Facts”. National Geographic. 19 October 2009. Archived from the original on 8 August 2021. Retrieved 8 August 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2020). “Energy mix”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 2 July 2021. Retrieved 9 July 2021.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, pp. 222, 228.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, pp. 228–229.
^ “Biomass explained”. US Energy Information Administration. 8 June 2021. Archived from the original on 15 September 2021. Retrieved 13 September 2021.
^ Kopetz, Heinz (7 February 2013). “Build a biomass energy market”. Nature. 494 (7435): 29–31. doi:10.1038/494029a. PMID 23389528.
^ Demirbas, Ayhan (August 2008). “Biofuels sources, biofuel policy, biofuel economy and global biofuel projections”. Energy Conversion and Management. 49 (8): 2106–2116. Bibcode:2008ECM….49.2106D. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2008.02.020.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Correa, Diego F.; Beyer, Hawthorne L.; Fargione, Joseph E.; Hill, Jason D.; Possingham, Hugh P.; Thomas-Hall, Skye R.; Schenk, Peer M. (June 2019). “Towards the implementation of sustainable biofuel production systems”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 107: 250–263. Bibcode:2019RSERv.107..250C. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.005.
^ Daley, Jason (24 April 2018). “The EPA Declared That Burning Wood Is Carbon Neutral. It’s Actually a Lot More Complicated”. Smithsonian Magazine. Archived from the original on 30 June 2021. Retrieved 14 September 2021.
^ Tester et al. 2012, p. 512.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Smil 2017a, p. 162.
^ World Health Organization 2016, p. 73.
^ IPCC 2014, p. 616.
^ “Biofuels explained: Ethanol”. US Energy Information Administration. 18 June 2020. Archived from the original on 14 May 2021. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
^ Foley, Jonathan (5 March 2013). “It’s Time to Rethink America’s Corn System”. Scientific American. Archived from the original on 3 January 2020. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
^ Ayompe, Lacour M.; Schaafsma, M.; Egoh, Benis N. (January 2021). “Towards sustainable palm oil production: The positive and negative impacts on ecosystem services and human wellbeing”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 278: 123914. Bibcode:2021JCPro.27823914A. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123914.
^ Lustgarten, Abrahm (20 November 2018). “Palm Oil Was Supposed to Help Save the Planet. Instead It Unleashed a Catastrophe”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 17 May 2019. Retrieved 15 May 2019.
^ Smil 2017a, p. 161.
^ National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2019, p. 3.
^ REN21 2021, pp. 113–116.
^ “The Role of Gas: Key Findings”. IEA. July 2019. Archived from the original on 1 September 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
^ “Natural gas and the environment”. US Energy Information Administration. Archived from the original on 2 April 2021. Retrieved 28 March 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Storrow, Benjamin. “Methane Leaks Erase Some of the Climate Benefits of Natural Gas”. Scientific American. Retrieved 31 May 2023.
^ Plumer, Brad (26 June 2019). “As Coal Fades in the U.S., Natural Gas Becomes the Climate Battleground”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 23 September 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
^ Gürsan, C.; de Gooyert, V. (March 2021). “The systemic impact of a transition fuel: Does natural gas help or hinder the energy transition?”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 138: 110552. Bibcode:2021RSERv.13810552G. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110552. hdl:2066/228782.
^ Budinis, Sara; Krevor, Samuel; Dowell, Niall Mac; Brandon, Nigel; Hawkes, Adam (November 2018). “An assessment of CCS costs, barriers and potential”. Energy Strategy Reviews. 22: 61–81. Bibcode:2018EneSR..22…61B. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2018.08.003.
^ “Zero-emission carbon capture and storage in power plants using higher capture rates”. IEA. 7 January 2021. Archived from the original on 30 March 2021. Retrieved 14 March 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Ritchie, Hannah (10 February 2020). “What are the safest and cleanest sources of energy?”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 29 November 2020. Retrieved 14 March 2021.
^ Evans, Simon (8 December 2017). “Solar, wind and nuclear have ‘amazingly low’ carbon footprints, study finds”. Carbon Brief. Archived from the original on 16 March 2021. Retrieved 15 March 2021.
^ IPCC 2018, 5.4.1.2.
^ IPCC AR6 WG3 2022, p. 38.
^ “Global Status Report 2024”. Global CCS Institute. pp. 57–58. Retrieved 19 October 2024. The report lists 50 facilities, of which 3 are direct air capture facilities and 3 are transport/storage facilities
^ Roser, Max (10 December 2020). “The world’s energy problem”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 21 July 2021. Retrieved 21 July 2021.
^ Rhodes, Richard (19 July 2018). “Why Nuclear Power Must Be Part of the Energy Solution”. Yale Environment 360. Yale School of the Environment. Archived from the original on 9 August 2021. Retrieved 24 July 2021.
^ “Nuclear Power in the World Today”. World Nuclear Association. June 2021. Archived from the original on 16 July 2021. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
^ Bailey, Ronald (10 May 2023). “New study: Nuclear power is humanity’s greenest energy option”. Reason.com. Retrieved 22 May 2023.
^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2020). “Nuclear Energy”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 20 July 2021. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
^ MacKay 2008, p. 162.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Gill, Matthew; Livens, Francis; Peakman, Aiden (2014). “Nuclear Fission”. Future Energy. pp. 135–149. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102886-5.00007-4. ISBN 978-0-08-102886-5.
^ Muellner, Nikolaus; Arnold, Nikolaus; Gufler, Klaus; Kromp, Wolfgang; Renneberg, Wolfgang; Liebert, Wolfgang (August 2021). “Nuclear energy – The solution to climate change?”. Energy Policy. 155: 112363. Bibcode:2021EnPol.15512363M. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112363.
^ IPCC 2018, 2.4.2.1.
^ Timmer, John (21 November 2020). “Why are nuclear plants so expensive? Safety’s only part of the story”. Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 28 April 2021. Retrieved 17 March 2021.
^ Technical assessment of nuclear energy with respect to the ‘do no significant harm’ criteria of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (‘Taxonomy Regulation’) (PDF) (Report). European Commission Joint Research Centre. 2021. p. 53. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 April 2021.
^ Locatelli, Giorgio; Mignacca, Benito (2020). “Small Modular Nuclear Reactors”. Future Energy. pp. 151–169. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102886-5.00008-6. ISBN 978-0-08-102886-5.
^ McGrath, Matt (6 November 2019). “Nuclear fusion is ‘a question of when, not if'”. BBC. Archived from the original on 25 January 2021. Retrieved 13 February 2021.
^ Amos, Jonathan (9 February 2022). “Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy”. BBC. Archived from the original on 1 March 2022. Retrieved 10 February 2022.
^ “Energy Transition Investment Now On Par with Fossil Fuel”. Bloomberg NEF (New Energy Finance). 10 February 2023. Archived from the original on 27 March 2023.
^ Jaccard 2020, pp. 202–203, Chapter 11 – “Renewables Have Won”.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d IPCC 2014, 7.11.3.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 106–110.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Evans, Simon; Gabbatiss, Josh (30 November 2020). “In-depth Q&A: Does the world need hydrogen to solve climate change?”. Carbon Brief. Archived from the original on 1 December 2020. Retrieved 1 December 2020.
^ Jaccard 2020, p. 203, Chapter 11 – “Renewables Have Won”.
^ “Reaching net zero emissions demands faster innovation, but we’ve already come a long way – Analysis”. International Energy Agency. 13 November 2023. Retrieved 30 April 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA 2021, p. 15.
^ “Innovation – Energy System”. International Energy Agency. Retrieved 30 April 2024.
^ World Health Organization 2018, Executive Summary.
^ Vandyck, T.; Keramidas, K.; Kitous, A.; Spadaro, J.V.; et al. (2018). “Air quality co-benefits for human health and agriculture counterbalance costs to meet Paris Agreement pledges”. Nature Communications. 9 (1): 4939. Bibcode:2018NatCo…9.4939V. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06885-9. PMC 6250710. PMID 30467311.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations Environment Programme 2019, pp. 46–55.
^ IPCC 2018, p. 97.
^ Hopwood, David (May 2007). “Blueprint for sustainability?”. Refocus. 8 (3): 54–57. doi:10.1016/S1471-0846(07)70068-9.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. 47.
^ “Introduction to System Integration of Renewables”. IEA. Archived from the original on 15 May 2020. Retrieved 30 May 2020.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Blanco, Herib; Faaij, André (January 2018). “A review at the role of storage in energy systems with a focus on Power to Gas and long-term storage” (PDF). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 81: 1049–1086. Bibcode:2018RSERv..81.1049B. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.062.
^ REN21 2020, p. 177.
^ Bloess, Andreas; Schill, Wolf-Peter; Zerrahn, Alexander (February 2018). “Power-to-heat for renewable energy integration: A review of technologies, modeling approaches, and flexibility potentials”. Applied Energy. 212: 1611–1626. Bibcode:2018ApEn..212.1611B. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.073. hdl:10419/200120.
^ IEA 2020, p. 109.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Koohi-Fayegh, S.; Rosen, M.A. (February 2020). “A review of energy storage types, applications and recent developments”. Journal of Energy Storage. 27: 101047. Bibcode:2020JEnSt..2701047K. doi:10.1016/j.est.2019.101047.
^ Katz, Cheryl (17 December 2020). “The batteries that could make fossil fuels obsolete”. BBC. Archived from the original on 11 January 2021. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Climate change and batteries: the search for future power storage solutions” (PDF). Climate change: science and solutions. The Royal Society. 19 May 2021. Archived from the original on 16 October 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
^ Hunt, Julian D.; Byers, Edward; Wada, Yoshihide; Parkinson, Simon; Gernaat, David E. H. J.; Langan, Simon; van Vuuren, Detlef P.; Riahi, Keywan (19 February 2020). “Global resource potential of seasonal pumped hydropower storage for energy and water storage”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 947. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11..947H. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14555-y. PMC 7031375. PMID 32075965.
^ Balaraman, Kavya (12 October 2020). “To batteries and beyond: With seasonal storage potential, hydrogen offers ‘a different ballgame entirely'”. Utility Dive. Archived from the original on 18 January 2021. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
^ Cole, Laura (15 November 2020). “How to cut carbon out of your heating”. BBC. Archived from the original on 27 August 2021. Retrieved 31 August 2021.
^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2020). “Electricity Mix”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 13 October 2021. Retrieved 16 October 2021.
^ IPCC 2018, 2.4.2.2.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 167–169.
^ United Nations Development Programme 2016, p. 30.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Herrington, Richard (24 May 2021). “Mining our green future”. Nature Reviews Materials. 6 (6): 456–458. Bibcode:2021NatRM…6..456H. doi:10.1038/s41578-021-00325-9.
^ Mudd, Gavin M. “Metals and Elements Needed to Support Future Energy Systems”. In Letcher (2020), pp. 723–724.
^ Babbitt, Callie W. (August 2020). “Sustainability perspectives on lithium-ion batteries”. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 22 (6): 1213–1214. Bibcode:2020CTEP…22.1213B. doi:10.1007/s10098-020-01890-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c IPCC AR6 WG3 2022, pp. 91–92.
^ Evans, Simon; Gabbatiss, Josh (30 November 2020). “In-depth Q&A: Does the world need hydrogen to solve climate change?”. Carbon Brief. Archived from the original on 1 December 2020. Retrieved 1 December 2020.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Lewis, Alastair C. (10 June 2021). “Optimising air quality co-benefits in a hydrogen economy: a case for hydrogen-specific standards for NO x emissions”. Environmental Science: Atmospheres. 1 (5): 201–207. Bibcode:2021ESAt….1..201L. doi:10.1039/D1EA00037C. This article incorporates text from this source, which is available under the CC BY 3.0 license.
^ Reed, Stanley; Ewing, Jack (13 July 2021). “Hydrogen Is One Answer to Climate Change. Getting It Is the Hard Part”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 14 July 2021. Retrieved 14 July 2021.
^ IRENA 2019, p. 9.
^ Bonheure, Mike; Vandewalle, Laurien A.; Marin, Guy B.; Van Geem, Kevin M. (March 2021). “Dream or Reality? Electrification of the Chemical Process Industries”. CEP Magazine. American Institute of Chemical Engineers. Archived from the original on 17 July 2021. Retrieved 6 July 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Griffiths, Steve; Sovacool, Benjamin K.; Kim, Jinsoo; Bazilian, Morgan; Uratani, Joao M. (October 2021). “Industrial decarbonization via hydrogen: A critical and systematic review of developments, socio-technical systems and policy options”. Energy Research & Social Science. 80: 102208. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102208.
^ Palys, Matthew J.; Daoutidis, Prodromos (May 2020). “Using hydrogen and ammonia for renewable energy storage: A geographically comprehensive techno-economic study”. Computers & Chemical Engineering. 136: 106785. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106785.
^ IRENA 2021, pp. 12, 22.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 15, 75–76.
^ Kjellberg-Motton, Brendan (7 February 2022). “Steel decarbonisation gathers speed | Argus Media”. www.argusmedia.com. Retrieved 7 September 2023.
^ Blank, Thomas; Molly, Patrick (January 2020). “Hydrogen’s Decarbonization Impact for Industry” (PDF). Rocky Mountain Institute. pp. 2, 7, 8. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 September 2020.
^ Plötz, Patrick (31 January 2022). “Hydrogen technology is unlikely to play a major role in sustainable road transport”. Nature Electronics. 5 (1): 8–10. doi:10.1038/s41928-021-00706-6.
^ Fraser, Simon D.S.; Lock, Karen (December 2011). “Cycling for transport and public health: a systematic review of the effect of the environment on cycling”. European Journal of Public Health. 21 (6): 738–743. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckq145. PMID 20929903.
^ “Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data”. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 12 January 2016. Archived from the original on 5 December 2019. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
^ Bigazzi, Alexander (May 2019). “Comparison of marginal and average emission factors for passenger transportation modes”. Applied Energy. 242: 1460–1466. Bibcode:2019ApEn..242.1460B. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.172.
^ Schäfer, Andreas W.; Yeh, Sonia (20 April 2020). “A holistic analysis of passenger travel energy and greenhouse gas intensities”. Nature Sustainability. 3 (6): 459–462. Bibcode:2020NatSu…3..459S. doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0514-9.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2020, p. xxv.
^ IEA 2021, p. 137.
^ Pucher, John; Buehler, Ralph (2 November 2017). “Cycling towards a more sustainable transport future”. Transport Reviews. 37 (6): 689–694. doi:10.1080/01441647.2017.1340234.
^ Smith, John (22 September 2016). “Sustainable transport”. European Commission. Archived from the original on 22 October 2021. Retrieved 22 October 2021.
^ Knobloch, Florian; Hanssen, Steef V.; Lam, Aileen; Pollitt, Hector; Salas, Pablo; Chewpreecha, Unnada; Huijbregts, Mark A. J.; Mercure, Jean-Francois (23 March 2020). “Net emission reductions from electric cars and heat pumps in 59 world regions over time”. Nature Sustainability. 3 (6): 437–447. Bibcode:2020NatSu…3..437K. doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0488-7. PMC 7308170. PMID 32572385.
^ Bogdanov, Dmitrii; Farfan, Javier; Sadovskaia, Kristina; Aghahosseini, Arman; Child, Michael; Gulagi, Ashish; Oyewo, Ayobami Solomon; de Souza Noel Simas Barbosa, Larissa; Breyer, Christian (6 March 2019). “Radical transformation pathway towards sustainable electricity via evolutionary steps”. Nature Communications. 10 (1). doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08855-1. PMC 6403340. PMID 30842423.
^ Martini, Giorgio; Grigoratos, Theodoros (2014). Non-exhaust traffic related emissions – Brake and tyre wear PM. EUR 26648. Publications Office of the European Union. p. 42. ISBN 978-92-79-38303-8. OCLC 1044281650. Archived from the original on 30 July 2021.
^ Non-exhaust Particulate Emissions from Road Transport. 2020. pp. 8–9. doi:10.1787/4a4dc6ca-en. ISBN 978-92-64-45244-2.
^ “CO₂ performance of new passenger cars in Europe”. www.eea.europa.eu. Retrieved 19 October 2022.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 133–137.
^ “Rail and waterborne – best for low-carbon motorised transport”. European Environment Agency. Archived from the original on 9 October 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
^ Miller, Joe (9 September 2020). “Hydrogen takes a back seat to electric for passenger vehicles”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 20 September 2020. Retrieved 9 September 2020.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 136, 139.
^ Biomass in a low-carbon economy (Report). UK Committee on Climate Change. November 2018. p. 18. Archived from the original on 28 December 2019. Retrieved 28 December 2019.
^ “Buildings”. IEA. Archived from the original on 14 October 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
^ Mortensen, Anders Winther; Mathiesen, Brian Vad; Hansen, Anders Bavnhøj; Pedersen, Sigurd Lauge; Grandal, Rune Duban; Wenzel, Henrik (October 2020). “The role of electrification and hydrogen in breaking the biomass bottleneck of the renewable energy system – A study on the Danish energy system”. Applied Energy. 275: 115331. Bibcode:2020ApEn..27515331M. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115331.
^ Knobloch, Florian; Pollitt, Hector; Chewpreecha, Unnada; Daioglou, Vassilis; Mercure, Jean-Francois (February 2019). “Simulating the deep decarbonisation of residential heating for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C”. Energy Efficiency. 12 (2): 521–550. arXiv:1710.11019. Bibcode:2019EnEff..12..521K. doi:10.1007/s12053-018-9710-0.
^ Alva, Guruprasad; Lin, Yaxue; Fang, Guiyin (February 2018). “An overview of thermal energy storage systems”. Energy. 144: 341–378. Bibcode:2018Ene…144..341A. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.037.
^ Plumer, Brad (30 June 2021). “Are ‘Heat Pumps’ the Answer to Heat Waves? Some Cities Think So”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 10 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
^ Abergel, Thibaut (June 2020). “Heat Pumps”. IEA. Archived from the original on 3 March 2021. Retrieved 12 April 2021.
^ Buffa, Simone; Cozzini, Marco; D’Antoni, Matteo; Baratieri, Marco; et al. (2019). “5th generation district heating and cooling systems: A review of existing cases in Europe”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 104: 504–522. Bibcode:2019RSERv.104..504B. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.059.
^ Lund, Henrik; Werner, Sven; Wiltshire, Robin; Svendsen, Svend; et al. (2014). “4th Generation District Heating (4GDH)”. Energy. 68: 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.089. Archived from the original on 7 March 2021. Retrieved 13 June 2021.
^ Abdolhamidi, Shervin (27 September 2018). “An ancient engineering feat that harnessed the wind”. BBC. Archived from the original on 12 August 2021. Retrieved 12 August 2021.
^ “How cities are using nature to keep heatwaves at bay”. United Nations Environment Programme. 22 July 2020. Archived from the original on 11 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Four Things You Should Know About Sustainable Cooling”. World Bank. 23 May 2019. Archived from the original on 11 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
^ Mastrucci, Alessio; Byers, Edward; Pachauri, Shonali; Rao, Narasimha D. (March 2019). “Improving the SDG energy poverty targets: Residential cooling needs in the Global South”. Energy and Buildings. 186: 405–415. Bibcode:2019EneBu.186..405M. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.01.015.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Smith & Pillarisetti 2017, pp. 145–146.
^ “Cooking appliances”. Natural Resources Canada. 16 January 2013. Archived from the original on 30 July 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2021.
^ World Health Organization; International Energy Agency; Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves; United Nations Development Programme; Energising Development; and World Bank (2018). Accelerating SDG 7 Achievement Policy Brief 02: Achieving Universal Access to Clean and Modern Cooking Fuels, Technologies and Services (PDF) (Report). United Nations. p. 3. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 March 2021.
^ World Health Organization 2016, p. 75.
^ IPCC 2014, p. 29.
^ World Health Organization 2016, p. 12.
^ REN21 2020, p. 40.
^ IEA 2020, p. 135.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. 50.
^ Åhman, Max; Nilsson, Lars J.; Johansson, Bengt (4 July 2017). “Global climate policy and deep decarbonization of energy-intensive industries”. Climate Policy. 17 (5): 634–649. Bibcode:2017CliPo..17..634A. doi:10.1080/14693062.2016.1167009.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. xxiii.
^ IEA 2021, p. 186.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c United Nations Environment Programme 2019, pp. 39–45.
^ Jaccard 2020, p. 109, Chapter 6 – We Must Price Carbon Emissions”.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b United Nations Environment Programme 2019, pp. 28–36.
^ Ciucci, M. (February 2020). “Renewable Energy”. European Parliament. Archived from the original on 4 June 2020. Retrieved 3 June 2020.
^ “State Renewable Portfolio Standards and Goals”. National Conference of State Legislators. 17 April 2020. Archived from the original on 3 June 2020. Retrieved 3 June 2020.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 14–25.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 184–187.
^ IEA 2021, p. 16.
^ Jaccard 2020, pp. 106–109, Chapter 6 – “We Must Price Carbon Emissions”.
^ Plumer, Brad (8 October 2018). “New U.N. Climate Report Says Put a High Price on Carbon”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 27 September 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
^ Green, Jessica F (April 2021). “Does carbon pricing reduce emissions? A review of ex-post analyses”. Environmental Research Letters. 16 (4): 043004. Bibcode:2021ERL….16d3004G. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abdae9.
^ IPCC 2018, 2.5.2.1.
^ State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2019 (PDF) (Report). World Bank. June 2019. pp. 8–11. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1435-8. hdl:10986/29687. ISBN 978-1-4648-1435-8. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 May 2020.
^ “Revenue-Neutral Carbon Tax | Canada”. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Archived from the original on 28 October 2019. Retrieved 28 October 2019.
^ Carr, Mathew (10 October 2018). “How High Does Carbon Need to Be? Somewhere From $20–$27,000”. Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 5 August 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
^ “EAC launches new inquiry weighing up carbon border tax measures”. UK Parliament. 24 September 2021. Archived from the original on 24 September 2021. Retrieved 14 October 2021.
^ Plumer, Brad (14 July 2021). “Europe Is Proposing a Border Carbon Tax. What Is It and How Will It Work?”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 10 September 2021. Retrieved 10 September 2021.
^ Bharti, Bianca (12 August 2021). “Taxing imports of heavy carbon emitters is gaining momentum – and it could hurt Canadian industry: Report”. Financial Post. Archived from the original on 3 October 2021. Retrieved 3 October 2021.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2020, p. vii.
^ IEA 2021, p. 13.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 14–18.
^ IRENA, IEA & REN21 2018, p. 19.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “24 million jobs to open up in the green economy”. International Labour Organization. 14 May 2018. Archived from the original on 2 June 2021. Retrieved 30 May 2021.
^ Catsaros, Oktavia (26 January 2023). “Global Low-Carbon Energy Technology Investment Surges Past $1 Trillion for the First Time”. Bloomberg NEF (New Energy Finance). Figure 1. Archived from the original on 22 May 2023. Defying supply chain disruptions and macroeconomic headwinds, 2022 energy transition investment jumped 31% to draw level with fossil fuels
^ “Global Clean Energy Investment Jumps 17%, Hits $1.8 Trillion in 2023, According to BloombergNEF Report”. BNEF.com. Bloomberg NEF. 30 January 2024. Archived from the original on 28 June 2024. Start years differ by sector but all sectors are present from 2020 onwards.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b 2024 data: “Energy Transition Investment Trends 2025 / Abridged report” (PDF). BloombergNEF. 30 January 2025. p. 9. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 February 2025.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Mazzucato, Mariana; Semieniuk, Gregor (February 2018). “Financing renewable energy: Who is financing what and why it matters”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 127: 8–22. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.021.
^ United Nations Development Programme & United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2019, p. 24.
^ IPCC 2018, p. 96.
^ IEA, IRENA, United Nations Statistics Division, World Bank, World Health Organization 2021, pp. 129, 132.
^ United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2018, p. 54.
^ United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2018, p. 9.
^ Roberts, J. Timmons; Weikmans, Romain; Robinson, Stacy-ann; Ciplet, David; Khan, Mizan; Falzon, Danielle (March 2021). “Rebooting a failed promise of climate finance”. Nature Climate Change. 11 (3): 180–182. Bibcode:2021NatCC..11..180R. doi:10.1038/s41558-021-00990-2.
^ Radwanski, Adam (29 September 2021). “Opinion: As pivotal climate summit approaches, Canada at centre of efforts to repair broken trust among poorer countries”. The Globe and Mail. Archived from the original on 30 September 2021. Retrieved 30 September 2021.
^ “Here are the clean energy innovations that will beat climate change”. European Investment Bank. Retrieved 26 September 2022.
^ “Home”. www.oecd-ilibrary.org. Retrieved 19 October 2022.
^ Bridle, Richard; Sharma, Shruti; Mostafa, Mostafa; Geddes, Anna (June 2019). “Fossil Fuel to Clean Energy Subsidy Swaps: How to pay for an energy revolution” (PDF). International Institute for Sustainable Development. p. iv. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 November 2019.
^ Watts, Nick; Amann, Markus; Arnell, Nigel; Ayeb-Karlsson, Sonja; Belesova, Kristine; Boykoff, Maxwell; Byass, Peter; Cai, Wenjia; Campbell-Lendrum, Diarmid; Capstick, Stuart; Chambers, Jonathan; Dalin, Carole; Daly, Meaghan; Dasandi, Niheer; Davies, Michael; Drummond, Paul; Dubrow, Robert; Ebi, Kristie L; Eckelman, Matthew; Ekins, Paul; Escobar, Luis E; Fernandez Montoya, Lucia; Georgeson, Lucien; Graham, Hilary; Haggar, Paul; Hamilton, Ian; Hartinger, Stella; Hess, Jeremy; Kelman, Ilan; Kiesewetter, Gregor; Kjellstrom, Tord; Kniveton, Dominic; Lemke, Bruno; Liu, Yang; Lott, Melissa; Lowe, Rachel; Sewe, Maquins Odhiambo; Martinez-Urtaza, Jaime; Maslin, Mark; McAllister, Lucy; McGushin, Alice; Jankin Mikhaylov, Slava; Milner, James; Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar; Morrissey, Karyn; Murray, Kris; Munzert, Simon; Nilsson, Maria; Neville, Tara; Oreszczyn, Tadj; Owfi, Fereidoon; Pearman, Olivia; Pencheon, David; Phung, Dung; Pye, Steve; Quinn, Ruth; Rabbaniha, Mahnaz; Robinson, Elizabeth; Rocklöv, Joacim; Semenza, Jan C; Sherman, Jodi; Shumake-Guillemot, Joy; Tabatabaei, Meisam; Taylor, Jonathon; Trinanes, Joaquin; Wilkinson, Paul; Costello, Anthony; Gong, Peng; Montgomery, Hugh (November 2019). “The 2019 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: ensuring that the health of a child born today is not defined by a changing climate”. The Lancet. 394 (10211): 1836–1878. Bibcode:2019Lanc..394.1836W. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32596-6. PMC 7616843. PMID 31733928.
^ United Nations Development Programme 2020, p. 10.
^ Kuzemko, Caroline; Bradshaw, Michael; Bridge, Gavin; Goldthau, Andreas; Jewell, Jessica; Overland, Indra; Scholten, Daniel; Van de Graaf, Thijs; Westphal, Kirsten (October 2020). “Covid-19 and the politics of sustainable energy transitions”. Energy Research & Social Science. 68: 101685. Bibcode:2020ERSS…6801685K. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101685. PMC 7330551. PMID 32839704.
^ IRENA 2021, p. 5.