Sustainable Technology Of 4100

Sustainable technology of 4100 ?

While it’s impossible to predict the exact nature of technology in 4100, we can speculate on the direction sustainable technology might take based on current trends and challenges:

1. Advanced Energy Systems:

Fusion Power: If achieved, fusion would provide a near-limitless source of clean energy.
Space-Based Solar: Harnessing solar energy from space and beaming it to Earth could provide a continuous and abundant power supply.
Hyper-Efficient Energy Storage: Technologies like advanced batteries or other novel storage methods would be essential for balancing intermittent renewable sources.

2. Resource Management:

Closed-Loop Systems: Technologies that mimic natural ecosystems, recycling all resources and minimizing waste, would be crucial.
Advanced Recycling: Highly efficient processes for breaking down and reusing materials at a molecular level.
Resource Extraction from Space: Mining asteroids or other celestial bodies for rare or essential elements could become feasible.

3. Environmental Restoration:

Advanced Carbon Capture and Sequestration: Technologies to remove CO2 from the atmosphere and store it safely.
Geoengineering: Techniques to counteract the effects of climate change, such as solar radiation management or cloud seeding.
Ecosystem Restoration: Technologies to repair damaged ecosystems and restore biodiversity.

4. Sustainable Infrastructure:

Smart Cities: Urban centers designed for efficiency, with integrated systems for energy, transportation, and waste management.
Vertical Farms: High-tech, multi-story farms that maximize food production in urban areas.
Sustainable Transportation: Advanced systems for electric or other clean transportation, including high-speed rail and autonomous vehicles.

5. Biotechnology and Materials Science:

Biomanufacturing: Using biological systems to produce materials and products sustainably.
Biodegradable Materials: Advanced plastics and other materials that break down naturally.
Self-Healing Materials: Materials that can repair themselves, extending the lifespan of products and infrastructure.

Challenges and Considerations:

Ethical Implications: As technology advances, it’s crucial to consider the ethical implications and potential unintended consequences.
Accessibility: Ensuring that sustainable technologies are accessible to everyone, not just the wealthy.
Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change requires international cooperation and shared responsibility.

It’s important to remember that this is just speculation. The actual sustainable technologies of 4100 could be very different from what we imagine today. However, by focusing on innovation, collaboration, and ethical considerations, we can increase the chances of creating a sustainable future for all.

What is Sustainable technology of 4100 ?

Predicting the exact nature of sustainable technology in 4100 is a fascinating thought experiment! Here’s a breakdown of potential advancements, building upon current trends and addressing future challenges:

1. Energy & Resource Revolution:

Fusion Power Mastery: If achieved, fusion would provide near-limitless clean energy, powering civilization without the risks of nuclear fission.
Space-Based Solar: Imagine vast solar arrays in orbit, capturing sunlight without atmospheric interference, beaming clean energy to Earth.
Hyper-Efficient Energy Storage: Technologies far beyond today’s batteries would be essential to balance intermittent renewable sources like space-based solar.
Resource Alchemy: Advanced recycling at the molecular level, transforming waste into valuable resources, achieving true circularity.
Space Mining: Asteroids and other celestial bodies could become vital sources for rare elements, reducing reliance on Earth’s finite resources.

2. Environmental Harmony:

Atmospheric Regeneration: Advanced carbon capture and sequestration, potentially combined with geoengineering techniques, to reverse climate change effects.
Ecosystem Restoration: Technologies to repair damaged ecosystems and restore biodiversity, potentially even reversing past environmental damage.
Pollution Elimination: Advanced filtration and purification systems to cleanse air and water on a global scale.

3. Sustainable Living:

Smart Cities 2.0: Urban centers designed for ultimate efficiency, with integrated systems for energy, transportation, and resource management.
Vertical Farms & Lab-Grown Food: High-tech agriculture in urban areas and lab-grown protein to feed a growing population sustainably.
Sustainable Transportation: Advanced electric vehicles, high-speed rail, and potentially even personal air mobility, all powered by clean energy.
Biomanufacturing: Using biological systems to produce materials and products sustainably, reducing reliance on fossil fuels.
Self-Healing Infrastructure: Materials that can repair themselves, extending the lifespan of buildings, roads, and other structures.

4. Key Considerations:

Ethical Implications: With great technological power comes great responsibility. Ensuring equitable access and preventing misuse will be crucial.
Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity will require unprecedented international collaboration.
Adaptability: The ability to adapt to unforeseen challenges and technological disruptions will be essential for long-term sustainability.

It’s important to remember that this is speculative. The actual sustainable technologies of 4100 could be very different from what we imagine today. However, by focusing on innovation, collaboration, and ethical considerations, we can increase the chances of creating a sustainable future for all.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4100 ?

In the context of the year 4100, the need for sustainable technology would be universal. It wouldn’t be a matter of choice, but a necessity for survival and well-being. Here’s who would be fundamentally reliant on it:

Human Civilization: The entire human population would depend on sustainable technology for basic needs like energy, food, water, shelter, and transportation. With potential challenges like climate change, resource depletion, and population growth, sustainable solutions would be crucial for maintaining a habitable planet and a thriving society.
Ecosystems: Sustainable technology would play a vital role in preserving and restoring natural ecosystems. This includes technologies for pollution control, biodiversity conservation, and environmental remediation. Healthy ecosystems are essential for providing clean air, water, and other resources that humans depend on.
Future Generations: The concept of sustainability inherently emphasizes the responsibility to future generations. Sustainable technology would ensure that resources and a healthy environment are available for those who come after us.
All Living Organisms: In a broader sense, sustainable technology would be necessary for the well-being of all living organisms on Earth. This includes plants, animals, and microorganisms, as they are all interconnected and play a role in maintaining a healthy planet.

Essentially, sustainable technology in 4100 would be the foundation upon which civilization and life on Earth would exist. It would be an integral part of daily life, ensuring a harmonious relationship between humans and the natural world.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4100 ?

The need for sustainable technology in 4100 wouldn’t be a specific event or date, but rather an ongoing and continuous requirement. It’s not a “when” but a “forever” situation. Here’s why:

Resource Limits: Even with advanced technology, Earth’s resources are finite. Sustainable practices would be essential to manage these resources responsibly and avoid depletion.
Environmental Pressures: Climate change, pollution, and ecosystem degradation are ongoing challenges. Sustainable technology would be needed to mitigate these issues and maintain a healthy planet.
Population Growth: If the human population continues to grow, sustainable solutions would be necessary to provide for everyone’s needs without exceeding the planet’s carrying capacity.
Technological Evolution: Technology itself evolves. New challenges and opportunities would arise, requiring continuous innovation in sustainable solutions.

Essentially, sustainable technology in 4100 would be the foundation upon which society functions. It would be an integral part of daily life, ensuring a balance between human needs and the health of the planet.

It’s not about a specific point in time when it becomes “required,” but rather an understanding that sustainable practices are essential for long-term survival and well-being.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4100 ?

The need for sustainable technology in 4100 would be universal, applying to every corner of the planet and potentially even beyond. It wouldn’t be a matter of “where” but rather “everywhere.” Here’s a breakdown:

Global Ecosystems: From the deepest oceans to the highest mountain peaks, sustainable technologies would be essential for maintaining healthy ecosystems and preserving biodiversity. This includes pollution control, habitat restoration, and climate change mitigation.
Human Settlements: Cities, towns, and even individual dwellings would rely on sustainable technologies for energy, water, waste management, and transportation. Sustainable urban planning and infrastructure would be crucial for creating livable and resource-efficient communities.
Agriculture and Food Production: Sustainable agriculture would be essential for feeding a growing population without depleting resources or harming the environment. This includes practices like precision farming, vertical farming, and lab-grown food.
Industry and Manufacturing: Sustainable manufacturing processes would be necessary to reduce waste, minimize pollution, and conserve resources. This includes closed-loop systems, biomanufacturing, and the use of sustainable materials.
Transportation Networks: Sustainable transportation systems would be essential for moving people and goods efficiently and without contributing to pollution or climate change. This includes electric vehicles, high-speed rail, and potentially even space travel.
Space (if colonized): If humanity expands beyond Earth, sustainable technologies would be even more critical for establishing self-sustaining colonies and managing resources in extraterrestrial environments.

In short, the need for sustainable technology in 4100 would be all-encompassing, touching every aspect of human life and the natural world. It wouldn’t be a matter of “where” it’s needed, but rather a fundamental requirement for the continued existence and well-being of life on Earth (and potentially beyond).

How is required Sustainable technology of 4100 ?

The “how” of sustainable technology in 4100 is complex and multifaceted, but it boils down to a fundamental shift in how humanity interacts with the planet and utilizes resources. It wouldn’t be about individual technologies alone, but an integrated approach. Here’s a conceptual outline:

Systems Thinking: Moving beyond isolated solutions to interconnected systems. Sustainable technology wouldn’t just be about a better battery; it would be about integrated energy systems, smart grids, and resource management loops that minimize waste and maximize efficiency.
Bio-Integrated Technologies: Mimicking nature’s cycles and processes. This could involve biomanufacturing (using biological systems to create materials), closed-loop resource systems (where waste is continuously recycled), and technologies that work in harmony with ecosystems.
Advanced Materials Science: Developing materials that are durable, renewable, recyclable, and even self-healing. This could revolutionize construction, manufacturing, and countless other industries.
Artificial Intelligence and Automation: Leveraging AI and automation to optimize resource use, manage complex systems, and develop new sustainable solutions. This could involve smart cities, precision agriculture, and automated recycling systems.
Decentralization and Localization: Shifting away from centralized systems towards more localized and distributed solutions. This could involve community-based energy generation, local food production, and decentralized manufacturing.
Global Collaboration: Sharing knowledge, resources, and technologies across borders. Addressing global challenges like climate change requires international cooperation and a shared commitment to sustainability.
Ethical Considerations: Integrating ethical frameworks into the development and deployment of sustainable technologies. This ensures that these technologies are used responsibly and equitably, benefiting all of humanity and the planet.
Continuous Innovation: Fostering a culture of continuous learning and innovation. Sustainable technology is not a destination but a journey, requiring ongoing research, development, and adaptation.
Behavioral Change: Technological solutions alone are not enough. Sustainable technology would need to be coupled with changes in human behavior, consumption patterns, and social values.

In essence, the “how” of sustainable technology in 4100 would involve a holistic and integrated approach, combining advanced technologies with systems thinking, ethical considerations, and a fundamental shift in how humanity relates to the planet. It would be a continuous process of innovation, adaptation, and collaboration, ensuring a thriving future for all.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4100 ?

It’s impossible to provide a real case study of sustainable technology in 4100, as that’s far in the future. However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on the trends and possibilities we’ve discussed. Think of it as a science fiction scenario grounded in plausible extrapolations of current technology:

Case Study: The Integrated Bioregenerative City of Aurora (4100)

Setting: Aurora is a self-contained city located in a formerly arid region, now made habitable through advanced terraforming technologies.

Challenge: Maintaining a thriving population while minimizing environmental impact and maximizing resource efficiency.

Solution: Aurora is built on the principles of integrated bioregenerative systems:

Energy: Aurora is powered by a combination of space-based solar energy beamed to the city and locally generated fusion power. Excess energy is stored in advanced, hyper-efficient energy storage systems.
Food: Food is produced in vertical farms integrated into the city’s architecture and through advanced hydroponic and aeroponic systems. Lab-grown protein supplements traditional agriculture. Waste from food production is composted and used to fertilize the vertical farms, creating a closed-loop system.
Water: Water is harvested from the atmosphere using advanced atmospheric condensers and recycled through sophisticated purification systems. Wastewater is treated and reused for irrigation and other non-potable purposes.
Waste Management: “Waste” as we understand it no longer exists. All materials are broken down at the molecular level and reused in a continuous cycle of resource regeneration. Biomanufacturing plays a key role, creating new products from recycled materials.
Air Quality: Air is constantly filtered and purified using advanced biofiltration systems, mimicking the cleansing action of forests. CO2 is captured and used in the vertical farms or converted into other valuable products.
Transportation: Personal transportation within Aurora is primarily via electric vehicles powered by the city’s renewable energy grid. High-speed rail connects Aurora to other sustainable cities.
Governance: AI-powered systems manage the city’s infrastructure, optimizing resource allocation and predicting potential problems. Human oversight ensures that these systems are used ethically and in the best interests of the citizens.

Results:

Aurora is a highly sustainable and resource-efficient city, with a minimal environmental footprint.
Its citizens enjoy a high quality of life, with access to clean energy, abundant food, and a healthy environment.
The city is resilient to environmental changes and resource scarcity.
Aurora serves as a model for other sustainable cities around the world.

Key Technologies Featured:

Space-based solar power
Fusion power
Hyper-efficient energy storage
Vertical farming
Hydroponics and aeroponics
Advanced water purification and recycling
Molecular recycling
Biomanufacturing
Biofiltration
AI-powered infrastructure management

Conclusion:

This hypothetical case study illustrates how a combination of advanced technologies and integrated systems thinking could create a truly sustainable city in the future. While the technologies described may seem futuristic today, they represent plausible extrapolations of current trends and offer a glimpse into the possibilities of sustainable technology in 4100. The key takeaway is that sustainability is not just about individual gadgets but about creating interconnected systems that work in harmony with the planet.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4100 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 4100: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 4100. Building upon current scientific trends and addressing future global challenges, it envisions a world where technological advancements are deeply integrated with ecological principles, ensuring a thriving and equitable future for humanity and the planet. The paper examines key areas of innovation, including energy, resource management, environmental restoration, sustainable infrastructure, and biotechnology, while also considering the crucial ethical and societal implications of such advancements.

1. Introduction:

The challenges facing humanity today – climate change, resource depletion, and environmental degradation – necessitate a fundamental shift towards sustainable practices. Looking ahead to 4100, we envision a world where sustainable technology is not merely an option, but the very foundation upon which civilization is built. This paper explores potential technological advancements and societal transformations that could lead to such a future.

2. Energy Revolution:

Fusion Power: The realization of practical fusion power would provide a near-limitless source of clean energy, revolutionizing energy production and eliminating reliance on fossil fuels.
Space-Based Solar: Harnessing solar energy from space and beaming it to Earth would provide a continuous and abundant power supply, unaffected by weather patterns or day-night cycles.
Advanced Energy Storage: Hyper-efficient energy storage technologies, far surpassing current battery capabilities, would be essential for balancing intermittent renewable sources and ensuring a stable energy supply.

3. Resource Management & Circular Economy:

Molecular Recycling: Advanced processes capable of breaking down materials at the molecular level and reusing them would create a true circular economy, eliminating waste and conserving resources.
Space Resource Utilization: Mining asteroids and other celestial bodies for rare elements and essential resources could reduce our dependence on Earth’s finite reserves.
Closed-Loop Systems: Mimicking natural ecosystems, industrial processes would be designed as closed-loop systems, where all byproducts are recycled and reused, minimizing environmental impact.

4. Environmental Restoration & Geoengineering:

Atmospheric Regeneration: Advanced carbon capture and sequestration technologies, coupled with potential geoengineering solutions, would actively reverse the effects of climate change and restore atmospheric balance.
Ecosystem Restoration: Technologies to repair damaged ecosystems, restore biodiversity, and even reverse past environmental damage would be crucial for maintaining a healthy planet.
Pollution Elimination: Advanced filtration and purification systems would cleanse air and water on a global scale, creating a pollution-free environment.

5. Sustainable Infrastructure & Urban Planning:

Smart Cities 2.0: Urban centers designed for ultimate efficiency, integrating energy, transportation, and resource management systems to minimize environmental impact and maximize quality of life.
Vertical Farms & Sustainable Agriculture: High-tech vertical farms and other sustainable agricultural practices would ensure food security for a growing population while minimizing land use and environmental impact.
Sustainable Transportation: Advanced electric vehicles, high-speed rail networks, and potentially even personal air mobility, all powered by clean energy, would revolutionize transportation.

6. Biotechnology & Materials Science:

Biomanufacturing: Using biological systems to produce materials and products sustainably would reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and create biodegradable alternatives.
Self-Healing Materials: Materials capable of self-repair would extend the lifespan of infrastructure and reduce maintenance needs.
Biodegradable & Compostable Materials: Widespread use of biodegradable and compostable materials would minimize waste and promote a circular economy.

7. Ethical & Societal Considerations:

Equitable Access: Ensuring that the benefits of sustainable technology are accessible to all, regardless of socioeconomic status or geographic location, is crucial for creating a just and equitable future.
Responsible Innovation: Ethical frameworks must guide the development and deployment of new technologies to prevent unintended consequences and ensure that they are used for the benefit of humanity and the planet.
Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity requires unprecedented international cooperation and a shared commitment to sustainability.

8. Conclusion:

The vision of sustainable technology in 4100 presented in this white paper is ambitious but achievable. By embracing innovation, prioritizing ethical considerations, and fostering global collaboration, we can create a future where humanity and the planet thrive in harmony. The journey towards this future begins today, with a commitment to sustainable practices and a shared vision for a better tomorrow.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4100 ?

It’s fascinating to imagine the industrial applications of sustainable technology in 4100! Here are some potential scenarios, extrapolating from current trends and future possibilities:

1. Manufacturing & Production:

Closed-Loop Biomanufacturing: Factories would essentially become highly efficient biorefineries. Using engineered biological systems, they’d produce everything from materials and chemicals to complex products, all from renewable resources and recycled materials. Waste would be entirely eliminated, as byproducts would be fed back into the production cycle.
Personalized Production: Advanced 3D printing and bioprinting technologies could allow for highly personalized production of goods. Consumers could design their own products, and factories would produce them on demand, minimizing waste and optimizing resource use.
Localized Production: Decentralized manufacturing facilities, powered by renewable energy, could be located closer to consumers, reducing transportation costs and emissions.

2. Resource Extraction & Processing:

Sustainable Mining in Space: Asteroid mining and resource extraction from other celestial bodies could become a major industry, providing access to rare elements and reducing reliance on Earth’s finite resources. This would need to be done with minimal environmental impact on the target celestial bodies.
Ocean Mining with Ecosystem Preservation: If ocean mining is still necessary, it would be conducted with extreme care to avoid damaging fragile marine ecosystems. Autonomous underwater vehicles and advanced sensing technologies could be used to selectively extract resources with minimal disruption.

3. Energy & Infrastructure:

Fusion-Powered Industries: Industries that require high temperatures or large amounts of energy, such as steel production or cement manufacturing, would be powered by clean and abundant fusion energy.
Smart Grids & Energy Optimization: AI-powered smart grids would optimize energy distribution and consumption across industries, ensuring maximum efficiency and minimizing waste.
Self-Healing Infrastructure: Industries that rely on extensive infrastructure, such as transportation or communication networks, would benefit from self-healing materials that can automatically repair damage, reducing maintenance costs and downtime.

4. Agriculture & Food Production:

Vertical Farms & Automated Agriculture: Large-scale vertical farms, integrated into urban areas, would produce food efficiently and sustainably, using minimal land and water resources. Automated systems would manage planting, harvesting, and other tasks.
Precision Agriculture & Resource Optimization: Advanced sensors and AI-powered systems would optimize resource use in agriculture, minimizing water and fertilizer use while maximizing yields.

5. Environmental Remediation & Restoration:

Atmospheric Regeneration Industry: Industries focused on capturing and sequestering CO2 from the atmosphere could play a vital role in reversing climate change.
Ecosystem Restoration Technologies: Advanced biotechnologies could be used to restore damaged ecosystems, repair pollution, and even reverse past environmental damage.

Key Considerations:

Automation & Labor: With increased automation, the nature of work would likely change. Industries would need to adapt to a workforce that focuses on design, management, and innovation rather than manual labor.
Ethical Implications: Ensuring that these advanced technologies are used responsibly and equitably would be crucial. Industries would need to prioritize ethical considerations and avoid unintended consequences.

The industrial applications of sustainable technology in 4100 would likely be characterized by a deep integration of technology and ecological principles, creating a circular economy where resources are used efficiently and waste is minimized. This would require a fundamental shift in industrial practices, prioritizing sustainability and long-term well-being over short-term profits.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4100 ?

It’s exciting to think about the research and development that would drive sustainable technology in 4100! Here’s a glimpse into potential areas of focus, building on current scientific frontiers:

1. Fundamental Science:

Advanced Physics: Exploring the fundamental laws of the universe to unlock new energy sources (like harnessing zero-point energy or manipulating spacetime) and develop revolutionary materials.
Quantum Computing: Developing powerful quantum computers to simulate complex systems, design new materials, and optimize energy networks with unprecedented precision.
Consciousness and AI: Investigating the nature of consciousness to create truly intelligent AI systems that can help solve complex problems and manage sustainable systems effectively.

2. Energy & Resource Management:

Fusion Energy Breakthroughs: Overcoming the remaining challenges of fusion power to achieve efficient and commercially viable fusion reactors.
Exotic Energy Sources: Exploring more unconventional energy sources like zero-point energy or other theoretical possibilities.
Advanced Materials: Discovering new materials with extraordinary properties, such as superconductivity at room temperature, extreme strength, or self-healing capabilities.
Resource Alchemy: Developing technologies to transform waste into valuable resources at the molecular level, achieving true circularity.
Space Resource Utilization: Researching efficient and sustainable methods for mining resources from asteroids and other celestial bodies.

3. Environmental Science & Geoengineering:

Climate Change Reversal: Investigating advanced geoengineering techniques to actively reverse the effects of climate change and restore Earth’s atmospheric balance.
Ecosystem Restoration: Developing technologies to repair damaged ecosystems, restore biodiversity, and even reverse past environmental damage.
Pollution Elimination: Researching advanced filtration and purification systems to cleanse air and water on a global scale.

4. Biotechnology & Biomanufacturing:

Synthetic Biology: Engineering new biological systems to produce materials, fuels, and other products sustainably.
Biomanufacturing at Scale: Developing efficient and scalable biomanufacturing processes to produce a wide range of goods from renewable resources.
Genetic Engineering: Exploring the potential of genetic engineering to improve crop yields, enhance nutritional value, and create disease-resistant plants.

5. Artificial Intelligence & Automation:

Advanced AI Systems: Developing highly intelligent AI systems capable of complex problem-solving, decision-making, and autonomous operation.
Robotics & Automation: Creating advanced robots and automated systems for use in manufacturing, agriculture, environmental remediation, and other industries.

6. Social Sciences & Ethics:

Sustainable Societies: Researching the social, economic, and political factors that contribute to sustainable societies.
Ethical Frameworks: Developing robust ethical frameworks to guide the development and deployment of new technologies and ensure they are used responsibly.
Global Governance: Exploring new models of global governance to address global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity.

Key Approaches:

Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Fostering collaboration between scientists, engineers, social scientists, and ethicists to address complex challenges.
Open Innovation: Encouraging the sharing of knowledge, data, and technologies across borders to accelerate progress.
Long-Term Vision: Investing in long-term research and development with a focus on sustainability and the well-being of future generations.

The research and development of sustainable technology in 4100 would be a continuous process of exploration, discovery, and innovation. It would require a global effort, driven by a shared commitment to creating a thriving and sustainable future for all.

COURTESY : Voith Group

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 5–6.
^ Zhang, Wei; Li, Binshuai; Xue, Rui; Wang, Chengcheng; Cao, Wei (2021). “A systematic bibliometric review of clean energy transition: Implications for low-carbon development”. PLOS ONE. 16 (12): e0261091. Bibcode:2021PLoSO..1661091Z. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0261091. PMC 8641874. PMID 34860855.
^ United Nations Development Programme 2016, p. 5.
^ “Definitions: energy, sustainability and the future”. OpenLearn. The Open University. Archived from the original on 27 January 2021. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
^ Golus̆in, Popov & Dodić 2013, p. 8.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Hammond, Geoffrey P.; Jones, Craig I. “Sustainability criteria for energy resources and technologies”. In Galarraga, González-Eguino & Markandya (2011), pp. 21–47.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNECE 2020, pp. 3–4.
^ Gunnarsdottir, I.; Davidsdottir, B.; Worrell, E.; Sigurgeirsdottir, S. (May 2021). “Sustainable energy development: History of the concept and emerging themes”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 141: 110770. Bibcode:2021RSERv.14110770G. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110770. hdl:1874/411740.
^ Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 1–2.
^ Vera, Ivan; Langlois, Lucille (2007). “Energy indicators for sustainable development”. Energy. 32 (6): 875–882. Bibcode:2007Ene….32..875V. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2006.08.006.
^ Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 3–5.
^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2021). “What are the safest and cleanest sources of energy?”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 15 January 2024. Data sources: Markandya & Wilkinson (2007); UNSCEAR (2008; 2018); Sovacool et al. (2016); IPCC AR5 (2014); Pehl et al. (2017); Ember Energy (2021).
^ Jump up to:^a ^b United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. 46.
^ “Global Historical Emissions”. Climate Watch. Archived from the original on 4 June 2021. Retrieved 19 August 2021.
^ Ge, Mengpin; Friedrich, Johannes; Vigna, Leandro (August 2021). “4 Charts Explain Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Countries and Sectors”. World Resources Institute. Archived from the original on 19 August 2021. Retrieved 19 August 2021.
^ “The Paris Agreement”. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Archived from the original on 19 March 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
^ Watts, Nick; Amann, Markus; Arnell, Nigel; Ayeb-Karlsson, Sonja; et al. (2021). “The 2020 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: responding to converging crises” (PDF). The Lancet. 397 (10269): 151. Bibcode:2021Lanc..397..129W. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32290-X. PMC 7616803. PMID 33278353.
^ “Every breath you take: The staggering, true cost of air pollution”. United Nations Development Programme. 4 June 2019. Archived from the original on 20 April 2021. Retrieved 4 May 2021.
^ “New WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines aim to save millions of lives from air pollution”. World Health Organization. 22 September 2021. Archived from the original on 23 September 2021. Retrieved 16 October 2021.
^ “Acid Rain and Water”. United States Geological Survey. Archived from the original on 27 June 2021. Retrieved 14 October 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b World Health Organization 2018, p. 16.
^ “Ambient (outdoor) air pollution”. World Health Organization. 22 September 2021. Archived from the original on 8 October 2021. Retrieved 22 October 2021.
^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2019). “Access to Energy”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 1 April 2021. Retrieved 1 April 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b World Health Organization 2016, pp. vii–xiv.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 118.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, pp. 470–472.
^ Tester et al. 2012, p. 504.
^ Kessides, Ioannis N.; Toman, Michael (28 July 2011). “The Global Energy Challenge”. World Bank. Archived from the original on 25 July 2019. Retrieved 27 September 2019.
^ Morris et al. 2015, pp. 24–27.
^ “Access to clean cooking”. SDG7: Data and Projections. IEA. October 2020. Archived from the original on 6 December 2019. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
^ IEA 2021, p. 167.
^ Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu (20 July 2022). “Winners and losers of energy sustainability—Global assessment of the Sustainable Development Goals”. Science of the Total Environment. 831. 154945. Bibcode:2022ScTEn.83154945S. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154945. hdl:11250/3023660. PMID 35367559.
^ Deputy Secretary-General (6 June 2018). “Sustainable Development Goal 7 on Reliable, Modern Energy ‘Golden Thread’ Linking All Other Targets, Deputy-Secretary-General Tells High-Level Panel” (Press release). United Nations. Archived from the original on 17 May 2021. Retrieved 19 March 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Goal 7: Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all”. SDG Tracker. Archived from the original on 2 February 2021. Retrieved 12 March 2021.
^ “Energy use per person”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 28 November 2020. Retrieved 16 July 2021.
^ “Europe 2030: Energy saving to become “first fuel””. EU Science Hub. European Commission. 25 February 2016. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
^ Motherway, Brian (19 December 2019). “Energy efficiency is the first fuel, and demand for it needs to grow”. IEA. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
^ “Energy Efficiency 2018: Analysis and outlooks to 2040”. IEA. October 2018. Archived from the original on 29 September 2020.
^ Fernandez Pales, Araceli; Bouckaert, Stéphanie; Abergel, Thibaut; Goodson, Timothy (10 June 2021). “Net zero by 2050 hinges on a global push to increase energy efficiency”. IEA. Archived from the original on 20 July 2021. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA 2021, pp. 68–69.
^ Mundaca, Luis; Ürge-Vorsatz, Diana; Wilson, Charlie (February 2019). “Demand-side approaches for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C”. Energy Efficiency. 12 (2): 343–362. Bibcode:2019EnEff..12..343M. doi:10.1007/s12053-018-9722-9.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA, IRENA, United Nations Statistics Division, World Bank, World Health Organization 2021, p. 12.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA, IRENA, United Nations Statistics Division, World Bank, World Health Organization 2021, p. 11.
^ Brockway, Paul E.; Sorrell, Steve; Semieniuk, Gregor; Heun, Matthew Kuperus; Court, Victor (May 2021). “Energy efficiency and economy-wide rebound effects: A review of the evidence and its implications”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 141: 110781. Bibcode:2021RSERv.14110781B. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110781.
^ “Energy Efficiency 2019”. IEA. November 2019. Archived from the original on 13 October 2020. Retrieved 21 September 2020.
^ Bond, Kingsmill; Butler-Sloss, Sam; Lovins, Amory; Speelman, Laurens; Topping, Nigel (13 June 2023). “Report / 2023 / X-Change: Electricity / On track for disruption”. Rocky Mountain Institute. Archived from the original on 13 July 2023.
^ Source for data beginning in 2017: “Renewable Energy Market Update Outlook for 2023 and 2024” (PDF). International Energy Agency. June 2023. p. 19. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 July 2023. IEA. CC BY 4.0. ● Source for data through 2016: “Renewable Energy Market Update / Outlook for 2021 and 2022” (PDF). IEA.org. International Energy Agency. May 2021. p. 8. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 March 2023. IEA. Licence: CC BY 4.0
^ “World Energy Investment 2023 / Overview and key findings”. International Energy Agency (IEA). 25 May 2023. Archived from the original on 31 May 2023. Global energy investment in clean energy and in fossil fuels, 2015-2023 (chart) — From pages 8 and 12 of World Energy Investment 2023 (archive).
^ IEA 2007, p. 3.
^ Santangeli, Andrea; Toivonen, Tuuli; Pouzols, Federico Montesino; Pogson, Mark; Hastings, Astley; Smith, Pete; Moilanen, Atte (September 2016). “Global change synergies and trade-offs between renewable energy and biodiversity”. GCB Bioenergy. 8 (5): 941–951. Bibcode:2016GCBBi…8..941S. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12299. hdl:2164/6138.
^ Rehbein, Jose A.; Watson, James E. M.; Lane, Joe L.; Sonter, Laura J.; Venter, Oscar; Atkinson, Scott C.; Allan, James R. (May 2020). “Renewable energy development threatens many globally important biodiversity areas”. Global Change Biology. 26 (5): 3040–3051. Bibcode:2020GCBio..26.3040R. doi:10.1111/gcb.15067. PMID 32133726.
^ Ritchie, Hannah (2019). “Renewable Energy”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 4 August 2020. Retrieved 31 July 2020.
^ Renewables 2020 Analysis and forecast to 2025 (PDF) (Report). IEA. 2020. p. 12. Archived from the original on 26 April 2021.
^ “Access to electricity”. SDG7: Data and Projections. IEA. 2020. Archived from the original on 13 May 2021. Retrieved 5 May 2021.
^ “Infrastructure Solutions: The power of purchase agreements”. European Investment Bank. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
^ “Renewable Power – Analysis”. IEA. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
^ “Global Electricity Review 2022”. Ember. 29 March 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
^ “Renewable Energy and Electricity | Sustainable Energy | Renewable Energy – World Nuclear Association”. world-nuclear.org. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA (2022), Renewables 2022, IEA, Paris https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2022, License: CC BY 4.0
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 406.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Wind & Solar Share in Electricity Production Data”. Global Energy Statistical Yearbook 2021. Enerdata. Archived from the original on 19 July 2019. Retrieved 13 June 2021.
^ Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 34–35.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Levelized Cost of Energy and of Storage”. Lazard. 19 October 2020. Archived from the original on 25 February 2021. Retrieved 26 February 2021.
^ Victoria, Marta; Haegel, Nancy; Peters, Ian Marius; Sinton, Ron; Jäger-Waldau, Arnulf; del Cañizo, Carlos; Breyer, Christian; Stocks, Matthew; Blakers, Andrew; Kaizuka, Izumi; Komoto, Keiichi; Smets, Arno (May 2021). “Solar photovoltaics is ready to power a sustainable future”. Joule. 5 (5): 1041–1056. Bibcode:2021Joule…5.1041V. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2021.03.005.
^ IRENA 2021, pp. 19, 22.
^ Goetz, Katelyn P.; Taylor, Alexander D.; Hofstetter, Yvonne J.; Vaynzof, Yana (13 January 2021). “Sustainability in Perovskite Solar Cells”. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 13 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1021/acsami.0c17269. PMID 33372760.
^ Xu, Yan; Li, Jinhui; Tan, Quanyin; Peters, Anesia Lauren; Yang, Congren (May 2018). “Global status of recycling waste solar panels: A review”. Waste Management. 75: 450–458. Bibcode:2018WaMan..75..450X. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.01.036. PMID 29472153.
^ Tian, Xueyu; Stranks, Samuel D.; You, Fengqi (31 July 2020). “Life cycle energy use and environmental implications of high-performance perovskite tandem solar cells”. Science Advances. 6 (31): eabb0055. Bibcode:2020SciA….6…55T. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb0055. PMC 7399695. PMID 32789177.
^ Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 35–36.
^ “Solar energy”. International Renewable Energy Agency. Archived from the original on 13 May 2021. Retrieved 5 June 2021.
^ REN21 2020, p. 124.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 366.
^ “What are the advantages and disadvantages of offshore wind farms?”. American Geosciences Institute. 12 May 2016. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
^ Szarka 2007, p. 176.
^ Wang, Shifeng; Wang, Sicong (September 2015). “Impacts of wind energy on environment: A review”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 49: 437–443. Bibcode:2015RSERv..49..437W. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.137.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 215.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 213.
^ Huang, Yu-Fong; Gan, Xing-Jia; Chiueh, Pei-Te (March 2017). “Life cycle assessment and net energy analysis of offshore wind power systems”. Renewable Energy. 102: 98–106. Bibcode:2017REne..102…98H. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2016.10.050.
^ Belton, Padraig (7 February 2020). “What happens to all the old wind turbines?”. BBC. Archived from the original on 23 February 2021. Retrieved 27 February 2021.
^ Smil 2017b, p. 286.
^ REN21 2021, p. 21.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Moran, Emilio F.; Lopez, Maria Claudia; Moore, Nathan; Müller, Norbert; Hyndman, David W. (20 November 2018). “Sustainable hydropower in the 21st century”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115 (47): 11891–11898. Bibcode:2018PNAS..11511891M. doi:10.1073/pnas.1809426115. PMC 6255148. PMID 30397145.
^ Kumar, A.; Schei, T.; Ahenkorah, A.; Caceres Rodriguez, R. et al. “Hydropower“. In IPCC (2011), pp. 451, 462, 488.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Schlömer, S.; Bruckner, T.; Fulton, L.; Hertwich, E. et al. “Annex III: Technology-specific cost and performance parameters“. In IPCC (2014), p. 1335.
^ Almeida, Rafael M.; Shi, Qinru; Gomes-Selman, Jonathan M.; Wu, Xiaojian; Xue, Yexiang; Angarita, Hector; Barros, Nathan; Forsberg, Bruce R.; García-Villacorta, Roosevelt; Hamilton, Stephen K.; Melack, John M.; Montoya, Mariana; Perez, Guillaume; Sethi, Suresh A.; Gomes, Carla P.; Flecker, Alexander S. (19 September 2019). “Reducing greenhouse gas emissions of Amazon hydropower with strategic dam planning”. Nature Communications. 10 (1): 4281. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12179-5. PMC 6753097. PMID 31537792.
^ László, Erika (1981). “Geothermal Energy: An Old Ally”. Ambio. 10 (5): 248–249. JSTOR 4312703.
^ REN21 2020, p. 97.
^ “Geothermal Energy Information and Facts”. National Geographic. 19 October 2009. Archived from the original on 8 August 2021. Retrieved 8 August 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2020). “Energy mix”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 2 July 2021. Retrieved 9 July 2021.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, pp. 222, 228.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, pp. 228–229.
^ “Biomass explained”. US Energy Information Administration. 8 June 2021. Archived from the original on 15 September 2021. Retrieved 13 September 2021.
^ Kopetz, Heinz (7 February 2013). “Build a biomass energy market”. Nature. 494 (7435): 29–31. doi:10.1038/494029a. PMID 23389528.
^ Demirbas, Ayhan (August 2008). “Biofuels sources, biofuel policy, biofuel economy and global biofuel projections”. Energy Conversion and Management. 49 (8): 2106–2116. Bibcode:2008ECM….49.2106D. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2008.02.020.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Correa, Diego F.; Beyer, Hawthorne L.; Fargione, Joseph E.; Hill, Jason D.; Possingham, Hugh P.; Thomas-Hall, Skye R.; Schenk, Peer M. (June 2019). “Towards the implementation of sustainable biofuel production systems”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 107: 250–263. Bibcode:2019RSERv.107..250C. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.005.
^ Daley, Jason (24 April 2018). “The EPA Declared That Burning Wood Is Carbon Neutral. It’s Actually a Lot More Complicated”. Smithsonian Magazine. Archived from the original on 30 June 2021. Retrieved 14 September 2021.
^ Tester et al. 2012, p. 512.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Smil 2017a, p. 162.
^ World Health Organization 2016, p. 73.
^ IPCC 2014, p. 616.
^ “Biofuels explained: Ethanol”. US Energy Information Administration. 18 June 2020. Archived from the original on 14 May 2021. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
^ Foley, Jonathan (5 March 2013). “It’s Time to Rethink America’s Corn System”. Scientific American. Archived from the original on 3 January 2020. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
^ Ayompe, Lacour M.; Schaafsma, M.; Egoh, Benis N. (January 2021). “Towards sustainable palm oil production: The positive and negative impacts on ecosystem services and human wellbeing”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 278: 123914. Bibcode:2021JCPro.27823914A. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123914.
^ Lustgarten, Abrahm (20 November 2018). “Palm Oil Was Supposed to Help Save the Planet. Instead It Unleashed a Catastrophe”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 17 May 2019. Retrieved 15 May 2019.
^ Smil 2017a, p. 161.
^ National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2019, p. 3.
^ REN21 2021, pp. 113–116.
^ “The Role of Gas: Key Findings”. IEA. July 2019. Archived from the original on 1 September 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
^ “Natural gas and the environment”. US Energy Information Administration. Archived from the original on 2 April 2021. Retrieved 28 March 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Storrow, Benjamin. “Methane Leaks Erase Some of the Climate Benefits of Natural Gas”. Scientific American. Retrieved 31 May 2023.
^ Plumer, Brad (26 June 2019). “As Coal Fades in the U.S., Natural Gas Becomes the Climate Battleground”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 23 September 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
^ Gürsan, C.; de Gooyert, V. (March 2021). “The systemic impact of a transition fuel: Does natural gas help or hinder the energy transition?”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 138: 110552. Bibcode:2021RSERv.13810552G. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110552. hdl:2066/228782.
^ Budinis, Sara; Krevor, Samuel; Dowell, Niall Mac; Brandon, Nigel; Hawkes, Adam (November 2018). “An assessment of CCS costs, barriers and potential”. Energy Strategy Reviews. 22: 61–81. Bibcode:2018EneSR..22…61B. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2018.08.003.
^ “Zero-emission carbon capture and storage in power plants using higher capture rates”. IEA. 7 January 2021. Archived from the original on 30 March 2021. Retrieved 14 March 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Ritchie, Hannah (10 February 2020). “What are the safest and cleanest sources of energy?”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 29 November 2020. Retrieved 14 March 2021.
^ Evans, Simon (8 December 2017). “Solar, wind and nuclear have ‘amazingly low’ carbon footprints, study finds”. Carbon Brief. Archived from the original on 16 March 2021. Retrieved 15 March 2021.
^ IPCC 2018, 5.4.1.2.
^ IPCC AR6 WG3 2022, p. 38.
^ “Global Status Report 2024”. Global CCS Institute. pp. 57–58. Retrieved 19 October 2024. The report lists 50 facilities, of which 3 are direct air capture facilities and 3 are transport/storage facilities
^ Roser, Max (10 December 2020). “The world’s energy problem”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 21 July 2021. Retrieved 21 July 2021.
^ Rhodes, Richard (19 July 2018). “Why Nuclear Power Must Be Part of the Energy Solution”. Yale Environment 360. Yale School of the Environment. Archived from the original on 9 August 2021. Retrieved 24 July 2021.
^ “Nuclear Power in the World Today”. World Nuclear Association. June 2021. Archived from the original on 16 July 2021. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
^ Bailey, Ronald (10 May 2023). “New study: Nuclear power is humanity’s greenest energy option”. Reason.com. Retrieved 22 May 2023.
^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2020). “Nuclear Energy”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 20 July 2021. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
^ MacKay 2008, p. 162.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Gill, Matthew; Livens, Francis; Peakman, Aiden (2014). “Nuclear Fission”. Future Energy. pp. 135–149. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102886-5.00007-4. ISBN 978-0-08-102886-5.
^ Muellner, Nikolaus; Arnold, Nikolaus; Gufler, Klaus; Kromp, Wolfgang; Renneberg, Wolfgang; Liebert, Wolfgang (August 2021). “Nuclear energy – The solution to climate change?”. Energy Policy. 155: 112363. Bibcode:2021EnPol.15512363M. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112363.
^ IPCC 2018, 2.4.2.1.
^ Timmer, John (21 November 2020). “Why are nuclear plants so expensive? Safety’s only part of the story”. Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 28 April 2021. Retrieved 17 March 2021.
^ Technical assessment of nuclear energy with respect to the ‘do no significant harm’ criteria of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (‘Taxonomy Regulation’) (PDF) (Report). European Commission Joint Research Centre. 2021. p. 53. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 April 2021.
^ Locatelli, Giorgio; Mignacca, Benito (2020). “Small Modular Nuclear Reactors”. Future Energy. pp. 151–169. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102886-5.00008-6. ISBN 978-0-08-102886-5.
^ McGrath, Matt (6 November 2019). “Nuclear fusion is ‘a question of when, not if'”. BBC. Archived from the original on 25 January 2021. Retrieved 13 February 2021.
^ Amos, Jonathan (9 February 2022). “Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy”. BBC. Archived from the original on 1 March 2022. Retrieved 10 February 2022.
^ “Energy Transition Investment Now On Par with Fossil Fuel”. Bloomberg NEF (New Energy Finance). 10 February 2023. Archived from the original on 27 March 2023.
^ Jaccard 2020, pp. 202–203, Chapter 11 – “Renewables Have Won”.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d IPCC 2014, 7.11.3.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 106–110.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Evans, Simon; Gabbatiss, Josh (30 November 2020). “In-depth Q&A: Does the world need hydrogen to solve climate change?”. Carbon Brief. Archived from the original on 1 December 2020. Retrieved 1 December 2020.
^ Jaccard 2020, p. 203, Chapter 11 – “Renewables Have Won”.
^ “Reaching net zero emissions demands faster innovation, but we’ve already come a long way – Analysis”. International Energy Agency. 13 November 2023. Retrieved 30 April 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA 2021, p. 15.
^ “Innovation – Energy System”. International Energy Agency. Retrieved 30 April 2024.
^ World Health Organization 2018, Executive Summary.
^ Vandyck, T.; Keramidas, K.; Kitous, A.; Spadaro, J.V.; et al. (2018). “Air quality co-benefits for human health and agriculture counterbalance costs to meet Paris Agreement pledges”. Nature Communications. 9 (1): 4939. Bibcode:2018NatCo…9.4939V. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06885-9. PMC 6250710. PMID 30467311.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations Environment Programme 2019, pp. 46–55.
^ IPCC 2018, p. 97.
^ Hopwood, David (May 2007). “Blueprint for sustainability?”. Refocus. 8 (3): 54–57. doi:10.1016/S1471-0846(07)70068-9.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. 47.
^ “Introduction to System Integration of Renewables”. IEA. Archived from the original on 15 May 2020. Retrieved 30 May 2020.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Blanco, Herib; Faaij, André (January 2018). “A review at the role of storage in energy systems with a focus on Power to Gas and long-term storage” (PDF). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 81: 1049–1086. Bibcode:2018RSERv..81.1049B. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.062.
^ REN21 2020, p. 177.
^ Bloess, Andreas; Schill, Wolf-Peter; Zerrahn, Alexander (February 2018). “Power-to-heat for renewable energy integration: A review of technologies, modeling approaches, and flexibility potentials”. Applied Energy. 212: 1611–1626. Bibcode:2018ApEn..212.1611B. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.073. hdl:10419/200120.
^ IEA 2020, p. 109.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Koohi-Fayegh, S.; Rosen, M.A. (February 2020). “A review of energy storage types, applications and recent developments”. Journal of Energy Storage. 27: 101047. Bibcode:2020JEnSt..2701047K. doi:10.1016/j.est.2019.101047.
^ Katz, Cheryl (17 December 2020). “The batteries that could make fossil fuels obsolete”. BBC. Archived from the original on 11 January 2021. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Climate change and batteries: the search for future power storage solutions” (PDF). Climate change: science and solutions. The Royal Society. 19 May 2021. Archived from the original on 16 October 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
^ Hunt, Julian D.; Byers, Edward; Wada, Yoshihide; Parkinson, Simon; Gernaat, David E. H. J.; Langan, Simon; van Vuuren, Detlef P.; Riahi, Keywan (19 February 2020). “Global resource potential of seasonal pumped hydropower storage for energy and water storage”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 947. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11..947H. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14555-y. PMC 7031375. PMID 32075965.
^ Balaraman, Kavya (12 October 2020). “To batteries and beyond: With seasonal storage potential, hydrogen offers ‘a different ballgame entirely'”. Utility Dive. Archived from the original on 18 January 2021. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
^ Cole, Laura (15 November 2020). “How to cut carbon out of your heating”. BBC. Archived from the original on 27 August 2021. Retrieved 31 August 2021.
^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2020). “Electricity Mix”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 13 October 2021. Retrieved 16 October 2021.
^ IPCC 2018, 2.4.2.2.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 167–169.
^ United Nations Development Programme 2016, p. 30.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Herrington, Richard (24 May 2021). “Mining our green future”. Nature Reviews Materials. 6 (6): 456–458. Bibcode:2021NatRM…6..456H. doi:10.1038/s41578-021-00325-9.
^ Mudd, Gavin M. “Metals and Elements Needed to Support Future Energy Systems”. In Letcher (2020), pp. 723–724.
^ Babbitt, Callie W. (August 2020). “Sustainability perspectives on lithium-ion batteries”. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 22 (6): 1213–1214. Bibcode:2020CTEP…22.1213B. doi:10.1007/s10098-020-01890-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c IPCC AR6 WG3 2022, pp. 91–92.
^ Evans, Simon; Gabbatiss, Josh (30 November 2020). “In-depth Q&A: Does the world need hydrogen to solve climate change?”. Carbon Brief. Archived from the original on 1 December 2020. Retrieved 1 December 2020.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Lewis, Alastair C. (10 June 2021). “Optimising air quality co-benefits in a hydrogen economy: a case for hydrogen-specific standards for NO x emissions”. Environmental Science: Atmospheres. 1 (5): 201–207. Bibcode:2021ESAt….1..201L. doi:10.1039/D1EA00037C. This article incorporates text from this source, which is available under the CC BY 3.0 license.
^ Reed, Stanley; Ewing, Jack (13 July 2021). “Hydrogen Is One Answer to Climate Change. Getting It Is the Hard Part”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 14 July 2021. Retrieved 14 July 2021.
^ IRENA 2019, p. 9.
^ Bonheure, Mike; Vandewalle, Laurien A.; Marin, Guy B.; Van Geem, Kevin M. (March 2021). “Dream or Reality? Electrification of the Chemical Process Industries”. CEP Magazine. American Institute of Chemical Engineers. Archived from the original on 17 July 2021. Retrieved 6 July 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Griffiths, Steve; Sovacool, Benjamin K.; Kim, Jinsoo; Bazilian, Morgan; Uratani, Joao M. (October 2021). “Industrial decarbonization via hydrogen: A critical and systematic review of developments, socio-technical systems and policy options”. Energy Research & Social Science. 80: 102208. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102208.
^ Palys, Matthew J.; Daoutidis, Prodromos (May 2020). “Using hydrogen and ammonia for renewable energy storage: A geographically comprehensive techno-economic study”. Computers & Chemical Engineering. 136: 106785. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106785.
^ IRENA 2021, pp. 12, 22.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 15, 75–76.
^ Kjellberg-Motton, Brendan (7 February 2022). “Steel decarbonisation gathers speed | Argus Media”. www.argusmedia.com. Retrieved 7 September 2023.
^ Blank, Thomas; Molly, Patrick (January 2020). “Hydrogen’s Decarbonization Impact for Industry” (PDF). Rocky Mountain Institute. pp. 2, 7, 8. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 September 2020.
^ Plötz, Patrick (31 January 2022). “Hydrogen technology is unlikely to play a major role in sustainable road transport”. Nature Electronics. 5 (1): 8–10. doi:10.1038/s41928-021-00706-6.
^ Fraser, Simon D.S.; Lock, Karen (December 2011). “Cycling for transport and public health: a systematic review of the effect of the environment on cycling”. European Journal of Public Health. 21 (6): 738–743. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckq145. PMID 20929903.
^ “Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data”. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 12 January 2016. Archived from the original on 5 December 2019. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
^ Bigazzi, Alexander (May 2019). “Comparison of marginal and average emission factors for passenger transportation modes”. Applied Energy. 242: 1460–1466. Bibcode:2019ApEn..242.1460B. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.172.
^ Schäfer, Andreas W.; Yeh, Sonia (20 April 2020). “A holistic analysis of passenger travel energy and greenhouse gas intensities”. Nature Sustainability. 3 (6): 459–462. Bibcode:2020NatSu…3..459S. doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0514-9.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2020, p. xxv.
^ IEA 2021, p. 137.
^ Pucher, John; Buehler, Ralph (2 November 2017). “Cycling towards a more sustainable transport future”. Transport Reviews. 37 (6): 689–694. doi:10.1080/01441647.2017.1340234.
^ Smith, John (22 September 2016). “Sustainable transport”. European Commission. Archived from the original on 22 October 2021. Retrieved 22 October 2021.
^ Knobloch, Florian; Hanssen, Steef V.; Lam, Aileen; Pollitt, Hector; Salas, Pablo; Chewpreecha, Unnada; Huijbregts, Mark A. J.; Mercure, Jean-Francois (23 March 2020). “Net emission reductions from electric cars and heat pumps in 59 world regions over time”. Nature Sustainability. 3 (6): 437–447. Bibcode:2020NatSu…3..437K. doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0488-7. PMC 7308170. PMID 32572385.
^ Bogdanov, Dmitrii; Farfan, Javier; Sadovskaia, Kristina; Aghahosseini, Arman; Child, Michael; Gulagi, Ashish; Oyewo, Ayobami Solomon; de Souza Noel Simas Barbosa, Larissa; Breyer, Christian (6 March 2019). “Radical transformation pathway towards sustainable electricity via evolutionary steps”. Nature Communications. 10 (1). doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08855-1. PMC 6403340. PMID 30842423.
^ Martini, Giorgio; Grigoratos, Theodoros (2014). Non-exhaust traffic related emissions – Brake and tyre wear PM. EUR 26648. Publications Office of the European Union. p. 42. ISBN 978-92-79-38303-8. OCLC 1044281650. Archived from the original on 30 July 2021.
^ Non-exhaust Particulate Emissions from Road Transport. 2020. pp. 8–9. doi:10.1787/4a4dc6ca-en. ISBN 978-92-64-45244-2.
^ “CO₂ performance of new passenger cars in Europe”. www.eea.europa.eu. Retrieved 19 October 2022.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 133–137.
^ “Rail and waterborne – best for low-carbon motorised transport”. European Environment Agency. Archived from the original on 9 October 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
^ Miller, Joe (9 September 2020). “Hydrogen takes a back seat to electric for passenger vehicles”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 20 September 2020. Retrieved 9 September 2020.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 136, 139.
^ Biomass in a low-carbon economy (Report). UK Committee on Climate Change. November 2018. p. 18. Archived from the original on 28 December 2019. Retrieved 28 December 2019.
^ “Buildings”. IEA. Archived from the original on 14 October 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
^ Mortensen, Anders Winther; Mathiesen, Brian Vad; Hansen, Anders Bavnhøj; Pedersen, Sigurd Lauge; Grandal, Rune Duban; Wenzel, Henrik (October 2020). “The role of electrification and hydrogen in breaking the biomass bottleneck of the renewable energy system – A study on the Danish energy system”. Applied Energy. 275: 115331. Bibcode:2020ApEn..27515331M. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115331.
^ Knobloch, Florian; Pollitt, Hector; Chewpreecha, Unnada; Daioglou, Vassilis; Mercure, Jean-Francois (February 2019). “Simulating the deep decarbonisation of residential heating for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C”. Energy Efficiency. 12 (2): 521–550. arXiv:1710.11019. Bibcode:2019EnEff..12..521K. doi:10.1007/s12053-018-9710-0.
^ Alva, Guruprasad; Lin, Yaxue; Fang, Guiyin (February 2018). “An overview of thermal energy storage systems”. Energy. 144: 341–378. Bibcode:2018Ene…144..341A. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.037.
^ Plumer, Brad (30 June 2021). “Are ‘Heat Pumps’ the Answer to Heat Waves? Some Cities Think So”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 10 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
^ Abergel, Thibaut (June 2020). “Heat Pumps”. IEA. Archived from the original on 3 March 2021. Retrieved 12 April 2021.
^ Buffa, Simone; Cozzini, Marco; D’Antoni, Matteo; Baratieri, Marco; et al. (2019). “5th generation district heating and cooling systems: A review of existing cases in Europe”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 104: 504–522. Bibcode:2019RSERv.104..504B. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.059.
^ Lund, Henrik; Werner, Sven; Wiltshire, Robin; Svendsen, Svend; et al. (2014). “4th Generation District Heating (4GDH)”. Energy. 68: 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.089. Archived from the original on 7 March 2021. Retrieved 13 June 2021.
^ Abdolhamidi, Shervin (27 September 2018). “An ancient engineering feat that harnessed the wind”. BBC. Archived from the original on 12 August 2021. Retrieved 12 August 2021.
^ “How cities are using nature to keep heatwaves at bay”. United Nations Environment Programme. 22 July 2020. Archived from the original on 11 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Four Things You Should Know About Sustainable Cooling”. World Bank. 23 May 2019. Archived from the original on 11 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
^ Mastrucci, Alessio; Byers, Edward; Pachauri, Shonali; Rao, Narasimha D. (March 2019). “Improving the SDG energy poverty targets: Residential cooling needs in the Global South”. Energy and Buildings. 186: 405–415. Bibcode:2019EneBu.186..405M. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.01.015.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Smith & Pillarisetti 2017, pp. 145–146.
^ “Cooking appliances”. Natural Resources Canada. 16 January 2013. Archived from the original on 30 July 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2021.
^ World Health Organization; International Energy Agency; Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves; United Nations Development Programme; Energising Development; and World Bank (2018). Accelerating SDG 7 Achievement Policy Brief 02: Achieving Universal Access to Clean and Modern Cooking Fuels, Technologies and Services (PDF) (Report). United Nations. p. 3. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 March 2021.
^ World Health Organization 2016, p. 75.
^ IPCC 2014, p. 29.
^ World Health Organization 2016, p. 12.
^ REN21 2020, p. 40.
^ IEA 2020, p. 135.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. 50.
^ Åhman, Max; Nilsson, Lars J.; Johansson, Bengt (4 July 2017). “Global climate policy and deep decarbonization of energy-intensive industries”. Climate Policy. 17 (5): 634–649. Bibcode:2017CliPo..17..634A. doi:10.1080/14693062.2016.1167009.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. xxiii.
^ IEA 2021, p. 186.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c United Nations Environment Programme 2019, pp. 39–45.
^ Jaccard 2020, p. 109, Chapter 6 – We Must Price Carbon Emissions”.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b United Nations Environment Programme 2019, pp. 28–36.
^ Ciucci, M. (February 2020). “Renewable Energy”. European Parliament. Archived from the original on 4 June 2020. Retrieved 3 June 2020.
^ “State Renewable Portfolio Standards and Goals”. National Conference of State Legislators. 17 April 2020. Archived from the original on 3 June 2020. Retrieved 3 June 2020.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 14–25.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 184–187.
^ IEA 2021, p. 16.
^ Jaccard 2020, pp. 106–109, Chapter 6 – “We Must Price Carbon Emissions”.
^ Plumer, Brad (8 October 2018). “New U.N. Climate Report Says Put a High Price on Carbon”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 27 September 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
^ Green, Jessica F (April 2021). “Does carbon pricing reduce emissions? A review of ex-post analyses”. Environmental Research Letters. 16 (4): 043004. Bibcode:2021ERL….16d3004G. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abdae9.
^ IPCC 2018, 2.5.2.1.
^ State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2019 (PDF) (Report). World Bank. June 2019. pp. 8–11. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1435-8. hdl:10986/29687. ISBN 978-1-4648-1435-8. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 May 2020.
^ “Revenue-Neutral Carbon Tax | Canada”. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Archived from the original on 28 October 2019. Retrieved 28 October 2019.
^ Carr, Mathew (10 October 2018). “How High Does Carbon Need to Be? Somewhere From $20–$27,000”. Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 5 August 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
^ “EAC launches new inquiry weighing up carbon border tax measures”. UK Parliament. 24 September 2021. Archived from the original on 24 September 2021. Retrieved 14 October 2021.
^ Plumer, Brad (14 July 2021). “Europe Is Proposing a Border Carbon Tax. What Is It and How Will It Work?”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 10 September 2021. Retrieved 10 September 2021.
^ Bharti, Bianca (12 August 2021). “Taxing imports of heavy carbon emitters is gaining momentum – and it could hurt Canadian industry: Report”. Financial Post. Archived from the original on 3 October 2021. Retrieved 3 October 2021.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2020, p. vii.
^ IEA 2021, p. 13.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 14–18.
^ IRENA, IEA & REN21 2018, p. 19.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “24 million jobs to open up in the green economy”. International Labour Organization. 14 May 2018. Archived from the original on 2 June 2021. Retrieved 30 May 2021.
^ Catsaros, Oktavia (26 January 2023). “Global Low-Carbon Energy Technology Investment Surges Past $1 Trillion for the First Time”. Bloomberg NEF (New Energy Finance). Figure 1. Archived from the original on 22 May 2023. Defying supply chain disruptions and macroeconomic headwinds, 2022 energy transition investment jumped 31% to draw level with fossil fuels
^ “Global Clean Energy Investment Jumps 17%, Hits $1.8 Trillion in 2023, According to BloombergNEF Report”. BNEF.com. Bloomberg NEF. 30 January 2024. Archived from the original on 28 June 2024. Start years differ by sector but all sectors are present from 2020 onwards.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b 2024 data: “Energy Transition Investment Trends 2025 / Abridged report” (PDF). BloombergNEF. 30 January 2025. p. 9. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 February 2025.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Mazzucato, Mariana; Semieniuk, Gregor (February 2018). “Financing renewable energy: Who is financing what and why it matters”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 127: 8–22. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.021.
^ United Nations Development Programme & United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2019, p. 24.
^ IPCC 2018, p. 96.
^ IEA, IRENA, United Nations Statistics Division, World Bank, World Health Organization 2021, pp. 129, 132.
^ United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2018, p. 54.
^ United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2018, p. 9.
^ Roberts, J. Timmons; Weikmans, Romain; Robinson, Stacy-ann; Ciplet, David; Khan, Mizan; Falzon, Danielle (March 2021). “Rebooting a failed promise of climate finance”. Nature Climate Change. 11 (3): 180–182. Bibcode:2021NatCC..11..180R. doi:10.1038/s41558-021-00990-2.
^ Radwanski, Adam (29 September 2021). “Opinion: As pivotal climate summit approaches, Canada at centre of efforts to repair broken trust among poorer countries”. The Globe and Mail. Archived from the original on 30 September 2021. Retrieved 30 September 2021.
^ “Here are the clean energy innovations that will beat climate change”. European Investment Bank. Retrieved 26 September 2022.
^ “Home”. www.oecd-ilibrary.org. Retrieved 19 October 2022.
^ Bridle, Richard; Sharma, Shruti; Mostafa, Mostafa; Geddes, Anna (June 2019). “Fossil Fuel to Clean Energy Subsidy Swaps: How to pay for an energy revolution” (PDF). International Institute for Sustainable Development. p. iv. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 November 2019.
^ Watts, Nick; Amann, Markus; Arnell, Nigel; Ayeb-Karlsson, Sonja; Belesova, Kristine; Boykoff, Maxwell; Byass, Peter; Cai, Wenjia; Campbell-Lendrum, Diarmid; Capstick, Stuart; Chambers, Jonathan; Dalin, Carole; Daly, Meaghan; Dasandi, Niheer; Davies, Michael; Drummond, Paul; Dubrow, Robert; Ebi, Kristie L; Eckelman, Matthew; Ekins, Paul; Escobar, Luis E; Fernandez Montoya, Lucia; Georgeson, Lucien; Graham, Hilary; Haggar, Paul; Hamilton, Ian; Hartinger, Stella; Hess, Jeremy; Kelman, Ilan; Kiesewetter, Gregor; Kjellstrom, Tord; Kniveton, Dominic; Lemke, Bruno; Liu, Yang; Lott, Melissa; Lowe, Rachel; Sewe, Maquins Odhiambo; Martinez-Urtaza, Jaime; Maslin, Mark; McAllister, Lucy; McGushin, Alice; Jankin Mikhaylov, Slava; Milner, James; Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar; Morrissey, Karyn; Murray, Kris; Munzert, Simon; Nilsson, Maria; Neville, Tara; Oreszczyn, Tadj; Owfi, Fereidoon; Pearman, Olivia; Pencheon, David; Phung, Dung; Pye, Steve; Quinn, Ruth; Rabbaniha, Mahnaz; Robinson, Elizabeth; Rocklöv, Joacim; Semenza, Jan C; Sherman, Jodi; Shumake-Guillemot, Joy; Tabatabaei, Meisam; Taylor, Jonathon; Trinanes, Joaquin; Wilkinson, Paul; Costello, Anthony; Gong, Peng; Montgomery, Hugh (November 2019). “The 2019 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: ensuring that the health of a child born today is not defined by a changing climate”. The Lancet. 394 (10211): 1836–1878. Bibcode:2019Lanc..394.1836W. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32596-6. PMC 7616843. PMID 31733928.
^ United Nations Development Programme 2020, p. 10.
^ Kuzemko, Caroline; Bradshaw, Michael; Bridge, Gavin; Goldthau, Andreas; Jewell, Jessica; Overland, Indra; Scholten, Daniel; Van de Graaf, Thijs; Westphal, Kirsten (October 2020). “Covid-19 and the politics of sustainable energy transitions”. Energy Research & Social Science. 68: 101685. Bibcode:2020ERSS…6801685K. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101685. PMC 7330551. PMID 32839704.
^ IRENA 2021, p. 5.