Sustainable Technology Of 3910

Sustainable technology of 3910 ?

It’s impossible to predict the exact nature of sustainable technology in the year 3910. However, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and potential future developments:

Possible Trends in Sustainable Technology by 3910:

Advanced Energy Sources:
- Fusion Power: If humanity manages to harness fusion energy, it could provide a clean, abundant, and sustainable power source.
- Space-Based Solar Power: Collecting solar energy in space and beaming it down to Earth could provide a continuous and inexhaustible source of power.
- Zero-Point Energy: Though still theoretical, the possibility of tapping into zero-point energy could revolutionize energy production.
Closed-Loop Systems:
- Resource Regeneration: Technologies capable of regenerating and recycling all resources, including rare earth minerals and water, could become commonplace.
- Waste Elimination: Advanced systems could completely eliminate waste by transforming it into usable energy or raw materials.
Biotechnology and Biomimicry:
- Bio-Integrated Technology: Technology seamlessly integrated with living organisms could be used for energy production, environmental monitoring, and even self-healing infrastructure.
- Biomimetic Materials: Materials designed to mimic natural processes could be used to create self-repairing buildings, biodegradable plastics, and more efficient transportation systems.
Artificial Intelligence and Automation:
- Smart Infrastructure: AI-powered systems could optimize energy use, manage resources, and predict environmental changes.
- Autonomous Systems: Self-sustaining cities and automated resource management systems could minimize human impact on the environment.
Space Colonization and Terraforming:
- Off-World Resources: Access to resources from other planets or asteroids could alleviate pressure on Earth’s resources.
- Planetary Engineering: Advanced technologies might enable the terraforming of other planets to make them habitable.

Challenges and Considerations:

Ethical Implications: As technology advances, ethical considerations regarding its use and impact on society and the environment will become even more critical.
Technological Singularity: If artificial intelligence surpasses human intelligence, it could lead to unpredictable outcomes for sustainable technology and humanity itself.
Unforeseen Discoveries: Future scientific breakthroughs could lead to sustainable technologies that we cannot even imagine today.

It’s important to remember that this is just speculation. The actual nature of sustainable technology in 3910 will depend on countless factors, including scientific advancements, societal choices, and unforeseen events. However, by considering current trends and potential future developments, we can gain a glimpse into the possibilities and challenges that lie ahead.

What is Sustainable technology of 3910 ?

Predicting the exact nature of sustainable technology in 3910 is impossible. However, based on current trends and potential future developments, we can make some educated guesses:

Possible Trends:

Advanced Energy Sources: Fusion power, space-based solar power, or even theoretical zero-point energy could provide clean, abundant, and sustainable power.
Closed-Loop Systems: Technologies capable of regenerating and recycling all resources, including rare earth minerals and water, could become commonplace. Advanced systems could completely eliminate waste by transforming it into usable energy or raw materials.
Biotechnology and Biomimicry: Technology seamlessly integrated with living organisms could be used for energy production, environmental monitoring, and even self-healing infrastructure. Materials designed to mimic natural processes could be used to create self-repairing buildings, biodegradable plastics, and more efficient transportation systems.
Artificial Intelligence and Automation: AI-powered systems could optimize energy use, manage resources, and predict environmental changes. Self-sustaining cities and automated resource management systems could minimize human impact on the environment.
Space Colonization and Terraforming: Access to resources from other planets or asteroids could alleviate pressure on Earth’s resources. Advanced technologies might enable the terraforming of other planets to make them habitable.

Challenges and Considerations:

Ethical Implications: Ethical considerations regarding the use of advanced technology and its impact on society and the environment will become even more critical.
Technological Singularity: If artificial intelligence surpasses human intelligence, it could lead to unpredictable outcomes for sustainable technology and humanity itself.
Unforeseen Discoveries: Future scientific breakthroughs could lead to sustainable technologies that we cannot even imagine today.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 3910 ?

It’s difficult to say definitively who will be the primary users or beneficiaries of sustainable technology in 3910. However, we can make some informed assumptions:

Likely Beneficiaries:

Humanity: Ultimately, sustainable technology in 3910 would be essential for the survival and well-being of humanity. It would likely provide access to clean energy, resources, and a habitable environment.
Future Generations: Sustainable technology would ensure that future generations inherit a healthy planet with abundant resources.
Ecosystems: Advanced technology could play a crucial role in restoring and preserving ecosystems, protecting biodiversity, and mitigating the effects of climate change.
Potentially, Other Civilizations: If humanity has expanded beyond Earth by 3910, sustainable technology would be crucial for establishing and maintaining off-world colonies and potentially interacting with other civilizations.

Potential Users:

Individuals: Individuals would likely benefit from and interact with sustainable technology in their daily lives, through smart homes, personal transportation, and access to resources.
Communities: Cities and communities could be managed by AI-powered systems that optimize resource use and minimize environmental impact.
Governments and Organizations: Governments and global organizations would likely play a role in regulating and implementing sustainable technologies to ensure equitable access and environmental protection.
Scientists and Engineers: Researchers and engineers would continue to develop and refine sustainable technologies, pushing the boundaries of what is possible.
Artificial Intelligence: In a future where AI may have surpassed human intelligence, AI systems could become active users and even developers of sustainable technology, managing complex systems and optimizing resource use.

It’s important to consider:

Equity: Ideally, sustainable technology in 3910 would be accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or social status.
Interconnectedness: Sustainable technology would likely be integrated into all aspects of life, from energy production and resource management to transportation and communication.
Evolution: The users and beneficiaries of sustainable technology in 3910 would likely evolve alongside the technology itself, adapting to new challenges and opportunities.

While we cannot know for sure who will be required for sustainable technology in 3910, it’s safe to say that its development and use would be crucial for the long-term survival and prosperity of humanity and the planet.

When is required Sustainable technology of 3910 ?

While it’s impossible to pinpoint an exact date for when sustainable technology will be “required” in 3910, it’s safe to say that its importance will be paramount for the long-term survival and prosperity of humanity and the planet.

Here’s why:

Resource Depletion: By 3910, if not addressed by earlier generations, the Earth’s resources may be significantly depleted. Sustainable technology would be crucial for ensuring access to essential resources like clean energy, water, and raw materials.
Environmental Degradation: Climate change and other environmental issues could worsen over time. Sustainable technology would be necessary to mitigate these effects, restore ecosystems, and create a habitable environment.
Population Growth: If the human population continues to grow, sustainable technology would be essential for providing for everyone’s needs without further straining the planet’s resources.
Space Exploration: If humanity has expanded beyond Earth by 3910, sustainable technology would be crucial for establishing and maintaining off-world colonies and ensuring their self-sufficiency.

It’s important to consider:

Evolutionary Process: The need for sustainable technology would likely evolve gradually over time, becoming increasingly critical as resources dwindle and environmental challenges mount.
Proactive vs. Reactive: Ideally, societies would proactively adopt sustainable technologies long before 3910 to prevent the most severe consequences of resource depletion and environmental degradation.
Global Cooperation: The development and implementation of sustainable technology would likely require global cooperation and a shared understanding of its importance for the future of humanity.

In essence, sustainable technology in 3910 would not just be “required” but would likely be an integral part of everyday life, ensuring the survival and well-being of humanity and the planet.

It’s crucial to remember that the choices we make today will determine the state of the world in 3910. By prioritizing sustainable technology now, we can help ensure a brighter future for generations to come.

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

Where is required Sustainable technology of 3910 ?

It’s more about “where” sustainable technology will be essential in 3910, rather than “where” it will be merely present. Here’s a breakdown:

Earth:
- Urban Centers: Cities will likely be hubs of sustainable technology, with smart infrastructure, efficient resource management, and clean energy systems.
- Rural Areas: Sustainable agriculture, renewable energy sources, and eco-friendly housing would be crucial for sustainable living in rural communities.
- Ecosystems: Protected areas and even managed ecosystems could rely on advanced technology for monitoring, restoration, and preservation.
Space:
- Off-world Colonies: If humanity has expanded beyond Earth, sustainable technology would be essential for establishing self-sufficient colonies on other planets or celestial bodies.
- Space Stations: Space stations would likely utilize sustainable technology for energy production, resource recycling, and life support systems.
- Space Exploration: Sustainable propulsion systems, resource extraction technologies, and closed-loop life support systems would be crucial for long-duration space missions.
Everywhere:
- Homes: Individual homes would likely be equipped with smart devices and systems that optimize energy use, manage resources, and promote sustainable living.
- Transportation: Sustainable transportation systems, such as electric vehicles, high-speed trains, and even advanced forms of personal air travel, could be prevalent.
- Industries: All industries would likely need to adopt sustainable practices, using clean energy, minimizing waste, and recycling resources.

Key Considerations:

Interconnectedness: Sustainable technology in 3910 would likely be interconnected across all locations, with global networks for resource management, environmental monitoring, and knowledge sharing.
Adaptability: Sustainable technology would need to be adaptable to diverse environments, from the extreme conditions of space to the varied ecosystems on Earth.
Accessibility: Ideally, sustainable technology would be accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or social status.

Ultimately, sustainable technology in 3910 would be essential for creating a thriving and equitable future for humanity and the planet, both on Earth and beyond.

How is required Sustainable technology of 3910 ?

It’s not so much about how sustainable technology will be “required” in 3910, but rather how it will likely be integrated and essential for survival and well-being. Here’s a look at how it might function:

1. Seamless Integration:

Embedded Systems: Sustainable technology would likely be deeply embedded in everyday life, from homes and transportation to industries and infrastructure. Think of it less as separate devices and more like an invisible, intelligent layer optimizing everything.
AI-Driven Management: Artificial intelligence would likely play a central role in managing complex sustainable systems, from energy grids and resource allocation to environmental monitoring and disaster response.

2. Closed-Loop Systems:

Resource Regeneration: Technologies capable of regenerating and recycling all resources, including rare earth minerals and water, could be commonplace. Waste as we know it might be a thing of the past.
Circular Economy: Industries would likely operate on a circular economy model, where resources are continuously reused and repurposed, minimizing waste and environmental impact.

3. Bio-Integrated Technology:

Living Systems: Technology seamlessly integrated with living organisms could be used for energy production (e.g., bio-solar panels), environmental monitoring, and even self-healing infrastructure.
Biomimicry: Materials and systems designed to mimic natural processes could be used to create self-repairing buildings, biodegradable plastics, and more efficient transportation systems.

4. Advanced Energy Systems:

Clean and Abundant Energy: Fusion power, space-based solar energy, or other advanced energy sources could provide clean, abundant, and sustainable power for all needs.
Localized Energy Grids: Smart grids and microgrids could distribute energy more efficiently, with localized generation and storage capabilities.

5. Global Cooperation:

Shared Knowledge: Global networks would likely facilitate the sharing of knowledge and technologies related to sustainability, fostering collaboration and innovation.
Environmental Monitoring: Advanced monitoring systems could track environmental changes on a global scale, enabling proactive responses to potential threats.

Important Considerations:

Adaptability: Sustainable technology would need to be adaptable to diverse environments, from the extreme conditions of space to the varied ecosystems on Earth.
Resilience: Sustainable systems would need to be resilient to natural disasters, climate change impacts, and other unforeseen events.
Ethical Considerations: Ethical frameworks would be essential to guide the development and use of advanced technology, ensuring that it benefits all of humanity and the planet.

In essence, sustainable technology in 3910 would likely be a highly advanced and integrated system that supports human civilization and preserves the planet’s resources and ecosystems. It would be less about specific technologies and more about a holistic approach to ensuring a sustainable future.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 3910 ?

It’s impossible to create a true “case study” of sustainable technology in 3910, as that would require predicting the future. However, we can construct a hypothetical case study based on current trends and potential advancements, illustrating how sustainable technology might function in such a distant future.

Hypothetical Case Study: The City of Aurora, 3910

Background: By 3910, many of the challenges facing humanity in the 21st century have been addressed through widespread adoption of sustainable technologies. Climate change has been mitigated, resource depletion is managed, and a global focus on ecological balance prevails. The City of Aurora, a large, densely populated urban center, exemplifies how these technologies might be integrated.

Scenario: Aurora is a self-sustaining city, powered entirely by a combination of space-based solar energy beamed down to a central receiving station and localized fusion micro-reactors. These energy sources are clean, abundant, and managed by a sophisticated AI system that optimizes distribution and minimizes waste.

Key Sustainable Technologies in Use:

Atmospheric Resource Harvesting: Aurora utilizes advanced technology to extract essential elements like carbon, nitrogen, and hydrogen directly from the atmosphere. These are then used to create synthetic materials, fuels, and even food, minimizing reliance on external resources.
Closed-Loop Waste Management: Waste in Aurora is a thing of the past. All materials are recycled and repurposed through a network of automated facilities. Organic waste is converted into biofuel and fertilizer, while inorganic materials are broken down into their base components and used to create new products.
Bio-Integrated Infrastructure: Many of Aurora’s buildings incorporate living systems. Walls are covered in bio-solar panels that generate energy and purify the air. Wastewater is treated by algae farms that produce biofuel and food. Even the city’s transportation network integrates with the natural environment, with vehicles powered by biofuels and designed to minimize their impact on ecosystems.
Personalized Sustainability Systems: Each citizen of Aurora interacts with a personalized AI assistant that tracks their resource consumption and provides recommendations for sustainable living. These assistants can also connect individuals with local resource-sharing networks and facilitate participation in community sustainability initiatives.
Precision Agriculture: Food for Aurora’s citizens is grown in vertical farms and hydroponic gardens located within the city. These facilities use minimal land and water, and are managed by AI systems that optimize crop yields and minimize environmental impact.

Outcomes:

Environmental Harmony: Aurora exists in balance with its surrounding environment. Pollution is virtually non-existent, and the city’s impact on local ecosystems is minimal.
Resource Abundance: Aurora has access to all the resources it needs to thrive, thanks to its advanced resource harvesting and recycling technologies.
High Quality of Life: Citizens of Aurora enjoy a high quality of life, with access to clean energy, healthy food, and a vibrant urban environment.
Resilience: Aurora is resilient to environmental changes and natural disasters, thanks to its robust infrastructure and advanced monitoring systems.

Conclusion:

This hypothetical case study illustrates how sustainable technology in 3910 could be seamlessly integrated into urban life, creating a thriving and environmentally responsible society. While the specific technologies described are speculative, they are based on current trends and potential future developments, providing a glimpse into the possibilities and challenges of a sustainable future.

COURTESY : Voith Group

White paper on Sustainable technology of 3910 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 3910 – A Speculative Exploration

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 3910. Given the vast timescale, predictions are inherently speculative. However, by extrapolating current trends, considering potential scientific breakthroughs, and acknowledging the imperative for long-term human survival, we can construct a plausible, though imaginative, vision of how technology might serve sustainability in such a distant future. This exploration focuses on key areas like energy, resource management, biotechnology, and the role of artificial intelligence.

1. Introduction:

The challenges facing humanity in the 21st century—climate change, resource depletion, pollution—necessitate a radical shift towards sustainable practices. By 3910, it is reasonable to assume that these challenges will have been addressed, or humanity will have faced dire consequences. This paper posits that sustainable technology will be not just a desirable option, but a fundamental requirement for human civilization to thrive.

2. Energy:

Fusion Power Dominance: Controlled nuclear fusion, if achieved, could provide clean, abundant, and virtually inexhaustible energy. By 3910, fusion reactors could be commonplace, powering cities, industries, and even spacecraft.
Space-Based Solar Energy: Harnessing solar energy in space and beaming it down to Earth could provide a continuous and reliable source of power, unaffected by weather patterns or day-night cycles.
Advanced Energy Storage: Highly efficient and compact energy storage solutions will be crucial for balancing energy supply and demand, particularly for intermittent renewable sources.
Localized Microgrids: Smart grids and microgrids will likely be prevalent, allowing for localized energy generation and distribution, increasing resilience and reducing transmission losses.

3. Resource Management:

Closed-Loop Resource Cycles: The concept of “waste” as we know it may be obsolete. Advanced recycling and resource regeneration technologies will enable the creation of closed-loop systems where materials are continuously reused and repurposed.
Atmospheric Resource Harvesting: Extracting essential elements like carbon, nitrogen, and hydrogen directly from the atmosphere could provide raw materials for manufacturing, agriculture, and even food production.
Precision Resource Management: AI-powered systems will likely manage resource allocation at a global scale, optimizing consumption and minimizing waste.

4. Biotechnology and Biomimicry:

Bio-Integrated Technology: Integrating technology with living systems could unlock new possibilities for energy production (e.g., bio-solar panels), environmental monitoring, and even self-healing infrastructure.
Biomimetic Materials: Materials designed to mimic natural processes could revolutionize construction, manufacturing, and transportation, leading to more sustainable and resilient infrastructure.
Synthetic Biology: Advances in synthetic biology could enable the creation of microorganisms that can produce biofuels, break down pollutants, or even synthesize new materials.

5. Artificial Intelligence and Automation:

Smart Infrastructure: AI-powered systems will likely manage cities and infrastructure, optimizing energy use, managing resources, and predicting environmental changes.
Autonomous Systems: Self-sustaining cities and automated resource management systems could minimize human impact on the environment.
Global Environmental Monitoring: AI-driven monitoring systems could track environmental changes on a global scale, providing early warnings of potential threats and enabling proactive responses.

6. Space Colonization and Terraforming:

Off-World Resources: Access to resources from other planets or asteroids could alleviate pressure on Earth’s resources and enable further expansion of human civilization.
Planetary Engineering: Advanced technologies might enable the terraforming of other planets, making them habitable for humans and other life forms.

7. Ethical Considerations:

As technology advances, ethical considerations become even more critical. By 3910, robust ethical frameworks will be essential to guide the development and use of sustainable technology, ensuring that it benefits all of humanity and the planet.

8. Conclusion:

While predicting the future is an exercise in imagination, this white paper offers a plausible vision of how sustainable technology might function in 3910. The key takeaway is that sustainable technology will be essential for the long-term survival and prosperity of humanity. By investing in research and development today, we can pave the way for a brighter and more sustainable future for generations to come.

Disclaimer: This white paper is a speculative exploration and does not represent a definitive prediction of the future. The technologies and concepts described are based on current trends and potential future developments, but the actual nature of sustainable technology in 3910 may differ significantly.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 3910 ?

It’s fascinating to imagine the industrial applications of sustainable technology in 3910! Here are some possibilities, keeping in mind this is speculative territory:

1. Advanced Manufacturing:

Atmospheric Resource Utilization: Factories could directly extract raw materials like carbon, nitrogen, and metals from the atmosphere, reducing reliance on mining and transportation.
Closed-Loop Production: Manufacturing processes might operate on closed-loop systems, where all byproducts and waste are recycled and reused within the factory itself.
Personalized Production: Advanced 3D printing and nanotechnology could enable on-demand manufacturing of highly customized products with minimal waste.

2. Energy Production and Distribution:

Fusion-Powered Industries: Industries requiring high energy inputs, like steel production or chemical manufacturing, could be powered by clean and abundant fusion energy.
Localized Energy Grids: Factories could have their own localized energy grids, powered by a combination of renewable sources and advanced storage technologies.

3. Resource Management and Recycling:

Automated Recycling Facilities: Highly automated facilities could efficiently sort and process all types of waste, extracting valuable materials and converting unusable byproducts into energy.
Resource Regeneration: Advanced technologies might enable the regeneration of rare earth minerals and other scarce resources, ensuring a sustainable supply for industries.

4. Biotechnology and Biomimicry:

Bio-Factories: Industries could utilize bio-factories, where microorganisms are used to produce biofuels, bioplastics, and other valuable materials.
Biomimetic Materials: Construction and manufacturing industries could use materials designed to mimic natural processes, leading to self-healing structures, biodegradable plastics, and more durable and sustainable products.

5. Environmental Remediation:

Advanced Pollution Control: Industries could employ highly efficient technologies to capture and neutralize pollutants, preventing them from entering the environment.
Ecosystem Restoration: Advanced technologies could be used to restore damaged ecosystems, reforest degraded areas, and even reverse the effects of climate change.

6. Space-Based Industries:

Off-world Resource Extraction: If humanity has expanded into space, industries could be established on other planets or asteroids to extract resources and manufacture products, reducing the burden on Earth’s resources.
Space-Based Manufacturing: Factories in space could utilize zero-gravity conditions and abundant solar energy to produce materials and products that are difficult or impossible to manufacture on Earth.

Key Considerations:

Automation: Many industrial processes in 3910 would likely be highly automated, with AI-powered systems managing production, optimizing resource use, and ensuring safety.
Sustainability by Design: Sustainability would be integrated into every stage of industrial processes, from the design of products to the management of waste.
Global Collaboration: Global networks would likely facilitate the sharing of knowledge and technologies related to sustainable industry, fostering innovation and collaboration.

It’s important to remember that these are just potential scenarios. The actual industrial applications of sustainable technology in 3910 will depend on countless factors, including scientific breakthroughs, economic conditions, and societal choices. However, by considering current trends and potential future developments, we can gain a glimpse into the possibilities and challenges that lie ahead.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 3910 ?

It’s exciting to think about the research and development (R&D) that might lead to the sustainable technologies of 3910! While we can’t know for sure, here are some potential areas of focus, building on current trends and imagining future breakthroughs:

1. Advanced Energy Technologies:

Fusion Energy: Continued research into controlled nuclear fusion is crucial. This includes developing more efficient reactor designs, improving plasma confinement, and finding sustainable fuel sources.
Space-Based Solar Power: R&D would focus on developing efficient methods for collecting solar energy in space, transmitting it to Earth, and integrating it with existing power grids.
Zero-Point Energy: Though still theoretical, research into tapping into zero-point energy could revolutionize energy production. This would involve exploring quantum physics and developing technologies to harness this energy source.
Advanced Energy Storage: R&D would focus on developing highly efficient and compact energy storage solutions, such as advanced batteries, supercapacitors, and even new forms of energy storage based on quantum phenomena.

2. Resource Management and Recycling:

Resource Regeneration: Research into advanced materials science and nanotechnology could lead to technologies capable of regenerating rare earth minerals and other scarce resources from waste or even from readily available materials.
Atmospheric Resource Harvesting: Developing efficient methods for extracting essential elements like carbon, nitrogen, and metals directly from the atmosphere would be a key area of research.
Advanced Recycling Technologies: R&D would focus on developing highly automated and efficient recycling systems that can break down complex materials into their base components and repurpose them for new uses.

3. Biotechnology and Biomimicry:

Bio-Integrated Technology: Research into bioengineering and synthetic biology could lead to the development of technologies that seamlessly integrate with living organisms for energy production, environmental monitoring, and even self-healing infrastructure.
Biomimetic Materials: Scientists could study natural materials and processes to design new materials with unique properties, such as self-repairing capabilities, biodegradability, and extreme strength.
Synthetic Biology: R&D in synthetic biology could focus on creating microorganisms that can produce biofuels, break down pollutants, or even synthesize new materials.

4. Artificial Intelligence and Automation:

AI for Sustainability: Research would focus on developing AI systems that can manage complex sustainable systems, such as energy grids, resource allocation, and environmental monitoring.
Autonomous Systems: R&D would explore the development of self-sustaining cities and automated resource management systems that can minimize human impact on the environment.
Global Environmental Monitoring: Scientists could develop advanced monitoring systems that can track environmental changes on a global scale, providing early warnings of potential threats and enabling proactive responses.

5. Space Colonization and Terraforming:

Off-world Resource Extraction: R&D would focus on developing technologies for extracting resources from other planets or asteroids, including mining robots, automated processing facilities, and efficient transportation systems.
Planetary Engineering: Scientists could explore the possibility of terraforming other planets, developing technologies to modify their atmospheres, climates, and environments to make them habitable for humans.

Key Considerations:

Interdisciplinary Collaboration: R&D in sustainable technology would require collaboration across multiple disciplines, including physics, chemistry, biology, engineering, and computer science.
Ethical Considerations: Ethical frameworks would be essential to guide the development and use of advanced technology, ensuring that it benefits all of humanity and the planet.
Long-Term Vision: R&D in sustainable technology would require a long-term vision, with a focus on developing solutions that can address the challenges of future generations.

It’s important to remember that this is just a glimpse into the potential areas of R&D for sustainable technology in 3910. The actual focus of research will depend on countless factors, including scientific breakthroughs, societal priorities, and unforeseen events. However, by investing in these areas today, we can help ensure a brighter and more sustainable future for generations to come.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.