
Sustainable technology of 3830 ?
It seems like you might be interested in the sales figures for electric two-wheelers from a company called Wardwizard Innovations & Mobility Limited. They sell electric vehicles under the brands “Joy e-bike” and “Joy e-rik”.
In January 2025, they sold 3,830 electric two-wheelers, which was an increase of 18.76% compared to January 2024. This number includes both their high-speed and low-speed models.
If you’d like to know more about their specific models or their plans for sustainable technology, I can try to find more information for you. Just let me know what you’re interested in!
What is Sustainable technology of 3830 ?
Unfortunately, with just the number “3830”, it’s impossible to tell you what specific sustainable technology it refers to. Numbers by themselves don’t usually have inherent meanings related to technology.
However, here are some possibilities and how we could find out more:
- Model Number: It could be a model number for a specific piece of sustainable technology. To find out what it is, we would need more context. For example, is it related to solar panels, electric vehicles, or something else entirely? If you have any more information about the context, I can try searching for it.
- Research Paper or Project: “3830” might be a reference number for a research paper, project, or patent related to sustainable technology. If you can provide any keywords or the area of sustainable technology it might be related to, I can help you search for it.
- Specific Company or Organization: Some companies or organizations might use numbers in their internal systems to refer to specific technologies or initiatives. If you know which company or organization it might be related to, we could try checking their website or contacting them for more information.
To help me understand what “3830” refers to, please provide more context. For example:
- What type of sustainable technology are you interested in? (e.g., renewable energy, waste management, sustainable agriculture)
- Where did you encounter this number? (e.g., a website, a document, a conversation)
- Do you have any other information about it? (e.g., a name, a company, a location)
The more information you can give me, the better chance I have of helping you understand what “3830” refers to in the context of sustainable technology.
Who is required Sustainable technology of 3830 ?
Unfortunately, without knowing what “Sustainable technology of 3830” refers to, it’s impossible to say who specifically requires it.
However, I can talk in general terms about who might need or benefit from sustainable technologies, and how that might relate to a specific technology if we knew what it was.
In general, the need for sustainable technology is driven by several factors:
- Environmental Concerns: Issues like climate change, pollution, and resource depletion make sustainable technologies necessary for preserving the planet.
- Economic Factors: Sustainable technologies can lead to cost savings through energy efficiency, waste reduction, and resource optimization.
- Social Responsibility: Many organizations and individuals feel a responsibility to adopt sustainable practices for the well-being of future generations.
Depending on what “Sustainable technology of 3830” is, different groups might be more likely to require it:
- Industries: Certain industries, like manufacturing or energy, might need specific sustainable technologies to reduce their environmental impact or comply with regulations.
- Governments: Governments might require the use of sustainable technologies in public projects or infrastructure to meet environmental goals.
- Individuals: Individuals might choose to adopt sustainable technologies in their homes or daily lives to reduce their carbon footprint.
If we knew what “Sustainable technology of 3830” refers to, we could be more specific about who might require it. For example:
- If it’s a type of renewable energy technology, industries or governments might be required to use it to meet renewable energy targets.
- If it’s a type of waste management technology, businesses or municipalities might be required to use it to reduce waste and pollution.
To help me understand who might require “Sustainable technology of 3830”, please provide more context about what it is. The more information you can give me, the better chance I have of helping you understand its relevance and who might need it.
When is required Sustainable technology of 3830 ?
As before, without knowing what “Sustainable technology of 3830” is, it’s impossible to pinpoint when it’s required. However, I can discuss the general factors that make sustainable technologies necessary and how those might relate to a specific technology if we knew what it was.
The when of needing sustainable technology is driven by a combination of factors, often overlapping:
- Urgency of the Problem: The more pressing an environmental or resource issue is, the sooner the related sustainable technology is needed. For instance, if a region is facing severe water shortages, water conservation technologies are needed now. If climate change impacts are becoming severe, the need for renewable energy and carbon capture technologies becomes more urgent.
- Regulatory Timelines: Governments often set deadlines for adopting certain sustainable technologies through regulations. These timelines can be based on environmental targets, public health concerns, or international agreements. For example, a city might mandate all new buildings to meet certain energy efficiency standards by a specific year.
- Economic Incentives: Sometimes, the “when” is driven by economics. As sustainable technologies become more cost-effective, their adoption becomes more attractive. For example, as solar panel prices have fallen, their adoption has increased.
- Technological Development: The “when” can also depend on the maturity of the technology. Some sustainable technologies are still under development, and their widespread adoption depends on further research and innovation. Once they become commercially viable, the “when” shifts from research to implementation.
- Social Awareness and Demand: Growing public awareness of environmental issues can create demand for sustainable products and services, driving their adoption. This can influence when businesses choose to offer sustainable options.
If we knew what “Sustainable technology of 3830” refers to, we could be more specific about when it might be required. For example:
- If it’s a technology related to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, its “when” might be tied to national or international climate targets.
- If it’s a technology for cleaning up pollution, its “when” might be triggered by a specific environmental disaster or a newly discovered health risk.
To understand the “when” of “Sustainable technology of 3830”, please provide more context about what it is. The more information you can give me, the better chance I have of helping you understand its relevance and the factors that influence its adoption timeline.
COURTESY : Bernard Marr
Where is required Sustainable technology of 3830 ?
You’re right to ask “where”! It’s a crucial part of understanding the role of any technology, especially when we’re talking about sustainability. Since we still don’t know exactly what “Sustainable technology of 3830” is, I can give you some general ideas of where sustainable technologies are needed, and how that might apply if we knew more.
Sustainable technologies are needed in a wide range of places, basically anywhere human activity impacts the environment. Here are some key areas:
- Urban Centers: Cities are hubs of consumption and waste generation. Sustainable technologies are needed for energy-efficient buildings, public transportation, waste management, and urban agriculture.
- Rural Areas: Sustainable technologies are crucial for agriculture (precision farming, water conservation), renewable energy generation (solar, wind), and resource management.
- Industrial Sites: Factories and manufacturing plants need sustainable technologies to reduce emissions, minimize waste, and improve resource efficiency.
- Transportation: Sustainable technologies are essential for developing electric vehicles, improving fuel efficiency, and creating sustainable transportation infrastructure.
- Homes and Buildings: Sustainable technologies can be implemented in homes and buildings to reduce energy consumption, conserve water, and use sustainable materials.
If we knew what “Sustainable technology of 3830” is, we could be more specific about where it might be required. For example:
- If it’s a type of renewable energy technology, it might be required in areas with high solar or wind potential, or in regions aiming to reduce their reliance on fossil fuels.
- If it’s a technology for water purification, it might be required in areas with limited access to clean water or in regions facing water scarcity.
- If it’s a technology for waste management, it might be required in urban areas with high population density or in industrial settings that generate significant amounts of waste.
To help me understand where “Sustainable technology of 3830” might be required, please provide more context about what it is. The more information you can give me, the better chance I have of helping you understand its relevance and where it might be applied.
How is required Sustainable technology of 3830 ?
You’re asking a very important question: how is sustainable technology required? Again, without knowing what “Sustainable technology of 3830” is, I can only give general answers. But these general answers are key to understanding the broader context.
Sustainable technologies are “required” in a variety of ways, often through a combination of these mechanisms:
- Regulations and Policies: Governments at various levels (local, regional, national, international) can mandate the use of certain sustainable technologies through laws, regulations, and policies. Examples include emissions standards for vehicles, building codes that require energy efficiency, and mandates for renewable energy generation.
- Incentives and Subsidies: Governments can also encourage the adoption of sustainable technologies by offering financial incentives, such as tax breaks, subsidies, or grants. This can make sustainable options more economically attractive.
- Market Forces: Consumer demand for sustainable products and services can drive businesses to adopt sustainable technologies. As consumers become more aware of environmental issues, they may choose to buy products from companies that are committed to sustainability.
- Technological Advancements: As research and development progress, sustainable technologies become more efficient, cost-effective, and readily available. This can make them more competitive with traditional technologies and lead to their wider adoption.
- International Agreements and Standards: Global agreements on issues like climate change can create pressure for countries to adopt sustainable technologies to meet their commitments. International standards can also help ensure the quality and interoperability of sustainable technologies.
- Corporate Social Responsibility: Many companies are adopting sustainable practices as part of their commitment to corporate social responsibility. This can involve setting internal targets for reducing emissions, using renewable energy, and minimizing waste.
If we knew what “Sustainable technology of 3830” is, we could be more specific about how it might be required. For example:
- If it’s a technology for reducing pollution from industrial processes, it might be required through environmental regulations.
- If it’s a technology for generating renewable energy, it might be encouraged through government incentives or mandates.
- If it’s a technology for improving energy efficiency in buildings, it might be required through building codes.
To understand how “Sustainable technology of 3830” might be required, please provide more context about what it is. The more information you can give me, the better chance I have of helping you understand its relevance and the mechanisms that might drive its adoption.
Case study is Sustainable technology of 3830 ?
Let’s try a different approach. Since we’re stuck on “3830,” which likely is a specific thing, but we don’t know what, let’s explore some actual case studies of sustainable technologies. This might help us understand the kind of thing “3830” could be and give you some real-world examples.
Here are a few diverse case studies of sustainable technologies:
1. The Tesla Gigafactory (Nevada, USA): This massive factory produces lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles and energy storage. It’s a case study in sustainable manufacturing, focusing on:
- Renewable Energy: The factory aims to be powered entirely by renewable energy, primarily solar.
- Closed-Loop Systems: Tesla is working to create closed-loop systems for recycling battery materials, reducing waste and resource depletion.
- Scale and Efficiency: The Gigafactory’s scale allows for economies of scale, making electric vehicles and energy storage more affordable.
2. The City of Copenhagen’s District Heating System (Denmark): Copenhagen uses a district heating system that relies heavily on renewable energy sources, like biomass and geothermal. This case study shows:
- Reduced Fossil Fuel Dependence: The system significantly reduces the city’s reliance on fossil fuels for heating.
- Increased Energy Efficiency: District heating is often more energy-efficient than individual heating systems.
- Integration of Renewables: The system demonstrates how various renewable energy sources can be integrated into a large-scale energy system.
3. Vertical Farming (Various Locations): Vertical farms grow crops in stacked layers, often indoors, using controlled environments. This case study highlights:
- Reduced Land Use: Vertical farms can produce large amounts of food on a small footprint of land.
- Water Conservation: They often use less water than traditional agriculture.
- Reduced Transportation Costs: Vertical farms can be located closer to urban centers, reducing transportation costs and emissions.
4. Solar-Powered Water Purification (Various Locations): Many communities around the world lack access to clean drinking water. Solar-powered water purification systems offer a sustainable solution:
- Off-Grid Capability: These systems can operate independently of the electrical grid, making them suitable for remote areas.
- Reduced Reliance on Fossil Fuels: They use solar energy, eliminating the need for fossil fuels to power water purification.
- Improved Public Health: Access to clean water is essential for public health.
5. Sustainable Forestry Practices (Various Locations): Sustainable forestry involves managing forests to ensure their long-term health and productivity. This includes:
- Selective Logging: Harvesting trees in a way that minimizes damage to the ecosystem.
- Reforestation: Planting new trees to replace those that are harvested.
- Protecting Biodiversity: Maintaining the diversity of plant and animal life in the forest.
These are just a few examples. There are countless other case studies of sustainable technologies in areas like renewable energy, waste management, transportation, agriculture, and more.
If you can tell me anything more about the context of “3830,” even a tiny clue, we might be able to narrow down the possibilities. Perhaps it relates to one of these areas, or something entirely different.
COURTESY : Tech Evaluate
White paper on Sustainable technology of 3830 ?
Unfortunately, I can’t provide you with a specific white paper on “Sustainable technology of 3830” because, as we’ve discussed, we don’t know what “3830” refers to. It could be a model number, a code, or something else entirely.
However, I can offer some resources and suggestions that might be helpful in your search for information on sustainable technology:
1. General White Papers on Sustainable Technology:
- EPA White Paper on Sustainability: This white paper provides a good overview of the history and trends in green building, which is a major area of sustainable technology. You can find it here: https://archive.epa.gov/greenbuilding/web/pdf/bdcwhitepaperr2.pdf
- AIIA White Paper on Tech and Sustainability: This white paper focuses on the role of technology in achieving sustainability goals, with a focus on reducing carbon footprint and promoting a circular economy. You can find it here: https://aiia.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/AIIA-Tech-and-Sustainability-White-Paper-2023.pdf
- IGC White Paper on Sustainable Growth: This white paper discusses the challenges and opportunities for sustainable development, with a focus on innovation and economic growth. You can find it here: https://www.theigc.org/sites/default/files/2023-09/IGC%20White%20Paper%20on%20Sustainable%20Growth.pdf
2. White Papers by Specific Organizations:
Many organizations involved in sustainable technology publish white papers on their websites. You can try searching the websites of organizations like:
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
- Department of Energy (DOE)
- National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)
- World Wildlife Fund (WWF)
- Greenpeace
3. Search Engines and Databases:
You can use search engines like Google Scholar or databases like JSTOR to search for academic papers and white papers on specific topics related to sustainable technology.
4. If you have any clues about “3830”:
If you can recall any context where you encountered “3830,” it might help narrow down your search. For example:
- Industry: Is it related to a specific industry like energy, transportation, or agriculture?
- Company: Did you see it in relation to a particular company or organization?
- Topic: Was it associated with a specific topic within sustainable technology, like renewable energy, waste management, or green building?
Any additional information you can provide could help me guide you to relevant resources.
Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 3830 ?
While we still don’t know what “Sustainable technology of 3830” specifically is, I can give you some examples of industrial applications of sustainable technologies in general. This might spark some ideas about what “3830” could be, or at least give you some relevant information.
Here are some key areas where sustainable technologies are being applied in various industries:
1. Manufacturing:
- Energy Efficiency: Industries are adopting energy-efficient equipment, processes, and building designs to reduce energy consumption and costs. This includes things like LED lighting, efficient motors, and heat recovery systems.
- Waste Reduction: Sustainable manufacturing practices aim to minimize waste generation through process optimization, material reuse, and recycling. This can involve closed-loop systems, where waste from one process is used as input for another.
- Sustainable Materials: Industries are increasingly using sustainable materials, such as recycled materials, bio-based materials, and materials with a lower environmental impact.
- Pollution Control: Sustainable technologies are used to control and reduce pollution from industrial processes, such as air and water filtration systems, and carbon capture and storage technologies.
2. Energy:
- Renewable Energy: Industries are shifting towards renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and geothermal to reduce their reliance on fossil fuels and lower their carbon footprint.
- Smart Grids: Smart grid technologies are used to optimize energy distribution and consumption, improving efficiency and reducing waste.
- Energy Storage: Energy storage systems, such as batteries and pumped hydro, are used to store renewable energy and ensure a reliable supply.
3. Transportation:
- Electric Vehicles: Industries are adopting electric vehicles for their fleets and encouraging employees to use them, reducing emissions and fuel costs.
- Sustainable Logistics: Sustainable logistics practices aim to minimize the environmental impact of transportation and supply chain operations, such as optimizing routes, using fuel-efficient vehicles, and reducing packaging waste.
4. Agriculture:
- Precision Farming: Precision farming technologies use data and sensors to optimize resource use in agriculture, such as water, fertilizer, and pesticides, reducing environmental impact and improving yields.
- Sustainable Irrigation: Sustainable irrigation practices aim to conserve water and reduce water waste, such as drip irrigation and rainwater harvesting.
5. Construction:
- Green Buildings: Green building practices focus on designing and constructing buildings that are energy-efficient, resource-efficient, and have a lower environmental impact. This includes using sustainable materials, incorporating renewable energy systems, and optimizing building design for natural light and ventilation.
6. Information Technology:
- Green IT: Green IT initiatives aim to reduce the environmental impact of IT operations, such as using energy-efficient hardware, optimizing data center energy consumption, and promoting e-waste recycling.
These are just a few examples of how sustainable technologies are being applied in various industries. The specific applications will vary depending on the industry and its specific needs and challenges.
If you can provide any more information about the context of “Sustainable technology of 3830,” such as the industry it might be related to or any other keywords associated with it, I might be able to give you more specific examples of its industrial applications.
Research and development of Sustainable technology of 3830 ?
You’re asking about the cutting edge! Research and development (R&D) is absolutely crucial for sustainable technology. It’s how we move beyond current limitations and create the solutions we need for a more sustainable future.
Since we still don’t have a clue what “Sustainable technology of 3830” is, let’s explore some key areas of R&D in sustainable technology. This will give you a sense of the kind of innovation that’s happening and might even help you figure out what “3830” could be related to.
Here are some exciting areas of R&D in sustainable technology:
1. Advanced Materials:
- Nanomaterials: Researchers are developing nanomaterials with unique properties that can be used in various applications, such as solar cells, energy storage, and water purification.
- Bioplastics: Bioplastics made from renewable resources are being developed to replace traditional plastics derived from fossil fuels.
- Sustainable Composites: Composites made from recycled or bio-based materials are being researched for use in construction, transportation, and other industries.
2. Renewable Energy:
- Next-Generation Solar Cells: Scientists are working on improving the efficiency and reducing the cost of solar cells, including perovskite solar cells and organic solar cells.
- Advanced Wind Turbines: R&D is focused on developing larger and more efficient wind turbines, including offshore wind turbines.
- Energy Storage: Research is underway on developing more efficient and cost-effective energy storage solutions, such as advanced batteries, pumped hydro storage, and thermal energy storage.
3. Energy Efficiency:
- Smart Buildings: R&D is focused on developing smart building technologies that can optimize energy use, such as advanced sensors, controls, and building management systems.
- Efficient Appliances: Researchers are working on improving the energy efficiency of appliances, such as refrigerators, washing machines, and air conditioners.
- Waste Heat Recovery: Technologies are being developed to capture and reuse waste heat from industrial processes and other sources.
4. Sustainable Agriculture:
- Precision Agriculture: R&D is focused on developing precision agriculture technologies that can optimize resource use in farming, such as sensors, drones, and data analytics.
- Vertical Farming: Researchers are exploring vertical farming techniques to grow crops in stacked layers, reducing land use and water consumption.
- Sustainable Pest Control: R&D is underway on developing sustainable pest control methods that reduce reliance on harmful chemicals.
5. Water Management:
- Water Purification: Scientists are working on developing more efficient and cost-effective water purification technologies, such as advanced filtration systems and desalination techniques.
- Water Conservation: R&D is focused on developing water conservation technologies for agriculture, industry, and homes.
- Wastewater Treatment: Researchers are exploring advanced wastewater treatment methods to remove pollutants and reuse water.
6. Circular Economy:
- Recycling Technologies: R&D is underway on developing more efficient and cost-effective recycling technologies for various materials, such as plastics, metals, and electronics.
- Product Design for Disassembly: Researchers are exploring how to design products for easy disassembly and reuse of components.
- Industrial Symbiosis: R&D is focused on developing industrial symbiosis networks, where waste from one industry is used as a resource for another.
These are just a few examples of the many exciting areas of R&D in sustainable technology. The field is constantly evolving, with new discoveries and innovations happening all the time.
If you can remember any other details about “Sustainable technology of 3830,” such as where you encountered it or any keywords associated with it, it might help me understand what it refers to and provide you with more relevant information about its research and development.
COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM
References
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
- ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
- ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
- ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
- ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
- ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
- ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
- ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
- ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
- ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
- ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
- ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
- ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
- ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
- ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
- ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
- ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
- ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
- ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
- ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
- ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
- ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
- ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
- ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
- ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
- ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
- ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
- ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
- ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
- ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
- ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
- ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
- ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
- ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
- ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
- ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
- ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
- ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
- ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
- ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
- ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
- ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
- ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
- ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
- ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
- ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
- ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
- ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
- ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
- ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
- ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
- ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
- ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
- ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
- ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
- ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
- ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
- ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
- ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
- ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
- ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
- ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
- ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
- ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
- ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
- ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
- ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
- ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
- ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
- ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
- ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
- ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
- ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
- ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
- ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
- ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
- ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
- ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
- ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
- ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
- ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
- ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
- ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
- ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
- ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
- ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.
#fashionblogger #art #bloggerlife #photooftheday #life #beauty #influencer #k #instadaily #instablog #makeup #foodblogger#love #instagram #instagood #photography #lifestyle #travel #blogging #blogpost #bloggerstyle #style #follow #like #food #bloggers #music