Sustainable Technology of 3550

79 / 100

Sustainable Technology of 3550 ?

While the year 3550 is far in the future, we can speculate on the types of sustainable technologies that might exist based on current trends and advancements. Here are some possibilities:

1. Advanced Energy Solutions:

Fusion Power: If nuclear fusion becomes a viable energy source, it could provide clean and abundant energy.
Space-Based Solar Power: Satellites could collect solar energy and beam it back to Earth, providing a continuous source of renewable energy.
Advanced Energy Storage: Highly efficient batteries or other storage solutions could enable better use of intermittent renewable energy sources like solar and wind.

2. Closed-Loop Resource Systems:

Circular Economy: Advanced recycling and resource recovery technologies could eliminate waste and create a truly circular economy.
Atmospheric Carbon Capture: Technologies that can efficiently remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere could help mitigate climate change.
Sustainable Agriculture: Vertical farms, hydroponics, and other advanced agricultural techniques could produce food with minimal environmental impact.

3. Smart Infrastructure:

Smart Grids: Intelligent power grids could optimize energy distribution and reduce waste.
Sustainable Transportation: Electric vehicles, high-speed trains, and other forms of sustainable transportation could dominate, powered by renewable energy sources.
Eco-Cities: Urban areas could be designed to minimize environmental impact, with green spaces, efficient public transportation, and smart building technologies.

4. Biotechnology and Materials Science:

Bioplastics: Biodegradable plastics made from renewable resources could replace traditional plastics.
Advanced Materials: New materials with unique properties could be developed for use in construction, manufacturing, and other industries, reducing the need for scarce resources.
Bioremediation: Microorganisms could be used to clean up pollution and restore damaged ecosystems.

5. Artificial Intelligence and Automation:

AI-Driven Optimization: AI could be used to optimize energy use, resource allocation, and other processes to minimize environmental impact.
Automated Systems: Robots and other automated systems could perform tasks in a sustainable way, such as recycling, waste management, and environmental monitoring.

Important Considerations:

Technological Advancement: It’s difficult to predict exactly what technologies will exist in 3550, as unforeseen breakthroughs could occur.
Social and Economic Factors: The adoption of sustainable technologies will depend on social and economic factors, such as government policies, consumer behavior, and the cost of these technologies.
Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change will require international cooperation and the sharing of sustainable technologies.

While it’s impossible to know for sure what sustainable technologies will exist in 3550, it’s clear that innovation and a focus on sustainability will be crucial for creating a healthy planet for future generations.

What is Sustainable Technology of 3550 ?

Predicting the exact nature of sustainable technology in 3550 is a fun thought experiment! It’s like trying to imagine what everyday life will be like a thousand years from now. However, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and how technology might evolve:

1. Energy:

Fusion Power Dominance: If we crack the code to practical nuclear fusion, it could become the primary energy source. Imagine power plants that mimic the sun, providing clean and almost limitless energy.
Space-Based Solar: We might have massive solar arrays in space, beaming energy down to Earth. This would provide a constant source of renewable energy, unaffected by weather or day/night cycles.
Energy Storage Revolution: Super-efficient energy storage solutions could make renewable energy sources like solar and wind even more reliable. Think of batteries that can power entire cities for weeks or even months.

2. Resources:

Circular Economy Mastery: We might have perfected the art of the circular economy, where everything is recycled and reused endlessly. Waste could become a thing of the past, with resources flowing in a closed loop.
Atmospheric Carbon Capture: Machines could be able to efficiently suck CO2 out of the atmosphere, helping to reverse climate change and provide raw materials for manufacturing.
Sustainable Materials: We might have discovered new materials that are incredibly strong, lightweight, and biodegradable. Imagine buildings made from materials grown in labs, or plastics that decompose naturally in days.

3. Environment:

Ecosystem Restoration: We might have developed advanced techniques to heal damaged ecosystems, like coral reefs or rainforests. Maybe we can even reverse some of the environmental damage we’ve caused.
Pollution Elimination: Technologies could exist to remove pollutants from water and air, making our environment cleaner and healthier.
Climate Control: While it sounds like science fiction, we might even have ways to influence the climate on a local or even global scale, to prevent extreme weather events.

4. Daily Life:

Smart Everything: Our homes, transportation, and even our clothes could be integrated with technology to optimize energy use and minimize waste.
Personalized Sustainability: We might have AI assistants that help us make sustainable choices in our daily lives, from the food we eat to the products we buy.
Space Colonization: Perhaps by 3550, we’ll have established thriving colonies on other planets, powered by sustainable technologies and living in harmony with their new environments.

Important Note: It’s crucial to remember that technology alone won’t solve all our problems. We’ll also need to make significant social and political changes to ensure a sustainable future. But it’s exciting to imagine the possibilities!

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3550 ?

It’s interesting to think about who would be driving the need for sustainable technology in 3550! Here are some key players:

Future Generations: Ultimately, the primary beneficiaries of sustainable technology in 3550 would be the people living then. They would rely on these technologies for clean energy, resources, and a healthy environment.
Scientists and Engineers: Researchers and innovators would be crucial in developing and improving sustainable technologies. They would need to push the boundaries of science and engineering to create solutions for the challenges of the future.
Governments and Policymakers: Governments would play a vital role in setting policies and regulations that encourage the development and adoption of sustainable technologies. They would also need to invest in research and infrastructure to support these technologies.
Businesses and Industries: Companies would need to embrace sustainable practices and invest in sustainable technologies to reduce their environmental impact. They would also need to develop new sustainable products and services to meet the needs of future generations.
Individuals and Consumers: Everyday people would have a role to play in adopting sustainable technologies and making sustainable choices in their daily lives. This could include using public transportation, conserving energy, and supporting businesses that are committed to sustainability.
Global Organizations: International organizations would be essential in fostering collaboration and knowledge sharing to address global challenges like climate change and resource depletion. They would also need to promote sustainable development and ensure that sustainable technologies are accessible to everyone.

It’s important to remember that the need for sustainable technology in 3550 would be driven by a combination of factors, including:

Environmental Challenges: Climate change, resource depletion, pollution, and other environmental problems would necessitate the development of sustainable solutions.
Population Growth: A growing global population would increase the demand for resources and energy, making sustainability even more critical.
Technological Advancements: Continued technological innovation would be essential for developing new and improved sustainable technologies.
Social and Economic Factors: Social awareness of environmental issues and economic incentives would play a role in driving the adoption of sustainable technologies.

In essence, the need for sustainable technology in 3550 would be a collective responsibility, requiring the efforts of individuals, organizations, and governments around the world.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3550 ?

It’s a fascinating question to consider when sustainable technology will be truly required by 3550! Here’s a breakdown of why it’s likely to be absolutely essential by then:

Resource Depletion: Even with careful management, many of Earth’s resources are finite. By 3550, we may have exhausted easily accessible sources of fossil fuels, minerals, and other key materials. Sustainable technologies will be crucial for providing alternatives and ensuring continued access to essential resources.
Climate Change Impacts: The effects of climate change are already being felt, and they are projected to worsen over time. By 3550, we could be facing more extreme weather events, rising sea levels, and other significant challenges. Sustainable technologies will be necessary to mitigate these impacts and adapt to a changing environment.
Population Growth: If the human population continues to grow, the demand for resources and energy will increase. Sustainable technologies will be essential to meet these needs without further straining the planet’s resources.
Environmental Degradation: Pollution, deforestation, and other forms of environmental degradation could reach critical levels by 3550. Sustainable technologies will be needed to reverse this damage and restore ecosystems.

Essentially, by 3550, sustainable technology won’t be a choice, but a necessity for survival. It will be the foundation upon which societies function, providing:

Clean Energy: To power homes, transportation, and industries.
Essential Resources: Through closed-loop systems and resource recovery.
Environmental Protection: To maintain healthy ecosystems and a stable climate.
Sustainable Food Production: To feed a growing population.

It’s important to remember that the need for sustainable technology is not just something for the future. It’s something we need to be working on now. The choices we make today will have a profound impact on the world of 3550. By investing in sustainable technology and adopting sustainable practices, we can help ensure a healthy and prosperous future for generations to come.

COURTESY : Voith Group

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3550 ?

You’re right to think about the “where” as well as the “when” and “who” when it comes to sustainable technology in 3550! Here’s how we can consider the geographical and societal spaces where it will be essential:

1. Everywhere on Earth:

Urban Centers: Cities will likely be hubs of sustainable technology, with smart grids, eco-friendly buildings, advanced transportation systems, and vertical farms.
Rural Areas: Sustainable agriculture, renewable energy generation, and resource management will be crucial for maintaining thriving rural communities.
Remote Regions: Even in the most remote corners of the world, sustainable technology will be needed to provide access to clean water, energy, and essential resources.
Oceans and Atmosphere: Sustainable technologies will be vital for protecting and restoring marine ecosystems and for capturing and storing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

2. Beyond Earth:

Space Colonies: If humanity expands beyond Earth, sustainable technology will be essential for creating self-sustaining habitats on other planets or in space.
Resource Extraction: Sustainable methods for extracting resources from asteroids or other celestial bodies will be needed to support space exploration and colonization.

3. Within Societies:

Homes: Our homes will be equipped with smart systems to optimize energy use, manage resources, and minimize waste.
Workplaces: Sustainable technologies will be integrated into workplaces to reduce environmental impact and create healthier working environments.
Communities: Neighborhoods and communities will be designed with sustainability in mind, with green spaces, efficient transportation, and shared resources.

4. Across Industries:

Energy: Sustainable energy technologies will be needed to power all sectors of society, from homes and businesses to transportation and industry.
Agriculture: Sustainable farming practices will be essential for producing food in an environmentally responsible way.
Manufacturing: Sustainable manufacturing processes will be needed to reduce waste and minimize the use of resources.
Transportation: Sustainable transportation systems will be crucial for moving people and goods in an efficient and environmentally friendly way.

In essence, sustainable technology in 3550 will be needed in every aspect of life, everywhere on Earth (and potentially beyond). It will be woven into the fabric of society, providing the foundation for a healthy and prosperous future for all.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3550 ?

That’s a great question! It gets to the heart of how sustainable technology will need to function in 3550. Here’s how it will likely be required:

1. Seamless Integration:

Sustainable technology won’t be separate or optional; it will be deeply integrated into every aspect of life. Think of it like electricity today – we don’t think about how it works, it’s just there, powering everything.
This means that sustainability will be built into the design of everything from buildings and transportation systems to everyday products and services.

2. Closed-Loop Systems:

Resource management will be crucial. Sustainable technology will need to create closed-loop systems where resources are constantly recycled and reused, minimizing waste and the need for new extraction.
This could involve advanced recycling technologies, biodegradable materials, and manufacturing processes that minimize waste.

3. Automation and AI:

Artificial intelligence and automation will likely play a key role in optimizing resource use and minimizing environmental impact.
Imagine AI systems that can monitor energy consumption in real-time and adjust it to minimize waste, or robots that can efficiently sort and recycle materials.

4. Adaptability and Resilience:

The world of 3550 will likely still be facing environmental challenges. Sustainable technology will need to be adaptable and resilient, able to withstand extreme weather events and other environmental changes.
This could involve developing infrastructure that can adapt to changing conditions, or creating new ways to protect ecosystems from damage.

5. Decentralization:

Sustainable technology may need to be decentralized to some extent, with communities and individuals having more control over their own resources and energy production.
This could involve things like community-owned renewable energy systems or 3D printing technologies that allow people to produce their own goods locally.

6. Continuous Improvement:

Sustainable technology will need to be constantly evolving and improving to meet new challenges and adapt to changing conditions.
This will require ongoing research and development, as well as a commitment to innovation and continuous improvement.

In short, sustainable technology in 3550 will be essential, ubiquitous, and constantly evolving. It will be the foundation upon which societies function, ensuring a healthy and prosperous future for all.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3550 ?

It’s tough to give a specific case study for sustainable technology in 3550, as that’s far beyond any current data! But, we can create a hypothetical case study based on current trends and potential future advancements. This will help illustrate how such technology might function:

Case Study: The Lusitania Eco-City, 3550

Background: Rising sea levels in the 22nd century forced the relocation of many coastal cities. Lusitania, a city of 5 million, was built on a newly formed island chain using sustainable technology as its foundation.

Key Sustainable Technologies:

Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC): Lusitania is powered by OTEC, which harnesses the temperature difference between surface and deep ocean water to generate clean energy. This provides a constant, reliable power source with minimal environmental impact.
Advanced Carbon Capture & Utilization: The city has a network of atmospheric carbon capture facilities that remove CO2 and convert it into usable materials. This “captured carbon” is used to create bioplastics for construction, and even synthetic fuels for specialized vehicles.
Closed-Loop Resource Management: Lusitania operates on a near-total circular economy. Advanced AI-powered recycling centers break down waste at a molecular level, allowing for the reuse of virtually all materials. 3D printing technology enables on-demand manufacturing of goods using recycled resources.
Vertical Farming & Aquaculture: Food production is localized through a network of vertical farms and sustainable aquaculture facilities. These high-tech farms minimize land use, water consumption, and the need for pesticides, providing a secure and sustainable food supply.
Smart Infrastructure: Lusitania’s infrastructure is managed by a sophisticated AI system. This system optimizes energy use, traffic flow, and resource distribution in real-time, minimizing waste and maximizing efficiency.
Bioremediation & Ecosystem Restoration: The city employs advanced bioremediation techniques to clean up pollution and restore damaged ecosystems. Genetically engineered microorganisms are used to break down pollutants in the surrounding waters and soil, ensuring a healthy environment.

Outcomes:

Carbon Neutrality: Lusitania has achieved carbon neutrality, with its OTEC power generation and carbon capture technology offsetting any remaining emissions.
Resource Security: The city’s closed-loop resource management system ensures access to essential resources, even as global supplies dwindle.
Environmental Health: Lusitania’s focus on bioremediation and ecosystem restoration has resulted in clean air, water, and thriving ecosystems.
Economic Prosperity: The city’s sustainable technologies have created new industries and jobs, driving economic growth and prosperity.
High Quality of Life: Lusitania’s residents enjoy a high quality of life, with access to clean energy, healthy food, and a thriving environment.

Lessons Learned:

Long-term Vision: Lusitania’s success highlights the importance of long-term vision and planning when it comes to sustainable development.
Technological Innovation: Continuous investment in research and development is crucial for creating and improving sustainable technologies.
Systems Thinking: A holistic approach to sustainability is essential, with all aspects of society and the environment considered.
Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource depletion requires international cooperation and the sharing of sustainable technologies.

This hypothetical case study illustrates how sustainable technology could be integrated into a future city, creating a thriving and environmentally responsible society. While it’s just speculation, it provides a glimpse into the potential of sustainable technology to shape a positive future.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3550 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 3550: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 3550. While predicting specific technological advancements over such a vast timescale is inherently speculative, we can extrapolate from current trends and scientific principles to envision a world where sustainability is deeply integrated into every facet of human life. This paper examines potential advancements in energy, resource management, environmental remediation, and societal structures, highlighting the interconnectedness of these domains and the crucial role of technological innovation in ensuring a thriving future for humanity.

1. Introduction:

The challenges facing humanity today – climate change, resource depletion, pollution – underscore the urgent need for sustainable solutions. By 3550, it is posited that these solutions will have become not just desirable, but essential for survival. This paper explores the potential technological landscape of that future, focusing on how sustainable practices might be woven into the fabric of everyday life.

2. Energy:

Fusion Power: Widespread adoption of commercially viable fusion power plants, providing clean and abundant energy. Advanced materials science and plasma containment technologies will be key.
Space-Based Solar Power: Large-scale solar arrays in orbit, beaming energy to Earth via microwave or laser transmission, supplementing terrestrial renewable sources.
Advanced Energy Storage: Highly efficient and compact energy storage solutions, potentially based on novel battery chemistries or other energy storage mechanisms, enabling seamless integration of intermittent renewable sources.

3. Resource Management:

Circular Economy Mastery: Near-total resource recovery and recycling through advanced material science and AI-powered sorting and reprocessing facilities. “Waste” as a concept largely eliminated.
Atmospheric Carbon Capture and Utilization: Large-scale deployment of carbon capture technologies, utilizing captured CO2 as a feedstock for manufacturing fuels, plastics, and other valuable products.
Sustainable Materials: Widespread use of bio-engineered materials, biodegradable polymers, and other sustainable alternatives to traditional materials, minimizing environmental impact.

4. Environmental Remediation:

Advanced Bioremediation: Use of genetically engineered microorganisms and other biological agents to clean up pollution and restore damaged ecosystems, including oceans, soil, and atmosphere.
Geoengineering Technologies: Potentially, controlled and localized geoengineering techniques to mitigate extreme weather events and manage regional climates, though with careful consideration of potential unintended consequences.
Ecosystem Restoration: Active restoration of degraded ecosystems through a combination of technological intervention and ecological principles, promoting biodiversity and ecosystem resilience.

5. Societal Structures:

Smart Infrastructure: AI-powered smart grids, transportation networks, and urban planning systems that optimize resource use and minimize environmental impact.
Decentralized Production: Localized manufacturing and resource production through 3D printing and other advanced technologies, reducing reliance on global supply chains and transportation.
Sustainable Agriculture: Highly efficient vertical farms, hydroponics, and other advanced agricultural techniques, maximizing food production while minimizing land use and environmental impact.

6. Challenges and Considerations:

Technological Feasibility: While the technologies described are plausible extrapolations, unforeseen scientific breakthroughs will be crucial for their realization.
Social and Ethical Implications: Careful consideration must be given to the social and ethical implications of advanced technologies, including potential job displacement, privacy concerns, and equitable access to resources.
Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource depletion requires international cooperation and the sharing of knowledge and technology.

7. Conclusion:

The year 3550 presents both immense challenges and incredible opportunities. By embracing innovation and prioritizing sustainability, humanity can create a future where technology serves not just our immediate needs, but also the long-term health and prosperity of the planet. The vision outlined in this white paper represents a potential pathway towards such a future, one where sustainable technology empowers humanity to thrive in harmony with the natural world.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3550 ?

You’re thinking ahead! It’s fascinating to imagine how sustainable technology might revolutionize industries in 3550. Here are some potential applications:

1. Manufacturing:

Closed-Loop Production: Factories could operate on closed-loop systems, where raw materials are sourced sustainably, products are manufactured with minimal waste, and everything is recycled at the end of its life. Imagine factories that produce zero waste, with every byproduct being reused or repurposed.
On-Demand Manufacturing: 3D printing and other advanced manufacturing technologies could enable on-demand production of goods, reducing the need for mass production and long-distance transportation. This could lead to more localized and sustainable manufacturing.
Bio-Integrated Manufacturing: Imagine factories that use biological processes to create materials and products. This could involve growing materials like bioplastics or using genetically engineered microorganisms to produce chemicals and fuels.

2. Energy Production:

Fusion Power Plants: Fusion energy could become the primary source of industrial power, providing clean and abundant energy for factories and other industrial facilities.
Space-Based Solar for Industry: Industries could be powered by energy beamed down from space-based solar arrays, providing a constant and reliable source of renewable energy.
Decentralized Energy Systems: Factories and industrial facilities could generate their own energy through a combination of renewable sources, such as solar, wind, and geothermal, reducing reliance on centralized power grids.

3. Agriculture:

Vertical Farms: Vertical farms could become the primary source of food production, with crops grown in controlled environments using minimal land and water. These farms could be located in urban areas, reducing transportation costs and ensuring access to fresh produce.
Precision Agriculture: Advanced sensors and AI could be used to optimize crop yields and minimize the use of resources like water and fertilizers. This could lead to more sustainable and efficient agriculture.
Sustainable Aquaculture: Fish farms could be designed to minimize environmental impact and ensure the sustainable production of seafood. This could involve using closed-loop systems that recycle water and prevent pollution.

4. Resource Extraction:

Sustainable Mining: New technologies could be developed to extract minerals and other resources from the Earth in a more sustainable way, minimizing environmental impact and reducing waste.
Asteroid Mining: If humanity expands into space, resources could be extracted from asteroids and other celestial bodies, reducing the need to mine Earth’s resources.
Resource Recovery: Advanced recycling technologies could be used to recover valuable materials from waste, reducing the need for new resource extraction.

5. Transportation:

Sustainable Transportation Systems: Industries could rely on sustainable transportation systems, such as electric vehicles, high-speed trains, and even potentially advanced air transport, to move goods and people in an environmentally friendly way.
Localized Supply Chains: The rise of on-demand manufacturing and decentralized production could lead to more localized supply chains, reducing the need for long-distance transportation.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology could be applied in industries in 3550. It’s important to remember that these technologies are still in their early stages of development, but they hold great potential for creating a more sustainable future.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3550 ?

You’re asking about the really long-term view! Research and development for sustainable technology in 3550 is a fascinating concept. While we can’t know the specifics, here’s how we can imagine it might work:

1. Foundational Research:

Fundamental Science: Continued research in physics, chemistry, biology, and materials science will be crucial. This could lead to breakthroughs in areas like energy generation (fusion, antimatter), material science (superconductors, self-healing materials), and biological engineering (synthetic biology, genetic engineering).
Understanding Complex Systems: Research will focus on understanding complex systems like climate, ecosystems, and resource flows. This will be essential for developing sustainable solutions that work in harmony with nature.

2. Applied Research and Development:

Energy Technologies: Research will continue on improving existing renewable energy technologies like solar, wind, and geothermal, as well as exploring new energy sources like fusion and space-based solar power.
Resource Management: Scientists and engineers will develop new ways to recycle and reuse resources, create biodegradable materials, and capture carbon from the atmosphere.
Environmental Remediation: Research will focus on developing advanced bioremediation techniques, restoring damaged ecosystems, and potentially even influencing climate on a local or regional scale.
Sustainable Agriculture: Scientists will work on developing new agricultural techniques that can produce food with minimal environmental impact, such as vertical farming, hydroponics, and precision agriculture.
Smart Technologies: Researchers will develop advanced AI and automation systems that can optimize resource use, manage infrastructure, and minimize waste.

3. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

Collaboration Across Fields: Research and development for sustainable technology in 3550 will require collaboration across many different fields, including science, engineering, social sciences, and even the arts and humanities.
Global Collaboration: International cooperation will be essential for sharing knowledge, resources, and technology to address global challenges.

4. Long-Term Thinking:

Generational Research: Some research projects may take decades or even centuries to complete. Scientists and engineers will need to think long-term and be willing to invest in research that may not have immediate payoffs.
Ethical Considerations: As new technologies are developed, it will be important to consider their ethical implications and ensure that they are used responsibly.

5. Continuous Innovation:

Adaptive Technologies: Sustainable technologies will need to be constantly evolving and improving to meet new challenges and adapt to changing conditions.
Open Innovation: Sharing knowledge and ideas will be crucial for accelerating the development of sustainable technologies.

In essence, research and development for sustainable technology in 3550 will be an ongoing process, driven by curiosity, a commitment to sustainability, and a desire to create a better future for all. It will require a long-term perspective, interdisciplinary collaboration, and a willingness to embrace innovation.

courtesy : NPTEL-NOC IITM

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.