Sustainable Technology Of 3540

Sustainable Technology of 3540 ?

It seems you’re asking about sustainable technology in the year 3540. While it’s impossible to predict the future with certainty, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and advancements.

Here are some potential areas of sustainable technology in 3540:

Advanced Renewable Energy: Solar, wind, and other renewable energy sources will likely be highly efficient and integrated into everyday life. We might see space-based solar power, advanced energy storage solutions, and even new forms of energy generation we can’t imagine today.
Circular Economy: The concept of “reduce, reuse, recycle” will be deeply ingrained. Products will be designed for disassembly and reuse, minimizing waste and the need for raw materials.
Hyper-Efficient Resource Management: Technologies for water purification, waste management, and resource extraction will be incredibly advanced, ensuring sustainable use of Earth’s resources.
Sustainable Agriculture: Food production will likely rely on advanced techniques like vertical farming, hydroponics, and precision agriculture, minimizing land use and environmental impact.
Green Transportation: Transportation will be dominated by electric vehicles, hyperloops, and other sustainable modes, powered by renewable energy and integrated into smart city systems.
Biotechnology and Biomimicry: We might see breakthroughs in materials science inspired by nature, leading to biodegradable plastics, self-healing materials, and other sustainable alternatives.
Artificial Intelligence and Automation: AI will play a crucial role in optimizing resource use, managing energy grids, and automating sustainable practices across industries.

Challenges and Considerations:

Technological Advancements: Predicting specific technologies over 1500 years is challenging. New discoveries and innovations could completely change the landscape.
Social and Economic Factors: The adoption of sustainable technologies depends on societal values, economic incentives, and global cooperation.
Environmental Changes: Climate change and other environmental challenges could necessitate the development of unforeseen technologies for adaptation and mitigation.

In conclusion, the sustainable technology of 3540 will likely be characterized by highly efficient renewable energy, a circular economy, advanced resource management, and integration of AI and biotechnology. However, the specific technologies and their impact will depend on various factors, including future scientific breakthroughs and societal choices.

What is Sustainable Technology of 3540 ?

It seems you’re interested in what sustainable technology might look like in the year 3540! That’s quite a leap into the future, and while we can’t know for sure, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and advancements.

Here are some potential areas of sustainable technology in 3540:

Advanced Renewable Energy: Solar, wind, and other renewable energy sources will likely be incredibly efficient and seamlessly integrated into our lives. We might see space-based solar power, advanced energy storage solutions, and even entirely new forms of energy generation that we can’t even imagine today.
Circular Economy: The concept of “reduce, reuse, recycle” will be deeply ingrained in every aspect of society. Products will be designed for easy disassembly and reuse, minimizing waste and the need for raw materials.
Hyper-Efficient Resource Management: Technologies for water purification, waste management, and resource extraction will be incredibly advanced, ensuring the sustainable use of Earth’s resources.
Sustainable Agriculture: Food production will likely rely on advanced techniques like vertical farming, hydroponics, and precision agriculture, minimizing land use and environmental impact.
Green Transportation: Transportation will be dominated by electric vehicles, hyperloops, and other sustainable modes, powered by renewable energy and integrated into smart city systems.
Biotechnology and Biomimicry: We might see breakthroughs in materials science inspired by nature, leading to biodegradable plastics, self-healing materials, and other sustainable alternatives.
Artificial Intelligence and Automation: AI will play a crucial role in optimizing resource use, managing energy grids, and automating sustainable practices across industries.

Challenges and Considerations:

Technological Advancements: Predicting specific technologies over 1500 years is incredibly challenging. New discoveries and innovations could completely change the landscape.
Social and Economic Factors: The adoption of sustainable technologies depends on societal values, economic incentives, and global cooperation.
Environmental Changes: Climate change and other environmental challenges could necessitate the development of unforeseen technologies for adaptation and mitigation.

In conclusion, the sustainable technology of 3540 will likely be characterized by highly efficient renewable energy, a circular economy, advanced resource management, and the integration of AI and biotechnology. However, the specific technologies and their impact will depend on various factors, including future scientific breakthroughs and societal choices.

It’s fun to speculate about the future! If you have any more questions or want to explore a specific area of sustainable technology, feel free to ask.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3540 ?

That’s a great question! When we talk about sustainable technology in the distant future like 3540, it’s not just about what the technology is, but also who needs it and why. Here’s a breakdown:

1. Humanity as a Whole:

Survival and Thriving: In 3540, sustainable technology will be crucial for humanity’s continued survival and well-being. This includes having access to clean energy, food, water, and resources in a way that doesn’t harm the planet.
Adapting to Change: By 3540, humanity might have faced significant environmental changes. Sustainable technology will be essential for adapting to these changes, whether it’s rising sea levels, extreme weather, or resource scarcity.
Interplanetary Expansion: If humans have expanded beyond Earth, sustainable technology will be critical for establishing and maintaining off-world settlements. This includes things like closed-loop life support systems, in-situ resource utilization, and sustainable energy generation.

2. Future Generations:

Inheriting a Healthy Planet: People in 3540 will depend on sustainable technology to ensure they inherit a healthy and habitable planet from their ancestors. This means minimizing pollution, preserving biodiversity, and avoiding irreversible environmental damage.
Resource Security: Future generations will rely on sustainable technology to have access to the resources they need, including energy, water, and raw materials. This requires responsible consumption, efficient resource management, and a circular economy.

3. The Environment:

Protecting Ecosystems: Sustainable technology in 3540 will be essential for protecting and restoring Earth’s ecosystems. This includes technologies for pollution cleanup, habitat restoration, and conservation of biodiversity.
Mitigating Climate Change: Even in 3540, it’s likely that sustainable technology will play a role in mitigating the effects of climate change and preventing further damage to the environment.

4. Other Potential Needs:

Other Species: In a future where humanity has advanced significantly, there might be a greater focus on the well-being of other species. Sustainable technology could be used to protect endangered animals, preserve habitats, and even help other species adapt to environmental changes.
Unknown Challenges: It’s impossible to predict all the challenges that humanity might face in 3540. Sustainable technology will need to be adaptable and innovative to address unforeseen problems and ensure a positive future.

In essence, the need for sustainable technology in 3540 will be driven by the fundamental requirements for human survival, the well-being of future generations, the health of the environment, and the need to adapt to an ever-changing world.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3540 ?

The need for sustainable technology in 3540 is a bit of a tricky question because it’s not a single point in time, but rather a continuous requirement. It’s not like flipping a switch; it’s an ongoing process. Here’s a breakdown of when sustainable technology will be required in 3540 and beyond:

Continuously: The most accurate answer is always. Sustainability isn’t a destination, it’s a journey. In 3540, just as it is now, sustainable practices and technologies will be necessary to maintain a healthy planet and a thriving society. The need won’t suddenly appear in 3540; it will be an ongoing, ever-present requirement.
For Existing Challenges: Many of the environmental challenges we face today, such as climate change, resource depletion, and pollution, are likely to persist, at least in some form, into 3540. Sustainable technologies will be essential for managing these ongoing issues and mitigating their impacts.
For New Challenges: It’s almost certain that new challenges will arise between now and 3540. These could be related to population growth, new forms of pollution, unexpected environmental changes, or even challenges we can’t yet imagine. Sustainable technology will need to be adaptable and innovative to address these unforeseen problems.
For Maintaining Progress: Even if some major environmental problems are solved by 3540, the need for sustainable technology won’t disappear. It will be crucial for maintaining progress, preventing backsliding, and ensuring that future generations can continue to thrive.
For Future Development: If humanity expands beyond Earth by 3540, sustainable technologies will be absolutely essential for establishing and maintaining off-world settlements. These technologies will need to provide for basic needs like food, water, and energy in a way that’s both efficient and environmentally responsible.

So, to summarize: The need for sustainable technology in 3540 won’t be a one-time event. It will be a constant and evolving requirement, driven by existing challenges, emerging problems, the need to maintain progress, and the potential for future development. It’s not about a specific when, but rather an ongoing always.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3540 ?

The need for sustainable technology in 3540 (and beyond) won’t be confined to a single location. It will be a global, and potentially even extra-terrestrial, necessity. Here’s a breakdown of where sustainable technology will be required:

Everywhere on Earth: Sustainable technology will be needed in every region of the planet, from bustling cities to remote rural areas. This includes:
- Urban Centers: Sustainable solutions for energy, transportation, waste management, and resource consumption will be crucial in densely populated areas.
- Rural Communities: Sustainable agriculture, water management, and access to clean energy will be essential for supporting rural populations and preserving natural resources.
- Developing Nations: Sustainable technology will be particularly important for developing countries, allowing them to grow and prosper without repeating the environmental mistakes of the past.
- Extreme Environments: Sustainable technologies will be needed for human habitation in challenging environments like deserts, arctic regions, and even underwater.
Beyond Earth (If applicable): If humanity has expanded beyond Earth by 3540, the need for sustainable technology will be even more critical. This includes:
- Space Habitats: Closed-loop life support systems, in-situ resource utilization, and sustainable energy generation will be essential for long-term space habitation.
- Planetary Colonies: Establishing self-sustaining colonies on other planets will require advanced technologies for resource extraction, food production, and environmental management.
Specific Areas of Focus: Within these locations, certain areas will require particular attention:
- Energy Production and Distribution: Sustainable energy infrastructure will be needed everywhere, from individual homes to large-scale power plants.
- Transportation Networks: Sustainable transportation systems, including electric vehicles, hyperloops, and other innovative solutions, will be essential for moving people and goods efficiently and with minimal environmental impact.
- Agricultural Systems: Sustainable agriculture will be crucial for feeding the global population while minimizing land use, water consumption, and pollution.
- Manufacturing and Industry: Sustainable manufacturing processes, using recycled materials and minimizing waste, will be necessary for producing the goods and services that society needs.

In short, the need for sustainable technology in 3540 will be universal. It will be required in every corner of the Earth, and potentially beyond, to ensure a healthy planet and a thriving future for humanity.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3540 ?

It’s fascinating to think about how sustainable technology might be developed and implemented in 3540! Here’s a breakdown of how it might be required:

1. Continuous Innovation and Adaptation:

Ongoing Research and Development: Sustainable technology in 3540 won’t be static. It will require continuous research and development to improve existing technologies, discover new solutions, and adapt to evolving challenges.
Global Collaboration: International cooperation will be crucial for sharing knowledge, resources, and best practices. This could involve collaborative research projects, technology transfer agreements, and joint efforts to address global environmental problems.

2. Integration and Implementation:

Smart Infrastructure: Sustainable technologies will need to be seamlessly integrated into infrastructure, including energy grids, transportation networks, and urban planning. This might involve smart cities that optimize resource use and minimize environmental impact.
Incentives and Policies: Governments and organizations will likely play a role in promoting the adoption of sustainable technologies through policies, incentives, and regulations. This could include carbon pricing, subsidies for renewable energy, and standards for sustainable products.
Education and Awareness: Public awareness and education will be essential for fostering a culture of sustainability. People will need to understand the importance of sustainable practices and be empowered to make informed choices.

3. Resource Management and Circular Economy:

Resource Efficiency: Sustainable technologies will need to be highly resource-efficient, minimizing the use of raw materials and maximizing the reuse and recycling of resources. This could involve advanced materials science, closed-loop manufacturing processes, and innovative waste management systems.
Circular Economy: The concept of a circular economy, where resources are kept in use for as long as possible, will be central to sustainable technology in 3540. This will require designing products for durability, repairability, and recyclability.

4. Ethical Considerations and Social Equity:

Environmental Justice: Sustainable technology should be developed and implemented in a way that promotes environmental justice and avoids exacerbating existing inequalities. This means ensuring that everyone has access to clean energy, clean water, and other essential resources.
Ethical Use of Technology: As technology advances, ethical considerations will become increasingly important. This includes ensuring that technologies are used responsibly, respect privacy, and do not have unintended negative consequences.

5. Resilience and Adaptability:

Climate Change Adaptation: Sustainable technology will need to be resilient to the impacts of climate change and adaptable to changing environmental conditions. This could involve developing drought-resistant crops, flood-proof infrastructure, and technologies for disaster preparedness.
Flexibility and Innovation: The ability to adapt to unforeseen challenges and embrace new innovations will be crucial for ensuring long-term sustainability. This requires fostering a culture of creativity, experimentation, and continuous learning.

In essence, the implementation of sustainable technology in 3540 will require a multi-faceted approach, involving continuous innovation, global collaboration, smart infrastructure, ethical considerations, and a commitment to resilience and adaptability.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3540 ?

It’s tough to give a specific case study for sustainable technology in 3540, as that’s so far in the future! But, we can create a hypothetical scenario based on current trends and extrapolate what might be needed. Here’s a possible case study:

Case Study: The Revitalization of the Amazon Rainforest in 3540

Background:

By 3540, climate change and deforestation have severely impacted the Amazon rainforest. Once a lush and biodiverse ecosystem, it has become degraded, with significant loss of species and diminished capacity to regulate the global climate. Recognizing the crucial role of the Amazon, a global initiative is launched to revitalize the rainforest using advanced sustainable technologies.

Challenges:

Restoring Biodiversity: Reintroducing lost species and re-establishing complex ecological relationships.
Reversing Soil Degradation: Restoring fertility to depleted soils and preventing further erosion.
Managing Water Resources: Ensuring adequate water supply for the rainforest ecosystem, especially in the face of changing climate patterns.
Preventing Deforestation: Implementing measures to prevent illegal logging and land clearing.
Engaging Local Communities: Involving indigenous communities in the revitalization efforts and ensuring their traditional knowledge is incorporated.

Sustainable Technologies Deployed:

Advanced Ecological Restoration: Drones and AI-powered systems are used to map the rainforest, analyze soil conditions, and strategically plant native species.
Biotechnology for Soil Remediation: Microorganisms and bio-engineered solutions are used to restore soil fertility and enhance nutrient cycling.
Atmospheric Water Generation: Technologies that capture moisture from the air are deployed to supplement rainfall and provide water for the ecosystem.
Renewable Energy Microgrids: Solar and other renewable energy sources power local communities and research stations, reducing reliance on fossil fuels.
Precision Agriculture and Agroforestry: Sustainable farming practices are promoted in surrounding areas to reduce pressure on the rainforest and provide economic opportunities for local communities.
AI-Powered Monitoring and Enforcement: Satellite imagery and AI algorithms are used to monitor the rainforest for illegal activities and enforce environmental regulations.

Outcomes:

Biodiversity Recovery: Gradual return of native species and re-establishment of ecological balance.
Soil Regeneration: Improvement in soil health and fertility, leading to increased forest productivity.
Water Security: Enhanced water availability for the rainforest ecosystem, improving its resilience to drought.
Reduced Deforestation: Effective monitoring and enforcement, combined with sustainable economic alternatives, significantly decrease illegal logging and land clearing.
Community Empowerment: Local communities are actively involved in the revitalization efforts, benefiting from sustainable economic opportunities and preserving their cultural heritage.

Lessons Learned:

Long-Term Commitment: Revitalizing a complex ecosystem like the Amazon requires a long-term commitment and sustained effort.
Technological Innovation: Advanced technologies play a crucial role in accelerating restoration and addressing complex challenges.
Collaboration and Integration: Success depends on collaboration between scientists, governments, local communities, and international organizations.
Holistic Approach: A holistic approach that addresses ecological, social, and economic factors is essential for achieving sustainable outcomes.

This hypothetical case study illustrates how sustainable technology in 3540 could be used to address a major environmental challenge and restore a vital ecosystem. It highlights the potential of advanced technologies, combined with collaboration and a long-term perspective, to create a more sustainable future

COURTESY : Voith Group

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3540 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 3540: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

Predicting the future is inherently speculative, but by extrapolating current trends and technological advancements, we can envision a future where sustainable technology is not just an aspiration, but a fundamental cornerstone of human civilization. This white paper explores potential advancements in sustainable technology by the year 3540, focusing on key areas such as energy, resource management, agriculture, transportation, and the integration of artificial intelligence. It also addresses the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead in achieving a truly sustainable future.

1. Introduction:

The pursuit of sustainability is a continuous journey, demanding constant innovation and adaptation. By 3540, it is envisioned that sustainable technology will be deeply ingrained in every facet of human life, enabling a harmonious relationship with the planet and ensuring a thriving future for generations to come. This paper outlines potential breakthroughs and their implications.

2. Advanced Energy Solutions:

Space-Based Solar Power: Large-scale solar arrays in orbit capture abundant solar energy and transmit it wirelessly to Earth, providing a clean and inexhaustible power source.
Fusion Energy: Controlled nuclear fusion becomes a viable and efficient energy source, offering a safe and sustainable alternative to fossil fuels.
Ambient Energy Harvesting: Technologies that capture energy from the environment, such as vibrations, heat, and electromagnetic radiation, power small devices and sensors, creating a network of distributed energy generation.
Advanced Energy Storage: Highly efficient and long-lasting energy storage solutions, such as advanced batteries and pumped hydro storage, enable the seamless integration of renewable energy sources into the grid.

3. Circular Economy and Resource Management:

Closed-Loop Material Cycles: Products are designed for disassembly and reuse, minimizing waste and the need for virgin materials. Advanced recycling technologies enable the efficient recovery of valuable resources from discarded products.
Resource Optimization: AI-powered systems monitor and manage resource flows, optimizing consumption and minimizing waste across industries and supply chains.
Bioremediation and Biomanufacturing: Biological processes are used to clean up pollution, remediate contaminated environments, and create sustainable materials.

4. Sustainable Agriculture and Food Production:

Vertical Farming and Hydroponics: Food is grown in controlled environments, maximizing yields while minimizing land use, water consumption, and the need for pesticides.
Precision Agriculture: Advanced sensors and AI algorithms optimize irrigation, fertilization, and pest control, reducing resource inputs and environmental impact.
Cultivated Meat and Alternative Proteins: Technologies for producing meat and other protein sources without relying on traditional animal agriculture reduce greenhouse gas emissions and land use.

5. Green Transportation:

Electric and Autonomous Vehicles: Electric vehicles powered by renewable energy dominate transportation, reducing air pollution and dependence on fossil fuels. Autonomous driving systems optimize traffic flow and improve safety.
Hyperloop and Maglev Trains: High-speed transportation systems, such as hyperloops and maglev trains, connect cities and regions, reducing travel times and carbon emissions.
Personal Air Mobility: Electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft provide a sustainable mode of urban air transportation, reducing congestion and travel times.

6. Artificial Intelligence and Sustainability:

Smart Grids and Energy Management: AI algorithms optimize energy distribution and consumption, reducing waste and improving grid efficiency.
Environmental Monitoring and Prediction: AI-powered systems analyze vast amounts of data to monitor environmental conditions, predict natural disasters, and inform conservation efforts.
Sustainable Design and Manufacturing: AI tools assist in the design of sustainable products and manufacturing processes, optimizing resource use and minimizing environmental impact.

7. Challenges and Opportunities:

Technological Development: Continued investment in research and development is crucial for realizing the full potential of sustainable technologies.
Policy and Governance: Supportive policies and regulations are needed to incentivize the adoption of sustainable practices and ensure a level playing field.
Social and Economic Equity: The transition to a sustainable future must be equitable, ensuring that everyone benefits from the new technologies and opportunities.
Global Cooperation: Addressing global environmental challenges requires international collaboration and coordinated action.

8. Conclusion:

The sustainable technology of 3540 holds the promise of a world where humanity lives in harmony with nature, enjoying a high quality of life while preserving the planet for future generations. Achieving this vision will require continuous innovation, collaboration, and a commitment to ethical and sustainable practices. By embracing the challenges and seizing the opportunities that lie ahead, we can create a future where both humanity and the planet thrive.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3540 ?

While it’s a thought experiment to imagine industrial applications of sustainable technology in 3540, we can extrapolate from current trends and imagine some possibilities:

1. Advanced Manufacturing and Resource Management:

Closed-Loop Production Systems: Factories operate on closed-loop systems where waste is virtually eliminated. Every byproduct is either reused, recycled, or transformed into something valuable. This relies on advanced material science, AI-driven optimization, and on-site resource recovery technologies.
On-Demand Manufacturing with Sustainable Materials: 3D printing and other additive manufacturing technologies utilize sustainable, bio-based, or recycled materials to create products on demand, minimizing waste and transportation needs.
AI-Powered Supply Chain Optimization: AI algorithms manage every step of the supply chain, from sourcing raw materials to delivering finished products, ensuring maximum efficiency and minimal environmental impact.

2. Energy-Intensive Industries:

Carbon-Neutral Steel Production: Steel manufacturing, a traditionally energy-intensive industry, is revolutionized by technologies that eliminate carbon emissions. This could involve using hydrogen as a reducing agent or employing advanced carbon capture and utilization techniques.
Sustainable Mining and Resource Extraction: Mining operations utilize autonomous vehicles, AI-powered resource mapping, and in-situ resource extraction techniques to minimize environmental disruption and maximize resource recovery.
Renewable Energy Integration: Industries heavily rely on renewable energy sources, such as space-based solar power, fusion energy, or advanced geothermal systems, to power their operations.

3. Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing:

Biorefineries: Industrial facilities utilize biorefineries to convert biomass and organic waste into valuable products, such as biofuels, bioplastics, and biochemicals.
Sustainable Materials: Biomanufacturing processes create sustainable alternatives to traditional materials, such as biodegradable plastics, self-healing materials, and high-performance composites.
Industrial Symbiosis: Industries collaborate in industrial symbiosis networks, where the waste products of one industry become valuable resources for another, creating a circular economy at an industrial scale.

4. Infrastructure and Construction:

Self-Healing Infrastructure: Buildings and infrastructure are constructed with self-healing materials that can repair damage automatically, reducing maintenance costs and extending their lifespan.
Smart and Adaptive Buildings: Buildings are equipped with advanced sensors and AI systems that optimize energy use, water consumption, and indoor environmental quality.
Modular and Prefabricated Construction: Construction methods rely on modular and prefabricated components, reducing waste and construction time.

5. Transportation and Logistics:

Autonomous and Electric Fleets: Industrial transportation and logistics rely on fleets of autonomous electric vehicles, optimizing routes and minimizing emissions.
Hyperloop and Maglev Networks: High-speed transportation systems, such as hyperloops and maglev trains, connect industrial facilities and distribution centers, enabling efficient and sustainable movement of goods.
Drone Delivery: Drones are used for last-mile delivery of goods, reducing traffic congestion and emissions in urban areas.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology could be applied in industries by 3540. The key themes are resource efficiency, renewable energy integration, circular economy principles, and the use of AI and biotechnology to optimize processes and minimize environmental impact.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3540 ?

It’s exciting to imagine the kind of research and development that might be happening in 3540 to advance sustainable technology! Here are some potential areas of focus, extrapolating from current trends and needs:

1. Advanced Materials Science:

Bio-Integrated Materials: Developing materials that can seamlessly integrate with living organisms, for applications in regenerative medicine, environmental sensing, and even building materials that “grow” themselves.
Adaptive and Responsive Materials: Creating materials that can change their properties in response to environmental stimuli, for use in smart buildings, self-healing infrastructure, and adaptive clothing.
Extreme-Performance Materials: Designing materials with exceptional strength, durability, and resistance to extreme conditions, for use in space exploration, deep-sea exploration, and building resilient infrastructure.

2. Energy Generation and Storage:

Exotic Energy Sources: Exploring and harnessing new forms of energy, such as zero-point energy, or developing more efficient ways to utilize existing sources like geothermal and nuclear fusion.
Advanced Energy Storage: Creating revolutionary energy storage solutions that go beyond batteries, such as highly efficient capacitors, magnetic energy storage, or even ways to store energy in the fabric of space-time.
Wireless Energy Transmission: Developing technologies for efficient and long-range wireless energy transmission, enabling the distribution of energy from space-based solar power or other remote sources.

3. Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing:

Synthetic Biology: Engineering new biological systems to perform specific tasks, such as producing biofuels, creating sustainable materials, or even cleaning up pollution.
Bioprinting and Tissue Engineering: Developing advanced bioprinting techniques to create complex tissues and organs for medical applications, or even to “grow” sustainable products and materials.
Genetic Engineering for Sustainability: Using genetic engineering to enhance the sustainability of agriculture, such as creating crops that are more resistant to drought, pests, or disease.

4. Artificial Intelligence and Robotics:

AI for Environmental Management: Developing AI systems that can analyze vast amounts of environmental data to predict and mitigate natural disasters, optimize resource use, and manage ecosystems.
Autonomous Robotics for Sustainable Practices: Creating robots that can perform tasks such as planting trees, cleaning up pollution, or maintaining infrastructure, freeing up human labor and improving efficiency.
AI-Driven Design for Sustainability: Using AI to design products and systems that are inherently sustainable, optimizing for resource efficiency, recyclability, and minimal environmental impact.

5. Space and Planetary Science:

In-Situ Resource Utilization: Developing technologies to extract resources from asteroids, moons, or other planets, enabling sustainable space exploration and potentially providing resources for Earth.
Terraforming and Planetary Engineering: Researching the possibility of terraforming other planets to make them habitable for humans, or developing technologies to engineer Earth’s environment to mitigate climate change.
Space-Based Solar Power: Developing and deploying large-scale solar arrays in space to capture abundant solar energy and transmit it wirelessly to Earth.

6. Social and Ethical Considerations:

Sustainable Development Pathways: Researching and modeling different pathways for achieving sustainable development, taking into account social, economic, and environmental factors.
Ethical Implications of Technology: Exploring the ethical implications of advanced technologies, such as AI and genetic engineering, to ensure they are used responsibly and for the benefit of humanity.
Global Cooperation and Governance: Developing frameworks for international cooperation and governance to address global environmental challenges and promote sustainable development.

These are just a few examples of the kind of research and development that might be happening in 3540 to advance sustainable technology. The key themes are pushing the boundaries of science and technology, integrating different disciplines, and addressing the social and ethical implications of new advancements.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.