Sustainable Technology of 3450

Leave a Comment / Sustainable Technology of 3450 / By

Sustainable Technology of 3450 ?

It appears you’re interested in sustainable technology, possibly related to a specific project or code (3450). While the number itself doesn’t have a direct correlation to sustainable technology, I can provide you with a broad overview of this important field.

What is Sustainable Technology?

Sustainable technology encompasses a wide range of innovations and practices that aim to minimize negative impacts on the environment while supporting economic and social development. It involves using resources efficiently, reducing pollution, and promoting the use of renewable energy sources.

Key Areas of Sustainable Technology

  • Renewable Energy: This includes solar, wind, hydro, geothermal, and biomass energy sources, which are crucial for reducing our reliance on fossil fuels.
  • Energy Efficiency: Developing technologies and practices that reduce energy consumption in buildings, transportation, and industries.
  • Waste Management: Innovative solutions for reducing waste generation, promoting recycling and composting, and developing biodegradable materials.
  • Sustainable Agriculture: Practices that focus on increasing crop yields while minimizing environmental impact, such as precision farming and organic farming.
  • Green Building: Designing and constructing buildings that are energy-efficient, use sustainable materials, and have minimal environmental impact.  
  • Sustainable Transportation: Developing electric vehicles, improving public transportation, and promoting cycling and walking to reduce emissions from the transportation sector.

Examples of Sustainable Technology

  • Solar panels
  • Wind turbines
  • Electric vehicles
  • LED lighting
  • Green roofs
  • Water filtration systems
  • Composting systems

Importance of Sustainable Technology

Sustainable technology is essential for addressing some of the most pressing challenges facing our planet, including climate change, resource depletion, and pollution. By adopting sustainable practices and technologies, we can create a more environmentally friendly and sustainable future for generations to come.

If you have any specific questions about sustainable technology or if you can provide more context about the “3450” reference, feel free to ask!

What is Sustainable Technology of 3450 ?

Unfortunately, “3450” doesn’t have a widely recognized association with any specific sustainable technology. It’s possible that this number is:

  • A code or reference number: Used within a particular project, company, or industry. If you can provide more context about where you encountered this number, I might be able to help you find relevant information.
  • Part of a product name or model number: Some companies might use numbers in their product names. If you can recall any related keywords or the industry this product might belong to, we can try searching for it.
  • A misremembered or incomplete piece of information: It’s also possible that the number is slightly different or that there’s additional information that would help identify the technology.

However, since you’re interested in sustainable technology, I can offer some general information and resources:

  • Explore key areas: Sustainable technology covers various fields like renewable energy, energy efficiency, waste management, sustainable agriculture, and green building. You can explore these areas to learn more about specific technologies and their applications.
  • Look for industry leaders: Many companies are actively involved in developing and implementing sustainable technologies. Researching these companies and their products can give you insights into the latest advancements.
  • Check out research institutions and organizations: Universities and research institutions often conduct cutting-edge research in sustainable technology. Organizations like the United Nations and various environmental groups also provide valuable information and resources.
  • Stay updated: Sustainable technology is a rapidly evolving field. Following industry news, attending conferences, and reading publications can help you stay informed about the latest developments.

If you can recall any additional details about the “3450” reference, feel free to share, and I’ll do my best to assist you further.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3450 ?

It seems we’re still facing a bit of a mystery with the “3450” reference. Without more context, it’s difficult to pinpoint exactly who might be required to use this specific technology.

However, let’s shift our focus to who generally benefits from and is involved in sustainable technology:

Everyone has a role to play in sustainable technology! This includes:

  • Individuals: We can make sustainable choices in our daily lives by conserving energy, reducing waste, and supporting eco-friendly products and services.
  • Businesses: Companies across all sectors can adopt sustainable practices, invest in green technologies, and prioritize environmental and social responsibility.
  • Governments: Policymakers can create regulations and incentives to promote sustainable technology adoption and drive systemic change.
  • Researchers and Innovators: Scientists, engineers, and entrepreneurs are crucial for developing new sustainable technologies and finding innovative solutions to environmental challenges.
  • Communities: Local communities can implement sustainable initiatives, raise awareness, and work together to create a more sustainable future.

Here’s how different groups might be involved in sustainable technology:

  • Consumers: Choosing energy-efficient appliances, using public transportation, recycling, and reducing consumption.
  • Manufacturers: Designing and producing products with minimal environmental impact, using sustainable materials, and implementing closed-loop systems.
  • Energy providers: Investing in renewable energy sources, improving grid efficiency, and promoting energy conservation.
  • Farmers: Adopting sustainable agriculture practices, reducing water usage, and minimizing the use of pesticides.
  • Builders and architects: Designing and constructing green buildings that are energy-efficient and use sustainable materials.

Regardless of the specific “3450” reference, it’s clear that sustainable technology is essential for everyone. By working together and embracing sustainable practices, we can create a healthier planet and a more sustainable future for all.

If you happen to come across any additional information about the “3450” reference, please feel free to share it, and I’ll do my best to help you understand its connection to sustainable technology.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3450 ?

While we’re still unsure about the specific “3450” technology, we can definitely talk about when sustainable technology, in general, is required. The answer is: Now, more than ever!

Here’s why sustainable technology is urgently needed:

  • Climate Change: We are facing a global climate crisis with rising temperatures, extreme weather events, and sea-level rise. Sustainable technologies are crucial for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and mitigating the impacts of climate change.
  • Resource Depletion: Our planet’s resources are finite. Sustainable technologies help us use resources more efficiently, reduce waste, and promote circular economy models.
  • Environmental Pollution: Pollution from various sources is harming our ecosystems and human health. Sustainable technologies offer solutions for reducing pollution and cleaning up contaminated environments.
  • Growing Population: The world’s population is increasing, and we need to find sustainable ways to provide food, water, energy, and other essential resources for everyone.
  • Economic Development: Sustainable technologies can drive economic growth by creating new industries, jobs, and opportunities while minimizing environmental impact.

When should we implement sustainable technology?

  • Immediately: The sooner we adopt sustainable practices and technologies, the better chance we have of addressing the urgent challenges we face.
  • Continuously: Sustainability is not a one-time fix but an ongoing process. We need to constantly innovate and improve our sustainable technologies and practices.
  • Everywhere: Sustainable technology is needed in all sectors, from energy and transportation to agriculture and manufacturing.
  • By everyone: Individuals, businesses, governments, and communities all have a role to play in adopting and promoting sustainable technology.

In conclusion, the need for sustainable technology is urgent and ongoing. It’s not just about the future; it’s about the present. By embracing sustainable solutions, we can create a healthier planet, a more equitable society, and a more sustainable future for all.

If you have any more questions about sustainable technology or if you happen to remember any details about the “3450” reference, feel free to ask! I’m here to help.

COURTESY : RBC

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3450 ?

This is a great question that highlights the broad applicability of sustainable technology! While we’re still in the dark about “3450”, let’s explore where sustainable technology, in general, is essential:

Everywhere! Sustainable technology isn’t limited to specific locations; it’s needed globally to address the interconnected challenges of climate change, resource depletion, and environmental degradation.

Here are some key areas where sustainable technology is crucial:

  • Urban Areas: Cities are centers of population and consumption, making them critical for sustainable solutions. This includes green buildings, efficient public transportation, renewable energy integration, and waste management systems.
  • Rural Areas: Sustainable agriculture, renewable energy for off-grid communities, and water conservation technologies are essential for rural development and environmental protection.
  • Industrial Sectors: Manufacturing, energy production, and other industries need sustainable technologies to reduce emissions, improve resource efficiency, and minimize waste.
  • Transportation: Sustainable transportation solutions like electric vehicles, improved public transit, and alternative fuels are necessary to reduce emissions and dependence on fossil fuels.
  • Agriculture: Sustainable farming practices, precision agriculture, and water-efficient irrigation are crucial for food security and minimizing environmental impact.
  • Homes and Buildings: Energy-efficient appliances, smart home technologies, and green building materials can significantly reduce energy consumption and environmental footprint.

Here’s a global perspective:

  • Developed Countries: These nations have a responsibility to lead in developing and implementing sustainable technologies, while also supporting developing countries in their sustainability efforts.
  • Developing Countries: Sustainable technology can help these nations achieve economic development while minimizing environmental impact and improving quality of life.
  • Global Collaboration: International cooperation is essential for sharing knowledge, technology, and resources to address global sustainability challenges.

In essence, sustainable technology is needed wherever human activities impact the environment. This means everywhere from our homes and workplaces to our cities and rural landscapes. By embracing sustainable solutions across all sectors and regions, we can create a more sustainable future for everyone.

If you happen to stumble upon any more clues about the mysterious “3450”, please share them! I’m eager to help you unravel this puzzle.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3450 ?

Let’s address the “how” of sustainable technology, while acknowledging we’re still working around the mystery of “3450”. Since we don’t know what “3450” refers to, I’ll focus on how sustainable technology, in general, is implemented and made effective.

Sustainable technology isn’t just about inventing new gadgets; it’s about a holistic approach involving:

  • Innovation and Research: This is the foundation. Scientists, engineers, and researchers constantly work on developing new sustainable materials, energy sources, processes, and technologies. This includes everything from more efficient solar panels to biodegradable plastics.
  • Policy and Regulation: Governments play a crucial role by creating policies that incentivize sustainable practices and penalize environmentally harmful ones. This can include carbon pricing, renewable energy mandates, and stricter environmental regulations.
  • Market Mechanisms: Creating market demand for sustainable products and services is vital. This can be achieved through consumer education, eco-labeling, and incentives for businesses to adopt sustainable practices. A circular economy, where resources are reused and recycled, is a key aspect.
  • Education and Awareness: Raising public awareness about the importance of sustainability and the benefits of sustainable technologies is essential. This empowers individuals to make informed choices and drives demand for sustainable solutions.
  • Investment and Funding: Significant investment is needed to support research, development, and deployment of sustainable technologies. This includes both public and private funding.
  • Collaboration and Partnerships: Addressing sustainability challenges requires collaboration among governments, businesses, researchers, and communities. Partnerships are crucial for sharing knowledge, resources, and expertise.
  • Implementation and Deployment: Sustainable technologies need to be effectively implemented and scaled up to have a significant impact. This involves infrastructure development, technology transfer, and capacity building.
  • Monitoring and Evaluation: It’s important to track the performance of sustainable technologies and assess their impact on the environment and society. This data can be used to improve existing technologies and inform future development.
  • Behavioral Change: Ultimately, the success of sustainable technology depends on individuals and communities adopting sustainable behaviors. This includes reducing consumption, conserving energy, and making eco-friendly choices.

In short, making sustainable technology a reality requires a multi-faceted approach involving innovation, policy, market forces, education, investment, collaboration, and behavioral change. It’s a complex challenge, but one that is essential for our future.

If you happen to remember any other details about “3450,” even if it seems insignificant, please share it. It might be the clue we need to unlock this puzzle!

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3450 ?

I understand you’re trying to connect “3450” with sustainable technology, perhaps in the context of a case study. However, without any information about what “3450” represents, it’s impossible to create a case study. A case study needs a specific subject.

Let’s illustrate with a hypothetical example. Imagine “3450” refers to a new type of biodegradable packaging material. Then we could create a case study:

Hypothetical Case Study: Biodegradable Packaging Material 3450

Introduction:

This case study examines the development and implementation of “3450,” a novel biodegradable packaging material designed to replace traditional plastic packaging.

Problem:

Traditional plastic packaging poses significant environmental challenges due to its non-biodegradability and contribution to pollution.

Solution:

“3450” was developed as a sustainable alternative. It is made from [hypothetical material, e.g., plant-based starches] and is designed to decompose naturally within [timeframe, e.g., six months] in a composting environment.

Implementation:

[Describe how “3450” was introduced. E.g., Pilot program with a food company, scaling up production, etc.]

Results:

  • [Environmental impact: Reduction in plastic waste, lower carbon footprint, etc.]
  • [Economic impact: Cost of production, market demand, etc.]
  • [Social impact: Consumer acceptance, job creation, etc.]

Challenges:

  • [Technical challenges: Durability, shelf life, etc.]
  • [Economic challenges: Cost competitiveness, etc.]
  • [Logistical challenges: Collection and composting infrastructure, etc.]

Lessons Learned:

[Key takeaways from the implementation of “3450.”]

Conclusion:

[Summary of the case study and future outlook for “3450.”]

Key to making your case study: We need to know what “3450” is. Is it a technology, a process, a material, a project? If you can provide any context, even a guess, we can try to build something.

For example, is it related to:

  • Solar energy?
  • Water purification?
  • Waste management?
  • Sustainable agriculture?
  • Green building?

The more information you can give, the better chance we have of creating a relevant case study.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3450 ?

I understand you’re looking for a white paper on “Sustainable Technology of 3450.” However, as we’ve discussed, the lack of information about what “3450” represents makes it impossible to create a meaningful white paper. A white paper needs a specific topic to explore.

A white paper is a document that provides in-depth information on a specific topic, often to persuade the reader about a particular viewpoint or solution. It typically includes research, data, and analysis to support its claims.

Let’s illustrate what a white paper could look like if we knew what “3450” was. Let’s assume, for the sake of example, that “3450” refers to a new type of bio-based plastic.

Hypothetical White Paper: Bio-Plastic 3450: A Sustainable Alternative to Traditional Plastics

Abstract:

This white paper examines the environmental and economic benefits of Bio-Plastic 3450, a novel bio-based plastic derived from [source material, e.g., corn starch]. It compares 3450 to traditional petroleum-based plastics, highlighting its reduced carbon footprint, biodegradability, and potential to contribute to a circular economy. The paper also addresses challenges related to cost, scalability, and performance, and proposes strategies for wider adoption of this sustainable material.

Introduction:

The global reliance on petroleum-based plastics has created significant environmental challenges, including pollution, resource depletion, and greenhouse gas emissions. Bio-Plastic 3450 offers a promising alternative, addressing these concerns while offering comparable performance characteristics.

Environmental Benefits:

  • Reduced Carbon Footprint: 3450’s production process results in significantly lower greenhouse gas emissions compared to traditional plastics.
  • Biodegradability: 3450 is biodegradable in [specific conditions, e.g., industrial composting facilities], reducing plastic waste accumulation.
  • Renewable Resources: 3450 is made from renewable resources, reducing dependence on fossil fuels.

Economic Benefits:

  • Potential for Job Creation: The development and production of 3450 can create new jobs in the bio-plastics industry.
  • Reduced Waste Management Costs: Biodegradability can reduce the burden on landfills and lower waste management costs.
  • Market Opportunity: Growing consumer demand for sustainable products creates a significant market opportunity for 3450.

Challenges and Opportunities:

  • Cost Competitiveness: Currently, 3450 may be more expensive than traditional plastics. Further research and development are needed to reduce costs.
  • Scalability: Scaling up production to meet market demand is a challenge. Investment in infrastructure and production capacity is crucial.
  • Performance: 3450 needs to meet the performance requirements of various applications. Ongoing research is focused on improving its durability, heat resistance, and other properties.

Conclusion:

Bio-Plastic 3450 offers a compelling sustainable alternative to traditional plastics. While challenges remain, the environmental and economic benefits are significant. With continued research, development, and policy support, 3450 has the potential to play a key role in a more sustainable future.

Call to Action:

[Recommendations for stakeholders, including policymakers, businesses, and consumers, to support the adoption of Bio-Plastic 3450.]

Key takeaway: This is just a hypothetical example. To create a real white paper, we must know what “3450” is. Please provide any information you have, even if you’re unsure if it’s relevant. It could be the missing piece of the puzzle!

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3450 ?

While the specific “3450” remains a mystery, let’s explore the industrial applications of sustainable technology in general. This should give you a good overview of how sustainability is transforming various industries.

Sustainable technology is revolutionizing industries by offering solutions that minimize environmental impact, improve resource efficiency, and promote social responsibility. Here are some key areas:

1. Manufacturing:

  • Sustainable Materials: Replacing traditional materials with bio-based, recycled, or sustainably sourced alternatives. Examples include bioplastics, recycled metals, and sustainable wood.
  • Energy Efficiency: Implementing energy-efficient processes, equipment, and technologies to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Examples include LED lighting, heat recovery systems, and smart manufacturing technologies.
  • Waste Reduction: Minimizing waste generation through process optimization, recycling, and closed-loop systems. Examples include zero-waste manufacturing, industrial symbiosis, and upcycling.
  • Sustainable Supply Chains: Sourcing materials and products from suppliers who adhere to sustainable practices and ethical standards.

2. Energy:

  • Renewable Energy: Shifting from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal.
  • Energy Storage: Developing advanced energy storage technologies to improve the reliability and efficiency of renewable energy systems.
  • Smart Grids: Implementing smart grid technologies to optimize energy distribution and reduce energy waste.
  • Energy Efficiency: Improving energy efficiency in buildings, transportation, and industries to reduce energy demand.

3. Transportation:

  • Electric Vehicles: Transitioning to electric vehicles and developing charging infrastructure to reduce emissions from the transportation sector.
  • Alternative Fuels: Exploring and developing alternative fuels such as biofuels and hydrogen to reduce dependence on fossil fuels.
  • Sustainable Logistics: Optimizing transportation routes and logistics to reduce fuel consumption and emissions.

4. Agriculture:

  • Precision Agriculture: Using technology to optimize resource use in agriculture, such as water, fertilizers, and pesticides.
  • Sustainable Farming Practices: Implementing sustainable farming practices such as crop rotation, conservation tillage, and organic farming.
  • Vertical Farming: Developing vertical farming systems to increase food production in urban areas and reduce the need for land and water.

5. Construction:

  • Green Buildings: Designing and constructing buildings that are energy-efficient, use sustainable materials, and have minimal environmental impact.  
  • Sustainable Materials: Using sustainable building materials such as recycled wood, bamboo, and green concrete.
  • Modular Construction: Adopting modular construction techniques to reduce waste and improve construction efficiency.

6. Information Technology:

  • Green Computing: Reducing the environmental impact of computing through energy-efficient hardware, software, and data centers.
  • Cloud Computing: Utilizing cloud computing to optimize resource utilization and reduce energy consumption.
  • E-waste Management: Implementing responsible e-waste management practices to minimize the environmental impact of electronic waste.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology is being applied in various industries. By embracing sustainable solutions, industries can reduce their environmental footprint, improve resource efficiency, and contribute to a more sustainable future.

If you have any specific industries in mind or if you happen to recall any details about “3450,” please let me know! I’m here to help you explore this further.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3450 ?

You’re right to focus on research and development (R&D) as it’s the engine that drives progress in sustainable technology! While “3450” remains elusive, let’s explore the exciting world of R&D in this crucial field.

R&D in sustainable technology is a dynamic and multifaceted endeavor, pushing the boundaries of science and engineering to create solutions for a more sustainable future. Here are some key areas of focus:

1. Renewable Energy:

  • Next-generation Solar: Research on perovskite solar cells, bifacial solar panels, and solar concentrators to improve efficiency and reduce costs.
  • Advanced Wind Power: Development of taller wind turbines, offshore wind farms, and airborne wind energy systems to harness more wind power.
  • Enhanced Biomass: Research on sustainable biomass conversion technologies, including advanced biofuels and biochemicals.
  • Geothermal Energy: Exploring enhanced geothermal systems and developing new drilling and extraction techniques.

2. Energy Efficiency:

  • Smart Grids: Developing advanced smart grid technologies to optimize energy distribution and integrate renewable energy sources.
  • Energy Storage: Research on advanced battery technologies, pumped hydro storage, and thermal energy storage to improve energy storage capacity and efficiency.
  • Building Technologies: Developing energy-efficient building materials, HVAC systems, and smart building technologies to reduce energy consumption in buildings.

3. Sustainable Materials:

  • Bioplastics: Research on new types of bioplastics derived from renewable resources, with improved biodegradability and performance.
  • Recycled Materials: Developing technologies to improve the quality and recyclability of materials, and creating closed-loop systems for material reuse.
  • Sustainable Composites: Research on composite materials made from sustainable resources, with applications in various industries.

4. Environmental Remediation:

  • Carbon Capture and Storage: Developing technologies to capture carbon dioxide emissions from industrial sources and store them underground.
  • Water Purification: Research on advanced water purification and desalination technologies to ensure access to clean water.
  • Waste Treatment: Developing innovative waste treatment technologies to reduce waste generation and promote resource recovery.

5. Sustainable Agriculture:

  • Precision Agriculture: Research on sensors, data analytics, and automation to optimize resource use in agriculture and improve crop yields.
  • Sustainable Farming Practices: Developing and promoting sustainable farming practices such as crop rotation, conservation tillage, and organic farming.
  • Vertical Farming: Research on vertical farming systems to increase food production in urban areas and reduce the need for land and water.

6. Cross-cutting Areas:

  • Nanotechnology: Applying nanotechnology to develop new sustainable materials, energy technologies, and environmental solutions.
  • Biotechnology: Utilizing biotechnology to develop sustainable biofuels, bioplastics, and other bio-based products.
  • Artificial Intelligence: Applying AI to optimize energy use, improve resource efficiency, and accelerate the development of sustainable technologies.

Key to success in sustainable technology R&D:

  • Collaboration: Partnerships between universities, research institutions, industry, and governments are crucial for accelerating innovation.
  • Funding: Consistent and substantial funding is essential to support long-term research projects and bring sustainable technologies to market.
  • Interdisciplinary Approach: Sustainable technology R&D requires expertise from various disciplines, including science, engineering, economics, and social sciences.

By investing in R&D and fostering collaboration, we can unlock the full potential of sustainable technology and create a more sustainable future for all.

I’m still curious about “3450”! If you have any inklings about its possible connection to sustainable technology, please share them. It might spark some new ideas.

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
  53. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
  77. ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
  96. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
  107. ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »