Sustainable Technology of 3440

79 / 100

Sustainable Technology of 3440 ?

It appears you’re asking about the Rish Master 3440, which is an electrical meter, and how it relates to sustainable technology. Here’s how it fits in:

Energy Efficiency Monitoring: The Rish Master 3440 measures various electrical parameters, including energy consumption. This data is crucial for identifying areas where energy is being wasted and for implementing strategies to improve energy efficiency. By understanding energy usage patterns, businesses can optimize their operations, reduce energy consumption, and lower their carbon footprint.
Harmonic Analysis: The meter can measure Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) and individual harmonics. Harmonics can lead to power losses and equipment malfunction. By monitoring harmonics, potential problems can be identified and addressed, ensuring the efficient and reliable operation of electrical systems.
Data for Sustainability Reporting: The data collected by the Rish Master 3440 can be used for sustainability reporting, helping organizations track their progress towards energy reduction goals and demonstrate their commitment to environmental responsibility.

How this contributes to sustainability:

Reduced Energy Consumption: By providing insights into energy usage, the meter helps organizations identify opportunities to reduce consumption, leading to lower energy costs and a smaller environmental impact.
Improved Grid Stability: Monitoring and controlling harmonics helps maintain the stability of the electrical grid, reducing the risk of power outages and ensuring the reliable delivery of electricity.
Resource Conservation: Efficient use of electricity reduces the need for power generation, conserving natural resources and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

In conclusion, the Rish Master 3440, while an electrical meter, plays a role in sustainable technology by providing the data needed to optimize energy use, improve grid stability, and support sustainability reporting.

What is Sustainable Technology of 3440 ?

You’re asking a great question that gets at the heart of how technology can contribute to a more sustainable world. While the Rish Master 3440 itself isn’t a flashy, “green” technology, it plays a crucial role in enabling sustainability efforts. Here’s how:

1. Energy Efficiency is Key:

Precise Measurement: The Rish Master 3440 is a highly accurate meter that measures a wide range of electrical parameters (voltage, current, power, energy, etc.). This granular data is essential for understanding exactly how electricity is being used within a system.
Identifying Waste: By analyzing the data from the meter, businesses and organizations can pinpoint areas where energy is being wasted. This might be due to inefficient equipment, faulty wiring, or even just unnecessary usage.
Optimization: Once energy waste is identified, steps can be taken to optimize energy consumption. This could involve upgrading equipment, implementing energy-saving practices, or adjusting operational schedules.

2. Harmonics Management for a Healthier Grid:

Understanding Harmonics: The meter can measure and analyze harmonics, which are distortions in the electrical waveform. Harmonics can cause power losses, equipment overheating, and even premature failure.
Mitigation: By monitoring harmonics, potential problems can be identified and addressed. This ensures the efficient and reliable operation of electrical systems, reducing energy waste and extending the lifespan of equipment.

3. Data-Driven Sustainability:

Tracking Progress: The data collected by the Rish Master 3440 can be used to track progress towards energy reduction goals. This allows organizations to measure the effectiveness of their sustainability initiatives and make adjustments as needed.
Reporting and Accountability: The data can also be used for sustainability reporting, demonstrating a commitment to environmental responsibility to stakeholders and the public.

In essence, the Rish Master 3440 empowers users to:

Use energy more efficiently: By providing the information needed to identify and reduce energy waste.
Maintain a stable and reliable electrical system: By monitoring and managing harmonics.
Make informed decisions about energy use: Based on accurate and comprehensive data.

While it may seem like a simple measuring device, the Rish Master 3440 is a valuable tool in the fight for a more sustainable future. By enabling better energy management, it helps organizations reduce their environmental impact and contribute to a greener world.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3440 ?

The Rish Master 3440, with its focus on energy monitoring and harmonics analysis, is valuable for a wide range of users who are concerned with energy efficiency, power quality, and sustainability. Here are some key groups that would benefit from this technology:

1. Industrial Facilities:

Manufacturing Plants: These facilities often have complex electrical systems with high energy demands. The 3440 helps identify energy waste, optimize processes, and reduce operational costs.
Data Centers: Data centers consume vast amounts of energy. The meter helps monitor energy usage, improve power efficiency, and ensure reliable operation.
Large Commercial Buildings: Office buildings, shopping malls, and hotels can use the 3440 to track energy consumption, identify areas for improvement, and reduce their environmental footprint.

2. Utilities and Energy Service Providers:

Energy Companies: Utilities can use the 3440 to monitor grid health, analyze power quality, and identify areas where infrastructure improvements are needed.
Energy Auditors: Professionals who assess energy efficiency can use the meter to gather accurate data and provide recommendations for improvement.

3. Organizations with Sustainability Goals:

Companies with Environmental Targets: Businesses committed to reducing their carbon footprint can use the 3440 to track their progress, measure the impact of their sustainability initiatives, and report on their performance.
Government Agencies: Public sector organizations can use the meter to improve energy efficiency in government buildings and facilities.

4. Anyone Concerned with Energy Efficiency and Cost Savings:

Building Owners and Managers: Whether it’s a residential building or a commercial complex, the 3440 can help optimize energy use and reduce utility bills.
Homeowners: While the 3440 might be more advanced than what most homeowners need, the underlying principles of energy monitoring and efficiency apply to everyone.

In summary, the Rish Master 3440 is a valuable tool for anyone who wants to:

Gain a deeper understanding of their energy consumption.
Identify opportunities to reduce energy waste and costs.
Improve the reliability and efficiency of their electrical systems.
Contribute to a more sustainable future.

By providing accurate and detailed data on energy usage and power quality, the 3440 empowers users to make informed decisions and take action to improve their energy performance.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3440 ?

You’re asking a great question that gets to the timing of when the Rish Master 3440, or similar energy monitoring technology, becomes essential. Here’s a breakdown of situations where it’s particularly important:

1. When Energy Costs are Significant:

High Energy Bills: If your facility or business is experiencing high energy costs, it’s a clear indicator that there’s room for improvement. The 3440 can help pinpoint the areas where energy is being wasted, allowing you to take targeted action to reduce consumption and lower your bills.
Cost Reduction Initiatives: When organizations set goals to reduce operational costs, energy efficiency is often a prime target. The 3440 provides the data needed to track energy usage, measure the effectiveness of cost-saving measures, and demonstrate progress towards those goals.

2. When Power Quality Issues Arise:

Equipment Malfunction: If you’re experiencing frequent equipment malfunctions, overheating, or premature failure, it could be due to power quality problems like harmonics. The 3440 can analyze harmonics and other power quality parameters, helping you identify and address the root cause of these issues.
Grid Instability: In situations where the electrical grid is unstable or prone to fluctuations, the 3440 can help monitor power quality and ensure that your equipment is protected. This is particularly important for sensitive equipment in industries like manufacturing or data centers.

3. When Sustainability is a Priority:

Environmental Goals: Organizations with environmental targets or sustainability initiatives need to track their energy consumption and reduce their carbon footprint. The 3440 provides the data needed to measure progress, identify areas for improvement, and demonstrate commitment to sustainability.
Regulatory Compliance: In some regions, there may be regulations or reporting requirements related to energy consumption or emissions. The 3440 can help organizations gather the necessary data to comply with these regulations.

4. When Optimizing Operations is Key:

Process Improvement: In industrial settings, energy consumption is often closely tied to operational efficiency. The 3440 can help identify areas where energy is being wasted due to inefficient processes or equipment, allowing for optimization and improved productivity.
Predictive Maintenance: By monitoring electrical parameters, the 3440 can help identify potential problems before they lead to equipment failure. This enables proactive maintenance, reducing downtime and extending the lifespan of equipment.

In general, the Rish Master 3440 is most valuable when:

Energy efficiency is a concern.
Power quality is critical.
Sustainability is a priority.
Data-driven decision-making is essential.

By providing accurate and detailed insights into energy usage and power quality, the 3440 empowers users to take control of their energy consumption, improve operational efficiency, and contribute to a more sustainable future.

courtesy : Tech Evaluate

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3440 ?

You’re right to think about where this technology is most useful! The Rish Master 3440, with its focus on energy monitoring and harmonics analysis, finds application in a variety of settings where energy efficiency, power quality, and sustainability are crucial. Here are some key places where it’s needed:

1. Industrial Environments:

Factories and Manufacturing Plants: These facilities typically have complex electrical systems with high energy demands. The 3440 helps identify energy waste, optimize processes, and reduce operational costs.
Data Centers: Data centers consume vast amounts of energy. The meter helps monitor energy usage, improve power efficiency, and ensure reliable operation.
Oil and Gas Platforms: These remote locations require reliable power and efficient energy use. The 3440 helps monitor energy consumption and optimize operations.

2. Commercial Buildings:

Office Buildings: Large office buildings can use the 3440 to track energy consumption, identify areas for improvement, and reduce their environmental footprint.
Shopping Malls and Retail Spaces: These spaces often have high energy demands for lighting, HVAC, and other systems. The meter helps optimize energy use and reduce costs.
Hospitals and Healthcare Facilities: These facilities require reliable power and efficient energy use for critical equipment and operations. The 3440 helps ensure power quality and optimize energy consumption.

3. Infrastructure and Utilities:

Power Plants: Power plants can use the 3440 to monitor the efficiency of their operations and identify areas for improvement.
Electrical Grids: Utilities can use the 3440 to monitor grid health, analyze power quality, and identify areas where infrastructure improvements are needed.
Renewable Energy Installations: Solar and wind farms can use the 3440 to monitor energy production and optimize performance.

4. Transportation:

Electric Vehicle Charging Stations: The 3440 can be used to monitor energy consumption at charging stations and ensure accurate billing.
Public Transportation Systems: Trains and other electric transportation systems can use the 3440 to monitor energy usage and improve efficiency.

5. Research and Development:

Laboratories and Research Facilities: These facilities often have sensitive equipment that requires stable power. The 3440 helps ensure power quality and monitor energy consumption.

In essence, the Rish Master 3440 is valuable in any setting where:

Energy costs are a significant concern.
Power quality is critical for equipment operation.
Sustainability and environmental impact are priorities.
Data-driven decision-making is essential for optimizing performance.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3440 ?

It seems you’re interested in how the Rish Master 3440 contributes to sustainability. It’s not a “sustainable technology” in itself, like solar panels, but it’s a crucial tool for achieving sustainability in various settings. Here’s how it’s required:

1. Energy Efficiency:

Measurement and Monitoring: The 3440 precisely measures various electrical parameters (voltage, current, power, energy, etc.). This data is the foundation for understanding exactly how electricity is being used. Without this detailed information, it’s impossible to identify areas of waste or inefficiency.
Identifying Opportunities: By analyzing the data, users can pinpoint where energy is being lost. This might be due to inefficient equipment, faulty wiring, or even just unnecessary usage patterns.
Optimization: Once waste is identified, the 3440 helps track the impact of changes made to improve efficiency. This could involve upgrading equipment, adjusting operational schedules, or implementing energy-saving practices.

2. Power Quality:

Harmonics Analysis: The meter measures and analyzes harmonics, which are distortions in the electrical waveform that can lead to power losses, equipment overheating, and premature failure.
Mitigation: By monitoring harmonics, potential problems can be identified and addressed, ensuring the efficient and reliable operation of electrical systems. This reduces energy waste and extends the lifespan of equipment.

3. Data-Driven Sustainability:

Tracking Progress: The data collected by the 3440 can be used to track progress towards energy reduction goals and other sustainability targets. This allows organizations to measure the effectiveness of their initiatives and make adjustments as needed.
Reporting and Accountability: The data can also be used for sustainability reporting, demonstrating a commitment to environmental responsibility to stakeholders and the public.

In essence, the Rish Master 3440 is required because it:

Provides the necessary data to understand and optimize energy consumption.
Helps maintain a healthy and efficient electrical system.
Enables data-driven decision-making for sustainability initiatives.

While it might seem like a simple measuring device, the 3440 is a valuable tool for any organization serious about improving its energy performance and contributing to a more sustainable future.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3440 ?

While I couldn’t find a specific case study detailing the use of the Rish Master 3440, I can provide you with a hypothetical example based on its capabilities and common applications. This will illustrate how it contributes to sustainability in a real-world scenario.

Case Study: Optimizing Energy Efficiency in a Manufacturing Plant

Background:

A medium-sized manufacturing plant producing automotive parts was experiencing high energy costs and wanted to reduce its environmental impact. The plant’s electrical system was complex, with a mix of older and newer equipment, making it difficult to pinpoint areas of energy waste.

Solution:

The plant installed Rish Master 3440 meters at key points in its electrical distribution system to monitor energy consumption and power quality. The meters provided detailed data on various parameters, including:

Energy consumption (kWh): Tracked energy usage for different production areas and equipment.
Current and voltage: Monitored for imbalances and potential issues.
Power factor: Measured the efficiency of electricity use.
Harmonics: Analyzed distortions in the electrical waveform.

Results:

By analyzing the data from the 3440 meters, the plant was able to:

Identify energy waste: The data revealed that older machines in one production area were consuming significantly more energy than newer models.
Optimize equipment usage: The plant adjusted production schedules to minimize the use of energy-intensive equipment during peak demand periods.
Improve power factor: By addressing issues with low power factor, the plant reduced energy losses in the electrical system.
Reduce harmonics: Monitoring and mitigating harmonics helped improve the efficiency and lifespan of electrical equipment.

Outcomes:

Reduced energy consumption: The plant achieved a 15% reduction in overall energy consumption, leading to significant cost savings.
Lower carbon footprint: By reducing energy use, the plant decreased its greenhouse gas emissions and environmental impact.
Improved operational efficiency: Optimizing equipment usage and improving power quality led to smoother operations and reduced downtime.
Enhanced sustainability reporting: The data from the 3440 meters provided accurate and reliable information for sustainability reporting, demonstrating the plant’s commitment to environmental responsibility.

Conclusion:

This hypothetical case study illustrates how the Rish Master 3440 can be a valuable tool for organizations seeking to improve energy efficiency and achieve sustainability goals. By providing detailed insights into energy consumption and power quality, the 3440 empowers users to identify areas for improvement, optimize operations, and reduce their environmental footprint.

Remember that this is a simplified example. In real-world scenarios, the specific findings and outcomes may vary depending on the context and the actions taken based on the data. However, the underlying principle remains the same: the Rish Master 3440 provides the information needed to make informed decisions and take effective steps towards a more sustainable future.

courtesy : Accenture

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3440 ?

I can’t provide a formal, published white paper on the Rish Master 3440 and sustainability because I don’t have access to Rishabh Instruments’ internal documentation or the ability to conduct original research. White papers are typically produced by manufacturers or research institutions.

However, I can give you the outline and key content points that a white paper on this topic would likely cover, which you could then use as a starting point for further research or discussions with Rishabh Instruments directly.

Title: Enabling Sustainability through Intelligent Energy Monitoring: The Role of the Rish Master 3440

Abstract: Briefly explain the increasing importance of energy efficiency and sustainability, introduce the Rish Master 3440 as a key tool for achieving these goals, and highlight its core functionalities and benefits.

1. Introduction:

The global push for sustainability and the role of energy efficiency.
The challenges of managing energy consumption in complex systems.
How accurate energy monitoring is crucial for identifying waste and optimization opportunities.
Introduce the Rish Master 3440 as a solution.

2. The Rish Master 3440: Features and Capabilities:

Detail the meter’s technical specifications: parameters measured (voltage, current, power, energy, harmonics, etc.), accuracy, communication protocols, data logging capabilities, etc.
Emphasize the importance of these features for effective energy management.
Include diagrams or images of the device and its interface.

3. How the 3440 Contributes to Sustainability:

Energy Efficiency Optimization: Explain how the meter’s data helps identify areas of energy waste, optimize equipment usage, and improve overall energy efficiency. Give specific examples (e.g., identifying high consumption during off-peak hours, pinpointing inefficient equipment).
Power Quality Improvement: Discuss the impact of harmonics on energy waste and equipment lifespan, and how the 3440’s harmonic analysis capabilities help mitigate these issues.
Data-Driven Decision Making: Explain how the meter’s data empowers users to make informed decisions about energy management strategies and track the effectiveness of their initiatives.
Sustainability Reporting: Highlight how the data can be used for accurate and credible sustainability reporting, demonstrating an organization’s commitment to environmental responsibility.

4. Case Studies (Hypothetical or Real):

Include examples of how the 3440 has been used (or could be used) in different settings (industrial, commercial, etc.) to achieve energy savings and improve sustainability performance. Quantify the results whenever possible (e.g., percentage reduction in energy consumption, cost savings, etc.). Even a hypothetical case study like the one I provided earlier would fit here.

5. Conclusion:

Reiterate the importance of energy monitoring for sustainability.
Summarize the key benefits of the Rish Master 3440.
Position the 3440 as a valuable tool for organizations striving to achieve their sustainability goals.

6. Call to Action:

Encourage readers to contact Rishabh Instruments for more information or to request a demo.

Remember to contact Rishabh Instruments directly for official documentation and any specific case studies they might have available. They are the best source for accurate and detailed information about their products.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3440 ?

You’re interested in how the Rish Master 3440 gets used in the real world! Here are some key industrial applications where its features are particularly valuable for sustainability efforts:

1. Manufacturing Plants:

Energy Efficiency in Production Lines: Manufacturing facilities often have complex production lines with various machines and processes. The 3440 can be installed at different stages of the production line to monitor energy consumption and identify energy-intensive processes or equipment. This data can be used to optimize production schedules, upgrade equipment, or implement energy-saving practices.
Predictive Maintenance: By monitoring electrical parameters like current and voltage, the 3440 can help identify potential issues with equipment before they lead to failure. This enables proactive maintenance, reducing downtime and extending the lifespan of equipment, which contributes to resource conservation and reduces waste.
Power Quality Monitoring: Harmonics and other power quality issues can be prevalent in industrial environments. The 3440’s harmonic analysis capabilities help identify and mitigate these issues, improving the efficiency and reliability of electrical systems and reducing energy losses.

2. Data Centers:

Optimizing Energy Usage: Data centers are known for their high energy consumption. The 3440 helps monitor energy usage at different levels, from individual servers to the overall facility. This data can be used to optimize cooling systems, improve server utilization, and implement energy-saving measures.
Ensuring Power Reliability: Data centers require a stable and reliable power supply. The 3440 helps monitor power quality and identify potential issues that could lead to downtime or equipment damage. This ensures the continuous operation of critical systems and prevents data loss.

3. Oil and Gas Platforms:

Remote Energy Monitoring: Oil and gas platforms, often located in remote areas, require reliable power and efficient energy use. The 3440 can be used to monitor energy consumption remotely, allowing operators to optimize energy usage and reduce operational costs.
Power Quality in Harsh Environments: These platforms operate in harsh environments where power quality can be a challenge. The 3440 helps monitor power quality and ensure the reliable operation of critical equipment in these demanding conditions.

4. Other Industries:

Wastewater Treatment Plants: These facilities can use the 3440 to monitor energy consumption in pumps, motors, and other equipment, optimizing energy use and reducing operational costs.
Mining Operations: Mining operations, which often involve heavy machinery and remote locations, can benefit from the 3440’s energy monitoring and power quality analysis capabilities.

In all these industrial applications, the Rish Master 3440 plays a crucial role by:

Providing accurate and detailed data on energy consumption and power quality.
Enabling data-driven decision-making for energy efficiency and sustainability initiatives.
Improving the reliability and efficiency of electrical systems.
Contributing to cost savings and environmental protection.

By providing these benefits, the Rish Master 3440 helps industrial facilities operate more sustainably and responsibly.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3440 ?

You’re thinking about the future of this technology, which is a great question! While the Rish Master 3440 is already a useful tool, there’s always room for improvement and innovation. Here are some potential areas for research and development related to its sustainable technology applications:

1. Enhanced Data Analytics and AI Integration:

Predictive Analytics: Integrating AI and machine learning algorithms could enable the 3440 to not just monitor energy usage but also predict future consumption patterns. This could help organizations proactively optimize their energy usage and prevent potential issues.
Automated Energy Efficiency Recommendations: The meter could be developed to provide automated recommendations for energy-saving measures based on the data it collects. This could simplify energy management and make it easier for organizations to implement efficiency improvements.
Fault Detection and Diagnostics: AI algorithms could be used to analyze electrical parameters and detect anomalies that indicate potential equipment faults or power quality issues. This could enable predictive maintenance and prevent costly downtime.

2. Improved Communication and Integration:

Wireless Connectivity: Integrating wireless communication technologies like Wi-Fi or cellular connectivity could make it easier to deploy and manage the 3440 in various locations. This would also enable remote monitoring and data access.
Integration with Building Management Systems (BMS): Seamless integration with BMS could allow for centralized control and optimization of energy usage in buildings. This would enable automated adjustments to lighting, HVAC, and other systems based on real-time energy data.
Cloud-Based Platform: Developing a cloud-based platform for data storage and analysis could provide users with access to their energy data from anywhere, along with advanced visualization and reporting tools.

3. Advanced Measurement Capabilities:

More Granular Data: Research could focus on developing sensors and algorithms that provide more granular data on energy consumption at the individual device or component level. This would enable more precise identification of energy waste and optimization opportunities.
Integration with IoT Sensors: Integrating the 3440 with other IoT sensors, such as temperature, humidity, and occupancy sensors, could provide a more holistic view of energy usage in buildings and industrial facilities. This data could be used to develop more sophisticated energy management strategies.
Cybersecurity: As the 3440 and similar devices become more connected, cybersecurity becomes increasingly important. Research and development efforts should focus on ensuring the security of these devices and the data they collect.

4. Focus on User Experience:

Intuitive Interface: Developing a more user-friendly interface for the 3440 and its associated software could make it easier for users to access and understand their energy data.
Customizable Dashboards: Allowing users to create customizable dashboards with the key metrics and visualizations that are most relevant to their needs could improve the usability of the system.

By focusing on these areas of research and development, the Rish Master 3440 and similar technologies can become even more powerful tools for achieving energy efficiency and sustainability goals in various industries and settings.

courtesy : Carnegie India

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.