Sustainable Technology of 3000

Sustainable Technology of 3000 ?

While it’s impossible to predict the future with certainty, here are some potential sustainable technologies that might exist in the year 3000, based on current trends and advancements:

Advanced Energy Systems:

Fusion Power: Safe, clean, and virtually limitless energy production.
Space-Based Solar Power: Capturing solar energy in space and beaming it to Earth.
Enhanced Geothermal: Tapping into deeper and hotter geothermal sources.
Smart Grids: Highly efficient and adaptive energy distribution networks.

Resource Management:

Closed-Loop Recycling: Complete material recovery and reuse, eliminating waste.
Advanced Water Purification: Highly efficient and accessible water treatment systems.
Precision Agriculture: AI-powered farming for optimized resource use and minimal environmental impact.
Vertical Farming: Urban-based, high-yield food production with minimal land and water use.

Environmental Remediation:

Carbon Capture and Storage: Removing CO2 from the atmosphere and safely storing it.
Ocean Cleanup Technologies: Advanced methods for removing plastics and pollutants from oceans.
Reforestation and Ecosystem Restoration: Large-scale efforts to restore natural habitats and biodiversity.
Geoengineering: Techniques to deliberately alter the Earth’s climate system (with careful consideration of potential risks).

Sustainable Transportation:

Hyperloop: High-speed, energy-efficient ground transportation.
Electric and Autonomous Vehicles: Widespread adoption of clean and efficient transportation.
Flying Cars: Personal air mobility with electric or other sustainable propulsion.
Space Travel: More accessible and sustainable space tourism and exploration.

Smart Cities and Infrastructure:

Self-Healing Materials: Infrastructure that can automatically repair itself.
Smart Buildings: Energy-efficient and adaptive structures with integrated systems.
Underground Cities: Sustainable and resilient urban living spaces.
3D-Printed Housing: On-demand, eco-friendly construction using local materials.

Biotechnology and Materials Science:

Bioplastics: Biodegradable and renewable alternatives to traditional plastics.
Lab-Grown Meat: Sustainable and ethical food production.
Advanced Biomaterials: Materials with unique properties inspired by nature.
Genetic Engineering: Potential for developing crops with enhanced sustainability traits.

Artificial Intelligence and Automation:

AI-Powered Optimization: Using AI to improve efficiency and reduce waste in various sectors.
Robotics and Automation: Automating tasks for increased productivity and reduced environmental impact.
Smart Homes and Appliances: Energy-efficient and resource-saving devices.
Virtual Reality and Telepresence: Reducing the need for physical travel and resource consumption.

Remember that these are just potential scenarios, and the actual technologies that exist in 3000 could be very different. However, the pursuit of sustainability will likely be a driving force behind technological development in the centuries to come.Sources and related content

What is Sustainable Technology of 3000 ?

It’s exciting to imagine what sustainable technology might look like in 3000! Here are some ideas based on current trends and potential advancements:

1. Energy:

Fusion Power: A clean, safe, and virtually limitless energy source could be perfected, powering entire civilizations.
Space-Based Solar Power: Massive solar arrays in orbit could capture sunlight without atmospheric interference, beaming energy back to Earth.
Advanced Geothermal: We might be able to tap into incredibly deep and hot geothermal sources, providing consistent and reliable energy.
Smart Grids: Energy distribution networks could be incredibly efficient and adaptive, minimizing waste and optimizing energy use in real-time.

2. Resource Management:

Closed-Loop Recycling: Complete material recovery and reuse could become the norm, eliminating waste and the need for new resource extraction.
Advanced Water Purification: Highly efficient and accessible water treatment systems could provide clean water for everyone, even in the most arid regions.
Precision Agriculture: AI-powered farming could optimize resource use, minimizing environmental impact and maximizing food production.
Vertical Farming: Urban-based, high-yield food production in vertical farms could reduce the need for vast agricultural lands.

3. Environmental Remediation:

Carbon Capture and Storage: Advanced technologies could remove CO2 from the atmosphere and safely store it, reversing climate change.
Ocean Cleanup Technologies: Autonomous systems could efficiently remove plastics and other pollutants from our oceans.
Ecosystem Restoration: Large-scale efforts to restore forests, coral reefs, and other ecosystems could revitalize biodiversity.
Geoengineering: Techniques to carefully manage the Earth’s climate system might be developed, but used cautiously due to potential risks.

4. Transportation:

Hyperloop: High-speed, energy-efficient ground transportation systems could connect cities and regions.
Electric and Autonomous Vehicles: Widespread adoption of clean and efficient transportation could revolutionize personal mobility.
Flying Cars: Personal air mobility with electric or other sustainable propulsion could become a reality.
Space Travel: More accessible and sustainable space tourism and exploration could open new frontiers.

5. Smart Cities and Infrastructure:

Self-Healing Materials: Infrastructure that can automatically repair itself could reduce maintenance costs and improve longevity.
Smart Buildings: Energy-efficient and adaptive structures with integrated systems could optimize resource use.
Underground Cities: Sustainable and resilient urban living spaces could be built underground, minimizing environmental impact.
3D-Printed Housing: On-demand, eco-friendly construction using local materials could revolutionize housing.

6. Biotechnology and Materials Science:

Bioplastics: Biodegradable and renewable alternatives to traditional plastics could eliminate plastic waste.
Lab-Grown Meat: Sustainable and ethical food production could reduce the environmental impact of animal agriculture.
Advanced Biomaterials: Materials with unique properties inspired by nature could revolutionize various industries.
Genetic Engineering: Crops with enhanced sustainability traits could be developed, reducing the need for pesticides and fertilizers.

7. Artificial Intelligence and Automation:

AI-Powered Optimization: AI could be used to improve efficiency and reduce waste in all sectors of the economy.
Robotics and Automation: Automating tasks could increase productivity and reduce environmental impact.
Smart Homes and Appliances: Energy-efficient and resource-saving devices could become commonplace.
Virtual Reality and Telepresence: Reducing the need for physical travel and resource consumption could be achieved through immersive technologies.

It’s important to remember that these are just possibilities, and the actual technologies of 3000 could be very different. However, the pursuit of sustainability will likely be a major driving force behind technological development in the centuries to come.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3000 ?

It’s not just about who needs sustainable technology in 3000, but rather who will be using and benefiting from it. Here’s a breakdown:

Humanity as a whole: The primary beneficiary will be humankind. Sustainable technologies will be crucial for ensuring the long-term survival and well-being of our species. This includes access to clean energy, resources, and a healthy environment.
Future generations: Those living in 3000 and beyond will inherit the consequences of our actions today. Sustainable technologies will be essential for them to thrive and continue our legacy.
The planet itself: Sustainable technologies will help protect and restore Earth’s ecosystems, preserve biodiversity, and mitigate the effects of climate change. This benefits all living things, not just humans.
Civilizations across the galaxy: If humanity expands beyond Earth by 3000, sustainable technologies will be crucial for establishing and maintaining off-world settlements. This will require innovative solutions for energy production, resource management, and life support.
Potentially, other intelligent life: If we encounter other intelligent species, sustainable technologies could play a role in peaceful coexistence and resource sharing.

It’s important to remember that sustainable technology is not just about solving environmental problems. It’s about creating a world where everyone has access to the resources they need to live a good life, without compromising the ability of future generations to do the same.

In 3000, sustainable technology will likely be deeply integrated into every aspect of life, from the way we power our homes to the way we grow our food. It will be a fundamental part of how we interact with the planet and with each other.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3000 ?

This is a fascinating question! It’s not just about when sustainable technology will be needed in 3000, but rather understanding that the need is continuous and ongoing, starting now.

Here’s why:

The seeds of 3000 are sown today: The choices we make now, the technologies we develop and implement today, will shape the world of 3000. If we don’t prioritize sustainability now, we risk creating a future where it’s too late to reverse the damage.
Sustainability is a journey, not a destination: It’s not about reaching a point in 3000 where everything is perfectly sustainable. It’s about constantly striving to improve, innovate, and find better ways to live in harmony with our planet.
Urgent challenges demand immediate action: Climate change, resource depletion, pollution – these are not problems that can be postponed. We need sustainable solutions now to address these challenges and create a viable future.

So, when is sustainable technology required?

Now: To mitigate climate change, protect biodiversity, and ensure access to resources for everyone.
In the near future: To develop and implement clean energy sources, improve resource management, and create sustainable infrastructure.
In the long term: To ensure the survival and well-being of future generations, both on Earth and potentially beyond.

Sustainable technology is not just a futuristic concept; it’s a necessity for our present and our future. The work we do today to advance sustainability will determine the kind of world that exists in 3000 and beyond.

COURTESY : Trending Tech

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3000 ?

Sustainable technology in 3000 (and, importantly, now as we build towards that future) will be required everywhere. It won’t be confined to specific locations, but rather integrated into all aspects of life and civilization. Here’s a breakdown of “where” sustainable tech will be essential:

Globally: Climate change, resource depletion, and pollution are global issues that require global solutions. International cooperation and the widespread adoption of sustainable technologies across all nations will be crucial.
In cities: Urban centers are hubs of consumption and waste generation. Sustainable technologies will be essential for creating eco-friendly cities with efficient transportation, renewable energy, and smart infrastructure. Think vertical farms, self-healing roads, and buildings that generate their own power.
In rural areas: Sustainable agriculture, water management, and access to clean energy are vital for rural communities. Sustainable technologies can empower these communities to thrive while preserving natural resources.
In homes: Smart homes with energy-efficient appliances, water conservation systems, and personalized recycling programs will be essential for reducing our individual environmental footprint.
In transportation: Sustainable transportation systems, including electric vehicles, hyperloops, and potentially even personal air mobility, will be needed to reduce emissions and improve air quality.
In industries: Sustainable manufacturing processes, closed-loop recycling systems, and the use of renewable energy will be essential for minimizing the environmental impact of industrial activities.
In space (if humanity expands): If we establish settlements beyond Earth, sustainable technologies will be even more critical. We’ll need to develop closed-loop life support systems, extract resources sustainably from other planets, and find ways to travel efficiently through space.
In the oceans: Sustainable fishing practices, ocean cleanup technologies, and the development of renewable energy sources from the ocean will be crucial for protecting marine ecosystems.
Underground (potentially): If we explore underground living as a way to reduce our impact on the surface, sustainable technologies will be needed to create habitable and self-sufficient underground environments.

Essentially, the need for sustainable technology in 3000 will be universal, touching every corner of the planet and potentially even beyond. It will be woven into the fabric of daily life, ensuring a healthy and thriving future for all.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3000 ?

That’s a great question that gets to the heart of how sustainable technology will function in 3000! It won’t just be about having the technology, but how it’s integrated and used. Here’s how sustainable technology will likely be required in 3000:

1. Seamless Integration:

Embedded in infrastructure: Sustainable technologies won’t be add-ons, but fundamental parts of buildings, transportation systems, and even our homes. Imagine roads that generate energy as cars drive on them, or buildings with walls that absorb and filter air pollution.
Connected and intelligent: AI and the Internet of Things (IoT) will likely play a huge role, connecting devices and systems to optimize resource use in real-time. Think of a smart grid that automatically adjusts energy distribution based on demand, or appliances that know when to run to minimize energy consumption.

2. Circularity and Efficiency:

Closed-loop systems: The concept of “waste” will be minimized, with resources being constantly reused and recycled. Imagine materials that can be easily broken down and repurposed, or manufacturing processes that generate zero waste.
Renewable energy dominance: Fusion power, space-based solar, or advanced geothermal could be primary energy sources, powering civilization cleanly and efficiently.
Resource optimization: Precision agriculture, vertical farming, and advanced water purification will ensure we use resources wisely, minimizing waste and environmental impact.

3. Adaptability and Resilience:

Self-healing and adaptive systems: Infrastructure that can repair itself, and buildings that can adjust to changing weather conditions, will be crucial for resilience in a potentially more volatile climate.
Localized production: 3D printing and other advanced manufacturing technologies could enable on-demand production of goods using local materials, reducing reliance on global supply chains and transportation.

4. Human-Centered Design:

Empowering individuals: Sustainable technologies will likely be designed to empower individuals to make sustainable choices in their daily lives. Think of apps that track your environmental footprint and provide personalized recommendations for reducing it.
Ethical considerations: As technologies like AI and genetic engineering advance, ethical considerations will be paramount. Ensuring these technologies are used responsibly and for the benefit of all will be crucial.

5. Continuous Innovation:

Ongoing research and development: The pursuit of sustainability will require continuous innovation and improvement. We’ll need to constantly find new and better ways to live in harmony with our planet.

In essence, sustainable technology in 3000 will be about creating a world where technology works seamlessly with nature to support a thriving and equitable society. It will be a world where sustainability is not just a goal, but a way of life.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3000 ?

It’s challenging to provide a specific “case study” of sustainable technology in 3000, as it’s a hypothetical future. However, we can create a scenario that illustrates how sustainable technologies might be integrated into daily life in that era.

Scenario: The City of Aurora, 3000 AD

Aurora is a bustling metropolis, but unlike cities of the past, it exists in harmony with nature. Here’s a glimpse into its sustainable infrastructure:

Energy: Aurora is powered by a combination of fusion energy and space-based solar power. Clean energy is abundant and readily available. Smart grids optimize energy distribution, minimizing waste and ensuring a stable supply.
Resources: Aurora operates on a circular economy model. Almost all materials are recycled and reused in closed-loop systems. Advanced 3D printing technology allows citizens to create personalized goods on demand, using recycled materials.
Food: Aurora boasts numerous vertical farms and hydroponic gardens. These high-tech facilities produce fresh, nutritious food within the city, reducing reliance on traditional agriculture and long-distance transportation.
Transportation: Aurora’s transportation system is highly efficient and sustainable. Electric and autonomous vehicles are the norm, and a network of hyperloops connects Aurora to other cities. Personal air mobility is also available, with electric “flying cars” that operate quietly and efficiently.
Housing: Aurora’s buildings are self-healing and adaptive. They can repair themselves automatically and adjust to changing weather conditions. Many residents live in eco-friendly underground homes that minimize their environmental impact.
Environment: Aurora is surrounded by lush green spaces and restored ecosystems. Advanced technologies have cleaned up pollution from the past, and ongoing efforts maintain a healthy environment for all living things.

A Day in the Life:

A typical Aurora resident might start their day by using their smart home system to adjust lighting and temperature based on their preferences and energy efficiency. They might then enjoy a breakfast made from locally grown produce in their vertical garden. For their commute, they could choose an autonomous electric vehicle or a personal flying car, both powered by clean energy. At work, they might use virtual reality to collaborate with colleagues from around the world, reducing the need for physical travel. In the evening, they might relax in a park with friends, enjoying the clean air and beautiful surroundings.

Key Takeaways:

This scenario illustrates how sustainable technologies in 3000 might be seamlessly integrated into daily life, creating a world where humans can thrive without compromising the planet’s resources or harming the environment. This future is not just a fantasy; it’s a vision that we can work towards by prioritizing sustainability today.

COURTESY : RBC

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3000 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 3000: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 3000. Building upon current trends and anticipating future breakthroughs, it envisions a world where technology and nature coexist harmoniously, ensuring a thriving future for humanity and the planet. It examines key areas of technological advancement, their potential impact, and the ethical considerations crucial for responsible development.

1. Introduction:

The pursuit of sustainability is a continuous journey, not a destination. While predicting the future with certainty is impossible, extrapolating from current scientific and technological advancements allows us to paint a plausible picture of how sustainable technologies might shape the world of 3000. This paper presents a vision of that future, focusing on key areas and emphasizing the importance of ethical considerations in driving innovation.

2. Energy:

The foundation of any advanced civilization is access to clean and abundant energy. In 3000, several possibilities could be realized:

Fusion Power: The long-sought dream of harnessing fusion energy may finally be a reality, providing a virtually limitless and clean power source.
Space-Based Solar Power: Large-scale solar arrays in orbit could capture solar energy without atmospheric interference, beaming it back to Earth for distribution.
Advanced Geothermal: Tapping into deep and high-temperature geothermal resources could offer consistent and reliable baseload power.
Smart Grids: Highly sophisticated and adaptive energy distribution networks will optimize energy use in real-time, minimizing waste and maximizing efficiency.

3. Resource Management:

Sustainable resource management will be paramount in 3000:

Closed-Loop Recycling: Advanced material science and recycling technologies will enable near-total recovery and reuse of materials, minimizing waste and the need for resource extraction.
Precision Agriculture: AI-powered farming techniques will optimize resource use in agriculture, minimizing water consumption, fertilizer use, and environmental impact.
Vertical Farming: Urban-based vertical farms will provide fresh, locally grown produce, reducing transportation needs and land use.
Advanced Water Purification: Highly efficient and accessible water purification systems will ensure access to clean water for all, even in arid regions.

4. Environmental Remediation:

Reversing the environmental damage of the past will be a major focus:

Carbon Capture and Storage: Advanced technologies will actively remove CO2 from the atmosphere and safely store it, mitigating the effects of climate change.
Ocean Cleanup: Autonomous systems will efficiently remove plastics and other pollutants from the oceans, restoring marine ecosystems.
Ecosystem Restoration: Large-scale efforts to reforest, restore wetlands, and revitalize degraded ecosystems will enhance biodiversity and ecosystem services.

5. Sustainable Living:

Sustainable technologies will be integrated into every aspect of daily life:

Smart Cities: Urban centers will be designed for sustainability, with energy-efficient buildings, smart transportation systems, and integrated green spaces.
Self-Healing Materials: Infrastructure built from self-healing materials will require less maintenance and last longer, reducing resource consumption.
3D-Printed Housing: On-demand, eco-friendly construction using locally sourced and recycled materials will revolutionize housing.

6. Ethical Considerations:

As we develop these advanced technologies, ethical considerations are crucial:

Equitable Access: Ensuring that the benefits of sustainable technologies are shared equitably across all populations is essential.
Environmental Justice: Addressing the disproportionate impact of environmental problems on marginalized communities must be a priority.
Responsible AI: Developing and deploying AI responsibly, with careful consideration of its potential impacts on society and the environment, is crucial.
Biotechnology Ethics: The use of biotechnology, including genetic engineering, must be guided by ethical principles and a deep understanding of potential risks.

7. Conclusion:

The sustainable technologies of 3000 offer a vision of a world where humanity thrives in harmony with nature. Achieving this future requires a commitment to innovation, ethical considerations, and global cooperation. By prioritizing sustainability today, we can lay the foundation for a brighter future for generations to come. The journey towards 3000 is a journey we must begin now.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3000 ?

You’re asking about the practical side of sustainable tech in 3000! Here are some potential industrial applications, keeping in mind this is speculative but based on current trends:

1. Advanced Manufacturing & Resource Management:

Closed-loop Production: Factories of 3000 might operate on near-total resource recovery. Imagine a plant where raw materials are processed, products are made, and then the byproducts and even the products themselves are broken down at the end of their life to become the raw materials for the next cycle.
3D Printing at Scale: Not just for trinkets! Massive 3D printing facilities could construct everything from buildings to vehicles on demand, using recycled or sustainably sourced materials. This allows for localized production, reducing transport needs and waste from overproduction.
AI-driven Optimization: Factories will be managed by sophisticated AI that monitors energy use, material flow, and production processes in real-time, constantly tweaking things to minimize waste and maximize efficiency.

2. Energy-Intensive Industries:

Clean Steel Production: Steelmaking is a major polluter. In 3000, it might be done with hydrogen produced from renewable energy, or even through entirely new processes that don’t rely on fossil fuels.
Sustainable Mining: If we still need to mine, it will be drastically different. Think autonomous mining robots guided by AI, minimizing environmental impact and prioritizing the extraction of critical materials needed for sustainable tech itself.
Energy Storage: Massive, grid-scale energy storage will be essential to balance the intermittent nature of renewables like solar. Advanced battery tech or other novel storage solutions will be crucial for industries that need consistent power.

3. Biotechnology & Materials Science:

Bioplastics & Biomaterials: Factories could be producing a wide array of materials from biological sources – not just plastics, but also strong, lightweight composites for construction or even self-healing materials for industrial equipment.
Lab-grown Everything: Not just meat! Imagine factories producing all sorts of goods, from fabrics to chemicals, using cellular agriculture or other bio-based processes. This reduces the need for traditional agriculture or resource extraction.

4. Environmental Remediation at Industrial Scale:

Carbon Capture & Utilization: Industrial plants might have built-in systems that capture CO2 from their processes and turn it into useful products – fuels, building materials, even food.
Pollution Cleanup: Specialized industries could focus on cleaning up legacy pollution – not just from the air and water, but also contaminated land, using advanced bioremediation or other techniques.

Important Note:

The key here is that sustainability won’t be an afterthought. It will be the foundation of how industries operate. Efficiency, circularity, and minimizing environmental impact will be baked into every process from the design phase onwards. This will likely be driven by both economic necessity (resource scarcity, cost of waste disposal) and societal pressure.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3000 ?

Research and development (R&D) for sustainable technology in 3000 will be a continuous, iterative process, building upon the foundations laid today. Here’s a look at potential areas of focus:

1. Fundamental Science:

Advanced Materials Science: Creating new materials with unprecedented properties – super strength, self-healing capabilities, biodegradability, and even materials that can directly interact with biological systems. Think of programmable matter or materials that can adapt to their environment.
Energy Physics: Exploring new ways to generate and harness energy, potentially beyond fusion and solar. This could involve investigating exotic forms of energy or even tapping into zero-point energy (though that’s still highly theoretical).
Quantum Computing: Quantum computers could revolutionize materials science, allowing us to simulate and design new materials with incredible precision. They could also optimize complex systems like energy grids or transportation networks.
Biotechnology and Synthetic Biology: Engineering biological systems to perform specific tasks, such as producing biofuels, breaking down pollutants, or even creating new forms of life. This requires careful ethical considerations.

2. Applied Research and Engineering:

Closed-Loop Systems: Developing the technologies and infrastructure needed to create truly closed-loop systems for resource management, from recycling to manufacturing. This will require innovations in materials processing, separation technologies, and product design.
Advanced AI and Robotics: Creating AI systems that can design, optimize, and manage complex sustainable systems, from smart grids to vertical farms. Robotics will be crucial for automating tasks in manufacturing, agriculture, and environmental cleanup.
Space-Based Technologies: Researching and developing the technologies needed for large-scale space-based solar power, resource extraction from asteroids, and potentially even interstellar travel.
Geoengineering: Investigating and refining geoengineering techniques for managing the Earth’s climate, but with a strong focus on safety and minimizing unintended consequences. This is a highly controversial area and requires careful consideration.

3. Social and Behavioral Sciences:

Sustainable Consumption: Understanding human behavior and developing strategies to promote sustainable consumption patterns. This could involve behavioral economics, social marketing, and the design of user-friendly sustainable technologies.
Environmental Ethics: Developing a robust ethical framework for guiding the development and use of sustainable technologies, particularly in areas like biotechnology and geoengineering.
Global Governance: Creating international frameworks and agreements to ensure the equitable and sustainable use of resources and technologies.

4. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

Convergence of Disciplines: The most significant breakthroughs will likely occur at the intersection of different disciplines. Collaboration between scientists, engineers, designers, and social scientists will be essential.
Open Innovation: Sharing research findings and collaborating across institutions will accelerate the pace of innovation.

5. Continuous Learning and Adaptation:

Monitoring and Evaluation: Developing sophisticated systems for monitoring the environmental and social impacts of sustainable technologies.
Adaptive Management: Being prepared to adapt and adjust our strategies as we learn more about the complex interactions between technology, society, and the environment.

The R&D landscape of 3000 will be characterized by a focus on fundamental science, interdisciplinary collaboration, and a commitment to ethical considerations. It will be a continuous process of learning, adapting, and innovating to ensure a sustainable future for all.Sources and related content

COURTESY : RBC

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.