Sustainable Technology of 2910

Sustainable Technology of 2910 ?

Unfortunately, I cannot provide specific details about sustainable technology in the year 2910. Predicting the future with such precision is simply not possible. Technology evolves rapidly, and the specific forms it might take centuries from now are beyond our current comprehension.

However, I can offer some insights into the general trajectory of sustainable technology and potential areas of focus in the future:

Potential Focus Areas for Sustainable Technology in the Future:

• Advanced Energy Solutions:
  • Continued development of renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and geothermal, potentially with increased efficiency and integration.
  • Exploration of new energy sources such as fusion power or advanced forms of nuclear energy.
  • Development of sophisticated energy storage solutions to address intermittency challenges of renewable energy.
• Resource Management and Circular Economy:
  • Advanced recycling technologies to recover and reuse materials from waste streams with near-perfect efficiency.
  • Development of biodegradable and sustainable alternatives to traditional materials like plastics.
  • Implementation of closed-loop systems in manufacturing and consumption to minimize waste and pollution.
• Environmental Remediation and Restoration:
  • Technologies to remove pollutants from air and water, potentially including advanced filtration and bioremediation techniques.
  • Methods to restore damaged ecosystems and potentially reverse some of the effects of climate change.
  • Development of climate engineering technologies to mitigate the impacts of greenhouse gas emissions.
• Sustainable Agriculture and Food Systems:
  • Precision agriculture techniques to optimize resource use and minimize environmental impact.
  • Development of alternative protein sources and sustainable food production methods.
  • Technologies to reduce food waste and improve food distribution systems.
• Smart and Sustainable Infrastructure:
  • Development of smart grids and energy-efficient buildings to optimize energy consumption.
  • Sustainable transportation systems, potentially including electric vehicles and advanced public transportation.
  • Infrastructure designed to withstand the impacts of climate change and natural disasters.

General Trends in Sustainable Technology:

• Increased Efficiency and Performance: Future technologies will likely be more efficient and perform better with less environmental impact.
• Integration of Technologies: Sustainable solutions will likely involve the integration of multiple technologies, such as renewable energy with smart grids or resource recovery with manufacturing processes.
• Emphasis on Circularity: The concept of a circular economy will become increasingly important, with a focus on minimizing waste and maximizing resource reuse.
• Data-Driven Decision Making: Advanced sensors and data analytics will play a crucial role in optimizing resource use and environmental performance.

Important Considerations:

• Ethical Implications: As technology advances, it’s crucial to consider the ethical implications of its development and deployment, ensuring equitable access and avoiding unintended consequences.
• Social and Economic Factors: Sustainable technology must be integrated with social and economic systems to ensure its widespread adoption and effectiveness.
• Global Collaboration: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource depletion will require international cooperation and collaboration in the development and implementation of sustainable technologies.

While I cannot predict the exact nature of sustainable technology in 2910, it’s likely to be characterized by advanced solutions that address environmental challenges, promote resource efficiency, and support a more sustainable future for generations to come.

You stopped this response

What is Sustainable Technology of 2910 ?

It’s exciting to think about sustainable technology in 2910! While we can’t know for sure what it will look like, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and the challenges we face today. Here are some possibilities:

1. Energy:

• Fusion power: Perhaps by 2910, fusion energy will be a practical and widespread source of clean, abundant power.
• Space-based solar: Imagine massive solar arrays in space beaming energy back to Earth. This could provide a constant, reliable source of renewable energy.
• Advanced energy storage: We’ll likely have incredibly efficient ways to store energy, solving the intermittency problem of solar and wind power. Think of it like super-batteries that can power entire cities for weeks.

2. Resource Management:

• Circular economy mastery: By 2910, we might have perfected the circular economy. Everything is recycled, reused, or repurposed. Waste as we know it might be a thing of the past.
• Biomanufacturing: We could be growing materials instead of mining them. Imagine buildings made from engineered wood or plastics grown from algae.
• Material regeneration: Perhaps we’ll have technologies that can actually repair or regenerate materials at a molecular level, extending the lifespan of everything we create.

3. Environment:

• Climate engineering: If necessary, we might have developed safe and effective ways to manage the Earth’s climate, such as carbon capture technologies or methods to reflect sunlight back into space.
• Ecosystem restoration: We might have advanced techniques to heal damaged ecosystems, even bringing back extinct species or restoring lost forests and coral reefs.
• Pollution reversal: Technologies could exist to actively clean up pollution from the air, water, and soil, even reversing the damage caused by past industrial activity.

4. Food:

• Vertical farms and lab-grown food: Food production could be highly localized and efficient, with massive vertical farms in cities and lab-grown meat and other products reducing the need for traditional agriculture.
• Personalized nutrition: We might have a deep understanding of how food affects our bodies, leading to personalized diets and even ways to optimize our health through nutrition.
• Waste-free food systems: Food waste could be a thing of the past, with every part of the food production process optimized to minimize loss and maximize use.

5. Technology:

• AI-powered sustainability: Artificial intelligence could be playing a huge role in optimizing resource use, predicting environmental problems, and developing new sustainable technologies.  
• Nanotechnology: We might be able to manipulate matter at the atomic level, leading to incredible new materials and technologies with applications in energy, medicine, and environmental science.  
• Biotechnology: Advances in biotechnology could revolutionize everything from medicine to agriculture, with engineered organisms helping us produce clean energy, grow food more efficiently, and even clean up pollution.

Important Note: It’s crucial to remember that technology alone won’t solve our sustainability challenges. Social, economic, and political factors will also play a huge role. In 2910, we’ll hopefully have a global society that values sustainability and works together to create a healthy planet for all.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2910 ?

It’s fascinating to consider who would need sustainable technology in 2910! Here’s a breakdown of potential beneficiaries:

1. Humanity:

• General Population: Everyone on Earth would rely on sustainable technology for basic needs like food, water, shelter, energy, and transportation.
• Future Generations: Sustainable technology is fundamentally about ensuring a habitable planet and sufficient resources for those who come after us.  
• Vulnerable Populations: Those in resource-scarce regions or communities most affected by climate change would depend on sustainable technology for resilience and survival.

2. Ecosystems and the Natural World:

• Biodiversity: Sustainable technology would be crucial for preserving and restoring ecosystems, protecting endangered species, and maintaining the planet’s biological diversity.
• Natural Resources: Sustainable practices would be essential for managing and conserving resources like water, forests, and minerals.  
• Planetary Health: The overall health of the Earth’s systems (atmosphere, oceans, land) would depend on sustainable technology to mitigate pollution, manage climate change, and maintain balance.

3. Industries and Organizations:

• Businesses: Companies in all sectors would need sustainable technology to reduce their environmental impact, comply with regulations, and meet consumer demand for eco-friendly products and services.  
• Governments: Nations and local authorities would depend on sustainable technology to build resilient infrastructure, manage resources, and provide public services in an environmentally responsible way.
• Researchers and Innovators: Scientists, engineers, and technologists would be crucial in developing and refining sustainable solutions for a wide range of challenges.

4. Other Potential Beneficiaries:

• Off-world Colonies: If humanity has expanded beyond Earth by 2910, sustainable technology would be even more critical for establishing and maintaining self-sufficient settlements in space or on other planets.
• Other Species: While it might seem unusual, sustainable technology could indirectly benefit other species by preserving habitats, reducing pollution, and mitigating climate change.

Key Considerations:

• Equity: It’s essential that sustainable technology in 2910 is accessible and beneficial to all of humanity, not just a privileged few.
• Interconnectedness: Sustainable solutions must consider the interconnectedness of human society and the natural world, addressing the needs of both.
• Adaptability: Given the uncertainties of the future, sustainable technology should be adaptable and capable of responding to new challenges and evolving conditions.

Ultimately, sustainable technology in 2910 would be necessary for the continued well-being of humanity, the health of the planet, and the flourishing of life in all its forms.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2910 ?

That’s a great question! It’s not just who needs sustainable technology in 2910, but when it will be needed. Here’s a breakdown of the timeline:

• Now (and the Immediate Future): We need sustainable technology right now to address the urgent challenges of climate change, resource depletion, and environmental degradation. The sooner we develop and implement sustainable solutions, the better the chances for a healthy planet in 2910.
• The Coming Decades and Centuries: Sustainable technology will be increasingly crucial in the coming years and centuries as populations grow, resources become scarcer, and the impacts of climate change intensify. We need to constantly innovate and adapt to ensure a sustainable future.
• 2910 and Beyond: By 2910, sustainable technology will likely be an integral part of everyday life, essential for maintaining a healthy planet and supporting human civilization. It will be needed to:
  • Maintain balance: By 2910, we may have already experienced significant environmental changes. Sustainable technology will be critical for maintaining a balance within the Earth’s systems and preventing further damage.
  • Adapt to change: Even with the best efforts, some environmental changes may be unavoidable. Sustainable technology will be needed to help humanity adapt to these changes and build resilient communities.
  • Ensure long-term survival: Ultimately, sustainable technology will be necessary for the long-term survival of humanity and the preservation of life on Earth.

Key Takeaways:

• Urgency: The need for sustainable technology is urgent. We cannot afford to wait for future generations to solve these problems.
• Continuous Development: Sustainable technology is not a one-time solution. It requires continuous development, innovation, and adaptation to meet evolving challenges.  
• Long-Term Vision: We need to think long-term about the kind of world we want to create and use sustainable technology to achieve that vision.

It’s important to remember that the decisions we make today will have a profound impact on the world of 2910. By prioritizing sustainable technology now, we can help ensure a brighter future for generations to come.

COURTESY : Voith Group

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2910 ?

This is a truly fascinating question! It forces us to think beyond our current understanding of the world and imagine the needs of a society centuries in the future. Here are some potential “wheres” for sustainable technology in 2910:

1. Earth’s Surface:

• Urban Centers: Cities will likely be hubs of sustainable technology, with advanced infrastructure for energy efficiency, waste management, and resource optimization.
• Rural Areas: Sustainable technology will be crucial for food production, water management, and supporting communities in remote or challenging environments.
• Extreme Environments: Sustainable solutions will be needed to enable human habitation in harsh environments like deserts, polar regions, or even underwater.
• Restored Ecosystems: Sustainable technology will play a vital role in maintaining and restoring natural ecosystems like forests, oceans, and wetlands.

2. Beyond Earth:

• Space Habitats: If humanity has expanded beyond Earth, sustainable technology will be essential for creating self-sufficient settlements in space or on other planets.
• Other Planets/Moons: Sustainable resource extraction and utilization will be crucial for any off-world colonization or exploration efforts.
• Asteroids and Other Celestial Bodies: Sustainable technology could be used to mine resources from asteroids or other celestial bodies in a responsible way.  

3. Within the Human Body:

• Personalized Medicine: Sustainable technology could be used to develop personalized medicine and therapies that are tailored to an individual’s genetic makeup and health needs.
• Human Augmentation: Sustainable technology might play a role in enhancing human capabilities through prosthetics, implants, or other forms of augmentation.

4. In the Digital Realm:

• Virtual Worlds: As virtual reality and digital environments become more sophisticated, sustainable technology will be needed to power these worlds in an energy-efficient way.  
• Artificial Intelligence: AI systems will likely play a crucial role in optimizing resource use and developing new sustainable technologies.  

Key Considerations:

• Interconnectedness: Sustainable technology in 2910 will likely be highly interconnected, with solutions in one area impacting others.
• Adaptability: Given the uncertainties of the future, sustainable technology should be adaptable and capable of responding to new challenges and evolving conditions.
• Accessibility: It’s essential that sustainable technology is accessible and beneficial to all of humanity, regardless of location or background.

Ultimately, the “where” of sustainable technology in 2910 will depend on the needs and challenges of that era. But one thing is certain: sustainable solutions will be essential for ensuring a thriving future for humanity and the planet, wherever we may be.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2910 ?

This is where it gets really interesting! Imagining how sustainable technology might function in 2910 requires us to think about the very fabric of society and its relationship with the environment. Here are some possibilities:

1. Embedded and Invisible:

• Ambient Sustainability: Perhaps by 2910, sustainable technology will be so deeply integrated into our lives that it’s almost invisible. Buildings might generate their own energy, materials could self-repair, and waste might be processed at the molecular level, all without us even noticing.
• Smart Infrastructure: Cities could be managed by sophisticated AI systems that optimize energy use, traffic flow, and resource distribution in real-time, minimizing environmental impact.  
• Personalized Ecosystems: We might live in environments tailored to our individual needs, with localized systems for food production, water purification, and waste recycling.

2. Decentralized and Autonomous:

• Microgrids and Local Energy: Energy could be generated and distributed through local microgrids, powered by renewable sources and managed by AI systems.
• Personalized Manufacturing: 3D printing and biomanufacturing could allow us to produce goods on demand, minimizing waste and transportation needs.
• Citizen Science and Environmental Monitoring: Individuals might play an active role in monitoring environmental conditions and contributing to sustainable solutions through personal sensors and data sharing.

3. Biological and Biomimetic:

• Living Technologies: We might use living organisms to perform tasks like energy generation, waste treatment, and even material production. Imagine buildings with walls made of algae that absorb CO2 and generate energy!
• Biomimicry: Technology could be inspired by nature, mimicking biological processes to create sustainable solutions. For example, solar panels might be designed like leaves to maximize energy absorption.  
• Symbiotic Systems: Humans and technology could exist in a symbiotic relationship, with technology helping us live more sustainably and the environment benefiting from our presence.  

4. Adaptive and Resilient:

• Dynamic Infrastructure: Infrastructure could be designed to adapt to changing environmental conditions, such as rising sea levels or extreme weather events.  
• Resource Flexibility: We might have developed ways to use a wide range of resources and adapt to changing availability.
• Closed-Loop Systems: Everything from energy production to manufacturing could operate in closed-loop systems, minimizing waste and maximizing resource reuse.

Key Considerations:

• Human-Technology Interaction: How we interact with sustainable technology in 2910 will be crucial. Will it be intuitive and user-friendly, or will it require specialized knowledge?
• Social and Ethical Implications: The way sustainable technology is implemented will have profound social and ethical implications. It’s essential to ensure that it benefits everyone and doesn’t create new inequalities.
• Unforeseen Developments: It’s impossible to predict all the ways sustainable technology might be used in 2910. There will likely be innovations and applications that we can’t even imagine today.

Ultimately, the “how” of sustainable technology in 2910 will depend on the creativity, ingenuity, and values of the people who develop and use it. By prioritizing sustainability today, we can help shape a future where technology and nature coexist in harmony.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2910 ?

It’s challenging to create a traditional “case study” for sustainable technology in 2910, as that would involve concrete examples and data from a time we haven’t reached yet. However, we can construct a hypothetical case study based on current trends and potential future developments.

Hypothetical Case Study: The Revitalization of the Amazon Rainforest in 2910

Background:

By the early 21st century, deforestation and climate change had severely impacted the Amazon rainforest, threatening its biodiversity and vital role in regulating the Earth’s climate. Various efforts to combat these issues had limited success.  

The 2910 Solution:

A combination of advanced sustainable technologies and global cooperation led to the revitalization of the Amazon rainforest. Here’s how:

1. AI-Powered Ecosystem Management:
   • Sophisticated AI systems continuously monitored the rainforest, analyzing data from sensors, satellites, and even animal-borne devices.
   • These systems identified areas at risk, predicted potential threats (like fires or disease outbreaks), and recommended targeted interventions.
2. Advanced Reforestation Techniques:
   • Drones and autonomous robots were used to plant native trees and distribute seeds in deforested areas.
   • Biotechnology was employed to develop tree species more resilient to climate change and disease.
   • Nanotechnology was used to create soil amendments that enhanced water retention and nutrient availability, promoting faster growth.
3. Sustainable Economic Development:
   • Local communities were empowered through access to sustainable technologies and education.
   • Eco-tourism initiatives provided economic incentives for preserving the rainforest.  
   • Sustainable agriculture and forestry practices were implemented, reducing pressure on the forest.
4. Climate Engineering:
   • If necessary, climate engineering technologies were deployed to mitigate the impacts of climate change, such as carbon capture and storage or solar radiation management.

Results:

• By 2910, the Amazon rainforest had regained much of its former glory, with increased biodiversity and resilience.
• The rainforest played a crucial role in regulating the global climate, contributing to a more stable and habitable planet.
• Local communities thrived, benefiting from the restored ecosystem and sustainable economic opportunities.

Lessons Learned:

• This hypothetical case study highlights the potential of sustainable technology to address complex environmental challenges.
• It emphasizes the importance of combining technological solutions with social, economic, and political strategies.
• It demonstrates the need for global cooperation and long-term vision to achieve sustainability goals.

Important Note:

This is just one possible scenario. The actual development and application of sustainable technology in 2910 could be very different. However, this case study illustrates the kind of transformative impact sustainable solutions might have on the world of the future.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2910 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 2910: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 2910. While predicting the future with certainty is impossible, we can extrapolate from current trends and emerging technologies to envision a world where sustainability is deeply integrated into every facet of human life. This paper examines potential advancements in key areas, including energy, resource management, environmental remediation, food systems, and infrastructure, while also considering the crucial social and ethical implications of such technologies.

1. Introduction:

The 21st century faces unprecedented environmental challenges, including climate change, resource depletion, and biodiversity loss. Sustainable technology offers the promise of mitigating these challenges and creating a future where humanity can thrive in harmony with the planet. By 2910, we anticipate that sustainable practices will be not just desirable, but essential for survival and well-being.

2. Energy:

• Fusion Energy Dominance: Fusion power, after centuries of development, may have become a primary energy source, providing clean, abundant power with minimal waste.
• Space-Based Solar Power: Large-scale solar arrays in orbit could capture vast amounts of solar energy and beam it back to Earth, providing a constant and reliable energy supply.
• Advanced Energy Storage: Highly efficient energy storage solutions, perhaps based on advanced battery technologies or other novel methods, will address the intermittency of renewable energy sources.

3. Resource Management:

• Circular Economy Mastery: Closed-loop systems will be the norm, with near-total recycling and reuse of materials. “Waste” as we understand it today will be a relic of the past.
• Biomanufacturing and Material Regeneration: Materials may be grown rather than mined, and technologies capable of repairing or regenerating materials at the molecular level could drastically extend product lifecycles.
• Resource Optimization through AI: Artificial intelligence will play a key role in managing resources efficiently, predicting demand, and minimizing waste across all sectors.

4. Environmental Remediation:

• Climate Engineering Technologies: Advanced and safe climate engineering techniques may be available to mitigate the impacts of past greenhouse gas emissions and manage the Earth’s climate.
• Ecosystem Restoration: Sophisticated methods for restoring damaged ecosystems, including reforestation, ocean revitalization, and species recovery, could help reverse past environmental damage.
• Pollution Reversal: Nanotechnology and other advanced technologies may enable the active removal of pollutants from air, water, and soil.

5. Food Systems:

• Vertical Farms and Controlled Environment Agriculture: Highly efficient vertical farms and controlled environment agriculture could produce food locally and sustainably, minimizing land use and water consumption.
• Alternative Protein Sources: Lab-grown meat, insect protein, and other alternative protein sources could reduce the environmental impact of traditional animal agriculture.
• Personalized Nutrition: A deep understanding of human biology and nutrition could lead to personalized diets and optimized food production.

6. Infrastructure:

• Smart and Adaptive Infrastructure: Buildings and infrastructure will be designed to be energy-efficient, resilient to climate change, and adaptable to changing needs.
• Sustainable Transportation: Electric vehicles, advanced public transportation systems, and potentially even personal air mobility could provide sustainable transportation options.
• Decentralized Infrastructure: Microgrids, local water treatment facilities, and other decentralized systems could enhance resilience and reduce reliance on centralized infrastructure.

7. Social and Ethical Considerations:

• Equity and Access: Ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies and the benefits they provide will be crucial.
• Governance and Regulation: Robust governance frameworks will be needed to manage the development and deployment of sustainable technologies and address potential ethical concerns.
• Human-Technology Symbiosis: Understanding the complex relationship between humans and technology will be essential for creating a sustainable future that benefits both.

8. Conclusion:

The sustainable technology of 2910 represents a vision of hope for a thriving future. By embracing innovation, prioritizing sustainability, and addressing the social and ethical dimensions of technological development, we can create a world where humanity and nature coexist in harmony. This vision requires sustained effort, collaboration, and a long-term perspective, but the potential rewards are immense.

Disclaimer: This white paper presents a hypothetical vision of sustainable technology in 2910. The actual future may differ significantly depending on various factors, including technological advancements, social and political developments, and unforeseen events.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2910 ?

You’re asking about the really exciting stuff! How might industries operate in a world where sustainability is paramount? Here are some potential industrial applications of sustainable technology in 2910:

1. Manufacturing:

• Closed-Loop Production: Factories would operate on closed-loop systems, with raw materials being endlessly recycled and reused. Waste would be virtually eliminated, and pollution drastically reduced.
• Biomanufacturing: Imagine factories that “grow” materials instead of mining or producing them through traditional means. This could involve using engineered organisms to create plastics, fabrics, or even building materials.  
• Personalized Production: 3D printing and other advanced manufacturing techniques could allow for highly personalized production, reducing waste and enabling on-demand creation of goods.  

2. Energy:

• Fusion-Powered Industries: Industries would likely be powered by clean and abundant fusion energy, eliminating reliance on fossil fuels and minimizing carbon emissions.
• Energy-Efficient Processes: Advanced technologies would be used to optimize energy use in all industrial processes, from manufacturing to transportation.  
• Renewable Resource Utilization: Industries would utilize renewable resources sustainably, such as using sustainably harvested biomass for biofuels or bioplastics.

3. Resource Extraction and Processing:

• Sustainable Mining: If mining is still necessary, it would be done with minimal environmental impact, using advanced techniques to reduce waste and restore ecosystems.
• Asteroid Mining: Potentially, resources could be extracted from asteroids or other celestial bodies, reducing the need to exploit Earth’s resources.  
• Material Regeneration: Technologies might exist to regenerate or repair materials at the molecular level, extending the lifespan of products and reducing the need for new resources.

4. Agriculture and Food Production:

• Vertical Farms and Controlled Environment Agriculture: Industries would utilize vertical farms and controlled environment agriculture to produce food locally and sustainably, minimizing land use and water consumption.  
• Alternative Protein Production: Large-scale production of alternative proteins, such as lab-grown meat or insect protein, could reduce the environmental impact of traditional animal agriculture.  
• Precision Agriculture: Advanced sensors and AI could be used to optimize resource use in agriculture, minimizing waste and maximizing yields.  

5. Construction and Infrastructure:

• Sustainable Building Materials: Buildings would be constructed from sustainable materials, such as engineered wood, recycled plastics, or even biomaterials grown in factories.
• Self-Healing Infrastructure: Infrastructure could be designed to self-repair, reducing maintenance costs and extending its lifespan.
• Adaptive Infrastructure: Infrastructure could be designed to adapt to changing environmental conditions, such as rising sea levels or extreme weather events.  

Key Considerations:

• Automation and AI: Many of these industrial applications would likely rely heavily on automation and artificial intelligence to optimize efficiency and minimize environmental impact.
• Circular Economy Principles: The concept of a circular economy would be central to all industrial processes, with a focus on minimizing waste and maximizing resource reuse.  
• Collaboration and Innovation: Achieving these industrial applications would require collaboration between different industries, researchers, and policymakers, as well as continuous innovation and development of new technologies.

It’s important to remember that this is just a glimpse into the potential industrial applications of sustainable technology in 2910. The actual future could be very different, but these examples highlight the transformative potential of sustainable solutions for creating a thriving and environmentally responsible industrial sector.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2910 ?

It’s fascinating to imagine the kind of research and development that might be happening in 2910 to advance sustainable technology! Here are some potential areas of focus:

• New Energy Sources: Research into harnessing new forms of energy, perhaps beyond fusion, such as zero-point energy or other theoretical possibilities.
• Material Science Breakthroughs: Discovering new materials with extraordinary properties, like perfect conductivity, self-healing capabilities, or the ability to manipulate gravity.
• Understanding Complex Systems: Developing a deeper understanding of Earth’s complex systems, including climate, ecosystems, and the interactions between them, to better predict and manage environmental change.

2. Advanced Technologies:

• Quantum Computing for Sustainability: Utilizing quantum computing to model complex environmental systems, optimize energy grids, and design new sustainable materials.  
• Nanotechnology for Environmental Remediation: Developing advanced nanomaterials for targeted pollution removal, resource recovery, and even climate engineering.
• Artificial Intelligence for Global Optimization: Creating AI systems capable of managing global resources, predicting environmental risks, and coordinating sustainable development efforts on a planetary scale.

3. Biotechnology and Biomimicry:

• Engineered Organisms for Sustainable Production: Designing microorganisms to produce biofuels, bioplastics, and other valuable materials from renewable resources.  
• Biomimetic Technologies for Energy Efficiency: Mimicking biological processes to create more efficient solar panels, energy storage devices, and other sustainable technologies.  
• Synthetic Biology for Ecosystem Restoration: Using synthetic biology to engineer organisms that can help restore damaged ecosystems or even create new ones.

4. Social and Ethical Dimensions:

• Sustainable Development Pathways: Researching different pathways to achieve global sustainability, considering social, economic, and environmental factors.
• Ethical Frameworks for Technology Development: Developing ethical guidelines and regulations for the development and deployment of advanced technologies, ensuring they are used responsibly and for the benefit of all.
• Human-Technology Interaction: Studying the complex relationship between humans and technology to design sustainable solutions that are user-friendly, accessible, and promote well-being.

5. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

• Convergence of Disciplines: Fostering collaboration between scientists, engineers, social scientists, and other experts to address complex sustainability challenges.
• Global Research Networks: Establishing global research networks to share knowledge, coordinate efforts, and accelerate the development of sustainable technologies.  
• Citizen Science and Public Engagement: Engaging the public in research and innovation through citizen science initiatives and educational programs to promote a culture of sustainability.

Key Considerations:

• Long-Term Vision: Research and development in 2910 would likely be guided by a long-term vision of a sustainable future, with a focus on addressing fundamental challenges and creating lasting solutions.
• Adaptive Research: Given the uncertainties of the future, research efforts would need to be adaptable and capable of responding to new challenges and evolving conditions.
• Ethical Responsibility: Researchers in 2910 would have a strong sense of ethical responsibility, ensuring that their work benefits humanity and the planet.

It’s important to remember that this is just a speculative look at potential research and development directions in 2910. The actual focus of research will depend on the challenges and opportunities of that era. However, it’s clear that research and innovation will play a crucial role in creating a sustainable future for humanity.Sources and related content

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

References

1. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r} Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
2. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
3. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
4. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
5. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u} Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
6. ^ Jump up to:^a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
8. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
10. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
11. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
12. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
16. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
17. ^ Jump up to:^a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
18. ^ Jump up to:^a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
20. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
21. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
22. ^ Jump up to:^a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
23. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i} Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
24. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
27. ^ Jump up to:^a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
39. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
40. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
41. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
43. ^ Jump up to:^a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
44. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
49. ^ Jump up to:^a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
51. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
53. ^ Jump up to:^a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
67. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
72. ^ Jump up to:^a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
77. ^ Jump up to:^a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
79. ^ Jump up to:^a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
80. ^ Jump up to:^a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
85. ^ Jump up to:^a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
89. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
92. ^ Jump up to:^a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
96. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
97. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
103. ^ Jump up to:^a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
107. ^ Jump up to:^a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.