Sustainable Technology of 2890

Sustainable Technology of 2890 ?

Unfortunately, I cannot provide you with specific details about sustainable technology in the year 2890. Predicting that far into the future is simply beyond our current capabilities. Technology evolves rapidly, and unforeseen discoveries and innovations can drastically alter its course.  

However, I can offer some insights into the general trends and possibilities of sustainable technology in the long term:

• Renewable Energy Dominance: It’s highly probable that renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and geothermal will be the primary energy providers. Advancements in energy storage and distribution will likely solve the intermittency challenges associated with these sources.  
• Advanced Materials: We can expect the development of new materials with exceptional properties like super strength, lightweightness, and biodegradability. These materials will be crucial for creating sustainable infrastructure, transportation, and consumer goods.
• Circular Economy: The concept of a circular economy, where resources are continuously reused and recycled, will be deeply ingrained in technology and manufacturing processes. Waste will be minimized, and products will be designed for disassembly and material recovery.
• Artificial Intelligence and Automation: AI and automation will play a crucial role in optimizing resource usage, managing energy grids, and developing sustainable solutions. Smart systems will monitor and control various aspects of our lives to minimize environmental impact.  
• Biotechnology and Biomimicry: Biotechnology will likely provide us with new ways to produce food, materials, and energy. Biomimicry, where we imitate natural processes and designs, will inspire innovative and sustainable technologies.  
• Decentralized Systems: We might see a shift towards more decentralized systems for energy production, water management, and even manufacturing. This can increase resilience and reduce reliance on large, centralized infrastructure.  

It’s important to remember that these are just potential trends. The actual path of sustainable technology will depend on various factors, including scientific breakthroughs, economic conditions, and societal choices.

If you’re interested in learning more about current trends in sustainable technology, I recommend exploring resources like:

• IEEE: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) is a leading organization in technology and engineering. They have various initiatives and publications related to sustainable technology.  
• MDPI: The Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) publishes a journal called “Sustainable Energy Technology” that covers the latest research in this field.  
• HPE: Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) offers resources and information on sustainable IT practices and technologies.  
• Infineon Technologies: Infineon is a company focused on semiconductor solutions. They have a strong commitment to environmental sustainability and provide information on their initiatives.  

By staying informed about current developments and trends, you can better understand the potential future of sustainable technology.Sources and related content

What is Sustainable Technology of 2890 ?

Predicting the exact nature of sustainable technology in 2890 is impossible. However, based on current trends and potential advancements, here are some educated guesses:

1. Energy:

• Fusion Power: Perhaps by 2890, fusion energy will be a viable and widespread source of clean, abundant power.
• Space-Based Solar: Massive solar arrays in space could beam energy down to Earth, providing a constant and reliable source.  
• Advanced Energy Storage: Nanotechnology might enable incredibly efficient and compact energy storage solutions, making renewable energy sources like solar and wind more reliable.  

2. Materials:

• Self-Healing Materials: Materials that can repair themselves could significantly extend the lifespan of infrastructure and reduce waste.  
• Bio-Integrated Materials: Materials grown from biological sources could be both strong and biodegradable, minimizing environmental impact.
• Programmable Matter: Materials that can change their properties on demand could revolutionize manufacturing and construction.

3. Resource Management:

• Closed-Loop Recycling: Advanced recycling technologies could enable nearly 100% resource recovery, eliminating the concept of waste.
• Atmospheric Capture: Technologies to capture and utilize carbon dioxide from the atmosphere could help mitigate climate change and provide resources for manufacturing.  
• Water Purification: Highly efficient and decentralized water purification systems could ensure access to clean water for everyone.

4. Agriculture:

• Vertical Farms: Multi-story, highly automated farms could be located in urban centers, reducing transportation needs and land use.  
• Precision Agriculture: Sensors and AI could optimize crop yields while minimizing water and fertilizer use.  
• Lab-Grown Food: Cultured meat and other lab-grown foods could reduce the environmental impact of traditional agriculture.  

5. Transportation:

• Flying Cars: Electric or hydrogen-powered flying cars could revolutionize personal transportation, reducing traffic congestion and emissions.
• Hyperloop Networks: High-speed hyperloop systems could connect cities and regions, enabling rapid and efficient travel.  
• Autonomous Vehicles: Self-driving vehicles could optimize traffic flow and reduce accidents.  

6. Artificial Intelligence:

• AI for Sustainability: AI could be used to optimize energy grids, manage resources, and develop new sustainable technologies.  
• Smart Cities: AI-powered systems could monitor and manage city infrastructure, improving efficiency and reducing environmental impact.  

7. Biotechnology:

• Bioremediation: Microorganisms could be used to clean up pollution and restore damaged ecosystems.  
• Bio-Manufacturing: Biological processes could be used to produce materials and chemicals, reducing reliance on fossil fuels.

8. Space Colonization:

• Off-World Resources: Mining resources from asteroids or other planets could reduce the strain on Earth’s resources.  
• Space Habitats: Self-sustaining space colonies could provide a backup for humanity and expand our understanding of the universe.

Important Considerations:

• Ethical Implications: As technology advances, it’s crucial to consider the ethical implications of these developments and ensure they are used for the benefit of humanity and the planet.
• Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity will require international cooperation and a shared vision for a sustainable future.

While we can’t know for sure what sustainable technology will look like in 2890, it’s clear that innovation and a commitment to sustainability will be essential for creating a thriving future for generations to come.Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2890 ?

It’s more accurate to say that sustainable technology in 2890 would be essential for everyone, rather than required by specific individuals. Here’s why:

• Planetary Survival: By 2890, the consequences of unsustainable practices may be far more severe. Sustainable technology would be crucial for mitigating climate change, managing resources, and ensuring the planet remains habitable. This is a collective need, not just for certain groups.
• Resource Scarcity: As resources become more scarce, sustainable technologies for resource management, recycling, and alternative production methods would be vital for everyone to maintain a decent standard of living.
• Economic Stability: In a world facing environmental challenges, sustainable technologies would be key to economic stability. They would drive new industries, create jobs, and ensure long-term prosperity. This benefits everyone, regardless of their background.
• Social Equity: Sustainable technology can help address social inequalities by providing access to clean energy, clean water, and essential resources for all. This promotes a more just and equitable society.

However, certain groups might have a greater responsibility in developing and implementing sustainable technology:

• Scientists and Engineers: They are at the forefront of innovation, developing new sustainable technologies and finding solutions to environmental challenges.
• Leaders and Policymakers: They have the power to set policies and regulations that promote sustainable practices and incentivize the adoption of sustainable technology.
• Businesses and Industries: They are responsible for implementing sustainable practices in their operations and developing sustainable products and services.
• Educators: They play a crucial role in educating future generations about sustainability and the importance of sustainable technology.

Ultimately, the need for sustainable technology in 2890 would be a shared responsibility. Everyone would need to contribute in their own way to ensure a sustainable future for humanity and the planet.

It’s important to remember that sustainable technology is not just about technological advancements. It also involves social, economic, and political changes. It requires a shift in mindset and a collective commitment to creating a more sustainable world.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2890 ?

While we can’t pinpoint an exact date for when sustainable technology will be required in 2890, it’s safe to say that the need for it will be increasingly urgent as we approach that time. Here’s why:

• Environmental Degradation: The continued impact of climate change, resource depletion, and pollution will likely make sustainable technology not just desirable, but essential for survival. The closer we get to 2890, the more severe these challenges may become, making sustainable solutions a necessity.
• Resource Scarcity: As resources become more scarce, the cost of unsustainable practices will increase. Sustainable technologies for resource management, recycling, and alternative production methods will become economically vital.
• Population Growth: If the global population continues to grow, the strain on resources and the environment will intensify. Sustainable technology will be crucial for meeting the needs of a larger population without further damaging the planet.  

However, the need for sustainable technology is not just a future concern. It’s critical now. The longer we wait to adopt sustainable practices, the more difficult and costly it will be to address the challenges we face.

Here’s a timeline of how the urgency for sustainable technology might evolve:

• Present: We are already experiencing the effects of climate change and resource depletion. Sustainable technology is needed now to mitigate these impacts and transition to a more sustainable future.  
• Near Future (next few decades): As environmental challenges worsen, the need for sustainable technology will become more pressing. Governments, businesses, and individuals will need to prioritize sustainable practices to avoid the most catastrophic consequences.  
• Distant Future (2890 and beyond): By 2890, sustainable technology will likely be fundamental to human civilization. It will be essential for ensuring the planet remains habitable and for maintaining a decent standard of living for all.

It’s important to remember that sustainable technology is not just about avoiding future problems. It’s also about creating a better world now. Sustainable technologies can improve our quality of life, create new economic opportunities, and promote social equity.

Therefore, the best time to embrace sustainable technology is not in 2890, but today. By investing in sustainable solutions and adopting sustainable practices, we can create a brighter future for ourselves and for generations to come.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Voith Group

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2890 ?

This is a fascinating question! It’s not just about when sustainable technology will be needed, but also where it will be crucial in 2890. Here are some key areas:

1. Urban Centers:

• Dense Populations: Cities will likely be even more densely populated by 2890. Sustainable technology will be essential for managing resources like energy, water, and waste in these concentrated areas.
• Vertical Farms: Urban centers might rely heavily on vertical farms to produce food locally, reducing transportation needs and land use.  
• Smart Infrastructure: AI-powered systems will likely monitor and manage city infrastructure, optimizing energy grids, transportation systems, and resource allocation.

2. Rural Areas:

• Resource Management: Sustainable technologies will be needed to manage natural resources in rural areas, including forests, water sources, and agricultural land.
• Renewable Energy: Rural areas may be ideal for generating renewable energy from sources like wind, solar, and biomass.  
• Sustainable Agriculture: Precision agriculture and other sustainable farming techniques will be crucial for producing food in an environmentally responsible way.

3. Remote Locations:

• Self-Sufficiency: Sustainable technology will be essential for enabling self-sufficiency in remote locations, such as islands or isolated communities.
• Off-Grid Solutions: These areas may rely on off-grid renewable energy systems, water purification systems, and other sustainable technologies.

4. Space:

• Space Colonies: If humanity has established space colonies by 2890, sustainable technology will be crucial for creating self-sustaining habitats.
• Resource Extraction: Sustainable methods for extracting resources from asteroids or other planets may be necessary.

5. Oceans:

• Ocean Farming: Sustainable aquaculture and ocean farming could provide a source of food while protecting marine ecosystems.  
• Clean Energy: Ocean currents and waves could be harnessed to generate clean energy.  

6. Global Atmosphere:

• Carbon Capture: Technologies to capture and utilize carbon dioxide from the atmosphere will be needed to mitigate climate change.
• Geoengineering: If necessary, geoengineering techniques may be used to regulate the Earth’s climate.

Important Considerations:

• Equity: Sustainable technology should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status.
• Adaptation: Sustainable solutions will need to be adapted to the specific environmental and social conditions of different regions.
• Resilience: Sustainable systems should be resilient to natural disasters and other unforeseen events.

Ultimately, sustainable technology in 2890 will be needed wherever humans live and interact with the environment. It will be crucial for ensuring a healthy planet and a thriving future for all.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2890 ?

That’s a great question! It’s not just about what sustainable technology will be needed in 2890, but also how it will be implemented and integrated into society. Here are some key aspects:

1. Global Collaboration:

• Shared Knowledge: International cooperation will be crucial for developing and sharing sustainable technologies. Open-source research, collaborative projects, and technology transfer will be essential.  
• Standardization: Global standards for sustainable technologies will ensure compatibility and facilitate their widespread adoption.
• Policy Coordination: International agreements and policies will be needed to address global challenges like climate change and resource management.  

2. Economic Incentives:

• Carbon Pricing: Implementing carbon pricing mechanisms can encourage businesses and individuals to adopt sustainable practices and invest in sustainable technology.  
• Green Finance: Financial institutions will need to play a key role in funding sustainable projects and providing incentives for sustainable development.  
• Circular Economy: Policies and incentives will be needed to promote the transition to a circular economy, where resources are continuously reused and recycled.  

3. Social and Cultural Shifts:

• Education: Educating future generations about sustainability and the importance of sustainable technology will be essential for creating a culture of sustainability.
• Public Awareness: Raising public awareness about environmental challenges and the benefits of sustainable technology can encourage individuals to adopt sustainable lifestyles.
• Ethical Considerations: It’s crucial to consider the ethical implications of new technologies and ensure they are used for the benefit of humanity and the planet.

4. Technological Advancements:

• Research and Development: Continued investment in research and development will be crucial for developing new sustainable technologies and improving existing ones.
• Innovation: Fostering innovation and entrepreneurship in the field of sustainable technology can lead to breakthroughs and new solutions.
• Integration: Sustainable technologies will need to be seamlessly integrated into existing infrastructure and systems.  

5. Governance and Regulation:

• Policy Frameworks: Governments will need to create policy frameworks that support sustainable development and incentivize the adoption of sustainable technology.  
• Regulations: Regulations may be needed to ensure that technologies are used in an environmentally responsible way and to prevent harm to the planet.
• Monitoring and Enforcement: Effective monitoring and enforcement mechanisms will be needed to ensure compliance with environmental regulations.

Important Considerations:

• Resilience: Sustainable systems should be resilient to natural disasters and other unforeseen events.  
• Adaptability: Sustainable solutions will need to be adaptable to the specific environmental and social conditions of different regions.
• Equity: Sustainable technology should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status.  

Ultimately, the successful implementation of sustainable technology in 2890 will require a holistic approach that considers technological, economic, social, and political factors. It will require a collective effort from governments, businesses, individuals, and the scientific community to create a sustainable future for all.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2890 ?

It’s tricky to create a “case study” for sustainable technology in 2890, as that implies analyzing a real-world example. However, we can construct a hypothetical scenario, drawing on current trends and potential future advancements, to illustrate how sustainable technology might function in that era.

Hypothetical Case Study: The Eco-City of Aurora, 2890

Background:

By 2890, many coastal cities have been impacted by rising sea levels. Aurora is a newly built city, designed from the ground up with sustainability as its core principle. It’s home to 1 million people and is a model for urban sustainability.

Sustainable Technologies in Action:

• Energy: Aurora is powered entirely by a network of space-based solar arrays that beam energy down to the city. Advanced energy storage solutions, utilizing nanotechnology, ensure a constant and reliable power supply, even when solar radiation is less intense.
• Materials: Buildings are constructed using self-healing bio-integrated materials grown from sustainable sources. These materials are both strong and biodegradable, minimizing the city’s environmental footprint.
• Resource Management: Aurora operates on a closed-loop recycling system. Nearly 100% of resources are recovered and reused, eliminating the concept of waste. Atmospheric capture technology is used to extract carbon dioxide from the air, which is then used to create new materials or fuels.  
• Food: The city has numerous vertical farms that produce a significant portion of its food locally. Precision agriculture techniques and AI-powered systems optimize crop yields while minimizing water and fertilizer use. Lab-grown meat and other alternative protein sources supplement the city’s food supply.  
• Transportation: Aurora features a network of electric flying cars that provide efficient and emission-free personal transportation. A high-speed hyperloop system connects Aurora to other cities and regions.  
• Water: Highly efficient and decentralized water purification systems ensure access to clean water for all residents. Water is recycled and reused throughout the city.  
• AI and Smart Systems: AI-powered systems monitor and manage all aspects of the city’s infrastructure, from energy grids and transportation systems to resource allocation and waste management. Smart sensors collect data on environmental conditions, allowing the city to adapt to changing needs.

Outcomes:

• Environmental Impact: Aurora has a minimal environmental footprint. Its carbon emissions are close to zero, and it has a negligible impact on local ecosystems.
• Quality of Life: Residents of Aurora enjoy a high quality of life, with access to clean energy, clean water, healthy food, and efficient transportation.
• Economic Prosperity: Aurora is a thriving economic hub, with a focus on sustainable industries and innovation.

Lessons Learned:

• Holistic Approach: The success of Aurora demonstrates the importance of a holistic approach to sustainability, integrating technological, social, and economic considerations.
• Long-Term Vision: Aurora was built with a long-term vision, prioritizing sustainability from the initial design stages.
• Global Collaboration: The development of Aurora benefited from global collaboration and the sharing of sustainable technologies.

Conclusion:

While this is a fictional example, it illustrates the potential of sustainable technology to create thriving and environmentally responsible cities in the future. By embracing sustainable practices and investing in innovation, we can work towards a future where cities like Aurora are not just a dream, but a reality.Sources and related content

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2890 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 2890: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 2890. While predicting the future with certainty is impossible, we can extrapolate from current trends and emerging technologies to envision a world where sustainability is deeply integrated into every facet of human life. This paper outlines potential advancements in key areas, highlighting the interconnectedness of these technologies and their crucial role in ensuring a thriving future for humanity.

1. Introduction:

The 29th century presents both immense challenges and extraordinary opportunities. Continued population growth, resource depletion, and the lingering effects of climate change necessitate a radical shift towards sustainable practices. This paper posits that by 2890, sustainable technology will be not just an aspiration, but the foundation upon which human civilization is built.

2. Energy:

• Fusion Energy Dominance: Controlled nuclear fusion, after centuries of development, may finally be a primary energy source, providing clean, abundant power.
• Space-Based Solar Power: Large-scale solar arrays in orbit could capture vast amounts of solar energy, beaming it back to Earth.
• Advanced Energy Storage: Nanotechnology could enable highly efficient and compact energy storage, overcoming the intermittency challenges of renewable sources.

3. Materials Science:

• Bio-Integrated Materials: Grown from renewable biological sources, these materials could be strong, durable, and biodegradable, revolutionizing construction and manufacturing.
• Self-Healing Materials: Incorporating nanotechnology, materials could automatically repair damage, extending lifespan and minimizing waste.
• Programmable Matter: Materials capable of changing their properties on demand could enable dynamic infrastructure and personalized products.

4. Resource Management:

• Closed-Loop Recycling: Advanced recycling technologies could achieve near-total resource recovery, eliminating the concept of waste and creating a true circular economy.
• Atmospheric Resource Capture: Technologies could extract valuable resources, including carbon dioxide, from the atmosphere, mitigating climate change and providing raw materials.
• Decentralized Water Management: Highly efficient and localized water purification and recycling systems could ensure access to clean water for all.

5. Food Production:

• Vertical Farming & Controlled Environment Agriculture: Urban centers could house massive vertical farms, maximizing food production while minimizing land use and transportation needs.
• Precision Agriculture: AI-powered systems could optimize crop yields, reducing water and fertilizer use and minimizing environmental impact.
• Cultivated Meat & Alternative Proteins: Lab-grown meat and other alternative protein sources could significantly reduce the environmental footprint of food production.

6. Transportation:

• Electric & Hydrogen-Powered Flight: Personal air vehicles and commercial aircraft could be powered by clean electricity or hydrogen, eliminating emissions from air travel.
• Hyperloop Networks: High-speed hyperloop systems could connect cities and regions, enabling rapid and efficient ground transportation.
• Autonomous Vehicles & Smart Traffic Management: AI-powered autonomous vehicles and smart traffic systems could optimize traffic flow, reducing congestion and emissions.

7. Artificial Intelligence & Automation:

• AI for Optimization: AI could play a critical role in optimizing energy grids, managing resources, and developing new sustainable technologies.
• Smart Cities: AI-powered systems could monitor and manage city infrastructure, improving efficiency and reducing environmental impact.

8. Biotechnology & Biomimicry:

• Bioremediation: Microorganisms could be used to clean up pollution and restore damaged ecosystems.
• Bio-Manufacturing: Biological processes could be used to produce materials and chemicals, reducing reliance on fossil fuels.
• Biomimicry: Learning from nature’s designs and processes could inspire innovative and sustainable technologies.

9. Space Exploration & Resource Utilization:

• Off-World Resources: Mining resources from asteroids or other celestial bodies could supplement Earth’s resources and reduce environmental impact.
• Space Habitats: Self-sustaining space colonies could provide a backup for humanity and expand our understanding of the universe.

10. Social & Ethical Considerations:

• Global Cooperation: International collaboration and knowledge sharing will be essential for developing and implementing sustainable technologies.
• Ethical Frameworks: Robust ethical frameworks will be needed to guide the development and use of these powerful technologies, ensuring they benefit all of humanity.
• Education & Public Awareness: Education and public awareness campaigns will be crucial for fostering a culture of sustainability and responsible technological advancement.

11. Conclusion:

The sustainable technology of 2890 represents a vision of hope and resilience. By embracing innovation, fostering collaboration, and prioritizing ethical considerations, humanity can create a future where technology empowers us to live in harmony with our planet and build a thriving civilization for generations to come. This vision requires sustained effort and commitment starting today, ensuring that the technological advancements we make now pave the way for a sustainable and prosperous future in 2890 and beyond.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2890 ?

It’s fascinating to imagine the industrial applications of sustainable technology in 2890! Here are some possibilities, extrapolating from current trends and potential future advancements:

1. Manufacturing:

• Bio-Integrated Factories: Imagine factories that “grow” products using bio-integrated materials. These materials, produced from renewable biological sources, could be programmed to assemble themselves into complex structures, from machines to consumer goods. This would revolutionize manufacturing, making it highly efficient and minimizing waste.
• Personalized Production: Programmable matter could enable on-demand manufacturing of personalized products. Consumers could design their own goods, and factories could use programmable matter to create them instantly. This would lead to a highly customized and resource-efficient economy.
• Closed-Loop Production: Factories would operate on closed-loop systems, where all resources are continuously reused and recycled. Advanced recycling technologies would recover nearly 100% of materials, eliminating waste and reducing the need for raw materials.

2. Construction:

• Self-Healing Infrastructure: Buildings and infrastructure could be constructed using self-healing materials that automatically repair damage. This would extend the lifespan of structures, reduce maintenance costs, and improve safety.  
• Dynamic Architecture: Programmable matter could enable the creation of dynamic buildings that can adapt to changing needs. Walls could reconfigure themselves to create new spaces, and buildings could even “grow” or “shrink” as needed.
• Sustainable Construction Materials: Bio-integrated materials and other sustainable materials would be used to construct buildings that have a minimal environmental footprint.  

3. Energy Production and Distribution:

• Fusion Power Plants: Fusion energy, if it becomes viable, could provide a clean and abundant source of power for industries. Fusion power plants would be highly efficient and produce minimal waste.  
• Space-Based Solar Power Stations: Industries could be powered by energy beamed down from space-based solar arrays. This would provide a constant and reliable source of clean energy.
• Smart Grids: AI-powered smart grids would optimize energy distribution, ensuring that energy is used efficiently and minimizing waste.  

4. Resource Extraction and Processing:

• Asteroid Mining: Mining resources from asteroids could provide a sustainable source of raw materials for industries. Advanced robotics and AI could automate the mining process, making it efficient and environmentally responsible.  
• Atmospheric Resource Capture: Industries could utilize technologies to capture resources from the atmosphere, such as carbon dioxide, which could be used to create new materials or fuels.
• Sustainable Mining Practices: Traditional mining practices would be replaced by more sustainable methods that minimize environmental impact and protect ecosystems.

5. Transportation and Logistics:

• Electric and Hydrogen-Powered Fleets: Industrial transportation fleets would be powered by clean electricity or hydrogen, eliminating emissions and reducing reliance on fossil fuels.
• Autonomous Vehicles and Drones: Autonomous vehicles and drones could be used to optimize logistics and transportation, making it more efficient and reducing costs.
• Hyperloop Networks: High-speed hyperloop systems could connect factories and distribution centers, enabling rapid and efficient transportation of goods.

6. Agriculture and Food Production:

• Vertical Farms and Automated Greenhouses: Industries could utilize vertical farms and automated greenhouses to produce food locally, reducing transportation needs and minimizing environmental impact.
• Precision Agriculture: AI-powered systems could optimize crop yields and resource use in agriculture, making it more efficient and sustainable.  
• Bio-Manufacturing of Food: Biological processes could be used to produce food and ingredients, reducing reliance on traditional agriculture and minimizing environmental impact.

Important Considerations:

• Automation and Labor: The widespread adoption of automation in industries could lead to significant changes in the workforce. It will be crucial to ensure a just transition for workers and provide opportunities for retraining and upskilling.  
• Ethical Considerations: It’s essential to consider the ethical implications of these technologies and ensure they are used in a responsible way that benefits humanity and the planet.
• Global Collaboration: International cooperation and knowledge sharing will be crucial for developing and implementing sustainable technologies in industries around the world.

By embracing these sustainable technologies, industries in 2890 could become highly efficient, environmentally responsible, and contribute to a thriving future for all.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2890 ?

You’re asking about the cutting edge of future possibilities! Research and development for sustainable technology in 2890 would be a complex and multifaceted endeavor, building upon current scientific advancements and pushing the boundaries of what’s possible. Here’s a glimpse into potential R&D areas:

1. Fundamental Science:

• Advanced Physics: Research into areas like quantum physics, field theory, and even exploring the nature of spacetime itself could unlock new sources of energy, new forms of propulsion, and new ways to manipulate matter.
• Materials Science at the Atomic Level: Scientists might be able to design materials atom by atom, creating substances with unprecedented properties like perfect conductivity, self-healing capabilities, or even negative mass.
• Synthetic Biology & Bio-Engineering: R&D in synthetic biology could lead to the creation of microorganisms that can produce fuels, materials, or even medicines on demand. We might see the development of entirely new biological systems with unique functions.

2. Energy Technologies:

• Fusion Energy Breakthroughs: Continued R&D into fusion energy would focus on achieving stable and efficient fusion reactions, developing advanced materials for reactor construction, and creating efficient energy extraction systems.
• Harnessing Zero-Point Energy: This is highly speculative, but some researchers believe it might be possible to tap into the zero-point energy of the universe. This would require a fundamental shift in our understanding of physics.
• Advanced Energy Storage: R&D would explore new energy storage mechanisms beyond batteries, such as using nanotechnology to store energy in the form of molecular vibrations or developing supercapacitors with vastly higher energy densities.

3. Materials and Manufacturing:

• Programmable Matter: Scientists would strive to create truly programmable matter that can change its properties on demand. This would revolutionize manufacturing, allowing for the creation of dynamic products and infrastructure.
• Bio-Integrated Materials: R&D would focus on creating bio-integrated materials with a wider range of functionalities, such as materials that can self-assemble, self-heal, or even respond to their environment.
• Nanotechnology for Manufacturing: Nanotechnology could be used to create tiny robots that can assemble products atom by atom, enabling highly precise and efficient manufacturing processes.

4. Resource Management and Environmental Remediation:

• Atmospheric Capture Technologies: R&D would focus on developing more efficient and cost-effective ways to capture carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, turning them into useful products.
• Advanced Recycling Technologies: Scientists might develop technologies that can break down materials into their constituent atoms, allowing for perfect recycling and reuse of resources.
• Geoengineering: If necessary, R&D could explore geoengineering techniques to mitigate climate change, such as solar radiation management or carbon cycle modification.

5. Artificial Intelligence and Robotics:

• AI for Scientific Discovery: AI could be used to analyze vast amounts of data and identify patterns that would be impossible for humans to see, accelerating scientific discovery in fields relevant to sustainable technology.  
• Autonomous Research Labs: Automated research labs, powered by AI and robotics, could conduct experiments and analyze data much faster than human scientists, accelerating the pace of R&D.  
• AI for System Optimization: AI could be used to optimize complex systems like energy grids, transportation networks, and even global supply chains, making them more efficient and sustainable.

6. Biotechnology and Biomimicry:

• Synthetic Biology for Sustainability: R&D in synthetic biology could lead to the creation of microorganisms that can produce biofuels, bioplastics, or other sustainable products.
• Biomimicry for Technological Innovation: Scientists would continue to study nature’s designs and processes to inspire new sustainable technologies, from energy-efficient materials to self-healing structures.

7. Space Exploration and Resource Utilization:

• Advanced Propulsion Systems: R&D into advanced propulsion systems, such as warp drives or other theoretical technologies, could make space travel more efficient and enable the exploration of distant star systems.
• In-Situ Resource Utilization: Technologies would be developed to extract resources from asteroids, planets, and other celestial bodies, enabling sustainable space colonization and reducing reliance on Earth’s resources.

Important Considerations:

• Interdisciplinary Collaboration: R&D in sustainable technology would require collaboration between scientists from many different disciplines, including physics, chemistry, biology, engineering, and computer science.  
• Ethical Considerations: It’s crucial to consider the ethical implications of these technologies and ensure they are used in a responsible way that benefits humanity and the planet.
• Global Cooperation: International collaboration and knowledge sharing would be essential for accelerating the pace of R&D and ensuring that sustainable technologies are accessible to all.

The research and development of sustainable technology in 2890 would be a grand and ambitious undertaking, pushing the boundaries of human knowledge and ingenuity. By investing in these areas, we can create a future where technology empowers us to live in harmony with our planet and build a thriving civilization for generations to come.Sources and related content

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

References

^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r} Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u} Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.

^ Jump up to:^a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.

^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.

^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.

^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.

^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Jump up to:^a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.

^ Jump up to:^a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.

^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.

^ Jump up to:^a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h i} Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.

^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.

^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.

^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.

^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.

^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.

^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.

^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.

^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.

^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.

^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.

^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.

^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.

^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.

^ Jump up to:^a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher

^ Jump up to:^a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)

^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.

^ Jump up to:^a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.

^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.

^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.

^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.

^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.

^ Jump up to:^a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972

^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.

^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.

^ Jump up to:^a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.

^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.

^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.

^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)

^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.

^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals

^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.

^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.

^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.

^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.

^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.

^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.

^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.

^ Jump up to:^a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.

^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.

^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.

^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.

^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.

^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.

^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.

^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.

^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.

^ Jump up to:^a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC

^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.

^ Jump up to:^a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.

^ Jump up to:^a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.

^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}

^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine

^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.

^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.

^ Jump up to:^a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.

^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.

^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.

^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB

^ Jump up to:^a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.

^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.

^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.

^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.

^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.

^ Jump up to:^a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.

^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.

^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.

^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.

^ Jump up to:^a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.

^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.

^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.

^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.

^ Jump up to:^a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.

^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.

^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.

^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.

^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.

^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.

^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.

^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.

^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.

^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.

^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.

^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.

^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.

^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.

^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.

^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.