Sustainable Technology of 2820

Leave a Comment / Blog / By

Sustainable Technology of 2820 ?

Sustainable technology in 2820 is difficult to predict with certainty, but it is likely to be highly advanced and integrated into all aspects of life. Some possible developments include:

  • Renewable energy: Solar, wind, and other renewable energy sources will likely be the primary source of energy. Advanced energy storage technologies will be developed to ensure a reliable supply of energy.
  • Sustainable transportation: Electric vehicles and other forms of sustainable transportation will be widely used. Advanced traffic management systems will be developed to reduce congestion and emissions.  
  • Sustainable agriculture: Precision agriculture and other sustainable farming practices will be used to increase food production while minimizing environmental impact.  
  • Circular economy: The circular economy will be widely adopted, with products designed for disassembly and reuse. Waste will be minimized and resources will be used more efficiently.
  • Artificial intelligence: AI will be used to optimize resource use and make decisions that promote sustainability.  
  • Biotechnology: Biotechnology will be used to develop new materials and products that are sustainable and environmentally friendly.  

Overall, sustainable technology in 2820 is likely to be highly advanced and integrated into all aspects of life. It will play a key role in addressing the challenges of climate change and resource depletion.

What is Sustainable Technology of 2820 ?

Predicting the exact nature of sustainable technology in 2820 is a fascinating thought experiment! While we can’t know for sure, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and potential advancements. Here are some possibilities:

1. Hyper-Efficient Renewable Energy Systems:

  • Space-based Solar Power: Imagine massive solar arrays in orbit, beaming clean energy down to Earth with incredible efficiency.  
  • Advanced Fusion Reactors: If fusion energy becomes viable, it could provide a near-limitless source of clean power.  
  • Ambient Energy Harvesting: Perhaps we’ll have technologies that can capture energy from the environment itself – vibrations, heat, even radio waves – at a usable scale.

2. Closed-Loop Resource Systems:

  • Molecular Recycling: Imagine technologies that can break down any material into its basic building blocks, allowing for perfect recycling and reuse.
  • 3D Printing with Recycled Materials: Advanced 3D printing could use these recycled materials to create anything from tools to buildings on demand, minimizing waste.
  • Vertical Farms and Aquaponics: Cities could have self-contained ecosystems for food production, combining agriculture and aquaculture in efficient, space-saving ways.

3. Biologically Inspired Technologies:

  • Bio-integrated Electronics: Imagine devices that seamlessly merge with living organisms, monitoring health, and even repairing damage at a cellular level.
  • Engineered Ecosystems: We might be able to create artificial ecosystems that can purify water, clean the air, and even restore damaged environments.
  • Biomanufacturing: Using biological processes to create materials, fuels, and even medicines in a sustainable way.  

4. Smart and Adaptive Infrastructure:

  • Self-Healing Materials: Buildings and infrastructure that can repair themselves, extending their lifespan and reducing maintenance needs.  
  • Smart Grids: Energy systems that can dynamically adjust to demand, optimizing distribution and minimizing waste.  
  • Personalized Transportation: On-demand, autonomous vehicles that are powered by clean energy and optimized for efficiency.

5. AI-Powered Sustainability:

  • Predictive Modeling: AI could be used to predict resource needs, optimize energy use, and even anticipate environmental problems before they occur.  
  • Autonomous Systems: Robots and AI could manage resource extraction, recycling, and even environmental cleanup with minimal human intervention.  
  • Global Monitoring Networks: AI could analyze data from sensors around the world to track environmental changes and identify areas of concern.  

Challenges and Considerations:

  • Accessibility: Ensuring that these technologies are available to everyone, not just the wealthy, will be crucial for achieving true sustainability.
  • Ethical Implications: We’ll need to carefully consider the ethical implications of these technologies, especially those involving AI and genetic engineering.
  • Unforeseen Consequences: As with any technological advancement, there could be unintended consequences that we need to be prepared for.

While the exact nature of sustainable technology in 2820 remains a mystery, it’s clear that innovation will play a key role in creating a more sustainable future. By thinking creatively and responsibly, we can ensure that future generations have the resources they need to thrive.Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2820 ?

It’s more accurate to ask “Who will benefit from sustainable technology in 2820?” rather than “Who is required?” since sustainable technology, by its nature, aims to benefit everyone and everything. Here’s a breakdown of who would be positively impacted:

  • Humanity as a whole: This is the most obvious answer. Sustainable technology would ensure a habitable planet for future generations, with access to clean energy, resources, and a healthy environment. It would improve quality of life, reduce risks from environmental disasters, and potentially even enhance human capabilities through bio-integrated technologies.  
  • The environment: Sustainable technology would be crucial for preserving and restoring ecosystems, reducing pollution, and mitigating the effects of climate change. It would help protect biodiversity, ensure clean water and air, and maintain the delicate balance of nature.  
  • Other species: Sustainable technology would likely prioritize the well-being of all living creatures. It could involve developing new ways to coexist with nature, protecting endangered species, and even restoring damaged habitats.
  • Future generations: By definition, sustainable technology is about ensuring that future generations have the resources and a healthy planet they need to thrive. It’s about making responsible choices today that will benefit those who come after us.

It’s important to remember that sustainable technology is not just about solving problems; it’s about creating a world where those problems don’t arise in the first place. It’s about building a society that lives in harmony with nature and uses resources responsibly. In that sense, everyone has a stake in sustainable technology, and everyone will benefit from it.

However, there are also some specific groups who might have a greater need for sustainable technology in 2820:

  • People living in vulnerable regions: Those in areas prone to extreme weather events, resource scarcity, or environmental degradation would rely heavily on sustainable technology for survival and resilience.
  • Marginalized communities: Access to clean energy, clean water, and sustainable food production could be especially crucial for communities that are currently underserved or lack access to basic resources.  

Ultimately, the goal of sustainable technology in 2820 would be to create a world where everyone has the opportunity to live a healthy, fulfilling life, regardless of their location or background.Sources and related content

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2820 ?

That’s a very insightful question! It’s not just what sustainable technology will be in 2820, but when it will be needed. And the answer is: it’s needed now, and increasingly so as time goes on.

Here’s why:

  • The seeds of 2820 are sown today: The technology of 2820 won’t magically appear. It will be built upon the innovations and choices we make in the present. The research, development, and implementation of sustainable technologies need to start now to have a significant impact in the future.
  • Urgent environmental challenges: Climate change, resource depletion, pollution… these are not problems of the future, they are happening now. The longer we wait to adopt sustainable solutions, the more severe these problems will become, making it harder for future generations to cope.  
  • Building a sustainable mindset: Shifting towards a truly sustainable society requires a fundamental change in how we think about technology, consumption, and our relationship with the planet. This is a cultural shift that takes time and effort to cultivate. The sooner we start, the better.

So, while the most advanced and sophisticated sustainable technologies might be needed in 2820, the foundation for those technologies, and the need for sustainable practices in general, is required today.

Think of it like planting a tree. You might not see its full size and grandeur for decades, but you need to plant the seed now to ensure it grows. Similarly, we need to invest in sustainable technology now to ensure a thriving future for generations to come.

It’s not just about future needs, it’s about our responsibility to act now and create a world where sustainable technology is not just an option, but the very foundation of our civilization.

courtesy : NPTEL-NOC IITM

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2820 ?

That’s a great question that gets to the heart of why sustainable technology is so important! While sustainable technology in 2820 would ideally benefit the entire planet, there are certain areas and situations where it would be especially crucial:

1. Regions facing environmental challenges:

  • Areas vulnerable to climate change: Coastal regions threatened by rising sea levels, arid regions facing desertification, and areas prone to extreme weather events would rely heavily on sustainable technology for resilience and adaptation. Think of advanced flood control systems, drought-resistant agriculture, and climate-resilient infrastructure.
  • Resource-scarce regions: Areas with limited access to fresh water, fertile land, or essential minerals would need sustainable technology to ensure basic needs are met. This could involve advanced water purification systems, vertical farms, and closed-loop resource management.
  • Polluted or degraded environments: Regions suffering from industrial pollution, deforestation, or soil erosion would require sustainable technology for remediation and restoration. This might include advanced air and water filtration systems, bioremediation techniques, and ecological restoration projects.

2. Communities with specific needs:

  • Developing nations: Sustainable technology could help these communities leapfrog traditional, polluting technologies and build a sustainable foundation for their economies. This could involve off-grid renewable energy solutions, sustainable agriculture practices, and access to clean water and sanitation.
  • Urban centers: Cities, with their high population density and consumption patterns, would need sustainable technology to manage resources efficiently and minimize their environmental footprint. This could involve smart grids, sustainable transportation systems, and waste management solutions.  
  • Remote or isolated communities: Sustainable technology could help these communities become self-sufficient and reduce their reliance on external resources. This could involve renewable energy microgrids, local food production systems, and telemedicine technologies.

3. Critical sectors:

  • Energy sector: The transition to 100% renewable energy would be essential, requiring advancements in solar, wind, and other clean energy sources, as well as energy storage and distribution technologies.
  • Food and agriculture: Sustainable technology would be needed to increase food production while minimizing environmental impact, ensuring food security for a growing population. This could involve precision agriculture, vertical farming, and sustainable aquaculture.  
  • Manufacturing and industry: Sustainable technology would be crucial for developing closed-loop manufacturing processes, reducing waste, and using resources more efficiently. This could involve molecular recycling, 3D printing with recycled materials, and biomanufacturing.  

Ultimately, sustainable technology in 2820 would be needed wherever there is a need to protect the environment, conserve resources, and ensure a healthy and equitable future for all. It would be a global effort, with technologies tailored to specific needs and contexts, but with the common goal of creating a sustainable civilization.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2820 ?

You’re asking about the mechanisms by which sustainable technology will be essential in 2820. Here’s how it will be “required,” not in a dictatorial sense, but in a way that reflects the needs of a thriving society:

1. To Replenish Depleted Resources:

  • Circular Economy: By 2820, we’ll likely have perfected the circular economy. This means technology will be required to not just recycle, but to repurpose and regenerate resources. Imagine systems that can break down waste into its basic molecular components and then use those components to create new materials, products, even food.
  • Resource Optimization: AI and advanced sensors will be essential for monitoring resource usage in real-time, identifying areas of waste, and automatically adjusting systems to optimize efficiency. This will be crucial for managing everything from water and energy to rare earth minerals.

2. To Mitigate Environmental Damage:

  • Climate Change Adaptation: Even with centuries of effort, some effects of climate change may persist. Technology will be required to protect vulnerable communities, manage rising sea levels, and even potentially geoengineer the atmosphere to maintain a stable climate.  
  • Ecosystem Restoration: Sustainable technology won’t just prevent damage, it will be used to actively heal the planet. This could involve using biotechnology to restore damaged ecosystems, deploying advanced sensors to monitor environmental health, and even developing new ways to remove pollutants from the air and water.

3. To Support a Growing Population:

  • Sustainable Food Production: With a potentially larger population in 2820, technology will be required to produce food sustainably and efficiently. This could involve vertical farms, precision agriculture, and even lab-grown meat to reduce reliance on traditional agriculture.
  • Clean Energy Infrastructure: Providing clean and reliable energy for everyone will be a major challenge. Technology will be required to develop and maintain advanced renewable energy systems, energy storage solutions, and smart grids to ensure everyone has access to power.

4. To Enhance Human Well-being:

  • Healthcare Advances: Sustainable technology will play a role in healthcare, with advancements in areas like telemedicine, bio-integrated devices, and personalized medicine. This will help ensure that everyone has access to quality healthcare, regardless of their location or background.  
  • Sustainable Cities: Cities of the future will need to be designed with sustainability in mind. Technology will be required to create smart infrastructure, manage resources efficiently, and ensure that cities are livable and resilient.  

5. To Maintain Balance and Harmony:

  • AI for Sustainability: AI will be crucial for analyzing vast amounts of data, identifying patterns, and making decisions that promote sustainability. This could involve optimizing resource allocation, predicting environmental risks, and even developing new sustainable technologies.
  • Global Cooperation: Sustainable technology will require global cooperation and knowledge sharing. Technology will be needed to facilitate communication, collaboration, and the dissemination of sustainable practices across the world.  

In essence, sustainable technology in 2820 will be required to ensure the long-term survival and well-being of humanity and the planet. It will be woven into the fabric of society, providing the foundation for a thriving and harmonious future.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2820 ?

It’s impossible to provide a real case study of sustainable technology in 2820, as that’s far in the future. However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on current trends and potential advancements, which can be a valuable thought experiment.

Hypothetical Case Study: The Revitalization of the Amazon Rainforest in 2820

Context: By the early 22nd century, despite significant efforts, the Amazon rainforest had suffered extensive damage due to deforestation, climate change, and unsustainable agricultural practices. Large swathes were degraded, impacting biodiversity and global climate patterns.  

The 2820 Solution: A multi-pronged sustainable technology initiative, “Amazonia Rises,” was implemented, combining several key innovations:

  • Bio-Integrated Sensor Networks: Nanobots and microscopic sensors, powered by ambient energy harvesting, were deployed throughout the rainforest. These formed a vast, interconnected network that monitored everything from soil health and water quality to individual tree growth and animal populations. This real-time data provided a comprehensive understanding of the ecosystem’s health.
  • AI-Powered Ecosystem Management: A sophisticated AI, “Gaia,” analyzed the data from the sensor network and developed tailored restoration plans for different areas. Gaia could predict the optimal conditions for reforestation, identify areas vulnerable to disease, and even manage water resources to prevent droughts.
  • Drone-Based Reforestation: Autonomous drones, powered by advanced biofuel cells, were used to plant native tree species in degraded areas. These drones could identify the ideal planting locations based on Gaia’s analysis and even deliver targeted nutrients to help the saplings thrive. They also dispersed beneficial microorganisms to revitalize the soil.
  • Biomanufactured Materials: Biodegradable, biomanufactured materials were used to create temporary structures and support systems for the newly planted trees, protecting them from harsh weather conditions and promoting their growth. These materials were designed to decompose naturally, enriching the soil as they did so.
  • Symbiotic Agriculture: Local communities were empowered with sustainable agriculture technologies based on symbiotic relationships between plants and microorganisms. This involved techniques like agroforestry, where trees and crops are grown together, and the use of biofertilizers to enhance soil fertility naturally. This provided sustainable livelihoods for local populations and reduced pressure on the remaining rainforest.
  • Climate Engineering Interventions: To address the ongoing impacts of climate change, localized climate engineering techniques were employed. These might have included solar radiation management at a micro-scale to protect vulnerable areas from extreme heat or cloud seeding to increase rainfall in drought-stricken regions. These interventions were carefully monitored and controlled by Gaia to minimize any unintended consequences.

Results: By 2820, the Amazon rainforest had undergone a remarkable revitalization. Biodiversity had rebounded, carbon sequestration had increased significantly, and the region’s climate had stabilized. Local communities were thriving, benefiting from the restored ecosystem and sustainable economic opportunities. The Amazonia Rises project became a global model for ecosystem restoration and demonstrated the power of sustainable technology to heal the planet.

Key Takeaways:

  • Integration: The success of the project relied on the integration of multiple sustainable technologies, working together in a synergistic way.
  • Data-Driven Decisions: The real-time data provided by the sensor network and analyzed by AI was crucial for making informed decisions about restoration efforts.
  • Local Empowerment: Engaging local communities and empowering them with sustainable technologies was essential for the long-term success of the project.
  • Adaptive Management: The project was constantly adapting and evolving based on the data and feedback from the ecosystem, demonstrating the importance of adaptive management in sustainable technology initiatives.

This hypothetical case study illustrates how a combination of advanced technologies, ecological understanding, and community involvement could be used to achieve significant environmental restoration in the future. It’s a glimpse into the potential of sustainable technology to create a healthier and more balanced world.

courtesy : Bernard Marr

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2820 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 2820: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract: This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 2820. Building upon current trends and extrapolating future advancements, it envisions a world where technology is seamlessly integrated with natural systems, fostering a harmonious balance between human progress and planetary well-being. It examines key areas of innovation, potential challenges, and the ethical considerations necessary for realizing this vision.

1. Introduction:

The 29th century presents both immense challenges and unprecedented opportunities. Climate change, resource depletion, and a growing global population demand innovative solutions. This paper posits that sustainable technology will be the cornerstone of civilization in 2820, enabling humanity to not just survive, but thrive. It will be characterized by hyper-efficiency, closed-loop systems, biological integration, and intelligent automation.

2. Key Areas of Innovation:

2.1. Energy:

  • Space-Based Solar Power: Massive orbital solar arrays collect and beam clean energy to Earth, providing a near-limitless supply.
  • Advanced Fusion Energy: Fusion reactors, if realized, offer another source of clean, abundant power.
  • Ambient Energy Harvesting: Nanotechnology allows for the capture of energy from the environment – vibrations, thermal gradients, even radio waves – at a usable scale.

2.2. Resource Management:

  • Molecular Recycling: Technologies capable of breaking down any material into its constituent atoms and molecules enable perfect recycling and resource regeneration.
  • 3D Printing with Recycled Materials: On-demand manufacturing using recycled resources minimizes waste and optimizes production.
  • Closed-Loop Resource Systems: Cities and industries operate on closed-loop principles, minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization.

2.3. Food and Agriculture:

  • Vertical Farms and Aquaponics: Urban-integrated, high-yield vertical farms and aquaponic systems provide fresh, local produce, reducing transportation needs and land use.
  • Precision Agriculture: AI-powered precision agriculture optimizes resource use, minimizes environmental impact, and maximizes crop yields.
  • Cultivated Meat and Protein: Lab-grown meat and alternative protein sources reduce reliance on traditional animal agriculture.

2.4. Environment and Ecosystems:

  • Geoengineering and Climate Mitigation: Advanced geoengineering techniques, carefully monitored and controlled, help mitigate the effects of climate change.
  • Ecosystem Restoration Technologies: Biotechnology and AI are used to restore damaged ecosystems, enhance biodiversity, and protect endangered species.
  • Bioremediation: Microorganisms and engineered biological systems are used to clean up pollution and restore degraded environments.

2.5. Information and Communication:

  • Global Sensor Networks: Vast networks of interconnected sensors monitor environmental conditions, resource usage, and ecosystem health in real-time.
  • AI-Driven Analytics: Sophisticated AI systems analyze data from these networks, providing insights and predictions to optimize resource management and environmental protection.
  • Decentralized Information Systems: Secure, decentralized networks ensure access to information and facilitate global collaboration on sustainability initiatives.

3. Challenges and Considerations:

  • Technological Feasibility: Many of the technologies described are still in early stages of development. Significant research and investment will be required to bring them to fruition.
  • Scalability: Scaling up these technologies to meet the needs of a global population will be a major challenge.
  • Ethical Implications: The use of advanced technologies, particularly AI and geoengineering, raises ethical questions that must be carefully considered.
  • Social Equity: Ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies is crucial to avoid exacerbating existing inequalities.
  • Unforeseen Consequences: As with any technological advancement, there could be unintended consequences that we need to be prepared for.

4. The Path Forward:

Realizing this vision of sustainable technology in 2820 requires a concerted effort from researchers, policymakers, and the public. Key steps include:

  • Investing in Research and Development: Prioritizing research in key areas of sustainable technology.
  • Promoting International Collaboration: Fostering global cooperation on research, development, and deployment of sustainable technologies.
  • Developing Ethical Frameworks: Establishing clear ethical guidelines for the development and use of advanced technologies.
  • Educating and Engaging the Public: Raising awareness about the importance of sustainability and empowering individuals to make informed choices.

5. Conclusion:

Sustainable technology holds the key to a thriving future for humanity. By embracing innovation, addressing the challenges, and acting responsibly, we can create a world where technology and nature coexist in harmony, ensuring a healthy planet for generations to come. The journey to 2820 begins today.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2820 ?

It’s exciting to imagine the industrial applications of sustainable technology in 2820! Here are some possibilities, keeping in mind that these are extrapolations from current trends and potential future breakthroughs:

1. Hyper-Efficient Manufacturing:

  • Molecular Recycling and Repurposing: Imagine factories that don’t just recycle, but actually break down discarded products and materials into their basic molecular building blocks. These building blocks could then be used to create entirely new products, on demand, with minimal waste. This would revolutionize manufacturing, making it truly circular and resource-efficient.
  • 3D Printing at the Atomic Level: Advanced 3D printing could allow for the creation of objects with incredible precision, even down to the atomic level. This would enable the manufacturing of highly customized and complex products with minimal material waste. Imagine creating tools, machines, or even buildings layer by layer, using only the exact amount of material needed.  
  • Biomanufacturing: Factories could utilize biological processes to create materials, fuels, and even pharmaceuticals. Imagine growing materials like plastics or fabrics using engineered microorganisms, reducing our reliance on fossil fuels and traditional manufacturing processes.

2. Energy Production and Distribution:

  • Space-Based Solar Power: Massive solar arrays in orbit could beam clean energy down to Earth, providing a near-limitless supply. This would power entire industries without contributing to pollution or climate change.
  • Advanced Fusion Reactors: If fusion energy becomes a reality, it could provide another source of clean, abundant power for industrial use. Imagine factories powered by fusion reactors, producing goods without any carbon emissions.
  • Smart Grids and Microgrids: Intelligent energy grids could optimize energy distribution and minimize waste. Industries could operate on microgrids, powered by a combination of renewable energy sources and energy storage systems, ensuring a reliable and sustainable power supply.  

3. Resource Management:

  • Automated Resource Extraction: AI-powered robots and autonomous vehicles could be used to extract resources from the Earth in a sustainable way, minimizing environmental impact and ensuring responsible resource management.  
  • Closed-Loop Water Systems: Industries could operate on closed-loop water systems, recycling and reusing water endlessly. This would be crucial in regions with limited water resources, ensuring that industries can operate sustainably without depleting local water supplies.
  • Waste-to-Energy Systems: Advanced waste management facilities could convert waste into energy, reducing landfill waste and providing a source of clean power for industries.

4. Transportation and Logistics:

  • Autonomous Electric Vehicles: Factories and warehouses could be operated by fleets of autonomous electric vehicles, powered by clean energy. This would improve efficiency, reduce transportation costs, and eliminate emissions from industrial transportation.
  • Hyperloop and Maglev Trains: High-speed transportation systems like hyperloops or maglev trains could be used to transport goods and materials quickly and efficiently between factories and distribution centers, reducing transportation times and minimizing environmental impact.

5. Environmental Remediation:

  • Bioremediation Technologies: Industries could use bioremediation technologies to clean up pollution and restore damaged environments. This could involve using microorganisms or engineered biological systems to break down pollutants and neutralize harmful substances.
  • Carbon Capture and Storage: Industries could implement carbon capture and storage technologies to capture carbon dioxide emissions from their operations and store them safely underground, reducing their carbon footprint.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology could revolutionize industries in 2820. The key is that these technologies would not only make industries more efficient and productive, but also ensure that they operate in a way that is environmentally responsible and sustainable for the long term.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2820 ?

It’s fascinating to consider the research and development that would be necessary to bring about the sustainable technologies of 2820! Here’s a glimpse into the potential areas of focus:

1. Fundamental Science:

  • Advanced Materials Science:
    • Self-healing materials: Developing materials that can repair themselves, extending their lifespan and reducing waste.  
    • Adaptive materials: Creating materials that can change their properties in response to environmental stimuli, for example, adjusting to temperature or pressure changes.  
    • Lightweight, ultra-strong materials: Researching new materials that are incredibly strong yet lightweight, for use in transportation, construction, and even space-based infrastructure.
  • Energy Physics:
    • Fusion energy breakthroughs: Continued research into fusion energy to make it a viable and efficient source of clean power.
    • Exotic energy sources: Exploring more unconventional energy sources, such as zero-point energy or tapping into other dimensions (though these are highly speculative).
    • Advanced energy storage: Developing highly efficient and long-lasting energy storage solutions to ensure a reliable supply of renewable energy.
  • Nanotechnology:
    • Molecular manufacturing: Refining nanotechnology to the point where we can manipulate individual atoms and molecules to build materials and devices with incredible precision.
    • Ambient energy harvesting: Developing nanoscale devices that can capture and convert energy from the environment, such as vibrations, heat, or even radio waves.
    • Bio-integrated devices: Creating nanoscale devices that can seamlessly integrate with living organisms, for medical monitoring, treatment, or even enhancement.

2. Engineering and Technology:

  • Artificial Intelligence:
    • AI for sustainability: Developing AI systems that can analyze vast amounts of data to optimize resource use, predict environmental risks, and design sustainable technologies.  
    • Autonomous systems: Creating robots and AI that can manage resource extraction, recycling, and environmental cleanup with minimal human intervention.
    • Global monitoring networks: Building AI-powered systems that can analyze data from sensors around the world to track environmental changes and identify areas of concern.
  • Biotechnology:
    • Biomanufacturing: Using biological processes to create materials, fuels, and even medicines in a sustainable way.
    • Engineered ecosystems: Developing artificial ecosystems that can purify water, clean the air, and even restore damaged environments.
    • Synthetic biology: Creating new biological systems with specific functions, such as microorganisms that can break down pollutants or produce biofuels.
  • Space Technology:
    • Space-based solar power: Designing and building massive solar arrays in orbit to collect and beam clean energy to Earth.
    • Space resource utilization: Developing technologies to extract resources from asteroids or other celestial bodies in a sustainable way.
    • Space-based manufacturing: Building factories in space to take advantage of the unique conditions there, such as zero gravity or extreme temperatures.

3. Interdisciplinary Research:

  • Systems thinking: Developing a deeper understanding of how different systems interact, from ecosystems to social systems, to create holistic solutions to sustainability challenges.
  • Socio-technical research: Studying the complex interplay between technology and society to ensure that sustainable technologies are developed and implemented in a way that is equitable and beneficial for all.
  • Futures studies: Using foresight techniques to anticipate future challenges and opportunities, and to guide research and development efforts towards a sustainable future.

4. Ethical Considerations:

  • Responsible innovation: Developing ethical frameworks for the development and use of advanced technologies, particularly AI and biotechnology.
  • Social equity: Ensuring that sustainable technologies are accessible to everyone, not just the wealthy, and that they benefit all of humanity.
  • Environmental stewardship: Recognizing our responsibility to protect the planet and future generations, and making ethical choices about how we use technology.  

The research and development of sustainable technology in 2820 would be a massive undertaking, requiring collaboration across disciplines and across nations. It would be driven by a deep commitment to creating a better future for all, and a recognition that technology can be a powerful tool for achieving sustainability.Sources and related content

COURTESY :Accenture

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
  53. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
  77. ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
  96. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
  107. ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »