Sustainable Technology of 2810

Leave a Comment / Sustainable Technology of 2810 / By
84 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

Sustainable Technology of 2810 ?

Technium Sustainability is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal that publishes articles on sustainable technology. It is published by Technium and has an ISSN of 2810-2991. The journal covers a wide range of topics related to sustainable technology, including renewable energy, energy efficiency, waste management, and sustainable agriculture.  

What is Sustainable Technology of 2810 ?

Unfortunately, there is no widely recognized or established concept of “Sustainable Technology of 2810”. It’s possible this term refers to a very specific concept within a niche field, or perhaps it’s a concept that is still under development or hasn’t gained widespread recognition.

However, we can speculate on what sustainable technology might look like in the year 2810 based on current trends and advancements:

  • Advanced Energy Systems: By 2810, we might have mastered fusion energy, or perhaps developed even more exotic and efficient energy sources. Energy harvesting from the environment, such as solar, wind, and geothermal, would likely be highly advanced and integrated into our infrastructure.
  • Closed-Loop Resource Systems: The concept of a circular economy would be fully realized, with closed-loop systems for resource management. Waste would be virtually eliminated, with materials being continuously recycled and reused.
  • Biotechnology and Biomimicry: We might see extensive use of biotechnology and biomimicry to create sustainable materials, processes, and products. Imagine self-healing infrastructure inspired by biological systems, or biodegradable plastics produced from renewable resources.
  • Advanced Materials Science: Materials science would likely have advanced significantly, with the development of new materials with exceptional properties, such as super strength, self-repair, and biodegradability.
  • Artificial Intelligence and Automation: AI and automation would play a crucial role in optimizing resource use, managing energy systems, and developing sustainable solutions.  
  • Space-Based Technologies: With increased space exploration and colonization, space-based technologies could contribute to sustainability on Earth. For example, asteroid mining could provide access to resources, and space-based solar power could provide clean energy.  

It’s important to remember that this is just speculation. The actual sustainable technologies of 2810 could be very different from what we can imagine today. However, by continuing to innovate and prioritize sustainability, we can ensure a brighter future for generations to come.

If you have any other information about “Sustainable Technology of 2810”, please provide it, and I’ll do my best to assist you further.Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2810 ?

It’s interesting to think about who might “require” sustainable technology in the distant future of 2810! Here’s a breakdown of who might depend on it, and why:

  • Human Civilization: By 2810, sustainable technology would likely be absolutely essential for the survival and well-being of human civilization. This is because:
    • Resource Depletion: If we continue current consumption patterns, many resources will be scarce or depleted. Sustainable tech will be needed for resource management, recycling, and finding alternatives.
    • Environmental Degradation: Climate change, pollution, and ecosystem damage will likely worsen without drastic changes. Sustainable tech will be crucial for mitigation and adaptation.
    • Population Growth: Even if population growth slows, there will likely be a massive global population. Sustainable tech will be needed to provide food, water, energy, and shelter for everyone.
  • Future Generations: Those living in 2810 and beyond will inherit the consequences of our actions today. They will require sustainable technology to live in a healthy and thriving world.
  • Ecosystems: The natural world will also “require” sustainable technology.
    • Biodiversity: Protecting and restoring biodiversity will depend on sustainable practices that minimize human impact on the environment.
    • Planetary Health: The overall health of the planet – its atmosphere, oceans, land – will require sustainable solutions to maintain balance and support life.
  • Industries and Economies: In 2810, industries and economies will likely be entirely reliant on sustainable technology. This won’t just be an ethical choice, but a necessity:
    • Resource Scarcity: Businesses will need sustainable tech to access and utilize resources efficiently.
    • Consumer Demand: Consumers will likely demand sustainable products and services.
    • Regulations: Strong environmental regulations will likely require businesses to adopt sustainable practices.

In essence, by 2810, sustainable technology will be less of an option and more of a fundamental requirement for life as we know it. It will be woven into every aspect of society, from how we power our homes to how we grow our food and how we interact with the natural world.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2810 ?

This is a fascinating question! It gets at the heart of why we need to be thinking about sustainable technology now, even though the year 2810 seems far off. Here’s a breakdown of when sustainable technology is required, and the urgency behind it:

  • Now (Absolutely Required): This is the most crucial time. We need sustainable technology right now to:
    • Prevent further environmental damage: Climate change, pollution, and resource depletion are already causing significant problems. We need sustainable solutions to mitigate these issues and prevent them from worsening.  
    • Ensure a livable future: The decisions we make today will have a profound impact on the future. We need to act now to ensure a healthy planet and a good quality of life for future generations.
    • Transition to a sustainable society: Shifting to sustainable practices requires time and investment. The sooner we start, the smoother and more effective the transition will be.  
  • The Near Future (Critically Important): In the coming decades, sustainable technology will become even more critical as:
    • Resources become scarcer: As the global population grows and consumption increases, resources like water, energy, and raw materials will become more scarce. Sustainable technology will be essential for managing these resources efficiently.  
    • Climate change impacts intensify: The effects of climate change, such as extreme weather events and sea-level rise, will likely become more severe. Sustainable technology will be needed to adapt to these changes and protect vulnerable communities.  
  • The Distant Future (Essential for Survival): By the time we reach 2810, sustainable technology will likely be absolutely essential for human survival and well-being. This is because:
    • The cumulative effects of environmental damage: The environmental problems we face today will likely have compounded over time. Sustainable technology will be needed to address these long-term challenges.
    • The need for long-term solutions: Many of the challenges we face, such as climate change and resource depletion, require long-term solutions. Sustainable technology will be crucial for creating a truly sustainable future.  

In short, the need for sustainable technology is not something we can postpone. It is a pressing issue that demands our attention and action today. By investing in sustainable technology now, we can create a better future for ourselves and for generations to come.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2810 ?

The need for sustainable technology in 2810 (and, importantly, now to get there) won’t be confined to any single location. It will be a global, interconnected necessity. Here’s a breakdown of where it will be required:

  • Everywhere on Earth: Sustainable technology will be crucial in all regions of the planet, from densely populated urban centers to remote rural areas. This includes:
    • Cities: Sustainable urban planning, transportation, energy systems, waste management, and food production will be essential for making cities livable and resource-efficient.
    • Rural Areas: Sustainable agriculture, water management, and resource extraction will be crucial for supporting rural communities and preserving natural ecosystems.  
    • Oceans: Sustainable fishing practices, ocean cleanup technologies, and protection of marine ecosystems will be vital for maintaining the health of our oceans.  
    • Atmosphere: Technologies to mitigate climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and potentially even removing existing CO2 from the atmosphere will be required globally.
  • Beyond Earth (If Human Presence Expands): If humanity has expanded its presence beyond Earth by 2810, sustainable technology will be even more critical:
    • Space Habitats: Closed-loop life support systems, resource recycling, and sustainable energy sources will be essential for long-term space habitation.  
    • Other Planets/Celestial Bodies: If we are mining or even terraforming other planets, sustainable practices will be crucial to minimize environmental impact and ensure long-term viability.
  • Infrastructure and Industry: Sustainable technology will need to be integrated into all aspects of our infrastructure and industry:
    • Energy Systems: Sustainable energy generation (solar, wind, fusion, etc.) and distribution networks will be fundamental.
    • Transportation: Sustainable transportation systems, including electric vehicles, high-speed rail, and potentially even more advanced technologies, will be needed to move people and goods efficiently and with minimal environmental impact.
    • Manufacturing: Sustainable manufacturing processes that minimize waste, use renewable resources, and reduce pollution will be essential.  
    • Agriculture: Sustainable agriculture practices will be needed to feed a growing population while minimizing environmental impact and preserving biodiversity.
  • Homes and Communities: Sustainable technology will also be needed at the individual and community level:
    • Smart Homes: Energy-efficient appliances, smart home management systems, and water conservation technologies will help reduce resource consumption.  
    • Sustainable Communities: Communities designed for walkability, public transportation, and shared resources will promote sustainable living.  

In essence, by 2810, sustainable technology will need to be seamlessly integrated into every facet of human life, everywhere on Earth (and potentially beyond), to ensure a thriving and equitable future. This is why the work towards these technologies needs to happen now, globally and collaboratively.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2810 ? 

It’s not just where sustainable technology will be needed in 2810, but how it will need to function and be integrated into society. Here’s a look at the key characteristics of how sustainable technology will likely be required:

  • Seamless Integration: By 2810, sustainable technology won’t be a separate add-on, but rather an integral part of all systems and processes. It will be woven into the fabric of everyday life, from how we power our homes to how we grow our food and how we travel.
  • Closed-Loop Systems: Resource management will be based on closed-loop systems, where waste is minimized and materials are continuously recycled and reused. This will require advanced technologies for material recovery, processing, and manufacturing.  
  • Localized and Decentralized: While some large-scale infrastructure will still be necessary, there will likely be a greater emphasis on localized and decentralized systems. This could include community-based energy generation, local food production, and distributed water management.
  • Adaptive and Resilient: Sustainable technology will need to be adaptive and resilient to changing environmental conditions. This is especially important in the face of climate change, which is likely to bring more extreme weather events and other challenges.
  • Powered by Renewable Energy: The vast majority of energy will need to come from renewable sources, such as solar, wind, geothermal, and potentially fusion. Sustainable technology will be needed to efficiently capture, store, and distribute this energy.
  • Driven by AI and Automation: Artificial intelligence and automation will play a key role in optimizing resource use, managing energy systems, and developing sustainable solutions. This will require advanced AI algorithms and robotics that are designed with sustainability in mind.  
  • Biologically Inspired: Biomimicry, the practice of imitating nature’s designs and processes, will likely be a major source of inspiration for sustainable technology. We may see self-healing materials inspired by biological systems, or energy-efficient processes inspired by natural phenomena.  
  • Socially Equitable: Sustainable technology will need to be developed and deployed in a way that is socially equitable, ensuring that everyone has access to the benefits of a sustainable society. This will require careful consideration of issues such as affordability, accessibility, and environmental justice.
  • Constantly Evolving: Sustainable technology will need to be constantly evolving to meet new challenges and opportunities. This will require ongoing research and development, as well as a culture of innovation and adaptation.

In essence, by 2810, sustainable technology will need to be more than just a collection of individual technologies. It will need to be a comprehensive and integrated system that supports a thriving and equitable society while preserving the health of the planet.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2810 ?

It’s impossible to provide a real case study of sustainable technology in 2810. Case studies analyze existing situations. 2810 is far in the future, and we can only speculate. However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on current trends and reasonable extrapolations:

Hypothetical Case Study: The Revitalization of the Ganges Delta, 2810

Context: By the mid-21st century, the Ganges Delta, a region vital to hundreds of millions, faced severe challenges: rising sea levels, extreme weather events, saltwater intrusion, and overpopulation. Traditional infrastructure crumbled, and mass displacement threatened.

The 2810 Solution: A multi-pronged sustainable technology approach, developed over centuries, enabled the Delta’s revitalization.

  • Adaptive Infrastructure: “Bio-engineered” mangrove forests, enhanced with carbon-capturing polymers, formed a dynamic coastal defense system, naturally adapting to changing sea levels. Elevated, modular housing units, constructed from locally sourced, bio-degradable materials, were designed for rapid assembly and relocation as needed. These units incorporated integrated solar energy collection and water purification systems.
  • Regenerative Agriculture: Advanced hydroponic and aeroponic farms, powered by renewable energy, were established in previously unusable areas. These systems used minimal water and land, producing high yields of nutritious food. Genetically modified crops, designed for salt tolerance and enhanced nutrient uptake, were also deployed strategically.
  • Closed-Loop Water Management: A sophisticated network of water purification and recycling facilities ensured access to clean water. Desalination plants, powered by tidal energy, provided additional freshwater. Wastewater was treated and reused for irrigation and industrial purposes.
  • Decentralized Energy Systems: A combination of solar, wind, and tidal energy plants provided a stable and sustainable power supply. Smart grids managed energy distribution efficiently, prioritizing local consumption and minimizing transmission losses. Personal energy storage devices allowed individuals to manage their energy usage effectively.
  • AI-Driven Resource Optimization: An advanced AI system monitored environmental conditions, predicted weather patterns, and optimized resource allocation. It managed water distribution, adjusted energy production, and coordinated transportation systems to minimize waste and maximize efficiency.
  • Community-Based Governance: Local communities played a central role in managing resources and implementing sustainable practices. Decentralized decision-making empowered individuals and fostered a sense of ownership over the revitalization process.

Outcomes:

  • Resilient Ecosystem: The Ganges Delta ecosystem was restored, supporting a rich biodiversity and providing essential ecosystem services.
  • Thriving Communities: Communities were able to adapt to changing environmental conditions and thrive in a sustainable manner.
  • Food Security: The region achieved food security through sustainable agriculture and efficient resource management.
  • Clean Water Access: All residents had access to clean and safe drinking water.
  • Renewable Energy Independence: The region achieved energy independence through the use of renewable energy sources.

Lessons Learned (Hypothetical):

  • Long-term vision and sustained investment are essential for achieving sustainability.
  • Technological innovation must be combined with social and institutional change.
  • Community involvement is crucial for the success of sustainable development initiatives.
  • Adaptive and resilient systems are necessary to address the challenges of a changing world.

This hypothetical case study illustrates how a combination of advanced technologies, thoughtful planning, and community engagement could lead to a sustainable future, even in the face of significant challenges. It emphasizes the importance of starting the journey towards sustainability now so that such outcomes are possible in the future.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2810 ?

White Paper: Envisioning Sustainable Technology in 2810

Abstract:

Predicting the precise nature of technology centuries into the future is inherently speculative. However, by analyzing current trends, emerging technologies, and the escalating challenges of climate change and resource depletion, we can extrapolate a vision of sustainable technology in 2810. This white paper explores potential advancements in energy, materials science, biotechnology, AI, and other fields, outlining how these technologies might converge to create a truly sustainable civilization. It emphasizes the critical importance of prioritizing research, development, and implementation of these technologies today to ensure a viable future.

1. Introduction:

The year 2810 represents a significant temporal distance, making concrete predictions about technology challenging. However, the trajectory of current technological development, coupled with the urgent need to address global sustainability challenges, provides a basis for informed speculation. This paper posits that sustainable technology will not be a niche area but the foundation upon which all aspects of civilization are built.

2. Advanced Energy Systems:

By 2810, reliance on fossil fuels will be a distant memory. Several potential energy sources may dominate:

  • Fusion Energy: Controlled nuclear fusion, if achieved, could provide a virtually limitless source of clean energy.  
  • Advanced Solar: Highly efficient solar energy capture and conversion technologies, potentially including space-based solar power, will likely be widespread.
  • Geothermal and Tidal: Enhanced geothermal and tidal energy technologies will harness the Earth’s natural forces for sustainable power generation.
  • Ambient Energy Harvesting: Nanotechnology may enable the harvesting of energy from the environment, such as vibrations, heat, and even radio waves.  

3. Materials Science and Resource Management:

Sustainable materials and closed-loop resource systems will be essential:

  • Biodegradable and Recyclable Materials: Advanced bioplastics and other biodegradable materials will replace traditional plastics, minimizing waste and pollution.
  • Self-Healing Materials: Materials with the ability to self-repair will extend the lifespan of infrastructure and reduce maintenance needs.  
  • Advanced Recycling Technologies: Highly efficient recycling processes will recover valuable materials from waste streams, creating a circular economy.  
  • Resource Extraction from Space: Asteroid mining and other space-based resource extraction could supplement terrestrial resources.  

4. Biotechnology and Biomimicry:

Nature will serve as a blueprint for sustainable technologies:

  • Bio-Integrated Materials: Materials grown or engineered using biological processes will be used in construction, manufacturing, and other applications.
  • Bioremediation: Microorganisms will be used to clean up pollution and restore damaged ecosystems.
  • Biomimetic Systems: Technologies inspired by natural systems, such as self-regulating ecosystems, will be used to manage resources and infrastructure.

5. Artificial Intelligence and Automation:

AI and automation will play a critical role in optimizing sustainability:

  • Smart Grids: AI-powered smart grids will manage energy distribution efficiently, balancing supply and demand in real time.  
  • Precision Agriculture: AI-driven precision agriculture will optimize crop yields while minimizing water and fertilizer use.  
  • Automated Recycling Systems: Robotic systems will sort and process waste materials for recycling with high efficiency.  
  • Environmental Monitoring: AI-powered sensors will monitor environmental conditions, providing early warnings of potential problems.  

6. Societal and Ethical Considerations:

The development and deployment of sustainable technology in 2810 will require careful consideration of societal and ethical implications:

  • Equity and Access: Ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies for all members of society will be crucial.
  • Environmental Justice: Sustainable solutions must address environmental justice concerns, preventing disproportionate impacts on vulnerable communities.
  • Data Privacy and Security: The use of AI and other technologies will require robust data privacy and security measures.
  • Global Cooperation: International cooperation will be essential for addressing global sustainability challenges.

7. Conclusion:

The vision of sustainable technology in 2810 outlined in this white paper is ambitious but achievable. However, realizing this vision requires immediate and concerted action. Investing in research and development, fostering innovation, and promoting global cooperation are essential steps towards creating a sustainable future for all. The choices we make today will determine the world of 2810. We must choose wisely.Sources and related content

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2810 ?

It’s fascinating to consider the industrial applications of sustainable technology in 2810! Here are some potential scenarios, building upon current trends and extrapolating into the future:

1. Advanced Manufacturing and Resource Optimization:

  • Closed-Loop Production Systems: Factories will operate on closed-loop principles, with near-zero waste. Advanced recycling technologies will break down products at the end of their life, recovering materials for reuse in new production cycles.  
  • AI-Driven Process Optimization: AI systems will monitor and optimize every stage of the manufacturing process, from resource extraction to product assembly. This will minimize energy consumption, reduce material waste, and improve product quality.  
  • Localized Micro-Factories: Decentralized micro-factories, utilizing advanced 3D printing and additive manufacturing techniques, will produce goods on demand, reducing the need for long supply chains and minimizing transportation costs.  

2. Energy-Intensive Industries:

  • Sustainable Steel Production: Steel manufacturing, a traditionally energy-intensive industry, will rely on hydrogen produced from renewable energy sources. Carbon capture and utilization technologies may also be employed to further reduce emissions.
  • Advanced Cement Production: Cement production, another major source of greenhouse gas emissions, will utilize alternative materials and carbon-negative processes to minimize its environmental impact.
  • Renewable Energy Integration: Industries will be powered by a mix of renewable energy sources, including solar, wind, geothermal, and potentially fusion. Smart grids will manage energy distribution and ensure grid stability.  

3. Resource Extraction and Processing:

  • Sustainable Mining: Mining operations will employ advanced technologies to minimize environmental impact. This could include autonomous vehicles, AI-powered resource mapping, and in-situ resource extraction techniques.  
  • Space-Based Resource Acquisition: Asteroid mining and other space-based resource extraction methods could supplement terrestrial resources, reducing the pressure on Earth’s ecosystems.  
  • Advanced Material Processing: New materials with enhanced properties, such as super strength, self-healing capabilities, and biodegradability, will be developed and used in various industrial applications.

4. Agriculture and Food Production:

  • Vertical Farms and Urban Agriculture: Vertical farms and other forms of urban agriculture will become increasingly common, producing food in a controlled environment with minimal land and water use.
  • Precision Agriculture: AI-powered precision agriculture will optimize crop yields while minimizing water and fertilizer use.  
  • Sustainable Aquaculture: Sustainable aquaculture practices will be used to produce seafood in an environmentally responsible manner.

5. Transportation and Logistics:

  • Sustainable Transportation Systems: Industries will rely on sustainable transportation systems, including electric vehicles, high-speed rail, and potentially even more advanced technologies like hyperloops, to move goods and people efficiently and with minimal environmental impact.
  • AI-Powered Logistics: AI systems will optimize logistics operations, from warehouse management to delivery routes, to minimize energy consumption and reduce transportation costs.  

6. Biotechnology and Bio-Manufacturing:

  • Bio-Based Materials: Industries will utilize bio-based materials in a wide range of applications, from packaging to construction.  
  • Bio-Manufacturing: Microorganisms will be used to produce a variety of products, including fuels, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals, in a sustainable manner.

7. Circular Economy and Waste Management:

  • Waste as a Resource: Waste will be viewed as a valuable resource, with advanced recycling and upcycling technologies used to recover materials and create new products.
  • Extended Producer Responsibility: Manufacturers will be responsible for the entire lifecycle of their products, including their end-of-life management.  

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology could be applied in industry in 2810. The specific applications will depend on the technological advancements that are made in the coming centuries. However, it is clear that sustainable technology will play a crucial role in creating a more environmentally responsible and resource-efficient industrial sector.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2810 ?

You’re asking about the very cutting edge of future possibilities! While we can’t know for sure what R&D will look like in centuries to come, we can imagine some key areas and approaches based on current trends:

1. Fundamental Science & Discovery:

  • New Physics: Exploring and harnessing new fundamental forces or particles could unlock unimaginable energy sources or manipulation of matter. Think beyond fusion – perhaps tapping into zero-point energy or manipulating spacetime itself.
  • Consciousness & AI: Research into the nature of consciousness may lead to breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, creating truly sentient AI that can drive innovation in ways we can’t fathom.
  • Extreme-Scale Computing: Quantum computing or other forms of advanced computation may allow for simulations and modeling of complex systems (like climate or ecosystems) with unprecedented accuracy, accelerating the development of solutions.  

2. Materials Science & Engineering:

  • Programmable Matter: Imagine materials that can change their properties on demand, adapting to different needs or environmental conditions. This could revolutionize manufacturing, construction, and even personal devices.
  • Self-Assembling Structures: Research into how molecules and materials can self-assemble could lead to the creation of infrastructure that builds and repairs itself, reducing human intervention and resource needs.
  • Beyond Carbon: Exploring materials beyond carbon, like silicon or other elements, could lead to new forms of energy storage, construction, and even electronics.

3. Biotechnology & Synthetic Biology:

  • Directed Evolution: We might learn to direct the evolution of organisms to perform specific tasks, like cleaning up pollution or producing valuable resources.
  • Synthetic Ecosystems: Creating artificial ecosystems that can sustain themselves and provide essential services, like clean water or food, could be crucial for space colonization or restoring damaged environments on Earth.
  • Bio-Integrated Technology: Blurring the lines between living organisms and technology could lead to new forms of sensors, actuators, and even computational devices that are integrated with biological systems.  

4. Artificial Intelligence & Robotics:

  • General AI: Achieving artificial general intelligence, AI that can perform any intellectual task a human can, could lead to breakthroughs in all areas of sustainable technology.
  • Autonomous Research: AI systems could be designed to conduct their own research, analyze data, and develop new hypotheses, accelerating the pace of scientific discovery.  
  • Swarm Robotics: Large numbers of small, coordinated robots could be used for tasks like environmental monitoring, resource extraction, or even large-scale construction projects.  

5. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

  • Convergence of Fields: The most significant breakthroughs will likely come from the convergence of different fields, such as physics, biology, materials science, and AI.
  • Global Research Networks: International collaboration will be essential for sharing knowledge, resources, and expertise to address global sustainability challenges.
  • Citizen Science: Engaging the public in research and development through citizen science initiatives could accelerate the pace of innovation and ensure that sustainable technologies are aligned with societal needs.

How R&D Might Change:

  • Simulation & Virtual Worlds: Advanced simulations may allow researchers to test and refine new technologies in virtual environments before they are built in the real world, reducing costs and risks.  
  • AI-Assisted Research: AI systems could help researchers analyze vast amounts of data, identify patterns, and generate new hypotheses, accelerating the pace of discovery.  
  • Decentralized Research: Open-source platforms and collaborative research networks could democratize access to research and development resources, fostering innovation and creativity.  

It’s important to remember that this is just speculation. The actual research and development of sustainable technology in 2810 could be very different from what we can imagine today. However, by continuing to invest in science, technology, and education, we can increase the chances of creating a sustainable future for all.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Accenture

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
  53. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
  77. ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
  96. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
  107. ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »