Sustainable Technology in 2950 ?

Leave a Comment / ustainable Technology in 2950 / By
81 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

Sustainable Technology in 2950 ?

It’s impossible to predict the exact state of sustainable technology in 2950. However, we can speculate based on current trends and potential future developments:

Possible Trends:

  • Advanced Energy Solutions: Fusion power, highly efficient solar energy, and advanced energy storage solutions could be commonplace.
  • Resource Optimization: Technologies for closed-loop recycling, resource extraction from waste, and minimizing material usage could be highly advanced.
  • Biotechnology: Bio-integrated technologies for energy production, material synthesis, and environmental remediation could be widely used.
  • Artificial Intelligence: AI-driven systems for optimizing energy grids, managing resources, and predicting environmental changes could be essential.  
  • Nanotechnology: Nanomaterials for water purification, pollution control, and enhanced energy efficiency could be prevalent.

Challenges:

  • Unforeseen environmental issues: New environmental challenges may arise, requiring innovative solutions.
  • Technological limitations: Physical limitations and resource constraints may pose challenges to technological advancements.
  • Societal factors: Adoption of sustainable technologies will depend on societal values, economic factors, and governance structures.

Overall:

Sustainable technology in 2950 will likely be highly advanced and integrated into all aspects of life. It will play a crucial role in addressing environmental challenges, ensuring resource availability, and supporting a sustainable future for humanity.

Additional Points:

  • The rate of technological progress is unpredictable, making it difficult to foresee the exact nature of future technologies.
  • Sustainable technology will need to address not only environmental issues but also social and economic factors to achieve long-term sustainability.  
  • International cooperation and knowledge sharing will be essential for developing and implementing sustainable technologies globally.

While we cannot know for sure what sustainable technology will look like in 2950, it is clear that it will be essential for creating a sustainable future for generations to come.Sources and related content

What is Sustainable Technology in 2950  ?

It’s exciting to think about sustainable technology in 2950! While we can’t predict the future with certainty, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and potential breakthroughs. Here’s what sustainable technology might look like nearly a thousand years from now:

1. Energy:

  • Fusion Power: Imagine a world where clean, abundant energy is readily available through advanced fusion reactors. This could power entire cities and industries with minimal environmental impact.
  • Space-Based Solar: Massive solar arrays in space could capture sunlight without atmospheric interference and beam it down to Earth, providing a constant source of clean energy.  
  • Hyper-Efficient Energy Storage: Advanced materials and technologies could allow for incredibly efficient energy storage, making renewable energy sources like solar and wind more reliable and widely usable.

2. Resource Management:

  • Closed-Loop Recycling: Highly advanced recycling systems could break down materials at the molecular level and reuse them endlessly, minimizing waste and the need for raw material extraction.  
  • Resource Extraction from Waste: Technologies could be developed to extract valuable resources from waste materials, turning trash into a valuable source of raw materials.
  • Precision Agriculture: AI-powered systems could optimize agriculture, using resources like water and fertilizer with incredible precision, minimizing waste and environmental impact.  

3. Biotechnology:

  • Bio-Integrated Technologies: Imagine technologies that seamlessly integrate with living organisms. This could lead to bio-engineered materials, energy production through biological processes, and even environmental remediation using specially designed microbes.
  • Synthetic Biology: The ability to design and create new biological systems could revolutionize medicine, agriculture, and materials science, leading to sustainable solutions in various fields.  

4. Artificial Intelligence:

  • AI-Driven Optimization: AI systems could manage energy grids, transportation networks, and resource allocation with incredible efficiency, minimizing waste and environmental impact.  
  • Predictive Environmental Modeling: Advanced AI could create highly accurate models of environmental systems, allowing us to predict and mitigate potential environmental disasters.  

5. Nanotechnology:

  • Advanced Materials: Nanomaterials could be used to create incredibly strong, lightweight, and durable materials for construction, transportation, and other applications, reducing resource consumption.  
  • Environmental Remediation: Nanotechnology could be used to develop highly effective methods for cleaning up pollution and restoring damaged ecosystems.  

Challenges and Considerations:

  • Unforeseen Environmental Issues: New environmental challenges may arise that require innovative technological solutions.
  • Technological Limitations: There may be physical limitations or resource constraints that pose challenges to technological advancements.
  • Societal Factors: The adoption of sustainable technologies will depend on societal values, economic factors, and governance structures.

Overall:

Sustainable technology in 2950 will likely be highly advanced and integrated into all aspects of life. It will play a crucial role in addressing environmental challenges, ensuring resource availability, and supporting a sustainable future for humanity.

It’s important to remember that this is just speculation. The actual nature of sustainable technology in 2950 will depend on countless factors, including the rate of technological progress, unforeseen discoveries, and the choices we make as a society. But one thing is certain: sustainable technology will be essential for creating a thriving future for generations to come.Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology in 2950  ?

In 2950, the need for sustainable technology will be universal, but some groups might have a particularly strong reliance on it:

  • General Population: Everyone will depend on sustainable technology for basic needs like energy, food, water, and shelter.
  • Scientists and Researchers: They will continue to advance sustainable technologies and find solutions to emerging environmental challenges.
  • Environmental Managers: They will oversee the implementation and maintenance of sustainable systems, ensuring the health of ecosystems.
  • Governments and Policymakers: They will make decisions about resource allocation, environmental regulations, and the development of sustainable infrastructure.
  • Industries: Companies will rely on sustainable technologies to minimize their environmental footprint and maintain resource availability.  

Overall:

Sustainable technology in 2950 will be essential for the survival and well-being of all of humanity. It will be deeply integrated into every aspect of life, ensuring a healthy planet and a thriving society for generations to come.

When is required Sustainable Technology in 2950  ?

It’s more accurate to say that sustainable technology will be continuously required in 2950, rather than pinpointing a specific moment. Here’s why:

  • Ongoing Resource Management: Sustainable technologies will be essential for the continuous management of resources like energy, water, and materials. This means constant operation and maintenance of systems for recycling, resource extraction, and efficient energy generation.
  • Adapting to Change: The environment and society will likely continue to evolve, requiring ongoing innovation and adaptation of sustainable technologies to address new challenges and needs.
  • Maintaining Equilibrium: Sustainable technology will be crucial for maintaining a balance between human needs and the health of the planet. This requires constant monitoring, adjustment, and improvement of systems to ensure long-term sustainability.

In essence:

Sustainable technology in 2950 won’t be something that’s “needed” at a specific time, but rather a fundamental and integrated part of daily life, continuously working to support a thriving and sustainable society.

Think of it like the air we breathe – we don’t need it at a specific moment, we need it constantly to survive. Similarly, sustainable technology in 2950 will be an essential and ongoing requirement for the well-being of humanity and the planet

COURTESY : Voith Group

Where is required Sustainable Technology in 2950  ?

Sustainable technology in 2950 will be required everywhere. It won’t be confined to specific locations but rather integrated into all aspects of human life and the environment. Here’s a breakdown:

  • Urban Centers: Cities will rely on sustainable infrastructure for energy, water management, waste disposal, transportation, and building materials.
  • Rural Areas: Sustainable agriculture, resource management, and energy generation will be crucial for supporting rural communities and preserving natural ecosystems.
  • Homes and Workplaces: Sustainable technologies will be integrated into buildings for energy efficiency, water conservation, and resource recycling.
  • Transportation Systems: Sustainable transportation networks will be essential for moving people and goods efficiently and with minimal environmental impact. This could include advanced electric vehicles, maglev trains, or even entirely new forms of transportation.
  • Industrial Facilities: Industries will need to adopt sustainable processes and technologies to minimize their environmental footprint and ensure resource availability.
  • Natural Ecosystems: Sustainable technologies will be used to monitor, protect, and restore natural ecosystems, preserving biodiversity and ecosystem services. This might involve advanced sensors, remote sensing, and even active ecological restoration projects.
  • Space: If humanity has expanded beyond Earth, sustainable technologies will be even more critical for resource management and survival in space colonies or on other planets.

In short, sustainable technology in 2950 will be ubiquitous, woven into the fabric of everyday life and essential for supporting a thriving and sustainable society across the globe and potentially beyond.

How is required Sustainable Technology in 2950  ?

It’s fascinating to imagine how sustainable technology will be implemented in 2950! Here are some potential ways it could be integrated into society:

1. Seamless Integration:

  • Sustainable technologies will likely be so advanced and integrated that they become invisible to us. Imagine energy grids that automatically optimize consumption, or buildings that constantly adapt to environmental conditions without us even noticing.

2. AI-Driven Management:

  • AI systems could be responsible for managing complex sustainable systems, from energy distribution to resource allocation. These systems would constantly monitor, analyze, and adjust to ensure optimal efficiency and minimize environmental impact.

3. Personalized Sustainability:

  • Individuals might have personal AI assistants that help them make sustainable choices in their daily lives. These assistants could provide information on the environmental impact of products, suggest sustainable alternatives, and even automate sustainable actions like adjusting home energy usage.

4. Bio-Integrated Solutions:

  • Biotechnology could play a major role in sustainable solutions. Imagine buildings made from bio-engineered materials that self-repair, or energy production systems that mimic natural processes like photosynthesis.

5. Circular Economy:

  • The concept of a circular economy, where resources are constantly reused and recycled, will be deeply ingrained in society. Advanced recycling technologies could break down materials at the molecular level, allowing for the endless reuse of resources.  

6. Community-Based Sustainability:

  • Sustainable solutions might be implemented at the community level, with local energy generation, resource management, and food production systems. This could empower communities to be more self-sufficient and reduce their environmental footprint.

7. Global Collaboration:

  • International cooperation will be essential for addressing global environmental challenges. Advanced communication and data-sharing technologies could facilitate collaboration on sustainable technology development and implementation.

Overall:

Sustainable technology in 2950 will likely be characterized by its seamless integration, AI-driven management, personalized applications, bio-integrated solutions, circular economy principles, community-based initiatives, and global collaboration. It will be an essential part of life, ensuring a healthy planet and a thriving society for all.

Case study is Sustainable Technology in 2950  ?

It’s tricky to give a traditional “case study” of sustainable technology in 2950, as that implies analyzing a real-world example. But, we can create a hypothetical case study, imagining a scenario and how advanced sustainable tech might be applied.

Case Study: The Revitalization of the Amazon Rainforest in 2950

The Problem: Centuries of deforestation and climate change have severely degraded the Amazon rainforest. Biodiversity is drastically reduced, rainfall patterns are disrupted, and the region struggles to support its remaining indigenous communities.

The Solution: A global initiative is launched to revitalize the Amazon using a combination of advanced sustainable technologies:

  • AI-Powered Ecosystem Management: A network of sensors and AI systems constantly monitors the rainforest’s health, tracking everything from tree growth and water levels to animal populations and soil conditions. The AI analyzes this data to optimize reforestation efforts, manage water resources, and prevent environmental disasters like wildfires.
  • Bio-Integrated Reforestation: Drones and autonomous robots deploy bio-engineered “seed bombs” containing native plant seeds, beneficial microbes, and growth-promoting nutrients. These seed bombs are designed to thrive in the degraded soil conditions, accelerating the reforestation process.
  • Advanced Water Management: Atmospheric water generators and advanced irrigation systems provide water to the rainforest, even during periods of drought. These systems are powered by renewable energy sources and designed to minimize water waste.
  • Sustainable Resource Extraction: Local communities are empowered to sustainably harvest resources from the rainforest using advanced technologies that minimize environmental impact. For example, they might use precision agriculture techniques to grow food without depleting the soil or 3D printing to create tools and materials from sustainably sourced biomaterials.
  • Restoration of Biodiversity: Scientists use genetic engineering and cloning techniques to restore populations of endangered species. They also work to create artificial habitats that mimic the conditions needed for these species to thrive.  

The Outcome:

  • The Amazon rainforest is gradually restored to its former glory, with increased biodiversity, improved rainfall patterns, and a thriving ecosystem.
  • Local communities are able to live sustainably in the rainforest, using its resources without harming the environment.
  • The Amazon becomes a vital carbon sink, helping to mitigate climate change.

Key Takeaways:

  • This case study highlights the potential of advanced sustainable technologies to address complex environmental challenges.
  • It shows how AI, biotechnology, nanotechnology, and other fields could be combined to create comprehensive solutions.
  • It emphasizes the importance of global collaboration and community involvement in achieving sustainability goals.

While this is just a hypothetical example, it gives us a glimpse into the possibilities of sustainable technology in the future. By imagining these scenarios, we can start to think about the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead, and how we can work towards a more sustainable future for all.

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

White paper on Sustainable Technology in 2950  ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 2950: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 2950. While precise predictions are impossible, we can extrapolate from current trends and envision how advanced technologies might address the critical challenges of resource management, environmental protection, and human well-being in the distant future. This paper examines potential advancements in energy, resource management, biotechnology, artificial intelligence, and nanotechnology, highlighting their interconnectedness and their crucial role in creating a truly sustainable civilization.

1. Introduction:

The imperative for sustainability has driven technological innovation for centuries. By 2950, it is envisioned that sustainable principles will be deeply ingrained in every facet of human life. This paper explores the potential technological landscape that enables this reality, acknowledging the inherent uncertainties of long-term forecasting while emphasizing the importance of proactive planning and ethical considerations.

2. Energy:

The cornerstone of any sustainable society is access to clean, abundant energy. In 2950, this could be achieved through:

  • Fusion Power: Highly efficient and commercially viable fusion reactors providing baseload power with minimal waste.
  • Space-Based Solar: Large-scale solar arrays orbiting Earth, capturing sunlight unimpeded by the atmosphere and beaming clean energy to the surface.
  • Advanced Energy Storage: Revolutionary battery technologies and other storage solutions enabling seamless integration of intermittent renewable sources.
  • Ambient Energy Harvesting: Widespread use of technologies that capture energy from the environment (e.g., vibrations, thermal gradients) to power small devices and infrastructure.  

3. Resource Management:

A circular economy, minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization, will be essential:

  • Closed-Loop Recycling: Advanced materials and recycling processes enabling near-total recovery and reuse of resources.
  • Resource Extraction from Waste: Technologies to efficiently extract valuable materials from waste streams, turning refuse into a resource.  
  • Precision Agriculture: AI-powered systems optimizing resource use in agriculture, minimizing waste and environmental impact.  
  • Sustainable Materials: Development and use of bio-based, biodegradable, and highly durable materials.

4. Biotechnology:

Biotechnology offers transformative potential for sustainability:

  • Bio-Integrated Technologies: Integrating biological systems with technology for energy production, material synthesis, and environmental remediation.
  • Synthetic Biology: Designing and creating new biological systems for sustainable production of fuels, materials, and pharmaceuticals.
  • Bioremediation: Using biological processes to clean up pollution and restore damaged ecosystems.  

5. Artificial Intelligence:

AI will play a crucial role in optimizing and managing complex sustainable systems:

  • AI-Driven Optimization: Managing energy grids, transportation networks, and resource allocation for maximum efficiency and minimal waste.
  • Predictive Environmental Modeling: Creating highly accurate models of environmental systems to predict and mitigate potential disasters.
  • Personalized Sustainability Assistants: AI companions guiding individuals in making sustainable choices in their daily lives.

6. Nanotechnology:

Nanotechnology offers solutions for various sustainability challenges:

  • Advanced Materials: Creating ultra-strong, lightweight, and durable materials for construction, transportation, and other applications.  
  • Environmental Remediation: Developing nanomaterials for highly effective pollution cleanup and ecosystem restoration.
  • Enhanced Energy Efficiency: Using nanomaterials to improve the efficiency of solar cells, batteries, and other energy technologies.  

7. Interconnectedness and Synergies:

The true power of sustainable technology in 2950 will lie in the integration of these different fields. For example, AI could manage complex bio-integrated energy systems, while nanotechnology could create the materials for advanced recycling facilities. These synergistic relationships will be crucial for creating truly sustainable solutions.

8. Ethical Considerations:

As we develop these powerful technologies, ethical considerations must be at the forefront. We must ensure that these technologies are used responsibly and equitably, and that they do not create new environmental or social problems.

9. Conclusion:

The vision of sustainable technology in 2950 is one of a world where human needs are met in harmony with the planet. While the specific technologies described in this paper are speculative, they represent the potential for innovation to address the challenges of the future. By investing in research and development, fostering collaboration, and prioritizing ethical considerations, we can pave the way for a truly sustainable civilization.Sources and related content

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology in 2950  ?

Let’s imagine some industrial applications of sustainable technology in 2950. Keep in mind, this is speculative but based on current trends and potential future developments:

1. Closed-Loop Manufacturing:

  • Scenario: A factory produces complex electronic devices.
  • Sustainable Tech: Advanced robotic systems disassemble old devices, separating materials at the molecular level. Nanotechnology is used to purify and refine these materials. AI-powered systems optimize the manufacturing process, using only the necessary resources and minimizing waste. 3D printing and additive manufacturing create new devices using the recycled materials.  
  • Impact: Virtually no raw materials are needed, and waste is eliminated. Manufacturing becomes a truly circular process.

2. Sustainable Resource Extraction:

  • Scenario: A mining company needs to access rare earth minerals.
  • Sustainable Tech: Autonomous, AI-controlled robots perform precision mining, minimizing environmental disruption. Biotechnology is used to extract minerals from ore with minimal chemical processing. Nanotechnology is used to create highly durable and recyclable mining equipment.  
  • Impact: Mining becomes less destructive to the environment, and resources are used more efficiently.

3. Clean Energy Production:

  • Scenario: A city needs a reliable source of clean energy.
  • Sustainable Tech: A network of fusion power plants provides baseload energy. Space-based solar arrays supplement this with additional power. Smart grids, managed by AI, distribute energy efficiently and minimize losses. Local microgrids, powered by renewable sources like wind and solar, provide energy to individual communities.  
  • Impact: The city has access to clean, abundant energy, reducing its carbon footprint and dependence on fossil fuels.

4. Sustainable Agriculture:

  • Scenario: A large agricultural company needs to increase food production while minimizing environmental impact.
  • Sustainable Tech: Precision agriculture techniques, using AI and sensors, optimize water and fertilizer use. Biotechnology is used to develop crops that are more resistant to pests and disease, reducing the need for pesticides. Vertical farms, powered by renewable energy, grow crops in controlled environments, minimizing land use and water consumption.  
  • Impact: Food production increases while environmental impact decreases.

5. Biomanufacturing:

  • Scenario: A company needs to produce new materials for construction.
  • Sustainable Tech: Synthetic biology is used to engineer microorganisms that can produce desired materials, such as bioplastics or bio-concrete. These materials are grown in bioreactors, using renewable resources as feedstock.  
  • Impact: Production of materials becomes more sustainable and less reliant on fossil fuels.

6. Environmental Remediation:

  • Scenario: A company needs to clean up a polluted site.
  • Sustainable Tech: Nanotechnology is used to develop materials that can absorb pollutants from soil and water. Bioremediation techniques, using specially engineered microbes, break down pollutants into harmless substances.  
  • Impact: Polluted sites are cleaned up effectively and efficiently, restoring ecosystems.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology could be applied in industry in 2950. The key is that these technologies will be integrated into all aspects of industrial activity, creating a truly sustainable economy.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology in 2950  ?

It’s fascinating to consider how research and development (R&D) for sustainable technology might function in 2950! Here are some potential aspects:

1. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

  • R&D will likely be highly interdisciplinary, with experts from fields like physics, biology, computer science, materials science, and social sciences working together to develop holistic solutions.
  • Imagine teams of scientists, engineers, and even ethicists collaborating on projects to ensure that new technologies are not only effective but also safe and ethical.

2. AI-Assisted Research:

  • AI will likely play a significant role in accelerating the research process. AI systems could analyze vast amounts of data, identify patterns, and generate hypotheses, helping researchers to focus their efforts on the most promising areas.  
  • AI could also be used to design experiments, simulate complex systems, and even automate laboratory tasks, freeing up researchers to focus on more creative aspects of their work.  

3. Virtual and Augmented Reality:

  • Virtual and augmented reality technologies could be used to create immersive research environments, allowing scientists to explore complex systems and visualize data in new ways.  
  • Imagine researchers using VR to explore the inner workings of a fusion reactor or AR to overlay data onto a real-world environment to study pollution patterns.

4. Global Knowledge Sharing:

  • Open-source platforms and advanced communication technologies could facilitate global knowledge sharing and collaboration. Researchers from all over the world could easily share their findings, data, and ideas, accelerating the pace of innovation.
  • Imagine a global network of researchers working together to solve the world’s most pressing sustainability challenges.

5. Focus on Long-Term Sustainability:

  • R&D will likely prioritize long-term sustainability goals, focusing on developing technologies that not only address immediate needs but also ensure the well-being of future generations.
  • This might involve research into areas like space-based solar power, advanced resource recycling, and even geoengineering technologies to mitigate climate change.

6. Ethical Considerations:

  • Ethical considerations will be at the forefront of R&D. Researchers will need to carefully consider the potential impacts of new technologies on the environment, society, and future generations.
  • Ethics boards and regulatory frameworks will likely be in place to ensure that research is conducted responsibly and that new technologies are used in a way that benefits humanity and the planet.

7. Citizen Science:

  • Citizen science initiatives could empower individuals to contribute to research efforts. People could participate in data collection, analysis, and even experimentation, helping to accelerate the pace of discovery.
  • Imagine communities working together to monitor local ecosystems or contributing to global climate research projects.

Overall:

Research and development of sustainable technology in 2950 will likely be characterized by interdisciplinary collaboration, AI assistance, immersive research environments, global knowledge sharing, a focus on long-term sustainability, ethical considerations, and citizen science initiatives. It will be a dynamic and collaborative process, driving innovation and ensuring a sustainable future for all.Sources and related content

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
  53. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
  77. ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
  96. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
  107. ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »