Sustainable technology of 4530

79 / 100

Sustainable technology of 4530 ?

The IMPACT 4530 is a metal Additive Manufacturing (AM) machine from IRPD. It is a type of 3D printing technology that uses metal powder to create parts layer by layer. This technology can be used to create complex parts with high precision and accuracy.

Some of the sustainable aspects of this technology include:

Reduced material waste: Additive manufacturing uses only the material needed to create the part, reducing waste compared to traditional manufacturing methods.
Lightweighting: AM can be used to create lighter parts, which can lead to energy savings in transportation and other applications.
On-demand production: AM can be used to produce parts on demand, reducing the need for large inventories and transportation.
Localized production: AM can be used to produce parts locally, reducing the need for long supply chains and transportation.

Overall, the IMPACT 4530 and other metal AM technologies have the potential to contribute to a more sustainable future by reducing material waste, energy consumption, and transportation needs.

What is Sustainable technology of 4530 ?

It seems you might be thinking of the Flygt 4530 mixer, a product by Xylem. This is a mid-size, low-speed mixer designed for various applications in wastewater treatment and other industries.

Here’s how the Flygt 4530 contributes to sustainability:

Energy Efficiency: It features a high-efficiency, clog-free propeller and a reliable drive unit with IE3 motor efficiency. This can lead to up to 50% power savings compared to high-speed mixers in similar operations.
Reduced Operational Costs: The efficient design and durable components contribute to lower operational costs over the mixer’s lifespan.
Long-lasting: Designed for more than 50,000 hours of operation, the Flygt 4530 is built to last, reducing the need for frequent replacements and minimizing waste.

Applications where the Flygt 4530 is used:

Biological nutrient removal processes (activated sludge, SBR, MBBR)
Sludge holding tanks and digestion
Equalization tanks
Grit chambers
Retention tanks
Lagoons

If you were thinking of something else with the number 4530, please provide more details so I can assist you better.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4530 ?

The Flygt 4530 mixer is a sustainable technology that’s required by a variety of users and industries, primarily those dealing with wastewater treatment and fluid mixing in general. Here’s a breakdown of who benefits most:

Wastewater Treatment Plants (Municipal and Industrial): This is the primary market. The 4530 is crucial for processes like:
- Biological Nutrient Removal: Efficient mixing in activated sludge, SBR, and MBBR systems for effective treatment.
- Sludge Management: Mixing in holding tanks and digesters for optimized processing.
- Equalization and Retention: Ensuring consistent flow and treatment in tanks.
Industries with Fluid Mixing Needs:
- Chemical Processing: Blending and mixing various solutions.
- Pulp and Paper: Mixing in various stages of paper production.
- Food and Beverage: Mixing ingredients and maintaining consistency.
- Agriculture: Mixing in manure storage and treatment systems.
Engineering and Consulting Firms: Those designing and specifying wastewater treatment systems will often recommend the Flygt 4530 due to its efficiency and reliability.
Facility Owners and Operators: Anyone responsible for the operation and maintenance of systems requiring fluid mixing will appreciate the 4530’s energy efficiency, durability, and low maintenance needs.

Why is it “required”?

While not “required” in a legal sense, the Flygt 4530 is often the preferred choice due to its:

High Efficiency: Leading to significant energy savings and reduced operating costs.
Reliability: Built for long-lasting performance with minimal downtime.
Sustainability: Contributes to environmentally friendly operations through reduced energy consumption.

In essence, anyone seeking efficient, reliable, and sustainable fluid mixing solutions, particularly in wastewater treatment, will find the Flygt 4530 a valuable and often “required” technology.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4530 ?

The Flygt 4530 mixer is required whenever efficient and sustainable fluid mixing is needed, especially in wastewater treatment and similar applications. Here’s a breakdown of when it’s particularly important:

1. New Wastewater Treatment Plant Construction or Upgrades:

When designing and building new plants, engineers and consultants often specify the Flygt 4530 due to its proven performance, energy efficiency, and long lifespan.
During upgrades or expansions of existing plants, the 4530 can replace less efficient mixers, leading to immediate energy savings and improved treatment performance.

2. Situations with High Energy Costs:

If a facility faces significant energy expenses for fluid mixing, switching to the 4530 can provide a substantial return on investment through reduced power consumption.

3. Projects with Sustainability Goals:

Organizations committed to environmental responsibility will find the 4530 aligned with their objectives. Its energy efficiency directly contributes to lowering carbon footprint.

4. Space-Constrained Environments:

The 4530 is designed for situations where space is limited. It can provide efficient mixing even when a full-size mixer might be too large.

5. Processes Requiring Specific Mixing Performance:

The 4530 is well-suited for various applications, including:
- Biological nutrient removal in wastewater treatment
- Sludge management in digesters and holding tanks
- Mixing in equalization and retention tanks

6. Long-Term Cost Considerations:

While the initial investment might be higher than some alternatives, the 4530’s durability and low maintenance requirements lead to lower lifecycle costs.

7. Retrofitting Existing Systems:

Replacing older, less efficient mixers with the 4530 can be a straightforward way to improve performance and sustainability in existing facilities.

In summary, the Flygt 4530 is required whenever the need arises for a reliable, energy-efficient, and sustainable solution for fluid mixing, particularly in wastewater treatment and similar industries. Its benefits are most pronounced in situations with high energy costs, sustainability goals, space constraints, and specific mixing performance requirements.

COURTESY : TURILYTIX

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4530 ?

The Flygt 4530 mixer is required in a variety of locations where efficient and sustainable fluid mixing is essential. Here are some key places where this technology is commonly needed:

1. Wastewater Treatment Plants:

Municipal Wastewater Treatment: The 4530 is crucial for various stages, including:
- Biological Nutrient Removal (BNR): Efficient mixing in activated sludge, SBR, and MBBR systems for effective treatment.
- Sludge Management: Mixing in holding tanks and digesters for optimized processing.
- Equalization and Retention: Ensuring consistent flow and treatment in tanks.
Industrial Wastewater Treatment: Many industries, such as food processing, chemical manufacturing, and pulp and paper, require wastewater treatment and can benefit from the 4530’s capabilities.

2. Industrial Facilities:

Chemical Processing: The 4530 can be used for blending and mixing various solutions in chemical plants.
Pulp and Paper: It plays a role in different stages of paper production, where mixing is necessary.
Food and Beverage: The 4530 helps with mixing ingredients and maintaining consistency in food and beverage production.
Agriculture: It can be used for mixing in manure storage and treatment systems.

3. Other Applications:

Mining: The 4530 can be used in various mining processes that require fluid mixing.
Aquaculture: It can be used in fish farms and other aquaculture operations.
Biogas Plants: The 4530 can be used for mixing in anaerobic digesters.

In general, the Flygt 4530 is required in any location where there is a need for:

Efficient and reliable fluid mixing: The 4530 is known for its high performance and dependability.
Sustainable operation: Its energy efficiency contributes to environmentally friendly practices.
Cost-effectiveness: The 4530’s long lifespan and low maintenance requirements make it a cost-effective solution in the long run.

Therefore, you’ll find the Flygt 4530 in a wide range of settings, from large municipal wastewater treatment plants to smaller industrial facilities, wherever efficient and sustainable fluid mixing is a priority.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4530 ?

The Flygt 4530 mixer achieves its sustainability through a combination of design features and operational characteristics:

1. High Efficiency Motor and Hydraulics:

IE3 Motor Efficiency: The 4530 utilizes a high-efficiency IE3 motor, which significantly reduces energy consumption compared to standard motors. This translates to lower electricity bills and a smaller carbon footprint.
Optimized Hydraulics: The mixer’s propeller and housing are designed for optimal fluid flow and mixing efficiency. This means it can achieve the desired mixing results with less power input.

2. Durable and Long-lasting Design:

Robust Construction: The 4530 is built with durable materials and components, ensuring a long service life. This reduces the need for frequent replacements, minimizing waste and resource consumption.
Minimal Maintenance: The mixer’s design minimizes the need for maintenance and repairs, reducing downtime and resource usage associated with upkeep.

3. Reduced Energy Consumption:

Lower Operating Costs: The high efficiency of the 4530 results in significant energy savings, which translates to lower operating costs for the user.
Environmental Benefits: Reduced energy consumption leads to a smaller carbon footprint and contributes to environmental sustainability.

4. Versatile Applications:

Wide Range of Uses: The 4530 can be used in various applications, including wastewater treatment, industrial processes, and agriculture. This versatility makes it a sustainable choice for different industries.

5. Contribution to Sustainable Practices:

Wastewater Treatment: In wastewater treatment, the 4530 plays a crucial role in processes like biological nutrient removal, which helps protect water resources and ecosystems.
Resource Optimization: By promoting efficient mixing and reducing energy consumption, the 4530 contributes to the sustainable use of resources.

In summary, the Flygt 4530 achieves its sustainability through a combination of energy-efficient design, durable construction, and versatile applications. By reducing energy consumption, minimizing waste, and contributing to sustainable practices, it offers a sustainable solution for fluid mixing needs in various industries.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4530 ?

While I can’t provide specific case studies with confidential data, I can outline a hypothetical case study demonstrating the sustainable benefits of the Flygt 4530 mixer. This will illustrate the types of improvements a real-world user might experience.

Hypothetical Case Study: Green Valley Wastewater Treatment Plant

Background:

The Green Valley Wastewater Treatment Plant was experiencing high energy costs due to older, inefficient mixers in their activated sludge basins. They were also under pressure to reduce their environmental footprint and improve treatment performance. They decided to upgrade their mixing system.

Solution:

Green Valley replaced their existing mixers with Flygt 4530 mixers. They chose the 4530 because of its proven energy efficiency, durability, and suitability for their specific basin dimensions and mixing requirements.

Results:

Energy Savings: After installing the 4530 mixers, Green Valley saw a significant reduction in their energy consumption for basin mixing. They measured a 30% decrease in electricity usage compared to the previous system. This translated to substantial cost savings on their monthly energy bills.
Improved Treatment Performance: The optimized mixing provided by the 4530s led to better distribution of oxygen and nutrients in the activated sludge basins. This resulted in more efficient biological treatment and improved removal of pollutants.
Reduced Maintenance Costs: The durable construction of the 4530 mixers meant less frequent maintenance and fewer repairs compared to the old system. This reduced downtime and maintenance costs for the plant.
Environmental Impact: The reduced energy consumption directly lowered Green Valley’s carbon footprint, contributing to their sustainability goals. The improved treatment performance also helped protect the receiving water body.

Conclusion:

The Green Valley Wastewater Treatment Plant case study demonstrates the sustainable benefits of the Flygt 4530 mixer. By improving energy efficiency, enhancing treatment performance, and reducing maintenance needs, the 4530 helped the plant achieve both economic and environmental sustainability.

Key Sustainability Aspects Demonstrated:

Energy Efficiency: Significant reduction in electricity consumption.
Cost Savings: Lower energy and maintenance costs.
Improved Treatment: Enhanced removal of pollutants, benefiting the environment.
Reduced Environmental Footprint: Lower carbon emissions.
Long-Term Reliability: Durable construction leading to reduced waste and resource consumption.

This hypothetical case study illustrates the kind of positive impact the Flygt 4530 can have. Real-world results will vary depending on the specific application and existing conditions, but the core benefits of energy efficiency and sustainability remain consistent. To find real case studies, it is best to check the Xylem website or contact a Xylem representative directly. They often have customer testimonials and data available.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4530 ?

I can’t directly provide a specific, published white paper on the Flygt 4530. White papers are usually created and distributed by the manufacturers (Xylem, in this case) or industry associations. However, I can guide you on how to find one and what kind of information it might contain.

How to Find a White Paper:

Xylem Website: The best place to start is the official Xylem website (xylem.com). Look for their “Resources,” “Literature,” “Downloads,” or similar sections. Search for “Flygt 4530,” “mixers,” or “wastewater treatment.” They often have white papers, application notes, and technical brochures available for download.
Contact Xylem Directly: Reach out to Xylem’s sales or support team. They can provide you with the latest information, including any relevant white papers. You can typically find contact information on their website.
Industry Associations: Organizations related to wastewater treatment, water management, or specific industries where the 4530 is used (e.g., water & wastewater associations) may have resources or links to white papers on relevant technologies.
Engineering and Consulting Firms: Companies that specialize in designing and building wastewater treatment plants often have libraries of technical documents, including white papers, that they might share with clients or colleagues.

What a White Paper Might Contain:

A white paper on the Flygt 4530 and its sustainability aspects could cover the following:

Introduction to the 4530: Overview of the mixer’s features, applications, and benefits.
Sustainability Focus: Discussion of the key sustainability drivers in wastewater treatment and other relevant industries.
Energy Efficiency: Detailed explanation of the 4530’s high-efficiency motor, optimized hydraulics, and how these contribute to energy savings. It might include comparative data against other mixer types.
Life Cycle Cost Analysis: Comparison of the 4530’s total cost of ownership over its lifespan, including initial investment, operating costs (energy), maintenance, and repair. This often demonstrates the long-term cost benefits of the 4530 despite potentially higher initial costs.
Case Studies: Real-world examples of how the 4530 has been successfully implemented in different applications, highlighting the achieved energy savings, improved treatment performance, and other benefits. (As discussed in the previous response, these are very helpful).
Environmental Impact: Discussion of how the 4530 contributes to reducing environmental impact through lower energy consumption and improved treatment processes. This might include quantification of carbon footprint reduction.
Technical Specifications: Detailed technical data on the 4530, including performance curves, dimensions, and material specifications.
Conclusion: Summary of the key benefits and sustainability advantages of the Flygt 4530.

Remember to be specific in your search when looking for a white paper. Using keywords like “Flygt 4530 white paper,” “Flygt 4530 sustainability,” or “Flygt 4530 energy efficiency” will help you find the most relevant information.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4530 ?

The Flygt 4530 mixer, while commonly associated with wastewater treatment, has a range of industrial applications where its sustainable technology provides significant benefits. Here are some key examples:

1. Chemical Processing:

Blending and Mixing: The 4530’s efficient mixing capabilities are crucial in chemical plants for blending various solutions, ensuring consistent product quality and reaction efficiency.
Process Optimization: Its ability to handle different viscosities and densities makes it suitable for various chemical processes, contributing to optimized production and reduced energy consumption.

2. Pulp and Paper:

Mixing in Various Stages: The 4530 can be used in different stages of paper production, such as pulp preparation, chemical addition, and wastewater treatment.
Improved Efficiency: Its high-efficiency motor and optimized hydraulics contribute to energy savings and reduced operating costs in paper mills.

3. Food and Beverage:

Mixing Ingredients: In food and beverage production, the 4530 ensures consistent mixing of ingredients, maintaining product quality and uniformity.
Hygiene and Safety: Its stainless steel construction and design features make it suitable for applications with strict hygiene requirements in the food and beverage industry.

4. Agriculture:

Manure Treatment: The 4530 can be used for mixing in manure storage and treatment systems, promoting efficient processing and reducing environmental impact.
Biogas Production: Its ability to handle solids and fibrous materials makes it suitable for mixing in anaerobic digesters used in biogas production.

5. Mining:

Mineral Processing: The 4530 can be used in various mining processes that require fluid mixing, such as slurry preparation and tailings management.
Harsh Environments: Its robust construction and durability make it suitable for the demanding conditions often found in mining operations.

6. Aquaculture:

Fish Farms: The 4530 can be used in fish farms and other aquaculture operations to maintain water quality and ensure proper distribution of nutrients.
Oxygenation: Its efficient mixing can contribute to better oxygenation of water, promoting fish health and growth.

Benefits Across Industries:

Energy Efficiency: The 4530’s IE3 motor and optimized hydraulics lead to significant energy savings, reducing operating costs and environmental impact.
Durability and Reliability: Its robust construction ensures long-lasting performance with minimal maintenance, reducing downtime and resource consumption.
Versatility: The 4530 can be adapted to various industrial applications with different mixing requirements, making it a sustainable choice for diverse industries.
Environmental Responsibility: By reducing energy consumption and promoting efficient processes, the 4530 contributes to the sustainability goals of various industries.

In conclusion, the Flygt 4530 mixer offers a sustainable solution for a wide range of industrial applications. Its combination of energy efficiency, durability, versatility, and environmental benefits makes it a valuable technology for industries seeking to optimize their operations and reduce their environmental footprint.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4530 ?

Research and development (R&D) in sustainable technology related to the Flygt 4530 mixer likely focuses on several key areas:

1. Further Enhancing Energy Efficiency:

Advanced Motor Technology: Research into even more efficient motor designs, such as permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSM) or other innovative technologies, to further reduce energy consumption.
Hydraulic Optimization: Continued refinement of the impeller and housing design through computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and other modeling techniques to maximize mixing efficiency and minimize power requirements.
Smart Controls: Development of intelligent control systems that can optimize mixer operation based on real-time conditions, such as flow rate, fluid viscosity, and treatment requirements, to minimize energy use.

2. Materials and Durability:

Advanced Materials: Exploration of new materials with improved corrosion resistance, wear resistance, and strength to extend the lifespan of the mixer and reduce maintenance needs. This could include exploring composite materials or specialized alloys.
Coatings and Surface Treatments: Research into protective coatings and surface treatments to enhance the durability of the mixer components and protect them from harsh environments.
Predictive Maintenance: Development of sensors and monitoring systems that can predict potential failures and enable proactive maintenance, reducing downtime and extending the mixer’s operational life.

3. Environmental Impact:

Life Cycle Assessment: Conducting comprehensive life cycle assessments to evaluate the environmental impact of the 4530 throughout its entire life cycle, from manufacturing to disposal, and identifying areas for improvement.
Reduced Material Use: Exploring ways to optimize the design and manufacturing processes to reduce the amount of material used in the mixer, minimizing resource consumption and waste.
Recyclability: Designing the mixer with recyclability in mind, making it easier to disassemble and recover valuable materials at the end of its life.

4. Application-Specific Optimization:

Customized Solutions: Research into adapting the 4530 technology for specific industrial applications, such as chemical processing, pulp and paper, or food and beverage, to meet their unique mixing requirements.
Integration with Other Technologies: Developing ways to integrate the 4530 with other sustainable technologies, such as biogas production systems or renewable energy sources, to create comprehensive and efficient solutions.

5. Digitalization and Smart Technology:

IoT Integration: Incorporating sensors and connectivity to enable remote monitoring, control, and data analysis of the mixer’s performance. This data can be used to optimize operation, predict maintenance needs, and improve overall efficiency.
Digital Twins: Creating digital models of the mixer to simulate its performance under various conditions and optimize its design and operation.

Overall, R&D efforts related to the Flygt 4530 are likely focused on:

Continuously improving energy efficiency: To minimize operating costs and environmental impact.
Enhancing durability and reliability: To extend the mixer’s lifespan and reduce maintenance needs.
Minimizing environmental footprint: Through material selection, life cycle assessment, and recyclability.
Adapting to specific industry needs: To provide customized and optimized solutions.
Leveraging digitalization and smart technology: To improve performance, monitoring, and control.

By focusing on these areas, researchers and engineers can further enhance the sustainability of the Flygt 4530 mixer and contribute to more efficient and environmentally responsible industrial practices.

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050