Sustainable technology of 4170

79 / 100

Sustainable technology of 4170 ?

It appears you’re asking about the Intel Core i3-4170 processor and its role in sustainable technology. While a specific processor model might not be the most obvious example of “sustainable technology,” we can explore this in a few ways:

1. Efficiency as a Sustainability Factor:

Power Consumption: The i3-4170, with a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 54W, was designed for relatively efficient performance for its time. Lower TDP generally means less energy consumption, which contributes to sustainability by reducing electricity usage and heat generation.
Longevity: Processors like the i3-4170, while older, can still be used in systems for many tasks. Extending the lifespan of computer hardware is a form of sustainability, as it reduces the need for frequent replacements and the associated environmental impact of manufacturing and disposal.

2. Sustainable Computing Practices:

Refurbishment and Reuse: Instead of discarding older systems with i3-4170 processors, they can be refurbished and reused, giving them a second life and reducing e-waste.
Responsible Disposal: When these systems eventually reach their end-of-life, proper e-waste recycling is crucial to recover valuable materials and prevent environmental contamination.

3. The Bigger Picture of Sustainable Technology:

While the i3-4170 itself might not be a groundbreaking example of sustainable technology, it’s important to remember that sustainability in technology is a broad field. It includes:

Developing energy-efficient hardware and software: This is an ongoing effort across the industry, with newer processors and systems designed to consume less power.
Using renewable energy to power data centers and computing infrastructure: This is a crucial step in reducing the carbon footprint of technology.
Designing and manufacturing electronics with sustainable materials and processes: This involves minimizing the use of harmful substances and promoting recyclability.
Promoting responsible e-waste management: This ensures that old electronics are recycled safely and efficiently.

In conclusion: While the Intel Core i3-4170 is not a primary example of “sustainable technology” in itself, it can contribute to sustainability through its relatively efficient design and by being part of a larger ecosystem of responsible computing practices.

What is Sustainable technology of 4170 ?

This is for informational purposes only. For medical advice or diagnosis, consult a professional.

While the Intel Core i3-4170 processor itself might not be the most obvious example of “sustainable technology,” we can explore this in a few ways:

1. Efficiency as a Sustainability Factor:

Power Consumption: The i3-4170, with a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 54W, was designed for relatively efficient performance for its time. Lower TDP generally means less energy consumption, which contributes to sustainability by reducing electricity usage and heat generation.
Longevity: Processors like the i3-4170, while older, can still be used in systems for many tasks. Extending the lifespan of computer hardware is a form of sustainability, as it reduces the need for frequent replacements and the associated environmental impact of manufacturing and disposal.

2. Sustainable Computing Practices:

Refurbishment and Reuse: Instead of discarding older systems with i3-4170 processors, they can be refurbished and reused, giving them a second life and reducing e-waste.
Responsible Disposal: When these systems eventually reach their end-of-life, proper e-waste recycling is crucial to recover valuable materials and prevent environmental contamination.

3. The Bigger Picture of Sustainable Technology:

While the i3-4170 itself might not be a groundbreaking example of “sustainable technology” in itself, it’s important to remember that sustainability in technology is a broad field. It includes:

Developing energy-efficient hardware and software: This is an ongoing effort across the industry, with newer processors and systems designed to consume less power.
Using renewable energy to power data centers and computing infrastructure: This is a crucial step in reducing the carbon footprint of technology.
Designing and manufacturing electronics with sustainable materials and processes: This involves minimizing the use of harmful substances and promoting recyclability.
Promoting responsible e-waste management: This ensures that old electronics are recycled safely and efficiently.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4170 ?

This is for informational purposes only. For medical advice or diagnosis, consult a professional.

While the Intel Core i3-4170 processor itself might not be the most obvious example of “sustainable technology,” we can explore this in a few ways:

1. Efficiency as a Sustainability Factor:

Power Consumption: The i3-4170, with a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 54W, was designed for relatively efficient performance for its time. Lower TDP generally means less energy consumption, which contributes to sustainability by reducing electricity usage and heat generation.
Longevity: Processors like the i3-4170, while older, can still be used in systems for many tasks. Extending the lifespan of computer hardware is a form of sustainability, as it reduces the need for frequent replacements and the associated environmental impact of manufacturing and disposal.

2. Sustainable Computing Practices:

Refurbishment and Reuse: Instead of discarding older systems with i3-4170 processors, they can be refurbished and reused, giving them a second life and reducing e-waste.
Responsible Disposal: When these systems eventually reach their end-of-life, proper e-waste recycling is crucial to recover valuable materials and prevent environmental contamination.

3. The Bigger Picture of Sustainable Technology:

While the i3-4170 itself might not be a groundbreaking example of “sustainable technology” in itself, it’s important to remember that sustainability in technology is a broad field. It includes:

Developing energy-efficient hardware and software: This is an ongoing effort across the industry, with newer processors and systems designed to consume less power.
Using renewable energy to power data centers and computing infrastructure: This is a crucial step in reducing the carbon footprint of technology.
Designing and manufacturing electronics with sustainable materials and processes: This involves minimizing the use of harmful substances and promoting recyclability.
Promoting responsible e-waste management: This ensures that old electronics are recycled safely and efficiently.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4170 ?

It seems you’re still focusing on the Intel i3-4170 processor and its connection to sustainable technology. Let’s clarify again: the processor itself isn’t the “sustainable technology.” Sustainability comes from how it’s used and managed. Therefore, it’s not a question of when the sustainable technology of the 4170 is required, but rather when sustainable practices regarding computers containing this processor (or any computer) are important.

Sustainable practices are always relevant, but become particularly crucial in these situations:

End-of-Life: When a computer with an i3-4170 (or any computer) is no longer usable for its original purpose, sustainable practices are essential. This is when decisions about reuse, refurbishment, or responsible recycling become critical to minimize environmental impact.
Upgrade Cycles: When considering upgrading to a newer computer, it’s important to evaluate if the old machine (with the i3-4170) can be repurposed or donated rather than discarded. Extending the life of existing hardware reduces the demand for new manufacturing, which saves resources and energy.
High Energy Usage: Even during its operational life, minimizing energy consumption is always a good idea. This includes practices like powering down the computer when not in use, using power-saving settings, and ensuring efficient cooling.

In short: Sustainable technology practices related to a computer with an i3-4170 (or any computer) are required throughout the entire lifecycle of the device, from its initial use to its eventual disposal or repurposing. It’s not tied to a specific point in time, but rather a continuous mindset of responsible use and management.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4170 ?

You’re still asking about the Intel i3-4170 and sustainable technology. Let’s reiterate: the processor itself isn’t the sustainable technology. It’s the practices surrounding its use and disposal that contribute to sustainability. Therefore, it’s not about where the sustainable technology of the 4170 is required, but rather where sustainable practices regarding computers containing this processor (or any computer) are important.

Sustainable practices are relevant in any location where computers are used:

Homes: Responsible energy use, proper disposal, and considering upgrades vs. replacements are all relevant at home.
Offices: Businesses have a larger responsibility due to the higher volume of equipment. Sustainable procurement, energy-efficient operations, and robust e-waste management policies are crucial.
Schools and Educational Institutions: Similar to offices, schools have a responsibility to manage their computer equipment sustainably.
Data Centers: These are large consumers of energy, so sustainable practices are especially important. This includes using renewable energy, optimizing cooling, and efficient hardware utilization.
E-waste Recycling Facilities: Proper recycling and recovery of materials are essential to minimize environmental impact and resource depletion.
Manufacturing Facilities: Sustainable manufacturing practices, including minimizing waste and using recycled materials, are important for the production of computer hardware.

In summary: Sustainable technology practices related to a computer with an i3-4170 (or any computer) are required anywhere computers are used and managed. It’s not tied to a specific location, but rather a universal responsibility to minimize the environmental impact of technology.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4170 ?

You’re still trying to connect the Intel i3-4170 with sustainable technology. Let’s break it down one last time: the processor itself isn’t the sustainable technology. It’s how you use and manage computers containing this processor that makes a difference.

So, the question isn’t “how is sustainable technology of 4170 required?” but rather “how can we apply sustainable practices to computers with this processor?”

Here’s how you can contribute to sustainable technology with a computer that has an i3-4170:

1. Extend its lifespan:

Keep it updated: Ensure the operating system and software are up-to-date to maintain performance and security, delaying the need for a new computer.
Maintain it well: Clean the computer regularly, ensure proper ventilation, and address any hardware issues promptly to prevent premature failure.
Upgrade strategically: If possible, upgrade components like RAM or storage to improve performance and extend the computer’s usability.

2. Use it efficiently:

Power management: Utilize power-saving settings, turn off the computer when not in use, and avoid unnecessary background processes.
Optimize software: Use energy-efficient software and avoid running resource-intensive applications unnecessarily.

3. Repurpose or donate:

Find a new use: If you upgrade, consider using the old computer for a different purpose, such as a media server, a secondary computer for basic tasks, or a project computer.
Donate or sell: Donate the computer to a school, charity, or individual who needs it, or sell it to someone who can use it.

4. Recycle responsibly:

E-waste recycling: When the computer reaches its end-of-life, ensure it is recycled at a certified e-waste recycling facility. This helps recover valuable materials and prevents environmental contamination.

In essence: Sustainable technology practices related to a computer with an i3-4170 involve responsible use, maintenance, repurposing, and recycling throughout the device’s life cycle. It’s about minimizing environmental impact and maximizing the value of the hardware.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4170 ?

No, a case study is not inherently the “sustainable technology of the i3-4170.” Let’s clarify this one last time. The i3-4170 is a processor. Sustainable technology refers to practices and approaches related to technology that minimize environmental impact. A case study is a method of research or analysis.

A case study could be about sustainable technology practices related to computers containing i3-4170 processors (or any computer hardware, for that matter). But the case study itself is not the sustainable technology.

Here’s how a case study could be relevant to the topic:

A case study could examine the environmental impact of using i3-4170 processors in a specific context. For example, a case study might analyze the energy consumption of a company’s office using computers with i3-4170s and explore ways to reduce it.
A case study could investigate the effectiveness of different e-waste management strategies for computers containing i3-4170s. This might involve comparing the environmental benefits of reuse versus recycling.
A case study could explore the challenges and opportunities of refurbishing and redeploying older computers with i3-4170s in developing countries.

In these examples, the case study investigates or analyzes aspects of sustainable technology related to computers with i3-4170 processors. But the case study itself is a research tool, not the sustainable technology being studied. The sustainable technology is the set of practices and solutions aimed at reducing the environmental footprint of those computers.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4170 ?

While there isn’t likely to be a white paper specifically dedicated to the “sustainable technology of the i3-4170” (for reasons we’ve discussed), a white paper could be written about broader sustainable technology practices related to computers that include processors like the i3-4170.

Here’s what such a white paper might cover:

The Challenge of E-waste: It could discuss the growing problem of electronic waste and the environmental impact of discarding computers. It might highlight the need for sustainable practices throughout the lifecycle of computer hardware.
Extending the Life of Existing Hardware: The white paper could explore strategies for maximizing the lifespan of computers with processors like the i3-4170. This could include topics like software optimization, hardware upgrades, and proper maintenance.
Reuse and Refurbishment: It could delve into the benefits of reusing and refurbishing older computers, including reducing e-waste and providing access to technology for those who might not be able to afford new devices.
Responsible Recycling: The white paper could outline best practices for e-waste recycling, emphasizing the importance of certified recyclers and the recovery of valuable materials.
Energy Efficiency: It could discuss ways to reduce the energy consumption of computers, including power management settings, efficient software, and the use of renewable energy to power data centers.
Sustainable Procurement: The white paper might address the importance of businesses and organizations considering sustainability when purchasing new computer hardware. This could involve factors like energy efficiency, recycled materials, and product lifespan.
Case Studies: It could include case studies of organizations that have successfully implemented sustainable technology practices related to their computer hardware.

In summary: A white paper on sustainable technology related to computers might not focus solely on the i3-4170, but it could certainly include it as an example of a processor found in many computers and discuss how sustainable practices can be applied to those computers throughout their lifecycle.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4170 ?

You’re still trying to connect the Intel i3-4170 with sustainable technology. Let’s make this crystal clear: the processor itself isn’t the sustainable technology. It’s how you use and manage computers containing this processor that aligns with sustainable practices.

With that in mind, here are some industrial applications where sustainable practices can be applied to computers that might contain an i3-4170 (or similar processors):

1. Manufacturing:

Process Control: Older computers with i3-4170s might still be used for less demanding tasks like controlling machinery or monitoring production lines. Sustainable practices here include optimizing energy consumption of these systems and ensuring proper disposal when they are decommissioned.
Data Analysis: Analyzing production data to optimize efficiency and reduce waste can be done on computers with i3-4170s. Sustainability comes from using this data to improve resource utilization and minimize environmental impact.

2. Logistics and Transportation:

Inventory Management: Older systems might be used for basic inventory tracking. Sustainable practices include minimizing energy usage and properly recycling the hardware when it’s replaced.
Route Planning: Optimizing delivery routes to reduce fuel consumption can be done with software running on computers with i3-4170s. This contributes to sustainability by lowering emissions.

3. Office Environments:

General Office Tasks: Many office tasks like word processing, email, and basic data entry can still be handled by computers with i3-4170s. Sustainable practices here include energy-efficient use, responsible disposal, and considering upgrades over replacements when possible.

4. Research and Development:

Data Analysis: Analyzing research data can be done on computers with i3-4170s. Sustainable practices include using this data to develop more sustainable products and processes.

Key takeaway: In any industrial setting where computers are used, sustainable practices are essential. This includes extending the lifespan of existing hardware, using energy efficiently, and ensuring responsible recycling when the equipment is no longer usable. The specific processor model is less important than the overall approach to minimizing environmental impact.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4170 ?

It seems you’re still focused on the Intel i3-4170 and its connection to sustainable technology. Let’s be absolutely clear: the processor itself is not the sustainable technology. Sustainable technology refers to the practices and approaches we take to minimize the environmental impact of technology.

Therefore, research and development in sustainable technology related to computers (which might contain an i3-4170 or similar processors) would focus on these areas:

1. Extending the lifespan of computer hardware:

Developing more durable and reliable components: Research into materials science and manufacturing processes could lead to longer-lasting computer components, reducing the need for frequent replacements.
Improving repairability: Research could focus on designing computers that are easier to repair and upgrade, enabling users to extend their lifespan.
Software optimization: Developing software that is more efficient and requires less processing power can help older computers remain useful for longer.

2. Increasing energy efficiency:

Developing more energy-efficient processors and other components: Ongoing research in semiconductor technology aims to create processors that consume less power while maintaining performance.
Optimizing cooling systems: Research into more efficient cooling solutions can reduce the energy required to keep computers operating at optimal temperatures.
Power management technologies: Developing more sophisticated power management systems can help computers automatically adjust their energy consumption based on usage.

3. Improving e-waste management:

Developing more effective recycling processes: Research into advanced recycling techniques can help recover more valuable materials from e-waste and reduce the environmental impact of disposal.
Designing for recyclability: Research could focus on designing computers that are easier to disassemble and recycle, with components made from materials that are readily recoverable.
Exploring closed-loop systems: Research into closed-loop systems could enable the reuse of materials from old computers in the manufacturing of new ones.

4. Reducing the environmental impact of manufacturing:

Developing more sustainable manufacturing processes: Research into more environmentally friendly manufacturing processes can reduce the use of harmful chemicals and energy.
Using recycled and renewable materials: Research could focus on incorporating recycled and renewable materials into computer components.

Key takeaway: Research and development in sustainable technology related to computers focuses on minimizing the environmental impact of computers throughout their entire lifecycle, from manufacturing to disposal. While the i3-4170 might be found in some of these computers, the research is not specific to that particular processor.

COURTESY : Voith Group

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 5–6.
^ Zhang, Wei; Li, Binshuai; Xue, Rui; Wang, Chengcheng; Cao, Wei (2021). “A systematic bibliometric review of clean energy transition: Implications for low-carbon development”. PLOS ONE. 16 (12): e0261091. Bibcode:2021PLoSO..1661091Z. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0261091. PMC 8641874. PMID 34860855.
^ United Nations Development Programme 2016, p. 5.
^ “Definitions: energy, sustainability and the future”. OpenLearn. The Open University. Archived from the original on 27 January 2021. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
^ Golus̆in, Popov & Dodić 2013, p. 8.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Hammond, Geoffrey P.; Jones, Craig I. “Sustainability criteria for energy resources and technologies”. In Galarraga, González-Eguino & Markandya (2011), pp. 21–47.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNECE 2020, pp. 3–4.
^ Gunnarsdottir, I.; Davidsdottir, B.; Worrell, E.; Sigurgeirsdottir, S. (May 2021). “Sustainable energy development: History of the concept and emerging themes”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 141: 110770. Bibcode:2021RSERv.14110770G. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110770. hdl:1874/411740.
^ Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 1–2.
^ Vera, Ivan; Langlois, Lucille (2007). “Energy indicators for sustainable development”. Energy. 32 (6): 875–882. Bibcode:2007Ene….32..875V. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2006.08.006.
^ Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 3–5.
^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2021). “What are the safest and cleanest sources of energy?”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 15 January 2024. Data sources: Markandya & Wilkinson (2007); UNSCEAR (2008; 2018); Sovacool et al. (2016); IPCC AR5 (2014); Pehl et al. (2017); Ember Energy (2021).
^ Jump up to:^a ^b United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. 46.
^ “Global Historical Emissions”. Climate Watch. Archived from the original on 4 June 2021. Retrieved 19 August 2021.
^ Ge, Mengpin; Friedrich, Johannes; Vigna, Leandro (August 2021). “4 Charts Explain Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Countries and Sectors”. World Resources Institute. Archived from the original on 19 August 2021. Retrieved 19 August 2021.
^ “The Paris Agreement”. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Archived from the original on 19 March 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
^ Watts, Nick; Amann, Markus; Arnell, Nigel; Ayeb-Karlsson, Sonja; et al. (2021). “The 2020 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: responding to converging crises” (PDF). The Lancet. 397 (10269): 151. Bibcode:2021Lanc..397..129W. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32290-X. PMC 7616803. PMID 33278353.
^ “Every breath you take: The staggering, true cost of air pollution”. United Nations Development Programme. 4 June 2019. Archived from the original on 20 April 2021. Retrieved 4 May 2021.
^ “New WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines aim to save millions of lives from air pollution”. World Health Organization. 22 September 2021. Archived from the original on 23 September 2021. Retrieved 16 October 2021.
^ “Acid Rain and Water”. United States Geological Survey. Archived from the original on 27 June 2021. Retrieved 14 October 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b World Health Organization 2018, p. 16.
^ “Ambient (outdoor) air pollution”. World Health Organization. 22 September 2021. Archived from the original on 8 October 2021. Retrieved 22 October 2021.
^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2019). “Access to Energy”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 1 April 2021. Retrieved 1 April 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b World Health Organization 2016, pp. vii–xiv.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 118.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, pp. 470–472.
^ Tester et al. 2012, p. 504.
^ Kessides, Ioannis N.; Toman, Michael (28 July 2011). “The Global Energy Challenge”. World Bank. Archived from the original on 25 July 2019. Retrieved 27 September 2019.
^ Morris et al. 2015, pp. 24–27.
^ “Access to clean cooking”. SDG7: Data and Projections. IEA. October 2020. Archived from the original on 6 December 2019. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
^ IEA 2021, p. 167.
^ Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu (20 July 2022). “Winners and losers of energy sustainability—Global assessment of the Sustainable Development Goals”. Science of the Total Environment. 831. 154945. Bibcode:2022ScTEn.83154945S. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154945. hdl:11250/3023660. PMID 35367559.
^ Deputy Secretary-General (6 June 2018). “Sustainable Development Goal 7 on Reliable, Modern Energy ‘Golden Thread’ Linking All Other Targets, Deputy-Secretary-General Tells High-Level Panel” (Press release). United Nations. Archived from the original on 17 May 2021. Retrieved 19 March 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Goal 7: Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all”. SDG Tracker. Archived from the original on 2 February 2021. Retrieved 12 March 2021.
^ “Energy use per person”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 28 November 2020. Retrieved 16 July 2021.
^ “Europe 2030: Energy saving to become “first fuel””. EU Science Hub. European Commission. 25 February 2016. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
^ Motherway, Brian (19 December 2019). “Energy efficiency is the first fuel, and demand for it needs to grow”. IEA. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
^ “Energy Efficiency 2018: Analysis and outlooks to 2040”. IEA. October 2018. Archived from the original on 29 September 2020.
^ Fernandez Pales, Araceli; Bouckaert, Stéphanie; Abergel, Thibaut; Goodson, Timothy (10 June 2021). “Net zero by 2050 hinges on a global push to increase energy efficiency”. IEA. Archived from the original on 20 July 2021. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA 2021, pp. 68–69.
^ Mundaca, Luis; Ürge-Vorsatz, Diana; Wilson, Charlie (February 2019). “Demand-side approaches for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C”. Energy Efficiency. 12 (2): 343–362. Bibcode:2019EnEff..12..343M. doi:10.1007/s12053-018-9722-9.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA, IRENA, United Nations Statistics Division, World Bank, World Health Organization 2021, p. 12.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA, IRENA, United Nations Statistics Division, World Bank, World Health Organization 2021, p. 11.
^ Brockway, Paul E.; Sorrell, Steve; Semieniuk, Gregor; Heun, Matthew Kuperus; Court, Victor (May 2021). “Energy efficiency and economy-wide rebound effects: A review of the evidence and its implications”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 141: 110781. Bibcode:2021RSERv.14110781B. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110781.
^ “Energy Efficiency 2019”. IEA. November 2019. Archived from the original on 13 October 2020. Retrieved 21 September 2020.
^ Bond, Kingsmill; Butler-Sloss, Sam; Lovins, Amory; Speelman, Laurens; Topping, Nigel (13 June 2023). “Report / 2023 / X-Change: Electricity / On track for disruption”. Rocky Mountain Institute. Archived from the original on 13 July 2023.
^ Source for data beginning in 2017: “Renewable Energy Market Update Outlook for 2023 and 2024” (PDF). International Energy Agency. June 2023. p. 19. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 July 2023. IEA. CC BY 4.0. ● Source for data through 2016: “Renewable Energy Market Update / Outlook for 2021 and 2022” (PDF). IEA.org. International Energy Agency. May 2021. p. 8. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 March 2023. IEA. Licence: CC BY 4.0
^ “World Energy Investment 2023 / Overview and key findings”. International Energy Agency (IEA). 25 May 2023. Archived from the original on 31 May 2023. Global energy investment in clean energy and in fossil fuels, 2015-2023 (chart) — From pages 8 and 12 of World Energy Investment 2023 (archive).
^ IEA 2007, p. 3.
^ Santangeli, Andrea; Toivonen, Tuuli; Pouzols, Federico Montesino; Pogson, Mark; Hastings, Astley; Smith, Pete; Moilanen, Atte (September 2016). “Global change synergies and trade-offs between renewable energy and biodiversity”. GCB Bioenergy. 8 (5): 941–951. Bibcode:2016GCBBi…8..941S. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12299. hdl:2164/6138.
^ Rehbein, Jose A.; Watson, James E. M.; Lane, Joe L.; Sonter, Laura J.; Venter, Oscar; Atkinson, Scott C.; Allan, James R. (May 2020). “Renewable energy development threatens many globally important biodiversity areas”. Global Change Biology. 26 (5): 3040–3051. Bibcode:2020GCBio..26.3040R. doi:10.1111/gcb.15067. PMID 32133726.
^ Ritchie, Hannah (2019). “Renewable Energy”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 4 August 2020. Retrieved 31 July 2020.
^ Renewables 2020 Analysis and forecast to 2025 (PDF) (Report). IEA. 2020. p. 12. Archived from the original on 26 April 2021.
^ “Access to electricity”. SDG7: Data and Projections. IEA. 2020. Archived from the original on 13 May 2021. Retrieved 5 May 2021.
^ “Infrastructure Solutions: The power of purchase agreements”. European Investment Bank. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
^ “Renewable Power – Analysis”. IEA. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
^ “Global Electricity Review 2022”. Ember. 29 March 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
^ “Renewable Energy and Electricity | Sustainable Energy | Renewable Energy – World Nuclear Association”. world-nuclear.org. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA (2022), Renewables 2022, IEA, Paris https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2022, License: CC BY 4.0
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 406.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Wind & Solar Share in Electricity Production Data”. Global Energy Statistical Yearbook 2021. Enerdata. Archived from the original on 19 July 2019. Retrieved 13 June 2021.
^ Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 34–35.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Levelized Cost of Energy and of Storage”. Lazard. 19 October 2020. Archived from the original on 25 February 2021. Retrieved 26 February 2021.
^ Victoria, Marta; Haegel, Nancy; Peters, Ian Marius; Sinton, Ron; Jäger-Waldau, Arnulf; del Cañizo, Carlos; Breyer, Christian; Stocks, Matthew; Blakers, Andrew; Kaizuka, Izumi; Komoto, Keiichi; Smets, Arno (May 2021). “Solar photovoltaics is ready to power a sustainable future”. Joule. 5 (5): 1041–1056. Bibcode:2021Joule…5.1041V. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2021.03.005.
^ IRENA 2021, pp. 19, 22.
^ Goetz, Katelyn P.; Taylor, Alexander D.; Hofstetter, Yvonne J.; Vaynzof, Yana (13 January 2021). “Sustainability in Perovskite Solar Cells”. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 13 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1021/acsami.0c17269. PMID 33372760.
^ Xu, Yan; Li, Jinhui; Tan, Quanyin; Peters, Anesia Lauren; Yang, Congren (May 2018). “Global status of recycling waste solar panels: A review”. Waste Management. 75: 450–458. Bibcode:2018WaMan..75..450X. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.01.036. PMID 29472153.
^ Tian, Xueyu; Stranks, Samuel D.; You, Fengqi (31 July 2020). “Life cycle energy use and environmental implications of high-performance perovskite tandem solar cells”. Science Advances. 6 (31): eabb0055. Bibcode:2020SciA….6…55T. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb0055. PMC 7399695. PMID 32789177.
^ Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 35–36.
^ “Solar energy”. International Renewable Energy Agency. Archived from the original on 13 May 2021. Retrieved 5 June 2021.
^ REN21 2020, p. 124.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 366.
^ “What are the advantages and disadvantages of offshore wind farms?”. American Geosciences Institute. 12 May 2016. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
^ Szarka 2007, p. 176.
^ Wang, Shifeng; Wang, Sicong (September 2015). “Impacts of wind energy on environment: A review”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 49: 437–443. Bibcode:2015RSERv..49..437W. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.137.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 215.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 213.
^ Huang, Yu-Fong; Gan, Xing-Jia; Chiueh, Pei-Te (March 2017). “Life cycle assessment and net energy analysis of offshore wind power systems”. Renewable Energy. 102: 98–106. Bibcode:2017REne..102…98H. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2016.10.050.
^ Belton, Padraig (7 February 2020). “What happens to all the old wind turbines?”. BBC. Archived from the original on 23 February 2021. Retrieved 27 February 2021.
^ Smil 2017b, p. 286.
^ REN21 2021, p. 21.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Moran, Emilio F.; Lopez, Maria Claudia; Moore, Nathan; Müller, Norbert; Hyndman, David W. (20 November 2018). “Sustainable hydropower in the 21st century”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115 (47): 11891–11898. Bibcode:2018PNAS..11511891M. doi:10.1073/pnas.1809426115. PMC 6255148. PMID 30397145.
^ Kumar, A.; Schei, T.; Ahenkorah, A.; Caceres Rodriguez, R. et al. “Hydropower“. In IPCC (2011), pp. 451, 462, 488.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Schlömer, S.; Bruckner, T.; Fulton, L.; Hertwich, E. et al. “Annex III: Technology-specific cost and performance parameters“. In IPCC (2014), p. 1335.
^ Almeida, Rafael M.; Shi, Qinru; Gomes-Selman, Jonathan M.; Wu, Xiaojian; Xue, Yexiang; Angarita, Hector; Barros, Nathan; Forsberg, Bruce R.; García-Villacorta, Roosevelt; Hamilton, Stephen K.; Melack, John M.; Montoya, Mariana; Perez, Guillaume; Sethi, Suresh A.; Gomes, Carla P.; Flecker, Alexander S. (19 September 2019). “Reducing greenhouse gas emissions of Amazon hydropower with strategic dam planning”. Nature Communications. 10 (1): 4281. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12179-5. PMC 6753097. PMID 31537792.
^ László, Erika (1981). “Geothermal Energy: An Old Ally”. Ambio. 10 (5): 248–249. JSTOR 4312703.
^ REN21 2020, p. 97.
^ “Geothermal Energy Information and Facts”. National Geographic. 19 October 2009. Archived from the original on 8 August 2021. Retrieved 8 August 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2020). “Energy mix”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 2 July 2021. Retrieved 9 July 2021.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, pp. 222, 228.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, pp. 228–229.
^ “Biomass explained”. US Energy Information Administration. 8 June 2021. Archived from the original on 15 September 2021. Retrieved 13 September 2021.
^ Kopetz, Heinz (7 February 2013). “Build a biomass energy market”. Nature. 494 (7435): 29–31. doi:10.1038/494029a. PMID 23389528.
^ Demirbas, Ayhan (August 2008). “Biofuels sources, biofuel policy, biofuel economy and global biofuel projections”. Energy Conversion and Management. 49 (8): 2106–2116. Bibcode:2008ECM….49.2106D. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2008.02.020.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Correa, Diego F.; Beyer, Hawthorne L.; Fargione, Joseph E.; Hill, Jason D.; Possingham, Hugh P.; Thomas-Hall, Skye R.; Schenk, Peer M. (June 2019). “Towards the implementation of sustainable biofuel production systems”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 107: 250–263. Bibcode:2019RSERv.107..250C. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.005.
^ Daley, Jason (24 April 2018). “The EPA Declared That Burning Wood Is Carbon Neutral. It’s Actually a Lot More Complicated”. Smithsonian Magazine. Archived from the original on 30 June 2021. Retrieved 14 September 2021.
^ Tester et al. 2012, p. 512.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Smil 2017a, p. 162.
^ World Health Organization 2016, p. 73.
^ IPCC 2014, p. 616.
^ “Biofuels explained: Ethanol”. US Energy Information Administration. 18 June 2020. Archived from the original on 14 May 2021. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
^ Foley, Jonathan (5 March 2013). “It’s Time to Rethink America’s Corn System”. Scientific American. Archived from the original on 3 January 2020. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
^ Ayompe, Lacour M.; Schaafsma, M.; Egoh, Benis N. (January 2021). “Towards sustainable palm oil production: The positive and negative impacts on ecosystem services and human wellbeing”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 278: 123914. Bibcode:2021JCPro.27823914A. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123914.
^ Lustgarten, Abrahm (20 November 2018). “Palm Oil Was Supposed to Help Save the Planet. Instead It Unleashed a Catastrophe”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 17 May 2019. Retrieved 15 May 2019.
^ Smil 2017a, p. 161.
^ National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2019, p. 3.
^ REN21 2021, pp. 113–116.
^ “The Role of Gas: Key Findings”. IEA. July 2019. Archived from the original on 1 September 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
^ “Natural gas and the environment”. US Energy Information Administration. Archived from the original on 2 April 2021. Retrieved 28 March 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Storrow, Benjamin. “Methane Leaks Erase Some of the Climate Benefits of Natural Gas”. Scientific American. Retrieved 31 May 2023.
^ Plumer, Brad (26 June 2019). “As Coal Fades in the U.S., Natural Gas Becomes the Climate Battleground”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 23 September 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
^ Gürsan, C.; de Gooyert, V. (March 2021). “The systemic impact of a transition fuel: Does natural gas help or hinder the energy transition?”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 138: 110552. Bibcode:2021RSERv.13810552G. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110552. hdl:2066/228782.
^ Budinis, Sara; Krevor, Samuel; Dowell, Niall Mac; Brandon, Nigel; Hawkes, Adam (November 2018). “An assessment of CCS costs, barriers and potential”. Energy Strategy Reviews. 22: 61–81. Bibcode:2018EneSR..22…61B. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2018.08.003.
^ “Zero-emission carbon capture and storage in power plants using higher capture rates”. IEA. 7 January 2021. Archived from the original on 30 March 2021. Retrieved 14 March 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Ritchie, Hannah (10 February 2020). “What are the safest and cleanest sources of energy?”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 29 November 2020. Retrieved 14 March 2021.
^ Evans, Simon (8 December 2017). “Solar, wind and nuclear have ‘amazingly low’ carbon footprints, study finds”. Carbon Brief. Archived from the original on 16 March 2021. Retrieved 15 March 2021.
^ IPCC 2018, 5.4.1.2.
^ IPCC AR6 WG3 2022, p. 38.
^ “Global Status Report 2024”. Global CCS Institute. pp. 57–58. Retrieved 19 October 2024. The report lists 50 facilities, of which 3 are direct air capture facilities and 3 are transport/storage facilities
^ Roser, Max (10 December 2020). “The world’s energy problem”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 21 July 2021. Retrieved 21 July 2021.
^ Rhodes, Richard (19 July 2018). “Why Nuclear Power Must Be Part of the Energy Solution”. Yale Environment 360. Yale School of the Environment. Archived from the original on 9 August 2021. Retrieved 24 July 2021.
^ “Nuclear Power in the World Today”. World Nuclear Association. June 2021. Archived from the original on 16 July 2021. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
^ Bailey, Ronald (10 May 2023). “New study: Nuclear power is humanity’s greenest energy option”. Reason.com. Retrieved 22 May 2023.
^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2020). “Nuclear Energy”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 20 July 2021. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
^ MacKay 2008, p. 162.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Gill, Matthew; Livens, Francis; Peakman, Aiden (2014). “Nuclear Fission”. Future Energy. pp. 135–149. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102886-5.00007-4. ISBN 978-0-08-102886-5.
^ Muellner, Nikolaus; Arnold, Nikolaus; Gufler, Klaus; Kromp, Wolfgang; Renneberg, Wolfgang; Liebert, Wolfgang (August 2021). “Nuclear energy – The solution to climate change?”. Energy Policy. 155: 112363. Bibcode:2021EnPol.15512363M. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112363.
^ IPCC 2018, 2.4.2.1.
^ Timmer, John (21 November 2020). “Why are nuclear plants so expensive? Safety’s only part of the story”. Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 28 April 2021. Retrieved 17 March 2021.
^ Technical assessment of nuclear energy with respect to the ‘do no significant harm’ criteria of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (‘Taxonomy Regulation’) (PDF) (Report). European Commission Joint Research Centre. 2021. p. 53. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 April 2021.
^ Locatelli, Giorgio; Mignacca, Benito (2020). “Small Modular Nuclear Reactors”. Future Energy. pp. 151–169. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102886-5.00008-6. ISBN 978-0-08-102886-5.
^ McGrath, Matt (6 November 2019). “Nuclear fusion is ‘a question of when, not if'”. BBC. Archived from the original on 25 January 2021. Retrieved 13 February 2021.
^ Amos, Jonathan (9 February 2022). “Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy”. BBC. Archived from the original on 1 March 2022. Retrieved 10 February 2022.
^ “Energy Transition Investment Now On Par with Fossil Fuel”. Bloomberg NEF (New Energy Finance). 10 February 2023. Archived from the original on 27 March 2023.
^ Jaccard 2020, pp. 202–203, Chapter 11 – “Renewables Have Won”.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d IPCC 2014, 7.11.3.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 106–110.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Evans, Simon; Gabbatiss, Josh (30 November 2020). “In-depth Q&A: Does the world need hydrogen to solve climate change?”. Carbon Brief. Archived from the original on 1 December 2020. Retrieved 1 December 2020.
^ Jaccard 2020, p. 203, Chapter 11 – “Renewables Have Won”.
^ “Reaching net zero emissions demands faster innovation, but we’ve already come a long way – Analysis”. International Energy Agency. 13 November 2023. Retrieved 30 April 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA 2021, p. 15.
^ “Innovation – Energy System”. International Energy Agency. Retrieved 30 April 2024.
^ World Health Organization 2018, Executive Summary.
^ Vandyck, T.; Keramidas, K.; Kitous, A.; Spadaro, J.V.; et al. (2018). “Air quality co-benefits for human health and agriculture counterbalance costs to meet Paris Agreement pledges”. Nature Communications. 9 (1): 4939. Bibcode:2018NatCo…9.4939V. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06885-9. PMC 6250710. PMID 30467311.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations Environment Programme 2019, pp. 46–55.
^ IPCC 2018, p. 97.
^ Hopwood, David (May 2007). “Blueprint for sustainability?”. Refocus. 8 (3): 54–57. doi:10.1016/S1471-0846(07)70068-9.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. 47.
^ “Introduction to System Integration of Renewables”. IEA. Archived from the original on 15 May 2020. Retrieved 30 May 2020.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Blanco, Herib; Faaij, André (January 2018). “A review at the role of storage in energy systems with a focus on Power to Gas and long-term storage” (PDF). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 81: 1049–1086. Bibcode:2018RSERv..81.1049B. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.062.
^ REN21 2020, p. 177.
^ Bloess, Andreas; Schill, Wolf-Peter; Zerrahn, Alexander (February 2018). “Power-to-heat for renewable energy integration: A review of technologies, modeling approaches, and flexibility potentials”. Applied Energy. 212: 1611–1626. Bibcode:2018ApEn..212.1611B. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.073. hdl:10419/200120.
^ IEA 2020, p. 109.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Koohi-Fayegh, S.; Rosen, M.A. (February 2020). “A review of energy storage types, applications and recent developments”. Journal of Energy Storage. 27: 101047. Bibcode:2020JEnSt..2701047K. doi:10.1016/j.est.2019.101047.
^ Katz, Cheryl (17 December 2020). “The batteries that could make fossil fuels obsolete”. BBC. Archived from the original on 11 January 2021. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Climate change and batteries: the search for future power storage solutions” (PDF). Climate change: science and solutions. The Royal Society. 19 May 2021. Archived from the original on 16 October 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
^ Hunt, Julian D.; Byers, Edward; Wada, Yoshihide; Parkinson, Simon; Gernaat, David E. H. J.; Langan, Simon; van Vuuren, Detlef P.; Riahi, Keywan (19 February 2020). “Global resource potential of seasonal pumped hydropower storage for energy and water storage”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 947. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11..947H. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14555-y. PMC 7031375. PMID 32075965.
^ Balaraman, Kavya (12 October 2020). “To batteries and beyond: With seasonal storage potential, hydrogen offers ‘a different ballgame entirely'”. Utility Dive. Archived from the original on 18 January 2021. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
^ Cole, Laura (15 November 2020). “How to cut carbon out of your heating”. BBC. Archived from the original on 27 August 2021. Retrieved 31 August 2021.
^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2020). “Electricity Mix”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 13 October 2021. Retrieved 16 October 2021.
^ IPCC 2018, 2.4.2.2.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 167–169.
^ United Nations Development Programme 2016, p. 30.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Herrington, Richard (24 May 2021). “Mining our green future”. Nature Reviews Materials. 6 (6): 456–458. Bibcode:2021NatRM…6..456H. doi:10.1038/s41578-021-00325-9.
^ Mudd, Gavin M. “Metals and Elements Needed to Support Future Energy Systems”. In Letcher (2020), pp. 723–724.
^ Babbitt, Callie W. (August 2020). “Sustainability perspectives on lithium-ion batteries”. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 22 (6): 1213–1214. Bibcode:2020CTEP…22.1213B. doi:10.1007/s10098-020-01890-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c IPCC AR6 WG3 2022, pp. 91–92.
^ Evans, Simon; Gabbatiss, Josh (30 November 2020). “In-depth Q&A: Does the world need hydrogen to solve climate change?”. Carbon Brief. Archived from the original on 1 December 2020. Retrieved 1 December 2020.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Lewis, Alastair C. (10 June 2021). “Optimising air quality co-benefits in a hydrogen economy: a case for hydrogen-specific standards for NO x emissions”. Environmental Science: Atmospheres. 1 (5): 201–207. Bibcode:2021ESAt….1..201L. doi:10.1039/D1EA00037C. This article incorporates text from this source, which is available under the CC BY 3.0 license.
^ Reed, Stanley; Ewing, Jack (13 July 2021). “Hydrogen Is One Answer to Climate Change. Getting It Is the Hard Part”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 14 July 2021. Retrieved 14 July 2021.
^ IRENA 2019, p. 9.
^ Bonheure, Mike; Vandewalle, Laurien A.; Marin, Guy B.; Van Geem, Kevin M. (March 2021). “Dream or Reality? Electrification of the Chemical Process Industries”. CEP Magazine. American Institute of Chemical Engineers. Archived from the original on 17 July 2021. Retrieved 6 July 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Griffiths, Steve; Sovacool, Benjamin K.; Kim, Jinsoo; Bazilian, Morgan; Uratani, Joao M. (October 2021). “Industrial decarbonization via hydrogen: A critical and systematic review of developments, socio-technical systems and policy options”. Energy Research & Social Science. 80: 102208. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102208.
^ Palys, Matthew J.; Daoutidis, Prodromos (May 2020). “Using hydrogen and ammonia for renewable energy storage: A geographically comprehensive techno-economic study”. Computers & Chemical Engineering. 136: 106785. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106785.
^ IRENA 2021, pp. 12, 22.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 15, 75–76.
^ Kjellberg-Motton, Brendan (7 February 2022). “Steel decarbonisation gathers speed | Argus Media”. www.argusmedia.com. Retrieved 7 September 2023.
^ Blank, Thomas; Molly, Patrick (January 2020). “Hydrogen’s Decarbonization Impact for Industry” (PDF). Rocky Mountain Institute. pp. 2, 7, 8. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 September 2020.
^ Plötz, Patrick (31 January 2022). “Hydrogen technology is unlikely to play a major role in sustainable road transport”. Nature Electronics. 5 (1): 8–10. doi:10.1038/s41928-021-00706-6.
^ Fraser, Simon D.S.; Lock, Karen (December 2011). “Cycling for transport and public health: a systematic review of the effect of the environment on cycling”. European Journal of Public Health. 21 (6): 738–743. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckq145. PMID 20929903.
^ “Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data”. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 12 January 2016. Archived from the original on 5 December 2019. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
^ Bigazzi, Alexander (May 2019). “Comparison of marginal and average emission factors for passenger transportation modes”. Applied Energy. 242: 1460–1466. Bibcode:2019ApEn..242.1460B. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.172.
^ Schäfer, Andreas W.; Yeh, Sonia (20 April 2020). “A holistic analysis of passenger travel energy and greenhouse gas intensities”. Nature Sustainability. 3 (6): 459–462. Bibcode:2020NatSu…3..459S. doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0514-9.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2020, p. xxv.
^ IEA 2021, p. 137.
^ Pucher, John; Buehler, Ralph (2 November 2017). “Cycling towards a more sustainable transport future”. Transport Reviews. 37 (6): 689–694. doi:10.1080/01441647.2017.1340234.
^ Smith, John (22 September 2016). “Sustainable transport”. European Commission. Archived from the original on 22 October 2021. Retrieved 22 October 2021.
^ Knobloch, Florian; Hanssen, Steef V.; Lam, Aileen; Pollitt, Hector; Salas, Pablo; Chewpreecha, Unnada; Huijbregts, Mark A. J.; Mercure, Jean-Francois (23 March 2020). “Net emission reductions from electric cars and heat pumps in 59 world regions over time”. Nature Sustainability. 3 (6): 437–447. Bibcode:2020NatSu…3..437K. doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0488-7. PMC 7308170. PMID 32572385.
^ Bogdanov, Dmitrii; Farfan, Javier; Sadovskaia, Kristina; Aghahosseini, Arman; Child, Michael; Gulagi, Ashish; Oyewo, Ayobami Solomon; de Souza Noel Simas Barbosa, Larissa; Breyer, Christian (6 March 2019). “Radical transformation pathway towards sustainable electricity via evolutionary steps”. Nature Communications. 10 (1). doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08855-1. PMC 6403340. PMID 30842423.
^ Martini, Giorgio; Grigoratos, Theodoros (2014). Non-exhaust traffic related emissions – Brake and tyre wear PM. EUR 26648. Publications Office of the European Union. p. 42. ISBN 978-92-79-38303-8. OCLC 1044281650. Archived from the original on 30 July 2021.
^ Non-exhaust Particulate Emissions from Road Transport. 2020. pp. 8–9. doi:10.1787/4a4dc6ca-en. ISBN 978-92-64-45244-2.
^ “CO₂ performance of new passenger cars in Europe”. www.eea.europa.eu. Retrieved 19 October 2022.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 133–137.
^ “Rail and waterborne – best for low-carbon motorised transport”. European Environment Agency. Archived from the original on 9 October 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
^ Miller, Joe (9 September 2020). “Hydrogen takes a back seat to electric for passenger vehicles”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 20 September 2020. Retrieved 9 September 2020.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 136, 139.
^ Biomass in a low-carbon economy (Report). UK Committee on Climate Change. November 2018. p. 18. Archived from the original on 28 December 2019. Retrieved 28 December 2019.
^ “Buildings”. IEA. Archived from the original on 14 October 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
^ Mortensen, Anders Winther; Mathiesen, Brian Vad; Hansen, Anders Bavnhøj; Pedersen, Sigurd Lauge; Grandal, Rune Duban; Wenzel, Henrik (October 2020). “The role of electrification and hydrogen in breaking the biomass bottleneck of the renewable energy system – A study on the Danish energy system”. Applied Energy. 275: 115331. Bibcode:2020ApEn..27515331M. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115331.
^ Knobloch, Florian; Pollitt, Hector; Chewpreecha, Unnada; Daioglou, Vassilis; Mercure, Jean-Francois (February 2019). “Simulating the deep decarbonisation of residential heating for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C”. Energy Efficiency. 12 (2): 521–550. arXiv:1710.11019. Bibcode:2019EnEff..12..521K. doi:10.1007/s12053-018-9710-0.
^ Alva, Guruprasad; Lin, Yaxue; Fang, Guiyin (February 2018). “An overview of thermal energy storage systems”. Energy. 144: 341–378. Bibcode:2018Ene…144..341A. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.037.
^ Plumer, Brad (30 June 2021). “Are ‘Heat Pumps’ the Answer to Heat Waves? Some Cities Think So”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 10 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
^ Abergel, Thibaut (June 2020). “Heat Pumps”. IEA. Archived from the original on 3 March 2021. Retrieved 12 April 2021.
^ Buffa, Simone; Cozzini, Marco; D’Antoni, Matteo; Baratieri, Marco; et al. (2019). “5th generation district heating and cooling systems: A review of existing cases in Europe”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 104: 504–522. Bibcode:2019RSERv.104..504B. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.059.
^ Lund, Henrik; Werner, Sven; Wiltshire, Robin; Svendsen, Svend; et al. (2014). “4th Generation District Heating (4GDH)”. Energy. 68: 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.089. Archived from the original on 7 March 2021. Retrieved 13 June 2021.
^ Abdolhamidi, Shervin (27 September 2018). “An ancient engineering feat that harnessed the wind”. BBC. Archived from the original on 12 August 2021. Retrieved 12 August 2021.
^ “How cities are using nature to keep heatwaves at bay”. United Nations Environment Programme. 22 July 2020. Archived from the original on 11 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Four Things You Should Know About Sustainable Cooling”. World Bank. 23 May 2019. Archived from the original on 11 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
^ Mastrucci, Alessio; Byers, Edward; Pachauri, Shonali; Rao, Narasimha D. (March 2019). “Improving the SDG energy poverty targets: Residential cooling needs in the Global South”. Energy and Buildings. 186: 405–415. Bibcode:2019EneBu.186..405M. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.01.015.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Smith & Pillarisetti 2017, pp. 145–146.
^ “Cooking appliances”. Natural Resources Canada. 16 January 2013. Archived from the original on 30 July 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2021.
^ World Health Organization; International Energy Agency; Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves; United Nations Development Programme; Energising Development; and World Bank (2018). Accelerating SDG 7 Achievement Policy Brief 02: Achieving Universal Access to Clean and Modern Cooking Fuels, Technologies and Services (PDF) (Report). United Nations. p. 3. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 March 2021.
^ World Health Organization 2016, p. 75.
^ IPCC 2014, p. 29.
^ World Health Organization 2016, p. 12.
^ REN21 2020, p. 40.
^ IEA 2020, p. 135.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. 50.
^ Åhman, Max; Nilsson, Lars J.; Johansson, Bengt (4 July 2017). “Global climate policy and deep decarbonization of energy-intensive industries”. Climate Policy. 17 (5): 634–649. Bibcode:2017CliPo..17..634A. doi:10.1080/14693062.2016.1167009.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. xxiii.
^ IEA 2021, p. 186.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c United Nations Environment Programme 2019, pp. 39–45.
^ Jaccard 2020, p. 109, Chapter 6 – We Must Price Carbon Emissions”.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b United Nations Environment Programme 2019, pp. 28–36.
^ Ciucci, M. (February 2020). “Renewable Energy”. European Parliament. Archived from the original on 4 June 2020. Retrieved 3 June 2020.
^ “State Renewable Portfolio Standards and Goals”. National Conference of State Legislators. 17 April 2020. Archived from the original on 3 June 2020. Retrieved 3 June 2020.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 14–25.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 184–187.
^ IEA 2021, p. 16.
^ Jaccard 2020, pp. 106–109, Chapter 6 – “We Must Price Carbon Emissions”.
^ Plumer, Brad (8 October 2018). “New U.N. Climate Report Says Put a High Price on Carbon”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 27 September 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
^ Green, Jessica F (April 2021). “Does carbon pricing reduce emissions? A review of ex-post analyses”. Environmental Research Letters. 16 (4): 043004. Bibcode:2021ERL….16d3004G. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abdae9.
^ IPCC 2018, 2.5.2.1.
^ State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2019 (PDF) (Report). World Bank. June 2019. pp. 8–11. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1435-8. hdl:10986/29687. ISBN 978-1-4648-1435-8. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 May 2020.
^ “Revenue-Neutral Carbon Tax | Canada”. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Archived from the original on 28 October 2019. Retrieved 28 October 2019.
^ Carr, Mathew (10 October 2018). “How High Does Carbon Need to Be? Somewhere From $20–$27,000”. Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 5 August 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
^ “EAC launches new inquiry weighing up carbon border tax measures”. UK Parliament. 24 September 2021. Archived from the original on 24 September 2021. Retrieved 14 October 2021.
^ Plumer, Brad (14 July 2021). “Europe Is Proposing a Border Carbon Tax. What Is It and How Will It Work?”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 10 September 2021. Retrieved 10 September 2021.
^ Bharti, Bianca (12 August 2021). “Taxing imports of heavy carbon emitters is gaining momentum – and it could hurt Canadian industry: Report”. Financial Post. Archived from the original on 3 October 2021. Retrieved 3 October 2021.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2020, p. vii.
^ IEA 2021, p. 13.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 14–18.
^ IRENA, IEA & REN21 2018, p. 19.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “24 million jobs to open up in the green economy”. International Labour Organization. 14 May 2018. Archived from the original on 2 June 2021. Retrieved 30 May 2021.
^ Catsaros, Oktavia (26 January 2023). “Global Low-Carbon Energy Technology Investment Surges Past $1 Trillion for the First Time”. Bloomberg NEF (New Energy Finance). Figure 1. Archived from the original on 22 May 2023. Defying supply chain disruptions and macroeconomic headwinds, 2022 energy transition investment jumped 31% to draw level with fossil fuels
^ “Global Clean Energy Investment Jumps 17%, Hits $1.8 Trillion in 2023, According to BloombergNEF Report”. BNEF.com. Bloomberg NEF. 30 January 2024. Archived from the original on 28 June 2024. Start years differ by sector but all sectors are present from 2020 onwards.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b 2024 data: “Energy Transition Investment Trends 2025 / Abridged report” (PDF). BloombergNEF. 30 January 2025. p. 9. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 February 2025.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Mazzucato, Mariana; Semieniuk, Gregor (February 2018). “Financing renewable energy: Who is financing what and why it matters”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 127: 8–22. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.021.
^ United Nations Development Programme & United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2019, p. 24.
^ IPCC 2018, p. 96.
^ IEA, IRENA, United Nations Statistics Division, World Bank, World Health Organization 2021, pp. 129, 132.
^ United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2018, p. 54.
^ United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2018, p. 9.
^ Roberts, J. Timmons; Weikmans, Romain; Robinson, Stacy-ann; Ciplet, David; Khan, Mizan; Falzon, Danielle (March 2021). “Rebooting a failed promise of climate finance”. Nature Climate Change. 11 (3): 180–182. Bibcode:2021NatCC..11..180R. doi:10.1038/s41558-021-00990-2.
^ Radwanski, Adam (29 September 2021). “Opinion: As pivotal climate summit approaches, Canada at centre of efforts to repair broken trust among poorer countries”. The Globe and Mail. Archived from the original on 30 September 2021. Retrieved 30 September 2021.
^ “Here are the clean energy innovations that will beat climate change”. European Investment Bank. Retrieved 26 September 2022.
^ “Home”. www.oecd-ilibrary.org. Retrieved 19 October 2022.
^ Bridle, Richard; Sharma, Shruti; Mostafa, Mostafa; Geddes, Anna (June 2019). “Fossil Fuel to Clean Energy Subsidy Swaps: How to pay for an energy revolution” (PDF). International Institute for Sustainable Development. p. iv. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 November 2019.
^ Watts, Nick; Amann, Markus; Arnell, Nigel; Ayeb-Karlsson, Sonja; Belesova, Kristine; Boykoff, Maxwell; Byass, Peter; Cai, Wenjia; Campbell-Lendrum, Diarmid; Capstick, Stuart; Chambers, Jonathan; Dalin, Carole; Daly, Meaghan; Dasandi, Niheer; Davies, Michael; Drummond, Paul; Dubrow, Robert; Ebi, Kristie L; Eckelman, Matthew; Ekins, Paul; Escobar, Luis E; Fernandez Montoya, Lucia; Georgeson, Lucien; Graham, Hilary; Haggar, Paul; Hamilton, Ian; Hartinger, Stella; Hess, Jeremy; Kelman, Ilan; Kiesewetter, Gregor; Kjellstrom, Tord; Kniveton, Dominic; Lemke, Bruno; Liu, Yang; Lott, Melissa; Lowe, Rachel; Sewe, Maquins Odhiambo; Martinez-Urtaza, Jaime; Maslin, Mark; McAllister, Lucy; McGushin, Alice; Jankin Mikhaylov, Slava; Milner, James; Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar; Morrissey, Karyn; Murray, Kris; Munzert, Simon; Nilsson, Maria; Neville, Tara; Oreszczyn, Tadj; Owfi, Fereidoon; Pearman, Olivia; Pencheon, David; Phung, Dung; Pye, Steve; Quinn, Ruth; Rabbaniha, Mahnaz; Robinson, Elizabeth; Rocklöv, Joacim; Semenza, Jan C; Sherman, Jodi; Shumake-Guillemot, Joy; Tabatabaei, Meisam; Taylor, Jonathon; Trinanes, Joaquin; Wilkinson, Paul; Costello, Anthony; Gong, Peng; Montgomery, Hugh (November 2019). “The 2019 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: ensuring that the health of a child born today is not defined by a changing climate”. The Lancet. 394 (10211): 1836–1878. Bibcode:2019Lanc..394.1836W. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32596-6. PMC 7616843. PMID 31733928.
^ United Nations Development Programme 2020, p. 10.
^ Kuzemko, Caroline; Bradshaw, Michael; Bridge, Gavin; Goldthau, Andreas; Jewell, Jessica; Overland, Indra; Scholten, Daniel; Van de Graaf, Thijs; Westphal, Kirsten (October 2020). “Covid-19 and the politics of sustainable energy transitions”. Energy Research & Social Science. 68: 101685. Bibcode:2020ERSS…6801685K. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101685. PMC 7330551. PMID 32839704.
^ IRENA 2021, p. 5.

Sustainable technology of 4170 ?

What is Sustainable technology of 4170 ?

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4170 ?

When is required Sustainable technology of 4170 ?

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4170 ?

How is required Sustainable technology of 4170 ?

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4170 ?

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4170 ?

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4170 ?

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4170 ?

References

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply