Sustainable Technology of 3010

79 / 100

Sustainable Technology of 3010 ?

It’s impossible to predict the exact nature of sustainable technology in 3010. However, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and potential future developments:

Possible Trends:

Advanced Renewable Energy: Solar, wind, and other renewable energy sources will likely be highly advanced and efficient, potentially incorporating space-based solar power or other innovative energy generation methods.
Closed-Loop Systems: Technologies will likely focus on creating closed-loop systems for resource utilization, minimizing waste and maximizing recycling and reuse.
Biomimicry: Technologies may increasingly draw inspiration from nature, mimicking biological processes for energy production, materials science, and other applications.
Localized Production: Sustainable technologies may favor localized production and consumption, reducing transportation needs and supporting circular economies.
Smart Infrastructure: Cities and infrastructure will likely be highly intelligent, optimizing resource use and minimizing environmental impact through interconnected systems.
Advanced Materials: Sustainable technologies may rely on advanced materials with unique properties, such as self-healing materials, biodegradable plastics, or materials that can capture and store carbon.
Artificial Intelligence: AI could play a significant role in optimizing energy use, managing resources, and developing new sustainable technologies.

Challenges:

Resource Depletion: Even with advanced technologies, resource depletion could pose a challenge, requiring innovative solutions for material sourcing and recycling.
Climate Change: Continued climate change impacts could necessitate the development of technologies to mitigate extreme weather events and adapt to changing environments.
Ethical Considerations: As technologies advance, ethical considerations around their development and deployment will become increasingly important.

Overall, sustainable technology in 3010 will likely be characterized by:

High efficiency: Technologies will be designed to maximize output while minimizing resource input and waste.
Resilience: Systems will be designed to withstand environmental changes and disruptions.
Harmony with nature: Technologies will aim to integrate with natural ecosystems and minimize their impact.
Social equity: Sustainable technologies will be developed and deployed in ways that promote social equity and access to resources.

It’s important to remember that these are just educated guesses. The actual nature of sustainable technology in 3010 will depend on a variety of factors, including scientific advancements, societal choices, and unforeseen challenge

What is Sustainable Technology of 3010 ?

It’s impossible to predict the exact nature of sustainable technology in 3010. However, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and potential future developments:

Possible Trends:

Advanced Renewable Energy: Solar, wind, and other renewable energy sources will likely be highly advanced and efficient, potentially incorporating space-based solar power or other innovative energy generation methods.
Closed-Loop Systems: Technologies will likely focus on creating closed-loop systems for resource utilization, minimizing waste and maximizing recycling and reuse.
Biomimicry: Technologies may increasingly draw inspiration from nature, mimicking biological processes for energy production, materials science, and other applications.
Localized Production: Sustainable technologies may favor localized production and consumption, reducing transportation needs and supporting circular economies.
Smart Infrastructure: Cities and infrastructure will likely be highly intelligent, optimizing resource use and minimizing environmental impact through interconnected systems.
Advanced Materials: Sustainable technologies may rely on advanced materials with unique properties, such as self-healing materials, biodegradable plastics, or materials that can capture and store carbon.
Artificial Intelligence: AI could play a significant role in optimizing energy use, managing resources, and developing new sustainable technologies.

Challenges:

Resource Depletion: Even with advanced technologies, resource depletion could pose a challenge, requiring innovative solutions for material sourcing and recycling.
Climate Change: Continued climate change impacts could necessitate the development of technologies to mitigate extreme weather events and adapt to changing environments.
Ethical Considerations: As technologies advance, ethical considerations around their development and deployment will become increasingly important.

Overall, sustainable technology in 3010 will likely be characterized by:

High efficiency: Technologies will be designed to maximize output while minimizing resource input and waste.
Resilience: Systems will be designed to withstand environmental changes and disruptions.
Harmony with nature: Technologies will aim to integrate with natural ecosystems and minimize their impact.
Social equity: Sustainable technologies will be developed and deployed in ways that promote social equity and access to resources.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3010 ?

It’s more accurate to say that sustainable technology in 3010 will be essential for everyone. Here’s why:

Resource Scarcity: Even with advancements, resources are finite. By 3010, depletion of key resources may be a significant challenge, making sustainable technologies crucial for basic survival.
Environmental Degradation: Climate change and pollution could create increasingly harsh living conditions. Sustainable technologies will be needed to mitigate these effects and ensure habitable environments.
Population Growth: If the global population continues to grow, sustainable technologies will be necessary to provide for everyone’s needs without exceeding the planet’s carrying capacity.
Economic Stability: Sustainable technologies can foster a circular economy, creating jobs and ensuring long-term economic prosperity.
Social Equity: Sustainable technologies can help bridge the gap between rich and poor by ensuring access to essential resources and opportunities for all.

In essence, sustainable technology in 3010 will be vital for:

Individuals: For access to food, water, shelter, and a healthy environment.
Communities: For building resilient infrastructure, fostering social cohesion, and maintaining cultural heritage.
Nations: For economic development, resource security, and global cooperation.
The Planet: For preserving biodiversity, maintaining ecosystem balance, and ensuring the long-term health of the Earth.

Ultimately, sustainable technology in 3010 will be a necessity for the survival and well-being of humanity and the planet.Sources and related content

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3010 ?

While it’s difficult to pinpoint an exact date for when sustainable technology will be absolutely required by 3010, it’s safe to say that the need for it will be increasingly urgent and critical in the centuries leading up to that point. Here’s a breakdown of the timeline:

Present – Near Future (Now – 2050):

Growing Importance: Sustainable technologies are already becoming increasingly important as we face the impacts of climate change, resource depletion, and environmental degradation.
Government Initiatives: Many governments are implementing policies and regulations to promote the adoption of sustainable technologies.
Corporate Responsibility: Businesses are increasingly recognizing the importance of sustainability for their long-term success and are investing in sustainable technologies.
Consumer Demand: Consumers are becoming more aware of environmental issues and are demanding more sustainable products and services.

Mid-Term Future (2050 – 2100):

Widespread Adoption: Sustainable technologies will likely become more widespread as their benefits become more apparent and costs decrease.
Technological Advancements: Significant advancements in sustainable technologies are expected, making them more efficient and effective.
Increased Urgency: The need for sustainable technologies will become more urgent as the impacts of climate change and resource depletion intensify.

Long-Term Future (2100 – 3010):

Essential for Survival: By 3010, sustainable technologies will likely be essential for human survival and well-being.
Integrated Systems: Sustainable technologies will likely be deeply integrated into all aspects of society, from energy production and transportation to agriculture and manufacturing.
Global Cooperation: International cooperation will be crucial for developing and deploying sustainable technologies on a global scale.

It’s important to note that this is a general timeline, and the specific requirements for sustainable technology will vary depending on various factors, such as:

The severity of climate change and environmental degradation.
The rate of technological advancements.
The level of societal and political commitment to sustainability.

Ultimately, the need for sustainable technology in 3010 will be a culmination of the choices we make today and in the coming centuries. The sooner we prioritize the development and adoption of sustainable technologies, the better equipped we will be to face the challenges of the future.Sources and related content

COURTESY : RBC

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3010 ?

By 3010, sustainable technology will be needed everywhere that human activity takes place. This includes:

Urban Centers: Cities will rely on sustainable technologies for energy, water management, waste disposal, transportation, and building materials.
Rural Areas: Sustainable agriculture, resource management, and infrastructure will be crucial for supporting rural communities and preserving natural ecosystems.
Industrial Zones: Manufacturing and production will need to be based on closed-loop systems, renewable energy, and sustainable materials.
Transportation Networks: Sustainable transportation systems, including land, air, and sea travel, will be essential for moving people and goods efficiently and with minimal environmental impact.
Homes and Workplaces: Sustainable technologies will be integrated into buildings to optimize energy use, manage resources, and create healthy living and working environments.
Space: As humanity expands beyond Earth, sustainable technologies will be needed for space exploration, resource utilization, and the establishment of off-world settlements.

In essence, sustainable technology in 3010 will be crucial for:

Providing basic necessities: Food, water, shelter, and energy for all.
Supporting economic activity: Sustainable industries, agriculture, and infrastructure.
Maintaining environmental health: Protecting ecosystems, preserving biodiversity, and mitigating climate change.
Ensuring social well-being: Promoting healthy communities, equitable access to resources, and a high quality of life.

Ultimately, sustainable technology in 3010 will be essential for creating a thriving and resilient civilization that can live in harmony with the planet and beyond.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3010 ?

It’s not a matter of how sustainable technology will be required in 3010, but rather how it will be integrated and utilized. By that point, it won’t be a separate entity but rather woven into the fabric of everyday life. Here’s how:

Seamless Integration: Sustainable technologies will be so advanced and ubiquitous that they’ll be invisible to us. Think of it like electricity today – we don’t think about how it’s generated and distributed, we just use it.
Autonomous Systems: Many sustainable systems will likely be autonomous, requiring minimal human intervention. For example, energy grids could be self-regulating, and resource management systems could be AI-driven.
Personalized Solutions: Sustainable technologies will likely be personalized to meet individual needs. Imagine clothing that generates energy from your movements or homes that adapt to your preferences and optimize resource use.
Circular Economy: Everything will be designed with a circular economy in mind, where resources are continuously reused and recycled. Waste will be a thing of the past, and products will be designed for disassembly and repurposing.
Biomimicry: Technologies will increasingly draw inspiration from nature, mimicking biological processes for energy production, materials science, and other applications.
Decentralization: Sustainable systems may be more decentralized, empowering individuals and communities to manage their own resources and reduce their reliance on centralized infrastructure.

In essence, sustainable technology in 3010 will be characterized by:

Efficiency: Technologies will be highly efficient, minimizing resource input and maximizing output.
Resilience: Systems will be designed to withstand environmental changes and disruptions.
Intelligence: Technologies will be intelligent, adapting to changing conditions and optimizing resource use.
Harmony with nature: Technologies will be integrated with natural ecosystems, minimizing their impact and even enhancing them.

Ultimately, sustainable technology in 3010 will be an integral part of a highly advanced and interconnected world, enabling humanity to thrive in a way that is both environmentally responsible and socially equitable.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3010 ?

It’s tricky to give a specific “case study” of sustainable technology in 3010, as that would involve predicting the future with certainty! However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on current trends and potential future developments.

Case Study: The City of Aurora, 3010

Background: By 3010, many coastal cities have been significantly impacted by rising sea levels. Aurora, a city built on higher ground, has become a major hub for sustainable living and technological innovation.

Sustainable Technologies in Action:

Energy: Aurora is powered entirely by a combination of advanced renewable energy sources. Space-based solar power provides a constant stream of clean energy, supplemented by highly efficient wind and geothermal power plants. Energy storage systems, integrated with the city’s smart grid, ensure a stable and reliable power supply.
Resource Management: Aurora operates on a closed-loop system for resource utilization. All waste is recycled and reused, and materials are designed for disassembly and repurposing. Advanced water purification and recycling systems ensure a constant supply of clean water.
Food Production: Vertical farms and hydroponic gardens within the city provide fresh, locally grown food. Advanced agricultural technologies, including precision farming and AI-powered crop management, optimize food production while minimizing resource use.
Transportation: Aurora’s transportation system is based on electric vehicles, powered by the city’s renewable energy grid. Autonomous vehicles and smart traffic management systems optimize traffic flow and reduce congestion. High-speed rail and maglev trains connect Aurora to other cities, minimizing the need for air travel.
Built Environment: Buildings in Aurora are designed to be energy-efficient and environmentally friendly. They incorporate sustainable materials, passive heating and cooling systems, and green roofs and walls. Smart building management systems optimize energy use and create comfortable living and working environments.
AI Integration: Artificial intelligence plays a crucial role in managing Aurora’s sustainable systems. AI-powered systems optimize energy use, manage resources, predict and prevent environmental problems, and personalize services for residents.

Outcomes:

Environmental Sustainability: Aurora has a minimal environmental footprint, with low carbon emissions, minimal waste, and a thriving ecosystem.
Economic Prosperity: Aurora’s sustainable economy creates jobs and ensures a high quality of life for its residents.
Social Equity: Aurora provides equitable access to resources and opportunities for all its citizens.
Resilience: Aurora is resilient to environmental changes and disruptions, ensuring the long-term well-being of its community.

Lessons Learned:

Long-term Vision: Aurora’s success is based on a long-term vision for sustainability and a commitment to technological innovation.
Systems Thinking: Aurora’s sustainable systems are interconnected and integrated, maximizing efficiency and minimizing waste.
Community Engagement: Aurora’s residents are actively involved in the city’s sustainability initiatives, fostering a sense of ownership and responsibility.

This hypothetical case study illustrates how sustainable technologies could be integrated into a city in 3010, creating a thriving and resilient community. While this is just one possible scenario, it highlights the potential of sustainable technology to address the challenges of the future and create a better world for all.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Carnegie India

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3010 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 3010 – A Vision for the Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 3010. While precise predictions are impossible, we can extrapolate from current trends and envision how technological advancements, coupled with societal shifts, might shape a future where sustainability is not just a goal, but a fundamental reality. This paper examines potential key areas of focus, challenges, and the overall impact on human civilization.

1. Introduction:

The imperative for sustainable practices is already upon us. By 3010, it will likely be the cornerstone of human civilization. This paper postulates that sustainable technology will have evolved from discrete solutions to a seamlessly integrated network of systems, deeply interwoven with every aspect of life. We will no longer be “adopting” sustainable technology; it will be the technology.

2. Key Areas of Focus:

2.1. Energy: Fusion power, or a similarly high-density, clean energy source, will likely be the primary energy provider. Space-based solar farms may supplement this, beaming energy to Earth. Advanced energy storage solutions will ensure consistent power availability, even during fluctuations in supply. Microgrids and localized energy generation will empower communities.
2.2. Resource Management: A true circular economy will be in place. Resource extraction will be minimized, with a focus on closed-loop systems. Advanced recycling and upcycling technologies will transform waste into valuable resources. Materials science will produce biodegradable and self-healing materials, further reducing waste.
2.3. Food Production: Vertical farms, hydroponics, and aeroponics will be commonplace, maximizing food production in urban and even space-based environments. Precision agriculture, utilizing AI and robotics, will optimize crop yields while minimizing resource input. Cultivated meat and other alternative protein sources will reduce reliance on traditional animal agriculture.
2.4. Water Management: Advanced filtration and purification systems will ensure access to clean water, even in arid regions. Atmospheric water generation may become a viable option. Smart irrigation systems will minimize water waste in agriculture.
2.5. Transportation: Personal transportation will likely be dominated by autonomous electric vehicles, seamlessly integrated with smart city infrastructure. High-speed rail and maglev technology will facilitate efficient long-distance travel. Sustainable aviation fuels and electric aircraft may become increasingly prevalent.
2.6. Built Environment: Buildings will be self-sufficient, generating their own energy and managing their own resources. Smart building materials will adapt to environmental conditions, optimizing energy efficiency and occupant comfort. Green infrastructure, such as living walls and roofs, will be integrated into urban landscapes.
2.7. Information and Communication Technologies (ICT): AI and advanced computing will be integral to managing sustainable systems. Smart grids, resource management platforms, and environmental monitoring systems will rely heavily on ICT. Personalized AI assistants will help individuals make sustainable choices in their daily lives.
2.8. Space Exploration and Colonization: Sustainable technologies will be crucial for human expansion beyond Earth. In-situ resource utilization (ISRU) will enable the use of resources found on other planets and celestial bodies. Closed-loop life support systems will be essential for long-duration space missions and off-world settlements.

3. Challenges:

3.1. Technological Development: Continued investment in research and development will be crucial for realizing the full potential of sustainable technologies.
3.2. Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource depletion will require international collaboration and shared responsibility.
3.3. Ethical Considerations: The development and deployment of advanced technologies, particularly AI, will raise ethical questions that must be carefully considered.
3.4. Social Equity: Ensuring that the benefits of sustainable technologies are shared equitably by all members of society will be a major challenge.
3.5. Adaptability: Humanity will need to adapt to a rapidly changing world and embrace new ways of living and working.

4. Impact on Human Civilization:

Sustainable technology in 3010 has the potential to transform human civilization in profound ways:

Environmental Stewardship: A healthy planet with thriving ecosystems.
Resource Security: Access to clean energy, water, and other essential resources for all.
Economic Prosperity: A sustainable and circular economy that creates jobs and opportunities.
Social Equity: A more just and equitable society where everyone has access to basic necessities and opportunities.
Human Flourishing: A world where humans can thrive and reach their full potential.

5. Conclusion:

The vision of sustainable technology in 3010 is ambitious but achievable. By embracing innovation, fostering global cooperation, and prioritizing ethical considerations, we can create a future where humanity lives in harmony with the planet and enjoys a high quality of life for generations to come. The journey towards this future begins today, with the choices we make and the actions we take.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3010 ?

It’s fascinating to imagine the industrial applications of sustainable technology in 3010! Here are some possibilities, extrapolating from current trends and potential future advancements:

1. Advanced Manufacturing & Resource Management:

Closed-Loop Production Systems: Factories will operate on closed-loop systems, where all waste is recycled and reused within the production process. This will minimize resource depletion and pollution.
On-Demand Manufacturing: 3D printing and other additive manufacturing technologies will enable on-demand production, reducing waste from overproduction and allowing for highly customized products.
AI-Powered Optimization: AI will play a crucial role in optimizing manufacturing processes, minimizing energy consumption, and predicting and preventing equipment failures.
Sustainable Materials: Industries will rely on advanced materials with unique properties, such as self-healing materials, biodegradable plastics, and materials that can capture and store carbon.

2. Energy-Intensive Industries:

Clean Energy Integration: Energy-intensive industries, such as steel and aluminum production, will be powered by advanced renewable energy sources, such as fusion power or space-based solar.
Carbon Capture and Utilization: Industries will implement advanced carbon capture and utilization technologies to minimize greenhouse gas emissions and even turn carbon dioxide into valuable products.
Energy Efficiency: Industries will prioritize energy efficiency in all aspects of their operations, from equipment design to process optimization.

3. Resource Extraction and Processing:

Sustainable Mining: Mining operations will utilize advanced technologies to minimize environmental impact, such as autonomous vehicles, precision mining techniques, and in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) for extracting resources from other planets or celestial bodies.
Resource Recovery: Industries will focus on recovering valuable materials from waste streams and recycling them back into the production process.
Biomining: Biomining, using microorganisms to extract valuable minerals from ores, may become more widespread, reducing the need for traditional mining methods.

4. Agriculture and Food Production:

Vertical Farming and Controlled Environment Agriculture: Urban centers and even space-based settlements will rely on vertical farms and controlled environment agriculture to produce food locally, minimizing transportation needs and resource use.
Precision Agriculture: Advanced technologies, such as sensors, drones, and AI, will be used to optimize crop yields while minimizing water and fertilizer use.
Cultivated Meat and Alternative Proteins: Industries will produce cultivated meat and other alternative proteins to reduce reliance on traditional animal agriculture, which has a significant environmental footprint.

5. Infrastructure and Construction:

Sustainable Building Materials: The construction industry will utilize sustainable building materials, such as recycled materials, bio-based materials, and materials that can capture carbon.
Self-Healing Infrastructure: Infrastructure, such as roads and bridges, will be built with self-healing materials that can repair themselves, reducing maintenance needs and extending their lifespan.
Modular and Prefabricated Construction: Modular and prefabricated construction methods will be used to reduce waste and construction time.

Overall, industrial applications of sustainable technology in 3010 will be characterized by:

Resource efficiency: Minimizing resource input and maximizing output.
Environmental responsibility: Minimizing environmental impact and protecting ecosystems.
Technological innovation: Utilizing advanced technologies to create sustainable solutions.
Circular economy: Designing products and processes for reuse and recycling.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology could be applied in industries in 3010. The actual applications will depend on a variety of factors, including technological advancements, societal priorities, and economic conditions. However, it is clear that sustainable technology will play a crucial role in creating a more environmentally responsible and economically prosperous future.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3010 ?

It’s exciting to think about the research and development that might lead to the sustainable technologies of 3010! Here are some areas where intensive research and development efforts would likely be focused:

1. Fundamental Science and Discovery:

New Energy Sources: Research into fusion power, exotic forms of energy, and more efficient ways to harness renewable energy sources like solar and geothermal will be crucial.
Materials Science: Developing new materials with extraordinary properties, such as self-healing materials, superconductors at room temperature, and materials that can interact with biological systems, will be essential.
Artificial Intelligence: Advanced AI research will be needed to create intelligent systems that can manage complex sustainable infrastructure and optimize resource use.
Understanding Complex Systems: Research into complex systems, such as climate systems and ecosystems, will be crucial for predicting and mitigating environmental changes.

2. Technological Innovation:

Advanced Manufacturing: Developing new manufacturing techniques, such as 4D printing and molecular manufacturing, will enable the creation of highly complex and customized sustainable products.
Biotechnology: Research in biotechnology could lead to breakthroughs in areas such as biomining, bioenergy production, and the development of sustainable bioplastics.
Nanotechnology: Nanotechnology could be used to create new materials with unique properties, as well as to develop advanced sensors and devices for environmental monitoring and resource management.
Space Technologies: Research in space technologies will be crucial for developing sustainable space exploration and colonization, including in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) and closed-loop life support systems.

3. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

Systems Thinking: Research will need to take a systems approach, considering the interconnectedness of different technologies and their impact on the environment and society.
Collaboration: Collaboration between scientists, engineers, social scientists, and policymakers will be essential for developing sustainable solutions that are both technologically feasible and socially acceptable.
Open Innovation: Open innovation models, where researchers from different institutions and disciplines collaborate and share knowledge, will be crucial for accelerating the development of sustainable technologies.

4. Ethical Considerations:

Responsible Innovation: Research and development will need to be guided by ethical considerations, ensuring that new technologies are developed and used in a responsible manner.
Social Impact: The social impact of new technologies will need to be carefully considered, ensuring that they benefit all members of society and do not exacerbate existing inequalities.
Transparency: Transparency in research and development will be crucial for building public trust and ensuring that new technologies are used in a way that is aligned with societal values.

5. Education and Training:

Interdisciplinary Education: Education and training programs will need to be developed to prepare the next generation of scientists, engineers, and policymakers to address the challenges of sustainability.
Lifelong Learning: Lifelong learning will be essential for keeping up with the rapid pace of technological change and ensuring that people have the skills and knowledge needed to participate in a sustainable economy.

By focusing on these areas of research and development, we can lay the foundation for the sustainable technologies of 3010 and create a future where humanity can thrive in harmony with the planet.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Sustain Life (now part of Workiva)

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.