Sustainable Technology of 2830

79 / 100

Sustainable Technology of 2830 ?

While it’s impossible to predict the future with certainty, we can make some educated guesses about sustainable technology in 2830 based on current trends and advancements:

Possible Sustainable Technologies in 2830:

Advanced Energy Systems: Fusion power or other revolutionary energy sources could be commonplace, providing clean and abundant energy. Energy harvesting technologies might be highly advanced, with devices and infrastructure generating power from their surroundings.
Closed-Loop Resource Systems: Circular economy principles could be fully realized, with near-total recycling and reuse of materials. Manufacturing processes might be entirely waste-free, and products designed for disassembly and repurposing.
Highly Efficient Transportation: Transportation systems could be dominated by electric or other clean energy vehicles, with advanced autonomous driving and optimized infrastructure to minimize energy consumption and congestion.
Precision Agriculture and Food Production: Agriculture could be highly advanced, with vertical farms, hydroponics, and other technologies maximizing food production while minimizing land use and environmental impact.
Advanced Water Management: Desalination and water purification technologies could be highly efficient and affordable, ensuring access to clean water for all. Water conservation and reuse might be standard practice in all sectors.
Biotechnology and Biomimicry: Biotechnology could be used to create sustainable materials, fuels, and other products. Biomimicry, where technology is inspired by nature, might lead to highly efficient and resilient systems.
Smart Cities and Infrastructure: Cities could be highly integrated and optimized, with smart grids, sensors, and data analytics used to manage resources efficiently and minimize environmental impact.
Carbon Capture and Storage: Advanced technologies could capture and store or utilize carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, helping to mitigate climate change.
Sustainable Computing: Computing technologies might be highly energy-efficient and use renewable resources, with new computing paradigms like quantum computing potentially offering breakthroughs in sustainability.

Challenges and Considerations:

Resource Availability: Even with advanced technology, ensuring access to resources like rare earth minerals and other materials will be crucial.
Technological Equity: Ensuring that sustainable technologies are accessible and affordable for everyone will be essential to avoid exacerbating inequalities.
Environmental Impacts: Even sustainable technologies can have unintended environmental consequences, so careful assessment and management will be necessary.
Social and Ethical Considerations: The development and deployment of new technologies will raise social and ethical questions that need to be addressed.

Overall:

Sustainable technology in 2830 is likely

You stopped this response

What is Sustainable Technology of 2830 ?

It’s fascinating to think about sustainable technology in 2830! While we can’t predict the future with absolute certainty, we can make some informed guesses based on current trends and advancements. Here’s a glimpse into what sustainable tech might look like centuries from now:

1. Energy Revolution:

Fusion Power: Imagine a world where clean, abundant energy is readily available thanks to breakthroughs in fusion power. This could revolutionize everything from transportation to manufacturing.
Energy Harvesting: Devices and infrastructure might be designed to capture energy from their surroundings – solar, wind, even vibrations – making energy generation ubiquitous and decentralized.

2. Resource Efficiency:

Closed-Loop Systems: The concept of a circular economy could be fully realized. Products would be designed for disassembly and reuse, with near-total recycling and minimal waste.
Advanced Materials: Sustainable materials derived from renewable resources or through innovative processes could replace traditional ones, reducing our reliance on finite resources.

3. Food and Agriculture:

Vertical Farms and Hydroponics: High-tech, indoor farming could become the norm, maximizing food production while minimizing land use and environmental impact.
Precision Agriculture: Advanced sensors and data analytics could optimize crop yields, reduce water and fertilizer use, and minimize environmental impact.

4. Water Management:

Desalination and Purification: Highly efficient and affordable technologies could ensure access to clean water for everyone, even in water-scarce regions.
Water Conservation: Smart systems and technologies could minimize water waste in homes, industries, and agriculture.

5. Transportation:

Electric and Clean Energy Vehicles: Transportation systems could be dominated by vehicles powered by electricity or other clean energy sources, with autonomous driving and optimized infrastructure for efficiency.
Advanced Public Transport: High-speed, sustainable public transport systems could connect cities and regions, reducing reliance on individual vehicles.

6. Biotechnology and Biomimicry:

Sustainable Materials: Biotechnology could be used to create sustainable materials, fuels, and other products from renewable resources.
Biomimetic Technologies: Inspired by nature, technologies could be developed for their efficiency, resilience, and ability to integrate seamlessly with the environment.

7. Smart Cities and Infrastructure:

Optimized Resource Management: Cities could be highly integrated and optimized, with smart grids, sensors, and data analytics used to manage resources efficiently and minimize environmental impact.
Sustainable Buildings: Buildings could be designed to generate their own energy, recycle water, and minimize their carbon footprint.

8. Carbon Capture and Storage:

Atmospheric Carbon Removal: Advanced technologies could capture and store or utilize carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, helping to mitigate climate change.
Carbon-Neutral Industries: Manufacturing and other industries could adopt processes that minimize or eliminate carbon emissions.

9. Computing and Technology:

Sustainable Computing: Computing technologies might be highly energy-efficient and use renewable resources, with new computing paradigms like quantum computing potentially offering breakthroughs in sustainability.
AI for Sustainability: Artificial intelligence could play a crucial role in optimizing resource use, predicting environmental changes, and developing sustainable solutions.

Challenges and Considerations:

Resource Availability: Even with advanced technology, ensuring access to resources like rare earth minerals and other materials will be crucial.
Technological Equity: Ensuring that sustainable technologies are accessible and affordable for everyone will be essential to avoid exacerbating inequalities.
Environmental Impacts: Even sustainable technologies can have unintended environmental consequences, so careful assessment and management will be necessary.
Social and Ethical Considerations: The development and deployment of new technologies will raise social and ethical questions that need to be addressed.

In Conclusion:

Sustainable technology in 2830 is likely to be highly advanced and integrated into all aspects of life. It will play a crucial role in addressing climate change, resource scarcity, and other environmental challenges, while also improving quality of life and promoting social equity. However, careful planning and consideration of potential challenges will be essential to ensure that these technologies truly contribute to a sustainable future.Sources and related content

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 2830 ?

It’s not a question of who requires sustainable technology in 2830, but rather who will benefit from it, and that’s essentially everyone. Here’s why:

Humanity as a whole: Sustainable technology is crucial for addressing global challenges like climate change, resource scarcity, and pollution. It will be essential for ensuring a healthy planet and a good quality of life for future generations.
Governments and policymakers: They will need to invest in and promote sustainable technologies to meet their environmental goals and ensure the well-being of their citizens.
Businesses: Companies that adopt sustainable practices and technologies will be more competitive, attract environmentally conscious consumers, and contribute to a more sustainable economy.
Individuals: We will all benefit from cleaner air and water, access to sustainable energy and resources, and a healthier environment.
Developing countries: Sustainable technology can help them leapfrog to cleaner and more efficient systems, avoiding the environmental problems associated with traditional industrialization.

In essence, sustainable technology in 2830 will be a necessity for survival and prosperity for all of humanity. It will be an integral part of our lives, shaping the way we live, work, and interact with the planet.

It’s important to remember that the development and adoption of sustainable technology is not just the responsibility of a few. It requires a collective effort from governments, businesses, individuals, and researchers around the world. By working together, we can create a sustainable future for ourselves and for generations to come.Sources and related content

When is required Sustainable Technology of 2830 ?

The need for sustainable technology isn’t something relegated to the year 2830. It’s required now, and the urgency only increases with each passing year. While the specific forms of sustainable technology might be highly advanced in 2830, the fundamental need is immediate.

Here’s a breakdown of why the timeline is crucial:

Now (Present): We are already facing the consequences of unsustainable practices: climate change, pollution, resource depletion. We need to implement existing sustainable technologies and develop new ones urgently to mitigate these effects. The longer we wait, the more severe the consequences will become.
The coming decades (near future): The transition to a sustainable future requires significant investment in research, development, and infrastructure. We need to be making those investments now to ensure that sustainable solutions are available and scalable in the near future. This is also the window where we can still prevent the worst impacts of climate change.
2830 (far future): By 2830, we will ideally have fully transitioned to a sustainable world, powered by advanced technologies that we can only imagine today. However, the groundwork for that future must be laid now. The technologies of 2830 will be built upon the innovations and choices we make in the present and near future.

So, while the specific technologies of 2830 are interesting to speculate about, the need for sustainable technology is not a future problem. It’s a present necessity. We need to be working towards that future today.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Accenture

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 2830 ?

That’s a great question! It’s not just about when we need sustainable technology, but also where it’s needed. The answer is: everywhere!

Here’s a breakdown of the key areas where sustainable technology will be essential:

Our Homes and Cities: Sustainable building materials, energy-efficient appliances, smart grids, and waste management systems will make our living spaces more environmentally friendly.
Transportation: Electric vehicles, advanced public transportation, and sustainable aviation will reduce emissions and pollution.
Agriculture and Food Production: Sustainable farming practices, vertical farms, and efficient irrigation systems will ensure food security while minimizing environmental impact.
Industry and Manufacturing: Sustainable manufacturing processes, closed-loop systems, and the use of renewable energy will reduce waste and pollution.
Energy Production: Renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and fusion power will provide clean and sustainable energy for all.
Water Management: Efficient water purification and desalination technologies, along with water conservation systems, will ensure access to clean water.
Natural Ecosystems: Sustainable forestry practices, conservation technologies, and efforts to protect biodiversity will help preserve our planet’s natural resources.

Essentially, sustainable technology needs to be integrated into every aspect of our lives and in every corner of the world. This includes:

Developed countries: They have a responsibility to lead the way in developing and implementing sustainable technologies, and to help developing countries adopt them as well.
Developing countries: Sustainable technology can help them grow their economies in an environmentally responsible way, and avoid the mistakes of the past.
Remote and rural areas: Sustainable solutions can provide access to clean energy, water, and other essential resources in areas that are off the grid.

Ultimately, the goal is to create a world where human activities are in balance with the planet’s resources and ecosystems. This requires a global effort, with everyone working together to develop and implement sustainable solutions in all areas of life.Sources and related content

How is required Sustainable Technology of 2830 ?

You’re asking a fundamental question about how we can achieve a future where sustainable technology is the norm! It’s a complex challenge, but here’s a breakdown of the key approaches needed:

1. Research and Development:

Fundamental Science: Investing in basic research to discover new materials, energy sources, and processes that can form the foundation for future sustainable technologies.
Applied Research: Focusing on developing and refining specific sustainable technologies, such as more efficient solar cells, advanced batteries, and carbon capture systems.
Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Encouraging collaboration between scientists, engineers, designers, and social scientists to create holistic and effective solutions.

2. Policy and Regulation:

Incentives: Governments can provide financial incentives, such as subsidies and tax breaks, to encourage the development and adoption of sustainable technologies.
Regulations: Setting standards and regulations to phase out unsustainable practices and promote the use of sustainable alternatives.
International Cooperation: Working together across borders to address global challenges like climate change and resource depletion.

3. Business and Industry:

Sustainable Practices: Companies can adopt sustainable practices throughout their operations, from sourcing materials to manufacturing and distribution.
Innovation: Investing in research and development to create new sustainable products and services.
Circular Economy: Embracing circular economy principles, where resources are reused and recycled to minimize waste.

4. Education and Awareness:

Public Education: Raising awareness about the importance of sustainability and the benefits of sustainable technologies.
Skills Development: Training the next generation of scientists, engineers, and entrepreneurs in sustainable technologies.
Citizen Engagement: Empowering individuals to make sustainable choices in their daily lives.

5. Investment and Finance:

Green Finance: Directing investments towards sustainable projects and technologies.
ESG Integration: Incorporating environmental, social, and governance factors into investment decisions.
Risk Assessment: Evaluating the long-term risks of unsustainable practices and the potential benefits of sustainable solutions.

6. Collaboration and Partnerships:

Public-Private Partnerships: Encouraging collaboration between governments, businesses, and research institutions.
International Collaboration: Sharing knowledge and technologies across borders.
Community Engagement: Involving local communities in the development and implementation of sustainable solutions.

It’s a long-term process:

Achieving a future where sustainable technology is the norm will take time, effort, and commitment from all stakeholders. It requires a fundamental shift in our thinking and our way of life. But by working together, we can create a more sustainable future for ourselves and for generations to come.Sources and related content

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 2830 ?

It’s impossible to provide a real case study of sustainable technology in 2830. Case studies analyze existing projects and their outcomes. Since 2830 is far in the future, we can only create hypothetical case studies based on current trends and educated guesses. These hypothetical case studies are more about exploring possibilities and challenges than analyzing real-world data.

Here’s an example of a hypothetical case study of sustainable technology in 2830:

Hypothetical Case Study: The Atacama Desert Atmospheric Water Farm (2830)

Introduction:

By 2830, access to clean water remains a critical challenge in many parts of the world. This case study examines the Atacama Desert Atmospheric Water Farm, a large-scale facility that utilizes advanced atmospheric water generation (AWG) technology to provide potable water to communities in the region.

Background:

The Atacama Desert, one of the driest places on Earth, has historically relied on limited groundwater resources and long-distance water transport. Climate change has exacerbated water scarcity, making traditional methods unsustainable. The Atmospheric Water Farm was established in 2815 as a pilot project and expanded to its current scale by 2830.

Technology:

The Atacama facility employs a combination of advanced technologies:

Enhanced Condensation: The farm utilizes a network of large, porous structures that maximize surface area for condensation. These structures are made from a novel biomaterial that attracts and retains water molecules from the air, even at low humidity levels.
Renewable Energy Integration: The entire facility is powered by a combination of solar and geothermal energy, ensuring a minimal carbon footprint. Excess energy generated is stored in advanced battery systems for use during periods of low solar or geothermal output.
AI-Powered Optimization: An AI system constantly monitors weather patterns, humidity levels, and energy availability to optimize the condensation process and ensure efficient water production.
Water Purification and Distribution: The collected water undergoes a multi-stage purification process using advanced filtration and sterilization techniques. The purified water is then distributed to local communities through a network of pipelines.

Results and Impacts:

Water Security: The Atacama Water Farm provides a reliable source of clean water for hundreds of thousands of people, significantly improving water security in the region.
Environmental Benefits: The facility has a minimal environmental impact, relying on renewable energy and reducing the need for water transport, which in turn lowers emissions.
Economic Development: The availability of reliable water resources has supported local agriculture and economic development.
Social Impacts: Improved access to water has had positive social impacts, freeing up time previously spent on water collection and improving public health.

Challenges:

Material Durability: Maintaining the large condensation structures in the harsh desert environment has presented challenges. Ongoing research focuses on developing more durable and resilient biomaterials.
Energy Efficiency: While the facility relies on renewable energy, further improvements in energy efficiency are constantly being sought to minimize operating costs.
Scalability: Adapting the technology to other regions with different climates and environmental conditions requires ongoing research and development.

Conclusion:

The Atacama Desert Atmospheric Water Farm demonstrates the potential of advanced sustainable technologies to address critical resource challenges. While challenges remain, the facility represents a significant step towards a more water-secure future and provides a model for other regions facing similar challenges.

Important Note: This is a fictional case study. The specific technologies and outcomes are speculative. The purpose is to illustrate how we might analyze sustainable technology in the future, not to predict the future itself.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 2830 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 2830: Envisioning a Harmonious Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores potential advancements in sustainable technology by the year 2830. It acknowledges the speculative nature of long-term predictions but aims to stimulate thought and guide present-day research and development by envisioning a future where technology plays a crucial role in environmental stewardship and societal well-being. The paper examines potential breakthroughs in energy, resource management, food production, transportation, and information technology, while also considering the ethical and social implications of such advancements.

1. Introduction:

The 29th century will likely witness a world profoundly transformed by technological progress. This transformation, however, must be grounded in sustainability. This paper posits that by 2830, humanity will have achieved a state of near-equilibrium with the planet’s resources, driven by revolutionary sustainable technologies. This vision is not utopian; it recognizes the inherent challenges but emphasizes the potential for human ingenuity to overcome them.

2. Energy Revolution:

Fusion Power Dominance: Controlled nuclear fusion, after centuries of research, will be a primary energy source, providing clean, abundant power. Advanced reactor designs and materials science will ensure safety and efficiency.
Ubiquitous Energy Harvesting: Nanotechnology and advanced materials will enable energy harvesting from ambient sources – solar, wind, geothermal, kinetic – integrated into infrastructure and everyday devices. Energy grids will be highly decentralized and resilient.
Space-Based Solar Power: Large-scale solar arrays in orbit will collect solar energy and beam it to Earth, supplementing terrestrial sources and providing consistent power.

3. Resource Management:

Circular Economy Mastery: Closed-loop systems will be the norm. Materials will be designed for disassembly and reuse, with near-total recycling and minimal waste. Advanced material science will create substitutes for scarce resources.
Resource Mining from Non-Terrestrial Sources: Asteroid mining and other space-based resource acquisition will supplement Earth’s resources, reducing pressure on terrestrial ecosystems.
Pollution Remediation: Advanced nanotechnology and bioremediation will be used to clean up existing pollution and restore damaged ecosystems.

4. Food Production:

Precision Agriculture and Vertical Farms: AI-powered precision agriculture will optimize crop yields while minimizing resource use. Vertical farms in urban centers will provide fresh, locally grown produce, reducing transportation needs.
Cultivated Meat and Alternative Proteins: Advanced biotechnology will produce meat and other protein sources without the environmental impact of traditional animal agriculture.
Personalized Nutrition: Nanotechnology and personalized medicine will allow for customized dietary plans based on individual needs and genetic predispositions.

5. Transportation:

Sustainable Transportation Networks: Electric and hydrogen-powered vehicles will dominate transportation, with advanced autonomous driving systems optimizing traffic flow and reducing accidents.
Hyperloop and Maglev Trains: High-speed transportation systems like hyperloops and maglev trains will connect cities and regions, reducing travel times and emissions.
Sustainable Aviation: Biofuels and electric propulsion will power aircraft, minimizing the environmental impact of air travel.

6. Information Technology:

Quantum Computing for Sustainability: Quantum computers will enable the modeling of complex environmental systems, leading to better predictions and more effective solutions.
AI-Driven Resource Management: Artificial intelligence will optimize resource allocation, predict environmental changes, and manage complex infrastructure systems.
Decentralized Data Networks: Blockchain and other decentralized technologies will ensure data security and transparency, promoting trust and collaboration.

7. Ethical and Social Considerations:

Technological Equity: Ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies will be crucial to avoid exacerbating social and economic inequalities.
Environmental Justice: Addressing the disproportionate impact of environmental problems on marginalized communities will be a priority.
Bioethics and Nanotechnology: Careful consideration of the ethical implications of biotechnology and nanotechnology will be essential.

8. Conclusion:

The sustainable technologies of 2830 offer a vision of a future where humanity lives in harmony with the planet. While the specific technologies described are speculative, they represent the direction in which research and development must move. By investing in sustainable innovation today, we can pave the way for a brighter and more sustainable future for all. This requires a global commitment to collaboration, ethical considerations, and a long-term perspective. The challenges are significant, but the potential rewards are even greater.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 2830 ?

It’s exciting to imagine the industrial applications of sustainable technology in 2830! While we can only speculate, here are some potential scenarios based on current trends and projections:

1. Manufacturing & Production:

Closed-Loop Production Systems: Factories will operate on circular economy principles. Raw materials will be sourced sustainably, products will be designed for disassembly and reuse, and waste will be virtually eliminated. Advanced recycling technologies will allow for the near-total recovery of materials.
Additive Manufacturing at Scale: 3D printing and other additive manufacturing techniques will be highly advanced, enabling on-demand production of complex products with minimal waste. Personalized manufacturing will be commonplace.
Bio-Integrated Manufacturing: Biotechnology will be integrated into manufacturing processes, allowing for the production of materials and products from renewable resources. Biomanufacturing could be used to create everything from biodegradable plastics to self-healing materials.
AI-Optimized Production: AI systems will manage and optimize entire production processes, from design and material selection to manufacturing and distribution. This will lead to increased efficiency, reduced energy consumption, and minimized waste.

2. Energy & Resource Management:

Decentralized Energy Grids: Industries will generate much of their own energy through on-site renewable energy installations and energy harvesting technologies. Smart grids will connect these decentralized energy sources, creating a resilient and efficient energy system.
Carbon Capture and Utilization: Advanced carbon capture technologies will be integrated into industrial processes, capturing CO2 emissions and converting them into valuable products like fuels and chemicals.
Resource Recovery and Recycling: Highly efficient recycling and resource recovery systems will be integrated into industrial operations, minimizing the need for virgin materials.

3. Infrastructure & Construction:

Self-Healing Infrastructure: Buildings and infrastructure will be constructed from self-healing materials that can repair damage automatically, reducing maintenance costs and extending lifespan.
Smart Buildings and Cities: Buildings will be equipped with sensors and AI systems that optimize energy consumption, water usage, and other resources. Smart city infrastructure will integrate these smart buildings into a larger network, creating highly efficient and sustainable urban environments.
Sustainable Construction Materials: Construction will rely heavily on sustainable materials, such as bio-based composites and recycled materials, minimizing the environmental impact of building construction.

4. Transportation & Logistics:

Autonomous Logistics Networks: Autonomous vehicles and drones will be used for transportation and logistics, optimizing delivery routes and reducing fuel consumption.
Sustainable Transportation Fuels: Industries will rely on sustainable transportation fuels, such as biofuels and hydrogen, minimizing their carbon footprint.

5. Agriculture & Food Production:

Vertical Farms and Controlled Environment Agriculture: Industries will utilize vertical farms and other forms of controlled environment agriculture to produce food locally and sustainably, reducing transportation needs and minimizing environmental impact.
Precision Agriculture Technologies: Advanced sensors and AI systems will be used to optimize crop yields, reduce water and fertilizer use, and minimize environmental impact.

6. Mining & Resource Extraction:

Sustainable Mining Practices: Mining operations will adopt sustainable practices, such as minimizing waste, reducing water usage, and restoring mined areas.
Space-Based Resource Extraction: In the long term, space-based resource extraction may become a viable option, reducing the environmental impact of terrestrial mining.

7. Biotechnology & Advanced Materials:

Biomanufacturing: Biotechnology will be used to produce a wide range of industrial materials, from plastics to textiles, from renewable resources.
Nanotechnology: Nanotechnology will be used to create advanced materials with unique properties, such as high strength, light weight, and self-healing capabilities.

These are just a few examples of the potential industrial applications of sustainable technology in 2830. The actual applications will depend on the specific technological advancements that are made in the coming centuries. However, it is clear that sustainable technology will play a crucial role in creating a more environmentally responsible and resource-efficient industrial sector.Sources and related content

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 2830 ?

It’s fascinating to consider the research and development (R&D) needed to achieve sustainable technology by 2830! While we can’t know for sure what that R&D will entail, here are some key areas and directions based on current trends and future projections:

1. Advanced Energy Technologies:

Fusion Energy: Continued research into plasma physics, materials science, and reactor design to make fusion power a practical and commercially viable energy source.
Exotic Energy Sources: Exploration of more unconventional energy sources like zero-point energy or other theoretical physics concepts.
Advanced Energy Storage: Development of highly efficient and long-lasting energy storage solutions, such as advanced batteries, supercapacitors, and other novel storage methods.
Energy Harvesting: Research into nanomaterials and devices that can efficiently capture energy from ambient sources like solar, wind, vibrations, and even body heat.

2. Resource Revolution:

Materials Science: Developing new materials with desired properties (strength, lightness, durability) from abundant and sustainable resources. This includes biomaterials, advanced composites, and nanomaterials.
Circular Economy Technologies: Creating technologies for efficient recycling, resource recovery, and remanufacturing. This includes advanced separation techniques, chemical recycling, and AI-driven waste management systems.
Resource Extraction from Non-Terrestrial Sources: Researching and developing technologies for asteroid mining and other space-based resource acquisition.

3. Sustainable Food Systems:

Precision Agriculture: Developing advanced sensors, AI systems, and robotics for optimizing crop yields, reducing water and fertilizer use, and minimizing environmental impact.
Vertical Farming and Controlled Environment Agriculture: Researching and improving technologies for indoor farming systems that maximize food production while minimizing land use and environmental impact.
Alternative Proteins: Developing and refining technologies for producing meat and other protein sources from non-animal sources, such as cultivated meat and plant-based proteins.

4. Environmental Remediation:

Carbon Capture and Utilization: Researching and developing more efficient and cost-effective technologies for capturing CO2 from the atmosphere and converting it into useful products.
Pollution Remediation: Developing advanced technologies for cleaning up existing pollution in air, water, and soil, including bioremediation and nanotechnology-based solutions.
Ecosystem Restoration: Researching and developing methods for restoring damaged ecosystems and preserving biodiversity.

5. Sustainable Transportation:

Advanced Batteries and Fuel Cells: Developing more efficient and sustainable batteries and fuel cells for electric and hydrogen-powered vehicles.
Sustainable Aviation Fuels: Researching and developing biofuels and other sustainable fuels for aircraft.
Autonomous Driving and Traffic Management: Developing AI-powered systems for autonomous vehicles and traffic management to optimize traffic flow and reduce fuel consumption.

6. Information Technology for Sustainability:

Quantum Computing: Exploring the potential of quantum computing to model complex environmental systems and optimize resource management.
AI for Sustainability: Developing AI systems for a wide range of sustainability applications, from predicting environmental changes to optimizing energy grids.
Sustainable Computing: Researching and developing more energy-efficient computing technologies, including new computing paradigms and sustainable hardware.

7. Social and Ethical Considerations:

Technology Assessment: Developing frameworks for assessing the social and environmental impacts of new technologies.
Ethical AI: Researching and developing AI systems that are fair, transparent, and aligned with human values.
Technological Equity: Exploring ways to ensure that sustainable technologies are accessible and affordable for everyone.

Cross-Cutting Themes:

Nanotechnology: Nanotechnology will likely play a crucial role in many areas of sustainable technology, from energy harvesting to materials science.
Biotechnology: Biotechnology will be essential for developing sustainable materials, fuels, and food systems.
Artificial Intelligence: AI will be a key enabler of many sustainable technologies, from optimizing energy grids to managing resources.

Collaboration and Investment:

Achieving these goals will require a global effort, with collaboration between researchers, governments, businesses, and individuals. Significant investment in research and development will be essential to accelerate progress and bring these sustainable technologies to fruition.

It’s important to remember that this is just a glimpse into the potential research and development needed for sustainable technology in 2830. The actual path will likely be filled with unexpected discoveries and challenges. However, by focusing on these key areas and fostering a culture of innovation, we can pave the way for a more sustainable future.Sources and related content

COURTESY : Carnegie India

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.