Sustainable technology of 4950

79 / 100

Sustainable technology of 4950 ?

It seems like you’re asking about sustainable technology in the year 4950. That’s quite a long time into the future!

While it’s impossible to predict exactly what technology will look like that far ahead, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and potential future developments. Here are some possibilities for sustainable technology in 4950:

Closed-loop resource systems: By 4950, we might have perfected systems that minimize waste and maximize resource reuse. This could involve advanced recycling technologies, biodegradable materials, and manufacturing processes that produce minimal byproducts.
Advanced energy generation and storage: It’s likely that fossil fuels will be long gone by 4950. Sustainable energy sources like solar, wind, and geothermal will probably be highly advanced and integrated into our lives. We might also see new forms of energy generation, such as fusion power or even more exotic technologies. Energy storage will likely be highly efficient and ubiquitous, allowing us to store and distribute renewable energy effectively.
Precision agriculture and food production: With a growing global population, sustainable food production will be crucial. We might see highly automated and efficient agricultural systems that use minimal resources and produce high yields. Vertical farms, hydroponics, and other innovative techniques could be commonplace.
Smart infrastructure and cities: Cities of the future might be highly interconnected and optimized for sustainability. Smart grids, efficient transportation systems, and buildings that generate their own energy could be the norm.
Biotechnology and biomimicry: By 4950, we might have a deep understanding of biological systems and be able to use them to create sustainable technologies. This could involve developing new materials inspired by nature, creating biodegradable plastics, or even engineering microorganisms to clean up pollution.

Of course, these are just a few possibilities. The actual sustainable technologies of 4950 could be very different. What’s certain is that sustainability will be a critical concern for humanity in the future, and technology will play a key role in helping us achieve it.

What is Sustainable technology of 4950 ?

Predicting the exact nature of sustainable technology in 4950 is, of course, impossible. However, we can speculate based on current trends and potential future developments. Here are some possibilities:

Closed-loop resource systems: By 4950, we might have perfected systems that minimize waste and maximize resource reuse. This could involve advanced recycling technologies, biodegradable materials, and manufacturing processes that produce minimal byproducts.
Advanced energy generation and storage: It’s likely that fossil fuels will be long gone by 4950. Sustainable energy sources like solar, wind, and geothermal will probably be highly advanced and integrated into our lives. We might also see new forms of energy generation, such as fusion power or even more exotic technologies. Energy storage will likely be highly efficient and ubiquitous, allowing us to store and distribute renewable energy effectively.
Precision agriculture and food production: With a growing global population, sustainable food production will be crucial. We might see highly automated and efficient agricultural systems that use minimal resources and produce high yields. Vertical farms, hydroponics, and other innovative techniques could be commonplace.
Smart infrastructure and cities: Cities of the future might be highly interconnected and optimized for sustainability. Smart grids, efficient transportation systems, and buildings that generate their own energy could be the norm.
Biotechnology and biomimicry: By 4950, we might have a deep understanding of biological systems and be able to use them to create sustainable technologies. This could involve developing new materials inspired by nature, creating biodegradable plastics, or even engineering microorganisms to clean up pollution.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4950 ?

It’s more accurate to ask “Who will require sustainable technology in 4950?” rather than “Who is required…” as the latter implies a present-day mandate.

In 4950, virtually all of humanity will likely depend on sustainable technology. Here’s why:

Resource Scarcity: Even with advanced resource management, finite resources will necessitate technologies that minimize waste and maximize efficiency.
Environmental Concerns: The long-term effects of climate change and environmental degradation will likely make sustainable technologies essential for survival and well-being.
Economic Viability: Sustainable practices will likely be the most economically sound approach in the long run, as they reduce reliance on scarce resources and minimize environmental damage.

Therefore, sustainable technology in 4950 won’t be a matter of choice but a necessity for individuals, communities, industries, and governments alike. It will be deeply integrated into every aspect of life, from energy production and food systems to transportation and manufacturing.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4950 ?

This is a really interesting question! It gets at the heart of why we talk about sustainability in the first place.

While the full realization of sustainable technology might be something we see in 4950, the need for it is now.

Here’s why:

Long-term consequences: Many of the environmental problems we face today, like climate change, are the result of unsustainable practices over decades and centuries. The effects of these problems will continue to worsen if we don’t act now.
Building the foundation: Developing truly sustainable technologies takes time, research, and innovation. The groundwork for the technologies of 4950 needs to start today. We need to be investing in research, developing new materials, and creating systems that can eventually lead to those advanced solutions.
Urgency: The sooner we adopt more sustainable practices and technologies, the better the chances are for future generations to have a healthy planet.

So, while the world of 4950 will undoubtedly rely on those advanced sustainable technologies, the need to develop them, and to start using more sustainable solutions, is absolutely critical in the present.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4950 ?

Sustainable technology in 4950 (and, importantly, now) will be required everywhere. It won’t be confined to specific locations but rather integrated into all aspects of human life and infrastructure. Here’s a breakdown:

Urban Centers: Cities, as centers of population and consumption, will be hubs of sustainable technology. Think smart grids, energy-efficient buildings, sustainable transportation systems, vertical farms, and advanced waste management.
Rural Areas: Sustainable agriculture, renewable energy generation, and resource management will be crucial in rural areas. This might involve precision farming, decentralized energy systems, and conservation technologies.
Industrial Sites: Manufacturing and industrial processes will need to be completely redesigned for sustainability. This includes closed-loop systems, resource efficiency, renewable energy use, and minimizing pollution.
Transportation Networks: Sustainable transportation will be essential, encompassing everything from electric vehicles and high-speed rail to advanced air travel powered by sustainable fuels.
Homes and Buildings: Buildings will likely be self-sufficient in terms of energy and resource use, incorporating solar panels, rainwater harvesting, and smart home technologies.
Global Infrastructure: Large-scale infrastructure projects, like energy grids and communication networks, will need to be designed with sustainability in mind.
Even in Space: If humanity has expanded beyond Earth by 4950, sustainable technologies will be even more critical for off-world settlements, requiring closed-loop life support systems and resource utilization.

Essentially, sustainability won’t be a niche area but a fundamental principle woven into the fabric of society. It will be a requirement for any place where humans live, work, and interact with the environment.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4950 ?

You’re asking about the methods and processes that would lead to the development and implementation of sustainable technology by 4950. It’s a complex question, but here are some key aspects:

1. Continuous Research and Development:

Fundamental Science: Ongoing research in physics, chemistry, biology, and materials science will be crucial for discovering new sustainable energy sources, materials, and processes.
Engineering and Technology: Applying scientific discoveries to develop practical technologies will require dedicated engineering efforts. This includes designing and building sustainable energy systems, transportation, infrastructure, and manufacturing processes.
Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Scientists, engineers, and other experts from various fields will need to collaborate effectively to tackle the complex challenges of sustainability.

2. Innovation and Adaptation:

Creative Problem-Solving: Developing sustainable solutions will require innovative thinking and a willingness to explore new approaches.
Adaptation and Learning: Technologies will need to be adapted and improved over time based on experience and new knowledge.
Openness to Change: Society will need to be open to adopting new technologies and changing behaviors to support sustainability.

3. Education and Awareness:

Knowledge and Skills: Future generations will need a strong understanding of sustainability principles and the skills to develop and implement sustainable technologies.
Public Awareness: Raising public awareness about the importance of sustainability and the need for technological solutions will be essential.
Global Collaboration: Sharing knowledge and technologies across borders will be crucial for achieving global sustainability.

4. Policy and Governance:

Supportive Policies: Governments will need to create policies that encourage the development and adoption of sustainable technologies. This could include funding research, providing incentives, and setting regulations.
International Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change will require international cooperation and agreements.
Ethical Considerations: As new technologies emerge, it will be important to consider their ethical implications and ensure they are used responsibly.

5. Economic and Social Factors:

Sustainable Economy: Building a sustainable economy will require shifting away from unsustainable practices and investing in green technologies.
Social Equity: Sustainable solutions should benefit everyone and not exacerbate existing inequalities.
Behavioral Change: Individuals and communities will need to adopt more sustainable lifestyles and consumption patterns.

In essence, achieving sustainable technology by 4950 will be a long-term, ongoing process that requires a concerted effort from scientists, engineers, policymakers, educators, and individuals across the globe. It will be a journey of continuous learning, innovation, and adaptation to create a world where technology and sustainability go hand in hand.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4950 ?

It’s tricky to give a specific “case study” of sustainable technology in 4950, as that would require detailed knowledge of a future we can only imagine. However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on current trends and potential advancements:

Case Study: The Integrated Bioregenerative City of Aurora, 4950

Background: By 4950, many cities have transitioned to become “bioregenerative,” meaning they function much like natural ecosystems, with closed-loop resource flows and minimal waste. Aurora is a prime example.

Technology Focus:

Advanced Bioreactors: Aurora features sophisticated bioreactors that process all organic waste, converting it into energy, fertilizer, and even building materials. These reactors utilize engineered microorganisms to break down complex molecules and synthesize useful products.
Atmospheric Carbon Capture: The city employs advanced carbon capture technology to remove CO2 from the atmosphere and convert it into fuels and other valuable products. This helps to mitigate the effects of past climate change and maintain a stable atmosphere.
Vertical Farms and Aquaponics: Aurora has integrated vertical farms and aquaponics systems within its buildings and infrastructure. These systems produce food locally, minimizing transportation needs and resource use. They also create a symbiotic relationship between plants and aquatic life, further enhancing efficiency.
Smart Grid and Energy Storage: The city’s smart grid seamlessly integrates various renewable energy sources, including solar, wind, and geothermal. Advanced energy storage solutions ensure a reliable and continuous power supply, even during periods of low renewable energy generation.
Self-Healing Materials: Buildings and infrastructure in Aurora are constructed from self-healing materials that can repair themselves when damaged. This reduces maintenance costs and extends the lifespan of infrastructure, minimizing the need for new resources.

Sustainability Outcomes:

Zero Waste: Aurora produces virtually no waste, as all materials are recycled and reused within the city’s closed-loop systems.
Carbon Neutrality: The city has achieved carbon neutrality, meaning it emits no more greenhouse gases than it removes from the atmosphere.
Food Security: Aurora’s vertical farms and aquaponics systems provide a reliable source of fresh, locally grown food for its inhabitants.
Resource Efficiency: The city uses resources efficiently, minimizing its environmental footprint and ensuring long-term sustainability.
Resilience: Aurora’s integrated and decentralized systems make it resilient to environmental changes and disruptions.

Lessons Learned:

Systems Thinking: Aurora’s success highlights the importance of systems thinking in achieving sustainability. By integrating various technologies and systems, the city has created a synergistic effect that maximizes efficiency and minimizes waste.
Technological Innovation: Continuous research and development have been crucial for developing the advanced technologies that make Aurora possible.
Social and Behavioral Change: The citizens of Aurora have embraced sustainable lifestyles and consumption patterns, supporting the city’s efforts to achieve sustainability.

This hypothetical case study illustrates how a combination of advanced technologies, systems thinking, and social change could lead to a truly sustainable city in the future. While 4950 is far off, the principles and approaches demonstrated in this case study can inform our efforts to create a more sustainable world today.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4950 ?

White Paper: Envisioning Sustainable Technology in 4950

Abstract:

Predicting the precise nature of technology centuries into the future is inherently speculative. However, by extrapolating current trends, identifying key challenges, and considering potential breakthroughs, we can construct a plausible vision of sustainable technology in 4950. This white paper explores potential advancements in energy, resource management, infrastructure, and biotechnology, emphasizing the interconnectedness of these domains and the critical role of continuous innovation and global collaboration in achieving long-term sustainability.

1. Introduction:

The pursuit of sustainability is a defining challenge of our time. While current efforts focus on mitigating immediate environmental concerns, envisioning the technological landscape of 4950 allows us to consider the long-term trajectory of human ingenuity and its potential to create a truly harmonious relationship with our planet. This paper explores possible future technologies, acknowledging that the actual path may diverge, but emphasizing the importance of present-day actions in shaping that future.

2. Energy: Beyond Renewables:

While solar, wind, and geothermal energy are likely to be highly advanced and ubiquitous by 4950, we may also see the widespread adoption of:

Fusion Power: Controlled nuclear fusion, if achieved, could provide a clean, virtually limitless energy source.
Space-Based Solar Power: Harvesting solar energy in space and beaming it to Earth could provide a consistent and abundant supply.
Advanced Energy Storage: Highly efficient and scalable energy storage solutions will be crucial for balancing intermittent renewable sources and ensuring a stable energy supply. This could involve advanced battery technologies, pumped hydro storage, or even entirely new paradigms.

3. Resource Management: The Circular Economy:

By 4950, the concept of a “circular economy” will likely be fully realized, with:

Closed-Loop Systems: Manufacturing processes will be designed to minimize waste and maximize resource reuse. Products will be designed for disassembly and material recovery.
Advanced Recycling Technologies: Highly efficient recycling processes will be able to extract valuable materials from even the most complex products.
Biomanufacturing: Using biological systems to produce materials and products could offer a sustainable alternative to traditional manufacturing methods.

4. Infrastructure: Smart and Adaptive:

Future infrastructure will be characterized by:

Smart Cities: Urban centers will be highly interconnected and optimized for sustainability, with smart grids, efficient transportation systems, and buildings that generate their own energy.
Resilient Infrastructure: Infrastructure will be designed to withstand the impacts of climate change and other environmental challenges. Self-healing materials and adaptive systems will minimize maintenance needs.
Decentralized Systems: Decentralized energy and water systems will enhance resilience and reduce reliance on large-scale infrastructure.

5. Biotechnology: Nature as Inspiration:

Biotechnology will play a crucial role in creating sustainable solutions:

Biomimicry: Designing technologies inspired by nature’s solutions, such as self-assembling materials or highly efficient energy conversion processes.
Synthetic Biology: Engineering biological systems to perform useful tasks, such as producing biofuels or cleaning up pollution.
Sustainable Agriculture: Advanced agricultural techniques, including vertical farming and precision agriculture, will ensure food security while minimizing resource use.

6. The Importance of Interconnectedness:

The sustainable technologies of 4950 will not exist in isolation. They will be interconnected and integrated, creating synergistic effects that maximize efficiency and minimize environmental impact. For example, bioreactors could provide energy for smart cities, while biomanufacturing could produce materials for resilient infrastructure.

7. Challenges and Opportunities:

Achieving this vision of sustainable technology will require overcoming significant challenges:

Scientific Breakthroughs: Continued investment in fundamental research will be essential for developing new technologies.
Global Collaboration: Addressing global challenges like climate change will require international cooperation and knowledge sharing.
Ethical Considerations: As new technologies emerge, it will be crucial to consider their ethical implications and ensure they are used responsibly.

8. Conclusion:

While the specifics of technology in 4950 remain uncertain, the pursuit of sustainability will undoubtedly be a driving force behind innovation. By focusing on continuous research and development, fostering global collaboration, and embracing ethical considerations, we can pave the way for a future where technology and sustainability go hand in hand, ensuring a healthy planet for generations to come. The journey begins today, with the choices we make and the investments we prioritize.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4950 ?

It’s fascinating to imagine the industrial applications of sustainable technology in 4950! While we can’t know for sure, here are some plausible scenarios based on current trends and potential advancements:

1. Advanced Manufacturing with Biomanufacturing and Closed-Loop Systems:

Biomanufacturing: Imagine factories that utilize engineered microorganisms to produce materials, chemicals, and even complex products. This could revolutionize manufacturing, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and traditional chemical processes.
Closed-Loop Systems: Industrial processes would likely operate on closed-loop principles, with minimal waste and maximum resource recovery. Advanced recycling technologies would enable the reuse of virtually all materials, creating a truly circular economy.
Personalized Production: 3D printing and other advanced manufacturing techniques could enable highly personalized production, with goods tailored to individual needs and preferences. This could reduce waste and optimize resource use.

2. Energy-Intensive Industries Powered by Sustainable Sources:

Fusion Power: Industries like steel manufacturing or aluminum production, which are currently energy-intensive, could be powered by clean and abundant fusion energy.
Space-Based Solar Power: Energy-intensive industries could also benefit from space-based solar power, receiving a continuous and abundant supply of energy beamed from orbit.
Advanced Energy Storage: Highly efficient energy storage solutions would ensure a stable and reliable power supply for industries, even during periods of low renewable energy generation.

3. Resource Extraction and Processing with Minimal Environmental Impact:

Sustainable Mining: Advanced technologies could enable the extraction of resources from the Earth with minimal environmental impact, using techniques that reduce waste, minimize habitat disruption, and prevent pollution.
Asteroid Mining: If humanity has expanded beyond Earth by 4950, asteroid mining could provide access to valuable resources with minimal environmental impact on our planet.
In-Situ Resource Utilization: On other planets or celestial bodies, industries could utilize in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) to extract and process resources locally, reducing the need for transportation from Earth.

4. Sustainable Agriculture and Food Production:

Vertical Farms and Aquaponics: Large-scale vertical farms and aquaponics systems could be integrated into urban and industrial areas, providing a sustainable source of fresh, locally grown food.
Precision Agriculture: Advanced technologies could enable highly efficient and sustainable agriculture, with precise application of resources like water and fertilizers, minimizing environmental impact.
Cultivated Meat and Alternative Proteins: The production of cultivated meat and other alternative proteins could reduce reliance on traditional animal agriculture, which is resource-intensive and contributes to greenhouse gas emissions.

5. Infrastructure Development and Maintenance with Self-Healing Materials:

Self-Healing Materials: Industries involved in infrastructure development and maintenance could utilize self-healing materials that can repair themselves when damaged, reducing maintenance costs and extending the lifespan of infrastructure.
Modular Construction: Modular construction techniques could enable the rapid and efficient assembly of buildings and infrastructure, minimizing waste and resource use.
Smart Infrastructure: Smart sensors and monitoring systems could optimize the performance of infrastructure and identify potential problems before they occur, improving efficiency and reducing the need for repairs.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology could transform industries by 4950. The key themes are likely to be:

Resource efficiency and circularity: Minimizing waste and maximizing resource reuse.
Clean energy: Utilizing renewable energy sources and advanced energy storage solutions.
Biotechnology: Harnessing the power of biology for manufacturing, resource processing, and other industrial applications.
Advanced materials: Developing and utilizing materials with unique properties, such as self-healing capabilities or high strength-to-weight ratios.

By embracing these principles and continuing to innovate, industries can play a crucial role in creating a sustainable future for humanity.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4950 ?

It’s exciting to think about the research and development that would be necessary to achieve the sustainable technologies of 4950! Here’s a glimpse into some potential areas of focus:

1. Fundamental Science:

New Energy Sources:
- Harnessing Zero-Point Energy: Exploring the possibility of tapping into the zero-point energy of the universe, a theoretical, inexhaustible source of energy.
- Exotic Matter and Energy: Investigating the potential of exotic matter and energy sources, such as dark matter or other theoretical phenomena, for energy generation.
Materials Science:
- Programmable Matter: Developing materials that can be programmed to change their properties on demand, enabling dynamic adaptation to changing needs.
- Self-Healing and Adaptive Materials: Creating materials that can repair themselves when damaged or adapt to changing environmental conditions.
- Superconductors at Room Temperature: Achieving superconductivity at room temperature, which would revolutionize energy transmission and storage.
Biology and Biotechnology:
- Synthetic Biology: Engineering biological systems to perform useful tasks, such as producing biofuels, creating new materials, or cleaning up pollution.
- Biomimicry: Studying and mimicking natural processes to design sustainable technologies, such as self-assembling materials or highly efficient energy conversion systems.

2. Engineering and Technology:

Energy Systems:
- Fusion Reactor Design: Developing practical and efficient fusion reactors for clean and abundant energy generation.
- Space-Based Solar Power Systems: Designing and deploying large-scale space-based solar power systems to harvest solar energy in space.
- Advanced Energy Storage: Creating highly efficient and scalable energy storage solutions, such as advanced batteries or other novel storage methods.
Resource Management:
- Closed-Loop Manufacturing: Developing manufacturing processes that operate on closed-loop principles, with minimal waste and maximum resource recovery.
- Advanced Recycling Technologies: Creating highly efficient recycling processes that can extract valuable materials from even the most complex products.
- Biomanufacturing: Developing biomanufacturing techniques to produce materials and products using biological systems.
Infrastructure:
- Smart Cities Technologies: Designing and implementing smart city technologies, such as smart grids, efficient transportation systems, and self-healing infrastructure.
- Resilient Infrastructure: Developing infrastructure that can withstand the impacts of climate change and other environmental challenges.
- Decentralized Systems: Creating decentralized energy and water systems to enhance resilience and reduce reliance on large-scale infrastructure.
Biotechnology:
- Bioreactors and Bioprocesses: Designing and optimizing bioreactors and bioprocesses for various applications, such as waste treatment, resource recovery, and biomanufacturing.
- Genetic Engineering and Synthetic Biology: Developing advanced techniques for genetic engineering and synthetic biology to create new biological systems with desired properties.
- Sustainable Agriculture Technologies: Developing sustainable agriculture technologies, such as vertical farms, precision agriculture, and cultivated meat production.

3. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

Collaboration Across Disciplines: Fostering collaboration between scientists, engineers, and other experts from various disciplines to tackle the complex challenges of sustainability.
Global Research Networks: Establishing global research networks to share knowledge and accelerate the development of sustainable technologies.
Public-Private Partnerships: Encouraging public-private partnerships to fund research and development and commercialize sustainable technologies.

4. Ethical Considerations:

Responsible Innovation: Ensuring that research and development in sustainable technology is conducted responsibly, with careful consideration of ethical implications.
Environmental Impact Assessment: Conducting thorough environmental impact assessments for new technologies to ensure they are truly sustainable.
Social Equity: Ensuring that the benefits of sustainable technologies are shared equitably and do not exacerbate existing inequalities.

The research and development of sustainable technology for 4950 will be a long-term, ongoing process that requires a concerted effort from scientists, engineers, policymakers, and individuals across the globe. It will be a journey of continuous learning, innovation, and adaptation to create a world where technology and sustainability go hand in hand.

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.