Sustainable technology of 4850

79 / 100

Sustainable technology of 4850 ?

This is for informational purposes only. For medical advice or diagnosis, consult a professional.

It appears you’re asking about sustainable technology in the year 4850. While it’s impossible to predict the future with certainty, we can explore some possibilities based on current trends and potential advancements:

Potential Sustainable Technologies in 4850:

Advanced Energy Systems: Fusion power or other revolutionary energy sources could provide clean and abundant energy.
Closed-Loop Resource Management: Technologies for complete recycling and resource recovery could eliminate waste and pollution.
Biotechnology and Biomimicry: Advanced biotechnology might create materials and processes inspired by nature, minimizing environmental impact.
Space-Based Infrastructure: Space-based solar power or resource extraction could reduce reliance on Earth’s limited resources.

Important Considerations:

Ethical Implications: Technological advancements must be guided by ethical considerations to ensure sustainability and social responsibility.
Planetary Boundaries: Even with advanced technology, respecting planetary boundaries and ecological limits will be crucial for long-term sustainability.
Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity will require international cooperation and shared responsibility.

Additional Resources:

By exploring these possibilities and considering the ethical and global dimensions of sustainability, we can work towards a future where technology and human society coexist in harmony with the planet.

What is Sustainable technology of 4850 ?

Potential Sustainable Technologies in 4850:

Advanced Energy Systems: Fusion power or other revolutionary energy sources could provide clean and abundant energy.
Closed-Loop Resource Management: Technologies for complete recycling and resource recovery could eliminate waste and pollution.
Biotechnology and Biomimicry: Advanced biotechnology might create materials and processes inspired by nature, minimizing environmental impact.
Space-Based Infrastructure: Space-based solar power or resource extraction could reduce reliance on Earth’s limited resources.

Important Considerations:

Ethical Implications: Technological advancements must be guided by ethical considerations to ensure sustainability and social responsibility.
Planetary Boundaries: Even with advanced technology, respecting planetary boundaries and ecological limits will be crucial for long-term sustainability.
Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity will require international cooperation and shared responsibility.

Additional Resources:

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4850 ?

This is for informational purposes only. For medical advice or diagnosis, consult a professional.

Potential Sustainable Technologies in 4850:

Advanced Energy Systems: Fusion power or other revolutionary energy sources could provide clean and abundant energy.
Closed-Loop Resource Management: Technologies for complete recycling and resource recovery could eliminate waste and pollution.
Biotechnology and Biomimicry: Advanced biotechnology might create materials and processes inspired by nature, minimizing environmental impact.
Space-Based Infrastructure: Space-based solar power or resource extraction could reduce reliance on Earth’s limited resources.

Important Considerations:

Ethical Implications: Technological advancements must be guided by ethical considerations to ensure sustainability and social responsibility.
Planetary Boundaries: Even with advanced technology, respecting planetary boundaries and ecological limits will be crucial for long-term sustainability.
Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity will require international cooperation and shared responsibility.

Additional Resources:

When is required Sustainable technology of 4850 ?

It’s impossible to definitively say when sustainable technology will be absolutely required in the year 4850. However, we can infer based on current trends and the long-term view of sustainability:

The Need is Already Present: The need for sustainable technology isn’t something that will suddenly appear in 4850. It’s a critical need now. The choices we make today, and in the coming decades and centuries, will determine the state of the world in 4850. The more sustainable we are now, the less drastic the changes needed later.
Continuous Evolution: Sustainable technology isn’t a single solution that will be “achieved” at some point. It’s an ongoing process of development and adaptation. What’s considered sustainable in 2024 will likely be outdated and insufficient in 4850. There will be a constant need for innovation and improvement.
Long-Term Challenges: Even if we make significant progress in sustainability now, there will likely still be long-term challenges to address in the future. These could include:
- Resource Depletion: Even with recycling and efficiency, some resources may become scarce over very long timescales.
- Climate Change Impacts: The effects of climate change may continue to unfold for centuries, requiring ongoing adaptation and mitigation.
- Population Growth: Managing resources and environmental impact for a potentially much larger population could be a challenge.
- Unforeseen Issues: New environmental problems or technological challenges may arise that we can’t predict today.
4850 as a Symbolic Date: Thinking about 4850 is a useful exercise in long-term thinking. It forces us to consider the very distant consequences of our actions. While we can’t know exactly what the world will be like then, the principles of sustainability – living within planetary limits, conserving resources, and minimizing our impact – will almost certainly still be essential.

In short: The need for sustainable technology is now, it will be crucial throughout the intervening centuries, and it will almost certainly still be necessary in 4850, even if the specific technologies and challenges are very different from what we can imagine today.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4850 ?

It’s more accurate to say where sustainable technology will be essential in 4850, rather than “required.” “Required” implies a mandate, while “essential” speaks to the fundamental need for it to support civilization and the planet. Given the vast timescale, we can’t predict specific political structures or global governance, but we can infer the environments where sustainability will be crucial:

Everywhere on Earth: Sustainable practices will need to be integrated into every aspect of human life and activity across the globe. This includes:
- Urban Centers: Cities will likely be hubs of technological innovation and resource management, requiring highly efficient systems for energy, water, waste, and transportation.
- Rural Areas: Sustainable agriculture, resource extraction, and ecosystem management will be crucial for food production and maintaining biodiversity.
- Remote and Extreme Environments: Even in deserts, polar regions, or deep oceans, sustainable technologies will be needed if human presence is maintained.
Potentially Beyond Earth: If humanity has expanded beyond Earth by 4850, sustainability will be even more critical in:
- Space Habitats: Closed-loop life support systems, resource recycling, and energy independence will be essential for off-world settlements.
- Other Planets or Moons: If colonization or resource extraction occurs on other celestial bodies, it will need to be done in a way that minimizes environmental impact and respects any potential extraterrestrial life.
The Digital Realm: Even in a highly digital future, sustainability will be crucial for the infrastructure supporting it:
- Data Centers: These will require massive amounts of energy, so sustainable energy sources and cooling systems will be essential.
- Manufacturing: Producing and recycling electronic devices and other digital technologies will need to be done sustainably.
The Human Body: Sustainable technologies could even extend to how we interact with our own biology:
- Personal Health: Sustainable healthcare practices and technologies could minimize waste and environmental impact.
- Human Augmentation: If genetic engineering or other forms of human enhancement become common, they would ideally be developed and used in a way that is sustainable and ethical.

In short, by 4850, the principles and practices of sustainability will need to be deeply embedded in every environment where human activity takes place, whether it’s on Earth, in space, or even within the digital and biological realms. It will be a fundamental requirement for the long-term well-being of both humanity and the planet (and potentially beyond).

How is required Sustainable technology of 4850 ?

It’s more accurate to ask why sustainable technology will be essential in 4850, as “how” implies the method of implementation. While we can’t predict the exact technologies, we can understand the fundamental reasons why sustainability will be crucial:

Planetary Boundaries: Even with advanced technology, the fundamental limits of Earth’s resources and ecosystems will likely still exist. Sustainable technology will be necessary to live within these boundaries, ensuring that resource use doesn’t exceed the planet’s capacity to regenerate.
Resource Scarcity: While recycling and resource efficiency can extend the availability of resources, some may become increasingly scarce over very long timescales. Sustainable technologies will be needed to minimize resource consumption, find alternatives, and create closed-loop systems.
Climate Change Impacts: The effects of climate change may continue to unfold for centuries, even with aggressive mitigation efforts today. Sustainable technologies will be essential for adapting to these changes, minimizing further warming, and potentially even reversing some of the damage.
Population Growth (Potential): While population projections are uncertain over such long timescales, it’s possible that the human population could still be significant in 4850. Sustainable technologies will be needed to provide for everyone without exceeding planetary limits.
Environmental Degradation: Even if we make progress on some fronts, other environmental problems may emerge or persist. Sustainable technologies will be necessary to address these challenges and maintain healthy ecosystems.
Interconnectedness: In a highly interconnected world (as is likely in 4850), the impacts of environmental problems or resource scarcity in one region can quickly spread globally. Sustainable technologies will be needed to ensure resilience and stability on a global scale.
Ethical Considerations: Future generations will likely have even stronger expectations for environmental stewardship and social justice. Sustainable technologies will be needed to ensure a fair and equitable distribution of resources and a healthy planet for all.
Long-Term Survival: Ultimately, the long-term survival of human civilization (and potentially any off-world settlements) will depend on our ability to live sustainably. Sustainable technologies will be essential for ensuring that future generations have the resources and environment they need to thrive.

In short, sustainable technology in 4850 will be essential because it will be the only way to ensure the long-term well-being of humanity and the planet in the face of resource constraints, environmental challenges, and the ethical imperative to leave a healthy world for future generations.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4850 ?

This is for informational purposes only. For medical advice or diagnosis, consult a professional.

Potential Sustainable Technologies in 4850:

Advanced Energy Systems: Fusion power or other revolutionary energy sources could provide clean and abundant energy.
Closed-Loop Resource Management: Technologies for complete recycling and resource recovery could eliminate waste and pollution.
Biotechnology and Biomimicry: Advanced biotechnology might create materials and processes inspired by nature, minimizing environmental impact.
Space-Based Infrastructure: Space-based solar power or resource extraction could reduce reliance on Earth’s limited resources.

Important Considerations:

Ethical Implications: Technological advancements must be guided by ethical considerations to ensure sustainability and social responsibility.
Planetary Boundaries: Even with advanced technology, respecting planetary boundaries and ecological limits will be crucial for long-term sustainability.
Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity will require international cooperation and shared responsibility.

Additional Resources:

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4850 ?

Sustainable Technology in 4850: A Speculative White Paper

Disclaimer: This white paper is a speculative exploration of potential sustainable technologies in the year 4850. It is based on current trends, scientific principles, and imaginative extrapolation, and should not be taken as a definitive prediction of the future. The nature of technological advancement and societal change over such a long timescale makes precise forecasting impossible.

Abstract:

Humanity’s long-term survival and prosperity depend on achieving true sustainability. This paper examines the potential landscape of sustainable technologies in the year 4850, considering the challenges and opportunities that may lie ahead. It explores possible advancements in energy, resource management, biotechnology, and other key areas, while acknowledging the ethical and societal considerations crucial for ensuring a sustainable future.

1. Introduction:

The concept of sustainability encompasses meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Achieving this over a timescale of nearly three millennia requires a fundamental shift in how we interact with the planet and utilize technology. This paper explores potential technological developments that might enable a sustainable civilization in 4850.

2. Potential Technological Domains:

2.1 Advanced Energy Systems: Fossil fuels will be a distant memory. Likely candidates for primary energy sources include:
- Fusion Power: Controlled nuclear fusion, if achieved, could provide clean, abundant, and safe energy.
- Space-Based Solar Power: Harvesting solar energy in space and beaming it to Earth could offer a continuous and inexhaustible supply.
- Geothermal Energy: Advanced geothermal technologies could tap into the Earth’s internal heat with minimal environmental impact.
- Zero-Point Energy (Speculative): While highly speculative, the potential for harnessing zero-point energy or other exotic energy sources cannot be entirely ruled out.
2.2 Closed-Loop Resource Management: A circular economy will be essential. Technologies for complete recycling and resource recovery will be highly advanced:
- Molecular Manufacturing: The ability to manipulate matter at the atomic level could enable on-demand creation and recycling of materials.
- Advanced Bioremediation: Microorganisms and other biological systems could be used to break down pollutants and regenerate ecosystems.
- Waste as a Resource: “Waste” as we know it will likely cease to exist, with all materials being repurposed or reintegrated into the ecosystem.
2.3 Biotechnology and Biomimicry: Drawing inspiration from nature will be a cornerstone of sustainable technology:
- Bio-Based Materials: Materials engineered from biological sources could be both durable and biodegradable.
- Synthetic Biology: The ability to design and engineer new biological systems could lead to breakthroughs in medicine, agriculture, and manufacturing.
- Ecosystem Restoration: Advanced biotechnology could play a crucial role in restoring damaged ecosystems and preserving biodiversity.
2.4 Space-Based Infrastructure: Humanity’s presence in space could become integral to sustainability:
- Space-Based Resource Extraction: Mining asteroids or other celestial bodies could provide access to resources that are scarce on Earth.
- Space Colonization (Potential): If humanity expands beyond Earth, sustainable technologies will be crucial for establishing self-sufficient settlements.
- Planetary Defense: Technologies for mitigating asteroid impacts or other existential threats could be considered part of a long-term sustainability strategy.

3. Ethical and Societal Considerations:

Technological advancements alone are not sufficient for achieving sustainability. Ethical considerations and societal structures play a crucial role:

Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity will require unprecedented levels of international cooperation.
Equitable Access: Sustainable technologies must be accessible to all, regardless of location or socioeconomic status.
Environmental Stewardship: A deep respect for the natural world and a commitment to preserving biodiversity will be essential.
Technological Governance: Robust mechanisms will be needed to ensure that technological advancements are used responsibly and ethically.

4. Conclusion:

While predicting the future is inherently uncertain, exploring potential pathways to sustainability is a vital exercise. By considering the technological possibilities and the ethical imperatives, we can begin to shape a future where humanity and the planet thrive together for millennia to come. The journey to a truly sustainable future begins today, with the choices we make and the technologies we develop. The world of 4850 will be a direct consequence of our actions in the present.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4850 ?

This is for informational purposes only. For medical advice or diagnosis, consult a professional.

Potential Sustainable Technologies in 4850:

Advanced Energy Systems: Fusion power or other revolutionary energy sources could provide clean and abundant energy.
Closed-Loop Resource Management: Technologies for complete recycling and resource recovery could eliminate waste and pollution.
Biotechnology and Biomimicry: Advanced biotechnology might create materials and processes inspired by nature, minimizing environmental impact.
Space-Based Infrastructure: Space-based solar power or resource extraction could reduce reliance on Earth’s limited resources.

Important Considerations:

Ethical Implications: Technological advancements must be guided by ethical considerations to ensure sustainability and social responsibility.
Planetary Boundaries: Even with advanced technology, respecting planetary boundaries and ecological limits will be crucial for long-term sustainability.
Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity will require international cooperation and shared responsibility.

Additional Resources:

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4850 ?

This is for informational purposes only. For medical advice or diagnosis, consult a professional.

Potential Sustainable Technologies in 4850:

Advanced Energy Systems: Fusion power or other revolutionary energy sources could provide clean and abundant energy.
Closed-Loop Resource Management: Technologies for complete recycling and resource recovery could eliminate waste and pollution.
Biotechnology and Biomimicry: Advanced biotechnology might create materials and processes inspired by nature, minimizing environmental impact.
Space-Based Infrastructure: Space-based solar power or resource extraction could reduce reliance on Earth’s limited resources.

Important Considerations:

Ethical Implications: Technological advancements must be guided by ethical considerations to ensure sustainability and social responsibility.
Planetary Boundaries: Even with advanced technology, respecting planetary boundaries and ecological limits will be crucial for long-term sustainability.
Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity will require international cooperation and shared responsibility.

Additional Resources:

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

Sustainable technology of 4850

Sustainable technology of 4850 ?

What is Sustainable technology of 4850 ?

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4850 ?

When is required Sustainable technology of 4850 ?

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4850 ?

How is required Sustainable technology of 4850 ?

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4850 ?

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4850 ?

Sustainable Technology in 4850: A Speculative White Paper

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4850 ?

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4850 ?

References

Recommended HashTags

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply