Leave a Comment / Blog, ustainable technology of 4790 / By
79 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

Sustainable technology of 4790 ?

It seems you might be asking about the Intel Core i7-4790 processor and its role in sustainable technology. While the processor itself was released in 2014, it can still contribute to sustainability in some ways:

  • Longevity: If the processor is still in use, it means a computer system is being utilized for a longer period, reducing the need for new hardware production and thus conserving resources and energy.
  • Refurbishment and Reuse: Older systems with this processor can be refurbished and reused, extending their lifespan and reducing e-waste.
  • Specific Applications: The processor might be suitable for specific tasks or applications that don’t require the latest technology, allowing for continued use without needing to upgrade to a more power-hungry system.

However, it’s important to note that newer processors generally offer better energy efficiency and performance. If you’re looking to upgrade, consider newer Intel processors or other options with a focus on power efficiency and sustainability.

Here are some resources that might be helpful:

Remember, sustainable technology is a broad field, and even older hardware can play a role in reducing our environmental impact through longevity and reuse.

What is Sustainable technology of 4790 ?

It seems you’re interested in how the Intel Core i7-4790 processor, released in 2014, relates to sustainable technology. While it’s not a cutting-edge, energy-efficient processor by today’s standards, it can still contribute to sustainability in a few ways:

  • Extending Lifespan: If the processor is still in use, it means a computer system is being utilized for a longer period. This reduces the need for new hardware production, which in turn conserves resources and energy.
  • Reuse and Refurbishment: Older systems with this processor can be refurbished and reused, extending their lifespan and reducing electronic waste.
  • Suitable for Specific Tasks: The processor might be suitable for specific tasks or applications that don’t demand the latest technology. This allows for continued use without needing to upgrade to a more power-hungry system.

However, it’s crucial to acknowledge that newer processors generally offer better energy efficiency and performance. If you’re considering an upgrade, it’s wise to explore newer Intel processors or other options specifically designed with power efficiency and sustainability in mind.

Here are some resources that you might find helpful:

Remember, sustainable technology is a broad field, and even older hardware can contribute to reducing our environmental impact through longevity and reuse.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4790 ?

It seems you’re asking who benefits from the sustainable aspects of using an Intel Core i7-4790 processor. Here’s a breakdown:

  • Current Users: If you’re currently using a system with this processor, you’re already contributing to sustainability by extending the life of your hardware. This reduces the demand for new devices and minimizes e-waste.
  • Those Seeking Affordable Computing: Individuals or organizations looking for cost-effective computing solutions can benefit from systems with this processor. They can get a functional machine without needing to purchase the latest, most resource-intensive hardware.
  • Refurbishers and Recyclers: Companies that refurbish and resell older computers contribute to sustainability by giving these systems a second life. This reduces e-waste and the need for new production.
  • Developers with Specific Needs: Some software developers might find this processor sufficient for specific tasks or testing purposes, avoiding the need for more powerful and energy-consuming systems.

In essence, anyone who can utilize a system with this processor for its intended purpose contributes to sustainable technology practices. By prolonging the life of existing hardware, we reduce the environmental impact associated with manufacturing new devices and disposing of old ones.

It’s important to remember that while the Intel Core i7-4790 can contribute to sustainability through continued use, newer processors generally offer better energy efficiency. When considering an upgrade, it’s always wise to prioritize energy-efficient options to minimize your environmental footprint.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4790 ?

The “need” for the sustainable aspects of the i7-4790 arises in several situations:

  • When Budget is a Primary Concern: If someone needs a functional computer but has a limited budget, a used machine with an i7-4790 might be a good option. It avoids the cost and environmental impact of buying brand-new.
  • When Performance Requirements are Moderate: For everyday tasks like browsing, office work, or light multimedia consumption, the i7-4790 is often still sufficient. Using it for these tasks is more sustainable than buying a new, high-performance (and potentially more energy-intensive) machine when it’s not necessary.
  • When Extending the Life of Existing Hardware: If you already own a computer with this processor, continuing to use it is a sustainable choice. It postpones the need for a replacement, reducing e-waste and the demand for new manufacturing.
  • For Specific Legacy Software or Hardware Compatibility: Sometimes, older systems are needed to run specific software or interface with older hardware that isn’t compatible with newer operating systems or hardware. In these cases, keeping the i7-4790 system running is the most practical and sustainable option.
  • In Refurbishment and Reuse Programs: Organizations that refurbish and resell computers play a crucial role in sustainability. The i7-4790 is a common processor found in these refurbished machines, giving them a second life.

It’s important to remember that while the i7-4790 can be part of a sustainable approach, it’s not necessarily the most sustainable option in every case. If you’re buying a new computer, prioritize energy-efficient processors. The key is to match the hardware to the task. Using an older, less efficient processor for demanding tasks can actually consume more energy than a newer, more efficient one, even if the newer one is more powerful.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4790 ?

The “where” for the sustainable use of an i7-4790 processor is less about a specific geographic location and more about the context of its use. Here are some “where” scenarios:

  • In Homes: For everyday computing tasks like browsing, email, and light productivity work, a home computer with an i7-4790 can be perfectly adequate and sustainable.
  • In Offices: For general office work, especially in smaller businesses or for employees with less demanding computing needs, these systems can still be viable.
  • In Schools: For student workstations or lab computers used for basic tasks, systems with this processor can provide a cost-effective and relatively sustainable solution.
  • In Developing Countries: Where access to newer technology might be limited or cost-prohibitive, refurbished computers with i7-4790 processors can provide valuable computing resources.
  • In Refurbishment Centers: These are the key “where” locations. Refurbishment centers take older computers, including those with i7-4790s, and give them a second life, reducing e-waste and providing affordable computing options.
  • In E-waste Recycling Facilities: Even when a computer with an i7-4790 reaches the end of its usable life, responsible recycling facilities are a crucial “where.” They recover valuable materials and prevent hazardous components from entering the environment.
  • In Specific Industrial or Embedded Systems: Sometimes, older processors are used in specialized industrial equipment or embedded systems where compatibility and reliability are prioritized over the latest performance. Extending the life of these systems contributes to sustainability.

So, the “where” is less about a physical place and more about the application and lifecycle stage of the i7-4790. It’s about finding the right niche where this processor can still perform a useful function, thereby maximizing its lifespan and minimizing its environmental impact.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4790 ?

The “how” of requiring sustainable technology related to the i7-4790 is about how we approach its use and management. It’s not about the processor itself requiring sustainability, but rather how we can use it sustainably. Here’s a breakdown:

  • Extending its lifespan: This is the most crucial “how.” By continuing to use systems with this processor for as long as they are functional and meet your needs, you delay the need for new hardware production, which conserves resources and energy.
  • Refurbishment and reuse: Donating or selling older computers for refurbishment gives them a second life. This is a key “how” for maximizing the value of the i7-4790 and minimizing e-waste.
  • Matching the task to the hardware: Using the i7-4790 for tasks it’s well-suited for (like general office work, browsing, or light multimedia) is a “how” of sustainable use. Avoid using it for highly demanding tasks that would push it to its limits and potentially consume more energy than a newer, more efficient processor.
  • Responsible recycling: When the system is truly at the end of its life, responsible recycling is essential. This “how” ensures that valuable materials are recovered and hazardous components are disposed of properly, minimizing environmental impact.
  • Power management: Optimizing power settings on systems with the i7-4790 can contribute to energy savings. This “how” includes things like adjusting sleep modes, screen brightness, and other power-saving features.
  • Awareness and education: Promoting awareness about the importance of extending the life of existing hardware and responsible e-waste disposal is a crucial “how.” Educating users about sustainable computing practices is key to maximizing the positive impact.

In short, the “how” of requiring sustainable technology with the i7-4790 is about a combination of practical steps (extending lifespan, refurbishment, recycling) and mindful usage (matching tasks to hardware, power management, awareness). It’s about making conscious choices to minimize the environmental footprint associated with this older processor.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4790 ?

Let’s create a hypothetical case study to illustrate the sustainable technology aspects of the i7-4790:

Case Study: The Green Office Initiative

Background: “Green Office Solutions” (GOS), a small business specializing in sustainable office practices, is upgrading their computer systems. They have a limited budget and are committed to minimizing their environmental impact. They are considering two options:

  • Option 1: Purchasing brand new, high-performance computers with the latest processors.
  • Option 2: Acquiring refurbished computers with Intel i7-4790 processors.

Analysis:

  • Option 1 (New Computers): While newer computers offer higher performance and potentially better energy efficiency per unit of work, the manufacturing process has a significant environmental footprint. This includes resource extraction, energy consumption, and transportation. The higher upfront cost is also a factor for GOS.
  • Option 2 (Refurbished i7-4790 Computers): Refurbished computers have a much lower environmental impact as they extend the life of existing hardware. The i7-4790, while not the latest, is still capable of handling the daily tasks required by GOS, such as word processing, spreadsheets, email, and web browsing. The lower cost of refurbished machines is also a significant advantage.

Findings:

GOS conducted a cost-benefit analysis considering both financial and environmental factors. They determined that:

  • The performance difference between the new computers and the refurbished i7-4790 systems was negligible for their specific needs.
  • The environmental impact of purchasing new computers was significantly higher due to the manufacturing process.
  • The cost savings from choosing refurbished systems allowed GOS to invest in other sustainability initiatives, such as energy-efficient lighting and recycling programs.

Conclusion:

GOS chose Option 2 and acquired the refurbished computers with i7-4790 processors. This decision allowed them to:

  • Reduce their carbon footprint by minimizing the demand for new hardware production.
  • Save money, which was reinvested in other green initiatives.
  • Demonstrate their commitment to sustainable practices to their clients.

Key Takeaways:

This case study illustrates how extending the life of older hardware, like systems with the i7-4790, can be a sustainable choice. It highlights the importance of matching technology to actual needs and considering the full lifecycle environmental impact, not just the performance specifications. Even though newer processors might be more energy-efficient on a per-task basis, the energy embodied in manufacturing them can outweigh those gains, especially if the older processor is sufficient for the task at hand. Refurbishment and reuse are key strategies in sustainable technology practices.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4790 ?

White Paper: The Role of the Intel i7-4790 in Sustainable Computing

Abstract: This white paper examines the role of the Intel i7-4790 processor, released in 2014, within the context of sustainable computing. While newer processors offer improved performance and energy efficiency, the i7-4790 can still contribute to sustainability through extended use, refurbishment, and targeted application. This paper explores these avenues, emphasizing the importance of lifecycle assessment and responsible e-waste management in maximizing the sustainable value of older hardware.

1. Introduction:

Sustainable computing aims to minimize the environmental impact of computing devices throughout their lifecycle, from manufacturing to disposal. This involves considering energy consumption, resource depletion, and e-waste generation. While technological advancements often focus on performance improvements, the sustainability implications of hardware choices are increasingly important. The Intel i7-4790, though not a cutting-edge processor, represents a significant installed base and its continued use and management can contribute to sustainable practices.

2. The i7-4790: Performance and Efficiency Considerations:

The i7-4790, while adequate for many common tasks, is less energy-efficient than newer processors on a per-task basis. However, this doesn’t automatically disqualify it from a sustainable perspective. The embodied energy in manufacturing new hardware is substantial. Therefore, extending the lifespan of existing i7-4790 systems can be more sustainable than replacing them with newer, more efficient machines if the performance is sufficient for the intended use.

3. Sustainable Strategies for the i7-4790:

  • Extending Lifespan: The most direct way to enhance the sustainability of the i7-4790 is to continue using systems containing it for as long as they meet the user’s needs. This reduces the demand for new hardware, minimizing resource consumption and manufacturing-related emissions.
  • Refurbishment and Reuse: Refurbishing older computers with i7-4790 processors and making them available for reuse is a crucial aspect of sustainable computing. This gives these systems a second life, reducing e-waste and providing affordable computing options to individuals and organizations.
  • Targeted Application: Matching the i7-4790’s capabilities to specific tasks is essential. Using it for general office work, browsing, email, and other less demanding applications optimizes its use and avoids unnecessary energy consumption that might occur if a more powerful (and potentially more energy-intensive to manufacture) processor were used for these basic tasks.
  • Responsible E-waste Management: When systems containing the i7-4790 reach the end of their usable life, responsible recycling is paramount. This involves recovering valuable materials and ensuring proper disposal of hazardous components, preventing environmental contamination.

4. Lifecycle Assessment:

A comprehensive lifecycle assessment (LCA) is crucial for evaluating the true environmental impact of computing hardware. LCAs consider all stages, from raw material extraction and manufacturing to use and end-of-life management. While newer processors may have better energy efficiency during operation, the energy embodied in their production can be significant. Therefore, extending the life of existing hardware, like systems with the i7-4790, can sometimes have a lower overall environmental impact than replacing it with a “more efficient” new processor.

5. Case Study (Hypothetical):

A small business with basic computing needs (word processing, spreadsheets, email) could choose between purchasing new computers with the latest processors or acquiring refurbished systems with i7-4790s. A lifecycle assessment might reveal that the refurbished systems have a lower overall environmental impact due to the reduced manufacturing footprint, even if their operational energy consumption is slightly higher.

6. Conclusion:

The Intel i7-4790, while not the most recent technology, can still play a role in sustainable computing. By extending its lifespan, promoting refurbishment and reuse, targeting its application, and ensuring responsible e-waste management, we can minimize the environmental impact associated with this processor. A holistic lifecycle assessment approach is essential for making informed decisions about hardware choices and maximizing the sustainable value of existing computing resources. The key is to match the technology to the task and prioritize extending the life of existing hardware whenever feasible.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4790 ?

You’re interested in how the i7-4790 can be used sustainably in industrial settings. Here are some potential applications:

  • Legacy Systems: Many industrial facilities rely on older equipment that may require specific hardware or software compatible with the i7-4790. Keeping these systems running with existing hardware avoids the need for costly and resource-intensive upgrades, contributing to sustainability.
  • Control Systems: In some industrial control applications where real-time performance isn’t extremely demanding, the i7-4790 might be sufficient. This allows for continued use of existing systems, reducing the need for new hardware.
  • Data Acquisition and Monitoring: For tasks like collecting and monitoring data from sensors or machinery, the i7-4790 could be suitable. These applications often don’t require the latest processing power, making older systems with this processor a viable option.
  • Human-Machine Interface (HMI): In some industrial settings, HMIs used for interacting with machinery may not need high-end processors. An i7-4790 system could be sufficient for these applications, extending the life of existing hardware.
  • Testing and Simulation: For certain testing or simulation tasks in industrial environments, the i7-4790 might provide enough processing power. This allows for continued use of older systems, reducing the need for new, more resource-intensive hardware.

Important Considerations:

  • Reliability: Industrial environments often demand high reliability. While the i7-4790 is a mature and stable processor, it’s crucial to ensure that systems using it are properly maintained and monitored to minimize downtime.
  • Security: Security is paramount in industrial settings. Older systems might have vulnerabilities. It’s essential to implement appropriate security measures to protect against potential threats.
  • Efficiency: While extending the life of existing hardware is sustainable, it’s also important to consider the overall energy efficiency of the system. If the i7-4790 system is significantly less energy-efficient than a newer alternative for the specific task, it might be more sustainable in the long run to upgrade.

Overall:

The i7-4790 can still find sustainable applications in industrial settings, particularly when it comes to legacy systems, control systems, data acquisition, HMIs, and certain testing scenarios. However, it’s crucial to balance the benefits of extending hardware life with considerations for reliability, security, and overall energy efficiency.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4790 ?

While the i7-4790 is an older processor, research and development can still be done to maximize its sustainable use. Here are some potential areas:

1. Optimizing Performance and Power Efficiency:

  • Software Optimization: Research can focus on developing software or tools that optimize the performance of i7-4790 systems for specific tasks, reducing unnecessary processing and energy consumption.
  • Operating System Tweaks: Exploring ways to fine-tune operating systems to better utilize the i7-4790’s architecture and minimize power usage could be a valuable area of research.
  • Virtualization and Containerization: Investigating the use of virtualization or containerization technologies on i7-4790 systems could potentially improve resource utilization and energy efficiency.

2. Extending Lifespan and Reuse:

  • Refurbishment Techniques: Research into improving refurbishment processes for older computers, including those with i7-4790s, could increase the number of systems that can be reused.
  • Component Recovery and Reuse: Developing methods for efficiently recovering and reusing components from i7-4790 systems could reduce e-waste and the need for new manufacturing.
  • Developing New Applications: Exploring new applications or use cases for i7-4790 systems could extend their lifespan and prevent them from becoming obsolete.

3. E-waste Management and Recycling:

  • Improved Recycling Processes: Research into more efficient and environmentally friendly recycling methods for materials found in i7-4790 systems could minimize the impact of e-waste.
  • Material Recovery: Investigating ways to recover valuable materials from i7-4790 systems for reuse in new products could contribute to a circular economy.
  • E-waste Reduction Strategies: Research could focus on developing strategies to reduce e-waste associated with older computer systems, including those with i7-4790s.

4. Lifecycle Assessment and Analysis:

  • LCA Studies: Conducting lifecycle assessment studies on i7-4790 systems can provide valuable data on their environmental impact and identify areas for improvement.
  • Comparative Analysis: Research comparing the environmental impact of using i7-4790 systems versus upgrading to newer systems could help inform decision-making about hardware choices.

5. Education and Awareness:

  • Sustainable Computing Practices: Research into effective ways to educate users about sustainable computing practices, including extending the life of older hardware, could have a significant impact.
  • Promoting Reuse and Recycling: Developing campaigns or programs to promote the reuse and recycling of older computer systems could help reduce e-waste.

Important Note:

While research and development can help maximize the sustainable use of i7-4790 systems, it’s crucial to acknowledge that newer processors generally offer better energy efficiency for the same task. When considering new hardware purchases, prioritize energy-efficient options to minimize your environmental footprint.

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

Reference

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
  53. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
  77. ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
  96. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
  107. ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

Recommended HashTags

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »