Sustainable technology of 4760

79 / 100

Sustainable technology of 4760 ?

It seems like you might be asking about sustainable technology in the context of the year 4760. However, it’s difficult to predict what technology will be like that far into the future.

Sustainable technology is a broad field that encompasses a variety of practices and innovations. Some examples include:

Renewable energy sources: Solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal power are all examples of renewable energy sources that can help reduce our reliance on fossil fuels.
Energy efficiency: Technologies that help us use less energy, such as LED lighting and smart thermostats, can also help reduce our environmental impact.
Sustainable agriculture: Practices that help us grow food in a way that is environmentally responsible, such as crop rotation and no-till farming, can help protect our soil and water resources.
Waste reduction: Technologies that help us reduce waste, such as recycling and composting, can help conserve resources and reduce pollution.

It’s likely that sustainable technology in 4760 will be even more advanced and integrated into our lives than it is today. It’s possible that we will have developed new ways to generate and store renewable energy, or that we will have found ways to make our transportation systems more sustainable. It’s also possible that we will have made significant progress in reducing waste and pollution.

Ultimately, the future of sustainable technology is uncertain. However, it’s clear that it will play a critical role in helping us create a more sustainable world.

What is Sustainable technology of 4760 ?

Unfortunately, it’s impossible to know what sustainable technology will look like in 4760. That’s over 2,700 years in the future! Technology evolves at an incredibly rapid pace, and it’s difficult to predict even a few decades out, let alone millennia.

However, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and the ongoing pursuit of sustainability:

Highly Advanced Renewable Energy: It’s likely that by 4760, renewable energy sources will be incredibly advanced and efficient. We might see things like space-based solar power, fusion reactors, or even energy sources we can’t even imagine today.
Closed-Loop Systems: Technologies that create closed-loop systems for resource use will likely be highly developed. This means minimizing waste, reusing materials, and creating systems that mimic natural cycles.
Biomimicry: We might see a greater emphasis on biomimicry, where technology is designed to mimic natural processes and systems. This could lead to innovations in materials science, energy production, and even architecture.
Localized and Decentralized Systems: Sustainable technology in 4760 might favor localized and decentralized systems. This could mean smaller-scale energy grids, local food production, and communities that are more self-sufficient.
Artificial Intelligence and Automation: AI and automation will likely play a significant role in optimizing resource use and minimizing environmental impact. We might see AI-powered systems that manage energy grids, control transportation, and even monitor ecosystems.

Of course, this is just speculation. The reality of sustainable technology in 4760 could be far more surprising and innovative than anything we can imagine today.

It’s important to remember that the development of sustainable technology is an ongoing process. By continuing to innovate and prioritize sustainability, we can help ensure a healthy planet for future generations, even those living in 4760.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4760 ?

It’s more accurate to say that sustainable technology in 4760 would be essential for everyone. Here’s why:

Resource Scarcity: Even with advanced technology, it’s likely that Earth’s resources will be more limited in the future. Sustainable technology would be crucial for managing those resources efficiently and ensuring everyone has access to what they need.
Environmental Challenges: Climate change and other environmental issues are likely to persist, even with progress. Sustainable technology would be vital for mitigating these challenges and adapting to their effects.
Societal Well-being: Sustainable technology wouldn’t just be about survival. It would also be about creating a high quality of life for everyone, with access to clean energy, healthy food, and comfortable living conditions.

However, some groups might have a particularly strong need for sustainable technology:

Vulnerable Populations: Communities in harsh environments or those already facing resource scarcity would rely heavily on sustainable solutions for survival and resilience.
Developing Regions: Sustainable technology could help these regions leapfrog traditional, polluting development models and build sustainable infrastructure from the start.

Ultimately, sustainable technology in 4760 would be a necessity for all of humanity, playing a critical role in ensuring a just and thriving future for everyone.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4760 ?

This is a fascinating question that requires us to think about the long-term future! While we can’t pinpoint an exact date, we can explore the increasing urgency of sustainable technology as we approach 4760.

Here’s how we can think about it:

Now and in the near future: We need sustainable technology now. The environmental challenges we face today, like climate change and resource depletion, demand immediate action. The sooner we develop and implement sustainable solutions, the better the chances for a healthy planet in the long run.
The coming centuries: As we move closer to 4760, the need for sustainable technology will only become more critical. It’s likely that environmental problems will worsen, and resources may become scarcer. Each generation will need to build upon the sustainable technologies of the past, creating even more advanced solutions.
The world of 4760: By 4760, sustainable technology will likely be absolutely essential for human survival and well-being. It will be the foundation of society, integrated into every aspect of life.

It’s not about a specific date in 4760, but rather about a continuous process:

The need for sustainable technology is not a one-time event. It’s an ongoing journey that starts now and continues indefinitely. Every year that passes without significant progress makes the challenges of the future even greater.

Therefore, the answer to “when is it required?” is: Always, with increasing urgency as we approach 4760.

We need to be working on sustainable technology today, tomorrow, and every day until we reach a point where we can confidently say that humanity has a secure and thriving future on Earth.

COURTESY :Sustain Life (now part of Workiva)

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4760 ?

That’s a great question that gets us thinking about the scope of sustainable technology in the far future! Here’s how we can consider “where” sustainable technology will be required in 4760:

Everywhere on Earth: It’s highly likely that sustainable technology will be necessary in every corner of the globe. From bustling cities to remote villages, people will need access to clean energy, sustainable food production, and resource management systems.
Beyond Earth: By 4760, humanity might have established settlements beyond Earth. Sustainable technology would be even more critical in these locations, as they would likely face unique challenges in terms of resource availability and environmental conditions.
In all aspects of life: Sustainable technology won’t be confined to specific sectors. It will be integrated into every facet of daily life, including:
- Homes and buildings: Energy-efficient housing, smart grids, and waste management systems.
- Transportation: Sustainable transportation systems, potentially including advanced forms of travel we can’t imagine today.
- Food production: Sustainable agriculture, vertical farms, and lab-grown food.
- Manufacturing: Closed-loop systems, resource efficiency, and minimal waste.
- Communication and technology: Energy-efficient devices, sustainable data centers, and responsible use of resources.

Essentially, sustainable technology in 4760 will be woven into the fabric of society, supporting human civilization wherever it exists and in whatever form it takes.

It’s exciting to imagine how these technologies might evolve and shape the future!

How is required Sustainable technology of 4760 ?

This is where it gets really interesting! How sustainable technology is required in 4760 depends heavily on the specific challenges and conditions of that era. However, we can explore some potential approaches based on current trends and future possibilities:

1. Continuous Innovation and Adaptation:

Ongoing Research and Development: Sustainable technology in 4760 will be the result of centuries of research and development. It will require a continuous pursuit of new ideas, materials, and processes.
Adaptability: The ability to adapt to changing environmental conditions and resource availability will be crucial. Technologies will need to be flexible and resilient in the face of unforeseen challenges.

2. Integration and System Thinking:

Holistic Approach: Sustainable technology won’t be about isolated solutions. It will require a holistic approach, where different technologies are integrated to create synergistic systems.
Circular Economy: The concept of a circular economy, where resources are reused and waste is minimized, will likely be a central principle. Technologies will need to be designed with this in mind.

3. Advanced Technologies and Techniques:

Biotechnology: Advances in biotechnology could lead to the development of new materials, energy sources, and even ways to remediate environmental damage.
Nanotechnology: Nanotechnology might enable the creation of incredibly efficient materials and devices, with applications in energy storage, water purification, and more.
Artificial Intelligence: AI could play a crucial role in optimizing resource use, managing complex systems, and even predicting and preventing environmental problems.

4. Social and Ethical Considerations:

Equity and Accessibility: Sustainable technology in 4760 must be accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status.
Ethical Development: Ethical considerations will be paramount. Technologies will need to be developed and used in a way that respects human rights, protects the environment, and promotes social well-being.

Ultimately, how sustainable technology is required in 4760 will depend on the choices we make today. By investing in research, promoting innovation, and prioritizing sustainability, we can pave the way for a future where humanity and the planet thrive together.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4760 ?

It’s tough to create a specific case study for sustainable technology in 4760, as that’s so far in the future! But, we can build a hypothetical scenario based on current trends and extrapolate to imagine what such a case study might entail.

Hypothetical Case Study: The “Great Restoration” of the Amazon Rainforest, 4760

Background: By the mid-48th century, climate change impacts have been largely mitigated thanks to centuries of sustainable technology development. However, the Amazon rainforest, once a vital ecosystem, has suffered severe degradation due to past deforestation and climate shifts.

Challenge: The “Great Restoration” project aims to revitalize the Amazon, restoring its biodiversity, hydrological cycles, and carbon sequestration capacity. This requires a multi-faceted approach involving:

Advanced Ecological Engineering: Deploying nanobots and AI-powered drones to analyze soil composition, plant health, and water flow, then precisely deliver nutrients, seeds, and even create artificial “rain” where needed.
Biotechnology for Resilience: Genetically engineering native plant species to be more resistant to drought, pests, and disease, ensuring long-term survival in the changing climate.
Symbiotic Systems: Creating artificial “symbiotic” ecosystems where different species of plants, insects, and microorganisms support each other, mimicking the complex interactions of a healthy rainforest.
Community Involvement: Engaging indigenous communities and local populations in the restoration efforts, leveraging their traditional knowledge and creating sustainable economic opportunities tied to the rainforest’s health.

Outcome: The “Great Restoration” is a resounding success. The Amazon regains its vibrant biodiversity, becomes a crucial carbon sink, and supports thriving communities. The project serves as a model for ecological restoration efforts worldwide, demonstrating the power of sustainable technology to heal and protect the planet.

Key Sustainable Technologies Featured:

Nanotechnology: For precise delivery of resources and environmental monitoring.
Biotechnology: For enhancing plant resilience and creating symbiotic ecosystems.
Artificial Intelligence: For analyzing data, optimizing restoration strategies, and managing complex systems.
Renewable Energy: Powering all aspects of the project, from drone operations to data centers.

Lessons Learned:

Long-term vision: Sustainable technology requires a long-term perspective, with solutions designed to last for centuries.
Interconnectedness: Recognizing the interconnectedness of ecosystems and the need for holistic solutions.
Collaboration: Emphasizing the importance of collaboration between scientists, engineers, and communities.

This hypothetical case study illustrates how sustainable technology in 4760 might be applied to address complex environmental challenges, highlighting the importance of innovation, integration, and a long-term vision.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4760 ?

White Paper: Envisioning Sustainable Technology in 4760

Abstract:

Predicting the specifics of technology over 2,700 years into the future is inherently speculative. However, by examining current trends, extrapolating potential advancements, and considering the enduring challenges facing humanity, we can construct a plausible vision of sustainable technology in 4760. This white paper explores potential technological domains, societal implications, and the crucial role of continuous innovation in achieving a truly sustainable future.

1. Introduction:

The pursuit of sustainability is a continuous journey. While current efforts focus on mitigating climate change and resource depletion, the long-term vision extends centuries into the future. This paper explores a hypothetical landscape of sustainable technology in 4760, acknowledging the inherent uncertainties while highlighting potential pathways and crucial considerations.

2. Technological Domains:

Advanced Energy Systems: Fusion power, space-based solar energy, and potentially undiscovered energy sources will likely be commonplace. Energy harvesting from ambient sources (vibrations, thermal gradients) may power localized systems. Energy storage will be highly efficient, possibly utilizing advanced materials and quantum technologies.
Closed-Loop Resource Management: Resource scarcity will necessitate highly efficient closed-loop systems. Manufacturing will rely heavily on recycled and repurposed materials. Advanced material science, including self-healing and biodegradable materials, will minimize waste.
Biotechnology and Biomimicry: Biotechnology will play a critical role in agriculture, medicine, and manufacturing. Biomimicry, designing systems inspired by nature, will be prevalent, leading to innovations in materials, energy production, and even architecture.
Artificial Intelligence and Automation: AI will be integral to optimizing resource use, managing complex systems, and adapting to changing environmental conditions. Automated systems will likely manage infrastructure, transportation, and even resource distribution.
Localized and Decentralized Systems: Decentralized energy grids, localized food production (vertical farms, advanced hydroponics), and community-based resource management will increase resilience and reduce reliance on large-scale, centralized systems.
Space-Based Technologies: Space-based solar power, resource extraction from asteroids, and potentially even off-world settlements will necessitate advanced space technologies and sustainable resource management beyond Earth.

3. Societal Implications:

Resource Equity: Sustainable technology in 4760 must ensure equitable access to resources for all of humanity, regardless of location or socioeconomic status.
Environmental Stewardship: A deep understanding of ecological systems and a commitment to environmental stewardship will be essential. Technology will be used to monitor, protect, and restore ecosystems.
Ethical Considerations: The development and deployment of advanced technologies will require careful ethical considerations, particularly regarding AI, biotechnology, and potential impacts on human society.
Global Cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity will require unprecedented levels of international cooperation and shared knowledge.

4. The Role of Continuous Innovation:

The sustainable technology of 4760 will be the result of centuries of continuous innovation. Investing in research and development, fostering collaboration, and embracing new ideas will be crucial for achieving a sustainable future.

5. Conclusion:

While predicting the future is challenging, envisioning sustainable technology in 4760 allows us to explore potential pathways and consider the crucial choices we must make today. By prioritizing sustainability, investing in innovation, and fostering global cooperation, we can pave the way for a future where humanity and the planet thrive together. This vision should not be seen as a fixed prediction, but rather as a guide, inspiring and motivating present-day decisions towards a more sustainable tomorrow.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4760 ?

It’s fascinating to imagine the industrial applications of sustainable technology in 4760! Here are some possibilities, extrapolated from current trends and potential advancements:

1. Advanced Manufacturing and Resource Management:

Closed-loop Production Systems: Factories will likely operate on closed-loop principles, where resources are continuously recycled and reused. Waste will be virtually eliminated, and manufacturing processes will mimic natural ecosystems.
On-Demand Production and Customization: Advanced 3D printing and nanotechnology could enable on-demand manufacturing of highly customized products, minimizing waste and optimizing resource use.
Self-Healing Materials: Industries may utilize self-healing materials that can repair themselves, extending the lifespan of products and infrastructure, and reducing the need for replacements.

2. Energy-Intensive Industries:

Carbon-Neutral Production: Industries like steel manufacturing and cement production, which are currently energy-intensive and contribute significantly to carbon emissions, will likely have achieved carbon neutrality through the use of renewable energy sources and carbon capture technologies.
Advanced Energy Storage: Industries will have access to highly efficient energy storage solutions, allowing them to utilize renewable energy sources reliably and power their operations even when sunlight or wind is unavailable.

3. Resource Extraction and Processing:

Sustainable Mining: Mining operations will likely be highly automated and utilize techniques that minimize environmental impact, such as in-situ leaching and bioremediation.
Asteroid Mining: Access to resources from asteroids will reduce reliance on Earth’s finite resources, but will need to be conducted sustainably with minimal impact on space environments.

4. Infrastructure and Construction:

Smart Infrastructure: Cities will be equipped with smart infrastructure systems that optimize energy use, manage resources efficiently, and adapt to changing conditions.
Sustainable Building Materials: Buildings will be constructed using sustainable, locally sourced materials, and will be designed to generate their own energy and manage their own waste.

5. Agriculture and Food Production:

Vertical Farms and Controlled Environment Agriculture: Urban centers may have large-scale vertical farms and controlled environment agriculture facilities that produce food efficiently with minimal land and water use.
Precision Agriculture: Advanced technologies like AI and robotics will enable precision agriculture, optimizing crop yields while minimizing resource inputs and environmental impact.

6. Transportation and Logistics:

Sustainable Transportation Systems: Industries will rely on sustainable transportation systems powered by renewable energy, potentially including advanced forms of transportation we can’t even imagine today.
Automated Logistics: AI-powered logistics systems will optimize supply chains, reduce waste, and minimize the environmental impact of transportation.

Overall, industrial applications of sustainable technology in 4760 will be characterized by:

Resource efficiency: Minimizing waste and maximizing the use of resources.
Renewable energy: Reliance on clean and sustainable energy sources.
Technological integration: Combining different technologies to create synergistic systems.
Environmental responsibility: Prioritizing the protection and restoration of ecosystems.

It’s important to remember that these are just potential scenarios. The actual industrial applications of sustainable technology in 4760 could be even more surprising and transformative than anything we can imagine today.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4760 ?

It’s exciting to think about the research and development that would be necessary to achieve sustainable technology in 4760! Here are some key areas that would likely be the focus of intense investigation over the coming centuries:

1. Fundamental Science and Materials:

New Energy Sources: Research into fusion energy, exotic forms of energy, and potentially even harnessing zero-point energy would be crucial.
Advanced Materials: Developing new materials with exceptional properties, such as superconductivity at room temperature, self-healing capabilities, and biodegradability, would be essential.
Understanding Complex Systems: Gaining a deeper understanding of complex systems like climate, ecosystems, and even human societies would be vital for developing sustainable solutions.

2. Biotechnology and Biomimicry:

Synthetic Biology: Engineering biological systems to perform specific functions, such as producing biofuels, creating new materials, or even cleaning up pollution.
Biomimetic Design: Studying natural systems to inspire the design of new technologies, such as energy-efficient devices, self-healing materials, and sustainable agricultural practices.
Genetic Engineering: Developing techniques for safely and ethically modifying organisms to enhance their resilience, productivity, or ability to perform desired functions.

3. Artificial Intelligence and Computation:

Advanced AI: Developing AI systems that can learn, adapt, and solve complex problems with minimal human intervention.
Quantum Computing: Exploring the potential of quantum computing to revolutionize fields like materials science, medicine, and AI.
Neuromorphic Computing: Designing computers that mimic the structure and function of the human brain, potentially leading to more energy-efficient and adaptable AI systems.

4. Space-Based Technologies:

Space-Based Solar Power: Developing technologies for capturing solar energy in space and transmitting it to Earth.
Asteroid Mining: Researching methods for sustainably extracting resources from asteroids and other celestial bodies.
Space Habitats: Designing and building sustainable habitats for long-term human presence in space.

5. Social and Ethical Dimensions:

Sustainable Development Pathways: Studying different pathways to achieve sustainability, considering social, economic, and environmental factors.
Ethical Frameworks: Developing ethical frameworks for guiding the development and use of advanced technologies, particularly in areas like AI and biotechnology.
Global Cooperation: Researching ways to foster international cooperation and knowledge sharing to address global challenges like climate change and resource scarcity.

It’s important to remember that:

Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Research and development in these areas would require collaboration between scientists, engineers, and experts from various disciplines.
Long-Term Vision: Achieving sustainable technology in 4760 would require a long-term perspective, with research efforts spanning centuries.
Ethical Considerations: Ethical considerations would need to be integrated into all stages of research and development.

By investing in these areas of research and development, we can lay the foundation for a future where humanity and the planet thrive together.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.