Sustainable technology of 4750

79 / 100

Sustainable technology of 4750 ?

It seems like you’re asking about sustainable technology in the year 4750. That’s quite a long time in the future!

It’s difficult to predict exactly what technology will be like that far into the future, but we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and the principles of sustainability.

Here are some possibilities for sustainable technology in 4750:

Closed-loop systems: By 4750, we might have perfected closed-loop systems for resource use. This means that resources are continuously recycled and reused, minimizing waste and the need for new resource extraction.
Advanced renewable energy: We can expect significant advancements in renewable energy technologies like solar, wind, and geothermal. Perhaps we’ll even have new forms of energy generation that we can’t even imagine today.
Biotechnology and biomimicry: Technology might be heavily inspired by nature, with advancements in biotechnology allowing us to create materials and processes that are both sustainable and highly efficient.
Localized production: To reduce transportation costs and environmental impact, production might be highly localized, with advanced manufacturing technologies allowing for on-demand creation of goods.
Artificial intelligence and automation: AI and automation could play a key role in optimizing resource use and minimizing waste in all aspects of life, from agriculture to manufacturing to transportation.

Of course, this is just speculation. The actual sustainable technologies of 4750 could be very different. But one thing is certain: sustainability will be a critical factor in the development of any technology in the future.

Do you have any other questions about sustainable technology or the future?

What is Sustainable technology of 4750 ?

Predicting the exact nature of sustainable technology in 4750 is a fun thought experiment, but it’s ultimately impossible to say for sure. However, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and the fundamental principles of sustainability. Here are some possibilities:

Closed-loop resource systems: Imagine a world where resources are continuously recycled and reused, minimizing waste and the need for new extraction. This could involve advanced material science, nanotechnology, and sophisticated recycling processes.
Advanced renewable energy: We can expect significant advancements in solar, wind, geothermal, and perhaps even new forms of energy generation that we can’t even imagine today. Energy might be harvested from space, the oceans, or even directly from the Earth’s core.
Biotechnology and biomimicry: Technology might be heavily inspired by nature, with advancements in biotechnology allowing us to create materials and processes that are both sustainable and highly efficient. We might see self-healing materials, biodegradable electronics, and energy-efficient systems modeled after biological processes.
Localized and on-demand production: To reduce transportation costs and environmental impact, production might be highly localized, with advanced manufacturing technologies allowing for on-demand creation of goods. This could involve 3D printing, nanotechnology, and the use of locally sourced materials.
Artificial intelligence and automation: AI and automation could play a key role in optimizing resource use and minimizing waste in all aspects of life, from agriculture to manufacturing to transportation. AI could manage energy grids, optimize transportation routes, and even design new sustainable technologies.

Do you have any other questions about sustainable technology or the future?

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4750 ?

In the year 4750, the need for sustainable technology would be absolutely critical for the survival and well-being of society. Here’s who would be most reliant on it:

Everyone: By 4750, sustainable technology would likely be so deeply integrated into daily life that everyone would rely on it for basic needs like food, water, shelter, energy, and transportation.
Future generations: The very existence of future generations would depend on the responsible use of resources and the preservation of a healthy planet. Sustainable technology would be essential for ensuring a habitable world for those who come after us.
Ecosystems: Sustainable technology would play a vital role in maintaining the health and balance of ecosystems. It would be crucial for protecting biodiversity, preventing pollution, and mitigating the effects of climate change.
Vulnerable populations: Those most vulnerable to environmental changes and resource scarcity would rely heavily on sustainable technology for resilience and survival. This could include communities in extreme climates, those with limited access to resources, and those displaced by environmental disasters.

Essentially, by 4750, sustainable technology would be less of an option and more of a necessity for all life on Earth. It would be the foundation upon which society functions and the key to a thriving and equitable future.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4750 ?

This is a really interesting question! It’s not just about what sustainable technology will be like in 4750, but when it will be needed.

The answer is: long before 4750.

Here’s why:

Urgency of current challenges: We’re already facing significant environmental challenges like climate change, resource depletion, and pollution. These problems require urgent action, not solutions centuries in the future.
Evolutionary process: Sustainable technology won’t just appear fully formed in 4750. It will evolve over time, with each generation building upon the innovations of the last. The groundwork for the sustainable technologies of 4750 needs to be laid now.
Long-term vision: While 4750 might seem far off, thinking about that distant future helps us make better decisions today. It encourages us to prioritize long-term sustainability over short-term gains, and to invest in research and development that will benefit future generations.

So, while we might imagine incredibly advanced sustainable technology in 4750, the need for it is immediate. The work to create that future starts now, with every step we take towards a more sustainable world.

COURTESY : TURILYTIX

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4750 ?

That’s a great question that really gets you thinking about the scope of sustainable technology! Here’s how we can think about “where” sustainable technology would be required in 4750:

Everywhere on Earth: By 4750, sustainable technology would likely be essential in every corner of the globe, from the deepest oceans to the highest mountains, and everything in between. It would be necessary for:
- Urban centers: Sustainable cities with efficient resource management, clean energy, and minimal pollution.
- Rural areas: Sustainable agriculture, off-grid energy solutions, and preservation of natural resources.
- Extreme environments: Technologies that allow humans to thrive in harsh climates while minimizing environmental impact.
Beyond Earth: It’s possible that by 4750, humanity will have expanded beyond Earth. Sustainable technology would be crucial for:
- Space habitats: Closed-loop life support systems, resource extraction from celestial bodies, and sustainable energy generation.
- Other planets: If we colonize other planets, sustainable technology would be essential for creating habitable environments and ensuring long-term survival.
In every aspect of life: Sustainable technology wouldn’t be confined to specific sectors. It would be integrated into:
- Homes: Smart homes with energy-efficient appliances, water recycling systems, and personalized environmental controls.
- Workplaces: Sustainable offices and factories with minimal waste, renewable energy, and ethical resource use.
- Transportation: Sustainable transportation systems powered by clean energy, with minimal emissions and efficient use of resources.
- Communication: Sustainable communication networks with minimal energy consumption and responsible use of resources.

In essence, by 4750, sustainable technology would be the foundation upon which all human activity is built, both on Earth and potentially beyond. It would be the key to ensuring a thriving and equitable future for all.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4750 ?

That’s a fantastic question! It really gets to the heart of how sustainable technology will be integrated into society in 4750. Here are some key aspects of how it might be required:

By design: Sustainable principles would likely be embedded into the very design of all technologies. This means that from the initial concept to the materials used and the manufacturing process, sustainability would be a core consideration.
Through regulation: Strict regulations and standards would likely be in place to ensure that all technologies meet sustainability criteria. This could involve limits on resource consumption, emissions, and waste generation.
Through economic incentives: Governments might use economic incentives like tax breaks, subsidies, and carbon pricing to encourage the development and adoption of sustainable technologies.
Through social norms: By 4750, sustainability would likely be deeply ingrained in social norms and values. Consumers might actively choose sustainable products and services, and companies might compete on their sustainability credentials.
Through education: Education systems would likely play a crucial role in fostering a deep understanding of sustainability and the importance of responsible technology use. This would ensure that future generations are equipped to develop and use sustainable technologies.
Through global cooperation: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource depletion would require international cooperation and the sharing of sustainable technologies across borders.

In essence, by 4750, sustainable technology would be required not just by law, but by design, by economics, by social pressure, and by a deep understanding of its importance for the well-being of humanity and the planet. It would be an intrinsic part of how society functions.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4750 ?

It’s impossible to provide a real case study of sustainable technology in 4750, as that’s far in the future. However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on current trends and principles of sustainability to illustrate what such a technology might look like.

Hypothetical Case Study: The Global Atmospheric Regeneration Network (GARN)

Context: By 4750, climate change, even with centuries of mitigation efforts, has left some lasting impacts. Maintaining a stable and breathable atmosphere is a global priority. The GARN is a network of interconnected technologies designed to actively manage and regenerate the Earth’s atmosphere.

Technology: GARN consists of several integrated components:

Atmospheric Capture and Conversion Units (ACCUs): These units, located strategically around the globe, capture excess greenhouse gases (like methane and CO2) and pollutants from the atmosphere. Using advanced nanotechnology and bio-engineered catalysts, these gases are converted into stable, usable materials – perhaps carbon nanotubes for construction, or even biofuels.
Bio-Integrated Air Purifiers (BAPs): Vast, bio-engineered forests and algae farms act as natural air purifiers. BAPs are genetically modified to be hyper-efficient at absorbing CO2 and releasing oxygen. They are integrated into urban and rural landscapes, creating a living, breathing network of air purification.
Stratospheric Aerosol Injection System (SAIS) – Controlled: Unlike earlier, less precise attempts at geoengineering, the 4750 SAIS is a highly controlled system. It releases carefully selected, naturally occurring aerosols into the stratosphere to reflect sunlight and manage global temperatures. Crucially, this is done with a deep understanding of atmospheric chemistry and minimal side effects.
Global Monitoring and Control Network (GMCN): A sophisticated network of sensors and AI systems constantly monitors atmospheric conditions – temperature, composition, pollution levels, etc. The GMCN uses this data to optimize the operation of ACCUs, BAPs, and SAIS, ensuring a stable and healthy atmosphere.

Sustainability Aspects:

Closed-loop system: GARN aims to create a closed-loop system for atmospheric gases, converting pollutants into usable resources.
Renewable energy powered: The entire network is powered by advanced renewable energy sources, minimizing its carbon footprint.
Biomimicry: BAPs leverage the power of nature, enhancing natural processes for air purification.
Precision and control: The GMCN allows for precise management of the atmosphere, minimizing unintended consequences.

Impact:

Stable atmosphere: GARN helps maintain a stable and breathable atmosphere, mitigating the impacts of past climate change.
Resource creation: Converted greenhouse gases provide valuable resources for other industries.
Ecosystem health: Cleaner air and a stable climate contribute to the health and resilience of ecosystems.

Challenges (even in 4750!):

Maintaining the complexity: A global network like GARN requires constant maintenance and adaptation to changing conditions.
Unforeseen consequences: Even with advanced technology, there’s always the potential for unintended side effects.
Global cooperation: Managing the atmosphere requires unprecedented levels of international cooperation and agreement.

This hypothetical case study illustrates how sustainable technology in 4750 might be highly advanced, integrated, and focused on addressing global challenges. It also highlights the importance of considering sustainability in all aspects of technology development, from design to implementation.

COURTESY: SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4750 ?

White Paper: Envisioning Sustainable Technology in 4750

Abstract:

Predicting the precise nature of technology centuries into the future is inherently speculative. However, by extrapolating current trends, understanding fundamental principles of sustainability, and engaging in thought experiments, we can envision potential pathways for sustainable technology in 4750. This white paper explores potential characteristics, applications, and societal implications of such advanced technologies, emphasizing the crucial role they will play in ensuring a thriving future for humanity and the planet.

1. Introduction:

The year 4750 represents a distant horizon, yet contemplating it allows us to consider the long-term consequences of our current technological choices. Sustainability, the ability to meet present needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own, will be paramount in shaping the technologies of that era. This paper explores potential advancements in sustainable technology, acknowledging the inherent uncertainties while aiming to stimulate discussion and inspire innovation.

2. Core Principles:

Sustainable technology in 4750 will likely be built upon several core principles:

Closed-Loop Systems: Resource scarcity will necessitate the near-total elimination of waste. Advanced material science, nanotechnology, and sophisticated recycling processes will enable closed-loop systems where resources are continuously reused and repurposed.
Renewable Energy Dominance: Fossil fuels will be a relic of the past. A diverse portfolio of advanced renewable energy technologies, potentially including space-based solar power, geothermal energy harvested from the Earth’s core, and novel energy generation methods, will power civilization.
Biomimicry and Bio-Integration: Nature will serve as a blueprint for technological innovation. Biomimicry, the imitation of natural processes and structures, will lead to the development of highly efficient and sustainable materials, processes, and systems. Bio-integrated technologies will seamlessly merge with biological systems, enhancing human capabilities and restoring ecological balance.
Localized and On-Demand Production: Globalized supply chains will be replaced by localized and on-demand production. Advanced manufacturing technologies like 4D printing, nanotechnology, and programmable matter will enable the creation of goods using locally sourced materials, minimizing transportation costs and environmental impact.
Artificial Intelligence and Automation: AI and automation will play a crucial role in optimizing resource utilization and minimizing waste across all sectors. AI-powered systems will manage energy grids, optimize transportation networks, and even design new sustainable technologies.

3. Potential Technological Advancements:

Atmospheric Regeneration Technologies: Advanced systems will actively manage and regenerate the Earth’s atmosphere, removing pollutants and greenhouse gases while maintaining a stable climate.
Oceanic Ecosystem Restoration: Nanotechnology and bio-engineered organisms will be deployed to restore damaged marine ecosystems, revitalize fisheries, and sequester carbon.
Personalized and Precision Agriculture: Vertical farms, hydroponics, and advanced sensor technologies will enable highly efficient and localized food production, minimizing land use and resource consumption.
Advanced Materials Science: Self-healing materials, biodegradable plastics, and super-efficient energy storage devices will revolutionize various industries.
Human Augmentation and Enhancement: Bio-integrated technologies will enhance human capabilities, potentially including increased longevity, enhanced cognitive function, and improved physical abilities.

4. Societal Implications:

The widespread adoption of sustainable technology in 4750 will have profound societal implications:

Resource Abundance: Closed-loop systems and efficient resource management will alleviate resource scarcity, fostering greater economic and social equity.
Environmental Harmony: Advanced technologies will work in harmony with nature, restoring ecological balance and mitigating the impacts of past environmental damage.
Enhanced Quality of Life: Clean energy, healthy environments, and advanced medical technologies will contribute to a significantly improved quality of life for all.
Ethical Considerations: The development and deployment of advanced technologies, particularly those related to human augmentation, will raise complex ethical questions that society will need to address.

5. Conclusion:

While the specifics of sustainable technology in 4750 remain speculative, envisioning potential pathways allows us to consider the long-term implications of our current choices. By embracing the principles of sustainability and investing in research and development, we can pave the way for a future where technology serves as a powerful tool for creating a thriving and equitable world for generations to come. The journey towards 4750 begins now, with every step we take towards a more sustainable present.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4750 ?

That’s a fascinating area to explore! Imagining the industrial applications of sustainable technology in 4750 requires us to think about how entire industries might be transformed by advancements in areas like resource management, energy, and materials science. Here are some potential examples:

1. Closed-Loop Manufacturing:

Scenario: Imagine a factory that takes in raw materials and outputs finished products, with virtually no waste. This could be achieved through:
- Advanced recycling technologies: Materials are broken down to their basic components and reused endlessly.
- On-demand production: Products are manufactured only when needed, minimizing overproduction and waste.
- Programmable matter: Materials can be reconfigured to create different products, reducing the need for diverse raw materials.
Impact: This would revolutionize manufacturing, minimizing resource depletion and pollution.

2. Sustainable Energy Production:

Scenario: Industries are powered by clean and abundant energy sources, such as:
- Space-based solar power: Energy is harvested from the sun in space and beamed down to Earth.
- Geothermal energy: Deep geothermal plants tap into the Earth’s core for a continuous supply of clean energy.
- Advanced energy storage: Super-efficient batteries and other storage technologies ensure a stable energy supply, even from intermittent renewable sources.
Impact: This would eliminate reliance on fossil fuels, drastically reducing greenhouse gas emissions and climate change.

3. Bio-Integrated Industries:

Scenario: Industries leverage the power of biology to create sustainable products and processes:
- Bio-manufacturing: Microorganisms are used to produce materials, chemicals, and even fuels.
- Living materials: Materials are grown rather than manufactured, potentially with self-healing properties and biodegradability.
- Sustainable agriculture: Precision agriculture and vertical farms maximize food production while minimizing land use and environmental impact.
Impact: This would create a new generation of industries that are in harmony with nature.

4. Resource Extraction and Management:

Scenario: Even in 4750, some resource extraction might be necessary. But it would be done with extreme care and sustainability:
- Autonomous mining: AI-powered robots would extract resources with minimal environmental disruption.
- Resource regeneration: Technologies might exist to regenerate certain resources, such as rare earth minerals.
- Circular economy for resources: Extracted resources are used in closed-loop systems, ensuring they are never lost or wasted.
Impact: This would allow us to access necessary resources while minimizing environmental damage.

5. Infrastructure Development:

Scenario: Building and maintaining infrastructure would be done sustainably:
- Self-healing materials: Buildings and infrastructure repair themselves, reducing maintenance needs and extending lifespan.
- Modular construction: Buildings are constructed from modular components that can be easily reconfigured or recycled.
- Smart infrastructure: AI-powered systems optimize the use of infrastructure, reducing energy consumption and waste.
Impact: This would create more resilient and sustainable infrastructure, reducing environmental impact and costs.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology could transform industries in 4750. The possibilities are vast, and the actual technologies that emerge could be very different. But the core principles of sustainability – minimizing waste, using renewable resources, and working in harmony with nature – will undoubtedly be central to industrial development in that distant future.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4750 ?

It’s exciting to think about the research and development that would be necessary to achieve the level of sustainable technology we’ve been discussing for 4750! Here’s a breakdown of some key areas:

1. Fundamental Science:

Advanced Materials Science:
- Programmable Matter: Imagine materials that can be reconfigured at the molecular level to create different objects. This would revolutionize manufacturing and resource use.
- Self-Healing Materials: Materials that can repair themselves, extending their lifespan and reducing waste.
- Super-Efficient Energy Storage: New materials that can store vast amounts of energy with minimal loss, crucial for renewable energy integration.
Nanotechnology:
- Nanobots: Tiny robots that can perform tasks at the molecular level, such as cleaning up pollution, delivering medicine, or building materials.
- Nano-scale Manufacturing: Creating materials and devices with atomic precision, enabling new forms of manufacturing and technology.
Biotechnology:
- Synthetic Biology: Designing and building new biological systems, potentially for bio-manufacturing, environmental remediation, or even creating living materials.
- Genetic Engineering: Modifying organisms to enhance their capabilities, such as increasing crop yields or creating microorganisms that can break down pollutants.
Physics:
- New Energy Sources: Exploring and harnessing new forms of energy, such as zero-point energy or energy from other dimensions (if such things exist!).
- Advanced Propulsion Systems: Developing new ways to travel, potentially including faster-than-light travel, which would have huge implications for space exploration and resource access.

2. Engineering and Technology:

Closed-Loop Systems Engineering:
- Advanced Recycling Technologies: Developing processes to break down materials to their basic components and reuse them endlessly.
- Resource Regeneration: Finding ways to regenerate resources, such as rare earth minerals, from waste or other sources.
Renewable Energy Technologies:
- Space-Based Solar Power: Designing and building large-scale solar arrays in space to beam clean energy back to Earth.
- Advanced Geothermal: Tapping into the Earth’s core for a continuous supply of clean energy.
Bio-Integrated Technology:
- Bio-Manufacturing: Developing processes to use biological systems to create materials, chemicals, and other products.
- Living Materials: Growing materials with biological processes, potentially with self-healing properties and biodegradability.
AI and Automation:
- Advanced AI: Developing AI systems that can design new technologies, manage complex systems, and even make ethical decisions.
- Autonomous Systems: Creating robots and other automated systems that can perform tasks with minimal human intervention, crucial for resource extraction, manufacturing, and environmental management.

3. Social Sciences and Ethics:

Sustainability Studies:
- Understanding complex systems: Developing a deep understanding of how human societies and natural ecosystems interact, to guide sustainable development.
- Ethical frameworks: Creating ethical frameworks for the development and use of advanced technologies, especially those that could have profound social or environmental impacts.
Future Studies:
- Scenario planning: Developing scenarios for the future to anticipate potential challenges and opportunities related to sustainable technology.
- Long-term visioning: Creating a shared vision for a sustainable future to guide research and development efforts.

4. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

Convergence of disciplines: The research and development needed for sustainable technology in 4750 would require collaboration across many different disciplines, including science, engineering, social sciences, and the humanities.
Global collaboration: Addressing global challenges like climate change and resource depletion would require international cooperation and the sharing of knowledge and technologies.

It’s important to remember that this is just a glimpse into the kind of research and development that might be necessary. The actual path to sustainable technology in 4750 could be very different. But by focusing on fundamental science, engineering, and ethical considerations, we can begin to lay the groundwork for a more sustainable future.

COURTESY : Sustain Life (now part of Workiva)

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.