Sustainable technology of 4730

81 / 100

Sustainable technology of 4730 ?

Sustainable technology in 4730 would likely be highly advanced and integrated into all aspects of life. Here are some potential examples:

Energy: Fusion power would be the primary source of energy, providing clean and abundant power for all needs. Smart grids would optimize energy distribution and usage, minimizing waste.
Transportation: Flying cars and high-speed maglev trains would be commonplace, powered by clean energy sources. Self-driving vehicles would optimize traffic flow and reduce accidents.
Agriculture: Vertical farms and hydroponics would be used to grow food in urban areas, reducing transportation costs and environmental impact. Genetically modified crops would be more resilient and nutritious.
Manufacturing: 3D printing and nanotechnology would enable the creation of complex products on demand, reducing waste and the need for large factories.
Waste management: Advanced recycling technologies would recover valuable materials from waste, minimizing landfill use.
Healthcare: Nanobots would be used for targeted drug delivery and disease treatment. Artificial intelligence would assist in diagnosis and personalized medicine.

These are just a few examples, and the possibilities are endless. Sustainable technology in 4730 would likely be far more advanced and integrated than anything we can imagine today.

What is Sustainable technology of 4730 ?

Sustainable technology in 4730 would likely be highly advanced and integrated into all aspects of life. Here are some potential examples:

Energy: Fusion power would be the primary source of energy, providing clean and abundant power for all needs. Smart grids would optimize energy distribution and usage, minimizing waste.
Transportation: Flying cars and high-speed maglev trains would be commonplace, powered by clean energy sources. Self-driving vehicles would optimize traffic flow and reduce accidents.
Agriculture: Vertical farms and hydroponics would be used to grow food in urban areas, reducing transportation costs and environmental impact. Genetically modified crops would be more resilient and nutritious.
Manufacturing: 3D printing and nanotechnology would enable the creation of complex products on demand, reducing waste and the need for large factories.
Waste management: Advanced recycling technologies would recover valuable materials from waste, minimizing landfill use.
Healthcare: Nanobots would be used for targeted drug delivery and disease treatment. Artificial intelligence would assist in diagnosis and personalized medicine.

These are just a few examples, and the possibilities are endless. Sustainable technology in 4730 would likely be far more advanced and integrated than anything we can imagine today.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4730 ?

It’s interesting to think about who might “require” sustainable technology in 4730! Here’s a breakdown of the likely drivers:

Planetary Limits: By 4730, it’s highly probable that resource scarcity and the effects of climate change will be deeply felt, if not catastrophic. Sustainable technology would be absolutely essential for survival. It wouldn’t be a choice, but a necessity.
Global Governance: It’s conceivable that by 4730, a unified global government or federation might exist, with strict regulations mandating sustainable practices across all sectors. This would ensure resource management and prevent environmental collapse.
Societal Values: In a future where survival depends on it, sustainability would likely be deeply ingrained in societal values. People would demand and expect sustainable products and services, and companies that fail to provide them would be ostracized.
Technological Evolution: By 4730, technology itself might have evolved to a point where sustainability is inherently built-in. New materials, energy sources, and manufacturing processes could be so efficient and environmentally friendly that there’s no other option but to be sustainable.

In essence, by 4730, everyone would be “required” to embrace sustainable technology, not just by law or regulation, but by the very nature of their existence and the world around them.

It’s a fascinating thought experiment to consider how far technology and society might evolve in such a distant future!

When is required Sustainable technology of 4730 ?

That’s a great question that gets to the heart of why we talk about sustainable technology in the first place! It’s not just a nice idea, it’s about survival. Here’s when sustainable technology will be absolutely required by 4730:

Long Ago: In a way, the need for sustainable technology started long ago, with the very first uses of fire and tools. But the urgency has increased dramatically in recent centuries.
Now (and the near future): Right now, in 2025, we are in a critical period. We are already experiencing the effects of climate change and resource depletion. The need for sustainable technology is urgent and growing more critical every day.
The Coming Centuries: Over the next few centuries, the need for sustainable technology will only intensify. As resources dwindle and the effects of climate change worsen, societies will be forced to adopt sustainable practices or face collapse.
By 4730: By this distant future, it’s likely that the planet will be in a very different state. It’s possible that:
- Resources will be extremely scarce.
- The climate will be drastically altered.
- Humanity may have suffered significant population decline.
- Or even be facing extinction.

In this context, sustainable technology will not be a choice, but a fundamental requirement for survival. It will be the only way to:

Provide food and water.
Generate energy.
Maintain habitable environments.
And ensure the long-term survival of humanity.

Essentially, by 4730, the “when” for sustainable technology will have long passed. It will be an ongoing, continuous necessity for existence.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4730 ?

By 4730, sustainable technology will be required everywhere on Earth, and potentially even beyond. Here’s a breakdown:

Globally: The interconnectedness of Earth’s systems means that unsustainable practices in one region will impact others. Therefore, sustainable technology will be necessary in every country, continent, and ecosystem. Local solutions will likely be tailored to specific environments, but the overall need for sustainability will be universal.
Urban Centers: Cities, as centers of population and consumption, will be crucial areas for sustainable technology implementation. This includes sustainable energy, transportation, waste management, and food production within urban environments (e.g., vertical farms).
Rural Areas: Sustainable agriculture, resource management, and energy generation will be essential in rural areas to support both local populations and the overall global ecosystem.
Industrial Zones: Manufacturing and industry will need to operate on closed-loop systems, minimizing waste and maximizing resource efficiency. Sustainable energy sources and production methods will be mandatory.
Oceans and Waterways: Sustainable fishing practices, pollution control, and ecosystem restoration will be vital for maintaining the health of aquatic environments, which are crucial for food production and climate regulation.
Atmosphere: Technologies for carbon capture, air purification, and climate engineering (if necessary) might be required to maintain a breathable and stable atmosphere.
Even Beyond Earth: If humanity has expanded beyond Earth by 4730, sustainable practices will be even more critical in extraterrestrial settlements. Resource limitations in space will necessitate closed-loop systems for everything from life support to manufacturing.

In short, by 4730, sustainable technology won’t be confined to specific locations. It will be an absolute necessity for human survival and the health of the planet (and potentially beyond) – a fundamental requirement integrated into every aspect of life and civilization.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4730 ?

By 4730, sustainable technology will be required in a deeply integrated and pervasive way, woven into the fabric of daily life. It won’t be a separate “thing” but rather the foundation upon which civilization functions. Here’s how it might be required:

By Necessity: Resource depletion, climate change, and environmental degradation will likely have reached a point where unsustainable practices are simply impossible. Sustainable technology will be the only viable option for survival.
Through Systemic Design: Everything from infrastructure to manufacturing will be designed with sustainability as a core principle. Closed-loop systems, renewable energy, and resource efficiency will be built into the very foundations of society.
Through Technological Advancement: Technology itself may have evolved to a point where sustainability is inherent. New materials, energy sources, and processes could be so efficient and environmentally friendly that there’s no other practical choice.
Through Cultural Norms: Sustainability will likely be deeply ingrained in societal values and behaviors. People will expect and demand sustainable products and services, and unsustainable practices will be socially unacceptable.
Through Regulation and Governance: It’s conceivable that by 4730, global or even interplanetary governance structures might exist, with strict regulations mandating sustainable practices across all sectors.
Through Economic Imperative: In a world of limited resources, sustainable practices will likely be the most economically viable option. Waste and inefficiency will be too costly to tolerate.
Through Personal Responsibility: Individuals will likely have a deep understanding of their impact on the environment and will actively participate in sustainable practices in their daily lives.

In essence, by 4730, sustainable technology won’t be something that’s “required” in the sense of a mandate or a choice. It will be the default way of doing things, the very foundation of how society functions, driven by necessity, technology, culture, and economics. It will be as essential and integrated as the air we breathe.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4730 ?

It’s tricky to do a traditional “case study” of sustainable technology in 4730, as that would involve observing and analyzing a real-world situation. But, we can create a hypothetical case study, based on logical extrapolations of current trends and potential future developments. Here’s an attempt:

Case Study: The Revitalization of the Amazon Rainforest in 4730

Background: By the mid-21st century, the Amazon rainforest had been drastically reduced due to deforestation, agriculture, and climate change. This led to severe ecological consequences, including loss of biodiversity, disrupted weather patterns, and decreased carbon sequestration.

The Solution: In 4730, the Amazon is a thriving ecosystem again, thanks to a combination of advanced sustainable technologies:

AI-powered Reforestation: Autonomous drones and robots, guided by sophisticated AI algorithms, replanted native trees and restored degraded areas. The AI also optimized planting strategies based on soil conditions, climate patterns, and biodiversity needs.
Bio-Integrated Sensors: A network of tiny, bio-integrated sensors monitored the health of the rainforest in real-time. These sensors provided data on soil moisture, nutrient levels, plant growth, and even animal behavior, allowing for proactive interventions and adaptive management.
Advanced Biomanufacturing: Sustainable biomanufacturing techniques were used to create bio-based materials for construction and infrastructure, reducing the need for resource-intensive materials like concrete and steel. This was crucial for building sustainable communities within the rainforest region.
Symbiotic Agriculture: Advanced hydroponics and vertical farming techniques, integrated with the rainforest ecosystem, provided food for local communities without further deforestation. These systems were designed to mimic natural cycles, minimizing waste and maximizing resource efficiency.
Renewable Energy Microgrids: Decentralized renewable energy microgrids, powered by solar, wind, and biomass, provided clean energy for communities and infrastructure within the rainforest. These microgrids were designed to be resilient and adaptable to changing environmental conditions.

Outcomes:

The Amazon rainforest has regained much of its former size and biodiversity.
Local communities live in harmony with the ecosystem, benefiting from sustainable agriculture and economic opportunities.
The rainforest plays a crucial role in regulating the global climate.
Advanced technologies are seamlessly integrated into the ecosystem, supporting its health and resilience.

Lessons Learned:

Sustainable technology is not just about individual devices or solutions, but about creating integrated systems that work in harmony with nature.
AI and data analytics play a crucial role in understanding and managing complex ecosystems.
Biomanufacturing and bio-integrated technologies offer immense potential for creating sustainable solutions.
Collaboration between scientists, engineers, and local communities is essential for successful ecosystem restoration.

This hypothetical case study illustrates how sustainable technology, combined with human ingenuity and a commitment to ecological principles, could help restore and protect vital ecosystems in the distant future.

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4730 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 4730: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 4730. Based on current trends and plausible future developments, it envisions a world where sustainability is not just a practice, but a fundamental principle woven into the fabric of civilization. It examines key technological advancements across various sectors, highlighting their potential impact on resource management, environmental preservation, and human well-being. While speculative, this exploration serves as a valuable exercise in long-term thinking, emphasizing the importance of prioritizing sustainability today to ensure a thriving future for generations to come.

1. Introduction:

The challenges of the 21st century, including climate change, resource depletion, and environmental degradation, necessitate a radical shift towards sustainable practices. This white paper projects forward to 4730, a time when sustainable technology will likely be not just desirable, but essential for human survival and planetary health. It posits that by this distant future, technological advancements will have converged to create a world where sustainability is seamlessly integrated into every aspect of life.

2. Key Technological Domains:

Energy: Fusion power will likely be the dominant energy source, providing clean, abundant, and safe power. Advanced smart grids will optimize energy distribution and minimize waste. Localized renewable energy sources, like geothermal and advanced solar, will supplement fusion power, creating resilient and decentralized energy systems.
Resource Management: Closed-loop systems will be the norm, minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization. Advanced recycling technologies will recover valuable materials from waste streams, effectively eliminating landfills. Nanotechnology will play a crucial role in creating new materials with enhanced properties and recyclability.
Food Production: Vertical farms and advanced hydroponics will be integrated into urban environments, providing fresh, locally grown food with minimal environmental impact. Precision agriculture, utilizing AI and bio-integrated sensors, will optimize crop yields while minimizing water and fertilizer usage. Cultivated meat and other alternative protein sources will further reduce the environmental footprint of food production.
Transportation: Personal air mobility and high-speed maglev trains will be commonplace, powered by clean energy sources. Autonomous vehicles will optimize traffic flow and reduce accidents. Sustainable aviation fuels and advanced battery technologies will further reduce the environmental impact of transportation.
Manufacturing: 3D printing and nanotechnology will enable on-demand manufacturing, reducing waste and the need for large-scale factories. Products will be designed for disassembly and reuse, promoting a circular economy. Biomanufacturing will create sustainable alternatives to traditional materials, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and other finite resources.
Environmental Remediation: Advanced technologies will be deployed to restore damaged ecosystems and mitigate the effects of past environmental degradation. Carbon capture and sequestration technologies will help to remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere. Geoengineering techniques, if necessary, will be used cautiously and responsibly to manage the global climate.
Healthcare: Nanobots and AI-powered diagnostics will enable personalized medicine and targeted drug delivery. Bioprinting will create artificial organs and tissues, eliminating the need for organ donors. Advanced sanitation and hygiene technologies will prevent the spread of infectious diseases.

3. Societal and Ethical Considerations:

The widespread adoption of sustainable technology in 4730 will have profound societal and ethical implications. It will require:

Global Cooperation: International collaboration will be essential to address global challenges like climate change and resource management.
Ethical Frameworks: Robust ethical frameworks will be needed to guide the development and deployment of advanced technologies, ensuring that they are used responsibly and for the benefit of all humanity.
Education and Awareness: Education and public awareness campaigns will be crucial for fostering a culture of sustainability and ensuring that individuals understand their role in creating a sustainable future.

4. Conclusion:

The vision of sustainable technology in 4730 presented in this white paper is ambitious but achievable. By prioritizing sustainability today and investing in the development of key technologies, we can create a future where humanity thrives in harmony with the planet. While the specific technologies described here may evolve in unforeseen ways, the fundamental principles of sustainability – resource efficiency, environmental protection, and social equity – will remain essential for ensuring a prosperous future for generations to come. This long-term perspective is crucial for guiding our actions today and building a sustainable legacy for the future.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4730 ?

It’s fascinating to speculate on the industrial applications of sustainable technology in 4730. Given the likely advancements, industry wouldn’t just be using sustainable technology, it would be fundamentally built upon it. Here are some potential applications:

Closed-Loop Manufacturing: Factories would operate on closed-loop systems, where waste is virtually eliminated. Every byproduct would be a resource for another process. Nanotechnology and advanced materials science would enable the creation of products designed for disassembly and reuse, creating a truly circular economy.
On-Demand Production: 3D printing and advanced additive manufacturing would allow for highly customized, on-demand production. This would drastically reduce the need for mass production and warehousing, minimizing waste and resource consumption. Imagine ordering a product, and the raw materials are transformed and assembled locally, minimizing transportation needs.
Localized Resource Extraction: Advanced mining and resource extraction techniques, perhaps utilizing AI and robotics, would be highly precise and minimally invasive. They might even focus on extracting resources from previously discarded materials or even from space, reducing the impact on Earth’s ecosystems.
Biomanufacturing: Industrial processes would increasingly rely on biomanufacturing, using biological systems to create materials, chemicals, and even energy. Imagine factories that grow materials like advanced polymers or biofuels, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and traditional chemical manufacturing.
Sustainable Energy Integration: Industrial facilities would be completely powered by renewable energy sources, likely a combination of fusion power, localized renewable microgrids, and potentially even energy harvested from the environment (e.g., ambient vibrations).
AI-Driven Optimization: Artificial intelligence would be deeply integrated into all aspects of industrial operations, optimizing processes for efficiency, minimizing waste, and predicting potential problems before they occur. Imagine AI managing entire supply chains, ensuring that resources are used efficiently and that production is aligned with demand.
Personalized Production: Manufacturing would be highly personalized, catering to individual needs and preferences. 3D printing and other advanced manufacturing techniques would allow for the creation of customized products on a mass scale, eliminating the need for standardized, one-size-fits-all products.
Decentralized Production: Manufacturing would likely be more decentralized, with smaller, localized production facilities replacing large, centralized factories. This would reduce transportation costs and environmental impact, and it would also make supply chains more resilient to disruptions.
Symbiotic Industry: Industries might even operate in a symbiotic relationship with the environment, mimicking natural ecosystems. For example, one factory’s waste could be another factory’s raw material, creating a network of interconnected businesses that minimize environmental impact.

These are just a few possibilities. The industrial landscape of 4730 would likely be unrecognizable to us today, driven by the need for absolute sustainability and enabled by incredible technological advancements. It would be a world where industry and the environment are not in conflict, but rather work in harmony.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4730 ?

It’s exciting to imagine the kind of research and development that would be driving sustainable technology in 4730! Here are some potential areas of focus:

1. Advanced Energy Systems:

Fusion Reactor Optimization: While fusion power might be commonplace, research would likely focus on improving its efficiency, safety, and cost-effectiveness. This could involve exploring new reactor designs, plasma confinement techniques, and materials science.
Exotic Energy Sources: Scientists might be investigating even more unconventional energy sources, such as zero-point energy or harnessing energy from other dimensions (if such things are possible!).
Energy Storage & Transmission: Developing ultra-efficient energy storage solutions and lossless energy transmission technologies would be crucial for maximizing the use of renewable energy sources and ensuring grid stability.

2. Materials Science & Nanotechnology:

Programmable Matter: Research into programmable matter could revolutionize manufacturing, allowing for the creation of materials with dynamically adjustable properties. Imagine materials that can change their shape, density, or even function on demand.
Self-Healing Materials: Developing materials that can automatically repair themselves would be essential for creating long-lasting and resilient infrastructure. This could involve integrating nanotechnology with biological systems to mimic natural healing processes.
Bio-Integrated Materials: Scientists might be creating materials that seamlessly integrate with living organisms, with applications in medicine, environmental remediation, and even construction.

3. Biotechnology & Biomanufacturing:

Synthetic Biology: Research in synthetic biology could lead to the creation of microorganisms that can produce valuable materials, fuels, or even medicines. This could revolutionize manufacturing and reduce our reliance on fossil fuels.
Advanced Biomanufacturing: Scientists might be developing new biomanufacturing techniques that allow for the creation of complex products, such as electronics or even entire organs, using biological systems.
Genetic Engineering: Ethical and responsible genetic engineering could be used to develop crops that are more resilient to climate change, require less water and fertilizer, and have enhanced nutritional value.

4. Artificial Intelligence & Robotics:

AI for Ecosystem Management: Developing AI systems that can monitor and manage complex ecosystems would be crucial for preserving biodiversity and mitigating the effects of climate change.
Autonomous Systems: Research into advanced robotics and AI could lead to the creation of autonomous systems that can perform a wide range of tasks, from resource extraction to environmental remediation.
Human-Computer Interfaces: Scientists might be developing new ways for humans to interact with computers and AI systems, potentially through brain-computer interfaces or other advanced forms of communication.

5. Environmental Science & Geoengineering:

Climate Modeling: Improving our understanding of the Earth’s climate system through advanced modeling and data analysis would be crucial for predicting and mitigating the effects of climate change.
Geoengineering: Research into geoengineering techniques, such as carbon capture and solar radiation management, might be necessary to address climate change, but these technologies would need to be carefully studied and deployed to avoid unintended consequences.
Ecosystem Restoration: Developing new techniques for restoring damaged ecosystems, such as coral reefs or rainforests, would be essential for preserving biodiversity and ensuring the long-term health of the planet.

6. Social Sciences & Ethics:

Sustainable Development: Research in the social sciences would be crucial for understanding the social and economic factors that influence sustainability. This could involve studying human behavior, developing new economic models, and creating policies that promote sustainable development.
Ethics of Technology: As technology advances, it’s essential to consider the ethical implications of new developments. Research in ethics and philosophy would be crucial for guiding the development and deployment of sustainable technologies in a responsible way.

It’s important to remember that this is just a glimpse into the potential research and development landscape of 4730. The actual areas of focus will depend on the challenges and opportunities that humanity faces in the coming centuries. But one thing is certain: research and development will play a crucial role in creating a sustainable future for all.

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.