79 / 100

Sustainable technology of 4720 ?

It seems you might be asking about the sustainable technology related to a specific product or model number “4720”.

Unfortunately, with just the number “4720”, it’s impossible to pinpoint the exact product or technology you’re interested in.

To help me understand and answer your question better, could you please provide more context? For example:

  • What kind of product is it? (e.g., a machine, a vehicle, a piece of equipment)
  • What is the brand or manufacturer?
  • What is the full model name or number?

With more information, I can look into the specific sustainable technologies associated with that product.

In the meantime, here are some general examples of sustainable technologies that are being incorporated into various products across different industries:

  • Energy efficiency: This includes features like energy-saving motors, LED lighting, and optimized designs to reduce energy consumption.
  • Renewable energy: Some products are designed to utilize renewable energy sources like solar power or wind energy.
  • Recycled materials: Many manufacturers are using recycled materials in their products to reduce waste and conserve resources.
  • Reduced emissions: Technologies are being developed to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases and other pollutants from vehicles, machinery, and industrial processes.
  • Sustainable packaging: Companies are moving away from single-use plastics and adopting more sustainable packaging options like biodegradable or recyclable materials.

I look forward to learning more about the specific technology you’re interested in!

What is Sustainable technology of 4720 ?

Unfortunately, with just the number “4720”, it’s still very difficult to determine the specific sustainable technology you’re interested in. This number could refer to a wide range of products or components.

To help me understand and answer your question better, could you please provide more context? For example:

  • What kind of product is it? (e.g., a machine, a vehicle, a piece of equipment, a software, a material)
  • What is the brand or manufacturer?
  • What is the full model name or number?

With more information, I can look into the specific sustainable technologies associated with that product.

In the meantime, here are some general examples of sustainable technologies that are being incorporated into various products across different industries:

  • Energy efficiency: This includes features like energy-saving motors, LED lighting, and optimized designs to reduce energy consumption.
  • Renewable energy: Some products are designed to utilize renewable energy sources like solar power or wind energy.
  • Recycled materials: Many manufacturers are using recycled materials in their products to reduce waste and conserve resources.
  • Reduced emissions: Technologies are being developed to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases and other pollutants from vehicles, machinery, and industrial processes.
  • Sustainable packaging: Companies are moving away from single-use plastics and adopting more sustainable packaging options like biodegradable or recyclable materials.

I look forward to learning more about the specific technology you’re interested in!

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4720 ?

Unfortunately, even with the number “4720”, it’s still very difficult to determine who specifically requires this sustainable technology. This number could refer to a wide range of products or components used in various industries.

To help me understand and answer your question better, could you please provide more context? For example:

  • What kind of product is it? (e.g., a machine, a vehicle, a piece of equipment, a software, a material)
  • What is the brand or manufacturer?
  • What is the full model name or number?

With more information, I can look into the specific sustainable technologies associated with that product and potentially identify the users or industries that might require it.

In the meantime, here are some general examples of who might require sustainable technologies:

  • Manufacturers: Companies across various sectors are increasingly adopting sustainable technologies to reduce their environmental impact, improve resource efficiency, and meet consumer demand for eco-friendly products.
  • Consumers: Individuals are becoming more aware of the environmental impact of their choices and are seeking sustainable products and services.
  • Governments: Governments are implementing regulations and incentives to promote the adoption of sustainable technologies in various sectors, such as transportation, energy, and construction.
  • Industries: Specific industries like transportation, energy, agriculture, and construction are facing increasing pressure to adopt sustainable practices and technologies to reduce their environmental footprint.

I look forward to learning more about the specific technology you’re interested in!

When is required Sustainable technology of 4720 ?

As before, the number “4720” alone doesn’t give enough information to determine when the associated sustainable technology is required. It’s like asking “When is the number 10 important?” – it depends on the context!

To figure out when a sustainable technology related to “4720” might be required, we need to know what “4720” refers to.

Here’s why context is key, and some general examples:

  • If “4720” refers to a component in a manufacturing process: The sustainable technology (e.g., energy-efficient motors) might be required during the manufacturing process itself, whenever that process is running. It might also be required when designing or upgrading the manufacturing equipment.
  • If “4720” refers to a vehicle part: The sustainable technology (e.g., lightweight, recycled materials) might be required during the vehicle’s production. It might also be required when designing new vehicle models to meet emissions standards.
  • If “4720” refers to a material used in construction: The sustainable technology (e.g., sustainably sourced timber) might be required during the construction phase of a building project.
  • If “4720” refers to a software or IT system: The sustainable technology (e.g., energy-efficient servers, optimized algorithms) might be required when the system is being developed or deployed, and continuously as the system operates to minimize its environmental impact.
  • General Drivers for Sustainable Technology Adoption: Regardless of what “4720” is, some general “when” factors driving the need for sustainable technology include:
    • New Regulations: When governments introduce stricter environmental regulations, companies must adopt sustainable technologies to comply.
    • Market Demand: Increasing consumer preference for eco-friendly products and services drives companies to adopt sustainable practices.
    • Resource Scarcity: As resources become scarcer and more expensive, sustainable technologies that use resources more efficiently become essential.
    • Technological Advancements: New innovations in sustainable technology make it more feasible and cost-effective to implement.

Please provide more details about what “4720” is, and I can give you a much more specific answer about when the related sustainable technology might be required.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4720 ?

Unfortunately, even with the number “4720”, it’s still very difficult to pinpoint the exact location where the associated sustainable technology is required. This number could refer to a wide range of products or components used in various industries and locations.

To help me understand and answer your question better, could you please provide more context? For example:

  • What kind of product is it? (e.g., a machine, a vehicle, a piece of equipment, a software, a material)
  • What is the brand or manufacturer?
  • What is the full model name or number?

With more information, I can look into the specific sustainable technologies associated with that product and potentially identify the locations where it might be required.

In the meantime, here are some general examples of where sustainable technologies might be required:

  • Factories and manufacturing plants: Sustainable technologies are needed to reduce energy consumption, minimize waste, and control pollution in industrial settings.
  • Transportation systems: Sustainable technologies are crucial for developing cleaner and more efficient transportation systems, including electric vehicles, public transportation, and infrastructure for alternative fuels.
  • Buildings and construction sites: Sustainable building materials and energy-efficient designs are needed to create environmentally friendly buildings and reduce the impact of construction on the environment.
  • Energy sector: Sustainable technologies are essential for generating renewable energy, improving energy efficiency, and reducing reliance on fossil fuels.
  • Agriculture and food production: Sustainable practices and technologies are needed to ensure food security while minimizing the environmental impact of agriculture.
  • Homes and communities: Sustainable technologies can be implemented in homes and communities to reduce energy and water consumption, manage waste, and promote sustainable living.

I look forward to learning more about the specific technology you’re interested in!

How is required Sustainable technology of 4720 ?

You’re still asking about “4720,” and without knowing what that refers to, I can only give general answers about how sustainable technology is required, not specifically how that technology is required. It’s like asking “How is a tool used?” without saying what the tool is. A hammer is used differently than a screwdriver.

Here are some general ways that sustainable technology is required, driven by different factors:

  • Regulations and Laws: Governments often mandate the use of certain sustainable technologies through laws and regulations. For example, emissions standards for vehicles require manufacturers to use cleaner engines and technologies. Building codes may require energy-efficient insulation or solar panels.
  • Market Demand and Consumer Pressure: Consumers are increasingly demanding sustainable products and services. This market pressure compels companies to adopt sustainable technologies to remain competitive. Think about the demand for electric cars or products with recycled packaging.
  • Economic Incentives: Governments or other organizations might offer financial incentives, like tax breaks or subsidies, to encourage the adoption of sustainable technologies. This makes it more financially attractive for businesses and individuals to invest in sustainable solutions.
  • Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Sustainability Goals: Many companies are setting their own sustainability targets and incorporating sustainable technologies as part of their CSR initiatives. This can be driven by a desire to reduce their environmental impact, improve their brand image, or attract investors who prioritize sustainability.
  • Technological Advancements: As new and more efficient sustainable technologies are developed, they become more attractive and practical to implement. Innovations in renewable energy, energy storage, and materials science are driving the adoption of sustainable solutions.
  • Resource Scarcity and Cost Savings: As resources like fossil fuels become scarcer and more expensive, sustainable technologies that use resources more efficiently or rely on renewable sources become increasingly necessary for economic reasons. Reducing waste and improving resource efficiency can also lead to cost savings.
  • Industry Standards and Best Practices: Some industries develop their own standards and best practices for sustainability. Companies that want to be leaders in their field or gain certifications may need to adopt specific sustainable technologies.

To understand how the sustainable technology related to “4720” is required, please provide more information about what “4720” represents.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4720 ?

It seems you’re trying to figure out if there’s a connection between “Sustainable technology” and “4720” by asking if a “case study” exists. Unfortunately, without knowing what “4720” represents, it’s impossible to say for sure.

However, I can tell you that case studies are a very common and important tool for understanding and promoting sustainable technology.

Here’s why case studies are relevant to sustainable technology:

  • Real-world examples: Case studies provide concrete examples of how sustainable technologies are being implemented in practice. They showcase the challenges, solutions, and outcomes of real-world projects, making the concepts more tangible and relatable.
  • Learning from successes and failures: Case studies can highlight successful strategies and best practices for implementing sustainable technology. They can also reveal potential pitfalls and lessons learned from projects that didn’t go as planned, helping others avoid similar mistakes.
  • Demonstrating benefits: Case studies can provide evidence of the benefits of sustainable technology, such as cost savings, environmental impact reduction, and social benefits. This evidence can be used to justify investments in sustainable solutions and encourage wider adoption.
  • Inspiring innovation: Case studies can inspire innovation by showcasing cutting-edge sustainable technologies and approaches. They can spark new ideas and encourage further development in the field.

If “4720” refers to a specific product, technology, or project, there’s a good chance that a case study exists or could be developed to explore its sustainability aspects.

To find relevant case studies, you can try searching online using keywords related to sustainable technology and the specific area you’re interested in. You can also look for case studies published by organizations working in the field of sustainability, such as research institutions, government agencies, and NGOs.

If you can provide more context about “4720”, I might be able to help you find specific case studies related to it.

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4720 ?

As with the previous questions, the number “4720” by itself doesn’t give enough information to determine if a white paper exists about its sustainable technology aspects. It’s like asking if there’s a white paper about “the number 12.” It depends entirely on what the number refers to.

However, I can tell you that white papers are often used to discuss and explain sustainable technologies. They can be produced by:

  • Manufacturers: Companies developing sustainable technologies often publish white papers to explain the technology’s features, benefits, and applications. This can be a way to educate potential customers and promote their products.
  • Research Institutions: Universities and research organizations may release white papers summarizing their findings on sustainable technologies and offering recommendations for policy or implementation.
  • Consulting Firms: Consulting firms specializing in sustainability might publish white papers to share their expertise and insights on specific topics related to sustainable technology.
  • Industry Associations: Organizations representing specific industries may create white papers to discuss the challenges and opportunities related to sustainable technology adoption within their sector.
  • Government Agencies: Government bodies might release white papers outlining policies, regulations, or initiatives related to sustainable technology.

If “4720” refers to a specific product, technology, or project, it’s possible that a white paper exists or could be created to explore its sustainability aspects.

To find relevant white papers, you can try searching online using keywords related to sustainable technology and the specific area you’re interested in. Adding “white paper” to your search terms can help narrow down the results. You can also check the websites of organizations involved in sustainability, such as those mentioned above.

If you can provide more context about what “4720” refers to, I may be able to help you find specific white papers related to it.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4720 ?

You’re right to ask about industrial applications! That’s where a lot of sustainable technology really makes a difference. However, I still need to know what “4720” refers to before I can be specific.

In the meantime, here are some general examples of how sustainable technology is being applied in various industries:

1. Manufacturing:

  • Energy efficiency: Factories are adopting energy-efficient machinery, LED lighting, and smart energy management systems to reduce their energy consumption and carbon footprint.
  • Waste reduction: Technologies like 3D printing and advanced recycling processes are helping manufacturers minimize waste and reuse materials.
  • Sustainable materials: Industries are increasingly using recycled, renewable, and biodegradable materials in their products and packaging.
  • Cleaner production processes: Manufacturers are implementing closed-loop systems and other technologies to reduce pollution and minimize the environmental impact of their operations.

2. Energy:

  • Renewable energy: Industries are investing in solar, wind, and other renewable energy sources to power their operations and reduce their reliance on fossil fuels.
  • Smart grids: Smart grid technologies are being used to optimize energy distribution and reduce energy waste.
  • Energy storage: Advanced battery technologies and other energy storage solutions are helping to make renewable energy more reliable and accessible.

3. Transportation:

  • Electric vehicles: The automotive industry is rapidly shifting towards electric vehicles (EVs) to reduce emissions and dependence on fossil fuels.
  • Alternative fuels: Industries are exploring and adopting alternative fuels like biofuels and hydrogen to power vehicles and machinery.
  • Sustainable logistics: Companies are optimizing logistics and transportation routes to reduce fuel consumption and emissions.

4. Agriculture:

  • Precision agriculture: Technologies like GPS, sensors, and data analytics are being used to optimize farming practices, reduce water and fertilizer use, and minimize environmental impact.
  • Sustainable farming practices: Farmers are adopting practices like no-till farming, crop rotation, and integrated pest management to improve soil health and reduce environmental impact.

5. Construction:

  • Sustainable building materials: The construction industry is increasingly using recycled, renewable, and locally sourced materials to reduce the environmental impact of buildings.
  • Energy-efficient buildings: Buildings are being designed and constructed with energy-efficient features like insulation, solar panels, and smart building management systems.

6. Information and Communication Technology (ICT):

  • Energy-efficient data centers: Data centers are being designed and operated with energy-efficient cooling systems and renewable energy sources to reduce their environmental footprint.
  • Sustainable hardware: Manufacturers are using recycled and renewable materials in the production of electronic devices and promoting e-waste recycling.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technology is being applied across various industries. The specific applications will vary depending on the industry and the specific challenges it faces.

If you can tell me more about what “4720” is, I can give you more specific examples of its industrial applications in sustainable technology.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4720 ?

You’re hitting on a very important point! Research and development (R&D) is absolutely crucial for the advancement of sustainable technology. It’s how we find better solutions, make existing ones more efficient, and develop entirely new approaches.

However, as with all the previous questions, without knowing what “4720” refers to, I can only give you general information about R&D in sustainable technology.

Here are some key areas of R&D in sustainable technology:

  • Renewable Energy:
    • Improving efficiency: Researchers are working on making solar panels, wind turbines, and other renewable energy technologies more efficient and cost-effective.
    • Energy storage: Developing better ways to store renewable energy, such as advanced batteries and pumped hydro storage, is essential for making renewable energy more reliable.
    • New technologies: Scientists are exploring new forms of renewable energy, such as wave energy, geothermal energy, and advanced biofuels.
  • Energy Efficiency:
    • Materials science: Researchers are developing new materials that are more energy-efficient for use in buildings, vehicles, and other applications.
    • Smart technologies: Developing smart grids and other technologies to optimize energy use and reduce waste is a key area of research.
  • Sustainable Materials:
    • Recycling and reuse: Scientists are working on improving recycling technologies and finding new ways to reuse materials.
    • Bioplastics and biodegradable materials: Researchers are developing alternatives to traditional plastics that are made from renewable resources and can biodegrade.
  • Reducing Emissions:
    • Carbon capture and storage: Technologies to capture carbon dioxide emissions from industrial sources and store them underground are being researched and developed.
    • Cleaner fuels: Scientists are working on developing cleaner fuels for vehicles and other applications, such as hydrogen and advanced biofuels.
  • Sustainable Agriculture:
    • Precision agriculture: Researchers are developing technologies to optimize farming practices and reduce the environmental impact of agriculture.
    • Sustainable farming methods: Scientists are studying and promoting sustainable farming practices like no-till farming and crop rotation.
  • Water Management:
    • Water purification and desalination: Researchers are working on developing more efficient and cost-effective ways to purify and desalinate water.
    • Water conservation: Technologies and strategies to conserve water in agriculture, industry, and homes are being developed.

Who is involved in R&D of sustainable technology?

  • Universities and research institutions: They conduct basic and applied research on various aspects of sustainable technology.
  • Government agencies: They fund research and development projects and set policies to promote sustainable technology.
  • Private companies: Many companies invest in R&D to develop new sustainable technologies and improve existing ones.
  • Non-governmental organizations (NGOs): NGOs often play a role in promoting research and development of sustainable technology and advocating for its adoption.

How can I find out more about R&D related to “4720”?

If you can provide more context about what “4720” is, I can help you find specific information about related research and development efforts. You can also try searching online using keywords related to sustainable technology and the specific area you’re interested in

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

References

  1. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”Sustainability Science14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681Pdoi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5ISSN 1862-4065 Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075Rdoi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3ISSN 1187-7863S2CID 146790960.
  3. Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”Sustainability2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424hdl:10535/6499ISSN 2071-1050 Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1OCLC 1124780147.
  6. Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”Sustainability2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”Environmental Science & Policy112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236Vdoi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016PMC 7330600PMID 32834777.
  12. Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”Sustainability9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165hdl:10453/90953ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”Global Environmental Change68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222Adoi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”Society & Natural Resources27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777Bdoi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467ISSN 0894-1920S2CID 67783261.
  21. Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better FutureStockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011S2CID 248881465.
  22. Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”Annual Review of Environment and Resources41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039ISSN 1543-5938S2CID 156534921.
  23. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”Papers in Applied Geography2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365Hdoi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222ISSN 2375-4931S2CID 132458202.
  24. Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”Global Policy14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160ISSN 1758-5880S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”Resource Management and Optimization8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”Environmental Conservation14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101Bdoi:10.1017/S0376892900011449ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”Sustainability Science16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949Edoi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5PMC 7960882PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”BioScience67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125hdl:11336/71342ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”Nature415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23Cdoi:10.1038/415023aISSN 0028-0836PMID 11780095S2CID 9743349.
  53. Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”Sustainable Development13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon PressISBN 0-8070-4708-2OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”Sustainability8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”Sustainability11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”Geography Compass4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”Journal of Cleaner Production140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42Mdoi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”Sustainability8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: RoutledgeISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”Environment, Development and Sustainability15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225Mdoi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77Vdoi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”Ecological Economics8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103Pdoi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”Ecological Economics17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147Cdoi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3OCLC 951915998.
  77. Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: RoutledgeISBN 9781315765747.
  79. Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”Sustainability11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”Environmental Science & Technology56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510Pdoi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158ISSN 0013-936XPMC 8811958PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”Nature Communications11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107Wdoi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-yISSN 2041-1723PMC 7305220PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island PressISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random HouseISBN 978-1-84794-138-1OCLC 974194745.
  96. Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”Earth System Governance11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131Pdoi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131 Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”PNAS Nexus3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106PMC 10986754PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”Environmental Research Letters15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003Hdoi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842aISSN 1748-9326S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island PressISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4OCLC 704557307.
  107. Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”PLOS Biology10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405ISSN 1544-9173PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11Gdoi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”Journal of Cleaner Production314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973Ndoi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”Global Discourse7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”Sustainability15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054ISSN 2071-1050.

Recommended HashTags

.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »