Sustainable technology of 4670

79 / 100

Sustainable technology of 4670 ?

While the year 4670 is far in the future, we can still speculate on what sustainable technology might look like then. Here are some possibilities:

Energy: Fusion power may be a reality, providing clean and abundant energy. Solar energy could be collected from space and beamed down to Earth. Energy storage solutions may be incredibly efficient, allowing for the use of renewable energy sources even when the sun isn’t shining or the wind isn’t blowing.
Transportation: Flying cars and other forms of personal air transportation may be common, powered by clean energy sources. Hyperloops or other high-speed ground transportation systems could connect cities and regions. Self-driving electric vehicles may be the norm on city streets.
Manufacturing: Nanotechnology and 3D printing could allow for the creation of any product on demand, using sustainable materials. Factories may be fully automated and operate with minimal environmental impact.
Agriculture: Vertical farms and other forms of indoor agriculture may be widespread, allowing for the production of food in any climate and with minimal use of land and water. Genetically modified crops may be more resilient and require fewer resources.
Waste management: Advanced recycling technologies could allow for the reuse of almost all materials. Waste may be seen as a resource rather than a problem.
Communication: Brain-computer interfaces could be common, allowing for communication without the need for devices. The internet may be integrated into our minds, providing access to information and entertainment at all times.

It is important to note that these are just possibilities, and the actual sustainable technologies of 4670 may be very different. However, it is clear that technology will play a key role in creating a more sustainable future.

What is Sustainable technology of 4670 ?

It’s fascinating to think about sustainable technology in 4670! While we can’t predict the future with certainty, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and potential advancements. Here are some possibilities:

Energy:

Fusion power: This could be a primary energy source, providing clean and abundant energy.
Space-based solar power: Solar energy might be collected in space and beamed down to Earth, ensuring a constant supply regardless of weather or time of day.
Highly efficient energy storage: Advanced technologies could allow for the storage of vast amounts of energy, making renewable sources like solar and wind power even more reliable.

Transportation:

Personal air transportation: Flying cars or other forms of personal air travel could be common, powered by clean energy sources.
High-speed ground transport: Hyperloops or similar systems might connect cities and regions, enabling fast and efficient travel with minimal environmental impact.
Autonomous electric vehicles: Self-driving electric vehicles could be the norm on city streets, reducing congestion and pollution.

Manufacturing:

Nanotechnology and 3D printing: These technologies could enable the creation of any product on demand, using sustainable materials and minimizing waste.
Automated factories: Factories might be fully automated and operate with minimal environmental impact, using closed-loop systems and advanced recycling technologies.

Agriculture:

Vertical farms and indoor agriculture: These methods could be widespread, allowing for food production in any climate with minimal use of land and water.
Genetically modified crops: Crops might be more resilient and require fewer resources, reducing the need for pesticides and fertilizers.

Waste Management:

Advanced recycling technologies: These could allow for the reuse of almost all materials, eliminating the concept of waste as we know it today.
Waste as a resource: Waste might be seen as a valuable resource, with advanced technologies used to extract valuable materials and energy from it.

Communication:

Brain-computer interfaces: These could be common, allowing for communication without the need for devices.
Integrated internet: The internet might be seamlessly integrated into our minds, providing access to information and entertainment at all times.

Other Possibilities:

Advanced materials: New, sustainable materials with incredible properties could be developed, revolutionizing construction, manufacturing, and other industries.
Climate engineering: Technologies to actively manage the Earth’s climate might be developed to counteract the effects of climate change.
Artificial intelligence: AI could play a crucial role in optimizing resource use, managing ecosystems, and developing new sustainable technologies.

It’s important to remember that these are just possibilities, and the actual sustainable technologies of 4670 might be very different. However, it’s clear that technology will continue to play a vital role in creating a more sustainable future for humanity.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4670 ?

It’s not a question of who requires sustainable technology in 4670, but rather that it will be a necessity for everyone and everything. Here’s why:

Resource Scarcity: Even with advanced technology, Earth’s resources are finite. By 4670, the need to use resources efficiently and minimize waste will be paramount. Sustainable technology will be essential for managing resources responsibly and ensuring their availability for future generations.
Environmental Limits: The impact of climate change and other environmental issues will likely be even more pronounced in 4670. Sustainable technology will be crucial for mitigating these impacts and maintaining a habitable planet.
Population Growth: If human population continues to grow, the demand for resources and energy will increase. Sustainable technology will be necessary to meet these demands without further straining the environment.
Economic Viability: In the long term, only a sustainable economic system can thrive. Sustainable technology will be essential for creating a circular economy where resources are used efficiently and waste is minimized, ensuring economic prosperity for all.
Social Equity: Sustainable technology can help address social inequalities by ensuring access to essential resources like clean energy, water, and food for everyone, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status.

In essence, sustainable technology in 4670 will be a fundamental requirement for the survival and well-being of humanity, as well as for the health of the planet. It will be integrated into every aspect of life, from energy production and transportation to manufacturing, agriculture, and communication.

It’s not just about individuals or specific industries needing sustainable technology; it’s about a fundamental shift in how we live and interact with the world, driven by necessity and a long-term vision for a thriving future.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4670 ?

You’re right to think about the timing! Sustainable technology in 4670 won’t just suddenly appear. It’s something that will be required and developed progressively over time. Here’s a breakdown of when it’s needed:

Now: The need for sustainable technology is critical right now. We’re already facing challenges like climate change, resource depletion, and pollution. The sooner we start developing and implementing sustainable solutions, the better our chances of creating a viable future.
Continuous Development: Sustainable technology in 4670 will be the result of centuries of innovation and improvement. We need to be constantly researching, developing, and refining sustainable technologies to meet evolving challenges and needs.
Adaptation: As we move closer to 4670, new challenges and opportunities will arise. Sustainable technology will need to adapt to these changes, ensuring that it remains effective and relevant.
Integration: Sustainable technology won’t be confined to specific sectors. It will need to be integrated into all aspects of life, from energy and transportation to manufacturing, agriculture, and communication. This requires ongoing effort and collaboration across different fields.

In essence, the need for sustainable technology is not a future problem, but a present imperative. The work we do today to develop and implement sustainable solutions will lay the foundation for the technologies that will be essential in 4670 and beyond.

It’s a continuous journey, with each generation building on the progress of those before it. By prioritizing sustainability now, we can ensure a better future for all.

COURTESY : TURILYTIX

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4670 ?

Sustainable technology in 4670 (and, importantly, now) is required everywhere. It’s not a matter of a specific location, but rather a global imperative. Here’s a breakdown:

Globally: Climate change, resource depletion, and pollution are global issues that require global solutions. Sustainable technologies are needed worldwide to address these challenges and ensure a healthy planet for all.
Locally: While the need is global, the implementation of sustainable technology will often be local, tailored to specific environmental conditions, resource availability, and cultural contexts. Different regions will have different needs and priorities.
In Every Sector: Sustainable technology is not limited to one particular sector. It’s needed in:
- Energy: Renewable energy sources, efficient energy storage, smart grids.
- Transportation: Electric vehicles, sustainable aviation fuels, efficient public transportation.
- Manufacturing: Sustainable materials, closed-loop systems, waste reduction.
- Agriculture: Sustainable farming practices, vertical farms, efficient irrigation.
- Construction: Green buildings, sustainable materials, energy-efficient design.
- Communication: Energy-efficient devices, sustainable data centers.
- Everyday Life: Sustainable consumption patterns, recycling, composting.
Beyond Earth: The need for sustainable technology might even extend beyond Earth as humanity explores and potentially inhabits other planets. Resource management and environmental protection will be crucial in space exploration and colonization.

Essentially, sustainable technology is required wherever human activity takes place. It’s a fundamental shift in how we interact with the world, a recognition that our actions have consequences and that we must strive for a more balanced and harmonious relationship with the planet.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4670 ?

That’s a great question! It’s not just about what sustainable technology will be needed in 4670, but how it will be developed and implemented. Here’s a look at the “how”:

1. Continuous Research and Development:

Fundamental Science: Ongoing research in fields like physics, chemistry, biology, and materials science will be crucial for discovering new sustainable technologies.
Engineering and Design: Engineers will need to translate scientific discoveries into practical applications, designing and building sustainable systems and devices.
Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Scientists, engineers, designers, and other experts will need to work together to create holistic and integrated solutions.

2. Innovation and Adaptation:

Embracing New Ideas: Fostering a culture of innovation and experimentation will be essential for developing groundbreaking sustainable technologies.
Adapting to Change: As we move closer to 4670, new challenges and opportunities will arise. Sustainable technology will need to adapt to these changes, ensuring its continued effectiveness.

3. Integration and Implementation:

Systemic Thinking: Sustainable technology will need to be integrated into all aspects of life, from energy and transportation to manufacturing, agriculture, and communication. This requires a systemic approach, considering the interconnectedness of different systems.
Infrastructure Development: Building the necessary infrastructure to support sustainable technologies will be crucial. This includes things like smart grids, charging stations for electric vehicles, and recycling facilities.
Policy and Regulation: Governments will play a role in promoting sustainable technology through policies, regulations, and incentives.

4. Education and Awareness:

Cultivating Expertise: Educating future generations of scientists, engineers, and other professionals in the principles of sustainable technology will be essential.
Raising Awareness: Increasing public awareness of the importance of sustainable technology and encouraging sustainable behaviors will be crucial for its widespread adoption.

5. Global Collaboration:

Sharing Knowledge: Sharing research findings, best practices, and technologies across borders will accelerate the development and implementation of sustainable solutions.
Addressing Global Challenges: Many environmental challenges are global in nature, requiring international cooperation to develop and implement effective solutions.

In essence, the “how” of sustainable technology in 4670 is a combination of scientific inquiry, engineering ingenuity, systemic thinking, policy support, education, and global collaboration. It’s a continuous process of learning, adapting, and innovating to create a more sustainable future for all.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4670 ?

It’s impossible to provide a real case study of sustainable technology from 4670, as that’s far in the future. However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on current trends and potential advancements, which can be a useful exercise in imagining what might be possible.

Hypothetical Case Study: The Global Atmospheric Regeneration Network (GARN) – 4670

Background: By the mid-47th century, climate change, despite centuries of mitigation efforts, had left lasting impacts. While global temperatures were stabilized, regional weather patterns were still volatile, and some ecosystems were struggling. The Global Atmospheric Regeneration Network (GARN) was developed to address these ongoing challenges.

Technology: GARN is a complex system of interconnected technologies that work together to actively manage the Earth’s atmosphere. It consists of:

Stratospheric Aerosol Injection System (SAIS) 2.0: A highly advanced version of current solar geoengineering concepts. Instead of simply reflecting sunlight, SAIS 2.0 uses nanobots to precisely deploy and manage stratospheric aerosols, mimicking natural volcanic eruptions but with far greater control and minimal side effects. These nanobots can also actively remove certain pollutants.
Bio-Integrated Carbon Capture and Storage (BICCS): A global network of genetically engineered plants and algae that are optimized to absorb CO2 at unprecedented rates. These organisms are integrated into existing ecosystems and also cultivated in vast, managed bio-farms. The captured carbon is then stored permanently in geological formations using advanced sequestration techniques.
Advanced Weather Pattern Management (AWPM): A sophisticated system that uses a combination of AI, satellite data, and localized energy manipulation (think carefully controlled atmospheric ionization) to subtly influence weather patterns, mitigating extreme events like hurricanes and droughts. This is not about controlling the weather entirely, but about nudging it in a direction that minimizes harm.
Ocean Ecosystem Restoration Initiative (OERI): A global effort to restore and enhance ocean ecosystems, which play a crucial role in carbon sequestration and climate regulation. This involves deploying artificial reefs, managing fish populations, and using bio-remediation techniques to clean up polluted areas.

Implementation: GARN is managed by a global consortium of scientists, engineers, and policymakers. The system is constantly monitored and adjusted based on real-time data from a vast network of sensors and AI-powered models. There are strict ethical guidelines and international agreements in place to ensure that GARN is used responsibly and does not have unintended consequences.

Results: GARN has been successful in achieving its primary goals:

Stabilized Regional Climates: Extreme weather events are significantly less frequent and intense.
Enhanced Ecosystem Resilience: Ecosystems are healthier and more resilient to environmental changes.
Net Atmospheric Carbon Reduction: While not a complete return to pre-industrial levels, atmospheric CO2 is being actively reduced.

Challenges: Even with its success, GARN faces ongoing challenges:

Maintenance: Maintaining such a complex system requires constant vigilance and significant resources.
Unforeseen Consequences: Despite rigorous testing, there is always the potential for unforeseen consequences from manipulating the Earth’s atmosphere.
Ethical Considerations: The use of technologies like GARN raises complex ethical questions about human intervention in natural systems.

Conclusion: The hypothetical GARN case study illustrates how sustainable technology in the future might involve highly sophisticated, interconnected systems that actively manage the Earth’s environment. It also highlights the importance of ethical considerations, global collaboration, and continuous monitoring in ensuring that these technologies are used responsibly and effectively. It’s a glimpse into a possible future where humanity has learned to live in greater harmony with the planet, using technology not just to extract resources but also to heal and restore.

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4670 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 4670 – A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 4670. While predicting the future with certainty is impossible, we can extrapolate from current trends and imagine the advancements necessary to achieve a truly sustainable civilization. This paper outlines potential technological breakthroughs, societal shifts, and ethical considerations crucial for navigating the challenges and opportunities of the distant future.

1. Introduction:

The pursuit of sustainability is a continuous journey. By 4670, humanity will likely have faced and overcome numerous environmental challenges. Sustainable technology will be the cornerstone of a thriving future, deeply integrated into every facet of life. This paper envisions a world where resource scarcity is mitigated, ecosystems are thriving, and human well-being is prioritized.

2. Key Technological Domains:

Energy: Fusion power, space-based solar energy, and highly efficient energy storage will be commonplace. Energy will be abundant, clean, and accessible globally. Micro-reactors and localized energy generation will empower communities.
Resource Management: Nanotechnology and advanced recycling will enable a circular economy. Materials will be reused and repurposed endlessly, minimizing waste and resource depletion. “Mining” of existing landfills will recover valuable resources.
Food Production: Vertical farms, precision agriculture, and lab-grown meat will provide sustainable and nutritious food for all. Food production will be localized and resilient to climate change. Personalized nutrition based on individual biomes and needs.
Transportation: Personal air vehicles, hyperloops, and advanced autonomous electric vehicles will dominate transportation. Travel will be fast, efficient, and emission-free. Urban design will prioritize walkability and green spaces.
Environmental Remediation: Advanced geoengineering techniques, bio-remediation, and ecosystem restoration projects will actively heal damaged environments. Technologies will exist to reverse the effects of past pollution and climate change.
Communication & Computation: Brain-computer interfaces and quantum computing will revolutionize communication and access to information. The internet will be seamlessly integrated into daily life, fostering global interconnectedness.
Manufacturing & Construction: 3D printing at the molecular level will enable on-demand manufacturing of complex products with minimal waste. Buildings will be self-healing and environmentally integrated, using living materials.

3. Societal Shifts:

Global Cooperation: International collaboration will be essential for addressing global challenges and ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies.
Conscious Consumption: A shift towards mindful consumption patterns will prioritize quality, durability, and sharing over disposable goods.
Emphasis on Well-being: Society will prioritize human well-being, mental health, and community over material possessions.
Education and Empowerment: Universal access to education will empower individuals to participate in the development and implementation of sustainable solutions.

4. Ethical Considerations:

Environmental Stewardship: A deep respect for the planet and its ecosystems will guide technological development and implementation.
Equity and Access: Sustainable technologies must be accessible to all, regardless of location or socioeconomic status.
Transparency and Accountability: Mechanisms will be in place to ensure transparency and accountability in the development and use of advanced technologies.
Potential Risks: Careful consideration will be given to the potential risks and unintended consequences of new technologies.

5. Challenges and Opportunities:

Maintaining Momentum: Sustaining the drive for innovation and improvement in sustainable technology will be crucial.
Adapting to Change: Society must be prepared to adapt to the rapid pace of technological change.
Addressing Inequality: Ensuring equitable access to resources and opportunities will be a major challenge.

6. Conclusion:

The vision of sustainable technology in 4670 is one of hope and possibility. By embracing innovation, fostering global cooperation, and prioritizing ethical considerations, humanity can create a future where technology and nature coexist in harmony, ensuring a thriving planet for generations to come. The journey towards this future begins now, with the choices we make today. This white paper serves as a call to action, urging us to invest in the research, development, and implementation of sustainable technologies that will shape the world of 4670 and beyond.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4670 ?

It’s fascinating to imagine the industrial applications of sustainable technology in 4670! Here are some possibilities, extrapolating from current trends and potential advancements:

1. Advanced Manufacturing & Material Science:

Nanofactories: Imagine factories that are not huge, sprawling complexes, but rather compact, highly efficient units. Nanotechnology could enable the creation of “nanofactories” that can manipulate matter at the atomic level, building products on demand with incredible precision and minimal waste. These nanofactories could use sustainable, locally sourced materials, drastically reducing transportation needs and environmental impact.
Living Materials: Industries might utilize bio-engineered materials that can self-heal, adapt to their environment, and even biodegrade when their lifespan is over. Imagine buildings that can repair themselves or textiles that can adjust their properties based on temperature or light.
Molecular 3D Printing: This could be a revolutionary manufacturing process where products are built layer by layer from the molecular level up. This would allow for the creation of incredibly complex objects with customized properties, all from sustainable feedstock materials.

2. Energy & Resource Management:

Fusion-Powered Industries: Fusion energy could provide clean and abundant power for all industrial processes. This would eliminate the reliance on fossil fuels and drastically reduce carbon emissions.
Closed-Loop Production Systems: Industries would operate on closed-loop systems, where waste is eliminated by being reused or recycled within the production process itself. This would require advanced recycling technologies and innovative material design.
Atmospheric Resource Harvesting: Industries might be able to extract valuable resources directly from the atmosphere, such as rare earth minerals or even water in arid regions. This could reduce the need for traditional mining and its associated environmental impacts.

3. Agriculture & Food Production:

Vertical Farms & Controlled Environment Agriculture: Industrial-scale vertical farms and other forms of controlled environment agriculture could be integrated into urban areas, providing fresh, locally grown produce with minimal use of land and water.
Precision Agriculture & Automation: AI-powered systems could manage crops with incredible precision, optimizing resource use and minimizing waste. Automated systems could handle planting, harvesting, and processing, increasing efficiency and reducing labor costs.
Sustainable Aquaculture: Advanced aquaculture systems could provide a sustainable source of seafood, reducing pressure on wild fish populations. These systems could be integrated with other industries, such as using waste from agriculture to feed fish.

4. Transportation & Logistics:

Autonomous Electric Fleets: Industrial transportation could be dominated by autonomous electric vehicles, optimizing logistics and reducing emissions. These vehicles could be powered by renewable energy sources and managed by AI-powered systems.
Hyperloop Networks: Hyperloop systems could provide fast and efficient transportation of goods between industrial centers, reducing reliance on traditional transportation methods like trucking and shipping.
Localized Production & Distribution: The ability to manufacture goods locally using advanced technologies could drastically reduce the need for long-distance transportation, further minimizing environmental impact.

5. Environmental Remediation & Restoration:

Industrial-Scale Carbon Capture & Sequestration: Industries could play a role in actively removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere using advanced carbon capture and sequestration technologies.
Ecosystem Restoration & Remediation: Industries might be involved in large-scale ecosystem restoration projects, using biotechnologies and other advanced tools to heal damaged environments.
Pollution Remediation & Prevention: Advanced technologies could be used to clean up existing pollution and prevent future pollution from industrial activities.

These are just a few examples of the potential industrial applications of sustainable technology in 4670. It’s important to remember that these advancements will require ongoing research, innovation, and collaboration across different fields. By prioritizing sustainability now, we can pave the way for a future where industry and the environment coexist in harmony.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4670 ?

It’s exciting to think about the research and development (R&D) that would drive sustainable technology in 4670! Here’s a glimpse into what might be happening in labs and research centers centuries from now:

1. Fundamental Science & Discovery:

Advanced Materials Science: Researchers would be exploring new materials with unprecedented properties, like self-healing materials, super-lightweight composites, and materials that can adapt to their environment. They might even be discovering new forms of matter with unique properties.
Quantum Computing & Information Science: Quantum computing could unlock new possibilities in materials design, energy storage, and AI development, leading to breakthroughs in sustainable technologies.
Biotechnology & Synthetic Biology: Scientists might be engineering microorganisms to produce biofuels, break down pollutants, or even create new sustainable materials. Synthetic biology could revolutionize agriculture and manufacturing.
Energy Physics & Fusion Research: Continued research in fusion energy could lead to the development of highly efficient and safe fusion reactors, providing a clean and abundant energy source.

2. Engineering & Applied Sciences:

Nanotechnology & Nanorobotics: Researchers would be developing advanced nanotechnologies for applications in manufacturing, medicine, and environmental remediation. Nanorobots could be used to clean up pollution, repair damaged tissues, or even build structures at the atomic level.
Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning: AI could play a crucial role in optimizing energy grids, managing resources, and developing new sustainable technologies. Machine learning algorithms could be used to analyze vast amounts of data to identify patterns and insights that would be impossible for humans to see.
Environmental Engineering & Geoengineering: Scientists might be developing advanced geoengineering techniques to mitigate climate change and restore damaged ecosystems. This could involve manipulating the Earth’s atmosphere, oceans, or land surface to achieve specific environmental goals.
Sustainable Systems Engineering: Researchers would be designing and building complex sustainable systems, such as smart grids, closed-loop manufacturing systems, and self-sustaining agricultural systems.

3. Interdisciplinary Collaboration & Innovation:

Convergence of Disciplines: The most significant breakthroughs in sustainable technology are likely to come from the convergence of different disciplines, such as physics, biology, engineering, and computer science. Researchers from different fields would be working together to solve complex problems.
Open Innovation & Knowledge Sharing: Global collaboration and open innovation would be essential for accelerating the development of sustainable technologies. Researchers would be sharing their findings and working together to solve global challenges.
Citizen Science & Public Engagement: The public could play a more active role in research and development, contributing data, ideas, and expertise. Citizen science initiatives could help to democratize the innovation process and ensure that sustainable technologies are aligned with societal needs.

4. Ethical Considerations & Responsible Innovation:

Technology Assessment & Risk Management: Researchers would be carefully assessing the potential risks and unintended consequences of new technologies. Ethical considerations would be integrated into the research and development process from the beginning.
Social Impact Assessment: The social impact of sustainable technologies would be carefully considered, ensuring that they benefit all members of society and do not exacerbate existing inequalities.
Transparency & Accountability: Research and development in sustainable technology would be conducted with transparency and accountability, ensuring that the public has access to information and can participate in decision-making processes.

In essence, the research and development of sustainable technology in 4670 would be a continuous process of discovery, innovation, and collaboration. It would involve pushing the boundaries of science and engineering, while also considering the ethical and social implications of new technologies. By prioritizing sustainability and responsible innovation, humanity could create a future where technology and nature coexist in harmony.

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.