Sustainable technology of 4660

81 / 100

Sustainable technology of 4660 ?

The query is asking about sustainable technology in the year 4660. Given that the current year is 2025, it’s difficult to predict with certainty what specific technologies will be considered “sustainable” over 2600 years in the future. However, we can speculate based on current trends and potential future developments.

Here are some possible areas of focus for sustainable technology in 4660:

Advanced Energy Systems: By 4660, it’s likely that fossil fuels will be long obsolete. Sustainable energy sources like solar, wind, geothermal, and potentially even more advanced technologies like fusion or zero-point energy may be dominant. Energy storage and distribution systems will likely be highly sophisticated, with minimal loss and maximum efficiency.
Closed-Loop Resource Management: In a future with potentially limited resources, closed-loop systems will be crucial. This means that waste will be minimized, and resources will be reused and recycled continuously. Advanced material science and nanotechnology could play a role in creating materials that can be easily repurposed or broken down into their basic components for reuse.
Ecological Restoration and Preservation: With the potential for significant environmental changes over the centuries, technologies for ecological restoration and preservation will be essential. This could include advanced methods for reforestation, ocean cleanup, and even climate engineering to maintain a stable and habitable environment.
Sustainable Agriculture and Food Production: Feeding a growing population in a sustainable way will be a major challenge. Technologies like vertical farming, precision agriculture, and lab-grown meat could play a role in increasing food production while minimizing environmental impact.
Sustainable Transportation: Transportation will likely be dominated by electric vehicles powered by renewable energy sources. Advanced materials and designs could lead to more efficient and sustainable modes of transportation, such as high-speed trains, maglev systems, or even personal air mobility.
Smart Cities and Infrastructure: Cities of the future will likely be highly integrated and efficient, with smart grids, optimized resource management, and sustainable building designs. Advanced sensors and data analytics could help to monitor and optimize city systems for sustainability.
Biotechnology and Biomimicry: Biotechnology could play a significant role in creating sustainable materials, developing new energy sources, and even cleaning up pollution. Biomimicry, which involves imitating natural processes and designs, could lead to innovative solutions for sustainable technology.

It’s important to remember that these are just speculations based on current trends. The actual sustainable technologies of 4660 could be very different, depending on unforeseen discoveries, innovations, and societal changes. However, the focus on resource efficiency, renewable energy, ecological preservation, and closed-loop systems is likely to remain central to any sustainable technology in the future.

What is Sustainable technology of 4660 ?

It’s impossible to definitively say what “sustainable technology of 4660” will be. Predicting technology even a few decades out is challenging, let alone over 2,600 years. However, we can extrapolate from current trends and imagine what principles and areas of focus might be crucial for sustainability in such a distant future. It’s less about specific gadgets and more about overarching concepts.

Here’s a breakdown of potential areas of focus for sustainable technology in 4660, keeping in mind this is highly speculative:

Extreme Resource Efficiency and Closed-Loop Systems: By 4660, resource scarcity will likely be a critical concern. Technologies will need to operate on closed-loop principles, where waste is virtually eliminated, and all materials are continuously recycled and reused. This likely involves advanced material science capable of breaking down and reforming materials at a molecular level.
Advanced Energy Generation and Distribution: Fossil fuels will be long gone. Sustainable energy sources like solar, wind, geothermal, and perhaps more exotic forms of energy generation (fusion, zero-point energy, or something we can’t even conceive of today) will be dominant. Energy transmission and storage will be highly efficient, possibly involving superconducting grids or entirely new paradigms.
Ecological Restoration and Geoengineering: Centuries of potential environmental change will necessitate sophisticated technologies for restoring and maintaining ecosystems. This could include advanced methods for reforestation, ocean cleanup, and potentially even controlled geoengineering to manage climate and atmospheric conditions.
Sustainable Food Production: Feeding a potentially much larger population sustainably will be a major challenge. Technologies like vertical farming, precision agriculture, lab-grown or cultured foods, and personalized nutrition based on individual biomes could be widespread. Food production will likely be highly localized and resource-efficient.
Advanced Materials and Manufacturing: Nanotechnology and other advanced materials science will likely play a crucial role. Materials might be self-healing, adaptable, or even grown. Manufacturing processes will likely be highly automated and use minimal resources.
Biotechnology and Biomimicry: Biotechnology could be used to create sustainable materials, develop new energy sources, and clean up pollution. Biomimicry, where we imitate natural processes and designs, could lead to innovative solutions for sustainable technology.
Hyper-Efficient Transportation: Transportation will likely be electric and powered by renewable energy. Advanced materials and designs could lead to more efficient and sustainable modes of transportation, such as high-speed rail, maglev systems, or even personal air mobility.
Smart and Adaptive Infrastructure: Cities will likely be highly integrated and efficient, with smart grids, optimized resource management, and sustainable building designs. Infrastructure might be adaptive, able to respond to changing conditions in real-time.
Decentralized and Localized Systems: To maximize resilience and minimize environmental impact, many systems (energy, food production, manufacturing) might be highly decentralized and localized, reducing reliance on large, centralized infrastructure.

It’s important to remember that this is all speculation. The actual sustainable technologies of 4660 could be vastly different. Unforeseen scientific breakthroughs, societal shifts, and even existential threats could drastically alter the course of technological development. However, the core principles of sustainability – resource efficiency, renewable energy, ecological preservation, and minimizing environmental impact – are likely to remain central to any technology that aims to support a thriving civilization in the distant future.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4660 ?

This is a fascinating question that requires some speculation! While we can’t know for sure what society will be like in 4660, we can make some educated guesses about who might need or benefit from sustainable technology in that distant future.

Here are some possibilities:

Humanity (or its descendants): Assuming humans (or a highly evolved version of humans) still exist, they would be the primary beneficiaries. Sustainable technology would be essential for survival and maintaining a high quality of life in a potentially very different world.
Other intelligent species: It’s conceivable that by 4660, humans might have encountered or even evolved into other intelligent species. These beings would also rely on sustainable technology to thrive.
Ecosystems and the planet itself: Sustainable technology isn’t just about benefiting humans. It’s about maintaining the health and balance of the entire planet. In 4660, this could involve sophisticated systems for ecological restoration, climate regulation, and resource management to ensure the long-term viability of Earth’s ecosystems.
Future civilizations: It’s possible that by 4660, human civilization as we know it might have transformed into something entirely different. Perhaps there will be space-faring civilizations, or societies living in vastly different environments. These future civilizations would still need sustainable technology to survive and prosper.
Artificial intelligence or sentient machines: If AI continues to develop, it’s possible that by 4660, there could be sentient machines or AI entities that are deeply integrated into society. These beings would also have a stake in sustainable technology, as they would rely on it for energy, resources, and maintaining their own existence.

It’s important to remember that this is all speculation. The needs and beneficiaries of sustainable technology in 4660 could be very different depending on how society, technology, and even the planet itself evolve over the next 2600 years.

However, one thing is certain: the need for sustainability will likely remain a central concern for any intelligent species or civilization that hopes to thrive in the long term.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4660 ?

That’s a very insightful question! It’s not just who needs sustainable technology in 4660, but when it will be needed. The answer is likely: long before 4660.

Here’s why:

Urgent environmental challenges: Many of the environmental problems we face today, like climate change, resource depletion, and pollution, are likely to worsen in the coming centuries. Sustainable technology will be needed to mitigate these issues and prevent them from reaching catastrophic levels. Waiting until 4660 might be too late.
Evolution of needs: As societies and technologies evolve, new challenges and needs will emerge. Sustainable solutions will be required to address these evolving needs and ensure long-term well-being. This process will likely start long before 4660.
Proactive vs. reactive: Ideally, sustainable technology should be developed and implemented proactively, rather than reactively. This means anticipating future challenges and developing solutions in advance, rather than waiting for crises to occur.
Continuous development: Sustainable technology is not a static concept. It will require continuous innovation and improvement to meet the changing needs of society and the environment. This ongoing development will need to start well before 4660.

In essence, the need for sustainable technology in 4660 will be a culmination of efforts and advancements made over centuries. It’s not a matter of waiting until that distant year, but rather starting now and continuing to innovate and adapt to ensure a sustainable future.

Think of it like building a house. You wouldn’t wait until the day you need to move in to start construction. You would begin long in advance, laying the foundation and gradually building the structure. Similarly, the sustainable technology of 4660 will be built upon the foundation laid by the efforts and innovations of previous generations, starting with the work being done today.

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4660 ?

The question of “where” sustainable technology will be required in 4660 is complex and, of course, speculative. It’s not just about a single location, but rather a pervasive need across multiple domains:

Globally, across the Earth: The most fundamental “where” is the entire planet. Sustainable technology will be necessary to maintain habitable conditions, manage ecosystems, and ensure the availability of resources for all living things. This includes land, oceans, atmosphere, and all interconnected systems.
In human settlements: Whether those are sprawling megacities, smaller eco-villages, or something we can’t even imagine, sustainable technology will be crucial for providing shelter, energy, food, water, and managing waste in a way that minimizes environmental impact. This applies to urban centers, rural areas, and even potentially off-world colonies.
In resource extraction and processing: Even in 4660, some level of resource utilization may be necessary. Sustainable technology will be required to extract and process these resources with minimal environmental damage and maximum efficiency, ideally using closed-loop systems.
In transportation networks: Whether it’s on land, sea, or air (or beyond), sustainable technology will be essential for creating transportation systems that are efficient, powered by renewable energy, and have a minimal carbon footprint.
In communication and information systems: The infrastructure supporting communication and information networks will need to be sustainable, minimizing energy consumption and resource usage.
In space (if applicable): If humanity has expanded beyond Earth by 4660, sustainable technology will be even more critical for establishing and maintaining off-world settlements, exploring new environments, and managing resources in space.
In personal technologies: Even at the individual level, sustainable technology will be integrated into everyday devices and tools, promoting resource efficiency and minimizing environmental impact.
Potentially, in other dimensions or realities: This is highly speculative, but if future science reveals other dimensions or realities, the principles of sustainability might even extend beyond our current understanding of the universe.

In short, the “where” of sustainable technology in 4660 is everywhere. It will need to be integrated into all aspects of life and technology to ensure a thriving and sustainable future. It’s not a question of a specific place, but rather a pervasive principle guiding technological development and application across all domains.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4660 ?

This is a really interesting question! It forces us to think beyond just the what of sustainable technology in 4660, and consider the how – the methods and approaches that will be necessary to create and implement it.

Here are some key aspects of “how” sustainable technology might be required in 4660:

Interdisciplinary collaboration: Developing truly sustainable solutions will require collaboration across a wide range of disciplines, including science, engineering, ecology, social sciences, and even the arts and humanities. Experts from diverse fields will need to work together to create holistic and integrated solutions.
Systems thinking: Sustainable technology will need to be approached with a systems thinking mindset, recognizing the interconnectedness of different systems and the potential for unintended consequences. This means considering the entire lifecycle of technologies, from resource extraction to disposal, and understanding how they interact with the environment and society.
Continuous innovation: Sustainable technology is not a one-time achievement, but rather an ongoing process of innovation and improvement. This will require sustained investment in research and development, as well as mechanisms for adapting to new challenges and opportunities.
Ethical considerations: As technology advances, ethical considerations will become increasingly important. Sustainable technology must be developed and used in a way that is fair, equitable, and respects the rights of all beings, including future generations.
Adaptive management: The world of 4660 will likely be very different from today. Sustainable technology will need to be adaptable and resilient, capable of responding to unexpected changes and challenges. This will require flexible systems and a willingness to learn and adjust course as needed.
Global cooperation: Many environmental challenges are global in nature and will require international cooperation to address. Sustainable technology will need to be developed and shared across borders to ensure a sustainable future for all.
Education and awareness: Creating a sustainable future will require a widespread understanding of environmental issues and the importance of sustainable technology. Education and awareness programs will be essential to empower individuals and communities to make informed choices and participate in the transition to a sustainable society.

In essence, the “how” of sustainable technology in 4660 will be just as important as the “what.” It will require a combination of scientific advancements, interdisciplinary collaboration, ethical considerations, and a commitment to continuous learning and adaptation.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4660 ?

It’s difficult to create a specific case study for sustainable technology in 4660 because we can’t know the exact challenges and solutions that far into the future. However, we can create a hypothetical scenario based on current trends and potential future developments:

Case Study: The Great Lakes Restoration Project – 4660

Background:

By 4660, centuries of industrialization and environmental changes have taken a toll on the Great Lakes ecosystem. Pollution, invasive species, and climate change have severely degraded water quality, biodiversity, and the overall health of the lakes. Recognizing the vital importance of this freshwater resource, a massive restoration project is initiated.

Sustainable Technology Solutions:

Advanced Bioremediation: Nanotechnology-based solutions are deployed to break down pollutants and restore the natural balance of the lake’s microbial communities. Genetically engineered microorganisms are used to target specific contaminants and accelerate the natural cleaning processes.
Smart Ecosystem Monitoring: A network of advanced sensors and AI-powered systems continuously monitors the health of the lakes. This includes real-time tracking of water quality, invasive species, and climate-related changes. The data is used to inform adaptive management strategies and optimize restoration efforts.
Closed-Loop Resource Management: Sustainable technologies are implemented to manage water usage and prevent pollution from entering the lakes. This includes advanced wastewater treatment systems, closed-loop agriculture practices, and the use of biodegradable materials in manufacturing.
Ecological Restoration: Advanced techniques are used to restore native habitats and reintroduce endangered species. This includes creating artificial reefs, restoring wetlands, and using gene editing to enhance the resilience of native species.
Climate Engineering: To mitigate the impacts of climate change, localized climate engineering techniques are employed to regulate water temperatures and precipitation patterns in the Great Lakes region. This could involve cloud seeding, solar radiation management, or other advanced technologies.

Outcomes:

Through the integrated use of these sustainable technologies, the Great Lakes ecosystem is successfully restored. Water quality improves significantly, biodiversity increases, and the lakes become a thriving resource for both humans and the environment. The project serves as a model for ecological restoration efforts around the world and demonstrates the power of sustainable technology to address complex environmental challenges.

Lessons Learned:

This hypothetical case study highlights the importance of:

Long-term vision: Addressing environmental challenges requires a long-term perspective and a commitment to sustained efforts over centuries.
Interdisciplinary collaboration: Solving complex problems requires collaboration across diverse fields of expertise.
Continuous innovation: Sustainable technology must be continuously developed and adapted to meet evolving needs and challenges.
Ethical considerations: Environmental restoration efforts must be guided by ethical principles and a respect for the interconnectedness of ecosystems.

While this is just a speculative scenario, it illustrates how sustainable technology could play a crucial role in addressing environmental challenges and ensuring a healthy planet for future generations.

COURTESY : SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4660 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 4660: Envisioning a Future of Balance

Abstract:

Predicting the specifics of technology 2600 years into the future is inherently speculative. However, by extrapolating current trends, understanding fundamental principles of sustainability, and considering potential future challenges, we can envision a landscape of sustainable technologies in 4660. This white paper explores potential areas of focus, key principles, and the societal context that might shape sustainable technology in this distant future.

1. Introduction:

The year 4660 represents a vast expanse of time, during which human civilization, technology, and the environment will likely undergo profound transformations. This paper explores the potential characteristics of sustainable technology in this distant future, acknowledging the inherent uncertainties while grounding our projections in current trends and fundamental principles of sustainability.

2. Core Principles of Sustainability in 4660:

We can assume that the core principles of sustainability will remain crucial in 4660, perhaps even more so than today. These principles likely include:

Radical Resource Efficiency: Minimizing resource consumption and maximizing reuse and recycling.
Renewable Energy Dominance: Reliance on sustainable energy sources, potentially including technologies we cannot yet imagine.
Ecological Integrity: Maintaining and restoring the health and balance of ecosystems.
Social Equity: Ensuring that the benefits of technology are shared equitably and that environmental burdens are not disproportionately borne by marginalized communities.
Resilience and Adaptability: Developing systems that can withstand environmental changes and adapt to unforeseen challenges.

3. Potential Areas of Focus for Sustainable Technology in 4660:

Based on these principles, several key areas of technological development are likely:

Advanced Material Science: Nanotechnology and other advanced materials will likely enable the creation of highly durable, adaptable, and recyclable materials. “Living materials” with embedded biological components could be used for construction, manufacturing, and even environmental remediation.
Closed-Loop Systems: Circular economies will be essential. Technologies for complete resource recovery, recycling, and reuse will be highly advanced, minimizing waste and pollution.
Energy Generation and Storage: Fusion power, space-based solar energy, or other currently unknown energy sources might provide abundant clean energy. Energy storage solutions will be highly efficient and integrated into all aspects of life.
Biotechnology and Biomimicry: Biotechnology could be used to create sustainable materials, develop new energy sources, and clean up pollution. Biomimicry, imitating nature’s designs and processes, will likely inspire innovative solutions.
Ecological Engineering and Restoration: Technologies for restoring damaged ecosystems and managing natural resources will be crucial. This could include advanced methods for reforestation, ocean cleanup, and climate regulation.
Precision Agriculture and Food Production: Sustainable food production will likely rely on technologies like vertical farming, precision agriculture, and lab-grown or cultured foods to feed a potentially larger population while minimizing environmental impact.
Smart and Adaptive Infrastructure: Cities will likely be highly integrated and efficient, with smart grids, optimized resource management, and sustainable building designs. Infrastructure might be adaptive, able to respond to changing conditions in real-time.
Personalized and Localized Technologies: To minimize transportation needs and promote self-sufficiency, technologies for personalized manufacturing, energy generation, and food production might be widespread.

4. Societal Context:

The development and implementation of sustainable technology in 4660 will be deeply intertwined with the social, political, and economic context of the time. Factors like population size, resource availability, and societal values will all play a crucial role. It’s possible that by 4660, a global consciousness regarding sustainability will be deeply ingrained, driving technological development and policy decisions.

5. Challenges and Opportunities:

Developing sustainable technology for 4660 presents numerous challenges, including:

Predicting future needs and challenges: Anticipating the specific environmental and societal challenges of 4660 is difficult.
Technological limitations: Current scientific understanding and technological capabilities may be insufficient to achieve the level of sustainability required.
Ethical considerations: Advanced technologies raise complex ethical questions that must be addressed carefully.

However, the pursuit of sustainable technology also presents immense opportunities, including:

Creating a thriving and equitable society: Sustainable technology can help ensure a high quality of life for all while preserving the planet for future generations.
Unlocking new scientific frontiers: The quest for sustainable solutions can drive innovation and lead to groundbreaking scientific discoveries.
Building a more resilient future: Sustainable technology can help societies adapt to environmental changes and build a more resilient future.

6. Conclusion:

While predicting the specifics of sustainable technology in 4660 is challenging, we can envision a future where technology plays a crucial role in maintaining ecological balance, ensuring resource availability, and promoting social well-being. By focusing on core principles of sustainability, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, and embracing continuous innovation, we can pave the way for a more sustainable future for generations to come. The journey towards sustainable technology in 4660 begins today, with the choices we make and the actions we take to address the environmental challenges of our time.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4660 ?

It’s fascinating to imagine the industrial applications of sustainable technology in 4660! Here are some possibilities, extrapolating from current trends and considering the potential needs of a future society:

1. Advanced Materials Production:

Nanofactories: Imagine miniature, self-contained factories that can manipulate matter at the atomic level to create any material needed, on demand. These could be powered by renewable energy and use recycled or readily available resources.
Bio-integrated Manufacturing: Combining biological processes with industrial manufacturing. Imagine growing materials with desired properties, like super-strong fibers or self-healing composites, using engineered organisms or plant-based systems.

2. Energy Generation and Distribution:

Space-Based Solar Power: Massive solar arrays in orbit could beam clean energy to Earth, providing a constant and abundant source of power.
Fusion Power Plants: If fusion energy becomes a reality, it could provide a safe and sustainable source of energy for industrial processes.
Global Energy Grid: A highly efficient and intelligent energy grid could distribute power from various renewable sources to industrial facilities around the world, minimizing transmission losses.

3. Resource Management and Recycling:

Closed-Loop Recycling Systems: Industrial processes could operate on closed-loop principles, where all materials are continuously recycled and reused, eliminating waste.
Resource Extraction from Waste: Advanced technologies could extract valuable resources from waste materials, turning waste into a source of raw materials for industry.

4. Manufacturing and Production:

Additive Manufacturing (4D Printing): 3D printing could evolve into 4D printing, where objects can change shape or properties over time in response to stimuli. This could revolutionize manufacturing, allowing for the creation of adaptable and customizable products.
AI-Powered Automation: Highly advanced AI systems could manage and optimize industrial processes, minimizing energy consumption and resource usage.
Localized Production: To reduce transportation needs and promote self-sufficiency, manufacturing facilities could be highly localized, producing goods closer to where they are needed.

5. Environmental Remediation and Restoration:

Pollution Capture and Conversion: Nanotechnology-based solutions could capture pollutants from industrial emissions and convert them into useful materials or energy.
Ecosystem Restoration: Industrial processes could be used to restore damaged ecosystems, such as reforesting areas, cleaning up polluted waterways, or even reversing desertification.

6. Transportation and Logistics:

Sustainable Transportation Networks: Industrial goods could be transported using electric vehicles powered by renewable energy, or even more advanced modes of transportation like maglev trains or autonomous airships.
Smart Logistics Systems: AI-powered systems could optimize logistics and supply chains, minimizing transportation distances and energy consumption.

7. Biotechnology and Agriculture:

Sustainable Agriculture: Industrial-scale agriculture could use precision farming techniques, vertical farms, and other sustainable technologies to maximize food production while minimizing environmental impact.
Biomanufacturing: Industrial processes could use biological systems to produce a wide range of products, from pharmaceuticals to biofuels to biodegradable plastics.

Important Considerations:

Ethical implications: As with any technology, it’s crucial to consider the ethical implications of these advanced industrial applications. Ensuring that these technologies are used responsibly and for the benefit of all will be paramount.
Social impact: The shift towards sustainable industry could have significant social impacts, such as changes in employment patterns. It will be important to manage these transitions in a way that is just and equitable.

By combining ingenuity, scientific advancements, and a deep commitment to sustainability, the industrial landscape of 4660 could be transformed into a model of efficiency, ecological balance, and responsible resource management.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4660 ?

Research and development (R&D) of sustainable technology for 4660 is a fascinating thought experiment! It’s not just about inventing new gadgets, but about fundamentally rethinking our relationship with resources and the environment. Here’s how R&D in this field might look:

1. Interdisciplinary and Collaborative Approach:

Global Research Network: Imagine a vast, interconnected network of scientists, engineers, ecologists, social scientists, and even artists and philosophers working together across the globe. This network would foster collaboration and accelerate the pace of innovation.
Living Labs: Entire communities or regions could become “living laboratories” where new sustainable technologies are tested and refined in real-world settings.
Citizen Science: Individuals could play a more active role in R&D, contributing data, ideas, and even helping to develop and test new technologies.

2. Focus Areas:

Fundamental Science:
- New Energy Sources: Exploring theoretical physics to discover new forms of energy generation, perhaps harnessing zero-point energy or manipulating spacetime itself.
- Material Science Breakthroughs: Developing materials with unprecedented properties, like self-healing, adaptability, or even the ability to grow themselves.
- Understanding Complex Systems: Deeply studying ecological systems and the interconnectedness of nature to inform sustainable design and engineering.
Technological Innovation:
- Nanotechnology and Biotechnology: Combining these fields to create “living materials” or microscopic robots that can perform complex tasks like cleaning up pollution or building structures at the molecular level.
- Advanced AI and Machine Learning: Developing AI systems that can optimize resource usage, manage complex ecosystems, and even design new sustainable technologies.
- Closed-Loop Systems: Creating technologies that can completely recycle and reuse all resources, eliminating waste and pollution.
Social and Ethical Considerations:
- Sustainable Behavior: Studying human behavior and developing strategies to promote sustainable lifestyles and consumption patterns.
- Ethical Frameworks: Establishing ethical guidelines for the development and use of advanced technologies, ensuring they are used responsibly and for the benefit of all.

3. R&D Methods:

Predictive Modeling: Using advanced simulations and AI to model future environmental challenges and test the effectiveness of potential solutions.
Biomimicry: Studying nature’s designs and processes to inspire new sustainable technologies.
Open-Source Innovation: Sharing research findings and technological designs openly to accelerate progress and encourage collaboration.

4. Long-Term Vision:

Generational Research: Recognizing that some challenges may take centuries to solve, establishing research programs that can span generations, with knowledge and expertise passed down through time.
“Moonshot” Projects: Launching ambitious, long-term projects with the goal of achieving seemingly impossible feats, like completely reversing climate change or creating truly sustainable cities.

5. Funding and Resources:

Global Investment: Establishing international funding mechanisms to support long-term sustainable technology research.
Resource Allocation: Prioritizing research that addresses the most pressing environmental and social challenges.

It’s important to remember that R&D for 4660 is not just about solving problems; it’s about creating a fundamentally different way of living and interacting with the planet. It’s about building a future where technology and nature are in harmony, and where humanity can thrive for millennia to come.

COURTESY : TURILYTIX

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.