Sustainable technology of 4630

81 / 100

Sustainable technology of 4630 ?

It seems like you might be asking about sustainable technology in the year 4630. While it’s difficult to predict the future with certainty, we can make some educated guesses about what sustainable technology might look like that far in the future.

Here are some possibilities:

Advanced energy sources: By 4630, we might have harnessed new forms of energy that are far more efficient and sustainable than anything we use today. This could include things like zero-point energy, or perhaps we’ll have mastered nuclear fusion to a degree that makes it completely safe and sustainable.
Closed-loop systems: In a truly sustainable future, we would likely have developed closed-loop systems for everything from resource extraction to manufacturing to waste disposal. This would mean that all materials are constantly recycled and reused, minimizing waste and environmental impact.
Biotechnology: Biotechnology could play a major role in creating sustainable solutions in 4630. We might see things like genetically engineered crops that require minimal resources to grow, or bacteria that can break down pollutants and clean up the environment.
Artificial intelligence: AI could be used to optimize everything from energy grids to transportation systems to agriculture, making them more efficient and sustainable.
Space colonization: By 4630, we might have expanded our presence in space, which could provide access to new resources and alleviate pressure on Earth’s ecosystems.

Of course, this is just speculation. The actual sustainable technologies of 4630 could be very different from anything we can imagine today. But one thing is certain: if humanity is still around in 4630, it will likely be because we have found ways to live in a more sustainable way.

Here are some additional resources that you might find interesting:

I hope this helps!

What is Sustainable technology of 4630 ?

Unfortunately, it’s impossible to say for sure what sustainable technology will look like in 4630. That’s over 2,600 years in the future! However, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and our understanding of the universe.

Here are some possibilities for sustainable technology in 4630:

Energy:
- Zero-point energy: This is a hypothetical energy source that taps into the energy of the quantum vacuum. If we could harness it, it would be a clean and limitless source of power.
- Advanced fusion power: Nuclear fusion is the process that powers the sun. If we could perfect it, it would be a safe and sustainable way to generate energy.
- Space-based solar power: We could collect solar energy in space and beam it down to Earth. This would be a way to get around the limitations of solar power on Earth, such as weather and nighttime.
Materials:
- Self-healing materials: These materials could repair themselves when damaged, which would reduce waste and the need for repairs.
- Programmable matter: This is matter that can be programmed to change its shape and properties. It could be used to create anything from tools to buildings to food.
- Biomanufacturing: This is the use of biological systems to produce materials. It could be used to create sustainable alternatives to traditional materials like plastics and concrete.
Environment:
- Atmospheric carbon capture: This is a technology that removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. It could be used to combat climate change.
- Ocean cleanup: We could develop technologies to remove plastic and other pollution from the oceans.
- Ecosystem restoration: We could use technology to restore damaged ecosystems, such as forests and coral reefs.
Other possibilities:
- Artificial intelligence: AI could be used to optimize everything from energy grids to transportation systems to agriculture, making them more efficient and sustainable.
- Space colonization: By 4630, we may have expanded our presence in space, which could provide access to new resources and alleviate pressure on Earth’s ecosystems.

It’s also important to remember that technology is only one part of the equation. To create a truly sustainable future, we will also need to make changes to our social, economic, and political systems.

I hope this gives you some food for thought!

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4630 ?

It’s more accurate to say that sustainable technology in 4630 will be essential for everyone. Here’s why:

Resource scarcity: Even with advanced technology, resources are finite. By 4630, we may have depleted many easily accessible resources. Sustainable technology will be crucial for efficiently using and recycling what remains.
Environmental limits: Climate change and pollution will likely continue to be major challenges. Sustainable technology will be necessary to mitigate these problems and maintain a habitable planet.
Economic viability: In the long run, unsustainable practices are economically unsustainable. Sustainable technology will be needed to create a circular economy where resources are used efficiently and waste is minimized.
Social equity: Sustainable technology can help ensure that everyone has access to basic necessities like clean water, food, and energy. It can also help reduce inequality by creating new economic opportunities.

While everyone will benefit from sustainable technology, some groups may have a greater need for it:

Developing countries: These countries are often more vulnerable to the effects of climate change and resource scarcity. Sustainable technology can help them adapt to these challenges and improve their quality of life.
Marginalized communities: These communities often have less access to resources and are more likely to be exposed to pollution. Sustainable technology can help them overcome these challenges and improve their health and well-being.

Ultimately, sustainable technology in 4630 will be a necessity for human survival and prosperity. It will require a global effort to develop and implement these technologies in a way that is equitable and sustainable.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4630 ?

That’s a very interesting question! It’s not just about when sustainable technology will be required in 4630, but rather understanding that it will be an ongoing and evolving need.

Here’s a breakdown of why:

Continuous Adaptation: The environment and our understanding of it are constantly changing. What is considered “sustainable” in 4630 will likely be very different from what we consider sustainable today. So, the need for developing and adapting sustainable technology will be continuous.
Long-term Challenges: Issues like climate change, resource depletion, and pollution won’t magically disappear. Even with advanced technology, we’ll need to constantly refine our solutions and find new ways to minimize our impact on the planet.
Maintaining Balance: Sustainable technology isn’t just about solving problems; it’s about maintaining a delicate balance between human needs and the health of the planet. This requires ongoing effort and innovation to ensure that future generations can thrive.

Therefore, it’s not a matter of when sustainable technology will be required in 4630, but rather understanding that it will be an essential and ever-evolving part of life.

Think of it like this: We need to maintain our bodies through healthy habits like eating well and exercising. It’s not something we do once and then we’re done. It’s an ongoing process of adapting to our needs and maintaining our well-being. Similarly, sustainable technology will be an ongoing process of adapting to the needs of humanity and the planet.

In essence, sustainable technology in 4630 will be a testament to humanity’s commitment to long-term survival and prosperity, requiring constant innovation and adaptation to meet the challenges of a changing world.

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4630 ?

Sustainable technology in 4630 will be required everywhere on Earth, and potentially even beyond. Here’s why:

Global Interconnectedness: Environmental problems don’t respect borders. Pollution, climate change, and resource depletion affect the entire planet. Therefore, sustainable solutions will be needed globally, from the smallest village to the largest city.
Diverse Environments: Different regions have unique ecosystems and challenges. Sustainable technologies will need to be adapted to specific environments, whether it’s the desert, the rainforest, the arctic, or the deep ocean.
Human Habitats: Sustainable technology will be crucial in all human habitats, including:
- Urban areas: Cities will need sustainable solutions for energy, transportation, waste management, and resource consumption.
- Rural areas: Sustainable agriculture, water management, and energy access will be essential for rural communities.
- Remote locations: Isolated communities will need sustainable technologies to meet their basic needs and maintain their way of life.
Beyond Earth: By 4630, humanity might have established settlements on other planets or in space. These off-world colonies would rely heavily on sustainable technology for survival, including closed-loop life support systems, resource extraction, and energy generation.

In short, the need for sustainable technology in 4630 will be universal. It will be woven into the fabric of human civilization, wherever it exists. It won’t be confined to specific locations but rather a fundamental requirement for a thriving and enduring future.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4630 ?

The “how” of sustainable technology in 4630 is, of course, speculative, but we can imagine some key characteristics and approaches:

Integration and Interconnectedness: Sustainable technologies will likely be highly integrated, working together seamlessly. For example, energy systems might be linked to transportation and agriculture, creating closed-loop systems that minimize waste and maximize efficiency.
Advanced Materials and Manufacturing: We can expect advanced materials with self-healing properties, biodegradability, or the ability to be easily recycled. Manufacturing processes will likely be highly efficient and use minimal resources. Perhaps even programmable matter will be a reality.
Biomimicry and Biotechnology: Learning from nature will be crucial. Sustainable technologies might mimic natural processes, like photosynthesis for energy production or the way ecosystems recycle nutrients. Biotechnology could play a major role in creating sustainable materials, fuels, and even food.
Artificial Intelligence and Automation: AI will likely be deeply integrated into sustainable systems, optimizing everything from energy grids to resource management. Automation will play a role in manufacturing, agriculture, and waste management, making these processes more efficient and sustainable.
Decentralization and Localization: While some large-scale infrastructure might still exist, we could see a trend towards more decentralized and localized systems. This could mean communities generating their own energy, growing their own food, and managing their own resources.
Circular Economy Principles: The concept of a circular economy, where resources are constantly reused and recycled, will be central. Products will be designed for disassembly and reuse, minimizing waste and pollution.
Global Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing: Developing and implementing sustainable technology will require global collaboration and knowledge sharing. Scientists, engineers, and policymakers from around the world will need to work together to address the challenges of sustainability.
Ethical Considerations: As technology advances, ethical considerations will become even more important. We’ll need to ensure that sustainable technologies are developed and used in a way that is fair, equitable, and respects the rights of all people and the planet.

It’s important to remember that the “how” of sustainable technology in 4630 will be a product of continuous innovation, adaptation, and a deep commitment to creating a thriving and sustainable future. It will be a testament to human ingenuity and our ability to learn from the past and adapt to the challenges of the future.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4630 ?

It’s tricky to create a specific case study for sustainable technology in 4630, as it’s so far in the future. But, we can build a hypothetical scenario based on the trends and possibilities we’ve discussed. Here’s an attempt:

Case Study: The Integrated City of Aurora – 4630

Background: By 4630, humanity has expanded beyond Earth, with thriving settlements on Mars and other celestial bodies. However, Earth remains a vital hub, and the city of Aurora serves as a model for sustainable urban living.

Technology Focus: Aurora is a self-sustaining city powered by a combination of advanced fusion reactors and space-based solar energy. It utilizes a closed-loop resource system, where all materials are continuously recycled and reused.

Key Features:

Energy: Aurora’s primary energy source is a network of compact fusion reactors, providing clean and abundant power. Space-based solar arrays supplement this, beaming energy down to the city.
Materials: Buildings are constructed from self-healing, bio-degradable materials grown through advanced bio-manufacturing. These materials can adapt to changing needs and automatically repair any damage.
Food: Vertical farms and hydroponic gardens within Aurora produce a variety of nutrient-rich food. Advanced agricultural techniques minimize water and resource usage.
Waste Management: Aurora operates on a zero-waste system. All waste is processed and transformed back into usable resources, feeding back into the city’s systems.
Transportation: Personal transportation is largely automated and electric, seamlessly integrated with the city’s energy grid. Advanced AI optimizes traffic flow and minimizes congestion.
Environment: Aurora is designed to coexist with nature. Green spaces and natural ecosystems are integrated into the city, promoting biodiversity and providing residents with access to nature.

Challenges and Solutions:

Resource limitations: Even with advanced recycling, some resources are finite. Aurora has developed partnerships with off-world colonies to sustainably source rare materials.
Environmental changes: Climate change continues to be a factor. Aurora has adapted by building resilient infrastructure and utilizing atmospheric carbon capture technologies.
Social equity: Ensuring access to resources and technology for all residents is a priority. Aurora has implemented programs to promote education and equal opportunity.

Outcomes:

Environmental sustainability: Aurora has a minimal environmental footprint, contributing to the health of the planet.
Economic prosperity: The city’s efficient resource use and advanced technology drive a thriving economy.
High quality of life: Aurora’s residents enjoy a high quality of life with access to clean energy, nutritious food, and a healthy environment.

Lessons Learned:

Long-term vision: Aurora’s success is a result of long-term planning and a commitment to sustainability.
Technological innovation: Continuous innovation is crucial for developing and adapting sustainable solutions.
Global cooperation: Addressing global challenges requires collaboration and knowledge sharing.
Ethical considerations: Sustainable technology must be developed and used in a way that is ethical and equitable.

This case study highlights the potential for sustainable technology to create thriving and resilient societies in the future. It demonstrates that by embracing innovation, collaboration, and a long-term vision, humanity can overcome the challenges of the 21st century and beyond.

Remember, this is just a hypothetical example. The actual sustainable technologies of 4630 could be very different. But, it gives us a framework for thinking about the possibilities and the importance of sustainable practices for the future.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4630 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 4630: Envisioning a Future of Balance

Abstract:

Predicting the specifics of technology 2600 years into the future is inherently speculative. However, by extrapolating current trends, understanding fundamental scientific principles, and considering the long-term challenges humanity faces, we can construct a plausible vision of sustainable technology in 4630. This white paper explores potential advancements in energy, materials, environment, and societal structures, emphasizing the interconnectedness and adaptability necessary for a thriving future.

1. Introduction:

The pursuit of sustainability is a continuous journey, not a destination. By 4630, humanity will likely have navigated centuries of environmental and societal shifts. This paper assumes that survival and progress will have necessitated a profound shift towards sustainable practices across all aspects of life. We posit that technological advancement will be a crucial driver of this transformation.

2. Energy:

The energy landscape of 4630 will likely be dominated by sources we can only dream of today:

Harnessing Zero-Point Energy: While still theoretical, the potential of extracting energy from the quantum vacuum could provide a virtually limitless and clean power source. Significant breakthroughs in fundamental physics would be required.
Advanced Fusion Power: Controlled nuclear fusion, perfected over centuries, could offer another clean and abundant energy source. Improvements in plasma confinement and materials science would be essential.
Space-Based Energy Collection: Large-scale orbital platforms could collect solar energy and beam it to Earth or other settlements, bypassing atmospheric limitations and providing consistent power.

3. Materials:

Sustainable materials will be fundamental to a circular economy:

Programmable Matter: Nanotechnology could allow for the creation of materials that can be reconfigured at the atomic level, enabling on-demand creation of tools, structures, and even food.
Bio-Integrated Materials: Materials grown using biological processes could be designed to be biodegradable, self-healing, and adaptable to specific needs.
Advanced Recycling and Resource Recovery: Closed-loop recycling systems will be ubiquitous, ensuring that virtually no material is wasted. Advanced AI will manage resource flows and optimize recycling processes.

4. Environment:

Restoring and maintaining a healthy planet will be a central focus:

Atmospheric Carbon Capture and Geoengineering: Advanced technologies will actively remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere and mitigate the effects of climate change. Geoengineering techniques, if employed, will be carefully managed to minimize unintended consequences.
Ecosystem Restoration: Biotechnology and ecological engineering will be used to restore damaged ecosystems and promote biodiversity.
Ocean Revitalization: Technologies will be developed to clean up pollution, restore marine ecosystems, and manage ocean resources sustainably.

5. Society and Infrastructure:

Sustainable technology will be integrated into all aspects of society:

Smart Cities and Infrastructure: Urban centers will be optimized for resource efficiency, with integrated systems for energy, transportation, waste management, and communication. AI will play a key role in managing these complex systems.
Decentralized Production and Consumption: Communities will have greater control over their resources, with localized systems for energy generation, food production, and manufacturing.
Global Collaboration and Governance: International cooperation will be essential for addressing global challenges and ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies.

6. Challenges and Considerations:

Ethical Implications: The development and deployment of advanced technologies will require careful consideration of ethical implications, including potential risks and unintended consequences.
Resource Management: Even with advanced recycling, careful management of resources will be crucial to ensure long-term sustainability.
Social Equity: Ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies and resources will be essential for promoting social justice and preventing inequality.

7. Conclusion:

The sustainable technology of 4630 will be a product of centuries of innovation, adaptation, and a deep commitment to creating a thriving future for humanity and the planet. It will be characterized by interconnected systems, advanced materials, and a focus on ecological balance. While the specifics remain speculative, the underlying principles of sustainability – resource efficiency, environmental stewardship, and social equity – will guide technological development and shape the future of human civilization. Continuous research, ethical considerations, and global collaboration will be crucial for realizing this vision.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4630 ?

It’s fascinating to imagine the industrial applications of sustainable technology in 4630! Here are some possibilities, keeping in mind this is highly speculative:

1. Advanced Manufacturing:

Programmable Matter Factories: Imagine factories that can produce a wide range of products on demand, using programmable matter. These factories could reconfigure themselves to create anything from tools and electronics to building materials and even food, minimizing waste and resource needs.
Bio-Integrated Production: Industrial processes might utilize bio-integrated systems, where living organisms or biological processes are used to create materials, pharmaceuticals, or other products. This could lead to highly efficient and sustainable manufacturing with minimal environmental impact.
Closed-Loop Production Systems: Factories would operate on closed-loop principles, where all waste is recycled and reused within the production process. This would eliminate the concept of industrial waste and create a truly circular economy.

2. Resource Extraction and Processing:

Sustainable Mining: Mining operations could utilize advanced robotics and AI to extract resources with minimal environmental disruption. Self-healing materials and bioremediation techniques could be used to restore mined areas.
Asteroid Mining: By 4630, asteroid mining might be a common practice. Sustainable technologies would be crucial for extracting resources from asteroids in a way that minimizes space debris and environmental impact.
Advanced Material Refining: New technologies could allow for the efficient and sustainable refining of raw materials, minimizing energy consumption and waste generation.

3. Energy Production and Distribution:

Fusion Power Plants: Fusion reactors would provide clean and abundant energy for industrial processes. These plants would be highly efficient and safe, with minimal risk of accidents or radioactive waste.
Space-Based Energy Infrastructure: Large-scale orbital platforms could collect solar energy and beam it down to industrial facilities, providing a consistent and sustainable power source.
Smart Energy Grids: AI-powered energy grids would optimize energy distribution and usage, ensuring that industrial facilities have access to the power they need while minimizing waste and maximizing efficiency.

4. Transportation and Logistics:

Autonomous Electric Vehicles: Industrial transportation would rely on autonomous electric vehicles powered by sustainable energy sources. These vehicles would be seamlessly integrated with smart logistics systems, optimizing routes and minimizing fuel consumption.
Hyperloop Networks: High-speed hyperloop networks could transport goods and materials between industrial facilities quickly and efficiently, reducing transportation times and energy usage.
Drone Delivery: Drones could be used for last-mile delivery of goods, reducing traffic congestion and emissions in urban areas.

5. Agriculture and Food Production:

Vertical Farms and Hydroponics: Industrial-scale vertical farms and hydroponic systems could produce food in urban areas, minimizing transportation costs and environmental impact.
Precision Agriculture: AI and robotics could be used to optimize agricultural practices, reducing water and fertilizer usage while maximizing yields.
Sustainable Food Processing: Food processing facilities would utilize sustainable technologies to minimize waste and energy consumption, creating nutritious and environmentally friendly food products.

6. Environmental Remediation:

Atmospheric Carbon Capture: Industrial facilities could utilize advanced carbon capture technologies to remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, mitigating climate change.
Pollution Remediation: Biotechnology and nanotechnology could be used to clean up pollution from industrial sites and restore damaged ecosystems.
Waste Management and Recycling: Advanced recycling and waste management systems would be integrated into industrial processes, ensuring that all waste is reused or recycled.

These are just a few examples of the many ways in which sustainable technology could be applied in industry in 4630. The key is that sustainability would be deeply ingrained in all aspects of industrial activity, from resource extraction to manufacturing to transportation and waste management. This would create a truly circular economy where industry operates in harmony with the environment, ensuring a healthy planet for future generations.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4630 ?

Research and development (R&D) in sustainable technology for 4630 would be a monumental, ongoing, and globally collaborative effort. While we can’t know the specifics, we can imagine the general direction and structure:

1. Global Research Consortiums:

Interdisciplinary Teams: Massive, interdisciplinary teams of scientists, engineers, social scientists, and ethicists would work together in global research consortiums. These teams would tackle complex challenges related to energy, materials, environment, and social systems.
Open-Source Collaboration: A strong emphasis on open-source collaboration and knowledge sharing would accelerate progress and ensure that research benefits all of humanity. International agreements would facilitate this exchange.
Long-Term Funding: Governments, corporations, and philanthropic organizations would commit to long-term funding for sustainable technology research, recognizing that these investments are crucial for the future of civilization.

2. Key Research Areas:

Fundamental Science: Continued exploration of fundamental physics, chemistry, and biology would be essential for discovering new energy sources, materials, and processes. This might include research into zero-point energy, advanced fusion, and the nature of consciousness.
Advanced Materials Science: Developing new materials with desired properties (self-healing, biodegradable, programmable) would be a major focus. This could involve nanotechnology, biomimicry, and materials informatics.
Biotechnology and Bioengineering: Harnessing the power of biology for sustainable solutions would be crucial. This could include developing bio-integrated materials, engineering microbes for bioremediation, and creating sustainable food production systems.
Artificial Intelligence and Complex Systems: AI would play a central role in optimizing complex systems, from energy grids to resource management. Research would focus on developing AI algorithms that can learn, adapt, and make decisions in a sustainable way.
Social and Ethical Dimensions: Research would also explore the social and ethical implications of sustainable technologies. This would include studying how to ensure equitable access to resources, prevent unintended consequences, and promote social justice.

3. Research Infrastructure:

Advanced Laboratories and Facilities: Large-scale research facilities would be built to support cutting-edge experiments and simulations. These facilities might include advanced materials characterization labs, bioengineering facilities, and high-performance computing centers.
Living Laboratories: Cities and communities could serve as “living laboratories” for testing and demonstrating sustainable technologies in real-world settings.
Global Sensor Networks: A vast network of sensors would monitor the environment and collect data on resource usage, pollution levels, and other key indicators. This data would be used to inform research and policy decisions.

4. Education and Training:

Interdisciplinary Education: Education programs would train scientists and engineers in interdisciplinary approaches to sustainable technology.
Lifelong Learning: Recognizing that technology is constantly evolving, lifelong learning would be essential for staying at the forefront of sustainable innovation.

5. Iterative Development and Adaptation:

Rapid Prototyping and Testing: New technologies would be rapidly prototyped and tested in simulated and real-world environments.
Continuous Improvement: Sustainable technologies would be continuously improved and adapted based on feedback from research, monitoring, and real-world experience.

6. International Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer:

Global Research Networks: Researchers from around the world would collaborate on joint projects and share their findings through conferences, publications, and open-source platforms.
Technology Transfer Programs: Programs would be established to facilitate the transfer of sustainable technologies from research labs to industry and communities.

The R&D landscape for sustainable technology in 4630 would be dynamic, adaptive, and driven by a shared commitment to creating a thriving future for all. It would be a testament to human ingenuity and our ability to learn, innovate, and collaborate on a global scale.

COURTESY : TBD Media Group

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.