Leave a Comment / Blog, Sustainable technology of 4620 / By
79 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

Sustainable technology of 4620 ?

It seems like “4620” could be a reference to a few different things:

  • ENV 4620 – Envision Sustainable Communities: This is a course at the University of South Florida that explores how infrastructure projects can be designed to be more sustainable and equitable. It reviews the Envision™ rating system and applies it to real-world projects.
  • Mundra Thermal Power Plant: This power plant in India has a capacity of 4620 MW. It uses both subcritical and supercritical technology, with the latter being more efficient and sustainable. The plant has received recognition for its sustainability efforts, including certification from the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
  • GAT-4620: This is a ceiling speaker model by Fonestar that is designed for background music and voice announcements in 100V line installations. It is marketed as having excellent sound quality and an elegant design.

Without more context, it’s difficult to say which of these is the most relevant to your question. If you could provide more information about what you’re interested in, I can give you a more specific answer.

In general, sustainable technology refers to any technology that is designed to minimize its negative impact on the environment. This can include things like renewable energy sources, energy-efficient appliances, and sustainable transportation systems.

Here are some examples of sustainable technologies that are being developed and used around the world:

  • Solar power: Solar panels convert sunlight into electricity, which can be used to power homes and businesses. Solar power is a renewable energy source that does not produce greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Wind power: Wind turbines convert the kinetic energy of wind into electricity. Wind power is another renewable energy source that does not produce greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Electric vehicles: Electric vehicles (EVs) are powered by batteries instead of gasoline. EVs produce zero tailpipe emissions, which helps to reduce air pollution.
  • Sustainable agriculture: Sustainable agriculture practices are designed to minimize the environmental impact of farming. This can include things like using less water, reducing the use of pesticides, and planting cover crops to improve soil health.
  • Green building: Green buildings are designed to minimize their environmental impact. This can include things like using energy-efficient materials, installing solar panels, and harvesting rainwater.

These are just a few examples of the many sustainable technologies that are being developed and used around the world. As technology continues to advance, we can expect to see even more innovative solutions to the challenges of climate change and environmental degradation.

What is Sustainable technology of 4620 ?

Unfortunately, “4620” doesn’t have a widely recognized association with a specific sustainable technology. It’s possible that:

  • It’s a very specific or niche technology: There might be a technology with this designation, but it’s not commonly known or easily searchable.
  • It’s a code or reference: “4620” could be a code for a project, a specific material, or a standard within a larger field of sustainable technology.
  • It’s a misremembered or incomplete term: There might be a similar number or term that’s more widely recognized.

To help me understand what you’re looking for, could you provide more context? For example:

  • Where did you encounter this term? (e.g., a website, a book, a conversation)
  • What kind of sustainable technology are you interested in? (e.g., energy, agriculture, materials)
  • Do you have any other information about this technology? (e.g., its purpose, its components, its developers)

With more information, I might be able to identify the technology you’re interested in or suggest some related sustainable technologies.

In the meantime, here are some general examples of sustainable technologies across different fields:

  • Renewable Energy: Solar photovoltaic cells, wind turbines, hydropower systems, geothermal energy plants, biomass energy technologies.
  • Energy Efficiency: LED lighting, high-efficiency appliances, smart grids, building insulation, energy-efficient transportation.
  • Sustainable Agriculture: Precision agriculture, organic farming, vertical farming, hydroponics, aquaponics, conservation tillage.
  • Sustainable Materials: Recycled materials, bio-based plastics, bamboo, hemp, sustainable timber, low-carbon concrete.
  • Water Management: Water-efficient irrigation, rainwater harvesting, greywater recycling, desalination technologies.

I’m ready to assist further once you provide more details about “sustainable technology of 4620.”

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4620 ?

Unfortunately, with the information I have, I can’t definitively say who is required to use “sustainable technology of 4620”.

Here’s why:

  • Lack of Definition: As we discussed earlier, “sustainable technology of 4620” isn’t a recognized term. It’s unclear what specific technology or standard it refers to.
  • Context is Key: Requirements for sustainable technology depend heavily on the context. This includes factors like:
    • Industry: Different industries have different regulations and sustainability goals.
    • Location: Laws and policies regarding sustainable technology vary by region.
    • Project: The specific project or initiative will dictate the relevant technologies and standards.

However, I can offer some general insights:

  • Sustainability is Increasingly Important: In today’s world, sustainability is becoming a crucial factor for many organizations and individuals. There’s a growing push to adopt sustainable practices and technologies across various sectors.
  • Potential Requirements: Depending on what “sustainable technology of 4620” refers to, it could be required by:
    • Governments: Through regulations, building codes, or environmental standards.
    • Organizations: Companies may mandate the use of certain sustainable technologies within their operations or supply chains.
    • Consumers: Growing consumer demand for eco-friendly products and services can drive the adoption of sustainable technologies.

To help me understand who might be required to use this technology, please provide more information:

  • What do you think “sustainable technology of 4620” refers to? (e.g., a specific type of technology, a standard, a project)
  • What is the context you’re interested in? (e.g., a specific industry, a type of project, a location)

With more details, I can give you a more relevant answer about potential requirements.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4620 ?

As we’ve discussed, “sustainable technology of 4620” isn’t a recognized term, so there’s no official requirement for anyone to use it. It’s likely a misremembered term, a very niche reference, or a code within a specific context.

Since we can’t pinpoint what “4620” refers to, I can only talk about who might be required to use some form of sustainable technology in general. The answer depends entirely on the context. Here are some examples:

  • Businesses: Depending on the industry and location, businesses might be required to adopt sustainable technologies to:
    • Comply with environmental regulations (e.g., emissions limits, waste disposal).
    • Meet building codes that mandate energy efficiency.
    • Gain certifications (e.g., LEED certification for buildings).
    • Respond to consumer demand for sustainable products and practices.
    • Reduce operating costs through energy efficiency and resource conservation.
  • Individuals: Individuals might be required or encouraged to use sustainable technologies through:
    • Building codes that promote energy-efficient homes.
    • Incentives for purchasing electric vehicles or renewable energy systems.
    • Regulations regarding waste disposal and recycling.
    • General awareness and social pressure to adopt sustainable lifestyles.
  • Governments: Governments at all levels (local, regional, national) are increasingly incorporating sustainable technology requirements into:
    • Infrastructure projects (e.g., renewable energy integration, sustainable transportation).
    • Public procurement policies (e.g., favoring eco-friendly products).
    • Regulations and standards for various industries.
  • Specific Industries: Certain industries are more heavily regulated regarding sustainability, such as:
    • Energy (renewable energy mandates).
    • Construction (green building codes).
    • Agriculture (sustainable farming practices).
    • Manufacturing (waste reduction, resource efficiency).

In short: No one is specifically required to use “sustainable technology of 4620” because it’s not a defined term. However, many different entities are required or incentivized to use various sustainable technologies depending on their circumstances.

If you can remember any other details about where you encountered this term or what it might relate to, I might be able to offer more specific guidance. For example, even a vague idea of the industry or type of technology involved would be helpful.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4620 ?

Unfortunately, since “sustainable technology of 4620” is not a recognized term, I cannot give you a specific answer about when it is required.

However, I can provide some general information about when sustainable technologies are typically required:

  • Regulations and Laws: Governments often mandate the use of certain sustainable technologies through:
    • Environmental regulations (e.g., emissions standards for vehicles or factories)
    • Building codes (e.g., energy efficiency requirements for new construction)
    • Product standards (e.g., energy efficiency labels for appliances)
  • Industry Standards and Certifications: Many industries have adopted voluntary sustainability standards or certifications that encourage or require the use of specific technologies. Examples include:
    • LEED certification for green buildings
    • Energy Star certification for appliances
    • Sustainable forestry certifications
  • Project Requirements: Some projects may require the use of sustainable technologies due to:
    • Funding requirements (e.g., grants or loans with sustainability criteria)
    • Client demands (e.g., businesses seeking eco-friendly products or services)
    • Company policies (e.g., internal sustainability goals)
  • Market Forces: Consumer demand for sustainable products and services can drive the adoption of sustainable technologies. Companies may choose to use these technologies to:
    • Attract customers
    • Enhance their brand image
    • Gain a competitive advantage

In general, the use of sustainable technologies is becoming increasingly common due to:

  • Growing awareness of environmental issues
  • Increasing government regulations
  • Advancements in sustainable technology
  • Economic benefits (e.g., cost savings from energy efficiency)

While I cannot tell you when “sustainable technology of 4620” is required, I hope this general information is helpful. If you can provide any additional details about the term or its context, I may be able to give you a more specific answer.

COURTESY : TBD Media Group

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4620 ?

As we’ve established, “sustainable technology of 4620” isn’t a recognized term, so it’s not required anywhere specifically. It’s likely a misremembered term, a very niche reference, or a code within a very specific context.

Since we can’t define what “4620” refers to, the best I can do is give you examples of where various sustainable technologies might be required, depending on regulations, industry practices, and other factors:

  • Buildings: Sustainable technologies are often required or encouraged in buildings through:
    • Building codes (e.g., energy efficiency, water conservation)
    • Green building certifications (e.g., LEED)
    • Local regulations (e.g., solar panel mandates)
  • Transportation: Sustainable technologies are increasingly important in transportation:
    • Electric vehicle mandates or incentives
    • Public transportation initiatives (e.g., electric buses, light rail)
    • Infrastructure development (e.g., bike lanes, charging stations)
  • Energy Production: The energy sector is a major area for sustainable technology:
    • Renewable energy mandates (e.g., percentage of electricity from solar or wind)
    • Regulations on fossil fuel power plants
    • Incentives for renewable energy development
  • Manufacturing: Sustainable practices are becoming more common in manufacturing:
    • Waste reduction and recycling programs
    • Energy efficiency improvements
    • Sustainable materials sourcing
  • Agriculture: Sustainable technologies are crucial for agriculture:
    • Water-efficient irrigation systems
    • Organic farming practices
    • Precision agriculture techniques
  • Urban Planning: Sustainable technologies play a role in urban development:
    • Smart city technologies
    • Green spaces and urban forestry
    • Sustainable transportation infrastructure

In short: “Sustainable technology of 4620” is not required anywhere because it’s not a defined term. However, many different kinds of sustainable technologies are required or encouraged in a wide variety of places and contexts, from individual buildings to entire cities, and across numerous industries.

If you can provide any more information about where you encountered this term or what it might relate to, I might be able to offer more specific guidance. Even a vague idea of the industry or type of technology involved would be helpful.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4620 ?

As we’ve discussed, “sustainable technology of 4620” is not a recognized term, so it’s not required in any specific way. It’s likely a misremembered term, a very niche reference, or a code within a specific context.

Since we can’t define what “4620” refers to, the best I can do is give you examples of how various sustainable technologies might be required or encouraged, depending on regulations, industry practices, and other factors:

1. Regulations and Laws:

  • Mandates: Governments can mandate the use of certain sustainable technologies, such as:
    • Renewable energy mandates (e.g., requiring a certain percentage of electricity to come from renewable sources)
    • Zero-emission vehicle mandates (e.g., phasing out the sale of gasoline-powered cars)
    • Building codes that require energy-efficient construction or the use of sustainable materials
  • Incentives: Governments can offer incentives to encourage the adoption of sustainable technologies, such as:
    • Tax credits or rebates for installing solar panels or buying electric vehicles
    • Grants or subsidies for businesses that invest in sustainable technologies
  • Standards: Governments can set standards for products or processes that promote sustainability, such as:
    • Energy efficiency standards for appliances
    • Emissions standards for vehicles or factories

2. Industry Practices and Certifications:

  • Industry Standards: Industries may adopt voluntary standards or best practices that encourage the use of sustainable technologies, such as:
    • Sustainable forestry certifications
    • Responsible sourcing of minerals
  • Certifications: Organizations can obtain certifications that demonstrate their commitment to sustainability, such as:
    • LEED certification for green buildings
    • Energy Star certification for appliances
    • B Corp certification for businesses that meet certain social and environmental performance standards

3. Market Forces:

  • Consumer Demand: Consumers can influence the adoption of sustainable technologies by:
    • Choosing to buy eco-friendly products and services
    • Supporting businesses that are committed to sustainability
  • Investor Pressure: Investors are increasingly considering sustainability factors when making investment decisions, which can encourage companies to adopt sustainable practices.

4. Other Factors:

  • Project Requirements: Some projects may require the use of sustainable technologies due to:
    • Funding requirements (e.g., grants or loans with sustainability criteria)
    • Client demands (e.g., businesses seeking eco-friendly products or services)
    • Company policies (e.g., internal sustainability goals)

In short: “Sustainable technology of 4620” is not required in any specific way because it’s not a defined term. However, many different kinds of sustainable technologies are required or encouraged through a variety of mechanisms, including regulations, industry standards, market forces, and other factors.

If you can provide any more information about where you encountered this term or what it might relate to, I might be able to offer more specific guidance. Even a vague idea of the industry or type of technology involved would be helpful.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4620 ?

No, a case study is not a sustainable technology itself. A case study is a method of research or analysis. It’s a way of examining a specific instance, event, or situation in detail. You might use a case study to investigate a sustainable technology, but the case study itself isn’t the technology.

Here’s a breakdown to clarify:

  • Sustainable Technology: This refers to a technology designed to minimize its environmental impact and promote sustainability. Examples include solar panels, wind turbines, electric vehicles, and energy-efficient building materials.
  • Case Study: This is a research approach used to gain an in-depth understanding of a particular subject. It involves a detailed examination of a specific case, which could be a person, group, organization, event, or technology.

Think of it this way: You could do a case study about solar panels (a sustainable technology). The case study might examine how a specific community adopted solar power, the challenges they faced, and the benefits they experienced. The case study would be the research report, while the solar panels are the sustainable technology being studied.

So, a case study can be used to explore and analyze sustainable technologies, but it is not a sustainable technology itself. It’s a research tool.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4620 ?

Since “Sustainable technology of 4620” isn’t a recognized term, there won’t be a white paper specifically on that topic. White papers are typically produced to explain a specific technology, product, or policy. Because “4620” is undefined, no one would create a white paper about it.

However, if you’re interested in white papers related to sustainable technologies in general, there are many available. You can find them by searching online using terms like:

  • “Sustainable technology white paper”
  • “Renewable energy white paper”
  • “Green building white paper”
  • “Sustainable agriculture white paper”
  • [Specific industry] + “sustainability white paper” (e.g., “Manufacturing sustainability white paper”)

When searching, be as specific as possible about the type of sustainable technology you’re interested in. This will help you find relevant white papers.

Keep in mind that white papers can be produced by various organizations, including:

  • Research institutions: These papers often present in-depth analysis of sustainable technologies and their potential impact.
  • Industry associations: These papers may focus on best practices and emerging trends in sustainable technology within a specific industry.
  • Technology companies: These papers may showcase a particular sustainable technology or solution offered by the company.
  • Consulting firms: These papers often provide insights and recommendations on how to implement sustainable technologies.

If you have a specific area of interest within sustainable technology, I can help you find relevant white papers or other resources. Just let me know what you’re looking for.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4620 ?

As we’ve discussed, “Sustainable technology of 4620” isn’t a recognized term. It’s likely a misremembered term, a very niche reference, or a code within a specific context. Therefore, there are no specific industrial applications for something that isn’t defined.

However, I can provide examples of how various sustainable technologies are applied in different industries:

1. Manufacturing:

  • Energy Efficiency: Implementing energy-efficient machinery, lighting, and HVAC systems to reduce energy consumption and costs.
  • Waste Reduction: Minimizing waste generation through process optimization, recycling, and reuse of materials.
  • Sustainable Materials: Using recycled or sustainably sourced materials in production processes.
  • Renewable Energy: Utilizing solar, wind, or other renewable energy sources to power manufacturing facilities.
  • Water Conservation: Implementing water-efficient processes and recycling water within the facility.

2. Construction:

  • Green Building Materials: Using sustainable materials like recycled steel, bamboo, or reclaimed wood.
  • Energy-Efficient Design: Designing buildings to maximize natural light and ventilation, reducing energy needs.
  • Renewable Energy Integration: Incorporating solar panels or other renewable energy systems into buildings.
  • Water Conservation: Installing water-efficient fixtures and rainwater harvesting systems.
  • Waste Management: Implementing construction waste recycling programs.

3. Energy:

  • Renewable Energy Generation: Developing and deploying solar, wind, hydro, and other renewable energy technologies.
  • Smart Grids: Implementing smart grid technologies to optimize energy distribution and reduce waste.
  • Energy Storage: Developing and deploying energy storage solutions to improve the reliability of renewable energy sources.
  • Carbon Capture and Storage: Implementing technologies to capture and store carbon emissions from power plants and industrial facilities.

4. Agriculture:

  • Precision Agriculture: Using technology to optimize irrigation, fertilization, and other inputs, reducing resource use and environmental impact.
  • Organic Farming: Implementing organic farming practices that avoid the use of synthetic pesticides and fertilizers.
  • Conservation Tillage: Using tillage methods that minimize soil erosion and improve soil health.
  • Water-Efficient Irrigation: Implementing water-efficient irrigation systems to conserve water resources.

5. Transportation:

  • Electric Vehicles: Developing and promoting the use of electric vehicles to reduce emissions.
  • Sustainable Fuels: Developing and using biofuels and other sustainable transportation fuels.
  • Public Transportation: Investing in and improving public transportation systems to reduce traffic congestion and emissions.

6. Information Technology:

  • Energy-Efficient Data Centers: Designing and operating data centers to minimize energy consumption.
  • Cloud Computing: Utilizing cloud computing to optimize resource utilization and reduce energy waste.
  • E-waste Recycling: Implementing responsible e-waste recycling programs to recover valuable materials and prevent pollution.

These are just a few examples of how sustainable technologies are being applied in various industries. The specific applications will vary depending on the industry and the specific sustainability challenges being addressed.

If you can provide any more information about where you encountered this term or what it might relate to, I might be able to offer more specific guidance. Even a vague idea of the industry or type of technology involved would be helpful.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4620 ?

As we’ve discussed, “Sustainable technology of 4620” is not a recognized term, so there’s no specific research and development (R&D) focused on it. It’s likely a misremembered term, a very niche reference, or a code within a specific context.

However, I can tell you about the broad landscape of R&D in sustainable technologies:

Key Areas of Focus:

  • Renewable Energy:
    • Improving the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of solar photovoltaic cells.
    • Developing advanced wind turbine designs and offshore wind farms.
    • Researching new energy storage technologies (e.g., batteries, pumped hydro).
    • Exploring innovative ways to harness energy from geothermal, tidal, and wave sources.
  • Energy Efficiency:
    • Developing new materials for building insulation and energy-efficient windows.
    • Creating smart home technologies and energy management systems.
    • Improving the efficiency of appliances, lighting, and industrial processes.
    • Designing sustainable transportation systems and electric vehicles.
  • Sustainable Agriculture:
    • Developing precision agriculture techniques to optimize resource use (water, fertilizers).
    • Researching new crop varieties that are more resilient to climate change and require less input.
    • Exploring sustainable pest control methods and reducing reliance on chemical pesticides.
    • Developing vertical farming and other innovative approaches to food production.
  • Sustainable Materials:
    • Researching and developing bio-based plastics and other sustainable alternatives to traditional materials.
    • Improving the recyclability of materials and developing closed-loop systems.
    • Creating new materials that are more durable, lightweight, and have a lower environmental impact.
  • Water Management:
    • Developing advanced water purification and desalination technologies.
    • Improving water-efficient irrigation systems and reducing water waste in agriculture.
    • Researching rainwater harvesting and greywater recycling systems.

Who is Involved in R&D:

  • Universities and Research Institutions: Conducting fundamental research and developing new sustainable technologies.
  • Government Agencies: Funding research and development initiatives and setting policy priorities.
  • Private Companies: Investing in R&D to develop new sustainable products and services.
  • Startups: Bringing innovative ideas and technologies to the market.

Challenges in Sustainable Technology R&D:

  • Funding: Securing sufficient funding for long-term research projects.
  • Complexity: Sustainable technologies often involve complex systems and require interdisciplinary collaboration.
  • Commercialization: Translating research findings into commercially viable products and services.
  • Infrastructure: Developing the necessary infrastructure to support the deployment of sustainable technologies.

The Future of Sustainable Technology R&D:

  • Increased Collaboration: Greater collaboration between academia, industry, and government.
  • Focus on Interdisciplinarity: Integrating knowledge from different fields to address complex challenges.
  • Emphasis on Life Cycle Assessment: Considering the environmental impact of technologies throughout their entire life cycle.
  • Accelerated Innovation: Faster development and deployment of sustainable solutions to meet urgent sustainability challenges.

If you can provide any more information about where you encountered this term or what it might relate to, I might be able to offer more specific guidance. Even a vague idea of the industry or type of technology involved would be helpful

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
  53. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
  77. ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
  96. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
  107. ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

Recommended HashTags

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »