Leave a Comment / Sustainable Technology of 2020, Sustainable technology of 4580 / By
81 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO

Sustainable technology of 4580 ?

Sustainable technology of 4580 is a broad term that can refer to many different things. However, in general, it refers to any technology that can be used to meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.

Some examples of sustainable technology include:  

  • Renewable energy sources, such as solar, wind, and geothermal power
  • Energy-efficient appliances and buildings
  • Sustainable agriculture practices
  • Waste reduction and recycling technologies
  • Water conservation technologies

Sustainable technology is important because it can help us to reduce our impact on the environment and ensure that we have a healthy planet for future generations. It can also help us to create a more equitable and just society.

Here are some specific examples of sustainable technology that are being developed and used today:

  • Solar panels are becoming more and more efficient and affordable, making them a viable option for powering homes and businesses.
  • Wind turbines are also becoming more efficient and are being used to generate large amounts of electricity.
  • Geothermal power plants are using the heat from the earth to generate electricity.
  • Electric vehicles are becoming more popular and are helping to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels.
  • Sustainable agriculture practices are helping to reduce the environmental impact of food production.
  • Waste reduction and recycling technologies are helping to reduce the amount of waste that we produce.
  • Water conservation technologies are helping us to use less water.

I believe that sustainable technology is essential for the future of our planet. By investing in and using sustainable technology, we can create a more sustainable and equitable world for all.

What is Sustainable technology of 4580 ?

It seems like you’re asking about what sustainable technology might look like in the distant future, specifically the year 4580. That’s a fascinating question!

Predicting technology that far into the future is, of course, very speculative. However, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and the ongoing need for sustainability. Here are some possibilities:

  • Closed-loop resource systems: By 4580, we might have perfected systems where resources are continuously recycled and reused. This could involve advanced material science, nanotechnology, and highly efficient recycling processes. Waste as we know it might be a thing of the past.
  • Energy from unconventional sources: Traditional renewable energy sources like solar and wind might be supplemented by more advanced technologies. Think space-based solar power, geothermal energy tapped from deeper within the Earth, or even harnessing energy from sources we can’t yet imagine.
  • Biologically integrated technology: Technology might become seamlessly integrated with living organisms and ecosystems. This could involve using plants to generate energy, creating biodegradable electronics, or even developing technologies that can repair and restore ecosystems.
  • Hyper-efficient transportation: Transportation could be revolutionized with technologies like advanced maglev trains, personal air mobility vehicles powered by clean energy, or even teleportation (if that becomes possible!).
  • Precision agriculture and food production: Food production could become highly efficient and localized, with vertical farms, hydroponics, and advanced genetic engineering ensuring food security for everyone while minimizing environmental impact.
  • AI-driven sustainability: Artificial intelligence could play a crucial role in optimizing resource use, predicting environmental changes, and developing sustainable solutions.

Of course, these are just a few possibilities. The actual sustainable technologies of 4580 could be far more advanced and unimaginable. What’s certain is that the need for sustainability will continue to drive technological innovation, and future generations will likely develop solutions that we can’t even dream of today.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4580 ?

It’s more accurate to say that sustainable technology in 4580 would be essential for everyone. Here’s why:

  • Resource scarcity: Even with advanced technology, the Earth’s resources are finite. By 4580, unsustainable practices would likely have led to severe resource depletion, making sustainable technologies crucial for survival.
  • Environmental degradation: Climate change and pollution would likely have worsened, requiring advanced technologies to mitigate their effects and restore ecosystems.
  • Population growth: If the human population continues to grow, sustainable technologies will be needed to provide food, water, and energy for everyone.
  • Interconnectedness: In a globalized world, the need for sustainability would be universal. Even if some regions were more advanced than others, everyone would depend on sustainable technologies to maintain a stable and habitable planet.

Therefore, sustainable technology in 4580 wouldn’t be a luxury or an option, but a necessity for all of humanity. It would be the foundation of civilization, enabling people to live in harmony with the environment and ensure a prosperous future for generations to come.

It’s important to remember that sustainable technology is not just about environmental protection. It’s also about social equity, economic development, and ensuring that everyone has access to the resources they need to thrive. In 4580, sustainable technology would likely play a critical role in achieving these goals and creating a more just and sustainable world for all.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4580 ?

This is a bit of a tricky question, as it depends on how we interpret “required”.

  • Technically, sustainable technology of 4580 is required in 4580. By that point, it will likely be absolutely necessary for human survival and well-being due to resource limitations, environmental changes, and the needs of a potentially larger population.
  • However, the need for sustainable technology actually starts now. The groundwork for the sustainable technologies of 4580 needs to be laid today. This means:
    • Investing in research and development of sustainable technologies
    • Educating and training future generations of scientists, engineers, and innovators
    • Implementing sustainable practices in all aspects of life, from energy production to consumption patterns
    • Creating a global framework for cooperation and knowledge sharing

So, while the absolute necessity of sustainable technology might be most evident in 4580, the actions required to achieve it start now. It’s a continuous process that builds upon itself over time.

Think of it like planting a tree. You plant it today, but it provides shade and fruit many years later. Similarly, the seeds of sustainable technology we sow today will hopefully blossom into the solutions needed in 4580 and beyond.

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4580 ?

Sustainable technology in 4580, while crucial for the entire planet, would be most critically required in the following areas:

  • Everywhere on Earth: Sustainability isn’t a localized issue. By 4580, the interconnectedness of global systems would mean that a lack of sustainability anywhere would impact everywhere else. Therefore, sustainable technology would be needed in all inhabited regions, from bustling cities to remote communities.
  • Space (if humanity has expanded beyond Earth): If humans have established settlements on other planets or celestial bodies, sustainable technologies would be even more critical. These off-world locations would likely have limited resources and fragile ecosystems, making closed-loop systems and resource efficiency paramount.
  • Specific Areas of Focus: Even within the broad “everywhere,” certain sectors would have particularly acute needs:
    • Energy Production and Distribution: Clean, renewable, and highly efficient energy systems would be essential to power civilization.
    • Resource Management: Advanced recycling, resource extraction, and material science would be needed to ensure access to essential resources.
    • Food Production: Sustainable agriculture, vertical farming, and other innovative food production methods would be vital to feed a potentially large population.
    • Water Management: Clean water access and efficient water use would be crucial, especially in areas prone to drought or water scarcity.
    • Waste Management: Highly efficient waste processing and recycling technologies would be necessary to minimize pollution and resource depletion.
    • Transportation: Sustainable transportation systems would be needed to move people and goods efficiently and with minimal environmental impact.

In short, while the need for sustainable technology would be universal in 4580, the specific applications and critical areas of focus would vary depending on location, resource availability, and the specific challenges faced by different communities and ecosystems.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4580 ?

That’s a great question! It gets at the heart of how we can actually achieve sustainable technology by 4580. Here’s a breakdown of the key elements:

1. Continuous Innovation and Research:

  • Fundamental Science: Investing in basic research to understand the natural world and discover new principles that can be applied to technology. This could lead to breakthroughs in energy generation, materials science, and more.
  • Applied Engineering: Translating scientific discoveries into practical technologies. This involves designing, building, and testing prototypes, and scaling up production to make these technologies widely available.
  • Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Fostering collaboration between scientists, engineers, designers, and other experts from different fields to develop holistic and integrated solutions.

2. Education and Skill Development:

  • STEM Education: Inspiring and educating future generations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. This will create a workforce capable of developing and implementing sustainable technologies.
  • Sustainability Literacy: Equipping everyone with the knowledge and understanding of sustainability principles so they can make informed choices and contribute to a sustainable future.
  • Lifelong Learning: Providing opportunities for continuous learning and skill development to keep up with the rapid pace of technological advancements.

3. Policy and Governance:

  • Supportive Policies: Implementing policies that encourage sustainable practices and incentivize the development and adoption of sustainable technologies. This could involve carbon pricing, renewable energy targets, and regulations on resource use.
  • International Cooperation: Fostering global collaboration to address shared challenges and ensure that sustainable technologies are accessible to everyone.
  • Ethical Considerations: Establishing ethical guidelines and frameworks to ensure that technological advancements are used responsibly and for the benefit of all.

4. Societal Transformation:

  • Sustainable Lifestyles: Promoting sustainable consumption patterns and encouraging individuals to adopt environmentally friendly practices in their daily lives.
  • Community Engagement: Involving communities in the development and implementation of sustainable solutions to ensure that they are relevant and meet local needs.
  • Cultural Shift: Fostering a culture that values sustainability and recognizes the importance of protecting the environment for future generations.

5. Economic Incentives:

  • Green Investments: Directing investments towards sustainable technologies and industries to drive innovation and create new jobs.
  • Circular Economy: Transitioning to a circular economy where resources are used more efficiently and products are designed for durability, reuse, and recycling.
  • Sustainable Business Practices: Encouraging businesses to adopt sustainable practices throughout their operations, from supply chains to product design.

Achieving sustainable technology by 4580 is a monumental task that requires a concerted effort from individuals, communities, governments, and industries around the world. It’s a journey that starts today, with every step we take towards a more sustainable future.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4580 ?

It’s tricky to give a specific “case study” of sustainable technology in 4580, as that would involve predicting the future with certainty! However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on current trends and the kind of challenges humanity might face:

Case Study: The Revitalization of the Amazon Rainforest in 4580

Background: By the mid-21st century, despite efforts, the Amazon rainforest had suffered significant deforestation and biodiversity loss due to unsustainable agriculture, logging, and climate change. This had cascading effects on global climate patterns and the planet’s ecosystem.

The Challenge: In 4580, with advanced technology and a deep understanding of ecological interconnectedness, a global initiative was launched to fully revitalize the Amazon. This required not just reforestation, but restoring the entire complex ecosystem.

The Solution:

  • AI-powered Ecosystem Management: Advanced AI systems analyzed the intricate web of interactions within the rainforest, predicting the optimal conditions for different species to thrive. Drones and robots assisted in targeted reforestation efforts, planting specific species in areas where they were most likely to flourish.
  • Biologically Integrated Technology: Scientists developed technologies that could interact with the rainforest at a cellular level. This included:
    • Bio-sensors: Tiny devices that monitored the health of plants and animals, providing real-time data on nutrient levels, disease, and environmental stress.
    • Gene Editing: Techniques to enhance the resilience of native species to climate change and disease, ensuring their long-term survival.
    • Symbiotic Technology: Systems that facilitated mutually beneficial relationships between different organisms, such as using fungi to enhance nutrient uptake by plants.
  • Closed-loop Resource Systems: The revitalization effort was powered by renewable energy sources, and all waste generated was recycled or composted, minimizing the project’s environmental footprint.
  • Community Involvement: Local indigenous communities, with their deep knowledge of the rainforest, were actively involved in the project, contributing their expertise and ensuring that the revitalization efforts respected their cultural heritage.

Results:

  • Thriving Ecosystem: By 4580, the Amazon rainforest was restored to a vibrant and self-sustaining ecosystem, with high biodiversity and resilience to environmental changes.
  • Climate Regulation: The revitalized rainforest played a crucial role in regulating global climate patterns, absorbing carbon dioxide and mitigating the effects of climate change.
  • Economic Benefits: Sustainable industries, such as ecotourism and the harvesting of medicinal plants, provided economic opportunities for local communities.

Lessons Learned:

  • Holistic Approach: The success of the project demonstrated the importance of taking a holistic approach to sustainability, considering the interconnectedness of ecological, social, and economic factors.
  • Technological Advancement: Advanced technologies, when used responsibly and ethically, could play a crucial role in restoring and protecting the environment.
  • Community Engagement: The involvement of local communities was essential for the project’s success, highlighting the importance of respecting indigenous knowledge and cultural heritage.

This hypothetical case study illustrates how sustainable technology in 4580 might involve a combination of advanced scientific knowledge, innovative technologies, and a deep understanding of ecological and social systems. It also emphasizes the importance of a long-term perspective and a commitment to intergenerational responsibility.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4580 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 4580: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 4580. While predicting the future with certainty is impossible, we can extrapolate from current trends and anticipate the critical challenges and opportunities that humanity might face. This paper outlines a vision for a future where advanced, integrated sustainable technologies are not just beneficial, but essential for survival and prosperity.

1. Introduction:

The pursuit of sustainability is an ongoing journey, driven by the imperative to balance human needs with the health of our planet. By 4580, the consequences of past unsustainable practices may have become acutely apparent. This necessitates a radical shift towards technologies that not only minimize environmental impact but actively contribute to ecological restoration and regeneration.

2. Key Challenges and Opportunities:

  • Resource Scarcity: Depletion of finite resources will likely be a major concern. Closed-loop systems, advanced recycling, and resource efficiency will be paramount.
  • Climate Change Impacts: The long-term effects of climate change will require sophisticated technologies for adaptation, mitigation, and geoengineering (if deemed necessary and safe).
  • Population Growth and Distribution: Sustainable technologies will be crucial for providing food, water, and energy to a potentially larger and more dispersed population.
  • Ecosystem Restoration: Reversing past environmental damage and restoring degraded ecosystems will demand innovative solutions.
  • Social Equity: Ensuring equitable access to resources and opportunities will be a critical aspect of sustainable development.

3. Vision for Sustainable Technology in 4580:

  • Energy: Energy production will be dominated by renewable sources, potentially including space-based solar, advanced geothermal, and other currently unimaginable technologies. Smart grids and microgrids will optimize energy distribution and usage.
  • Resource Management: Advanced material science and nanotechnology will enable the creation of durable, recyclable materials. “Waste” as we know it will be virtually eliminated through highly efficient closed-loop systems.
  • Food Production: Vertical farms, precision agriculture, and lab-grown meat will supplement traditional agriculture, ensuring food security while minimizing land use and environmental impact.
  • Water Management: Advanced filtration and purification technologies will provide access to clean water, even in arid regions. Smart irrigation systems and water conservation practices will be widely adopted.
  • Transportation: Transportation will be revolutionized by hyper-efficient systems like maglev trains, personal air mobility vehicles powered by clean energy, and potentially even breakthroughs like teleportation.
  • Ecosystem Restoration: Biologically integrated technology, AI-powered ecosystem management, and advanced genetic engineering will be used to restore and protect ecosystems.
  • Information and Communication: Highly advanced communication networks and AI systems will play a crucial role in optimizing resource use, predicting environmental changes, and coordinating sustainable development efforts.

4. Enabling Technologies:

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI): AI will be integral to optimizing complex systems, predicting environmental changes, and developing sustainable solutions.
  • Nanotechnology: Nanomaterials will enable the creation of more efficient energy storage devices, advanced sensors, and other critical technologies.
  • Biotechnology: Genetic engineering and synthetic biology will be used to enhance crop yields, develop biofuels, and even create biodegradable materials.
  • Quantum Computing: Quantum computing could unlock new possibilities in materials science, energy storage, and other fields relevant to sustainability.

5. The Path to 4580:

Achieving this vision requires sustained effort across multiple fronts:

  • Research and Development: Continuous investment in basic science and applied engineering is essential.
  • Education and Training: Developing a workforce with the skills and knowledge to create and implement sustainable technologies.
  • Policy and Governance: Creating supportive policies and regulations that incentivize sustainable practices.
  • Global Collaboration: Fostering international cooperation to address shared challenges and ensure equitable access to sustainable technologies.
  • Societal Transformation: Promoting sustainable lifestyles and fostering a culture that values environmental stewardship.

6. Conclusion:

While the specifics of sustainable technology in 4580 remain uncertain, the need for it is undeniable. By embracing innovation, fostering collaboration, and prioritizing sustainability, we can create a future where humanity thrives in harmony with the natural world. This white paper serves as a call to action, urging us to begin laying the groundwork for a sustainable future, starting today.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4580 ?

It’s speculative, of course, but we can imagine some potential industrial applications of sustainable technology in 4580, extrapolating from current trends and considering the long-term challenges humanity might face:

1. Advanced Materials Production:

  • Closed-loop Material Cycles: Factories would likely operate on closed-loop principles, where all waste is recycled and reused. Advanced material science would allow for the creation of incredibly durable and easily recyclable materials, minimizing the need for raw resource extraction.
  • Bio-integrated Materials: Industries might utilize bio-engineered materials grown from renewable resources. Imagine factories that “grow” their building materials or produce biodegradable plastics from algae or other biological sources.
  • Nanofabrication: Nanotechnology could enable the on-demand creation of materials with specific properties, reducing waste and allowing for highly customized products.

2. Energy Generation and Distribution:

  • Decentralized Energy Systems: Large, centralized power plants might be a thing of the past. Instead, industries could rely on a network of localized, highly efficient energy generation facilities, perhaps utilizing a combination of advanced solar, geothermal, and other renewable technologies.
  • Energy Harvesting: Industrial equipment could be designed to harvest energy from their surroundings – vibrations, heat, even ambient electromagnetic fields – contributing to the overall energy supply.
  • Space-Based Solar Power: If space-based solar becomes viable, industries could receive clean energy beamed down from orbiting solar farms.

3. Manufacturing and Production:

  • Additive Manufacturing (4D Printing): 3D printing would likely be highly advanced, with the ability to create complex objects from a wide range of sustainable materials. “4D printing” could even allow objects to change shape over time in response to environmental stimuli.
  • AI-Optimized Production: AI systems would manage and optimize all aspects of industrial processes, from design and manufacturing to logistics and supply chain management, minimizing waste and maximizing efficiency.
  • Vertical Factories: To minimize land use, factories could be built vertically, integrating production with urban environments and reducing transportation needs.

4. Resource Extraction and Processing:

  • Sustainable Mining: If mining is still necessary, it would be done with minimal environmental impact, using advanced robotics and AI to target resources and minimize waste. In-situ resource utilization (ISRU) on other planets or asteroids might also be a possibility.
  • Advanced Recycling: Highly efficient recycling facilities would be able to break down complex products into their constituent materials and reuse them in new products, creating a truly circular economy.

5. Environmental Remediation and Restoration:

  • Pollution Capture and Conversion: Industries could develop technologies to capture and convert pollutants into useful resources, effectively turning waste into valuable materials.
  • Ecosystem Restoration Technologies: Companies might specialize in restoring damaged ecosystems, using bio-integrated technologies and AI-powered systems to revitalize forests, oceans, and other natural environments.

6. Biotechnology and Agriculture:

  • Biomanufacturing: Industries could use biological processes to produce a wide range of products, from pharmaceuticals and biofuels to biodegradable plastics and even food.
  • Precision Agriculture: Advanced sensors, AI, and robotics would enable highly efficient and sustainable agriculture, maximizing yields while minimizing water and fertilizer use.

It’s important to remember that these are just a few possibilities. The actual industrial applications of sustainable technology in 4580 could be far more diverse and innovative than we can imagine today. The key driver will be the absolute necessity of operating within the Earth’s ecological limits and creating a truly sustainable industrial ecosystem.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4580 ?

You’re asking about the very foundation of how we might get to sustainable technology in 4580! Research and development (R&D) is absolutely crucial. Here’s a breakdown of what that might entail, keeping in mind the long-term horizon:

1. Fundamental Science:

  • New Energy Sources: Exploring and understanding fundamental physics to discover entirely new ways to generate clean energy. This could involve harnessing zero-point energy, manipulating spacetime, or tapping into yet-unknown forces of nature.
  • Material Science Breakthroughs: Investigating the fundamental properties of matter to create materials with unprecedented characteristics: super-strength, self-healing, adaptable, and infinitely recyclable. This could involve manipulating matter at the atomic or subatomic level.
  • Understanding Complex Systems: Developing a deeper understanding of complex systems, from ecosystems to climate patterns, to predict and manage them effectively. This would involve advanced modeling, simulation, and data analysis techniques.

2. Applied Engineering:

  • Translating Discoveries into Technology: Taking the fundamental discoveries and turning them into practical technologies. This would involve designing, building, and testing prototypes, and scaling up production to make these technologies widely available.
  • Bio-integrated Technology: Developing technologies that can seamlessly integrate with living organisms and ecosystems. This could involve using plants to generate energy, creating biodegradable electronics, or even developing technologies that can repair and restore ecosystems.
  • AI and Automation: Creating advanced AI systems that can automate research and development processes, accelerating the pace of innovation. This could involve AI-powered robots that can conduct experiments, analyze data, and design new technologies.

3. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

  • Bridging Disciplines: Fostering collaboration between scientists, engineers, designers, and other experts from different fields to develop holistic and integrated solutions. This would involve creating research institutions and programs that bring together experts from diverse backgrounds.
  • Global Knowledge Sharing: Establishing a global framework for cooperation and knowledge sharing to accelerate the development of sustainable technologies. This could involve creating open-access databases, international research collaborations, and global conferences.

4. Long-Term Vision and Roadmapping:

  • Anticipating Future Challenges: Identifying the key challenges that humanity might face in the coming centuries, from resource scarcity to climate change, and prioritizing research efforts accordingly.
  • Developing Technology Roadmaps: Creating long-term technology roadmaps that outline the steps needed to achieve sustainable technology goals. This would involve setting milestones, identifying key research areas, and allocating resources effectively.

5. Ethical Considerations:

  • Responsible Innovation: Establishing ethical guidelines and frameworks to ensure that technological advancements are used responsibly and for the benefit of all. This would involve considering the potential social and environmental impacts of new technologies and developing strategies to mitigate any negative consequences.
  • Intergenerational Responsibility: Recognizing our responsibility to future generations and ensuring that the technologies we develop today will not compromise their ability to meet their own needs.

The R&D efforts for sustainable technology in 4580 would need to be a continuous and long-term endeavor, driven by a deep commitment to sustainability and a vision for a thriving future for all. It would require a global effort, with scientists, engineers, and innovators from all over the world working together to solve the challenges facing humanity and create a more sustainable world.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

References

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  7. ^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
  9. ^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  10. ^ Jump up to:a b c d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  13. ^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
  14. ^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
  15. ^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  19. ^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
  25. ^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  26. ^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  28. ^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
  29. ^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
  30. ^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  31. ^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
  32. ^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  33. ^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  34. ^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
  35. ^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
  36. ^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
  37. ^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  38. ^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
  40. ^ Jump up to:a b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  41. ^ Jump up to:a b c d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
  42. ^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
  44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
  45. ^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
  46. ^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
  47. ^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
  48. ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
  50. ^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
  52. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
  53. ^ Jump up to:a b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
  54. ^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
  55. ^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
  56. ^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  57. ^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  58. ^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
  59. ^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
  60. ^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
  61. ^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
  62. ^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
  63. ^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
  64. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  65. ^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
  66. ^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
  67. ^ Jump up to:a b c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
  68. ^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  69. ^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
  70. ^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
  71. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  72. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  73. ^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  74. ^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
  75. ^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  76. ^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
  77. ^ Jump up to:a b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
  78. ^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
  80. ^ Jump up to:a b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
  81. ^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.[page needed]
  82. ^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
  83. ^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
  84. ^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  86. ^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  87. ^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
  88. ^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
  89. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  90. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  91. ^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  93. ^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
  94. ^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
  95. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
  96. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
  97. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  98. ^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
  99. ^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
  100. ^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
  101. ^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024.  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  102. ^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
  103. ^ Jump up to:a b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
  104. ^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
  105. ^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
  106. ^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
  107. ^ Jump up to:a b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
  108. ^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  109. ^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
  110. ^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
  111. ^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
  112. ^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
  113. ^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  114. ^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  115. ^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  116. ^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  117. ^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
  118. ^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  119. ^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
  120. ^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
  121. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
  122. ^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
  123. ^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.

Recommended HashTags

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »