Sustainable technology of 4570

79 / 100

Sustainable technology of 4570 ?

It seems like you might be asking about the Intel Core i5-4570 processor and its role in sustainable technology. While this processor itself isn’t a “sustainable technology” in the way we might think of solar panels or wind turbines, it does play a role in the broader picture of sustainability in technology. Here’s how:

Efficiency:

Energy Consumption: The i5-4570 was designed with power efficiency in mind, especially for its time. It has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 84W, which means it doesn’t consume excessive energy for its performance level.
Performance per Watt: This processor offered a good balance of performance and power consumption, which is crucial for reducing the overall energy footprint of computing devices.

Lifespan and Reusability:

Longevity: Processors like the i5-4570 have a relatively long lifespan. Many computers with this processor are still in use today, reducing the need for frequent replacements and the associated environmental impact of manufacturing and disposal.
Reusability: Even when a computer with this processor is retired, the processor itself can potentially be reused in other devices or for other purposes, further extending its lifespan.

Indirect Contributions:

Enabling Sustainable Applications: Processors like the i5-4570 power the computers used to develop and implement sustainable technologies in various fields, such as:
- Environmental modeling and analysis
- Renewable energy research
- Smart grid management
- Sustainable agriculture and urban planning

Considerations:

Older Technology: While efficient for its time, newer processors offer even better performance per watt, so upgrading to a more modern system can further reduce energy consumption.
E-waste: Proper disposal of computers and processors is crucial to minimize the environmental impact of e-waste.

In conclusion: While the Intel Core i5-4570 isn’t a “sustainable technology” on its own, it contributes to sustainability by being reasonably efficient, having a long lifespan, and enabling the development of other sustainable technologies. As technology advances, newer processors offer even greater efficiency and contribute further to the goal of sustainable computing.

What is Sustainable technology of 4570 ?

You’re right to think about sustainability in the context of technology! While the Intel Core i5-4570 itself isn’t a “sustainable technology” like a solar panel, it does have a role to play in the bigger picture. Here’s how:

Efficiency for its time: The i5-4570 was designed with power efficiency in mind, especially considering the technology available when it was released. It has a reasonable TDP (Thermal Design Power), meaning it doesn’t use an excessive amount of energy for the performance it offers.
Longevity and reuse: Processors like this have a pretty good lifespan. Many computers using the i5-4570 are still running today. This reduces the need for frequent replacements, which is good for the environment because it means less manufacturing and less e-waste. Even when a computer with this processor is retired, the processor itself might be reused in other devices, further extending its life.
Enabling sustainable applications: Processors like the i5-4570 power the computers we use to develop and implement sustainable technologies in various fields. Think about things like:
- Environmental modeling and analysis
- Research into renewable energy
- Smart grid management
- Sustainable agriculture and urban planning

Important to keep in mind:

Newer is better (for efficiency): While the i5-4570 was good for its time, newer processors are even more efficient. If you’re looking to minimize energy use, upgrading to a more modern system can make a difference.
E-waste is a concern: It’s crucial to dispose of computers and processors properly to reduce the environmental impact of e-waste.

In summary: The Intel Core i5-4570 contributes to sustainability by being reasonably efficient, having a long lifespan, and enabling the development of other sustainable technologies. As technology gets better, newer processors will continue to improve efficiency and contribute even more to sustainable computing.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4570 ?

It seems you’re interested in who benefits from the “sustainable technology” aspects of a processor like the i5-4570. Here’s a breakdown:

Individuals:
- Reduced energy bills: More efficient processors mean lower power consumption, which can lead to savings on electricity costs over time.
- Longer device lifespan: Processors with good longevity mean you might not need to replace your computer as often, saving you money and reducing electronic waste.
Businesses:
- Lower operating costs: Energy-efficient processors can help businesses reduce their energy consumption and associated costs, especially when considering large-scale deployments of computers.
- Improved brand image: Companies that prioritize energy efficiency and sustainability can enhance their reputation and appeal to environmentally conscious customers.
The Environment:
- Reduced energy consumption: Less energy used means less reliance on fossil fuels, which helps reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change.
- Less e-waste: Longer lifespans for processors and proper disposal of old devices contribute to reducing the amount of electronic waste that ends up in landfills.
Society as a whole:
- Sustainable development: By enabling the development of sustainable technologies in various fields, processors like the i5-4570 contribute to a more sustainable future for everyone.
- Resource conservation: Efficient use of energy and materials helps conserve natural resources and reduces the environmental impact of technology.

In essence, everyone benefits from the sustainable technology aspects of processors like the i5-4570. It’s a win-win situation where individuals, businesses, the environment, and society as a whole can reap the rewards of more efficient and sustainable computing.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4570 ?

That’s a great question! It’s not about a specific point in time, but rather a constant and growing need. Here’s why sustainable technology, including aspects related to processors like the i5-4570, is always required:

Ongoing resource depletion: Our planet’s resources are finite. We need sustainable technology to help us use those resources more efficiently and responsibly, reducing waste and minimizing our impact on the environment. This is a continuous need, not something we can address once and then forget about.
Climate change: The effects of climate change are becoming more and more apparent. Sustainable technology is crucial for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and transitioning to cleaner energy sources. This is an urgent and ongoing challenge that requires constant innovation and implementation of sustainable solutions.
E-waste problem: The amount of electronic waste we generate is increasing rapidly. Sustainable technology helps by extending the lifespan of devices, promoting reuse and recycling, and reducing the need for frequent replacements. This is an ongoing issue that needs continuous attention to prevent harmful environmental consequences.
Growing demand for technology: As our reliance on technology grows, so does our energy consumption and environmental impact. Sustainable technology is essential for ensuring that we can continue to benefit from technological advancements without compromising the health of our planet. This is a long-term need that will only become more important in the future.

In short, the need for sustainable technology is not tied to a specific date or event. It’s an ongoing requirement driven by the need to protect our planet, conserve resources, and ensure a sustainable future for all.

Think of it like this: Sustainable technology isn’t a destination, it’s a journey. We need to continuously strive for more efficient, responsible, and environmentally friendly ways of using technology.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4570 ?

The need for sustainable technology, including the considerations around processors like the i5-4570, isn’t limited to one specific place. It’s a global requirement. Here’s a breakdown of where it’s needed and why:

Homes: Individuals using computers at home contribute to overall energy consumption. More efficient processors and responsible e-waste disposal make a difference cumulatively.
Businesses (Small and Large): Businesses often have many computers and other devices. The energy savings from efficient processors are magnified at scale, leading to significant cost reductions and a smaller carbon footprint. Proper e-waste management is also crucial for businesses.
Data Centers: Data centers use massive amounts of energy. Efficiency improvements in processors and other hardware have a huge impact on their energy consumption and environmental impact.
Government and Public Institutions: Governments and public institutions also use a lot of technology. Their adoption of sustainable practices, including using efficient hardware and managing e-waste, sets an example and contributes to national sustainability goals.
Developing Countries: Sustainable technology is especially important in developing countries, where access to resources may be limited. Efficient technology can help bridge the digital divide while minimizing environmental impact.
Everywhere Technology is Used: Essentially, anywhere computers and electronic devices are used, there’s a need for sustainable technology practices. This includes schools, hospitals, research institutions, and even in manufacturing and transportation.

In essence, the need for sustainable technology is universal. It’s not about one particular location, but about a global effort to reduce our environmental impact and ensure a sustainable future. Every individual, organization, and country has a role to play in adopting and promoting sustainable technology practices.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4570 ?

It seems you’re asking how the concept of “sustainable technology” applies to a processor like the i5-4570. Here’s a breakdown:

1. Efficient Design:

Power Consumption: The i5-4570 was designed to be reasonably power-efficient for its time. It has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) rating that indicates its power consumption. While not the most efficient by today’s standards, it was decent for its generation.
Performance per Watt: This processor offered a good balance of performance and power usage. This is important because it means you could get decent computing power without excessive energy consumption.

2. Longevity and Reuse:

Long Lifespan: Processors like the i5-4570 often have a long lifespan. Many computers using this processor are still functional years later. This reduces the need for frequent upgrades, which in turn reduces the environmental impact of manufacturing new devices.
Potential for Reuse: Even when a computer with this processor is retired, the processor itself might be reused in other devices or for different purposes, further extending its useful life.

3. Enabling Sustainable Applications:

Foundation for Green Tech: Processors like the i5-4570 power the computers used to develop and implement sustainable technologies in various fields. Think about things like:
- Environmental modeling and analysis
- Research into renewable energy
- Smart grid management
- Sustainable agriculture and urban planning

Important Considerations:

Technology Marches On: While the i5-4570 was good for its time, newer processors are significantly more energy-efficient. Upgrading to a more modern system can further reduce your energy consumption.
E-waste Matters: Proper disposal of computers and processors is essential to minimize the environmental impact of e-waste.

In essence, the “sustainability” of a processor like the i5-4570 comes from a combination of its efficient design for its time, its potential for long lifespan and reuse, and its role in enabling the development of other sustainable technologies.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4570 ?

Unfortunately, there isn’t a specific, publicly available case study focused solely on the “sustainable technology” aspects of the i5-4570. However, we can construct a sort of case study by looking at how this processor fits into the broader picture of sustainable technology in computing:

Case Study: The i5-4570 as a Microcosm of Sustainable Computing

Background: The Intel Core i5-4570, launched in 2013, was a mainstream processor for desktop computers. While not explicitly marketed for its “green” features, it embodies several key principles of sustainable technology for its time.

Key Aspects of Sustainability:

Efficiency: The i5-4570 offered a good balance of performance and power consumption. Its TDP of 84W was reasonable for its capabilities, meaning it didn’t waste excessive energy for the tasks it performed. This contributes to lower electricity consumption and reduced carbon footprint over the lifespan of the processor.
Longevity: Many computers with the i5-4570 are still in use today. This extended lifespan reduces the need for frequent replacements, minimizing the environmental impact associated with manufacturing and disposing of electronic devices.
Enabling Sustainable Applications: The i5-4570, and processors like it, powered the computers used to develop and implement sustainable technologies in various fields. This indirect contribution to sustainability is significant, as it supports research, innovation, and practical solutions for environmental challenges.

Challenges and Limitations:

Technological Advancement: While efficient for its time, the i5-4570 is less efficient than newer processors. This highlights the constant need for innovation in sustainable technology to improve performance per watt and reduce energy consumption.
E-waste Management: Proper disposal of computers containing i5-4570 processors is crucial. This emphasizes the importance of responsible e-waste recycling to minimize the environmental impact of hazardous materials.

Lessons Learned:

Incremental Improvements: Even seemingly small improvements in processor efficiency can have a significant cumulative impact on sustainability when considering the vast number of computers in use globally.
Lifecycle Approach: Sustainable technology requires a lifecycle perspective, considering not just the performance of a device but also its longevity, potential for reuse, and responsible disposal.
Enabling Role: Processors like the i5-4570 play an essential role in enabling the development of other sustainable technologies, highlighting the interconnectedness of different fields in addressing environmental challenges.

Conclusion:

While not a subject of a formal case study, the i5-4570 exemplifies how sustainability can be integrated into mainstream technology. Its efficiency, longevity, and role in enabling sustainable applications demonstrate the importance of considering environmental factors in the design and use of computing devices. This “case study” highlights the ongoing need for advancements in sustainable technology to minimize our environmental impact and create a more sustainable future

.COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4570 ?

I can’t create a formal white paper with citations and in-depth research, as I’m a language model. However, I can give you a structured outline and key points that you could use as a starting point for your own white paper on the “sustainable technology” aspects of the i5-4570:

Title: The Intel Core i5-4570: A Case Study in Sustainable Computing for its Time

Abstract: This white paper examines the Intel Core i5-4570 processor as a case study in sustainable computing within the context of its release period. It explores the processor’s contributions to sustainability through its efficiency, longevity, and role in enabling other sustainable technologies, while also acknowledging its limitations and the evolving nature of sustainable technology.

1. Introduction:

Briefly introduce the concept of sustainable technology in computing.
State the purpose of the white paper: to analyze the i5-4570’s role in sustainable computing.
Briefly introduce the i5-4570 and its context (release year, target market).

2. Efficiency as a Cornerstone of Sustainability:

Discuss the importance of energy efficiency in computing.
Analyze the i5-4570’s TDP and its implications for power consumption.
Compare the i5-4570’s power efficiency to other processors of its time (if data is available).
Discuss the concept of performance per watt and how the i5-4570 fared.

3. Longevity and the Reduction of E-waste:

Explain the connection between device lifespan and e-waste generation.
Discuss the typical lifespan of computers using the i5-4570.
Explore the potential for reusing i5-4570 processors in other devices.
Connect this longevity to the principles of a circular economy.

4. Enabling Sustainable Applications:

Discuss the role of computing in developing and implementing sustainable technologies.
Provide examples of sustainable applications that rely on processors like the i5-4570 (e.g., environmental modeling, renewable energy research).
Emphasize the indirect contribution of the i5-4570 to broader sustainability efforts.

5. Limitations and the Evolution of Sustainable Technology:

Acknowledge that the i5-4570, while reasonably efficient for its time, is less efficient than newer processors.
Discuss the rapid pace of technological advancement in computing and the need for continuous improvement in energy efficiency.
Highlight the importance of responsible e-waste management for all electronic devices, including those containing i5-4570 processors.

6. Conclusion:

Summarize the i5-4570’s contributions to sustainable computing through its efficiency, longevity, and enabling role.
Reiterate the importance of a lifecycle approach to sustainable technology, considering all stages from design to disposal.
Emphasize the ongoing need for innovation and improvement in sustainable computing practices.

7. Future Directions (Optional):

Briefly discuss the future of sustainable computing and the trends that are shaping it (e.g., more efficient processors, advanced cooling technologies, circular economy initiatives).

Remember to:

Conduct research: Gather data on the i5-4570’s specifications, power consumption, and comparisons to other processors.
Cite your sources: Properly attribute any information or data you use.
Use visuals: Include charts, graphs, or images to illustrate your points.
Keep it concise and focused: A white paper should be informative but not overly long.

This outline should give you a good foundation for creating your white paper. Good luck!

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4570 ?

While the i5-4570 might not be the cutting edge of efficiency by today’s standards, it and processors like it have played a role in industrial applications, particularly when considering the longevity of industrial equipment. Here’s how:

1. Industrial Control Systems:

Automation: Many industrial processes rely on automated control systems. These systems often use computers with processors like the i5-4570 to monitor sensors, control machinery, and make real-time adjustments. The i5-4570 offered sufficient processing power for many of these tasks, and its reliability made it suitable for industrial environments.
Longevity: Industrial equipment often has a long lifespan. Processors like the i5-4570, with their robust design, could remain in service for many years, contributing to the overall sustainability of the industrial system by minimizing the need for frequent replacements.

2. Data Acquisition and Analysis:

Monitoring: Industries generate vast amounts of data from their operations. Processors like the i5-4570 were used in systems that collect and analyze this data to optimize processes, improve efficiency, and identify potential problems.
Resource Optimization: By enabling better data analysis, these processors indirectly contributed to sustainability by helping industries use resources more efficiently, reduce waste, and minimize their environmental impact.

3. Embedded Systems:

Specialized Tasks: The i5-4570 could be found in some embedded systems designed for specific industrial tasks. These systems might be used in areas like manufacturing, energy production, or transportation.
Efficiency for the Task: While not the most power-efficient processor ever, the i5-4570 offered a good balance of performance and power consumption for many industrial applications.

Important Considerations:

Newer Alternatives: Today, more modern and energy-efficient processors are available for industrial applications. These newer processors offer better performance per watt and can further contribute to sustainability.
System-Level Sustainability: It’s important to remember that sustainability in industrial applications goes beyond just the processor. Factors like overall system design, energy management, and waste reduction are also crucial.

In summary: While the i5-4570 might not be the first thing that comes to mind when you think of “sustainable technology,” it and processors like it have played a role in making industrial processes more efficient and reliable. Their longevity and ability to handle demanding tasks have contributed to the sustainability of industrial systems over time.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4570 ?

It’s interesting to think about research and development (R&D) related to the i5-4570 in the context of sustainable technology. While the processor itself is no longer in production, the principles and lessons learned from its development can inform future R&D efforts. Here’s how:

1. Efficiency Improvements:

Continued Miniaturization: Research into new semiconductor materials and manufacturing processes aims to create even smaller and more efficient transistors. This leads to processors with higher performance and lower power consumption.
Architectural Optimization: R&D focuses on designing processor architectures that maximize performance per watt. This includes techniques like heterogeneous computing, where specialized processing units handle specific tasks, improving overall efficiency.

2. Power Management:

Dynamic Frequency Scaling: Research is ongoing to develop more sophisticated power management techniques that dynamically adjust processor frequency and voltage based on workload demands, further reducing energy consumption.
Low-Power States: R&D explores new low-power states for processors that allow them to conserve energy when idle or performing less demanding tasks.

3. Materials and Manufacturing:

Sustainable Materials: Research is looking into using more sustainable materials in processor manufacturing, reducing reliance on rare earth elements and other environmentally problematic substances.
Reduced Waste: R&D aims to minimize waste during the manufacturing process, improving resource efficiency and reducing the environmental footprint of processor production.

4. Extending Lifespan and Reusability:

Durability and Reliability: Research focuses on improving the durability and reliability of processors, extending their lifespan and reducing the need for replacements.
Recycling and Reuse: R&D explores new methods for recycling and reusing processor components, recovering valuable materials and reducing e-waste.

5. Software Optimization:

Energy-Aware Software: R&D includes developing software that is more energy-aware, optimizing code to minimize processor usage and reduce power consumption.
Virtualization and Cloud Computing: Research into virtualization and cloud computing technologies allows for more efficient use of computing resources, reducing the need for physical processors and lowering overall energy consumption.

In summary: While the i5-4570 itself is a product of past R&D, the principles of sustainable technology that it embodies continue to drive research and development in the semiconductor industry. This ongoing R&D is crucial for creating more efficient, durable, and environmentally friendly processors that will power the sustainable technologies of the future.

COURTESY : TURILYTIX

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.