Sustainable technology of 4180

79 / 100

Sustainable technology of 4180 ?

Sustainable technology in 4180 would likely be highly advanced and integrated into all aspects of life. Here are some possible examples:

Energy: Fusion power would be the primary source of energy, providing clean and abundant power for all needs. Smart grids would optimize energy distribution and usage, minimizing waste.
Transportation: Flying cars and high-speed maglev trains would be commonplace, powered by clean energy sources. Self-driving vehicles would be the norm, reducing accidents and traffic congestion.
Housing: Buildings would be self-sufficient, generating their own energy and water. Vertical farms and hydroponic gardens would provide fresh produce for urban populations.
Manufacturing: Advanced robotics and AI would automate manufacturing processes, reducing waste and pollution. 3D printing would allow for on-demand production of goods, minimizing transportation needs.
Agriculture: Precision agriculture and vertical farming would maximize food production while minimizing land and water usage. Genetically modified crops would be more resilient and nutritious.
Waste management: Advanced recycling and composting technologies would eliminate waste and pollution. Bioplastics and biodegradable materials would replace traditional plastics.
Healthcare: Nanotechnology and AI would enable early disease detection and personalized medicine. Advanced prosthetics and implants would improve quality of life for people with disabilities.
Communication: Brain-computer interfaces would allow for seamless communication and information access. Virtual reality and augmented reality would provide immersive experiences for entertainment and education.

These are just a few examples of the many sustainable technologies that might exist in 4180. The possibilities are endless, and the future is sure to hold many surprises.

What is Sustainable technology of 4180 ?

Sustainable technology in 4180 would be incredibly advanced and seamlessly integrated into every facet of life. Here are some potential examples:

Energy: Fusion power would be the dominant energy source, providing clean and abundant power for all needs. Smart grids would optimize energy distribution and usage, minimizing waste.
Transportation: Flying cars and high-speed maglev trains would be commonplace, powered by clean energy sources. Self-driving vehicles would be the norm, reducing accidents and traffic congestion.
Housing: Buildings would be self-sufficient, generating their own energy and water. Vertical farms and hydroponic gardens would provide fresh produce for urban populations.
Manufacturing: Advanced robotics and AI would automate manufacturing processes, reducing waste and pollution. 3D printing would allow for on-demand production of goods, minimizing transportation needs.
Agriculture: Precision agriculture and vertical farming would maximize food production while minimizing land and water usage. Genetically modified crops would be more resilient and nutritious.
Waste management: Advanced recycling and composting technologies would eliminate waste and pollution. Bioplastics and biodegradable materials would replace traditional plastics.
Healthcare: Nanotechnology and AI would enable early disease detection and personalized medicine. Advanced prosthetics and implants would improve quality of life for people with disabilities.
Communication: Brain-computer interfaces would allow for seamless communication and information access. Virtual reality and augmented reality would provide immersive experiences for entertainment and education.

These are just a few examples of the many sustainable technologies that might exist in 4180. The possibilities are endless, and the future is sure to hold many surprises.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 4180 ?

It’s difficult to say with certainty who would be required to use sustainable technology in 4180, as that depends on how society and technology evolve. However, it’s likely that a combination of factors would drive the adoption and use of sustainable technologies:

Governments and Regulations: Governments might mandate the use of sustainable technologies in various sectors to ensure environmental protection and resource conservation. This could include regulations on energy efficiency, waste management, transportation, and manufacturing.
Businesses and Industries: Companies would likely adopt sustainable technologies to reduce costs, improve their public image, and comply with regulations. They might also find that sustainable practices lead to innovation and new market opportunities.
Individuals and Consumers: Individuals might choose to use sustainable technologies in their daily lives to reduce their environmental impact and save money. This could include using renewable energy sources, energy-efficient appliances, and sustainable transportation options.
Global Organizations and Treaties: International agreements and organizations might play a role in promoting and enforcing the use of sustainable technologies on a global scale, especially to address climate change and other environmental challenges.

Ultimately, the widespread adoption of sustainable technology in 4180 would likely be a result of a combination of these factors, with governments, businesses, and individuals all playing a role in creating a more sustainable future.

When is required Sustainable technology of 4180 ?

While it’s impossible to pinpoint an exact date for when sustainable technology will be absolutely required in 4180, it’s safe to say that its adoption will be a gradual process driven by a combination of factors over time. Here’s a possible timeline of how it might unfold:

Now – 2100: Increasing awareness of climate change and environmental issues will drive the development and adoption of sustainable technologies. Governments will likely implement policies and regulations to encourage or mandate their use in certain sectors.
2100 – 2500: As resources become scarcer and environmental problems worsen, the pressure to adopt sustainable practices will intensify. Sustainable technologies will become more cost-effective and widely available, making them the preferred choice for many businesses and individuals.
2500 – 3000: Sustainable technologies will likely become the norm in most developed countries. International agreements and organizations will play a key role in promoting their adoption globally.
3000 – 4180: By this point, it’s conceivable that sustainable technologies will be so essential for survival and well-being that they will be universally required. This could be enforced through laws, social norms, or simply the necessity of adapting to a changing environment.

Of course, this is just a hypothetical scenario. The actual timeline may vary depending on various factors, such as the pace of technological development, the severity of environmental challenges, and the political and economic landscape. However, it’s clear that the need for sustainable technology will only grow stronger over time, making it an inevitable part of our future.

COUTRESY : Sustainable Technology Solutions

Where is required Sustainable technology of 4180 ?

In 4180, it’s likely that sustainable technology would be required in virtually all aspects of life, across the globe. Here’s a breakdown of potential areas where it would be essential:

Urban Centers: Cities would need to be entirely self-sufficient in terms of energy, water, and food production. This would involve widespread use of renewable energy sources, closed-loop water systems, and vertical farms.
Rural Areas: Sustainable agriculture and land management practices would be crucial for ensuring food security and preserving biodiversity. This could include precision agriculture, agroforestry, and permaculture.
Transportation Systems: Sustainable transportation would be essential for moving people and goods efficiently and with minimal environmental impact. This would involve widespread use of electric vehicles, high-speed trains, and potentially even flying cars powered by clean energy sources.
Manufacturing and Industry: Factories would need to operate with minimal waste and pollution, using closed-loop systems and sustainable materials. This could involve advanced robotics, 3D printing, and biomanufacturing.
Homes and Buildings: Buildings would need to be self-sufficient in terms of energy and water, and built with sustainable materials. This could involve the use of solar panels, rainwater harvesting systems, and green roofs.
Infrastructure: Sustainable infrastructure would be essential for supporting all of these areas. This would include smart grids for energy distribution, advanced water management systems, and sustainable transportation networks.

Ultimately, the need for sustainable technology in 4180 would be driven by the need to protect the environment, conserve resources, and ensure a high quality of life for all people. It would be a fundamental requirement for a thriving and resilient society.

How is required Sustainable technology of 4180 ?

In 4180, sustainable technology would likely be required in a comprehensive and integrated way, touching upon nearly every aspect of life. Here’s how it might be implemented:

1. Systemic Integration:

Interconnected Systems: Sustainable technologies would be seamlessly integrated into complex systems, such as smart grids for energy, closed-loop water systems, and automated resource management platforms.
Holistic Approach: A holistic approach would be taken, considering the entire lifecycle of products and services, from resource extraction to manufacturing, use, and disposal.

2. Technological Advancements:

Advanced Materials: Sustainable materials, like bioplastics and self-healing composites, would be widely used in construction, manufacturing, and everyday products.
Artificial Intelligence: AI would play a crucial role in optimizing resource usage, predicting environmental changes, and managing complex sustainable systems.
Nanotechnology: Nanotechnology could be used for water purification, energy storage, and environmental remediation.

3. Societal Shifts:

Circular Economy: A circular economy would be the norm, with a focus on reducing waste, reusing materials, and recycling resources.
Sustainable Consumption: Individuals would be encouraged to adopt sustainable lifestyles, consuming less and making conscious choices about the products and services they use.
Environmental Awareness: A strong environmental ethic would be ingrained in society, with people understanding the importance of sustainability and their role in preserving the planet.

4. Governance and Policy:

Regulations and Standards: Strict regulations and standards would be in place to ensure that all sectors adhere to sustainable practices.
Incentives and Support: Governments might provide incentives and support for the development and adoption of sustainable technologies.
Global Cooperation: International cooperation would be essential for addressing global environmental challenges and ensuring the widespread adoption of sustainable practices.

5. Continuous Improvement:

Research and Development: Continuous research and development would be crucial for improving existing sustainable technologies and developing new ones.
Monitoring and Evaluation: Systems would be in place to monitor the effectiveness of sustainable technologies and make adjustments as needed.
Adaptation and Resilience: Sustainable technologies would be designed to be adaptable and resilient in the face of environmental changes and unforeseen challenges.

In essence, sustainable technology in 4180 would be a fundamental part of society, woven into its infrastructure, economy, and culture. It would be a way of life, driven by the need to protect the planet and ensure a prosperous future for all.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 4180 ?

It’s impossible to provide a real case study of sustainable technology in 4180 because, well, it doesn’t exist yet! However, we can create a hypothetical case study based on the trends and possibilities we’ve discussed. This allows us to explore how such technologies might function in a future context.

Hypothetical Case Study: The Neo-Alexandria Eco-City Project (4180)

Background: By the 42nd century, coastal cities are largely submerged due to rising sea levels. The Neo-Alexandria Eco-City Project is a large-scale effort to reclaim and sustainably inhabit a region previously lost to the sea.

Challenge: Re-establishing a thriving urban center while minimizing environmental impact and ensuring long-term resilience.

Sustainable Technology Solutions Implemented:

Energy: The city is powered entirely by a compact, high-efficiency fusion reactor located offshore. Smart grids, managed by AI, distribute power optimally, prioritizing energy efficiency and minimizing waste. Buildings are equipped with micro-energy generation systems (solar, kinetic) as backup and to supplement the main grid.
Water: A closed-loop water system recycles and purifies all water used in the city. Atmospheric water generators capture moisture from the air, supplementing the recycled water supply. Advanced filtration and purification technologies ensure water quality.
Food: Vertical farms and hydroponic gardens within the city provide fresh produce for the population. Cultivated meat production facilities, using minimal resources, provide protein. Waste from food production is composted and used to enrich the soil in urban farms.
Housing: Buildings are constructed from sustainable, self-healing biomaterials. They are designed to be energy-efficient, with integrated insulation, smart climate control systems, and green roofs. 3D printing technology allows for on-demand customization and construction.
Transportation: Personal transportation within the city is primarily via electric, autonomous vehicles that utilize a network of dedicated underground tunnels and elevated magnetic levitation tracks. High-speed maglev trains connect Neo-Alexandria to other eco-cities. Flying vehicles are reserved for essential services and long-distance travel, powered by advanced biofuel.
Waste Management: A zero-waste system is in place. Advanced recycling and composting facilities process all waste, converting it into reusable materials or energy. Bioplastics and biodegradable materials are used extensively, minimizing the need for traditional plastics.
Environmental Monitoring & Management: A network of sensors and AI systems constantly monitors the city’s environment, tracking air and water quality, energy usage, and resource consumption. This data is used to optimize the city’s systems and ensure its long-term sustainability.

Results:

Neo-Alexandria thrives as a self-sufficient and resilient urban center.
Its carbon footprint is negligible.
Resource consumption is minimized.
The city serves as a model for other sustainable urban development projects.

Conclusion:

This hypothetical case study demonstrates how a combination of advanced sustainable technologies, integrated systems, and societal shifts could enable the creation of thriving, environmentally responsible cities in the future. While the specifics are speculative, the underlying principles of sustainability, resource efficiency, and technological innovation are essential for ensuring a positive future for humanity

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

White paper on Sustainable technology of 4180 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 4180: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 4180. Building upon current trends and extrapolating advancements across various fields, we present a vision of a future where sustainability is deeply integrated into all aspects of life. We examine potential solutions for energy, resource management, infrastructure, and societal well-being, acknowledging the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead.

1. Introduction:

The 42nd century presents both immense challenges and unprecedented opportunities. Climate change, resource depletion, and population growth necessitate a fundamental shift towards sustainable practices. This paper envisions a future where technological advancements, coupled with societal changes, have enabled humanity to achieve a harmonious relationship with the planet.

2. Energy:

Fusion Power Dominance: Fusion energy, long a promise, is a mature and widely deployed technology. Safe, efficient, and virtually limitless, it powers cities, industries, and transportation systems.
Smart Grids and Microgrids: AI-powered smart grids optimize energy distribution, minimizing waste and maximizing efficiency. Decentralized microgrids provide resilience and localized energy generation.
Space-Based Solar Power: Large-scale solar arrays in orbit capture abundant solar energy and beam it to Earth, supplementing terrestrial sources.

3. Resource Management:

Circular Economy: A closed-loop system minimizes waste and maximizes resource utilization. Products are designed for disassembly and reuse, with materials recycled and repurposed endlessly.
Advanced Recycling Technologies: Nanotechnology and advanced chemical processes enable the efficient extraction of valuable materials from waste streams.
Resource Optimization through AI: AI algorithms analyze consumption patterns and optimize resource allocation, preventing shortages and minimizing environmental impact.

4. Infrastructure:

Self-Healing Materials: Buildings and infrastructure are constructed from self-healing biomaterials that repair damage automatically, extending lifespan and reducing maintenance needs.
Smart Cities: Urban centers are integrated systems, utilizing data and AI to optimize traffic flow, manage resources, and enhance quality of life.
Sustainable Transportation: High-speed maglev trains, electric autonomous vehicles, and advanced air mobility systems powered by clean energy provide efficient and sustainable transportation options.

5. Food and Agriculture:

Vertical Farming and Controlled Environment Agriculture: Urban farms and controlled environment agriculture maximize food production while minimizing land and water usage.
Precision Agriculture: Advanced sensors and AI optimize crop yields and reduce the need for fertilizers and pesticides.
Cultivated Meat and Alternative Proteins: Sustainable protein sources reduce reliance on traditional animal agriculture, minimizing environmental impact.

6. Healthcare and Well-being:

Personalized Medicine: Nanotechnology and AI enable early disease detection and personalized treatment plans.
Biotechnology and Regenerative Medicine: Advanced therapies and regenerative medicine extend lifespans and improve quality of life.
Mental Health and Well-being: Technology plays a role in promoting mental health and well-being, through personalized support systems and virtual reality therapies.

7. Societal Transformation:

Environmental Consciousness: A strong environmental ethic is ingrained in society, with individuals actively participating in sustainable practices.
Sustainable Consumption: Consumption patterns shift towards mindful and sustainable choices, prioritizing quality, durability, and shared resources.
Global Cooperation: International collaboration is essential for addressing global environmental challenges and ensuring equitable access to sustainable technologies.

8. Challenges and Opportunities:

Technological Development: Continued investment in research and development is crucial for realizing the full potential of sustainable technologies.
Ethical Considerations: Careful consideration must be given to the ethical implications of advanced technologies, ensuring fairness, transparency, and responsible use.
Social Equity: Access to sustainable technologies and resources must be equitable, preventing disparities and ensuring a just transition to a sustainable future.

9. Conclusion:

The vision of sustainable technology in 4180 presented in this white paper is ambitious but achievable. By embracing innovation, fostering collaboration, and prioritizing environmental stewardship, humanity can create a future where technology and nature coexist in harmony, ensuring a thriving planet for generations to come. This requires a continuous commitment to research, development, and implementation of sustainable solutions, driven by a shared vision of a better future.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 4180 ?

It’s fascinating to imagine the industrial applications of sustainable technology in 4180! Here are some possibilities, keeping in mind that this is speculative but based on current trends:

1. Advanced Manufacturing:

Closed-loop Production Systems: Factories would operate on closed-loop principles, minimizing waste and pollution. Raw materials would be sourced sustainably, and byproducts would be reused or recycled within the production process.
AI-Powered Optimization: AI would play a crucial role in optimizing manufacturing processes, from design and production to supply chain management. This would lead to increased efficiency, reduced energy consumption, and minimized resource usage.
Biomanufacturing: Biomanufacturing, using biological systems to produce materials and products, would be widespread. This could involve growing materials like bioplastics or even manufacturing complex products using engineered microorganisms.
3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing: On-demand production through advanced 3D printing would minimize waste and allow for highly customized products, reducing the need for mass production and transportation.

2. Resource Extraction and Processing:

Sustainable Mining: Mining operations would be highly automated and utilize advanced techniques to minimize environmental impact. This could involve in-situ mining, where resources are extracted without removing large amounts of earth, and the use of AI to optimize extraction processes.
Advanced Material Recovery: Technologies would be in place to efficiently recover valuable materials from waste streams, including rare earth elements and precious metals. This would reduce the need for new mining operations and contribute to a circular economy.
Renewable Resource Utilization: Industries would rely heavily on renewable resources, such as biomass and recycled materials. Advanced processing techniques would be used to convert these resources into valuable products.

3. Energy-Intensive Industries:

Carbon-Neutral Production: Industries like steel and cement production, which are currently energy-intensive and contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions, would need to adopt carbon-neutral technologies. This could involve the use of hydrogen as a fuel source or carbon capture and utilization technologies.
Renewable Energy Integration: Energy-intensive industries would be powered by a mix of renewable energy sources, including fusion power, space-based solar power, and advanced geothermal energy.
Energy Efficiency: Energy efficiency would be a top priority in all industrial processes. This could involve the use of advanced materials, such as superconductors, to reduce energy loss in electrical systems, and the implementation of smart energy management systems.

4. Infrastructure Development:

Sustainable Construction: Construction would rely on sustainable materials, such as self-healing biomaterials and recycled materials. 3D printing and advanced robotics would enable the construction of complex structures with minimal waste and labor.
Smart Infrastructure: Infrastructure systems, such as transportation networks and energy grids, would be integrated with AI and sensors to optimize performance and resource usage. This would lead to increased efficiency, reduced maintenance needs, and improved resilience.
Resilient Infrastructure: Infrastructure would be designed to withstand the impacts of climate change, such as extreme weather events and sea-level rise. This could involve the use of advanced materials and construction techniques, as well as the implementation of adaptive management strategies.

5. Biotechnology and Agriculture:

Sustainable Agriculture: Industrial agriculture would shift towards more sustainable practices, such as precision agriculture, vertical farming, and controlled environment agriculture. This would increase food production while minimizing land and water usage and reducing the need for fertilizers and pesticides.
Biotechnology Applications: Biotechnology would play a significant role in various industries, from the production of biofuels and bioplastics to the development of new medicines and agricultural products. This could involve the use of synthetic biology and genetic engineering to create sustainable solutions for various challenges.

These are just a few examples of the many potential industrial applications of sustainable technology in 4180. The key takeaway is that sustainability would be deeply integrated into all aspects of industry, driven by the need to protect the environment, conserve resources, and ensure a thriving future for humanity.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 4180 ?

You’re asking about the cutting edge of the far future! It’s a thought-provoking question, as R&D in 4180 would be vastly different from today. Here’s a glimpse into what it might entail:

1. Fundamental Science:

Unified Field Theory: Scientists might have achieved a complete understanding of the fundamental forces of nature, leading to breakthroughs in energy, materials science, and even space travel.
Consciousness and AI: Research into consciousness and its relationship to artificial intelligence could lead to the development of truly sentient AI, with profound implications for society.
Quantum Computing: Quantum computing would be far more advanced, enabling the simulation of complex systems and the development of new materials and technologies with unprecedented properties.

2. Sustainable Technologies:

Advanced Energy Systems: Research would focus on improving the efficiency and safety of fusion power, as well as exploring new energy sources, such as zero-point energy or harnessing energy from other dimensions (if such a thing exists!).
Biomanufacturing and Synthetic Biology: Scientists would be able to design and engineer biological systems to produce a wide range of materials and products sustainably, from bioplastics to advanced medicines.
Environmental Remediation: Research would focus on developing technologies to reverse the effects of climate change and restore damaged ecosystems. This could involve advanced carbon capture and sequestration techniques, as well as geoengineering projects.

3. Space Exploration and Colonization:

Interstellar Travel: Research would be dedicated to developing technologies for interstellar travel, such as warp drives or other advanced propulsion systems.
Space Colonization: Scientists would be working on creating self-sustaining colonies on other planets or in space, with the goal of expanding humanity’s reach beyond Earth.
Resource Utilization in Space: Research would focus on developing technologies to extract and utilize resources from asteroids, moons, and other celestial bodies.

4. Human Enhancement and Longevity:

Genetic Engineering: Advanced genetic engineering techniques could be used to enhance human capabilities, such as intelligence, strength, and longevity.
Brain-Computer Interfaces: Research into brain-computer interfaces could lead to seamless communication between humans and machines, with applications in everything from education to healthcare.
Regenerative Medicine: Scientists might have developed the ability to regenerate damaged tissues and organs, effectively reversing the aging process.

5. Social and Ethical Considerations:

Sustainable Societies: Researchers would be studying how to create sustainable societies that can thrive in the long term, considering factors such as population growth, resource management, and social equity.
Ethical Implications of Technology: Ethicists and social scientists would be working to understand the potential impacts of advanced technologies on society and to develop guidelines for their responsible use.
Human-Technology Coevolution: Research would explore the evolving relationship between humans and technology, considering how technology shapes human behavior and how humans adapt to a technologically advanced world.

How R&D Might Function:

Global Collaboration: Research and development would be a highly collaborative endeavor, with scientists from all over the world working together to solve global challenges.
Interdisciplinary Approach: Researchers would come from a wide range of disciplines, including science, engineering, social sciences, and the humanities, working together to address complex problems.
Advanced Tools and Technologies: Scientists would have access to incredibly advanced tools and technologies, such as quantum computers, nanotechnology manipulators, and virtual reality environments for simulating complex systems.
Long-Term Perspective: Research would be conducted with a long-term perspective, focusing on solving fundamental problems and creating a sustainable future for generations to come.

It’s important to remember that this is just a speculative vision of what research and development might look like in 4180. The actual path of technological and societal development could be very different. However, the pursuit of knowledge, innovation, and sustainability will likely remain central to human endeavor, driving us towards a future where technology and nature coexist in harmony.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 5–6.
^ Zhang, Wei; Li, Binshuai; Xue, Rui; Wang, Chengcheng; Cao, Wei (2021). “A systematic bibliometric review of clean energy transition: Implications for low-carbon development”. PLOS ONE. 16 (12): e0261091. Bibcode:2021PLoSO..1661091Z. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0261091. PMC 8641874. PMID 34860855.
^ United Nations Development Programme 2016, p. 5.
^ “Definitions: energy, sustainability and the future”. OpenLearn. The Open University. Archived from the original on 27 January 2021. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
^ Golus̆in, Popov & Dodić 2013, p. 8.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Hammond, Geoffrey P.; Jones, Craig I. “Sustainability criteria for energy resources and technologies”. In Galarraga, González-Eguino & Markandya (2011), pp. 21–47.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNECE 2020, pp. 3–4.
^ Gunnarsdottir, I.; Davidsdottir, B.; Worrell, E.; Sigurgeirsdottir, S. (May 2021). “Sustainable energy development: History of the concept and emerging themes”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 141: 110770. Bibcode:2021RSERv.14110770G. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110770. hdl:1874/411740.
^ Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 1–2.
^ Vera, Ivan; Langlois, Lucille (2007). “Energy indicators for sustainable development”. Energy. 32 (6): 875–882. Bibcode:2007Ene….32..875V. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2006.08.006.
^ Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 3–5.
^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2021). “What are the safest and cleanest sources of energy?”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 15 January 2024. Data sources: Markandya & Wilkinson (2007); UNSCEAR (2008; 2018); Sovacool et al. (2016); IPCC AR5 (2014); Pehl et al. (2017); Ember Energy (2021).
^ Jump up to:^a ^b United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. 46.
^ “Global Historical Emissions”. Climate Watch. Archived from the original on 4 June 2021. Retrieved 19 August 2021.
^ Ge, Mengpin; Friedrich, Johannes; Vigna, Leandro (August 2021). “4 Charts Explain Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Countries and Sectors”. World Resources Institute. Archived from the original on 19 August 2021. Retrieved 19 August 2021.
^ “The Paris Agreement”. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Archived from the original on 19 March 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
^ Watts, Nick; Amann, Markus; Arnell, Nigel; Ayeb-Karlsson, Sonja; et al. (2021). “The 2020 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: responding to converging crises” (PDF). The Lancet. 397 (10269): 151. Bibcode:2021Lanc..397..129W. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32290-X. PMC 7616803. PMID 33278353.
^ “Every breath you take: The staggering, true cost of air pollution”. United Nations Development Programme. 4 June 2019. Archived from the original on 20 April 2021. Retrieved 4 May 2021.
^ “New WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines aim to save millions of lives from air pollution”. World Health Organization. 22 September 2021. Archived from the original on 23 September 2021. Retrieved 16 October 2021.
^ “Acid Rain and Water”. United States Geological Survey. Archived from the original on 27 June 2021. Retrieved 14 October 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b World Health Organization 2018, p. 16.
^ “Ambient (outdoor) air pollution”. World Health Organization. 22 September 2021. Archived from the original on 8 October 2021. Retrieved 22 October 2021.
^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2019). “Access to Energy”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 1 April 2021. Retrieved 1 April 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b World Health Organization 2016, pp. vii–xiv.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 118.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, pp. 470–472.
^ Tester et al. 2012, p. 504.
^ Kessides, Ioannis N.; Toman, Michael (28 July 2011). “The Global Energy Challenge”. World Bank. Archived from the original on 25 July 2019. Retrieved 27 September 2019.
^ Morris et al. 2015, pp. 24–27.
^ “Access to clean cooking”. SDG7: Data and Projections. IEA. October 2020. Archived from the original on 6 December 2019. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
^ IEA 2021, p. 167.
^ Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu (20 July 2022). “Winners and losers of energy sustainability—Global assessment of the Sustainable Development Goals”. Science of the Total Environment. 831. 154945. Bibcode:2022ScTEn.83154945S. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154945. hdl:11250/3023660. PMID 35367559.
^ Deputy Secretary-General (6 June 2018). “Sustainable Development Goal 7 on Reliable, Modern Energy ‘Golden Thread’ Linking All Other Targets, Deputy-Secretary-General Tells High-Level Panel” (Press release). United Nations. Archived from the original on 17 May 2021. Retrieved 19 March 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Goal 7: Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all”. SDG Tracker. Archived from the original on 2 February 2021. Retrieved 12 March 2021.
^ “Energy use per person”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 28 November 2020. Retrieved 16 July 2021.
^ “Europe 2030: Energy saving to become “first fuel””. EU Science Hub. European Commission. 25 February 2016. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
^ Motherway, Brian (19 December 2019). “Energy efficiency is the first fuel, and demand for it needs to grow”. IEA. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
^ “Energy Efficiency 2018: Analysis and outlooks to 2040”. IEA. October 2018. Archived from the original on 29 September 2020.
^ Fernandez Pales, Araceli; Bouckaert, Stéphanie; Abergel, Thibaut; Goodson, Timothy (10 June 2021). “Net zero by 2050 hinges on a global push to increase energy efficiency”. IEA. Archived from the original on 20 July 2021. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA 2021, pp. 68–69.
^ Mundaca, Luis; Ürge-Vorsatz, Diana; Wilson, Charlie (February 2019). “Demand-side approaches for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C”. Energy Efficiency. 12 (2): 343–362. Bibcode:2019EnEff..12..343M. doi:10.1007/s12053-018-9722-9.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA, IRENA, United Nations Statistics Division, World Bank, World Health Organization 2021, p. 12.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA, IRENA, United Nations Statistics Division, World Bank, World Health Organization 2021, p. 11.
^ Brockway, Paul E.; Sorrell, Steve; Semieniuk, Gregor; Heun, Matthew Kuperus; Court, Victor (May 2021). “Energy efficiency and economy-wide rebound effects: A review of the evidence and its implications”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 141: 110781. Bibcode:2021RSERv.14110781B. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110781.
^ “Energy Efficiency 2019”. IEA. November 2019. Archived from the original on 13 October 2020. Retrieved 21 September 2020.
^ Bond, Kingsmill; Butler-Sloss, Sam; Lovins, Amory; Speelman, Laurens; Topping, Nigel (13 June 2023). “Report / 2023 / X-Change: Electricity / On track for disruption”. Rocky Mountain Institute. Archived from the original on 13 July 2023.
^ Source for data beginning in 2017: “Renewable Energy Market Update Outlook for 2023 and 2024” (PDF). International Energy Agency. June 2023. p. 19. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 July 2023. IEA. CC BY 4.0. ● Source for data through 2016: “Renewable Energy Market Update / Outlook for 2021 and 2022” (PDF). IEA.org. International Energy Agency. May 2021. p. 8. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 March 2023. IEA. Licence: CC BY 4.0
^ “World Energy Investment 2023 / Overview and key findings”. International Energy Agency (IEA). 25 May 2023. Archived from the original on 31 May 2023. Global energy investment in clean energy and in fossil fuels, 2015-2023 (chart) — From pages 8 and 12 of World Energy Investment 2023 (archive).
^ IEA 2007, p. 3.
^ Santangeli, Andrea; Toivonen, Tuuli; Pouzols, Federico Montesino; Pogson, Mark; Hastings, Astley; Smith, Pete; Moilanen, Atte (September 2016). “Global change synergies and trade-offs between renewable energy and biodiversity”. GCB Bioenergy. 8 (5): 941–951. Bibcode:2016GCBBi…8..941S. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12299. hdl:2164/6138.
^ Rehbein, Jose A.; Watson, James E. M.; Lane, Joe L.; Sonter, Laura J.; Venter, Oscar; Atkinson, Scott C.; Allan, James R. (May 2020). “Renewable energy development threatens many globally important biodiversity areas”. Global Change Biology. 26 (5): 3040–3051. Bibcode:2020GCBio..26.3040R. doi:10.1111/gcb.15067. PMID 32133726.
^ Ritchie, Hannah (2019). “Renewable Energy”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 4 August 2020. Retrieved 31 July 2020.
^ Renewables 2020 Analysis and forecast to 2025 (PDF) (Report). IEA. 2020. p. 12. Archived from the original on 26 April 2021.
^ “Access to electricity”. SDG7: Data and Projections. IEA. 2020. Archived from the original on 13 May 2021. Retrieved 5 May 2021.
^ “Infrastructure Solutions: The power of purchase agreements”. European Investment Bank. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
^ “Renewable Power – Analysis”. IEA. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
^ “Global Electricity Review 2022”. Ember. 29 March 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
^ “Renewable Energy and Electricity | Sustainable Energy | Renewable Energy – World Nuclear Association”. world-nuclear.org. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA (2022), Renewables 2022, IEA, Paris https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2022, License: CC BY 4.0
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 406.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Wind & Solar Share in Electricity Production Data”. Global Energy Statistical Yearbook 2021. Enerdata. Archived from the original on 19 July 2019. Retrieved 13 June 2021.
^ Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 34–35.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Levelized Cost of Energy and of Storage”. Lazard. 19 October 2020. Archived from the original on 25 February 2021. Retrieved 26 February 2021.
^ Victoria, Marta; Haegel, Nancy; Peters, Ian Marius; Sinton, Ron; Jäger-Waldau, Arnulf; del Cañizo, Carlos; Breyer, Christian; Stocks, Matthew; Blakers, Andrew; Kaizuka, Izumi; Komoto, Keiichi; Smets, Arno (May 2021). “Solar photovoltaics is ready to power a sustainable future”. Joule. 5 (5): 1041–1056. Bibcode:2021Joule…5.1041V. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2021.03.005.
^ IRENA 2021, pp. 19, 22.
^ Goetz, Katelyn P.; Taylor, Alexander D.; Hofstetter, Yvonne J.; Vaynzof, Yana (13 January 2021). “Sustainability in Perovskite Solar Cells”. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 13 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1021/acsami.0c17269. PMID 33372760.
^ Xu, Yan; Li, Jinhui; Tan, Quanyin; Peters, Anesia Lauren; Yang, Congren (May 2018). “Global status of recycling waste solar panels: A review”. Waste Management. 75: 450–458. Bibcode:2018WaMan..75..450X. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.01.036. PMID 29472153.
^ Tian, Xueyu; Stranks, Samuel D.; You, Fengqi (31 July 2020). “Life cycle energy use and environmental implications of high-performance perovskite tandem solar cells”. Science Advances. 6 (31): eabb0055. Bibcode:2020SciA….6…55T. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb0055. PMC 7399695. PMID 32789177.
^ Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2019, pp. 35–36.
^ “Solar energy”. International Renewable Energy Agency. Archived from the original on 13 May 2021. Retrieved 5 June 2021.
^ REN21 2020, p. 124.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 366.
^ “What are the advantages and disadvantages of offshore wind farms?”. American Geosciences Institute. 12 May 2016. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
^ Szarka 2007, p. 176.
^ Wang, Shifeng; Wang, Sicong (September 2015). “Impacts of wind energy on environment: A review”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 49: 437–443. Bibcode:2015RSERv..49..437W. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.137.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 215.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, p. 213.
^ Huang, Yu-Fong; Gan, Xing-Jia; Chiueh, Pei-Te (March 2017). “Life cycle assessment and net energy analysis of offshore wind power systems”. Renewable Energy. 102: 98–106. Bibcode:2017REne..102…98H. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2016.10.050.
^ Belton, Padraig (7 February 2020). “What happens to all the old wind turbines?”. BBC. Archived from the original on 23 February 2021. Retrieved 27 February 2021.
^ Smil 2017b, p. 286.
^ REN21 2021, p. 21.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Moran, Emilio F.; Lopez, Maria Claudia; Moore, Nathan; Müller, Norbert; Hyndman, David W. (20 November 2018). “Sustainable hydropower in the 21st century”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115 (47): 11891–11898. Bibcode:2018PNAS..11511891M. doi:10.1073/pnas.1809426115. PMC 6255148. PMID 30397145.
^ Kumar, A.; Schei, T.; Ahenkorah, A.; Caceres Rodriguez, R. et al. “Hydropower“. In IPCC (2011), pp. 451, 462, 488.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Schlömer, S.; Bruckner, T.; Fulton, L.; Hertwich, E. et al. “Annex III: Technology-specific cost and performance parameters“. In IPCC (2014), p. 1335.
^ Almeida, Rafael M.; Shi, Qinru; Gomes-Selman, Jonathan M.; Wu, Xiaojian; Xue, Yexiang; Angarita, Hector; Barros, Nathan; Forsberg, Bruce R.; García-Villacorta, Roosevelt; Hamilton, Stephen K.; Melack, John M.; Montoya, Mariana; Perez, Guillaume; Sethi, Suresh A.; Gomes, Carla P.; Flecker, Alexander S. (19 September 2019). “Reducing greenhouse gas emissions of Amazon hydropower with strategic dam planning”. Nature Communications. 10 (1): 4281. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12179-5. PMC 6753097. PMID 31537792.
^ László, Erika (1981). “Geothermal Energy: An Old Ally”. Ambio. 10 (5): 248–249. JSTOR 4312703.
^ REN21 2020, p. 97.
^ “Geothermal Energy Information and Facts”. National Geographic. 19 October 2009. Archived from the original on 8 August 2021. Retrieved 8 August 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2020). “Energy mix”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 2 July 2021. Retrieved 9 July 2021.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, pp. 222, 228.
^ Soysal & Soysal 2020, pp. 228–229.
^ “Biomass explained”. US Energy Information Administration. 8 June 2021. Archived from the original on 15 September 2021. Retrieved 13 September 2021.
^ Kopetz, Heinz (7 February 2013). “Build a biomass energy market”. Nature. 494 (7435): 29–31. doi:10.1038/494029a. PMID 23389528.
^ Demirbas, Ayhan (August 2008). “Biofuels sources, biofuel policy, biofuel economy and global biofuel projections”. Energy Conversion and Management. 49 (8): 2106–2116. Bibcode:2008ECM….49.2106D. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2008.02.020.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Correa, Diego F.; Beyer, Hawthorne L.; Fargione, Joseph E.; Hill, Jason D.; Possingham, Hugh P.; Thomas-Hall, Skye R.; Schenk, Peer M. (June 2019). “Towards the implementation of sustainable biofuel production systems”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 107: 250–263. Bibcode:2019RSERv.107..250C. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.005.
^ Daley, Jason (24 April 2018). “The EPA Declared That Burning Wood Is Carbon Neutral. It’s Actually a Lot More Complicated”. Smithsonian Magazine. Archived from the original on 30 June 2021. Retrieved 14 September 2021.
^ Tester et al. 2012, p. 512.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Smil 2017a, p. 162.
^ World Health Organization 2016, p. 73.
^ IPCC 2014, p. 616.
^ “Biofuels explained: Ethanol”. US Energy Information Administration. 18 June 2020. Archived from the original on 14 May 2021. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
^ Foley, Jonathan (5 March 2013). “It’s Time to Rethink America’s Corn System”. Scientific American. Archived from the original on 3 January 2020. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
^ Ayompe, Lacour M.; Schaafsma, M.; Egoh, Benis N. (January 2021). “Towards sustainable palm oil production: The positive and negative impacts on ecosystem services and human wellbeing”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 278: 123914. Bibcode:2021JCPro.27823914A. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123914.
^ Lustgarten, Abrahm (20 November 2018). “Palm Oil Was Supposed to Help Save the Planet. Instead It Unleashed a Catastrophe”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 17 May 2019. Retrieved 15 May 2019.
^ Smil 2017a, p. 161.
^ National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2019, p. 3.
^ REN21 2021, pp. 113–116.
^ “The Role of Gas: Key Findings”. IEA. July 2019. Archived from the original on 1 September 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
^ “Natural gas and the environment”. US Energy Information Administration. Archived from the original on 2 April 2021. Retrieved 28 March 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Storrow, Benjamin. “Methane Leaks Erase Some of the Climate Benefits of Natural Gas”. Scientific American. Retrieved 31 May 2023.
^ Plumer, Brad (26 June 2019). “As Coal Fades in the U.S., Natural Gas Becomes the Climate Battleground”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 23 September 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
^ Gürsan, C.; de Gooyert, V. (March 2021). “The systemic impact of a transition fuel: Does natural gas help or hinder the energy transition?”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 138: 110552. Bibcode:2021RSERv.13810552G. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110552. hdl:2066/228782.
^ Budinis, Sara; Krevor, Samuel; Dowell, Niall Mac; Brandon, Nigel; Hawkes, Adam (November 2018). “An assessment of CCS costs, barriers and potential”. Energy Strategy Reviews. 22: 61–81. Bibcode:2018EneSR..22…61B. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2018.08.003.
^ “Zero-emission carbon capture and storage in power plants using higher capture rates”. IEA. 7 January 2021. Archived from the original on 30 March 2021. Retrieved 14 March 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Ritchie, Hannah (10 February 2020). “What are the safest and cleanest sources of energy?”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 29 November 2020. Retrieved 14 March 2021.
^ Evans, Simon (8 December 2017). “Solar, wind and nuclear have ‘amazingly low’ carbon footprints, study finds”. Carbon Brief. Archived from the original on 16 March 2021. Retrieved 15 March 2021.
^ IPCC 2018, 5.4.1.2.
^ IPCC AR6 WG3 2022, p. 38.
^ “Global Status Report 2024”. Global CCS Institute. pp. 57–58. Retrieved 19 October 2024. The report lists 50 facilities, of which 3 are direct air capture facilities and 3 are transport/storage facilities
^ Roser, Max (10 December 2020). “The world’s energy problem”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 21 July 2021. Retrieved 21 July 2021.
^ Rhodes, Richard (19 July 2018). “Why Nuclear Power Must Be Part of the Energy Solution”. Yale Environment 360. Yale School of the Environment. Archived from the original on 9 August 2021. Retrieved 24 July 2021.
^ “Nuclear Power in the World Today”. World Nuclear Association. June 2021. Archived from the original on 16 July 2021. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
^ Bailey, Ronald (10 May 2023). “New study: Nuclear power is humanity’s greenest energy option”. Reason.com. Retrieved 22 May 2023.
^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2020). “Nuclear Energy”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 20 July 2021. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
^ MacKay 2008, p. 162.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Gill, Matthew; Livens, Francis; Peakman, Aiden (2014). “Nuclear Fission”. Future Energy. pp. 135–149. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102886-5.00007-4. ISBN 978-0-08-102886-5.
^ Muellner, Nikolaus; Arnold, Nikolaus; Gufler, Klaus; Kromp, Wolfgang; Renneberg, Wolfgang; Liebert, Wolfgang (August 2021). “Nuclear energy – The solution to climate change?”. Energy Policy. 155: 112363. Bibcode:2021EnPol.15512363M. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112363.
^ IPCC 2018, 2.4.2.1.
^ Timmer, John (21 November 2020). “Why are nuclear plants so expensive? Safety’s only part of the story”. Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 28 April 2021. Retrieved 17 March 2021.
^ Technical assessment of nuclear energy with respect to the ‘do no significant harm’ criteria of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (‘Taxonomy Regulation’) (PDF) (Report). European Commission Joint Research Centre. 2021. p. 53. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 April 2021.
^ Locatelli, Giorgio; Mignacca, Benito (2020). “Small Modular Nuclear Reactors”. Future Energy. pp. 151–169. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102886-5.00008-6. ISBN 978-0-08-102886-5.
^ McGrath, Matt (6 November 2019). “Nuclear fusion is ‘a question of when, not if'”. BBC. Archived from the original on 25 January 2021. Retrieved 13 February 2021.
^ Amos, Jonathan (9 February 2022). “Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy”. BBC. Archived from the original on 1 March 2022. Retrieved 10 February 2022.
^ “Energy Transition Investment Now On Par with Fossil Fuel”. Bloomberg NEF (New Energy Finance). 10 February 2023. Archived from the original on 27 March 2023.
^ Jaccard 2020, pp. 202–203, Chapter 11 – “Renewables Have Won”.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d IPCC 2014, 7.11.3.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 106–110.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Evans, Simon; Gabbatiss, Josh (30 November 2020). “In-depth Q&A: Does the world need hydrogen to solve climate change?”. Carbon Brief. Archived from the original on 1 December 2020. Retrieved 1 December 2020.
^ Jaccard 2020, p. 203, Chapter 11 – “Renewables Have Won”.
^ “Reaching net zero emissions demands faster innovation, but we’ve already come a long way – Analysis”. International Energy Agency. 13 November 2023. Retrieved 30 April 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b IEA 2021, p. 15.
^ “Innovation – Energy System”. International Energy Agency. Retrieved 30 April 2024.
^ World Health Organization 2018, Executive Summary.
^ Vandyck, T.; Keramidas, K.; Kitous, A.; Spadaro, J.V.; et al. (2018). “Air quality co-benefits for human health and agriculture counterbalance costs to meet Paris Agreement pledges”. Nature Communications. 9 (1): 4939. Bibcode:2018NatCo…9.4939V. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06885-9. PMC 6250710. PMID 30467311.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations Environment Programme 2019, pp. 46–55.
^ IPCC 2018, p. 97.
^ Hopwood, David (May 2007). “Blueprint for sustainability?”. Refocus. 8 (3): 54–57. doi:10.1016/S1471-0846(07)70068-9.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. 47.
^ “Introduction to System Integration of Renewables”. IEA. Archived from the original on 15 May 2020. Retrieved 30 May 2020.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Blanco, Herib; Faaij, André (January 2018). “A review at the role of storage in energy systems with a focus on Power to Gas and long-term storage” (PDF). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 81: 1049–1086. Bibcode:2018RSERv..81.1049B. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.062.
^ REN21 2020, p. 177.
^ Bloess, Andreas; Schill, Wolf-Peter; Zerrahn, Alexander (February 2018). “Power-to-heat for renewable energy integration: A review of technologies, modeling approaches, and flexibility potentials”. Applied Energy. 212: 1611–1626. Bibcode:2018ApEn..212.1611B. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.073. hdl:10419/200120.
^ IEA 2020, p. 109.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Koohi-Fayegh, S.; Rosen, M.A. (February 2020). “A review of energy storage types, applications and recent developments”. Journal of Energy Storage. 27: 101047. Bibcode:2020JEnSt..2701047K. doi:10.1016/j.est.2019.101047.
^ Katz, Cheryl (17 December 2020). “The batteries that could make fossil fuels obsolete”. BBC. Archived from the original on 11 January 2021. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Climate change and batteries: the search for future power storage solutions” (PDF). Climate change: science and solutions. The Royal Society. 19 May 2021. Archived from the original on 16 October 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
^ Hunt, Julian D.; Byers, Edward; Wada, Yoshihide; Parkinson, Simon; Gernaat, David E. H. J.; Langan, Simon; van Vuuren, Detlef P.; Riahi, Keywan (19 February 2020). “Global resource potential of seasonal pumped hydropower storage for energy and water storage”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 947. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11..947H. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14555-y. PMC 7031375. PMID 32075965.
^ Balaraman, Kavya (12 October 2020). “To batteries and beyond: With seasonal storage potential, hydrogen offers ‘a different ballgame entirely'”. Utility Dive. Archived from the original on 18 January 2021. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
^ Cole, Laura (15 November 2020). “How to cut carbon out of your heating”. BBC. Archived from the original on 27 August 2021. Retrieved 31 August 2021.
^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2020). “Electricity Mix”. Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 13 October 2021. Retrieved 16 October 2021.
^ IPCC 2018, 2.4.2.2.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 167–169.
^ United Nations Development Programme 2016, p. 30.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Herrington, Richard (24 May 2021). “Mining our green future”. Nature Reviews Materials. 6 (6): 456–458. Bibcode:2021NatRM…6..456H. doi:10.1038/s41578-021-00325-9.
^ Mudd, Gavin M. “Metals and Elements Needed to Support Future Energy Systems”. In Letcher (2020), pp. 723–724.
^ Babbitt, Callie W. (August 2020). “Sustainability perspectives on lithium-ion batteries”. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 22 (6): 1213–1214. Bibcode:2020CTEP…22.1213B. doi:10.1007/s10098-020-01890-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c IPCC AR6 WG3 2022, pp. 91–92.
^ Evans, Simon; Gabbatiss, Josh (30 November 2020). “In-depth Q&A: Does the world need hydrogen to solve climate change?”. Carbon Brief. Archived from the original on 1 December 2020. Retrieved 1 December 2020.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Lewis, Alastair C. (10 June 2021). “Optimising air quality co-benefits in a hydrogen economy: a case for hydrogen-specific standards for NO x emissions”. Environmental Science: Atmospheres. 1 (5): 201–207. Bibcode:2021ESAt….1..201L. doi:10.1039/D1EA00037C. This article incorporates text from this source, which is available under the CC BY 3.0 license.
^ Reed, Stanley; Ewing, Jack (13 July 2021). “Hydrogen Is One Answer to Climate Change. Getting It Is the Hard Part”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 14 July 2021. Retrieved 14 July 2021.
^ IRENA 2019, p. 9.
^ Bonheure, Mike; Vandewalle, Laurien A.; Marin, Guy B.; Van Geem, Kevin M. (March 2021). “Dream or Reality? Electrification of the Chemical Process Industries”. CEP Magazine. American Institute of Chemical Engineers. Archived from the original on 17 July 2021. Retrieved 6 July 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Griffiths, Steve; Sovacool, Benjamin K.; Kim, Jinsoo; Bazilian, Morgan; Uratani, Joao M. (October 2021). “Industrial decarbonization via hydrogen: A critical and systematic review of developments, socio-technical systems and policy options”. Energy Research & Social Science. 80: 102208. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102208.
^ Palys, Matthew J.; Daoutidis, Prodromos (May 2020). “Using hydrogen and ammonia for renewable energy storage: A geographically comprehensive techno-economic study”. Computers & Chemical Engineering. 136: 106785. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106785.
^ IRENA 2021, pp. 12, 22.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 15, 75–76.
^ Kjellberg-Motton, Brendan (7 February 2022). “Steel decarbonisation gathers speed | Argus Media”. www.argusmedia.com. Retrieved 7 September 2023.
^ Blank, Thomas; Molly, Patrick (January 2020). “Hydrogen’s Decarbonization Impact for Industry” (PDF). Rocky Mountain Institute. pp. 2, 7, 8. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 September 2020.
^ Plötz, Patrick (31 January 2022). “Hydrogen technology is unlikely to play a major role in sustainable road transport”. Nature Electronics. 5 (1): 8–10. doi:10.1038/s41928-021-00706-6.
^ Fraser, Simon D.S.; Lock, Karen (December 2011). “Cycling for transport and public health: a systematic review of the effect of the environment on cycling”. European Journal of Public Health. 21 (6): 738–743. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckq145. PMID 20929903.
^ “Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data”. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 12 January 2016. Archived from the original on 5 December 2019. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
^ Bigazzi, Alexander (May 2019). “Comparison of marginal and average emission factors for passenger transportation modes”. Applied Energy. 242: 1460–1466. Bibcode:2019ApEn..242.1460B. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.172.
^ Schäfer, Andreas W.; Yeh, Sonia (20 April 2020). “A holistic analysis of passenger travel energy and greenhouse gas intensities”. Nature Sustainability. 3 (6): 459–462. Bibcode:2020NatSu…3..459S. doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0514-9.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2020, p. xxv.
^ IEA 2021, p. 137.
^ Pucher, John; Buehler, Ralph (2 November 2017). “Cycling towards a more sustainable transport future”. Transport Reviews. 37 (6): 689–694. doi:10.1080/01441647.2017.1340234.
^ Smith, John (22 September 2016). “Sustainable transport”. European Commission. Archived from the original on 22 October 2021. Retrieved 22 October 2021.
^ Knobloch, Florian; Hanssen, Steef V.; Lam, Aileen; Pollitt, Hector; Salas, Pablo; Chewpreecha, Unnada; Huijbregts, Mark A. J.; Mercure, Jean-Francois (23 March 2020). “Net emission reductions from electric cars and heat pumps in 59 world regions over time”. Nature Sustainability. 3 (6): 437–447. Bibcode:2020NatSu…3..437K. doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0488-7. PMC 7308170. PMID 32572385.
^ Bogdanov, Dmitrii; Farfan, Javier; Sadovskaia, Kristina; Aghahosseini, Arman; Child, Michael; Gulagi, Ashish; Oyewo, Ayobami Solomon; de Souza Noel Simas Barbosa, Larissa; Breyer, Christian (6 March 2019). “Radical transformation pathway towards sustainable electricity via evolutionary steps”. Nature Communications. 10 (1). doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08855-1. PMC 6403340. PMID 30842423.
^ Martini, Giorgio; Grigoratos, Theodoros (2014). Non-exhaust traffic related emissions – Brake and tyre wear PM. EUR 26648. Publications Office of the European Union. p. 42. ISBN 978-92-79-38303-8. OCLC 1044281650. Archived from the original on 30 July 2021.
^ Non-exhaust Particulate Emissions from Road Transport. 2020. pp. 8–9. doi:10.1787/4a4dc6ca-en. ISBN 978-92-64-45244-2.
^ “CO₂ performance of new passenger cars in Europe”. www.eea.europa.eu. Retrieved 19 October 2022.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 133–137.
^ “Rail and waterborne – best for low-carbon motorised transport”. European Environment Agency. Archived from the original on 9 October 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
^ Miller, Joe (9 September 2020). “Hydrogen takes a back seat to electric for passenger vehicles”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 20 September 2020. Retrieved 9 September 2020.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 136, 139.
^ Biomass in a low-carbon economy (Report). UK Committee on Climate Change. November 2018. p. 18. Archived from the original on 28 December 2019. Retrieved 28 December 2019.
^ “Buildings”. IEA. Archived from the original on 14 October 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
^ Mortensen, Anders Winther; Mathiesen, Brian Vad; Hansen, Anders Bavnhøj; Pedersen, Sigurd Lauge; Grandal, Rune Duban; Wenzel, Henrik (October 2020). “The role of electrification and hydrogen in breaking the biomass bottleneck of the renewable energy system – A study on the Danish energy system”. Applied Energy. 275: 115331. Bibcode:2020ApEn..27515331M. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115331.
^ Knobloch, Florian; Pollitt, Hector; Chewpreecha, Unnada; Daioglou, Vassilis; Mercure, Jean-Francois (February 2019). “Simulating the deep decarbonisation of residential heating for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C”. Energy Efficiency. 12 (2): 521–550. arXiv:1710.11019. Bibcode:2019EnEff..12..521K. doi:10.1007/s12053-018-9710-0.
^ Alva, Guruprasad; Lin, Yaxue; Fang, Guiyin (February 2018). “An overview of thermal energy storage systems”. Energy. 144: 341–378. Bibcode:2018Ene…144..341A. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.037.
^ Plumer, Brad (30 June 2021). “Are ‘Heat Pumps’ the Answer to Heat Waves? Some Cities Think So”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 10 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
^ Abergel, Thibaut (June 2020). “Heat Pumps”. IEA. Archived from the original on 3 March 2021. Retrieved 12 April 2021.
^ Buffa, Simone; Cozzini, Marco; D’Antoni, Matteo; Baratieri, Marco; et al. (2019). “5th generation district heating and cooling systems: A review of existing cases in Europe”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 104: 504–522. Bibcode:2019RSERv.104..504B. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.059.
^ Lund, Henrik; Werner, Sven; Wiltshire, Robin; Svendsen, Svend; et al. (2014). “4th Generation District Heating (4GDH)”. Energy. 68: 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.089. Archived from the original on 7 March 2021. Retrieved 13 June 2021.
^ Abdolhamidi, Shervin (27 September 2018). “An ancient engineering feat that harnessed the wind”. BBC. Archived from the original on 12 August 2021. Retrieved 12 August 2021.
^ “How cities are using nature to keep heatwaves at bay”. United Nations Environment Programme. 22 July 2020. Archived from the original on 11 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Four Things You Should Know About Sustainable Cooling”. World Bank. 23 May 2019. Archived from the original on 11 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
^ Mastrucci, Alessio; Byers, Edward; Pachauri, Shonali; Rao, Narasimha D. (March 2019). “Improving the SDG energy poverty targets: Residential cooling needs in the Global South”. Energy and Buildings. 186: 405–415. Bibcode:2019EneBu.186..405M. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.01.015.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Smith & Pillarisetti 2017, pp. 145–146.
^ “Cooking appliances”. Natural Resources Canada. 16 January 2013. Archived from the original on 30 July 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2021.
^ World Health Organization; International Energy Agency; Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves; United Nations Development Programme; Energising Development; and World Bank (2018). Accelerating SDG 7 Achievement Policy Brief 02: Achieving Universal Access to Clean and Modern Cooking Fuels, Technologies and Services (PDF) (Report). United Nations. p. 3. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 March 2021.
^ World Health Organization 2016, p. 75.
^ IPCC 2014, p. 29.
^ World Health Organization 2016, p. 12.
^ REN21 2020, p. 40.
^ IEA 2020, p. 135.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. 50.
^ Åhman, Max; Nilsson, Lars J.; Johansson, Bengt (4 July 2017). “Global climate policy and deep decarbonization of energy-intensive industries”. Climate Policy. 17 (5): 634–649. Bibcode:2017CliPo..17..634A. doi:10.1080/14693062.2016.1167009.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. xxiii.
^ IEA 2021, p. 186.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c United Nations Environment Programme 2019, pp. 39–45.
^ Jaccard 2020, p. 109, Chapter 6 – We Must Price Carbon Emissions”.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b United Nations Environment Programme 2019, pp. 28–36.
^ Ciucci, M. (February 2020). “Renewable Energy”. European Parliament. Archived from the original on 4 June 2020. Retrieved 3 June 2020.
^ “State Renewable Portfolio Standards and Goals”. National Conference of State Legislators. 17 April 2020. Archived from the original on 3 June 2020. Retrieved 3 June 2020.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 14–25.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 184–187.
^ IEA 2021, p. 16.
^ Jaccard 2020, pp. 106–109, Chapter 6 – “We Must Price Carbon Emissions”.
^ Plumer, Brad (8 October 2018). “New U.N. Climate Report Says Put a High Price on Carbon”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 27 September 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
^ Green, Jessica F (April 2021). “Does carbon pricing reduce emissions? A review of ex-post analyses”. Environmental Research Letters. 16 (4): 043004. Bibcode:2021ERL….16d3004G. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abdae9.
^ IPCC 2018, 2.5.2.1.
^ State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2019 (PDF) (Report). World Bank. June 2019. pp. 8–11. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1435-8. hdl:10986/29687. ISBN 978-1-4648-1435-8. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 May 2020.
^ “Revenue-Neutral Carbon Tax | Canada”. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Archived from the original on 28 October 2019. Retrieved 28 October 2019.
^ Carr, Mathew (10 October 2018). “How High Does Carbon Need to Be? Somewhere From $20–$27,000”. Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 5 August 2019. Retrieved 4 October 2019.
^ “EAC launches new inquiry weighing up carbon border tax measures”. UK Parliament. 24 September 2021. Archived from the original on 24 September 2021. Retrieved 14 October 2021.
^ Plumer, Brad (14 July 2021). “Europe Is Proposing a Border Carbon Tax. What Is It and How Will It Work?”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 10 September 2021. Retrieved 10 September 2021.
^ Bharti, Bianca (12 August 2021). “Taxing imports of heavy carbon emitters is gaining momentum – and it could hurt Canadian industry: Report”. Financial Post. Archived from the original on 3 October 2021. Retrieved 3 October 2021.
^ United Nations Environment Programme 2020, p. vii.
^ IEA 2021, p. 13.
^ IEA 2021, pp. 14–18.
^ IRENA, IEA & REN21 2018, p. 19.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “24 million jobs to open up in the green economy”. International Labour Organization. 14 May 2018. Archived from the original on 2 June 2021. Retrieved 30 May 2021.
^ Catsaros, Oktavia (26 January 2023). “Global Low-Carbon Energy Technology Investment Surges Past $1 Trillion for the First Time”. Bloomberg NEF (New Energy Finance). Figure 1. Archived from the original on 22 May 2023. Defying supply chain disruptions and macroeconomic headwinds, 2022 energy transition investment jumped 31% to draw level with fossil fuels
^ “Global Clean Energy Investment Jumps 17%, Hits $1.8 Trillion in 2023, According to BloombergNEF Report”. BNEF.com. Bloomberg NEF. 30 January 2024. Archived from the original on 28 June 2024. Start years differ by sector but all sectors are present from 2020 onwards.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b 2024 data: “Energy Transition Investment Trends 2025 / Abridged report” (PDF). BloombergNEF. 30 January 2025. p. 9. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 February 2025.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Mazzucato, Mariana; Semieniuk, Gregor (February 2018). “Financing renewable energy: Who is financing what and why it matters”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 127: 8–22. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.021.
^ United Nations Development Programme & United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2019, p. 24.
^ IPCC 2018, p. 96.
^ IEA, IRENA, United Nations Statistics Division, World Bank, World Health Organization 2021, pp. 129, 132.
^ United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2018, p. 54.
^ United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2018, p. 9.
^ Roberts, J. Timmons; Weikmans, Romain; Robinson, Stacy-ann; Ciplet, David; Khan, Mizan; Falzon, Danielle (March 2021). “Rebooting a failed promise of climate finance”. Nature Climate Change. 11 (3): 180–182. Bibcode:2021NatCC..11..180R. doi:10.1038/s41558-021-00990-2.
^ Radwanski, Adam (29 September 2021). “Opinion: As pivotal climate summit approaches, Canada at centre of efforts to repair broken trust among poorer countries”. The Globe and Mail. Archived from the original on 30 September 2021. Retrieved 30 September 2021.
^ “Here are the clean energy innovations that will beat climate change”. European Investment Bank. Retrieved 26 September 2022.
^ “Home”. www.oecd-ilibrary.org. Retrieved 19 October 2022.
^ Bridle, Richard; Sharma, Shruti; Mostafa, Mostafa; Geddes, Anna (June 2019). “Fossil Fuel to Clean Energy Subsidy Swaps: How to pay for an energy revolution” (PDF). International Institute for Sustainable Development. p. iv. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 November 2019.
^ Watts, Nick; Amann, Markus; Arnell, Nigel; Ayeb-Karlsson, Sonja; Belesova, Kristine; Boykoff, Maxwell; Byass, Peter; Cai, Wenjia; Campbell-Lendrum, Diarmid; Capstick, Stuart; Chambers, Jonathan; Dalin, Carole; Daly, Meaghan; Dasandi, Niheer; Davies, Michael; Drummond, Paul; Dubrow, Robert; Ebi, Kristie L; Eckelman, Matthew; Ekins, Paul; Escobar, Luis E; Fernandez Montoya, Lucia; Georgeson, Lucien; Graham, Hilary; Haggar, Paul; Hamilton, Ian; Hartinger, Stella; Hess, Jeremy; Kelman, Ilan; Kiesewetter, Gregor; Kjellstrom, Tord; Kniveton, Dominic; Lemke, Bruno; Liu, Yang; Lott, Melissa; Lowe, Rachel; Sewe, Maquins Odhiambo; Martinez-Urtaza, Jaime; Maslin, Mark; McAllister, Lucy; McGushin, Alice; Jankin Mikhaylov, Slava; Milner, James; Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar; Morrissey, Karyn; Murray, Kris; Munzert, Simon; Nilsson, Maria; Neville, Tara; Oreszczyn, Tadj; Owfi, Fereidoon; Pearman, Olivia; Pencheon, David; Phung, Dung; Pye, Steve; Quinn, Ruth; Rabbaniha, Mahnaz; Robinson, Elizabeth; Rocklöv, Joacim; Semenza, Jan C; Sherman, Jodi; Shumake-Guillemot, Joy; Tabatabaei, Meisam; Taylor, Jonathon; Trinanes, Joaquin; Wilkinson, Paul; Costello, Anthony; Gong, Peng; Montgomery, Hugh (November 2019). “The 2019 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: ensuring that the health of a child born today is not defined by a changing climate”. The Lancet. 394 (10211): 1836–1878. Bibcode:2019Lanc..394.1836W. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32596-6. PMC 7616843. PMID 31733928.
^ United Nations Development Programme 2020, p. 10.
^ Kuzemko, Caroline; Bradshaw, Michael; Bridge, Gavin; Goldthau, Andreas; Jewell, Jessica; Overland, Indra; Scholten, Daniel; Van de Graaf, Thijs; Westphal, Kirsten (October 2020). “Covid-19 and the politics of sustainable energy transitions”. Energy Research & Social Science. 68: 101685. Bibcode:2020ERSS…6801685K. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101685. PMC 7330551. PMID 32839704.
^ IRENA 2021, p. 5.