Sustainable technology of 3860

69 / 100

Sustainable technology of 3860 ?

It seems like you’re asking about sustainable technology in the year 3860. That’s quite a leap into the future!

While it’s impossible to predict exactly what technology will look like that far ahead, we can make some educated guesses based on current trends and the principles of sustainability.

Here are some potential areas of focus for sustainable technology in 3860:

Closed-loop systems: By 3860, we might have perfected closed-loop systems for resource management. This means that resources are continuously recycled and reused, minimizing waste and the need for new extraction. Think of it like a self-sustaining ecosystem where everything is used and reused.
Advanced energy solutions: It’s likely that we’ll have moved far beyond fossil fuels and even current renewable energy technologies. Perhaps we’ll have harnessed new forms of energy that are abundant, clean, and safe. Imagine energy sources like zero-point energy or tapping into the Earth’s geothermal power in a more efficient way.
Biomimicry and bio-integrated technology: Technology might be seamlessly integrated with nature, drawing inspiration from biological systems. We could see buildings that grow like plants, materials that self-heal, and even technology that can be directly integrated with our bodies for health and communication.
Localized and personalized production: With advanced manufacturing technologies like 3D printing and nanotechnology, production could become highly localized and personalized. This would reduce the need for long supply chains and transportation, further minimizing environmental impact.
Artificial intelligence and automation: AI and automation could play a crucial role in optimizing resource use and minimizing waste. Smart systems could manage energy grids, transportation networks, and even our homes to ensure maximum efficiency and sustainability.

Challenges and Considerations:

Of course, there will be challenges in achieving these goals. We’ll need to consider:

Ethical implications: As technology advances, we’ll need to carefully consider the ethical implications of its use, especially in areas like AI and bio-integrated technology.
Accessibility and equity: It’s important to ensure that sustainable technologies are accessible to everyone, not just a privileged few.
Resilience: Future technologies should be resilient to potential disruptions, such as climate change impacts or resource scarcity.

Looking Ahead:

While we can’t know for sure what sustainable technology will look like in 3860, it’s clear that it will be essential for creating a thriving and equitable future for humanity. By continuing to innovate and prioritize sustainability, we can pave the way for a brighter future for generations to come.

Do you have any other questions about sustainable technology or the future? I’m here to help!

What is Sustainable technology of 3860 ?

Predicting the exact nature of sustainable technology in 3860 is a fascinating thought experiment! While we can’t know for sure, we can speculate based on current trends and the fundamental principles of sustainability. Here’s a breakdown of potential areas of focus:

1. Closed-loop Resource Systems:

Complete Recycling: By 3860, we might have perfected closed-loop systems for all resources. This means that everything is continuously recycled and reused, eliminating waste and the need for new resource extraction. Imagine a truly circular economy where materials are constantly transformed and repurposed.
Resource Optimization: Advanced AI and automation could manage resource flows with incredible precision, ensuring that every atom is used efficiently and effectively.

2. Advanced Energy Solutions:

Beyond Renewables: It’s likely we’ll have moved beyond current renewable energy technologies. Perhaps we’ll have harnessed new, abundant, clean, and safe energy sources. Think of possibilities like zero-point energy or highly advanced geothermal energy extraction.
Energy Efficiency: Energy efficiency will be paramount. Buildings, transportation, and all aspects of life will be designed to minimize energy consumption.

3. Biomimicry and Bio-integrated Technology:

Nature-Inspired Design: Technology might seamlessly integrate with nature, drawing inspiration from biological systems. We could see buildings that grow like plants, materials that self-heal, and machines that function like living organisms.
Human-Technology Symbiosis: Technology could be directly integrated with our bodies for health, communication, and enhanced abilities. This raises ethical considerations, but the potential is vast.

4. Localized and Personalized Production:

Advanced Manufacturing: Technologies like 3D printing and nanotechnology could enable highly localized and personalized production. This would drastically reduce the need for long supply chains and transportation, minimizing environmental impact.
On-Demand Production: Imagine being able to create anything you need, from tools to food, using readily available resources and advanced manufacturing technologies.

5. Artificial Intelligence and Automation:

Optimized Resource Management: AI and automation could play a crucial role in optimizing resource use and minimizing waste. Smart systems could manage energy grids, transportation networks, and even our homes for maximum efficiency.
Environmental Monitoring and Protection: AI-powered systems could monitor the environment, detect pollution, and even take proactive measures to protect ecosystems.

Challenges and Considerations:

Ethical Implications: As technology advances, ethical considerations become even more critical. We’ll need to carefully navigate the implications of AI, bio-integrated technology, and other powerful tools.
Accessibility and Equity: Ensuring that sustainable technologies are accessible to everyone will be crucial for creating a just and equitable future.
Resilience: Future technologies should be resilient to potential disruptions, such as climate change impacts or resource scarcity.

Looking Ahead:

While we can’t predict the future with certainty, it’s clear that sustainable technology will be essential for creating a thriving and equitable world in 3860. By continuing to innovate and prioritize sustainability, we can pave the way for a brighter future for generations to come.

Who is required Sustainable technology of 3860 ?

The “requirement” for sustainable technology in 3860 isn’t about a specific person or group demanding it. It’s about the fundamental needs of humanity (and potentially other intelligent life) existing that far into the future. Think of it less as a demand and more as a necessity for survival and well-being.

Here’s a breakdown of why sustainable technology would be essential in 3860, and who would depend on it:

Human Civilization: The primary “requirer” is humanity itself. By 3860, assuming civilization continues, the planet’s resources will likely be vastly different than they are today. Sustainable technologies will be absolutely vital for:
- Resource Management: Ensuring access to clean water, food, energy, and materials in a closed-loop system.
- Environmental Stability: Maintaining a habitable planet by mitigating the effects of climate change, pollution, and resource depletion.
- Societal Well-being: Providing for the basic needs of a population, fostering health, and enabling progress.
Future Generations: Those living in 3860 will inherit the consequences of decisions made today and in the intervening centuries. They will depend on sustainable technologies to thrive and continue civilization.
Ecosystems and Biodiversity: While not “requiring” in the same way humans do, the health of the planet’s ecosystems will be intrinsically linked to the success of sustainable technologies. A healthy planet is essential for human survival.
Potentially Other Civilizations: If humanity has encountered or established contact with extraterrestrial life by 3860, the principles of sustainability would likely be crucial for interactions and co-existence. Sharing resources and minimizing environmental impact would be vital.

In essence, sustainable technology in 3860 is less about a specific entity making a demand and more about the fundamental conditions necessary for any advanced civilization to persist over such a long timescale. It’s a requirement imposed by the limits of the planet and the interconnectedness of life.

When is required Sustainable technology of 3860 ?

You’re asking a very important question about the timeline for sustainable technology in 3860! It’s not a single point in time, but rather an ongoing process that starts now and continues to evolve.

Here’s how we can think about the “when” in this context:

The Foundation is Being Laid Now: The need for sustainable technology in 3860 isn’t something that suddenly appears in that year. It’s being built right now, in 2025. Every innovation in renewable energy, resource recycling, and environmental protection is a step towards that future.
Continuous Development: The path to 3860 will involve centuries of research, development, and implementation. New technologies will emerge, existing ones will be refined, and our understanding of sustainability will deepen. It’s a continuous journey of improvement.
Adaptation and Response: The “when” also depends on how well we address the challenges of today and the coming centuries. Climate change, resource depletion, and population growth are pressing issues that demand immediate action. The sooner we embrace sustainable practices, the better prepared we’ll be for the future.
No Single “Arrival”: There won’t be a moment in 3860 where someone flips a switch and sustainable technology is “achieved.” It will be an integrated part of life, constantly evolving to meet the needs of the time.

**In essence, the “when” for sustainable technology in 3860 is:

Now: We need to start building the foundation today.
Continuously: It’s an ongoing process of innovation and adaptation.
Proactively: The sooner we act, the better the outcome.

It’s not about a destination, but a journey. Every generation will play a role in shaping the sustainable technologies of the future, culminating in what will be needed in 3860 and beyond.**

COURTESY : Voith Group

Where is required Sustainable technology of 3860 ?

That’s a great question that gets to the heart of why sustainable technology is so important! It’s not just about a specific location, but rather about creating a sustainable future for everywhere and everyone.

Here’s how we can think about the “where” in relation to sustainable technology in 3860:

Globally: Sustainable technology will be essential for maintaining a habitable planet as a whole. This includes:
- Atmosphere: Technologies to manage greenhouse gases, pollution, and maintain a healthy atmosphere.
- Oceans: Systems for cleaning and protecting oceans, managing marine resources, and mitigating the impacts of climate change.
- Land: Sustainable agriculture, forestry, and land management practices to ensure food security and biodiversity.
Locally: Sustainable technology will also need to be adapted to specific environments and communities. This means:
- Regional Solutions: Tailoring technologies to address the unique challenges of different ecosystems, climates, and geographies.
- Community-Based Initiatives: Empowering local communities to develop and implement sustainable solutions that meet their specific needs.
In Space: If humanity has expanded beyond Earth by 3860, sustainable technology will be crucial for:
- Off-World Habitats: Creating self-sustaining ecosystems on other planets or space stations.
- Resource Management: Utilizing resources from space in a sustainable way, minimizing environmental impact on other celestial bodies.
Everyday Life: Sustainable technology will be integrated into all aspects of daily life, including:
- Homes: Energy-efficient housing, smart appliances, and systems for water and waste management.
- Transportation: Sustainable transportation systems, such as electric vehicles or advanced forms of travel with minimal environmental impact.
- Industry: Sustainable manufacturing processes, closed-loop systems, and responsible resource use.

In essence, the “where” for sustainable technology in 3860 is everywhere:

From the global scale to local communities.
From the Earth’s surface to the depths of the oceans and potentially beyond.
In every aspect of human life, from the homes we live in to the industries that sustain us.

Sustainable technology is not just about protecting specific places, but about creating a sustainable future for all of humanity and the planet as a whole.

How is required Sustainable technology of 3860 ?

You’re asking about the methods and approaches that will be necessary to develop and implement sustainable technology in 3860. It’s a complex question, but we can explore some key aspects:

1. Building on Current Foundations:

Continuous Research and Development: The sustainable technologies of 3860 will be built upon the foundations laid by current research and development. This means investing in areas like renewable energy, materials science, biotechnology, and artificial intelligence today.
Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Solving the complex challenges of sustainability will require collaboration across many disciplines, including science, engineering, social sciences, and the humanities.

2. Embracing Innovation:

Thinking Outside the Box: We’ll need to be open to new ideas and approaches, even if they seem radical or unconventional. This could involve exploring new energy sources, developing new materials, or reimagining the way we live and interact with the planet.
Learning from Nature: Biomimicry, which involves drawing inspiration from biological systems, could play a crucial role in developing sustainable technologies. Nature has already solved many of the challenges we face, and we can learn from its wisdom.

3. Prioritizing Sustainability:

Life Cycle Assessment: We’ll need to consider the entire life cycle of technologies, from resource extraction to manufacturing, use, and disposal. This means designing technologies that are durable, repairable, and recyclable.
Minimizing Environmental Impact: Sustainable technologies should aim to minimize their impact on the environment, including reducing greenhouse gas emissions, conserving resources, and protecting biodiversity.

4. Fostering Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing:

Open-Source Innovation: Sharing knowledge and research findings can accelerate the development of sustainable technologies. Open-source platforms and collaborative research projects can play a valuable role.
Global Partnerships: Addressing the challenges of sustainability will require global cooperation. International collaborations can help to share resources, expertise, and best practices.

5. Adapting to Change:

Resilience: Sustainable technologies should be resilient to potential disruptions, such as climate change impacts or resource scarcity. This means designing systems that can adapt to changing conditions.
Flexibility: The needs of society and the environment may change over time. Sustainable technologies should be flexible enough to adapt to these changes.

In essence, the “how” of sustainable technology in 3860 involves:

Building on the present: Continuing research and development in key areas.
Embracing innovation: Being open to new ideas and learning from nature.
Prioritizing sustainability: Considering the entire life cycle of technologies and minimizing environmental impact.
Fostering collaboration: Sharing knowledge and working together on a global scale.
Adapting to change: Ensuring resilience and flexibility in the face of future challenges.

By combining these approaches, we can create a foundation for a sustainable future that will benefit generations to come.

Case study is Sustainable technology of 3860 ?

It’s tricky to create a specific case study for sustainable technology in 3860, as it would be largely speculative. However, we can build a hypothetical scenario based on current trends and extrapolate into the future. Let’s imagine a case study focusing on resource management in a densely populated urban environment in 3860:

Case Study: Eco-City Alpha – 3860

Background:

By 3860, many urban centers have evolved into “Eco-Cities” – self-contained, sustainable communities designed to minimize environmental impact and maximize resource efficiency. Eco-City Alpha, located in a region once known as Southeast Asia, is home to 5 million people. Due to rising sea levels and climate change, land is precious, and resources are carefully managed.

Challenge:

Eco-City Alpha faces the challenge of providing for its population while minimizing waste and maintaining a closed-loop resource system. This includes:

Food Production: Providing nutritious food for 5 million people within the city limits.
Water Management: Ensuring access to clean water in a region with fluctuating rainfall patterns.
Waste Recycling: Processing and reusing all waste generated by the city.
Energy Supply: Powering the city with clean and sustainable energy sources.

Solution:

Eco-City Alpha has implemented a range of sustainable technologies to address these challenges:

Vertical Farming: Multi-level vertical farms integrated into buildings utilize hydroponics and aeroponics to produce a variety of crops year-round, minimizing land use and water consumption.
Atmospheric Water Generation: Advanced systems capture moisture from the air and purify it for drinking and irrigation, reducing reliance on traditional water sources.
Waste-to-Resource Systems: AI-powered systems sort and process all waste, converting organic materials into fertilizer for vertical farms and recycling other materials for reuse in manufacturing.
Geothermal Energy: The city utilizes deep geothermal energy to provide a stable and clean source of power, supplemented by localized solar and wind energy generation.
AI-Driven Optimization: An integrated AI system monitors and manages all resource flows within the city, optimizing energy use, water distribution, and waste processing.

Results:

Food Security: Eco-City Alpha is self-sufficient in food production, providing a balanced and nutritious diet for its population.
Water Abundance: The city has access to ample clean water, even during periods of drought.
Zero Waste: Virtually all waste is recycled or reused, minimizing environmental impact and reducing the need for landfills.
Clean Energy: The city is powered by clean and sustainable energy sources, reducing its carbon footprint to near zero.
Thriving Ecosystem: Green spaces and natural ecosystems are integrated into the city’s design, promoting biodiversity and enhancing quality of life.

Lessons Learned:

Integrated Approach: Sustainable solutions require an integrated approach, considering all aspects of resource management and urban planning.
Technological Innovation: Continuous innovation is crucial for developing and improving sustainable technologies.
Community Engagement: Engaging citizens in sustainable practices is essential for the success of Eco-City Alpha.

Conclusion:

Eco-City Alpha serves as a model for sustainable urban development in 3860. By embracing innovative technologies and prioritizing resource efficiency, the city has created a thriving and resilient community that can adapt to the challenges of the future.

This is just one example of a potential case study. Other areas of focus could include:

Sustainable transportation systems
Advanced materials and manufacturing
Human-technology symbiosis for health and well-being
Planetary-scale environmental monitoring and management

By exploring these hypothetical scenarios, we can gain a better understanding of the potential and challenges of sustainable technology in 3860 and beyond.

COURTESY : NPTEL-NOC IITM

White paper on Sustainable technology of 3860 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 3860: A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 3860. While predicting the future with certainty is impossible, we can extrapolate from current trends and fundamental principles of sustainability to envision a world where technology plays a crucial role in maintaining a thriving and equitable society. This paper examines key areas of focus, potential challenges, and the importance of continuous innovation and global collaboration in achieving this vision.

1. Introduction:

The concept of sustainable technology in 3860 represents not just a collection of advanced tools and systems, but a fundamental shift in how humanity interacts with its planet and utilizes resources. It’s a vision of a future where technology is seamlessly integrated with nature, creating a closed-loop system that minimizes waste, maximizes efficiency, and ensures the well-being of all.

2. Key Areas of Focus:

2.1 Closed-Loop Resource Management: By 3860, the concept of waste as we know it may be obsolete. Advanced recycling and resource recovery systems will likely transform waste into valuable resources, creating a circular economy where materials are continuously reused and repurposed. AI-driven systems will optimize resource flows, ensuring that every atom is used efficiently.
2.2 Advanced Energy Solutions: The energy landscape of 3860 will likely be dominated by clean, abundant, and safe energy sources. We may have moved beyond current renewable technologies, harnessing new forms of energy such as zero-point energy or highly advanced geothermal systems. Energy efficiency will be paramount, with buildings, transportation, and all aspects of life designed to minimize energy consumption.
2.3 Biomimicry and Bio-Integrated Technology: Technology may be seamlessly integrated with nature, drawing inspiration from biological systems. Buildings that grow like plants, materials that self-heal, and machines that function like living organisms could become commonplace. Bio-integrated technology, where technology merges with the human body for health and enhancement, may also be a reality, raising important ethical considerations.
2.4 Localized and Personalized Production: Advanced manufacturing technologies like 3D printing and nanotechnology could enable highly localized and personalized production. This would drastically reduce the need for long supply chains and transportation, minimizing environmental impact and empowering communities to produce what they need locally.
2.5 Artificial Intelligence and Automation: AI and automation will likely play a crucial role in optimizing resource use, managing complex systems, and minimizing waste. Smart systems could manage energy grids, transportation networks, and even individual homes for maximum efficiency and sustainability.

3. Challenges and Considerations:

3.1 Ethical Implications: The advanced technologies envisioned for 3860 raise complex ethical questions. Careful consideration must be given to the implications of AI, bio-integrated technology, and other powerful tools to ensure they are used responsibly and ethically.
3.2 Accessibility and Equity: Ensuring that sustainable technologies are accessible to everyone will be crucial for creating a just and equitable future. Addressing issues of technological inequality will be a key challenge.
3.3 Resilience and Adaptability: Future technologies must be resilient to potential disruptions, such as climate change impacts, resource scarcity, and unforeseen events. They must also be adaptable to evolving needs and challenges.

4. The Path Forward:

Achieving the vision of sustainable technology in 3860 requires a long-term commitment to research, innovation, and collaboration.

4.1 Continuous Innovation: Investing in research and development across multiple disciplines is essential for developing the sustainable technologies of the future.
4.2 Global Collaboration: Addressing the challenges of sustainability requires global cooperation. Sharing knowledge, expertise, and resources will be crucial.
4.3 Education and Engagement: Educating future generations about sustainability and engaging them in the development and implementation of sustainable technologies is essential for long-term success.

5. Conclusion:

Sustainable technology in 3860 is not just a futuristic dream, but a goal we must strive towards today. By embracing innovation, prioritizing ethical considerations, and fostering global collaboration, we can create a future where technology empowers humanity to live in harmony with the planet for generations to come. The journey begins now, with every step we take towards a more sustainable world.

Industrial application of Sustainable technology of 3860 ?

It’s fascinating to imagine the industrial applications of sustainable technology in 3860! Here are some potential scenarios, extrapolating from current trends and focusing on key areas:

1. Advanced Materials and Manufacturing:

Self-Healing Materials: Imagine materials that can automatically repair themselves, extending the lifespan of industrial equipment and reducing waste. These materials could be used in everything from construction to transportation, minimizing the need for repairs and replacements.
Bio-Integrated Manufacturing: Industries might utilize biological processes to create materials and products. Imagine factories that grow materials like wood or bioplastics, reducing reliance on traditional manufacturing processes and minimizing environmental impact.
Nanotechnology: Nanotechnology could enable the creation of incredibly strong, lightweight, and versatile materials. These could be used in manufacturing to create more efficient machines, build stronger structures, and even develop new types of energy storage.

2. Energy and Resource Management:

Closed-Loop Production: Industries might operate on closed-loop systems, where all waste is recycled and reused within the production process. This would minimize resource depletion and reduce the need for landfills.
AI-Powered Optimization: AI systems could monitor and manage energy and resource use in real-time, optimizing production processes for maximum efficiency and minimizing waste.
Localized Energy Generation: Industries might generate their own energy using localized renewable sources, such as geothermal, solar, or advanced forms of energy that we cannot even imagine today. This would reduce reliance on centralized power grids and minimize transmission losses.

3. Automation and Robotics:

Autonomous Factories: Factories might be fully automated, with robots performing all tasks from manufacturing to quality control. These robots could be powered by clean energy and designed to minimize waste and maximize efficiency.
Adaptive Manufacturing: Robots could be highly adaptable, able to switch between different tasks and products with ease. This would allow industries to respond quickly to changing demands and produce a wider range of goods with minimal downtime.
Sustainable Supply Chains: AI-powered systems could manage supply chains to minimize transportation distances, optimize logistics, and reduce the environmental impact of moving goods around the world.

4. Biotechnology and Agriculture:

Sustainable Agriculture: Industries might use advanced biotechnology to develop crops that are more resilient to climate change, require less water and fertilizer, and produce higher yields. This would ensure food security for a growing population while minimizing environmental impact.
Bioremediation: Industries might use biological processes to clean up pollution and restore damaged ecosystems. This could involve using microbes to break down pollutants, or plants to absorb toxins from the soil.
Bio-Based Products: Industries might produce a wide range of bio-based products, from fuels to plastics to pharmaceuticals, using renewable resources and minimizing reliance on fossil fuels.

5. Space-Based Industries:

Resource Extraction: If humanity has expanded into space by 3860, industries might be established to extract resources from asteroids or other celestial bodies. These resources could be used to support human settlements in space or to provide materials for industries on Earth.
Space-Based Manufacturing: Industries might establish manufacturing facilities in space, taking advantage of the unique conditions of zero gravity and vacuum to create products that are difficult or impossible to produce on Earth.

These are just a few examples of the potential industrial applications of sustainable technology in 3860. It’s important to remember that these are just speculations based on current trends. The actual technologies that emerge in the future may be very different from what we can imagine today.

However, one thing is certain: sustainable technology will be essential for creating a thriving and equitable future for humanity. By embracing innovation, prioritizing ethical considerations, and fostering global collaboration, we can pave the way for a world where industry and nature coexist in harmony.

Research and development of Sustainable technology of 3860 ?

You’re asking about the ongoing efforts to make the vision of sustainable technology in 3860 a reality! While we can’t predict the exact technologies, we can discuss the crucial areas of research and development happening now that are laying the foundation for that future:

1. Advanced Materials Science:

Self-healing materials: Researchers are developing materials that can repair themselves, mimicking biological processes. This has huge implications for durability and reducing waste in everything from construction to electronics.
Bioplastics and biodegradable materials: Scientists are exploring alternatives to traditional plastics derived from fossil fuels. This involves creating plastics from renewable resources like plants or developing materials that break down naturally in the environment.
Nanomaterials: Research in nanotechnology is leading to the creation of materials with unique properties, like increased strength, lightness, or conductivity. These could revolutionize various industries, from construction to energy storage.

2. Energy Technologies:

Next-generation solar: Scientists are working on improving the efficiency and affordability of solar energy, including exploring new materials and designs for solar cells.
Advanced energy storage: Developing more efficient and sustainable ways to store energy is crucial for widespread adoption of renewable energy. This includes research into batteries, fuel cells, and other energy storage technologies.
Fusion energy: While still in early stages, fusion energy holds the potential for a clean and virtually limitless energy source. Ongoing research is focused on making fusion a viable and practical energy source.

3. Biotechnology and Agriculture:

Genetic engineering for crops: Researchers are developing crops that are more resilient to climate change, require less water and fertilizer, and have higher yields. This is crucial for ensuring food security in a changing world.
Sustainable agriculture practices: Scientists are exploring ways to reduce the environmental impact of agriculture, such as precision farming, which uses technology to optimize resource use, and agroforestry, which integrates trees into agricultural systems.
Bioremediation: Researchers are investigating how to use biological processes to clean up pollution and restore damaged ecosystems. This includes using microbes to break down pollutants or plants to absorb toxins from the soil.

4. Artificial Intelligence and Computing:

AI for resource management: AI can be used to optimize energy grids, manage water resources, and improve the efficiency of industrial processes. Researchers are developing AI algorithms that can analyze data and make decisions to minimize waste and maximize sustainability.
Sustainable computing: As computing becomes more prevalent, researchers are exploring ways to reduce its environmental impact. This includes developing more energy-efficient hardware and software, as well as finding ways to recycle and reuse electronic components.

5. Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Research:

Sustainable development: Researchers are studying the social, economic, and environmental aspects of sustainable development to understand how to create a more equitable and sustainable future.
Environmental policy: Social scientists are working on developing policies that promote sustainable practices and encourage the adoption of sustainable technologies.
Ethical considerations: As technology advances, it’s crucial to consider the ethical implications of its use. Researchers are exploring the ethical dimensions of sustainable technology to ensure that it is used responsibly and for the benefit of all.

Important Note: The research and development of sustainable technology is a global effort, with scientists, engineers, and researchers from around the world contributing to this important field. International collaborations, knowledge sharing, and open-source innovation are crucial for accelerating progress towards a sustainable future.

By continuing to invest in these areas of research and development, we can lay the foundation for the sustainable technologies that will be needed in 3860 and beyond. It’s a long-term endeavor that requires dedication, collaboration, and a commitment to creating a better future for all.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.