Sustainable Technology of 3790

81 / 100

Sustainable Technology of 3790 ?

Sustainable technology in 3790 would likely be highly advanced and integrated into all aspects of life. It’s difficult to say exactly what it would look like, but here are some possibilities based on current trends and potential future developments:

Energy: Energy would likely be generated from renewable sources like solar, wind, and geothermal, and potentially even more advanced technologies like fusion or zero-point energy. Energy storage would be highly efficient, and distribution would be smart and optimized to minimize waste.
Materials: Materials would be sustainably sourced and manufactured, with a focus on closed-loop systems and circular economy principles. Advanced materials like metamaterials and self-healing materials could be commonplace.
Manufacturing: Manufacturing processes would be highly automated and efficient, with minimal waste and pollution. 3D printing and other advanced manufacturing techniques could allow for on-demand production of goods, reducing the need for mass production and transportation.
Transportation: Transportation would be dominated by electric vehicles and other sustainable modes of transport, such as high-speed trains and personal air vehicles. Self-driving technology would be widespread, and transportation networks would be optimized for efficiency and safety.
Agriculture: Agriculture would be highly efficient and sustainable, with a focus on vertical farming, precision agriculture, and other advanced techniques. Food production would be localized and resilient to climate change.
Waste Management: Waste management would be a thing of the past, with most materials being reused or recycled. Advanced technologies could even allow for the conversion of waste into energy or other useful resources.
Computing: Computing would be highly advanced, with quantum computing and other next-generation technologies being commonplace. Computing would be integrated into all aspects of life, from personal devices to infrastructure systems.

In addition to these specific technologies, sustainable technology in 3790 would likely be characterized by:

Interconnectedness: All systems would be interconnected and optimized for efficiency and sustainability.
Intelligence: Artificial intelligence and machine learning would play a key role in managing and optimizing resources.
Resilience: Systems would be designed to be resilient to climate change and other disruptions.
Accessibility: Sustainable technologies would be accessible to all, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status.

Of course, this is just speculation. The actual nature of sustainable technology in 3790 could be very different. However, it is clear that sustainability will be a key driver of technological development in the centuries to come.

What is Sustainable Technology of 3790 ?

It’s fascinating to imagine what sustainable technology might look like in 3790! While we can’t know for sure, we can speculate based on current trends and potential future developments. Here are some possibilities:

Energy:

Renewable Sources: Energy would likely be generated entirely from renewable sources like solar, wind, geothermal, and potentially even more advanced technologies like fusion or zero-point energy.
Efficient Storage: Energy storage would be highly efficient, and distribution would be smart and optimized to minimize waste.

Materials:

Sustainable Sourcing: Materials would be sustainably sourced and manufactured, with a focus on closed-loop systems and circular economy principles.
Advanced Materials: Advanced materials like metamaterials and self-healing materials could be commonplace.

Manufacturing:

Automation and Efficiency: Manufacturing processes would be highly automated and efficient, with minimal waste and pollution.
On-Demand Production: 3D printing and other advanced manufacturing techniques could allow for on-demand production of goods, reducing the need for mass production and transportation.

Transportation:

Electric and Sustainable: Transportation would be dominated by electric vehicles and other sustainable modes of transport, such as high-speed trains and personal air vehicles.
Self-Driving Technology: Self-driving technology would be widespread, and transportation networks would be optimized for efficiency and safety.

Agriculture:

Efficient and Sustainable: Agriculture would be highly efficient and sustainable, with a focus on vertical farming, precision agriculture, and other advanced techniques.
Localized Production: Food production would be localized and resilient to climate change.

Waste Management:

Resource Recovery: Waste management would be a thing of the past, with most materials being reused or recycled.
Waste-to-Energy: Advanced technologies could even allow for the conversion of waste into energy or other useful resources.

Computing:

Advanced Computing: Computing would be highly advanced, with quantum computing and other next-generation technologies being commonplace.
Integrated Computing: Computing would be integrated into all aspects of life, from personal devices to infrastructure systems.

Overall Characteristics:

Interconnectedness: All systems would be interconnected and optimized for efficiency and sustainability.
Intelligence: Artificial intelligence and machine learning would play a key role in managing and optimizing resources.
Resilience: Systems would be designed to be resilient to climate change and other disruptions.
Accessibility: Sustainable technologies would be accessible to all, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status.

Who is required Sustainable Technology of 3790 ?

It’s more accurate to ask who will benefit from sustainable technology in 3790, rather than who requires it. In 3790, sustainable technology would likely be so deeply integrated into society that it would be essential for everyone’s well-being. Here’s a breakdown of who would benefit:

Humanity as a whole: The primary beneficiary would be humanity itself. Sustainable technology would ensure a healthy planet, abundant resources, and a high quality of life for all. It would mitigate the risks of climate change, pollution, and resource depletion, creating a more stable and prosperous future.
Future generations: Sustainable technology is inherently about ensuring a good future for those who come after us. By preserving the environment and using resources responsibly, we would be leaving a legacy of a thriving planet for future generations.
The environment: Sustainable technology would work in harmony with the natural world, minimizing human impact and preserving biodiversity. It would help restore ecosystems, reduce pollution, and protect endangered species.
All living things: Sustainable technology would benefit not just humans, but all living things. A healthy planet with clean air and water would support a diverse range of life.
Individuals: On a personal level, individuals would benefit from access to clean energy, sustainable transportation, healthy food, and a safe environment. They would also likely have access to advanced technologies that enhance their lives in various ways.

In essence, sustainable technology in 3790 would be a foundation for a thriving and equitable society where both humanity and the planet can flourish. It wouldn’t be a matter of certain groups requiring it, but rather a fundamental aspect of life that benefits everyone.

When is required Sustainable Technology of 3790 ?

That’s a great question that gets to the heart of why we should care about sustainability! It’s not just about the distant future, but also about the present and near future. Here’s a breakdown of when sustainable technology is required:

Now: We need sustainable technology right now to address the urgent challenges of climate change, pollution, and resource depletion. The longer we wait, the more severe these problems will become. Implementing sustainable solutions today can help us mitigate the worst effects of these issues and create a more sustainable future.
In the coming decades: As the global population grows and resource demands increase, the need for sustainable technology will become even more critical. We need to develop and implement sustainable solutions in the near future to ensure a healthy planet and a good quality of life for everyone.
In the long term: Sustainable technology is essential for the long-term survival and well-being of humanity. By using resources responsibly and minimizing our impact on the environment, we can ensure that future generations have access to the resources they need to thrive.

Essentially, the need for sustainable technology is not something that will suddenly arise in 3790. It’s an ongoing requirement that starts now and continues into the future. The sooner we embrace sustainable practices and technologies, the better off we will be.

While it’s fun to imagine the advanced sustainable technology of 3790, it’s crucial to remember that the foundation for that future is built on the choices we make today.

COURTESY : Bernard Marr

Where is required Sustainable Technology of 3790 ?

This is a really interesting question! When we talk about where sustainable technology is required in 3790, it’s not about a specific location, but rather about the scope of its integration. In 3790, sustainable technology would likely be so ubiquitous that it would be needed and present in:

Everywhere on Earth: Sustainable technology would be essential in all regions of the world, from bustling cities to remote villages. It would support infrastructure, agriculture, transportation, and daily life for everyone, regardless of their location.
Beyond Earth: As humanity potentially expands beyond Earth, sustainable technology would be crucial for establishing and maintaining off-world settlements. It would enable resource extraction, energy generation, and life support in space or on other planets.
All aspects of life: Sustainable technology would be integrated into every facet of human existence, from the way we produce food and energy to the way we communicate and interact with each other. It would be a fundamental part of how society functions.

Essentially, sustainable technology in 3790 would be a global and universal necessity. It wouldn’t be confined to specific places, but rather a fundamental part of the environment and the way of life for all.

It’s important to remember that this widespread integration of sustainable technology wouldn’t just happen magically. It would require continuous effort and innovation over centuries to develop and implement these technologies on a global scale.

How is required Sustainable Technology of 3790 ?

The “how” of sustainable technology in 3790 is a complex question, and since we’re talking about a future so distant, it’s largely speculative. However, we can extrapolate from current trends and imagine potential pathways:

Continuous Innovation: Sustainable technology in 3790 would be the result of centuries of continuous research, development, and innovation. It wouldn’t be a single breakthrough, but rather a constant evolution of existing technologies and the creation of entirely new ones.
Global Collaboration: Achieving such widespread sustainable technology would require unprecedented global collaboration. Scientists, engineers, and policymakers from all over the world would need to work together to share knowledge, resources, and best practices.
Systems Thinking: Sustainable technology in 3790 would likely be based on a holistic, systems-thinking approach. This means understanding the interconnectedness of different systems (energy, water, food, transportation, etc.) and designing solutions that optimize the entire system, rather than just individual components.
Integration of Disciplines: Developing advanced sustainable technology would require the integration of various disciplines, including physics, chemistry, biology, materials science, computer science, and engineering. Experts from different fields would need to work together to create truly innovative solutions.
Artificial Intelligence and Automation: AI and automation would likely play a key role in developing and managing sustainable technology. AI could be used to optimize energy grids, manage resources, and design new materials. Automation could make manufacturing processes more efficient and sustainable.
Education and Awareness: A sustainable future would require a global population that understands and values sustainability. Education and awareness campaigns would be essential to promote sustainable practices and encourage the development of sustainable technology.
Ethical Considerations: As technology advances, ethical considerations become increasingly important. In 3790, it would be crucial to ensure that sustainable technology is used responsibly and ethically, and that it benefits all of humanity.
Economic Incentives: Economic incentives would likely play a role in driving the adoption of sustainable technology. Governments and businesses could provide incentives for developing and using sustainable solutions.
Adaptive Management: The world is constantly changing, so sustainable technology would need to be adaptable. In 3790, it would be crucial to have systems in place to monitor the environment and adapt technologies as needed.

It’s important to remember that this is just one possible scenario. The actual path to sustainable technology in 3790 could be very different. However, the key takeaway is that achieving such a future would require a sustained and concerted effort from all of humanity over many generations.

Case study is Sustainable Technology of 3790 ?

It’s tricky to do a traditional case study on sustainable technology in 3790, as it’s so far in the future! But, we can create a hypothetical case study to explore what it might look like, drawing on current trends and projecting them forward.

Case Study: The Integrated City of Aurora, 3790

Background: Aurora is a large, thriving city powered entirely by sustainable technology. It’s a model of urban sustainability, showcasing how technology can be used to create a harmonious relationship between humans and the environment.

Key Sustainable Technologies:

Energy: Aurora is powered by a network of interconnected renewable energy sources, including advanced solar, wind, and geothermal power plants. Energy storage is highly efficient, utilizing next-generation batteries and potentially even more advanced methods like gravitational energy storage.
Materials: The city operates on a circular economy model. Buildings are constructed from sustainably sourced, self-healing materials. Waste is virtually non-existent, as all materials are either reused, recycled, or converted into energy.
Transportation: Aurora has a highly efficient and sustainable transportation system. Electric vehicles are ubiquitous, and self-driving technology optimizes traffic flow. High-speed rail connects Aurora to other cities, and personal air vehicles provide an alternative mode of transport.
Agriculture: Aurora has integrated vertical farms and hydroponic gardens that provide fresh, locally grown food for its residents. Precision agriculture techniques are used to optimize food production and minimize resource use.
Waste Management: Aurora has a sophisticated waste management system that utilizes advanced technologies to sort and process waste. Most materials are reused or recycled, and any remaining waste is converted into energy.
Computing: Aurora has a highly advanced computing infrastructure that integrates quantum computing and AI. This technology is used to manage the city’s resources, optimize energy use, and provide personalized services to residents.

Challenges and Solutions:

Initial Investment: Building Aurora required a significant initial investment in sustainable technology. This was overcome through a combination of public and private funding, as well as innovative financing mechanisms.
Technological Development: Developing the necessary sustainable technologies required centuries of continuous research and innovation. This was achieved through global collaboration and a focus on interdisciplinary research.
Social Acceptance: Gaining public acceptance for new technologies and lifestyle changes was a challenge. This was addressed through education and awareness campaigns, as well as by demonstrating the benefits of sustainable living.

Outcomes:

Environmental Sustainability: Aurora has a minimal environmental footprint. It is carbon-neutral and has a thriving ecosystem.
Economic Prosperity: Aurora has a strong and sustainable economy, driven by innovation and green technologies.
High Quality of Life: Aurora’s residents enjoy a high quality of life, with access to clean energy, sustainable transportation, healthy food, and advanced technologies.

Lessons Learned:

Long-term Vision: Achieving sustainable technology requires a long-term vision and commitment.
Global Collaboration: Global collaboration is essential for developing and implementing sustainable solutions.
Continuous Innovation: Continuous innovation is necessary to overcome challenges and improve sustainable technologies.
Social Acceptance: Public acceptance is crucial for the successful implementation of sustainable technology.

Conclusion:

The case of Aurora demonstrates that sustainable technology can be used to create thriving and environmentally responsible cities. By investing in innovation, fostering global collaboration, and prioritizing sustainability, we can create a better future for all.

This hypothetical case study provides a glimpse into what sustainable technology might look like in 3790. While it’s speculative, it highlights the potential for technology to create a more sustainable and equitable future.

COURTESY : RBC

White paper on Sustainable Technology of 3790 ?

White Paper: Sustainable Technology in 3790 – A Vision for a Thriving Future

Abstract:

This white paper explores the potential landscape of sustainable technology in the year 3790. Building upon current trends and extrapolating future advancements, it envisions a world where technology is deeply integrated with ecological principles, creating a harmonious and thriving global society. The paper examines potential advancements in key areas like energy, materials, manufacturing, transportation, agriculture, waste management, and computing, highlighting the interconnectedness and intelligence of future systems. It also discusses the crucial role of continuous innovation, global collaboration, and ethical considerations in achieving this vision.

1. Introduction:

The challenges facing humanity today – climate change, resource depletion, pollution – necessitate a fundamental shift towards sustainable practices. This paper looks far into the future, the year 3790, to imagine how technology might evolve to support a truly sustainable civilization. While speculative, this exercise allows us to explore potential pathways and inspire present-day action towards a more sustainable future.

2. Key Areas of Sustainable Technology in 3790:

Energy: By 3790, reliance on fossil fuels would be a distant memory. Energy would be generated entirely from renewable sources, likely a combination of highly advanced solar, wind, geothermal, and potentially even more revolutionary technologies like fusion or zero-point energy. Smart grids and highly efficient energy storage systems would minimize waste and ensure reliable power distribution.
Materials: The concept of “waste” would be largely obsolete. Materials science would have produced advanced, self-healing materials with incredibly long lifespans. Closed-loop systems and circular economy principles would govern material flows, ensuring that resources are reused, recycled, or repurposed indefinitely.
Manufacturing: Manufacturing processes would be fully automated and highly efficient, minimizing resource consumption and pollution. Additive manufacturing (3D printing) and other advanced techniques would enable on-demand production, reducing the need for mass production and long-distance transportation.
Transportation: Transportation would be dominated by electric vehicles, high-speed rail, and potentially personal air vehicles, all powered by sustainable energy sources. Self-driving technology and intelligent traffic management systems would optimize traffic flow and minimize congestion.
Agriculture: Food production would be highly efficient and sustainable, utilizing advanced techniques like vertical farming, precision agriculture, and hydroponics. Food would be grown locally, reducing transportation costs and environmental impact.
Waste Management: Advanced waste management systems would recover valuable resources from what is currently considered waste. Materials would be reused or recycled, and any remaining waste would be converted into energy or other useful products.
Computing: Quantum computing and other next-generation technologies would be commonplace, powering advanced AI systems that manage and optimize all aspects of sustainable living. Computing would be seamlessly integrated into everyday life, enhancing efficiency and convenience.

3. Characteristics of Sustainable Technology in 3790:

Interconnectedness: All systems would be interconnected and optimized for efficiency and sustainability. Smart grids, sensor networks, and AI would enable real-time monitoring and management of resources.
Intelligence: Artificial intelligence and machine learning would play a critical role in managing and optimizing resource use, predicting and mitigating environmental risks, and developing new sustainable technologies.
Resilience: Systems would be designed to be resilient to climate change, natural disasters, and other disruptions. Redundancy and distributed systems would ensure that essential services remain available even in the face of unforeseen events.
Accessibility: Sustainable technologies would be accessible to all, regardless of location or socioeconomic status. Equitable access to resources and opportunities would be a fundamental principle.

4. The Path to 3790:

Achieving this vision of sustainable technology in 3790 requires a long-term commitment to:

Continuous Innovation: Sustained investment in research and development is essential to drive innovation in sustainable technologies.
Global Collaboration: International cooperation is crucial for sharing knowledge, resources, and best practices.
Ethical Considerations: Ethical frameworks must guide the development and deployment of new technologies, ensuring that they are used responsibly and for the benefit of all.
Education and Awareness: Promoting education and awareness about sustainability is essential to fostering a culture of environmental stewardship.

5. Conclusion:

The vision of sustainable technology in 3790 presented in this white paper is ambitious but achievable. By embracing innovation, fostering global collaboration, and prioritizing ethical considerations, we can create a future where technology and nature coexist in harmony, ensuring a thriving planet for generations to come. The journey begins today, with the choices we make now shaping the world of tomorrow.

Industrial application of Sustainable Technology of 3790 ?

It’s fascinating to consider the industrial applications of sustainable technology in 3790! Here are some potential examples, extrapolating from current trends and imagining how far technology might advance:

1. Advanced Materials Production:

Self-healing Factories: Imagine factories that can automatically repair and maintain themselves, minimizing downtime and resource waste. These factories could use advanced AI and robotics to monitor their own condition and make necessary repairs using self-healing materials.
On-Demand Material Synthesis: Factories could have the ability to synthesize materials on demand, tailoring their properties to specific needs. This would eliminate the need for vast stockpiles of materials and reduce transportation costs.
Closed-Loop Manufacturing: Manufacturing processes would be designed with closed-loop systems, where all byproducts are captured and reused. This would minimize waste and pollution, creating a truly circular economy.

2. Energy-Intensive Industries:

Sustainable Mining: Mining operations could be completely transformed, utilizing advanced robotics and AI to extract resources with minimal environmental impact. Sustainable energy sources would power these operations, and waste materials would be processed and reused.
Green Steel Production: Steel production, a traditionally energy-intensive process, could be revolutionized by sustainable technologies. Hydrogen-based steelmaking or other innovative methods could eliminate the need for fossil fuels, significantly reducing carbon emissions.
Carbon Capture and Utilization: Industries that inevitably produce some carbon emissions could utilize advanced carbon capture and utilization technologies. Captured CO2 could be converted into valuable products, such as fuels or building materials.

3. Agriculture and Food Production:

Vertical Farms and Automated Greenhouses: Large-scale vertical farms and automated greenhouses could be commonplace, providing fresh, locally grown food for urban populations. These facilities would use minimal land and water, and they would be powered by sustainable energy sources.
Precision Agriculture: Advanced sensors, AI, and robotics could be used to optimize agricultural practices. Fields would be monitored in real-time, allowing for precise application of water, fertilizers, and pesticides, minimizing waste and environmental impact.
Sustainable Aquaculture: Fish farming could become more sustainable through the use of closed-loop systems and advanced monitoring technologies. This would reduce pollution and protect wild fish populations.

4. Infrastructure and Construction:

Self-Healing Infrastructure: Roads, bridges, and other infrastructure could be built with self-healing materials, reducing maintenance costs and extending their lifespan.
Modular Construction: Buildings could be constructed using modular components that are manufactured off-site and assembled on-site. This would reduce construction time and waste, and it would allow for greater flexibility in building design.
Smart Cities: Cities would be equipped with advanced sensor networks and AI systems to optimize resource use, manage traffic flow, and improve the quality of life for residents.

5. Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing:

Biorefineries: Biorefineries could convert biomass into a variety of valuable products, such as biofuels, bioplastics, and biochemicals. This would reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and create new economic opportunities.
Synthetic Biology: Synthetic biology could be used to engineer microorganisms that can produce valuable compounds, such as pharmaceuticals or industrial enzymes. This could lead to more sustainable and efficient manufacturing processes.

These are just a few examples of the potential industrial applications of sustainable technology in 3790. It’s important to remember that these are speculative scenarios, but they illustrate the transformative potential of sustainable technology. By investing in research and development today, we can pave the way for a future where industry and sustainability go hand in hand.

Research and development of Sustainable Technology of 3790 ?

It’s exciting to think about the research and development (R&D) that would lead to sustainable technology in 3790! While we can’t know the specifics, we can imagine some key areas of focus:

1. Advanced Energy Technologies:

Fusion Energy: Continued research into fusion energy, aiming to achieve stable and efficient fusion reactors that can provide clean and abundant energy.
Zero-Point Energy: Exploring the theoretical possibility of harnessing zero-point energy, a potentially limitless source of energy derived from quantum fluctuations in the vacuum.
Advanced Energy Storage: Developing highly efficient and long-lasting energy storage solutions, such as next-generation batteries, supercapacitors, or even more advanced methods like gravitational energy storage or utilizing exotic states of matter.
Wireless Energy Transfer: Researching and developing technologies for efficient wireless energy transfer over long distances, potentially enabling the transmission of energy from space-based solar power stations or other remote sources.

2. Breakthrough Materials Science:

Self-Healing Materials: Developing materials that can automatically repair themselves when damaged, extending their lifespan and reducing the need for maintenance.
Metamaterials: Designing and engineering metamaterials with unique properties not found in nature, such as the ability to manipulate light or sound waves in unprecedented ways.
Biodegradable and Compostable Materials: Creating new materials that are entirely biodegradable and compostable, minimizing waste and pollution.
Advanced Composites: Developing lightweight and strong composite materials for use in transportation, construction, and other applications.

3. Revolutionizing Manufacturing:

4D Printing: Expanding on 3D printing technology to create objects that can change shape over time in response to external stimuli, opening up new possibilities for manufacturing and design.
Nanofabrication: Developing techniques for manufacturing materials and devices at the nanoscale, enabling the creation of incredibly small and complex structures.
Biomanufacturing: Utilizing biological systems to produce materials and products, such as biofuels, bioplastics, and pharmaceuticals, in a sustainable and efficient manner.

4. Transforming Agriculture and Food Production:

Advanced Plant Science: Researching plant biology to develop crops that are more resilient to climate change, require less water and nutrients, and have higher yields.
Precision Agriculture: Developing advanced sensors, AI, and robotics to optimize agricultural practices, minimizing resource use and environmental impact.
Cultivated Meat and Alternative Proteins: Researching and developing technologies for producing meat and other protein sources without the need for traditional animal agriculture.

5. Advancing Computing and AI:

Quantum Computing: Building and improving quantum computers to solve complex problems that are beyond the capabilities of classical computers, with applications in materials science, medicine, and AI.
Artificial General Intelligence (AGI): Pursuing the development of AGI, AI systems that possess human-level intelligence and can perform a wide range of tasks, potentially revolutionizing many aspects of society.
Neuromorphic Computing: Developing computing systems that mimic the structure and function of the human brain, enabling more efficient and powerful AI.

6. Understanding and Protecting the Environment:

Climate Change Mitigation: Researching and developing technologies for removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere and mitigating the effects of climate change.
Ecosystem Restoration: Developing methods for restoring damaged ecosystems and preserving biodiversity.
Planetary Monitoring: Creating advanced systems for monitoring the Earth’s environment, tracking changes in real-time, and predicting future trends.

These are just a few examples of the potential areas of R&D for sustainable technology in 3790. It’s important to remember that this is a long-term endeavor that will require sustained effort and investment over centuries. By focusing on these key areas, we can pave the way for a future where technology and sustainability go hand in hand.

COURTESY : Tech Evaluate

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Purvis, Ben; Mao, Yong; Robinson, Darren (2019). “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins”. Sustainability Science. 14 (3): 681–695. Bibcode:2019SuSc…14..681P. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. ISSN 1862-4065. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Ramsey, Jeffry L. (2015). “On Not Defining Sustainability”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (6): 1075–1087. Bibcode:2015JAEE…28.1075R. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9578-3. ISSN 1187-7863. S2CID 146790960.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Kotzé, Louis J.; Kim, Rakhyun E.; Burdon, Peter; du Toit, Louise; Glass, Lisa-Maria; Kashwan, Prakash; Liverman, Diana; Montesano, Francesco S.; Rantala, Salla (2022). “Planetary Integrity”. In Sénit, Carole-Anne; Biermann, Frank; Hickmann, Thomas (eds.). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–171. doi:10.1017/9781009082945.007. ISBN 978-1-316-51429-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Bosselmann, Klaus (2010). “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law”. Sustainability. 2 (8): 2424–2448. doi:10.3390/su2082424. hdl:10535/6499. ISSN 2071-1050. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u Berg, Christian (2020). Sustainable action: overcoming the barriers. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-57873-1. OCLC 1124780147.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “Sustainability”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ “Sustainable Development”. UNESCO. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John (2010). “What is Sustainability?”. Sustainability. 2 (11): 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Nelson, Anitra (31 January 2024). “Degrowth as a Concept and Practice: Introduction”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Vadén, T.; Lähde, V.; Majava, A.; Järvensivu, P.; Toivanen, T.; Hakala, E.; Eronen, J.T. (2020). “Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature”. Environmental Science & Policy. 112: 236–244. Bibcode:2020ESPol.112..236V. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016. PMC 7330600. PMID 32834777.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Parrique T., Barth J., Briens F., C. Kerschner, Kraus-Polk A., Kuokkanen A., Spangenberg J.H., 2019. Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
^ Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB.
^ Hardyment, Richard (2024). Measuring Good Business: Making Sense of Environmental, Social & Governance Data. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781032601199.
^ Bell, Simon; Morse, Stephen (2012). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Abington: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Howes, Michael; Wortley, Liana; Potts, Ruth; Dedekorkut-Howes, Aysin; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia; Davidson, Julie; Smith, Timothy; Nunn, Patrick (2017). “Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?”. Sustainability. 9 (2): 165. doi:10.3390/su9020165. hdl:10453/90953. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Kinsley, M. and Lovins, L.H. (September 1997). “Paying for Growth, Prospering from Development.” Archived 17 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 June 2009.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Sustainable Shrinkage: Envisioning a Smaller, Stronger Economy Archived 11 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Thesolutionsjournal.com. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
^ Apetrei, Cristina I.; Caniglia, Guido; von Wehrden, Henrik; Lang, Daniel J. (1 May 2021). “Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science”. Global Environmental Change. 68: 102222. Bibcode:2021GEC….6802222A. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102222. ISSN 0959-3780.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Benson, Melinda Harm; Craig, Robin Kundis (2014). “End of Sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources. 27 (7): 777–782. Bibcode:2014SNatR..27..777B. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.901467. ISSN 0894-1920. S2CID 67783261.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Stockholm+50: Unlocking a Better Future. Stockholm Environment Institute (Report). 18 May 2022. doi:10.51414/sei2022.011. S2CID 248881465.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Scoones, Ian (2016). “The Politics of Sustainability and Development”. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 41 (1): 293–319. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 156534921.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Harrington, Lisa M. Butler (2016). “Sustainability Theory and Conceptual Considerations: A Review of Key Ideas for Sustainability, and the Rural Context”. Papers in Applied Geography. 2 (4): 365–382. Bibcode:2016PAGeo…2..365H. doi:10.1080/23754931.2016.1239222. ISSN 2375-4931. S2CID 132458202.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
^ United Nations General Assembly (20 March 1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment; Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development; Paragraph 1″. United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
^ “University of Alberta: What is sustainability?” (PDF). mcgill.ca. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Halliday, Mike (21 November 2016). “How sustainable is sustainability?”. Oxford College of Procurement and Supply. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
^ Harper, Douglas. “sustain”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
^ Onions, Charles, T. (ed) (1964). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 2095.
^ “Sustainability Theories”. World Ocean Review. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Compare: “sustainability”. Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) The English-language word had a legal technical sense from 1835 and a resource-management connotation from 1953.
^ “Hans Carl von Carlowitz and Sustainability”. Environment and Society Portal. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
^ Dresden, SLUB. “Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung Zur Wilden Baum-Zucht”. digital.slub-dresden.de (in German). Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Von Carlowitz, H.C. & Rohr, V. (1732) Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum Zucht, Leipzig; translated from German as cited in Friederich, Simon; Symons, Jonathan (15 November 2022). “Operationalising sustainability? Why sustainability fails as an investment criterion for safeguarding the future”. Global Policy. 14: 1758–5899.13160. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13160. ISSN 1758-5880. S2CID 253560289.
^ Basler, Ernst (1972). Strategy of Progress: Environmental Pollution, Habitat Scarcity and Future Research (originally, Strategie des Fortschritts: Umweltbelastung Lebensraumverknappung and Zukunftsforshung). BLV Publishing Company.
^ Gadgil, M.; Berkes, F. (1991). “Traditional Resource Management Systems”. Resource Management and Optimization. 8: 127–141.
^ “Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome” (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Barbier, Edward B. (July 1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development”. Environmental Conservation. 14 (2): 101–110. Bibcode:1987EnvCo..14..101B. doi:10.1017/S0376892900011449. ISSN 1469-4387.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bosselmann, K. (2022) Chapter 2: A normative approach to environmental governance: sustainability at the apex of environmental law, Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by Douglas Fisher
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Agenda 21” (PDF). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. 1992. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d United Nations (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1 Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine)
^ Scott Cato, M. (2009). Green Economics. London: Earthscan, pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Obrecht, Andreas; Pham-Truffert, Myriam; Spehn, Eva; Payne, Davnah; Altermatt, Florian; Fischer, Manuel; Passarello, Cristian; Moersberger, Hannah; Schelske, Oliver; Guntern, Jodok; Prescott, Graham (5 February 2021). “Achieving the SDGs with Biodiversity”. Swiss Academies Factsheet. Vol. 16, no. 1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4457298.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopín, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, R.; Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute. ISBN 0-9712418-1-3. OCLC 49987854.
^ Ekins, Paul; Zenghelis, Dimitri (2021). “The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability”. Sustainability Science. 16 (3): 949–965. Bibcode:2021SuSc…16..949E. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5. PMC 7960882. PMID 33747239.
^ William L. Thomas, ed. (1956). Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79604-3. OCLC 276231.
^ Carson, Rachel (2002) [1st. Pub. Houghton Mifflin, 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-618-24906-0.
^ Arrhenius, Svante (1896). “XXXI. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 41 (251): 237–276. doi:10.1080/14786449608620846. ISSN 1941-5982.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c UN (1973) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972
^ UNEP (2021). “Making Peace With Nature”. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F.; 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries (2017). “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice”. BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125. hdl:11336/71342. ISSN 0006-3568.
^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). “Geology of mankind”. Nature. 415 (6867): 23. Bibcode:2002Natur.415…23C. doi:10.1038/415023a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11780095. S2CID 9743349.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Wilhelm Krull, ed. (2000). Zukunftsstreit (in German). Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ISBN 3-934730-17-5. OCLC 52639118.
^ Redclift, Michael (2005). “Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development. 13 (4): 212–227. doi:10.1002/sd.281. ISSN 0968-0802.
^ Daly, Herman E. (1996). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development (PDF). Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4708-2. OCLC 33946953.
^ United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
^ “UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative”. UN Environment | UNDP-UN Environment Poverty-Environment Initiative. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
^ PEP (2016) Poverty-Environment Partnership Joint Paper | June 2016 Getting to Zero – A Poverty, Environment and Climate Call to Action for the Sustainable Development Goals
^ Boyer, Robert H. W.; Peterson, Nicole D.; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878.
^ Doğu, Feriha Urfalı; Aras, Lerzan (2019). “Measuring Social Sustainability with the Developed MCSA Model: Güzelyurt Case”. Sustainability. 11 (9): 2503. doi:10.3390/su11092503. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ Davidson, Mark (2010). “Social Sustainability and the City: Social sustainability and city”. Geography Compass. 4 (7): 872–880. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
^ Missimer, Merlina; Robèrt, Karl-Henrik; Broman, Göran (2017). “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140: 42–52. Bibcode:2017JCPro.140…42M. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059.
^ Boyer, Robert; Peterson, Nicole; Arora, Poonam; Caldwell, Kevin (2016). “Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward”. Sustainability. 8 (9): 878. doi:10.3390/su8090878. ISSN 2071-1050.
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; James A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). “Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach”. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 15 (1): 225–243. Bibcode:2013EDSus..15..225M. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9384-2. S2CID 153452740.
^ Cohen, J. E. (2006). “Human Population: The Next Half Century.”. In Kennedy, D. (ed.). Science Magazine’s State of the Planet 2006-7. London: Island Press. pp. 13–21. ISBN 9781597266246.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Aggarwal, Dhruvak; Esquivel, Nhilce; Hocquet, Robin; Martin, Kristiina; Mungo, Carol; Nazareth, Anisha; Nikam, Jaee; Odenyo, Javan; Ravindran, Bhuvan; Kurinji, L. S.; Shawoo, Zoha; Yamada, Kohei (28 April 2022). Charting a youth vision for a just and sustainable future (PDF) (Report). Stockholm Environment Institute. doi:10.51414/sei2022.010.
^ “The Regional Institute – WACOSS Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project”. www.regional.org.au. 2012. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
^ Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina; Siragusa, Laura; Guttorm, Hanna (2020). “Introduction: toward more inclusive definitions of sustainability”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 43: 77–82. Bibcode:2020COES…43…77V. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.04.003. S2CID 219663803.
^ “Culture: Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development”. United Cities and Local Governments. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013.
^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam (2016). “Domains of Sustainability”. In Farazmand, Ali (ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1. ISBN 978-3-319-31816-5. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Robert U. Ayres & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh & John M. Gowdy, 1998. “Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability“, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute.
^ Pearce, David W.; Atkinson, Giles D. (1993). “Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 8 (2): 103–108. Bibcode:1993EcoEc…8..103P. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
^ Ayres, Robert; van den Berrgh, Jeroen; Gowdy, John (2001). “Strong versus Weak Sustainability”. Environmental Ethics. 23 (2): 155–168. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200123225. ISSN 0163-4275.
^ Cabeza Gutés, Maite (1996). “The concept of weak sustainability”. Ecological Economics. 17 (3): 147–156. Bibcode:1996EcoEc..17..147C. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
^ Bosselmann, Klaus (2017). The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4724-8128-3. OCLC 951915998.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b WEF (2020) Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy New Nature Economy, World Economic Forum in collaboration with PwC
^ James, Paul; with Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315765747.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Hardyment, Richard (2 February 2024). Measuring Good Business. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003457732. ISBN 978-1-003-45773-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd edn. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-299-6.
^ Dalal-Clayton, Barry and Sadler, Barry 2009. Sustainability Appraisal: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience. London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-357-3.^{[page needed]}
^ Hak, T. et al. 2007. Sustainability Indicators, SCOPE 67. Island Press, London. [1] Archived 2011-12-18 at the Wayback Machine
^ Wackernagel, Mathis; Lin, David; Evans, Mikel; Hanscom, Laurel; Raven, Peter (2019). “Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends”. Sustainability. 11 (7): 2164. doi:10.3390/su11072164.
^ “Sustainable Development visualized”. Sustainability concepts. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah; Fetzer, Ingo; Biggs, Oonsie; Folke, Carl; Reyers, Belinda (15 January 2015). “Planetary Boundaries – an update”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ “Ten years of nine planetary boundaries”. Stockholm Resilience Centre. November 2019. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
^ Persson, Linn; Carney Almroth, Bethanie M.; Collins, Christopher D.; Cornell, Sarah; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Diamond, Miriam L.; Fantke, Peter; Hassellöv, Martin; MacLeod, Matthew; Ryberg, Morten W.; Søgaard Jørgensen, Peter (1 February 2022). “Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities”. Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (3): 1510–1521. Bibcode:2022EnST…56.1510P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 8811958. PMID 35038861.
^ Ehrlich, P.R.; Holden, J.P. (1974). “Human Population and the global environment”. American Scientist. Vol. 62, no. 3. pp. 282–292.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). “Scientists’ warning on affluence”. Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7305220. PMID 32561753. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (PDF). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
^ TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Groth, Christian (2014). Lecture notes in Economic Growth, (mimeo), Chapter 8: Choice of social discount rate. Copenhagen University.
^ UNEP, FAO (2020). UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. 48p.
^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House. ISBN 978-1-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Berg, Christian (2017). “Shaping the Future Sustainably – Types of Barriers and Tentative Action Principles (chapter in: Future Scenarios of Global Cooperation—Practices and Challenges)”. Global Dialogues (14). Centre For Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21), Nora Dahlhaus and Daniela Weißkopf (eds.). doi:10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14. ISSN 2198-0403.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Pickering, Jonathan; Hickmann, Thomas; Bäckstrand, Karin; Kalfagianni, Agni; Bloomfield, Michael; Mert, Ayşem; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Lo, Alex Y. (2022). “Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance”. Earth System Governance. 11: 100131. Bibcode:2022ESGov..1100131P. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ European Environment Agency. (2019). Sustainability transitions: policy and practice. LU: Publications Office. doi:10.2800/641030. ISBN 9789294800862.
^ Noura Guimarães, Lucas (2020). “Introduction”. The regulation and policy of Latin American energy transitions. Elsevier. pp. xxix–xxxviii. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819521-5.00026-7. ISBN 978-0-12-819521-5. S2CID 241093198.
^ Kuenkel, Petra (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformations: An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-03691-1. OCLC 1080190654.
^ Fletcher, Charles; Ripple, William J.; Newsome, Thomas; Barnard, Phoebe; Beamer, Kamanamaikalani; Behl, Aishwarya; Bowen, Jay; Cooney, Michael; Crist, Eileen; Field, Christopher; Hiser, Krista; Karl, David M.; King, David A.; Mann, Michael E.; McGregor, Davianna P.; Mora, Camilo; Oreskes, Naomi; Wilson, Michael (4 April 2024). “Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future”. PNAS Nexus. 3 (4): pgae106. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae106. PMC 10986754. PMID 38566756. Retrieved 4 April 2024. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
^ Smith, E. T. (23 January 2024). “Practising Commoning”. The Commons Social Change Library. Retrieved 23 February 2024.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Haberl, Helmut; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Virág, Doris; Kalt, Gerald; Plank, Barbara; Brockway, Paul; Fishman, Tomer; Hausknost, Daniel; Krausmann, Fridolin; Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomäus; Mayer, Andreas (2020). “A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights”. Environmental Research Letters. 15 (6): 065003. Bibcode:2020ERL….15f5003H. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 216453887.
^ Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1932). The Economics of Welfare (PDF) (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
^ Jaeger, William K. (2005). Environmental economics for tree huggers and other skeptics. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-4416-0111-7. OCLC 232157655.
^ Roger Perman; Yue Ma; Michael Common; David Maddison; James Mcgilvray (2011). Natural resource and environmental economics (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-41753-4. OCLC 704557307.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A. (16 October 2012). “Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems”. PLOS Biology. 10 (10): e1001405. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405. ISSN 1544-9173. PMC 3473022.
^ “The Nobel Prize: Women Who Changed the World”. thenobelprize.org. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
^ Ghisellini, Patrizia; Cialani, Catia; Ulgiati, Sergio (15 February 2016). “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Towards Post Fossil Carbon Societies: Regenerative and Preventative Eco-Industrial Development. 114: 11–32. Bibcode:2016JCPro.114…11G. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Nobre, Gustavo Cattelan; Tavares, Elaine (10 September 2021). “The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 314: 127973. Bibcode:2021JCPro.31427973N. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127973. ISSN 0959-6526.
^ Zhexembayeva, N. (May 2007). “Becoming Sustainable: Tools and Resources for Successful Organizational Transformation”. Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit. Case Western University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010.
^ “About Us”. Sustainable Business Institute. Archived from the original on 17 May 2009.
^ “About the WBCSD”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Archived from the original on 9 September 2007. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
^ “Supply Chain Sustainability | UN Global Compact”. www.unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
^ “”Statement of Faith and Spiritual Leaders on the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP21 in Paris in December 2015″” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
^ “The Statement — Interfaith Climate”. www.interfaithclimate.org. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
^ McDilda, Diane Gow (2007). The everything green living book: easy ways to conserve energy, protect your family’s health, and help save the environment. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media. ISBN 978-1-59869-425-3. OCLC 124074971.
^ Gambino, Megan (15 March 2012). “Is it Too Late for Sustainable Development?”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
^ Blühdorn (2017). “Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability”. Global Discourse. 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415. ISSN 2043-7897.
^ Watson, Bruce (20 August 2016). “The troubling evolution of corporate greenwashing”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 October 2016.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. www.bloomberg.ca. BNN Bloomberg. 18 August 2018.
^ “The Troubling Evolution Of Large Scale Corporate Greenwashing”. The Conversation. 18 August 2011.
^ Ebrahimi Sirizi, Mohammad; Taghavi Zirvani, Esmaeil; Esmailzadeh, Abdulsalam; Khosravian, Jafar; Ahmadi, Reyhaneh; Mijani, Naeim; Soltannia, Reyhaneh; Jokar Arsanjani, Jamal (19 October 2023). “A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for allocation of pistachio processing facilities: A case study of Zarand, Iran”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 15054. doi:10.3390/su152015054. ISSN 2071-1050.